ML19262B041

Forwards Pages 22 & 23 of State of Ma 791116 Memorandum in Support of Seacoast Anti-Pollution League 790502 Request for Order to Show Cause

ML19262B041
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	11/27/1979
From:	Burt L MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF
To:	NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 7912110460
Download: ML19262B041 (3)

Text

• -

.N

% THE COMMONWR4LTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

~ _ %.

• E i- ' b, DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

fi j

'

' 1 [" y JOHN W. Mc CORMACK ETATE OFFICE SUILDING ONE ASHEURTON PLACE. BOSTON 02105

' . Sc f/

FRANclS X. S ELLQm arvoNHav eENERAL November 27, 1979 Docket and Service Station Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Attention: PEG

.

Re: In the Matter of Public Service Company of New Hampshire, et al.

(Seabrook Station, Unit 1 and 2)

NRC Docket Nos. 50-443, 50-444; CPPR-135, CPPR-136

Dear Madame:

As per our conversation today, I enclose pages 22 and 23 of the " Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Memorandum in Support of Seacoast Anti-Pollution League's Request for an Order to Show Cause Dated May 2, 1979", filed on November 16, 1979 with the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation in the above captioned matter. Through inadvertence, these two pages were not included in your copy of the Commonwealth's memorandum.

I apologize for any inconvenience this oversight may have caused you or the parties.

Very truly yours, CluA Laurie Burt Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division (617) 727-2265 cc: Seabrook Service List s

f \

1532 ual g

- .

a 3

-

l L

.....=.

, 3 7912110 YhO G

-q

]P

<.n .

p

.

- -

In this case, the Supreme Court stressed that even after licensing of a reactor, the Commission retains jurisdiction "to ensure that the highest safety standards are maintained." Id.

In discharging his duty to safeguard the public, the Commission has articulated the goal that emergency plans should provide " reasonable assurance" that " suitable protective actions" can be taken on a " timely basis."26/ There is no question that emergency plans that satisfy the Commission's statutory duty or goal do not presently exist. The only

" suitable protective action" for people on the beaches in the event of a serious atmospheric release is evacuation. It is therefore the duty of the staff to assure that an emergency

,

plan can be developed which provides " reasonable assurance" that the beaches can be evacuated on a " timely basis."

Section 186(a) of the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C S2236(a)) authorizes the NRC to cuspend or revoke "[a]ny license . . . because of conditions revealed . . . which would warrant the Commission to refuse to grant a license on an original application." The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently held that this clause applies to all licensing matters, including health, safety, and environmental considerations . . . (and) reflects a deliberate policy choice on the part of Congress when it enacted section 186(a) to render licenses for nuclear facilities subject to postlicensing review under evolving licensing standards, rather than under those standards applicable at the time the license in question was issued. Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority of the City 26/ See pp. 9-10, supra.

~1 1532

.. .

of Ft. Pierce v. U.S.A. and the NRC, Nos. 77-1925 and 77-2101, slip op, at 19-20 (D.C. Cir., March 23, 1979).

Post-TMI investigations have resulted in significant new emergency planning licensing standards. The emergency plan for the Seabrook environs is now subject to postlicensing review under the new standards, and the staff should initiate this review promptly before further construction at Seabrook precludes an impartial resolution of this critical safety issue. It is the statutory duty of the staff to suspend or revoke :he Seabrook construction permits upon finding that the present emergency plans cannot provide " reasonable assurance .

. . (that) suitable protective actions (can be implemented) on a timely basis under accident conditions." (See 43 F.R. 37474)

In consideration of the grave safety issue at hand and the likelihood that a timely evacuation of the beaches near Seabrook may not be possible, it is the duty of the Staff to issue a show cause order and institute a proceeding pursuant to 10 CFR S2.202 to resolve these major outstanding safety questions.

1532 0b3