ML20140E914: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML20140E914 | |||
| issue date = 03/06/1986 | |||
| title = Insp Rept 50-458/86-05 on 860127-31.Violation Noted:Failure to Maintain Calibr Records of Gas Chromatograph While Performing Tech Spec Required Surveillance | |||
| author name = Murray B, Nicholas J, Wise R | |||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) | |||
| addressee name = | |||
| addressee affiliation = | |||
| docket = 05000458 | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| case reference number = RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-2.B.3, TASK-TM | |||
| document report number = 50-458-86-05, 50-458-86-5, NUDOCS 8603280233 | |||
| package number = ML20140E887 | |||
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS | |||
| page count = 18 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000458/1986005]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | |||
. . | |||
APPENDIX B | |||
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGION IV | |||
NRC Inspection Report: 50-458/86-05 License: NPF-47 | |||
Docket: 50-458 | |||
Licensee: Gulf States Utilities (GSU) | |||
P. O. Box 2951 | |||
Beaumont, Texas 77704 | |||
Facility Name: River Bend Station (RBS) | |||
Inspection At: River Bend Station, St. Francisville, Louisiana | |||
Inspection Conducted: January 27-31, 1986 | |||
Inspectors: /IAk. /Ait2// | |||
J. Blair Nicholas, Radiation Specialist, Dtte | |||
& Facilities Radiological Protection Sect on | |||
0fdin19Mbvuxb/ | |||
R'ussell Wise, 'Radiatiori Specialist, Facilit !es | |||
5 6/B6 | |||
0' ate' | |||
d. Radiological Protection Section | |||
Approved: OfqJMlA{[/// M/[[ | |||
BlaineMurray,~ Chief,facilitiesRadiological D' ate | |||
Protection Section | |||
Inspection Summary | |||
Inspection Conducted January 27-31, 1986 (Report 50-458/86-05') | |||
Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection of the licensee's water chemistry | |||
and radiochemistry programs including: review of organization and management | |||
control, staffing and staff qualifications, training program, facilities and | |||
equipment, NUREG-0737, Item II.B.3, postaccident sampling system (PASS), quality | |||
assurance (QA) program of chemistry / radiochemistry activities, quality control | |||
of analytical measurements, radiochemistry and whole body counting system | |||
confirmatory measurements. The inspection involved 78 inspector-hours onsite by | |||
two NRC inspectors. | |||
Results: Within the areas inspected, one violation was identified (see paragraph 6). | |||
Two previously identified open items were closed. | |||
P | |||
%h | |||
O | |||
, - .. | |||
. . | |||
2 | |||
DETAILS | |||
1. Persons Contacted | |||
GSU | |||
*W. J. Cahill, Senior Vice President , RBS Nuclear Group | |||
*J. C. Deddens, Vice President, RBS Nuclear Group- | |||
*T. F. Plunkett, Plant Manager | |||
*T. D. Burnett, Plant Chemist' | |||
*S. V. Desai, Chemical Engineer | |||
~*J. W. Evans, Stenographer | |||
*K. J. Giadrosich, Operations - QA | |||
*D. P.. Gipson, Assistant Plant Manager - Operations | |||
*R. E. Horn, Nuclear Training Representative | |||
*R. J. King, Lkensing Engineer | |||
*W. J. Lambert, Systems Engineer | |||
*G. D. Lipham, Chemistry Foreman | |||
A. _S. Maryman, Nuclear Chemistry Technician | |||
R. L. McCann, Nuclear Chemistry Tectnician | |||
*J. H. McQuirter, Licensing Engineer | |||
*C. .L. Nash, Chemistry Supervisor | |||
, D. M. Ross, Radiological Health Specialist | |||
R. J. Shah, QA Engineer | |||
*J.- E. Somerindyke, Corporate Security | |||
J. E. Spivey,-QA Engineer | |||
*P. F. Tomlinson, Director, Quality Services | |||
W. K. Woodcox, Chemistry Foreman | |||
Others | |||
*D. D. Chamberlain, NRC Senior Resident Inspector | |||
W. B. Jones, NRC Resident Inspector- | |||
* Denotes those present-during the exit briefing on January.3.1, 1986. | |||
The NRC inspectors also interviewed several'other RBS employees during the | |||
inspection. | |||
2. , Licensee ~ Action on Previous-Inspection Findings | |||
. | |||
(Closed) Open Item (458/8422-05): Postaccident Sampling System _- This item | |||
involved the lack of. PASS operation verification by collecting reactor | |||
water and contair. ment atmosphere samples, performing required analyses, and | |||
completing training of nuclear chemistry technicians.on PASS. The NRC j | |||
senior resident inspector witnessed a demonstration of the licensee's : | |||
ability to provide representative reactor water samples using the manual | |||
grab PASS on November 10, 1985. The NRC inspector during this inspection- .l | |||
also witnessed a similar demonstration and verified that the' licensee's | |||
PASS and associated procedures satisfy the requirements of NUREG-C737, | |||
Item II.B.3. The licensee had completed technician training on.the PASS ' | |||
-. , - | |||
. . | |||
3 | |||
, | |||
for 10 nuclear chemistry technicians. The li'censee's methods, analytical | |||
sensitivities, and analytical results of chemistry parameters are | |||
consistent with PASS requirements. This item is considered closed. | |||
(Closed) Open Item (458/8422-06): Facilities, Equipment, and Supplies -- | |||
! | |||
This item involved the completion of construction, testing, calibration'of | |||
' | |||
process instrumentation, and the routine.~use of the' chemistry sample panels | |||
and-associated process instrumentation. The NRC inspectors inspected the - | |||
various chemistry sampling areas including the reactor water sample panel, | |||
turbine. plant sample panel, condensate demineralizer sample panel, makeup | |||
water sample panel, radwaste sample panel, and fuel building. sample panel. | |||
The NRC inspectors determined that all the sampling panels had been tested | |||
and calibrations had been performed on associated process instrumentation | |||
in accordance with RBS procedures and that all sampling areas were in | |||
j reutine operation. This item is considered closed. | |||
4 3. Inspector Observations | |||
The following are observations the NRC inspectors discussed with the | |||
licensee during the inspection and at the exit' interview on January 31, | |||
1986. These observations are neither violations nor unresolved items. | |||
These items were recommcnded for licensee consideration for program | |||
improvement, but they have no' specific regulatory requirement. The | |||
licensee stated the items would be reviewed. | |||
o Confirmatory Measurements - The percent agreement between the licensee | |||
and NRC were below the expected values for these kinds of measurements | |||
(see paragraph 12.b). | |||
4. Chemistry / Radiochemistry Organization and Managemer.t Controls | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's organization and staffing of the | |||
chemistry / radiochemistry section (C/RS) to determine compliance with | |||
commitments in Chapter 13 of the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and | |||
the requirements in Section 6.2.of the Technical Specifications (TS) and | |||
