Letter Sequence Response to RAI |
---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance
- Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement
Results
Other: ML052690388, ML052850300, ML060200084, ML060320211, ML060370508, ML060410649, ML060600122, ML060660177, ML060690026, ML060690130, ML060830564, ML060830567, ML060870126, ML060870147, ML060890080, ML060930255, ML060940146, ML060950408, ML060960563, ML060960568, ML060960602, ML061010639, ML061010644, ML061010646, ML061020614, ML061020616, ML061020638, ML061030419, ML061070304, ML061070306, ML061070307, ML061070309, ML061070310, ML061070319, ML061070321, ML061070329, ML061070395, ML061070398, ML061070399, ML061070403, ML061070429, ML061070430, ML061070432, ML061150320, ML061150330, ML061160161, ML061380647, ML061420086, ML061420088, ML061420089... further results
|
MONTHYEARML0726804681954-12-31031 December 1954 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Parks and Forestry, State Forest Service, New Jersey'S Big Trees Project stage: Other ML0726705561963-01-31031 January 1963 Us Fish and Wildlife Service, 1963. Distribution of Shellfish Resources in Relation to the New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway -- Manasquan Inlet to Little Egg Harbor. Boston, Ma. January Project stage: Other ML0726405941972-11-17017 November 1972 Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Environmental Report, Amendment 2 Project stage: Other ML0726406651978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration Project stage: Other ML0726703621978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Initial Progress Report, December 1966, Through Third Progress Report, January 1968 Project stage: Other ML0726703651978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Fourth Progress Report 1968 Through Sixth Progress Report 1970, Concluding Remarks Project stage: Other ML0726703681978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Seventh Progress Report, June 25, 1971, Through Eighth Progress Report, August 18, 1972 Project stage: Other ML0726703741978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Zooplankton of Barnegat Bay: the Effect of Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant Through Literature Cited Project stage: Other ML0726704911978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Appendix E Through Appendix F, Figure 10 Project stage: Other ML0726705501978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Appendix a Through Appendix C1, Figure C1-1 Project stage: Other ML0726801491978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Addendum to Appendix C1 Through Addendum to Appendix D1 Project stage: Other ML0726801691978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Preface Through Table 6.2-2 Project stage: Other ML0726801741978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Appendix C Continued Page C2-1 Through Page C6-51 Project stage: Other ML0726802291979-10-22022 October 1979 Letter from David N. Kinsey (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection) Dated October 22, 1979 to Ivan R. Finfrock (Jersey Central Power & Light Company), NPDES Permit Renewal Application No. NJ0005550 Project stage: Other ML0726405991982-05-14014 May 1982 Jersey Central Power & Light Co. Boundary Map of Former Finninger Farm Project stage: Other ML0726705601986-12-12012 December 1986 Inventory of New Jersey'S Estuarine Shellfish Resources, Joseph, J. W., Us Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, December 12, 1986 Project stage: Other ML0726801891987-12-0909 December 1987 Joseph, J. W. 1987, Inventory of New Jersey'S Estuarine Shellfish Resources, Us Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service. Project No. 3-405-R Project stage: Other ML0726703911989-12-31031 December 1989 Lacey Township, Ocean County, New Jersey. 1989. Ocean County Water Quality Management Plan, Wastewater Management Plan Project stage: Other ML0726704221989-12-31031 December 1989 Usda. 1989. Soil Survey of Ocean County, New Jersey. Sheet Number 45 Project stage: Other ML0610206381990-11-26026 November 1990 Drywell Containment, Attachment 1 to Letter Dated 04/07/2006 Project stage: Other ML0610206141991-03-0404 March 1991 Letter Forwarding, an ASME Section Viii Evaluation of Oyster Greek Drywell for Without Sand Case Part 1 Stress Analysis, Attachment 2 to Letter Dated 04/07/06 Project stage: Other ML0610206161992-01-16016 January 1992 Letter Forwarding, ASME Section Viii Evaluation of the Oyster Creek Drywell, Part 2, Stability Analysis, Attachment 3 to Letter Dated 04/07/2006 Project stage: Other ML0702906681992-04-24024 April 1992 Evaluation Report on Structural Integrity of the Oyster Creek