ML18033A791

Responds to Summary of 890406 Meeting Re Suppl 1 to NUREG-0737,Item I.D.1 Re Dcrdr.Nine Listed Human Engineering Discrepancies Will Be Completed Prior to Restart

ML18033A791
Person / Time
Site:	Browns Ferry
Issue date:	06/13/1989
From:	Michael Ray TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-1.D.1, TASK-TM TAC-56105, NUDOCS 8906220173
Download: ML18033A791 (8)

Text

A,C.CElZRATZD DISTRIBUTION REGULATORY INFORMATXON DISTRXBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8906220173 DOC.DATE: 89/06/13 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET N FACIL:50-260 Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, Tennessee 05000260 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATXON RAY,M.J. Tennessee Valley Authority RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Responds to NRC summary of 890406 meeting re DCRDR HEDs closure status.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: A003D COPIES RECEXVED:LTR TITLE: OR/Licensing Submittal: Suppl 1 to NURE lt

-0737(Generic ENCL ( SIZE:

Ltr

~ 82-33) 8 NOTES:"1~ Copy,'each to', S'. Black, D.M. Crutch field, B. D.'Liaw,,'R.

05000260 Pi'ers'on, B. Wilson~

ih RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ' ENCL SIMMS,M 1 1 PD 7 GEARS,G 1 1 INTERNAL: NRR/DLPQ/HFB 10 1 > 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 OC/LFMB RES/DSXR/EIB EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC 1

1,1 1

1 i 0 1

1 1

'NRC PDR 1

1 1 NOTES: 5 5 R

l D

S D

1 D

NOTE IO ALL RIDS" KKXFHMS:

PIZ'ASE HELP US KO REDUCE HASTE! QMECZ 'IHE DOQ3MEÃZ CEPZROL DESK, RXN P1-37 (EXT. 20079) KO 1KiQGNATB YMR NAME FKH DISTRIBUTION LISTS XQR DOCUMEMX8 Y0U DON'T NEED<

22 ENCL 2'1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED- LTTR

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 3740t 5H 157B Lookout Place gotI I S %88 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTH: Document Control Desk Mashington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:

In the Matter of ) Docket No. 50-260 Tennessee Valley Authority )

BROMHS PERRY HUCLEAR PLAHT (BFN) SUPPLEMENT 1 TO HUREG-0737, ITEM I.D.1 DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEM (DCRDR)

This letter is in response to the'NRC's summary of the April 6, 1989 meeting with TVA concerning DCRDR Human Engineering Discrepancies (HEDs) closure status. This meeting supanary was approved by D. H. Moran, Project Manager, TVA Projects Division, HRR, on April 21, 1989.

The staff's meeting summary requested TVA reevaluate the schedule for the completion of HED 283 Different Zero References for Reactor Mater Level Instrumentation and provide a letter documenting all of TVA's efforts to resolve HEDs. The specific staff requests and TVA's responses are provided in enclosure 1.

Enclosure 2 is a list of the commitments contained in this response.

If you have any questions, please telephone Patrick Carier at (205$ 729-3570.

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Manager( Nuclear Li nsing and Regulatory Affairs Enclosures cc: See page 2 S906220i73 05000260 S90613'DR

~\

Qo5 ADOCK P

PDC

(/ (

An Equal Opportunity Employer

~ I

' I 7 - ' ~I I

I II J

U.S'. Huclear Regulatory Commission JUN is kg cc (Enclosures):

Hs. S. C. Black, Assistant Director for Projects TVA Projects Division U.S. Huclear Regulatory Commission One Mhite Flint, Horth 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Haryland 20852 Hr. B. A. Milson, Assistant Director for Inspection Programs TVA Projects Division U.S. Huclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Harietta Street, HM, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 HRC Resident Inspector Brogans Ferry Huclear Plant Route 12, Box 637 Athens, Alabama 35609-2000

~

~

g EHCLOSURE 1 V

BROOMS FERRY HUCLEAR PLAHT (BFN)

RESPONSE TO HRC REQUESTS REGARDING DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCIES (HEDs)

TVA would like to clarify the chx.onology of the resolution of HUREG-0737, Item II.K.3.27 Common Reference Level 'for Vessel Level Instrumentation discussed in the HRC's summary of the April 6, 1989 meeting. TVA's April 9, 1981 letter proposed the installation of visual indication to level instrumentation (for example, tape or markers) to meet the requirements of this item. Changes to the instrument scales, procedures, technical speciEications or training, were specifically not planned nor considex'ed necessary. The HRC's October 23, 1981 letter advised TVA that this modiEication was considered acceptable as an intex.'im measure. The HRC's Octobex'28, 1982 letter proposed the incorporation of the final x.esolut,ion of this issue into the control room design review in order to eliminate the possibility oE changing water level instrument scales twice; once per Item II.K.3.27 and then possibly again per Item I.D.1. By lettex dated December 3, 1982, TVA concurred with the HRC's proposal and stated any required modifications would be resolved on the schedule specified in the x.esolution of Item I.D.l. TVA has complied with the HRC's April 21, 1989 request to con..idex'. completion of HED 283 Different Zero References for Reactor Vessel Level Ixxstrumentation, prior to restart. TVA will resolve HED 283 px.ior to unit 2 restart.