in RBS procedures. | |||
The NRC inspectors verified that the organizational structure of the C/RS | |||
was as defined in the FSAR, TS, and RBS procedures. The NRC inspectors | |||
reviewed the RBS management control procedures and position descriptions | |||
for the assignment of. responsibilities for the management and implementa- | |||
tion of the RBS. chemistry / radiochemistry program. The NRC inspectors | |||
verified that the administrative control responsibilities specified by the | |||
RBS procedures were being implemented. | |||
' | |||
' | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the staffing of the_C/RS and noted that since | |||
the previous NRC chemistry / radiochemistry inspection in June 1985, the C/RS | |||
had lost its lead chemist and~one' chemistry foreman. The chemistry foreman | |||
position had been filled by one of the plant chemists and the vacated' plant | |||
chemist position had been filled by one of the senior nuclear chemistry | |||
l | |||
, __. _ | |||
. , . _ . - _ | |||
. . _ - | |||
. . | |||
4 | |||
technicians leaving 15 nuclear chemistry technician positions filled and | |||
one vacancy. At the time of the inspection, the lead chemist position was | |||
temporarily filled with a qualified contractor. The chemistry supervisor | |||
was recruiting to fill the staff vacancies. | |||
No violations or deviations were identified. | |||
5. Chemistry / Radiochemistry' Personnel Qualifications | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the qualifications of the C/RS personnel to | |||
determine compliance with commitments in Chapter 13 of the FSAR and the | |||
requirements in Section 6.3 of the TS and in RBS procedures. | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the resumes of each of .he C/RS personnel and | |||
verified that they met the required qualifications specified in the FSAR, | |||
TS, RBS procedures, and position descriptions. The NRC inspectors | |||
determined that the licensee had an' adequate staff to meet shift staffing | |||
. requirements. | |||
No violations or deviations were identified. | |||
6. Chemistry / Radiochemistry Training Program | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's chemistry / radiochemistry | |||
training program to determine complianca with commitments in Chapter 13.2 | |||
of the FSAR and the requirements in Section 6.4 of the TS, 10 CFR | |||
Part 19.12, and in RBS procedures. | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's program for training and | |||
qualification of RBS C/RS personnel as described in the nuclear training | |||
department procedures and in RBS Chemistry Section Procedure. | |||
The.NRC inspectors reviewed the C/RS individual staff training matrix | |||
records and determined that nine chemistry technicians had completed all | |||
matrix training requirements and six chemistry technicians were in the | |||
process of completing the general RBS systems training and PASS hands-on | |||
analysis training. | |||
No violations or deviations were identified. | |||
7. Chemistry / Radiochemistry Program | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's chemistry / radiochemistry program | |||
to determine compliance with commitments in Chapters 5, 9, and 11 of the | |||
FSAR and the requirements in Section 3/4.4.4 of the TS.and in C/RS procedures. | |||
The NRC inspectors' review of the chemistry / radiochemistry program found | |||
that the licensee nad completed and approved all identified administrative | |||
procedures, surveillance procedures, chemical control procedures, instrument | |||
t | |||
i | |||
,_. | |||
. . | |||
5 | |||
calibration and performance check procedures, sampling procedures, and | |||
analytical procedures. A review of selected procedures, logs, and analyt- | |||
ical data indicated that the C/RS had established sufficient administrative | |||
a1d analytical procedures to meet the requirements of the FSAR and TS. | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the calibration and qua'ity control program | |||
for the secondary chemistry laboratory instruments and primary chemistry | |||
laboratory instruments. Laboratory instrument calibration and performance | |||
check data and other documentation of instrument performance were reviewed. | |||
During the review of instrument calibration data, it was noted that the | |||
licensee'had not documented any calibrations performeo on the Fisher | |||
Model 1200 gas chromatograph when performing hydrogen analysis of the | |||
offgas hydrogen recombiner effluent. The rnalysis. procedure COP-0425, | |||
" Determination of H2and 0 Gas | |||
2 Concentration - Gas Chromatography Method," | |||
Revision 1, July 25, 1985, requires in paragraph 8.3 that calibration | |||
standard data be recorded on the appropriate chemistry log. The fraquency | |||
of calibration .'or the gas chromatograph, prior to each use, and appropriate | |||
chemistry log, 50ul.1.7.4, are specified in CSP-121, "Chcmistry Laboratory | |||
Instrument Surveillance," Revision 1, December-22, 1985. The NRC inspectors | |||
determined on January 29, 1986, that the gas chromatograph had been used to | |||
perform 57 hydrogen analyses of the offgas hydrogen recombiner effluent, | |||
while the offgas explosive gas monitoring system was inoperable, during the | |||
period January 14-26, 1986. A review of the TS surveillance report form | |||
for procedure N P-0100, " Chemical / Radiochemical Technical Specifications | |||
Surveillances," Revision 1, December 20, 1985, completed during the above | |||
specified period showed that the offgas hydrogen recombiner effluent had | |||
been sampled and analyzed every 4 hours for hydrogen concentration .to | |||
satisfy Technical Specification Table 3.3.7.11-1, Action 123, without the | |||
required gas chromatograph calibration data being documented. Technical | |||
Specification 6.10.2.d requires that records be retained for at least 5 | |||
years of surveillance activities, inspections, and calibrations required | |||
by the TS. The licensee's failure to maintain calibration records of the | |||
gas chromatograph while performing a TS required surveillance is considered | |||
an apparent violation of TS 6.10.2.d. (458/8605-01). | |||
8. Facilities and-Equipment | |||
The NRC inspectors inspected the facilities and equipment / supplies used by | |||
the C/RS staff. The following facilities were inspected: cold laboratory, | |||
radiochemistry laboratory, radiochemistry counting room, various chemistry | |||
sampling panels, and PASS sample preparation area. The licensee had | |||
completed construction in all the areas inspected. The laboratories were | |||
equipped with the necessary chemicals, reagents, standards, labware, and | |||
analytical instrumentation to perform the required analytical procedures. | |||
The installation of the. various chemistry sampling panels was completed and | |||
the associated process instrumentation had been tested and' calibrated and | |||