Drywell with Brookhaven National Laboratory Technical Evaluation Report - Attached Project stage: Other ML0726801841997-02-0404 February 1997 State of New Jersey Permit No. 1512-93-0052.3, .4, and .5, Permit to Dredge Project stage: Other ML0726804281997-09-30030 September 1997 Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Permit Number CENAP-OP-R-199701765-39 Project stage: Other ML0726704171997-10-31031 October 1997 State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. the Management and Regulation of Dredging Activities and Dredged Material Disposal in New Jersey'S Tidal Waters. October 1997 Project stage: Other ML0726703842000-04-25025 April 2000 Levin, S. 2000. Letter, Levin (Gpu Nuclear Inc.) to New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Application for Transfer of Ownership and of a Permit Project stage: Request ML0726804482002-05-15015 May 2002 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 2002. List of State Flood Hazard Area Delineations. May 15 Project stage: Other ML0726803802003-05-15015 May 2003 Shellfish Stock Assessment of Little Egg Harbor Bay (Dsrt Proposal #2001011), Celestino, M. P., New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 15 May 2003 Project stage: Other ML0726803592003-12-31031 December 2003 Private Property and the Common Good, Anonymous, 2003, Powerpoint Presentation Project stage: Other ML0726704012004-01-31031 January 2004 Energy Information Administration. 2004. State Energy Profiles 2002. January. (Excerpt). Us Department of Energy Project stage: Other ML0726802382004-02-28028 February 2004 Clean, Safe, Reliable, the Economic Benefits of Oyster Creek Generating Station, February 2004 Project stage: Other ML0726804052004-07-0707 July 2004 Ecolsciences, Inc., 2004, Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Impact Assessment for Oyster Greek Generation Station National Security Upgrades; Township of Lacey; Ocean County, New Jersey, Prepared for Amergen Energy Co., LLC Project stage: Other ML0726704042004-12-31031 December 2004 Energy Information Administration. 2004. State Energy Data 2002: Consumption. Table 7 Energy Consumption Estimates by Source, Selected Years, 160-2002, New Jersey. Us Department of Energy Project stage: Other ML0726705522004-12-31031 December 2004 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2004 Cafra Boundary Line Project stage: Other ML0726804182004-12-31031 December 2004 Energy Information Administration, 2004, Existing Generating Units in the United States by State, Company, and Plant, 2004, Us Department of Energy Project stage: Other ML0726703942005-07-19019 July 2005 Tompkins, H.B. 2005. Letter Tompkins (State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection) to Brown (Amergen). Draft Surface Water Renewal Permit Action. Includes Public Notice, Fact Sheet, and Draft NJPDES Permit Project stage: Draft Other ML0726808302005-07-19019 July 2005 Ocean County Soil Conservation District, 2005, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Certification; Upland Dredge Site, Scd #1302 Project stage: Other ML0726802022005-07-25025 July 2005 FEMA Floodzone Map for Lacey Township, Ocean County, Nj, Provided by Birdsall Engineering, Inc Project stage: Other ML0526903882005-09-23023 September 2005 Audit and Review Plan for Plant Aging Management Reviews and Programs at the Oyster Creek Generating Station Project stage: Other ML0528503002005-10-0505 October 2005 Audit and Review Plan for Plant Aging Management Reviews and Programs at the Oyster Creek Generating Station (Tac No. MC7624) Project stage: Other ML0610703042005-10-21021 October 2005 Email: Pictures? (PA) Project stage: Other ML0531201572005-11-0101 November 2005 Position Paper on Oyster Creek Ngs Cooling Water System Project stage: Request ML0610703062005-11-0404 November 2005 Email: Emailing: Example NPDES Report.Pdf (PA) Project stage: Other ML0610703072005-11-0909 November 2005 Email: Emailing: Example NPDES Report.Pdf (PA) Project stage: Other ML0610703092005-11-0909 November 2005 Email: Emailing: Example NPDES Report.Pdf (PA) Project stage: Other ML0610704292005-11-22022 November 2005 Email: Confirmation of Site Audit Information (Ing) Project stage: Other ML0610704322005-11-22022 November 2005 Email: Archaeological Sites in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station (Ing) Project stage: Other ML0726704252005-11-30030 November 2005 Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (Asmfc). 2005. Atlantic Croaker Stock Assessment and Peer Review Reports Project stage: Other ML0610703102005-12-0505 December 2005 Email: Status of Requested Documents (PA) Project stage: Other 2002-05-15
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Legal-Correspondence