At Uxe close of the April 21, 1989 meeting between TVA and HRC on Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR), the staff requested TVA provide a letter to the staff documenting all theix. efforts to resolve HEDs. The specific reque ts GIld TVA's responses are provided below.

Request: The restart review of original batch of HEDs (documented in an August 13, 1987 memorandum from P. K. Guha to D. F. Faulkner).

Response: TVA confirms Uxat the HEDs described in TVA's December 30, 1986 letter wex;e evaluated in July 1987 against the restart cxiteria which was in effect at that time. This review was documented in the August 13, 1987 internal TVA memorandum which was reviewed by the HRC during this meeting.

Request: Identify the six HEDs x'esulting from the August 13, 1987 review which met the restart criteria, and were "connnitted to" Eor repair before restar't Response'he siK x.estart required HEDs which were identif ied in the July 1987 review were:

HED 109 Difficulty in Changing Annunciator Light Bulbs Due to Panel Design HED 201 EOI-x;elated Dx.ywell (Torus) Px;essure (Instrument Range)

HED 202 EOI Procedux.'e Concerns HED 287 Emergency AC Light,ing HED 290 L'OI-x;elated Steam Line Flow (Instrument Range)

HED 292 EOI Clarity and Useability Concerns

ENCLOSURE 1 (CONTINUED)

BROOMS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT (BFN)

RESPONSE TO NRC REQUESTS REGARDING DETAILED CONTROi. ROOM DESIGN REVIEM HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCIES (HEDs)

Request: The reassessment of all HEDs identified in our March 17, 1989 letter, and the results of that assessment (including commitments).

Response: In response to the NRC's March 17, 1989 letter, TVA reevaluated all HEDs against the restart criteria which is contained in the Nuclear Performance Plan. Two addition restart required HEDs were identified from the EPG evaluation:

HED 299 EOI-3 Procedure Ambiguity/Deficiency HED 300 EOI-3 Entry Condition Request: The documentation of all action taken to date which provide interim, or final, liED corrective action.

Response: The following is the status of the non-restart HEDs:

HEDs that are complete:

002, 003, 015, 197, 203, 204, 274, 301, 302, 304, 305, 307, 308, and 310.

HEDs that are currently scheduled to be fully or partially complete before startup that are not committed to are:

004, 013, 072, 093, 107, 108, 144, 148, 153, 158, 160, 161, 162, 172, 179, 182, 184, 194, 196, 200, 208, 213, 214, 215, 216, 267, 268, 272, 280, 282, and 306.

Of the 26 HEDs that were not rated as Category 1 though 4 because they were not a valid concern or not specifically DCRDR related, 16 have been resolved. They are:

006 j 009 ) 016 ) 029) 099 j 100 j 114 j 167 ) 176 ) 178) 186 ) 260) 270 j 276, 277, and 281.

HED: that had no recommended fix, have been reviewed by licensed Operations personnel and will be closed as DCRDR issues without corrective action. They are:

008, 014, 018, 019, 020, 021, 022, 024, 025, 027, 028, 030, 031, 032, 033, 034) 035, 038) 042, 045, 046 j 047 j 049 ~ 050 ~ 051 j 052 ~

053 055 057 j 058 j 063 j 064 j 066 068, 069, 070, 071, 073) 074, 077, 078, 080, 082, 083, 085, 086, 089, 090, 095, 096, 110, 123, 124, 125) 127, 128, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 154, 169, 171) 175, 177, 212, 224, 232, 245, 247, 262, 263, 265, and 279.

t ENCLOSURE 2 BROOMS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT LISTING OF COMMITHENTS The following nine iluman Engineering Discrepancies (HEDs) will be completed before unit 2 restarts:

HED 109 Difficulty in Changing Annunciator Light Bulbs Due to Panel Design HED 201 EOI-related Drywell (Torus) Pressure (Instrument Range)

HED 202 EOI Procedure Concerns liED 283 Different Zero References for Reactor Vessel Level Instrumentation HED 287 Emergency AC Lighting HED 290 EOI-related Steam Line Flow (Instrument Range) liED 292 EOI Clarity and Useability Concerns HED 299 EOI-3 Procedure Ambiguity/Deficiency HED 300 EOI-3 Entry Condition