was routinely operational. The PASS sample preparation area adjacent to | |||
the radiochemistry laboratory was equipped ano functional. | |||
No violations or deviations were identified. | |||
I o | |||
-. - -. | |||
. .. . | |||
6 | |||
, | |||
'9. Postaccident.Samplina System | |||
The NRC . inspectors reviewed the licensee's PASS to determine compliance | |||
with the requirements of NUREG-0737, Item II.B.3, and Section 6.8.4.c | |||
of the TS. | |||
, | |||
' | |||
The NRC inspectors inspected the area.in the plant where the PASS hardware | |||
had been installed. The NRC inspectors verified _that the equipment and | |||
associated procedures satisfied the requirements of NUREG-0737, Item II.B.3, | |||
and the TS for representative sampling and analysis of reactor water and | |||
containment atmosphere follcwing a reactor incident. The licensee had | |||
completed PASS operator training for 10 C/RS technicians as part of their | |||
shift qualification. Five remaining C/RS technicians'will receive PASS | |||
operator training as soon as current PASS operating procedure revisions are | |||
approved. The NRC inspectors witnessed the initial monthly chemistry | |||
surveillance of PASS in accordance with Chemistry Section Procedure, | |||
CSP-0150, " Chemistry Surveillance of the Post-Accident Sampling System | |||
(PASS)," Revision 1, January 2, 1986. The licensee demonstrated PASS | |||
operability by collecting a simulated sample of reactor water using | |||
demineralized flush water due to the status of the plant at 10 percent | |||
power and plant operations having many systems isolated to assist in | |||
diagnosing plant operating problems.. The licensee also collected a sample | |||
from the containment building. The licensee prepared these samples for.the | |||
required analyses in accordance with approved procedures. -However, due to | |||
the nature of these samples, analyses were not performed during this | |||
inspection. As discussed in NRC Inspection Report 50-458/85-77, the PASS | |||
had been demonstrated operable on November 10, 1985, by the taking of two | |||
liquid samples from the jet pump header. | |||
, | |||
i The licensee analyzed the first sample for pH, dissolved oxygen, dissolved | |||
; hydrogen, boron, conductivity, and radionuclides'within 3 hours from the | |||
i time the decision was made to take the samples as required by NUREG-0737. | |||
i | |||
The NRC inspectors determined that the licensee's procedures, analytical | |||
sensitivities, and analytical results of chemi_stry parameters were | |||
! consistent with PASS requirements. | |||
No violations or deviations were identified. | |||
L | |||
10. Quality Assurance Program | |||
The NRC inspectors revi sed the licensee's QA audit / surveillance program | |||
regarding chemistry /radicciemistry activities to determine compliance | |||
with commitments in Chapter 17 of the FSAR and the requirements in | |||
Section 6.5.3.8 of the-TS and related RBS QA procedures. | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the QA department organization, selected QA | |||
audit and surveillance procedures, audit schedule for 1986, QA audits | |||
l qualifications, and audit and surveillance reports. The licensee completed | |||
an audit of the chemistry / radiochemistry program on June 6,1985, which was- | |||
reviewed in NRC Inspection Report (458/85-47). The NRC inspectors noted | |||
l _ ._- - _ . . . . _ _ _ _ | |||
. . | |||
7 | |||
that the next chemistry / radiochemistry program audit is scheduled for | |||
May 1986. . Reports generated from surveillances performed during 1985 in | |||
the areas of chemistry / radiochemistry TS surveillance requirements were | |||
reviewed for scope to ensure thoroughness of program evaluation. The NRC | |||
_ | |||
inspectors found the QA surveillance program adequate and responses and | |||
corrective actions to surveillance findings timely. | |||
No violations'or deviations were identified. | |||
11. Quality Control of Radiological Analytical Measurements | |||
The NRC inspectors inspected the radiochemistry counting room and reviewed | |||
the licensee's program for calibration and quality control of radiological | |||
analytical measurements to determine compliance with the requirements in | |||
Sections 6.8 and 6.10 of the TS. | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's records, for the period July | |||
through December 1985, involving instrument surveillance procedures', | |||
instrument calibration and quality control procedures, counting instrument | |||
calibration and performance check data, and other documentation of | |||
instrument ~ performance. | |||
No violations or deviations were identified. | |||
12. Analytical Measurements | |||
a. Confirmatory Measurements | |||
Confirmatory measurements were performed on the following standards | |||
and samples in the NRC Region IV mobile laboratory at'RBS during the | |||
inspection: | |||
(1) NRC Face Loaded Scott Charcoal Cartridge Standard | |||
(SRS-17817-109) | |||
(2) NRC Particulate Filter Standard (SRS-17818-109) | |||
(3) Simulated Liquid Radwaste (1 Liter Marinelli Beaker) | |||
(4) Reactor Coolant System Liquid (1 Liter Poly Bottle) | |||
(5) Reactor Coolant System Tritium Sample | |||
The confirmatory measurements test consisted of comparing measurements | |||
made by the licensee and the N'lC mobile laboratory. The NRC's mobile | |||
laboratory measurements are referenced to the National Bureau of | |||
Standards (NBS) by laboratory intercomparisons. Confirmatory measure- | |||
ments are made only for those nuclides identified by the NRC as being | |||
present in concentrations greater than 10 percent of the respective | |||
isotopic values for' liquid and gas concentrations as stated in 10 CFR | |||
Part 20, Appendix B, Table II. Attachment I contains the criteria used | |||
to compare results. | |||
. . | |||
8 | |||
b. Results | |||
The licensee maintains four germanium-lithium ~ detectors in the | |||
radiochemistry counting room. At the time of the inspection, two of | |||
.the detectors were out-of-service due to electronic malfunctions. All | |||
four detectors.are used for routine isotopic analysis of radioactive | |||
samples to demonstrate compliance with TS and regulatory requirements. | |||
The analytical results from the two detectors were compared with the | |||
NRC results, as well as with each other. The licensee performed the | |||
tritium analysis on their liquid scintillation counting system. The | |||
individual sample analyses and comparison of analytical results of the | |||
confirmatory measurements are tabulated in Attachment 2. | |||
The licensee's gamma isotopic results from the listed samples in | |||
Attachment 2 showed 82 percent agreement with the NRC analysis results | |||
based on 61 agreement results out of 74.nuclides identified and | |||
compared. The 82 percent agreement results between the licensee and | |||
NRC are below the value that would be expected for an effective radio- | |||