MONTHYEARML1011305402010-03-29029 March 2010 Nj Environmental Federation, Petitioners V USNRC, Respondents & Exelon Corp., Intervenor; No. 09-2567 - Petition for Review of Decisions Associated W/License Renewal of Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant ML0909303632009-04-0101 April 2009 Letter from Congressman Christopher H. Smith (D-N.J.) Requesting Postponement of Scheduled April 1, 2009 Affirmation - Served ML0909904242009-03-31031 March 2009 2009/03/31-Letter from Richard Webster License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML0912501832009-03-30030 March 2009 Commission Notification and Submission of Supplemental Information in Support of Pending Motion and Petition ML0908609012009-03-11011 March 2009 Letter from B M Carle, Township Clerk, Township of Berkeley, in County of Ocean, State of New Jersey and Resolution of the Township Council Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant ML0906808492009-03-0404 March 2009 Letter from the Secretary to Alan W. Avery, Jr. in Response to His January 2, 2009 Letter Regarding the Request of Congressman Christopher Smith'S Concerns for Structural Integrity of Oyster Creek Drywall Liner ML0906301622009-03-0202 March 2009 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response to Citizens' Motion for Leave Reply to the Staff'S Opposition to Citizens' Motion to Reopen ML0904306222009-02-12012 February 2009 Oyster Creek - Notice of Withdrawal of Marcia J. Simon ML0903604032009-02-0303 February 2009 Letter to Chariman Klein from John Adler, U.S. Congress - Request the NRC Postpone the Scheduled Affirmation Until Recommendations by Two NRC Advisory Boards Are Further Reviewed ML0903603812009-02-0303 February 2009 Letter to Chairman Klein from Christopher H. Smith, U.S. Congress, Request the NRC Postpone the Affirmation Session and Any Decision on Extending the Operating License Be Deferred Etc ML0901502932009-01-0606 January 2009 Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secy Response to Congressman Christopher H. Smith Responding to His 12/4/08 Letter Amergen'S Three-Dimensional Analysis ML0911907232008-11-17017 November 2008 USNRC, Updated Commission Notification ML0911907242008-11-17017 November 2008 USNRC, Updated Commission Notification, with Hand Written Notes ML0911905772008-11-0606 November 2008 USNRC, Amergen Energy Company, Commission Notification ML0831205422008-11-0606 November 2008 2008/11/06-Oyster Creek - Letter to Aslb Submitting Notification of Information in the Matter of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station License Renewal Application ML0831006862008-10-14014 October 2008 2008/10/14-License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. Providing Comments on SER Dated 09/19/2008, Concerning Nuclear Workers and Mental Fatigue ML0827405582008-09-25025 September 2008 Letter from the Secretary to Jill Lipoti, State of N.J.,Drywell Analysis ASLB; a Copy of Letter from Jill Lipoti to the Commission (with Cc: Judge E. Roy Hawkens, ASLB, 09/16/08) ML0826305092008-09-19019 September 2008 2008/09/19 - Oyster Creek, Safety Evaluation Report Related to License Renewal, Supplement 1 ML0826305662008-09-15015 September 2008 2008/09/15-Oyster Creek, Submittal of Original Signature of John F. O'Rourke Dated 06/11/08 Filed for License Renewal ML0825505852008-09-11011 September 2008 Memorandum by Judge E. Roy Hawkens, ASLBP to Hibiscus Films 09/18/08 Filming of Oral Argument in Toms River, N.J ML0813504892008-05-0808 May 2008 2008/05/08-In the Matter of Amergen Energy Co., LLC (License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station), State of New Jersey Has Written to NRC Staff Providing New and Significant Information That Directly Affects License Extensio ML0812904552008-05-0505 May 2008 Letter from Alex S. Polonsky Informing the Commission That on May 1, 2008, Amergen Submitted the Enclosed Response to NRC Request for Additional Information on Metal Fatigue Analysis Related to Oyster Creek ML0812903642008-05-0202 May 2008 2008/05/02-Memorandum to Chairman Klein from the Inspector General on the Subject of NRC Staff Review of License Renewal Applications ML0811603062008-04-25025 April 2008 Letter from Annette L. Vietti-Cook to the Honorable Jim Saxton and the Honorable Chris Smith in Response to Their 04/17/08 Letter ML0809406882008-04-0303 April 2008 2008/04/03 - Transmittal of 04/03/08 Notification of Information in the Matter of Oyster Creek License Renewal Application ML0805602162008-02-21021 February 2008 Memorandum from Annette L. Vietti-Cook to Luis A. Reyes Re SECY-08-0018 - Renewal of Full-Power Operating License