ML20011E456

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Concludes That No Statements or Conclusions of SALP Board in Conflict W/Or Run Counter to Findings Resulting from Insp of Plant Operations Exist
ML20011E456
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 10/24/1989
From: Waters D
PRISUTA - BECKMAN ASSOCIATES
To: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20011D121 List:
References
NUDOCS 9002140087
Download: ML20011E456 (4)


Text

_ _

\\;

y j

i j

,j

'PRISUTA-BBCKHAN ASSOCIATES RD #4, 242A' RTE 136

. ' ' ~

BELLE VERNON, PA 15012 (412) 872-9157 OCTOBER 24, 1989 1

Dennis M.'Crutchfield Associate Director for Special Profects

-Ofice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Consission Washington,-D. C. 20555

SUBJECT:

NRC STAFF DIFFERING PROFESSIONAL OPINION ON COMANCHE PEAK-I have received and reviewed the SALP report on TU Electric's Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station forwarded by you on October. 10, 1989.

In addition to a general review of the comments and findings of the SALP review board I specifically reviewed the report on the functional area of Plant Operation, considering my Interface with that area during the BOP team inspection in August 1989.

'1he conclusions of my review are that there are no statements or conclusions of the SALP board which are in conflict with or.

run counter to the findings resulting from my inspection of that area of Comanche Peak operations.

I trust this information is satisfactory for your use; should you have need for additional information, please infore me, David B. Waters Associate Consultant cc:

Donald A. Beckman ll

_.,,e4+

/ q oaz Iflo od ]

P

b.

a L

w_

sas -

nsa tw og s hF qd w gmJ f o ~j c

MM JL.dc

^N v 3 x - c & - u; 0 _R.{

\\

W@S S t

b wd

\\

%& M%-$

%Mk m'

% w & eksms r.

[. D4 w i n e9 xl a S - oD v e l m h

a % Cm.

swkuaEts ww n Acqw,h

& a9~W a

htLu w% <d Lb J

msJ l

~2

-2 n

%n oaea 90

2. %2 M ust W> LA Yb q _ A cd B 2MLL S

wA1 W

4 %

M,o' w o,mskfe wb W w

n p J ac w wim.

m WxL Q w do quL%-

eo w

-s w 1%~s

g-,

m 6-mLQ h t

g m

ue&sv m% ;A.f %(.,&

e

%mhe u

A W,q &a -

i%g-m] }&

7LU.

wy-s WM oG 60 x

8env2 V d i k wa %sp o

.er

/ 3

/

/

~

IL//9(q m

C

i:7 w u-

.. e,_.sy. p.,. y p J' '

,.s t!

J-(

i31

,,a,

1.,

. t i.,

' l t' 'Og )

%t:

e n - c.

1 3,;, w.q 4

it i.

4.w g';

.r. t ;,,

3 ;. g,. 3, j g,., g r-

.. s, p.,. ;;.,,,,,.. j 3,., y,,,,..,

o w.'

,.. ~ '

.; e.;,,,-i.,, p,,,,, j,

' I0 3

.O

..'ofprilijat,d (1.1 "' !. i.71r,,,,n [:e.,,.

.g ;,p.,.g,..

1::s < :l!',5 v.%-

l"

,.r, b e,,,

og g i r* L.t o. t,

^'

3

'n an. s l

a.i i

s/ir Denny:

,t.

i" Received-call from Mark Good, Comex, 3

on 10/26.

He participated in the 5 ", '

EP exercise with Region IV.and has

[

no comments on contents on SALP report.

It accurately reflects his opinion regarding the state of TU's emergency preparedness.

. t :. <

fi.t..

E

- - - _ _ _ _ -