chemistry program. The normally expected agreement would be greater | |||
than 90 percent. The comparative measurements'results were discussed | |||
with the licensee during the exit interview on January 31, 1986. The | |||
licensee stated that their radiochemistry program.would be reviewed in | |||
an attempt to improve their measurement capabilities. The licensee's | |||
tritium result on the reactor coolant system sample was in agreement | |||
with the NRC analysis result. | |||
Confirmatory measurements were performed by the licensee on a liquid | |||
unknown samp?e prepared by the Radiological Environmental Sciences | |||
Laboratory (RESL) in Idaho Falls, Idaho using known nuclide concen- | |||
trations of 893p, 903p, 3g, 137Cs, and 50Co. The licensee's analytical | |||
results were compared to the known sample activities and the results | |||
of the comparisons are presented in Attachment 2, sample 6. The | |||
licensee's results were in 100 percent agreement with the certified | |||
activities for 3H, 187Cs, and 60Co in the sample. The analytical | |||
results for 895r and 90Sr were not available from the licensee's | |||
contractor laboratory at the time of the inspection. | |||
No violations or deviations were identified. | |||
13. Whole Body Counting System | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's " standup" whole body counting | |||
system (WBCS) to determine compliance with 10 CFR Part 20.103. The | |||
licensee maintains a shadow shield bed type WBCS also. | |||
The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's program for operation,. calibration, | |||
and quality control of the " standup" WBCS and found it adequate. The | |||
licensee had calibrated the " standup" WBCS using sources of common nuclides | |||
found in nuclear power facilities which represented vari.ous percentages of | |||
maximum permissible organ burdens. The licensee's sources were traceable | |||
to the NBS and were.used in a masonite phantom supplied by the vendor-of | |||
the WBCS. | |||
, | |||
. . | |||
9 | |||
, | |||
The NRC inspectors supplied the licensee with a whole body counting | |||
phantom to perform confirmatory measurements in.' the " standup" WBCS. The | |||
phantom and counting arrangements were described in NRC Inspection | |||
Report 50-458/85-17. The phantom was-stood. upright on a support in the | |||
WBCS during the measurements. The results of the body positioning ~ test | |||
and the. comparison of the analytical results of the confirmatory measurecents- | |||
against the standard activities are tabulated in Attachment 3. | |||
The licensee analyzed the nuclide~ activities riositioned in the NRC phantom | |||
a to simulate inhalation as " mock f odine"~ in the thyroid and soCo in the | |||
lungs. The NRC inspectors checked the licensee's accuracy of body positioning | |||
in the " standup" WBCS and found the reproducibility of measurements | |||
satisfactory. The results of the body burden activity measurements taken | |||
resulted in several observations regarding the " standup" WBCS. These | |||
observations include the following: | |||
~ | |||
a. The licensee's results for 5 percent through two organ burdens of | |||
, | |||
6oCo in 'the right lung ranged from 14 percent higher to 25 percent | |||
lower than the certified activities of the NRC standards with increasing | |||
organ burdens. (See Tests (4)-(8)). These results are more accurate | |||
than the results of similar previous tests performed on the licensee's | |||
shadow shield style WBCS. (See NRC Inspection Report 50-458/85-17). | |||
b. The licensee's results~for 5 percent through two organ burdens of | |||
133Ba as " mock iodine" in the thyroid were nonconservative and were | |||
approximately 40 percent low 3r than the certified activities of the | |||
NRC standards. (See Tests (9)-(13)). These results are more | |||
consistent and overall more accurate than the results of similar | |||
previous tests performed on the licensee's shadow shield style | |||
WBCS which showed results ranging from 40 percent lower to 300 | |||
percent higher than the certified activities over the same organ | |||
! -burden range. (See NRC Inspection Report 50-458/85-17). | |||
c. The licensee was able to analyze most accurately a 5 percent organ | |||
burden of 233Ba as " mock iodine" in the thyroid in the presence of a | |||
5 percent organ t,urden of 80Co in the lungs. (See Test (17)). The | |||
other combinations of activity concentrations tested of " mock iodine" | |||
' | |||
in the thyroid and 80Co in lungs gave results indicating the thyro'<i | |||
, | |||
. activity approximately 50 percent lower than the certified activi | |||
' | |||
values. (See Tests (14), (15), (16), and (18)). | |||
The licensee was informed of the analytical results of the confirmatory | |||
measurements. | |||
. | |||
No violations or deviations were identified. | |||
14. . Exit Briefina | |||
The NRC inspectors met with the NRC senior resident inspector and the | |||
licensee representatives identified in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the- | |||
: inspection on January 31, 1986. The lead NRC inspector summarized the | |||
' | |||
scope of the inspection, discussed the inspection findings,.and presented | |||
the results of the confirmatory measurements. | |||
, | |||
, - - ,. , -- ~v - r w, , | |||
_ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
. | |||
. . | |||
ATTACHMENT 1. | |||
Criteria ^for Comparing Analytical Measurements | |||
The following are the criteria used in comparing the results of capability | |||
tests and verification measurements. The criteria are based on an empirical | |||
relationship established through prior experience and this program's-analytical | |||
requirements. | |||
In these criteria, the' judgement limits vary in. relation to the comparison of | |||
the resolution. | |||
NRC VALUE | |||
Resolution = | |||
NRC UNCERTAINTY | |||
Ratio = LICENSEE VALUE | |||
NRC VALUE | |||
Comparisons are made by.first determining the resolution ~and then reading across | |||
the same line to the corresponding ratio. The following table shows the | |||
acceptance' values. | |||
RESOLUTION AGREEMENT RATIO | |||
<4- 0.4 - 2.5 | |||
4-7 0.5 - 2.0 | |||
8 - 15 0.6 - 1.66 | |||
16 -50 0.75 - 1.33 | |||
51 - 200 0.80 - 1.25 | |||
>200 0.85 - 1.18 | |||
The above criteria are applied to the following analyses: | |||
(1) Gamma Spectrometry. | |||
(2) Tritium analyses of liquid samples. | |||
(3) Iodine on adsorbers. | |||
(4) 895r and 995r determinations. | |||
(5) Gross Beta where samples are counted on the same date using the same' | |||
reference nuclide. | |||
. __ . _ _ , . . _._ | |||
f | |||
. . | |||
-ATTACHMENT 2 | |||
; | |||
Confirmatory Measurements:Results | |||
< | |||
. | |||
1. NRC Face Lo'ded | |||
a Scott Charcoal Cartridge Standard (SRS-17817-109) | |||
; | |||
(Standardized 11:00 CST, July 1,1985) | |||
RBS RBS Results- NRC-Results. RBS/NRC. Comparison | |||