for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML0808104622008-01-25025 January 2008 Nj Dept of Environmental Protection V. USNRC Et Al., Docket No. 07-2271 (3rd Cir) - Respondent (Amergen) Brief ML0804303392008-01-17017 January 2008 State of New Jersey V. USNRC, Et Al., No. 07-2271; Consented Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Appendix ML0804302902008-01-0303 January 2008 Nj Department of Environmental Protection V. USNRC; No. 07-2271; Consent Motion for Extension of Time and Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief ML0735321162007-12-19019 December 2007 Memorandum from Administrative Judge E. Roy Hawkens to the Office of the Secretary Enclosing the Proposed Questions Previously Submitted by the Parties to This Proceeding ML0731805062007-11-0707 November 2007 Letter from Jay M. Gutierrez to Karen Cyr Re Notice Pursuant to District of Columbia Bar Rule 1.11 ML0731114652007-11-0707 November 2007 Oyster Creek - Letter from Mary C. Baty to Administrative Judges Regarding Citizens' Motion to Strike Amergen'S Unauthorized Answer ML0728400312007-09-18018 September 2007 E-mail from Ray P. Kuyler Informing the Licensing Board That Amergen Does Not Intend to Submit Any Additional Proposed Questions to the Board Based Upon Its Review of Citizens' sur-rebuttal Testimony ML0726803722007-09-18018 September 2007 Letter from Richard Webster to Administrative Judge Hawkens Submitting Confidential Proposed Questions for the Board to Consider Asking Amergen and the NRC Staff During the Hearing in September ML0726201332007-09-18018 September 2007 Oyster Creek - Letter from Mary C. Baty Enclosing Only to the Administrative Judges the NRC Staff Proposed Questions for Evidentiary Hearing ML0725503062007-09-0505 September 2007 Letter from Richard Webster to Administrative Judge Hawkens Submitting Proposed Questions for the Board to Consider Asking Dr. Mark Hartzman During the Hearing in September ML0726900892007-08-27027 August 2007 Memorandum from E. Roy Hawkens to Sarie Horowitz Regarding Restrictions on Filming of Evidentiary Hearing by Hibiscus Films ML0724200112007-08-24024 August 2007 Letter from Alex S. Polonsky to Administrative Judge Hawkens Attaching Questions for the Board to Consider Asking Citizens' Proffered Expert, Dr. Hausler, During the Hearing in September ML0724200102007-08-21021 August 2007 Letter from R. P. Kuyler to the Secretary of the Commission Enclosing the Original Signature of Dr. Hardayal S. Mehta Supporting Part 2 of Amergen'S Rebuttal Statement of Position, Filed on 08/17/07 ML0724903652007-08-16016 August 2007 New Jersey Dept of Environmental Protection V. USNRC, Et Al., Docket No. 07-2271; Letter to Marcia Waldron Sending Copies of Motion of Consent for Second Extension of Time ML0721200332007-07-24024 July 2007 Letter from R. P. Kuyler to the Secretary of the Commission Enclosing the Original Signature of Ahmed Ouaou Supporting Part 4 of Amergen'S Pre-filed Direct Testimony Submitted on 07/20/07 ML0717601242007-06-11011 June 2007 6/11/2007 - Certified Index of the Record; State of New Jersey V. USNRC; No. 07-2271 ML0717601392007-06-0404 June 2007 6/4/2007 - Petitioner'S Notice of Appearance from State of New Jersey, Dept of Law and Public Safety V. USNRC; No. 07-2271 ML0715003252007-05-29029 May 2007 Letter from Annette L. Vietti-Cook to the Honorable Leonard T. Connors, Jr; the Honorable Christopher J. Connors; and the Honorable Brian E. Rumpf in Response to Their Letter Dated 05/04/07 (Attached) ML0713505532007-05-15015 May 2007 2007/05/15-Letter from Mitzi A. Young to Administrative Judges Enclosing the Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of the Oyster Creek Generating Station, Issued on 03/30/07 ML0715200652007-05-0808 May 2007 E-mail from Michele Donato to Richard Webster Commending Him for His Efforts in Keeping the Issues Clear and Direct Regarding the Oyster Creek Proceeding ML0715104132007-04-30030 April 2007 4/30/2007 - Service of Petition for Review for Nj Dept Env Prot Vs. NRC, Docket No. 07-2271 ML0715104202007-04-25025 April 2007 4/25/2007 - New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Petitioner V. U.S. NRC; Docket No. 07-2271 ML0712902262007-04-19019 April 2007 Letter from Betty Vasil to Chairman Klein Enclosing the Ocean County Board of Chosen Freeholders Resolution Re Oyster Creek ML0709901612007-04-0505 April 2007 Letter from Andrew L. Bates to John P. Kelly in Response to His Letter Dated 02/27/07 (Attached) 2010-03-29
[Table view] |
Text