; Nuclide Det. -(uCi/ sample) (uCi/ sample) Ratio Decision | |||
! | |||
' | |||
57Co- (1) =1.8210.08E-02 1.8910.01E-02 0.96' Agreement | |||
(2) 2.0110.09E-02 '1.06 Agreement | |||
60Co #1) 4.74 0.16E-02 4.8710.02E-02 0.97 Agreement | |||
; | |||
(2) ~5.02 0.17E-02 1.03 Agreement | |||
asY (1) 1.0810.04E-01 1.1410.01E-01 0.95 Agreement | |||
j (2) 1.1510.05E-01 1.01 ' Agreement | |||
109Cd- (1) 1.1710.09E+00 1.1910.003E+0 0.98 Ngreement' | |||
7 (2) 1.2610.10E+00 1.06 . Agreement | |||
! | |||
, 11aSn (1) 6.8210.39E-02 7.3810.04E-02 0.92 Agreement | |||
1 (2) 7.5810.43E-02 1.03 Agreement | |||
'137Cs (1) 4.4010.24E-02 4.4410.02E-02 0.99 Agreement | |||
(2) 4.8210.27E-02 1.09 Agreement | |||
139Ce (1). 3.1210.21E-02 3.5310.02E-02 0.88 Agreement ' | |||
, | |||
(2) 3.4710.23E-02 0.98 Agreement | |||
zosHg (1) 6.9510.59E-02 7.2110.11E-02 0.96 Agreement | |||
(2) 7.6110.64E-02 | |||
. | |||
1.05 Agreement | |||
l 2. .NRC Particulate Filter Standard (SRS-17818-109) | |||
; (Standardized 11:00 CST, July 1, -1985) | |||
i | |||
RBS RBS Results NRC Results RBS/NRC Comparison | |||
j- Nuclide Det. (uCi/ sample) (uCi/ sample) . Ratio Decision | |||
! | |||
57Co (1) 3.8010.08E-02 1.9510.01E-02 0.92 Agreement | |||
(2) 1.6210.07E-02 0.83 Agreement | |||
80Co (1) 4.'6810.16E-02 4.6410.02E-02 1. 01' ' Agreement | |||
; (2) 4.5210.16E-02 0.97 Agreement | |||
asY (1) 1. 0810. 04E-01 1.0710.01E-01' 1~. 01 Agreement | |||
.(2) 1.0410.04E-01 0.98 Agreement | |||
; 109Cd (1) 1.1210.09E+00 1.32 0.003E+0 0.85 Agreement | |||
(2) 1.0310.08E+00 0.78 Disagreement | |||
113Sn (1) 7.0210.40E-02 6.8810.04E-02- 1.02 Agreement. | |||
j .(2) 6.4810.37E-02 0.94 Agreement | |||
: | |||
1 | |||
. - . .._. .- , - , , , , . . , . - - - - . , _ , - -- - , ,.n - . - -. . - - .-- . | |||
. . | |||
2 | |||
137Cs (1) 4.4310.24E-02 4.1110.02E-02 1.08 Agreement | |||
(2) 4.19 0.23E-02 1.02 Agreement | |||
139Ce (1) 3.0510.20E-02 3.34 0.01E-02 0.91 Agreement | |||
(2) 2.81 0.19E-02 0.84 Disagreement | |||
203Hg (1) 6.6110.56E-02 5.9510.08E-02 1.11 Agreement | |||
(2) 6.0210.52E-02 1.01 Agreement | |||
3. Simulated Liquid Radwaste (1 Liter Marinelli Beaker) | |||
(Sampled 14:30 CST, January 28,.1986) | |||
RBS RBS Results NRC Results RBS/NRC Comparison | |||
Nuclide Det. (uCi/ml) (uCi/ml) Ratio Decision | |||
24Na (1) 4.74 0.24E-05 4.4810.05E-05 1.06 Agreement | |||
(2) 4.63 0.23E-05 1.03 Agreement | |||
51Cr (1). 1.4310.28E-05 1.5310.27E-05 0.94 Agreement | |||
(2)- 1.9310.34E-05 1.27 Agreement | |||
54Mn (1) 7.2610.42E-06 7.1810.22E-06 1.01 Agreement | |||
(2) 7.03i0.43E-06 0.98 Agreement | |||
' | |||
56Mn (1) 1.4010.06E.04 1.2510.03E-04 1.13 Agreement | |||
(2) 1.3510.06E-04 1.09 Agreement | |||
ssCo (1) 2.5410.22E-06 3.7810.19E-06 - | |||
No Comparison 1/ | |||
(2) 2.3810.23E-06 - | |||
No Comparison I/ | |||
64Cu (1) 2.6910.15E-03 2.7710.06E-03 0.97 Agreement | |||
(2) 2.65 0.15E-03 0.96 Agreement | |||
97Nb (1) Not Identified 2/ 2.01 0.02E-04 - | |||
Disagreement | |||
(2) NotIdentified]/ Disagreement | |||
99"Tc (1) Not Identif ed 2/ 2.1510.04E-05 - | |||
Disagreement | |||
(2) NotIdentified2/ - | |||
Disagreement | |||
99Mo (1) 1.3710.08E-05 8.20il.01E-06 1.67 Disagreement | |||
(2) 1.48i0.09E-05 1.80 Disagreement | |||
122Sb (1) 9.8110.71E-06 7.3310.21E-06 1.34 ,Disaoreement | |||
(2) 8.5310.68E-06 1.16 Agreement | |||
, | |||
132I (1) 3.0810.13E-05 2.7610.07E-05 1.12 Agreement | |||
(2) 2.8310.18E-05 1.03 Agreement | |||
133I (1)- Not Identified 3/ 2.9310.20E-06 - | |||
Disagreement | |||
(2) 1.9310.26E-07 0.07 Disagreement | |||
1851 (1) 1.9710.75E-06 2.0910.76E-06 0.94 Agreement | |||
(2) 2.6010.77E-06 1.24 Agreement | |||
. - - . .= . - - -. . - | |||
. . | |||
3 | |||
187W (1) 2.9010.62E-06 2.0610.87E-06 - | |||
No Comparison 1/ | |||
(2) 3.39 0.59E-06 - | |||
No Comparison 1/ | |||
j | |||
]/ Nuclide concentration' determined by the NRC was less than 10 percent | |||
of the isotopic value stated in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table-II; | |||
therefore, no comparison was made. | |||
~ | |||
l | |||
'2/ Nuclide was not identified by the . licensee because it was not included | |||
in the isotope library used for the analysis. | |||
4 | |||
3/ Isotopic peak was present 'n the: spectral data;-however, the licensee's | |||
peak confidence level for peak identification had been established so | |||
as not to allow analysis.of nuclides at sensitivity levels equal to 10 | |||
l | |||
percent of the isotopic values stated in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, , | |||
t Table II, Column 2. | |||
4. Reactor Coolant System Liquid (1 Liter Poly Bottle) | |||
(Sampled 16:30 CST, January 28, 1986) | |||
RBS RBS Results NRC Results RBS/NRC Comparison | |||
Nuclide Det. (uCi/ml) -(uCi/ml) - Ratio Decision | |||
24Na (1) 1.8010.10E-04 1.6710.03E-04 1.08 Agreement | |||
(2) 1.7610.10E-04 1.05- Agreement | |||
51Cr (1) 7.4711.68E-05 5.8210.78E-05 1.28 Agreement | |||
< | |||
-(2) 8.84 1.57E-05 1.52 Agreement | |||
s4Mn (1) 2.2710.18E-05 1.8610.06E-05 1.22 Agreement | |||
(2) 2.1410.17E-05 -1.16 Agreement | |||
56M7 (1) 3.3910.56E-04 3.1310.41E-04 1.08 Agreement | |||
(2) 3.6010.60E-04 1.15 Agreement | |||
58C0 (1) 9.28tl.13E-06 9.2610.50E-06 1.00 Agreement | |||
(2) 1.1510.12E-05 1.25' Agreement | |||
64Cu (1) 1.0610.08E-02 8.4910.32E-03 1.25 Agreement | |||
(2) 1.0610.09E-02 1. 2r Agreement | |||
89Mo (1) 4.2010.29E-05 3.1210.34E-05 1.35 Agreement | |||
(2) 3.7410.26E-05 1.20 Agreement | |||
1225b (1) 5.0510.39E-05 2.0410.07E-05 2.48 Disagreement' | |||
(2) 3.6310.31E-05 1.78- Disagreement | |||
4 | |||
187W (1) 1.7610.44E-05 9.5812.04E-06 1.83 Agreement | |||
(2) 1.5910.71E-05 1.66 Agreement | |||
i | |||
e | |||
F* | |||
* | |||
l . * < | |||
. . | |||
4 | |||
5. Reactor Coolant System Tritium Sample | |||
(Sampled 14:00 CST, January 27, 1986) | |||
RBS Result N.'tC Result RBS/NRC Comparison | |||
Nuclide (uCi/ml) (uCi/ml) Ratio Decision | |||
3H 8.5610.31E-05 11.1010.59E-05 0.77 Agreement | |||
6. RESL Unknown Liquid Sample | |||
(Standardized 12:00 MST, January 11, 1985) | |||
RBS Results NRC Results RBS/NRC. Comparison | |||
Nuclide- (uCi/ml) (uCi/ml) Ratio Decision | |||
3H 4.9610.49E-05 4.5610.09E-05 1.08 Agreement | |||
88Sr 2/ - | |||
No. Comparison | |||
8 Sr 2/ - | |||
No Comparison | |||
137Cs 7.62il.03E-06 9.5010.19E-06 0.80 Agreement | |||
6 Co 6.5010.88E-06 8.4910.17E-06 0.76 Agreement | |||
1/ NRC results were taken from the st.andard certification supplied to the | |||
Region IV office as prepared by RESL and traceable to the National | |||
Bureau of Standards. | |||
2/ Analytical results were not available from the licensee's contractor | |||
at the time of the report. | |||
. | |||
_ - .. -_ _ . . _ _ . . . . | |||
; | |||
. ., | |||
ATTACHMENT 3 | |||
I " Standup" Whole Body Counting System Confirmatory' Measurements | |||
! | |||
4 | |||
1. Positioning Verification Test | |||
NRC Whole Body Phantom With 5 Percent Lung Burden Standard | |||
Tests (1), (2), and'(3) . | |||
~ | |||
i | |||
RBS Result' RBS' Result RBS Result -Standard | |||
j Nuclide Test (1) Test (2) Test (3) Average Deviation | |||
! 60Co 0.636 0.629 '0.627 0.631 0.005 | |||
i | |||
2. Analytical Measurements- | |||
a. -Lung Test | |||
NRC Whole Body Phantom With Various Lung Organ Burden Activities of | |||
, | |||
Cobalt-60 | |||
' | |||
RBS Results NRC Results* RBS/NRC- | |||
Test No. % MP0B (uCi) (uCi) Ratio | |||
4 5% 0.568 0.500 1.14 | |||
5 10% 1.204 1.000 1.20 | |||
6 50% 4.780 5.000 0.96 | |||
j 7 100% 8.972 10.000; 0.90 | |||
8 200% 15.016 20.000 0.75 | |||
b. Thyroid Test | |||
NRC Whole Body Phantom With Various Thyroid Organ Burden Activities of | |||
Barium-133 as Mock Iodine-131 | |||
RBS Results NRC Results* RBS/NRC | |||
- | |||
Test No. % MP08 (uCi) (uCi) Ratio | |||
' | |||
9 5% 0.022 0.036 0.61 | |||
10 10% 6.042 0.070 0.60 | |||
11 50% 0.210 0.350 0.60 | |||
: 12 100% 0.354 0.700 0.50 | |||
1 13. 200% 0.760 1.400 0.54 | |||
1 | |||
! | |||
: | |||
l | |||
t | |||
_ . . _._ . . . _ . _ . __ ._. - _ __ _ . . _ | |||
. . | |||
2 | |||
c. Lung and Thyroid Scan | |||
NRC Whole Body Phantom With Various Combinations of Lung and Thyroid | |||
Organ Burden Activities of Cobalt-60 in the Lungs and Barium-133 | |||
as Mock Iodine-131 in the Thyroid | |||
RBS Results NRC Results* RBS/NRC | |||
Test No. Nuclide % MP08 (uCi) -(uCi) Ratio | |||
14 133Ba 200% 0.763 1.400 0.'55 | |||
GoCO 10% 1.116 1.000 1.12 | |||
15 133Ba 100% 0.375 0.700 0.54 | |||
60C0 10% 1.130 1.000 1.13 | |||
16 133Ba 100% 0.370 0.700 0.53 | |||
60Co 5% 0.564 -0.500 1.13 | |||
17 133Ba 5% 0.031 0.036 0.86 | |||
SOCo 5% 0.588 0.500 1.18 | |||
18 133Ba 200% 0.629 1.400 0.45 | |||
60Co 200% 14.806 20.000 0.74 | |||
* | |||
NRC values were taken from the standard certificates supplied | |||
with the standat-ds as prepared by a commercial vendor and | |||
verified by the NRC's laboratory, RESL, in Idaho Falls, Idaho, | |||
s | |||
. | |||
. | |||
# | |||
^ | |||
f | |||
, | |||
ATTACitMEtiT B ", | |||
* | |||
OPEN ACTI0fl ITEMS LIST | |||
Date: c/n /r; Type Code: A= Allegation M= Miscellaneous | |||
B= Bulletin 0=0 pen Item | |||
Docket flo: so ver C= Circular R=Part 21 Report | |||
(8) D= Deviation T= Temporary Instructions | |||
E=50.55(e) U= Unresolved Item | |||
L=LER V= Violation | |||
floto - Max characters allowed for each entry shown in (1) | |||
1 2 3- 4 5 6 7 8 | |||
Type I tera Report . | |||
Responsible Update /Closecut Status | |||
Item flo. Paragraph Section Module Description Report Code | |||
(1) (8) (6) (4) (7) (186) (30) (1) | |||
Y f?or-oi & -r K r 14725~ X. .'/~ <a. k T.a -..J Ca1:b'<wI. % | |||
of A Crs Cho hy,y L | |||
. | |||
** | |||
I | |||
. | |||
. . _ _ . . _ _ . . . - - ._ ..._ ._ _ . _ ___..__ _ _._. _._ _ __ _ , _ . _.-. . . - . _ . , . _ . . | |||
. . . _ _ , _ . . . _ ._ .- _.. . . = . _ , . . | |||
.. . .. | |||
, | |||
; | |||
' Pt gs:' -?- ) | |||
Updatsd: mbar 5,1985 f[ffff | |||
R3 port Resp. . . | |||
Update /Close . | |||
' Jyp3 I tts No. Pa rac ra ph. Sect. Module .ebcriptien Ettpo rt gbg . . . | |||
0- 8414-004 6.8 T-RP GASEOUS RADWASTE SYSTEM 0 . | |||
T-RP EFFLUENT RELEASE PROCEDURES 0 | |||
0 8414-005 7 | |||
8414-006 8 T-RP SOLID RADWASTE SYSTEM 0 | |||
0 | |||
T-RP RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS 0 | |||
0 8414-007 9 | |||
PROCESS AND EFFLUENT MONITORS | |||
T-RP AIR CLEANING FILTER SYSTEMS 0 1 | |||
0- 841'4-008 10 | |||
0 8422-0'5 8 T-RP 84525 POSTACCIDENT SAMPLING SYSTEM ( 85-17 )( 85-47 ) ($.or) .A'C- | |||
O' 8422-006 9 T-RP. 84525 FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, & SUPPLIES ( 85-17 )( 85-47 )(g4.os) D d- | |||
T-RP ~ NUREG-0737, ITEM lil.A.2 0 | |||
0 8505-001 13 | |||
i | |||
i | |||
. | |||
I | |||
! | |||
! | |||
l | |||
, | |||
i | |||
,,m,. . + - | |||
..- | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 14:42, 18 December 2020
ML20140E914 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | River Bend |
Issue date: | 03/06/1986 |
From: | Murray B, Nicholas J, Wise R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20140E887 | List: |
References | |
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-2.B.3, TASK-TM 50-458-86-05, 50-458-86-5, NUDOCS 8603280233 | |
Download: ML20140E914 (18) | |
See also: IR 05000458/1986005
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.
. . APPENDIX B U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV NRC Inspection Report: 50-458/86-05 License: NPF-47 Docket: 50-458 Licensee: Gulf States Utilities (GSU) P. O. Box 2951 Beaumont, Texas 77704 Facility Name: River Bend Station (RBS) Inspection At: River Bend Station, St. Francisville, Louisiana Inspection Conducted: January 27-31, 1986 Inspectors: /IAk. /Ait2// J. Blair Nicholas, Radiation Specialist, Dtte & Facilities Radiological Protection Sect on 0fdin19Mbvuxb/ R'ussell Wise, 'Radiatiori Specialist, Facilit !es 5 6/B6 0' ate' d. Radiological Protection Section Approved: OfqJMlA{[/// M/[[ BlaineMurray,~ Chief,facilitiesRadiological D' ate Protection Section Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted January 27-31, 1986 (Report 50-458/86-05') Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection of the licensee's water chemistry and radiochemistry programs including: review of organization and management control, staffing and staff qualifications, training program, facilities and equipment, NUREG-0737, Item II.B.3, postaccident sampling system (PASS), quality assurance (QA) program of chemistry / radiochemistry activities, quality control of analytical measurements, radiochemistry and whole body counting system confirmatory measurements. The inspection involved 78 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspectors. Results: Within the areas inspected, one violation was identified (see paragraph 6). Two previously identified open items were closed. P %h O
, - .. . . 2 DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted GSU *W. J. Cahill, Senior Vice President , RBS Nuclear Group *J. C. Deddens, Vice President, RBS Nuclear Group- *T. F. Plunkett, Plant Manager *T. D. Burnett, Plant Chemist' *S. V. Desai, Chemical Engineer ~*J. W. Evans, Stenographer *K. J. Giadrosich, Operations - QA *D. P.. Gipson, Assistant Plant Manager - Operations *R. E. Horn, Nuclear Training Representative *R. J. King, Lkensing Engineer *W. J. Lambert, Systems Engineer *G. D. Lipham, Chemistry Foreman A. _S. Maryman, Nuclear Chemistry Technician R. L. McCann, Nuclear Chemistry Tectnician *J. H. McQuirter, Licensing Engineer *C. .L. Nash, Chemistry Supervisor
, D. M. Ross, Radiological Health Specialist
R. J. Shah, QA Engineer *J.- E. Somerindyke, Corporate Security J. E. Spivey,-QA Engineer *P. F. Tomlinson, Director, Quality Services W. K. Woodcox, Chemistry Foreman Others *D. D. Chamberlain, NRC Senior Resident Inspector W. B. Jones, NRC Resident Inspector- * Denotes those present-during the exit briefing on January.3.1, 1986. The NRC inspectors also interviewed several'other RBS employees during the inspection. 2. , Licensee ~ Action on Previous-Inspection Findings
.