Y-17 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Tel: 202.739.3000 Fax: 202.739.3001 www.morganlewis.com Alex S. Polonsky 202.739.5830 apolonskvy.morganlewis.com Morgan Lewis COUNSELORS AT LAW DOCKETED USNRC May 6, 2008 (9:00am)OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND FIRST CLASS MAIL May 5, 2008 The Honorable Dale E. Klein CHairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: In the Matter of AmerGen Energy Company, LLC (License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station) Docket No. 50-219-LR
Dear Chairman Klein:
The purpose of this letter is to inform the Commission that, on May 1, 2008, AmerGen Energy Company, LLC ("AmerGen")
submitted the enclosed Response to NRC Request for Additional Information on Metal Fatigue Analysis Related to Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station License Renewal Application (TAC No. MC7624) ("RAI"). A copy of AmerGen's Response to the RAI is enclosed for your information.
Copies of the Response also have been sent by e-mail and first class mail to those parties identified in the service list for this proceeding.
Sincerely, Alex S. Polonsky/62 Counsel for AmerGen Energy Company, LLC
Enclosure:
cc w/encl.: As stated Service List I-WA/2969588.
TE PL KC-y 0c3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION
)In the Matter of: ))AmerGen Energy Company, LLC ))(License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear )Generating Station) )May 5, 2008 Docket No. 50-219 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of a letter from counsel for AmerGen Energy Company, LLC ("AmerGen")
to the Honorable Dale E. Klein, Chairman, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, dated May 5, 2008, were served this day upon the persons listed below, by e-mail and first class mail. The letter forwards a copy of AmerGen's Response to NRC Request for Additional Information on Metal Fatigue Analysis Related to Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station License Renewal Application (TAC No. MC7624).Secretary of the Commission*
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 (E-mail: HEARINGDOCKET(inrc.gov)
Administrative Judge E. Roy Hawkens, Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Paneel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: erh(@nrc.gov)
Administrative Judge Paul B. Abramson Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: pbamnrc.gov)
Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington,-
DC -20555- 0001 .(E-mail: OCAAmail(anrc.gov)
I-WA/2969562.1 Administrative Judge Anthony J. Baratta Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: aib5(@nrc.gov)
John A. Covino Valerie Anne Gray Division of Law Environmental Permitting and Counseling Section P.O. Box 093 Hughes Justice Complex Trenton, NJ 08625 (E-mail: john.covinoidol.lps.state.ni.us)(E-mail: valerie.grayv(dol.lps.state.nj.us)
Richard Webster Julia LeMense Eastern Environmental Law Center 744 Broad Street, Suite 1525 Newark, NJ 07102 (E-mail: rwebster-eastemenvironmental.org)(E-mail: ilemense(ýeastemenvironmental.org)
Paul Gunter Kevin Kamps Beyond Nuclear 6930 Carroll Avenue Suite 400 Takoma Park, MD 20912 (E-mail: paulabeyondnuclear.org)(E-mail: kevin(beyondnuclear.org)
Mary C. Baty Kimberly A. Sexton James E. Adler Office of the General Counsel, 0-15D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555_(E-mail: kas2(@,nrc.gov)(E-mail: mcb 1 nrc.gov)(E-mail: jeal (@nrc.gov)
Suzanne Leta NJPIRG 11 N. Willow Street Trenton, NJ 08608 (E-mail: sleta(anipirg.org)
Emily Krause Law Clerk Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: eikl (o)nrc.gov)
- Original and 2 copies Aaphaýyl^utyler I -WA/2969562.1 2
AmerGen.Michael P. Gallaghey, PE Vice President License Renewal Projects ArnerGen 200 Exelon Way KSA/2-E Kennett Square, PA 19348 Telephone 610.765.5958 www.exeloncorp.com mfchaelp.gailagher@exeloncorp.com An Exelon Company 10 CFR 50 10 CFR 51 10 CFR 54 RA 08-046 May 1, 2008 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Oyster Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket No. 50-219
Subject:
Reference:
Response to NRC Request for Additional Information on Metal Fatigue Analysis Related to Oyster Creek Generating Station License Renewal Application (TAC No. MC7624)NRC Request for Additional Information, dated April 29, 2008, Related to Oyster Creek Generating Station License Renewal Application (TAC No. MC7624)In the referenced letter, the NRC requested AmerGen Energy Company, LLC (AmerGen) to provide additional information related to fatigue analysis performed in support of license renewal for Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS). This information was requested in the form of two questions, RAI 4.3.4-1 and RAI 4.3.4-2. The Enclosure to this letter provides AmerGen's response to these requests.If you have any questions, please contact Fred Polaski, Manager License Renewal, at 610-765-5935.
I declare under penalty of perjury that-the foregoing is true and correct.Respectfully, Executed on 05"-0 1 -1005 Michael P. Gallagher Vice President, License Renewal AmerGen Energy Company, LLC
Enclosure:
Response to RAIs 4.3.4-1 and 4.3.4-2 May 1, 2008 Page 2 of 2 cc: Regional Administrator, USNRC Region I USNRC Senior Project Manager, NRR -License Renewal, Safety USNRC Project Manager, NRR -License Renewal, Environmental USNRC Project Manager, NRR -OCGS USNRC Senior Resident -Inspector, OCGS Bureau of Nuclear Engineering, NJDEP File No. 05040 ENCLOSURE RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION FATIGUE ANALYSIS RAI 4.3.4-1-Attachment I-Attachment 2-Attachment 3 RAI 4.3.4-2
'Enclosure Page 2 of 7 RAI 4.3.4-1 The staff identified a concern regarding the methodology used by license renewal applicants to demonstrate the ability of nuclear power plant components to withstand the cyclic loads associated with plant transient operations for the period of extended operation.
The analysis methodology of concern focused on the use of a Greens function to calculate stresses used in calculating the fatigue cumulative usage factor (CUF). It involves a simplified input for applying the Green's function in which only one value of stress is used to represent the stress field of actual plant transients.
The use of this methodology requires a great deal of engineering judgment by the analyst to assure the simplification still provides conservative results. The staff understands that this methodology was used to calculate the environmentally impacted CUF for the Oyster Creek reactor recirculation outlet nozzle. The staff requests that OGCS perform an additional stress analysis of the recirculation outlet nozzle in accordance with the ASME Code,Section III, Subsection NB-3200 methodology (all six stress components are retained in the analysis) to confirm that the results of the previous Green's function evaluation is acceptable.
Provide a summary of the results which includes the following information:
- A comparison of the calculated stresses and fatigue usage factors using the Green's function evaluation and the additional confirmatory analysis for each plant transient and transient pairs that contributed to the CUF.0 The environmental factor, Fan, used to evaluate each transient pair.* A discussion of any differences in the analysis input parameters and analysis assumptions between the Green's function evaluation and the confirmatory analysis.Response to RAI 4.3.4-1 AmerGen has performed confirmatory fatigue analysis of the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) reactor pressure vessel (RPV) recirculation outlet nozzle in accordance with the ASME Code,Section III, Subsection NB-3200 methodology, utilizing all six components of stress in the analysis.
This new analysis confirms that the results of the original analysis are conservative and remain acceptable.
Table 1 compares the CUF and environmentally assisted fatigue (EAF) CUF results from the original analysis with those from the new analysis.....Table I i- Summar of-Fatigue-Usage- Results (60 Years)Nozzle Original 0.1832 5.34 0.9781 Corner New 0.0207 6.60 0.1366 Enclosure Page 3 of 7 The input parameters and assumptions used in the original analysis and the new analysis are essentially the same with the exception of those described in the four notes below. In order to facilitate NRC review, this new analysis was prepared using assumptions similar to those made by a recent applicant also performing a confirmatory analysis.
It was not the intent of the new analysis to duplicate the results of the original analysis, nor was it the intent to'remove conservatism.