(Closed) Open Item (458/8422-05): Postaccident Sampling System _- This item involved the lack of. PASS operation verification by collecting reactor water and contair. ment atmosphere samples, performing required analyses, and completing training of nuclear chemistry technicians.on PASS. The NRC j senior resident inspector witnessed a demonstration of the licensee's : ability to provide representative reactor water samples using the manual grab PASS on November 10, 1985. The NRC inspector during this inspection- .l also witnessed a similar demonstration and verified that the' licensee's PASS and associated procedures satisfy the requirements of NUREG-C737, Item II.B.3. The licensee had completed technician training on.the PASS ' -. , -
. . 3
,
for 10 nuclear chemistry technicians. The li'censee's methods, analytical sensitivities, and analytical results of chemistry parameters are consistent with PASS requirements. This item is considered closed. (Closed) Open Item (458/8422-06): Facilities, Equipment, and Supplies --
!
This item involved the completion of construction, testing, calibration'of
'
process instrumentation, and the routine.~use of the' chemistry sample panels and-associated process instrumentation. The NRC inspectors inspected the - various chemistry sampling areas including the reactor water sample panel, turbine. plant sample panel, condensate demineralizer sample panel, makeup water sample panel, radwaste sample panel, and fuel building. sample panel. The NRC inspectors determined that all the sampling panels had been tested and calibrations had been performed on associated process instrumentation in accordance with RBS procedures and that all sampling areas were in
j reutine operation. This item is considered closed. 4 3. Inspector Observations
The following are observations the NRC inspectors discussed with the licensee during the inspection and at the exit' interview on January 31, 1986. These observations are neither violations nor unresolved items. These items were recommcnded for licensee consideration for program improvement, but they have no' specific regulatory requirement. The licensee stated the items would be reviewed. o Confirmatory Measurements - The percent agreement between the licensee and NRC were below the expected values for these kinds of measurements (see paragraph 12.b). 4. Chemistry / Radiochemistry Organization and Managemer.t Controls The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's organization and staffing of the chemistry / radiochemistry section (C/RS) to determine compliance with commitments in Chapter 13 of the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and the requirements in Section 6.2.of the Technical Specifications (TS) and in RBS procedures. The NRC inspectors verified that the organizational structure of the C/RS was as defined in the FSAR, TS, and RBS procedures. The NRC inspectors reviewed the RBS management control procedures and position descriptions for the assignment of. responsibilities for the management and implementa- tion of the RBS. chemistry / radiochemistry program. The NRC inspectors verified that the administrative control responsibilities specified by the RBS procedures were being implemented. '
'
The NRC inspectors reviewed the staffing of the_C/RS and noted that since the previous NRC chemistry / radiochemistry inspection in June 1985, the C/RS had lost its lead chemist and~one' chemistry foreman. The chemistry foreman position had been filled by one of the plant chemists and the vacated' plant chemist position had been filled by one of the senior nuclear chemistry l , __. _ . , . _ . - _
. . _ - . . 4 technicians leaving 15 nuclear chemistry technician positions filled and one vacancy. At the time of the inspection, the lead chemist position was temporarily filled with a qualified contractor. The chemistry supervisor was recruiting to fill the staff vacancies. No violations or deviations were identified. 5. Chemistry / Radiochemistry' Personnel Qualifications The NRC inspectors reviewed the qualifications of the C/RS personnel to determine compliance with commitments in Chapter 13 of the FSAR and the requirements in Section 6.3 of the TS and in RBS procedures. The NRC inspectors reviewed the resumes of each of .he C/RS personnel and verified that they met the required qualifications specified in the FSAR, TS, RBS procedures, and position descriptions. The NRC inspectors determined that the licensee had an' adequate staff to meet shift staffing
. requirements.
No violations or deviations were identified. 6. Chemistry / Radiochemistry Training Program The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's chemistry / radiochemistry training program to determine complianca with commitments in Chapter 13.2 of the FSAR and the requirements in Section 6.4 of the TS, 10 CFR Part 19.12, and in RBS procedures. The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's program for training and qualification of RBS C/RS personnel as described in the nuclear training department procedures and in RBS Chemistry Section Procedure. The.NRC inspectors reviewed the C/RS individual staff training matrix records and determined that nine chemistry technicians had completed all matrix training requirements and six chemistry technicians were in the process of completing the general RBS systems training and PASS hands-on analysis training. No violations or deviations were identified. 7. Chemistry / Radiochemistry Program The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's chemistry / radiochemistry program to determine compliance with commitments in Chapters 5, 9, and 11 of the FSAR and the requirements in Section 3/4.4.4 of the TS.and in C/RS procedures. The NRC inspectors' review of the chemistry / radiochemistry program found that the licensee nad completed and approved all identified administrative procedures, surveillance procedures, chemical control procedures, instrument
t i
,_.
. . 5 calibration and performance check procedures, sampling procedures, and analytical procedures. A review of selected procedures, logs, and analyt- ical data indicated that the C/RS had established sufficient administrative a1d analytical procedures to meet the requirements of the FSAR and TS. The NRC inspectors reviewed the calibration and qua'ity control program for the secondary chemistry laboratory instruments and primary chemistry laboratory instruments. Laboratory instrument calibration and performance check data and other documentation of instrument performance were reviewed. During the review of instrument calibration data, it was noted that the licensee'had not documented any calibrations performeo on the Fisher Model 1200 gas chromatograph when performing hydrogen analysis of the offgas hydrogen recombiner effluent. The rnalysis. procedure COP-0425, " Determination of H2and 0 Gas 2 Concentration - Gas Chromatography Method," Revision 1, July 25, 1985, requires in paragraph 8.3 that calibration standard data be recorded on the appropriate chemistry log. The fraquency of calibration .'or the gas chromatograph, prior to each use, and appropriate chemistry log, 50ul.1.7.4, are specified in CSP-121, "Chcmistry Laboratory Instrument Surveillance," Revision 1, December-22, 1985. The NRC inspectors determined on January 29, 1986, that the gas chromatograph had been used to perform 57 hydrogen analyses of the offgas hydrogen recombiner effluent, while the offgas explosive gas monitoring system was inoperable, during the period January 14-26, 1986. A review of the TS surveillance report form for procedure N P-0100, " Chemical / Radiochemical Technical Specifications Surveillances," Revision 1, December 20, 1985, completed during the above specified period showed that the offgas hydrogen recombiner effluent had been sampled and analyzed every 4 hours for hydrogen concentration .to satisfy Technical Specification Table 3.3.7.11-1, Action 123, without the required gas chromatograph calibration data being documented. Technical Specification 6.10.2.d requires that records be retained for at least 5 years of surveillance activities, inspections, and calibrations required by the TS. The licensee's failure to maintain calibration records of the gas chromatograph while performing a TS required surveillance is considered an apparent violation of TS 6.10.2.d. (458/8605-01). 8. Facilities and-Equipment The NRC inspectors inspected the facilities and equipment / supplies used by the C/RS staff. The following facilities were inspected: cold laboratory, radiochemistry laboratory, radiochemistry counting room, various chemistry sampling panels, and PASS sample preparation area. The licensee had completed construction in all the areas inspected. The laboratories were equipped with the necessary chemicals, reagents, standards, labware, and analytical instrumentation to perform the required analytical procedures. The installation of the. various chemistry sampling panels was completed and the associated process instrumentation had been tested and' calibrated and was routinely operational. The PASS sample preparation area adjacent to the radiochemistry laboratory was equipped ano functional. No violations or deviations were identified.