Rather, the objective was to develop an independent ASME Code,Section III, Subsection NB-3200 fatigue calculation for the OCGS recirculation outlet nozzle using standard analytical methods and conventions previously accepted by the NRC to determine whether or not the original analysis results were conservative.
The following notes describe how the new analysis differs from the original analysis: 1. In the new analysis, all six components of stress were extracted from finite element analysis of all transients, which were then utilized in calculating fatigue usage factor per NB-3216.2 of Section III of the ASME Code. No Green's functions were used.Calculated stresses are comparable and CUF is lower.2. In the new analysis, the nozzle cladding was neglected for the fatigue calculation, as permitted in NB-3122.3 of Section III of the ASME Code, and the base metal was evaluated for stresses and fatigue usage. This is consistent with the method used by a recent applicant that performed a confirmatory analysis for one RPV nozzle, and is also consistent with the approach used in NUREG/CR-6260 for several component evaluations.
In the original analysis for the OCGS recirculation outlet nozzle, stresses were conservatively extracted on the stainless steel cladding surface and were evaluated using the carbon steel fatigue curve, which provided very conservative fatigue usage results.3. For the Emergency Condenser transients in the new analysis, a 10,000 second hold time was assumed between the initial downward shock in temperature and the subsequent warm-up. The original analysis did not include this hold time based on plant-specific transient evaluation.
This change was made to conservatively assure that the peak stress is captured after the downward shock and address all possible scenarios of event severity for future plant operation.
This change resulted in a higher stress for these transients in the new analysis, but this increase in stress was an insignificant contributor to fatigue usage compared to the decrease in fatigue usage described by note 2 above.4. For the new EAF analysis, detailed F,, multipliers were determined for each load pair based on maximum transient temperatures with assumed low strain rates, resulting in a maximized strain rate term for each of these Fen multipliers.
In the original EAF analysis,..... detailed Fen multipliers were determined for each load pair based upon both maximum --transient temperatures and calculated strain rates. This change was made to eliminate any possible non-conservatism in determining the strain rates and the resultant environmental fatigue multipliers for the new analysis, and to be consistent with the method used in a confirmatory analysis performed by another recent applicant.
This change resulted in an increase in the overall Fen multiplier for the OCGS recirculation outlet nozzle in the new analysis.Attachment I shows information from the original analysis, including the calculated stress, fatigue CUF, Fen multipliers, and EAF CUF values for each transient pair. Attachment 2 provides the same information from the new analysis for comparison with Attachment 1.Attachment 3 provides the transient descriptions and number of cycles associated with the transient numbers shown in both Attachment 1 and Attachment
- 2.
Enclosure Page 4 of 7 In conclusion, the original OCGS recirculation outlet nozzle EAF analysis was developed using a simplified method that utilized Green's functions to compute thermal transient stresses in which only one value of stress was used to represent the stress field. The new analysis confirms that the results of the original analysis are conservative and remain acceptable.
RAI 4~3.4-2 Confirm the reactor recirculation outlet nozzle was the only location where the Green's function (simplified calculation methodology) methodology was used to evaluate the fatigue CUF for license renewal.Response to RAI 4.3.4-2 The reactor recirculation outlet nozzle was the only location where the Green's function methodology (simplified calculation methodology) was used to evaluate the fatigue CUF for OCGS license renewal.II Attachment 1: Original Analysis Chemistry Mode: DO concentration:
% of Time: HWC 1 59%NWC 180 ppb 41%Trrie t- Vraigient S~i iWC.~4 ~2 5 42,663 ...1 7,093 0.0001 1.18E-03 -6.739 525.0 273.9 2.45 16.45 0.0012 2 3 86,760 245 7,095 0.0345 2.41 E-03 -6.029 525.0 273.9 2.45 13.46 0.2406 10 3 86,114 68 ,7,254 0.0094 5.68E-05 -6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.0417 10 1 86,083 35 7,261 0.0048 5.68E-05 -6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.0215 11 1 86,083 237 7,261 0.0326 5.68E-05 -6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.1453 11 4 85,945 1 0.0001 5.67E-05 -6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.0006 11 1 84,502 179 7,672 0.0233 5.57E-05 -6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.1038 2 1 84,294 93 '7,728 0.0120 5.55E-04 -6.908 525.0 273.9 2.45 17.25 0.1026 2 9 65,037 153, 17,990 0.0085 4.28E-04 -6.908 525.0 273.9 2.45 17.25 0.0725 10 9 64,260 95 18,740 0.0051 2.14E-04 -6.908 427.0 219.4 /2.45 7.32 0.0226 10 9 58,694 8 " 24,910 0.0003 .1.96E-04
-6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.0014 11 9 58,685 .240 24,920 0.0096 1.96E-04 -6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.0429 11 9 58,465 177 25,210 0.0070 1.95E-04 -6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.0312 11 9 58,156 71 25,630 0.0028 6.07E-04 -6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.01 23 11 9 57,879 248 i26,000 0.0095 I6.04E-94
-6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.0425 11 9 57,879 98 26,000 0.0038 6.04E-04 -6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.0168 10 9 57,850 103 26,040 0.0040 7.59E-04 -6.908 427.0 219.4 2.45 7.32 0.0176 10 9 57,748 47 26,180 0.0018 4.28E-03 -5.454 359.8 182.1 2.45 3.66 0.0053 10 9 57,748 56 26,180 0.0021 4.28E-03 -5.454 359.8 182.1 2.45 3.66 0.0063 10 9 57,697 103 !26,260 0.0039 2.52E-03 -5.983 427.0 219.4 2.45 6.33 0.0159 2 9 57,642 89 26,330 0.0034 2.63E-02 -3.637 544.7 284.9 2.45 7.51 0.0153 2 5 52,234 1 35,630 0.0000 2.39E-02 -3.736 544.7 284.9 2.45 7.74 0.0001 2 5 51.359 1 37,530 0.0000 2.35E-02 -3.753 544.7 284.9 2.45 7.78 0.0001 2 9 44,354 155 i 65,080 0.0024 2.03E-02 -3.899 544.7 284.9 2.45 8.14 0.0114 11 9 44,301 93 i65,470 0.0014 3.41E-03 -5.681 390.7 199.3 2.45 4.64 0.0048 11 12 25,420 324 11,001,000 0.0003 1.96E-03 -6.236 390.7 199.3 2.45 4.94 0.0011 11 12 25,410 196 1,006,000 0.0002 1.38E-03 -6.589 427.0 219.4 2.45 6.96 0.0008 Total, Uwo = 0.1832 Total, U 6 0-eny =0.9781 Definitions:
Overall F., = 5.34 Transient 1 = transient number for first transient in'load pair.Transient 2 = transient number for second transient in load pair.Salt = alternating stress in psi.n = number of applied cycles for load pair.Nallow = allowable number of cycles for Salt from ASME Code Section III fatigue curve.U = incremental fatigue usage for load pair, nINallow.Strain rate e-dot (%) = tensile strain rate for load pair (%).e-dot* = transformed strain rate computed in accordance with NUREG/CR-6583.
TMAX = maximum metal temperature for load pair (*F or °C).HWC Fen: Fen multiplier computed in accordancewith NUREG/CR-6583 for hydrogen water chemistry (HWC) conditions.
NWC Fen: Fen multiplier computed in accordance with NUREG/CR-6583 for normal water chemistry (NWC) conditions.
Uenv: Environmentally assisted fatigue usage factor, computed as (NWC Fen x 0.41 = HWC Fen x 0.59) x U.
Attachment 2: New Analysis Chemistry Made: DO Concentration:
HWC 1 NWC 180 ppb Definitions:
Transient 1, = transient number for first transient in load pair.Transient 2 = transient number for second transient in load pair.Salt = alternating stress in psi.n = number of applied cycles for load pair.Nallow = allowable number of cycles for Salt from ASME Code Section III fatigue curve.U = incremental fatigue usage for load pair, n/Nallow.TMAX = maximum metal temperature for load pair .(°F or °C).HWC Fen: Fen multiplier computed in accordance with NUREG/CR-6583 for hydrogen water chemistry (HWC) conditions.
NWC Fen: Fen multiplier computed in accordance,'with NUREG/CR-6583 for normal water chemistry (NWC) conditions.
Uenv: Environmentally assisted fatigue usage factor, computed as (NWC Fen x 0.41 = HWC Fen x 0.59) x U.
/Attachment 3: Transient Descriptions Notes: For the original analysis, these transients were grouped with the Shutdown Transient.
For original analysis, 103 cycles of Emergency Condenser Initiation and 417 cycles of Emergency Condenser Subsequent Actuation were conservatively evaluated, compared to 77 cycles and 443 cycles, respectively, in the new analysis.