I o
-. - -. . .. . 6 , '9. Postaccident.Samplina System The NRC . inspectors reviewed the licensee's PASS to determine compliance with the requirements of NUREG-0737, Item II.B.3, and Section 6.8.4.c of the TS.
,
' The NRC inspectors inspected the area.in the plant where the PASS hardware had been installed. The NRC inspectors verified _that the equipment and associated procedures satisfied the requirements of NUREG-0737, Item II.B.3, and the TS for representative sampling and analysis of reactor water and containment atmosphere follcwing a reactor incident. The licensee had completed PASS operator training for 10 C/RS technicians as part of their shift qualification. Five remaining C/RS technicians'will receive PASS operator training as soon as current PASS operating procedure revisions are approved. The NRC inspectors witnessed the initial monthly chemistry surveillance of PASS in accordance with Chemistry Section Procedure, CSP-0150, " Chemistry Surveillance of the Post-Accident Sampling System (PASS)," Revision 1, January 2, 1986. The licensee demonstrated PASS operability by collecting a simulated sample of reactor water using demineralized flush water due to the status of the plant at 10 percent power and plant operations having many systems isolated to assist in diagnosing plant operating problems.. The licensee also collected a sample from the containment building. The licensee prepared these samples for.the required analyses in accordance with approved procedures. -However, due to the nature of these samples, analyses were not performed during this inspection. As discussed in NRC Inspection Report 50-458/85-77, the PASS had been demonstrated operable on November 10, 1985, by the taking of two liquid samples from the jet pump header.
, i The licensee analyzed the first sample for pH, dissolved oxygen, dissolved
- hydrogen, boron, conductivity, and radionuclides'within 3 hours from the
i time the decision was made to take the samples as required by NUREG-0737. i
The NRC inspectors determined that the licensee's procedures, analytical sensitivities, and analytical results of chemi_stry parameters were
! consistent with PASS requirements.
No violations or deviations were identified.
L
10. Quality Assurance Program The NRC inspectors revi sed the licensee's QA audit / surveillance program regarding chemistry /radicciemistry activities to determine compliance with commitments in Chapter 17 of the FSAR and the requirements in Section 6.5.3.8 of the-TS and related RBS QA procedures. The NRC inspectors reviewed the QA department organization, selected QA audit and surveillance procedures, audit schedule for 1986, QA audits
l qualifications, and audit and surveillance reports. The licensee completed
an audit of the chemistry / radiochemistry program on June 6,1985, which was- reviewed in NRC Inspection Report (458/85-47). The NRC inspectors noted
l _ ._- - _ . . . . _ _ _ _
. .
7 that the next chemistry / radiochemistry program audit is scheduled for May 1986. . Reports generated from surveillances performed during 1985 in the areas of chemistry / radiochemistry TS surveillance requirements were reviewed for scope to ensure thoroughness of program evaluation. The NRC _ inspectors found the QA surveillance program adequate and responses and corrective actions to surveillance findings timely. No violations'or deviations were identified. 11. Quality Control of Radiological Analytical Measurements The NRC inspectors inspected the radiochemistry counting room and reviewed the licensee's program for calibration and quality control of radiological analytical measurements to determine compliance with the requirements in Sections 6.8 and 6.10 of the TS. The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's records, for the period July through December 1985, involving instrument surveillance procedures', instrument calibration and quality control procedures, counting instrument calibration and performance check data, and other documentation of instrument ~ performance. No violations or deviations were identified. 12. Analytical Measurements a. Confirmatory Measurements Confirmatory measurements were performed on the following standards and samples in the NRC Region IV mobile laboratory at'RBS during the inspection: (1) NRC Face Loaded Scott Charcoal Cartridge Standard (SRS-17817-109) (2) NRC Particulate Filter Standard (SRS-17818-109) (3) Simulated Liquid Radwaste (1 Liter Marinelli Beaker) (4) Reactor Coolant System Liquid (1 Liter Poly Bottle) (5) Reactor Coolant System Tritium Sample The confirmatory measurements test consisted of comparing measurements made by the licensee and the N'lC mobile laboratory. The NRC's mobile laboratory measurements are referenced to the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) by laboratory intercomparisons. Confirmatory measure- ments are made only for those nuclides identified by the NRC as being present in concentrations greater than 10 percent of the respective isotopic values for' liquid and gas concentrations as stated in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II. Attachment I contains the criteria used to compare results.
. .
8 b. Results The licensee maintains four germanium-lithium ~ detectors in the radiochemistry counting room. At the time of the inspection, two of .the detectors were out-of-service due to electronic malfunctions. All four detectors.are used for routine isotopic analysis of radioactive samples to demonstrate compliance with TS and regulatory requirements. The analytical results from the two detectors were compared with the NRC results, as well as with each other. The licensee performed the tritium analysis on their liquid scintillation counting system. The individual sample analyses and comparison of analytical results of the confirmatory measurements are tabulated in Attachment 2. The licensee's gamma isotopic results from the listed samples in Attachment 2 showed 82 percent agreement with the NRC analysis results based on 61 agreement results out of 74.nuclides identified and compared. The 82 percent agreement results between the licensee and NRC are below the value that would be expected for an effective radio- chemistry program. The normally expected agreement would be greater than 90 percent. The comparative measurements'results were discussed with the licensee during the exit interview on January 31, 1986. The licensee stated that their radiochemistry program.would be reviewed in an attempt to improve their measurement capabilities. The licensee's tritium result on the reactor coolant system sample was in agreement with the NRC analysis result. Confirmatory measurements were performed by the licensee on a liquid unknown samp?e prepared by the Radiological Environmental Sciences Laboratory (RESL) in Idaho Falls, Idaho using known nuclide concen- trations of 893p, 903p, 3g, 137Cs, and 50Co. The licensee's analytical results were compared to the known sample activities and the results of the comparisons are presented in Attachment 2, sample 6. The licensee's results were in 100 percent agreement with the certified activities for 3H, 187Cs, and 60Co in the sample. The analytical results for 895r and 90Sr were not available from the licensee's contractor laboratory at the time of the inspection. No violations or deviations were identified. 13. Whole Body Counting System The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's " standup" whole body counting system (WBCS) to determine compliance with 10 CFR Part 20.103. The licensee maintains a shadow shield bed type WBCS also. The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's program for operation,. calibration, and quality control of the " standup" WBCS and found it adequate. The licensee had calibrated the " standup" WBCS using sources of common nuclides found in nuclear power facilities which represented vari.ous percentages of maximum permissible organ burdens. The licensee's sources were traceable to the NBS and were.used in a masonite phantom supplied by the vendor-of the WBCS. ,
. . 9 , The NRC inspectors supplied the licensee with a whole body counting phantom to perform confirmatory measurements in.' the " standup" WBCS. The phantom and counting arrangements were described in NRC Inspection Report 50-458/85-17. The phantom was-stood. upright on a support in the WBCS during the measurements. The results of the body positioning ~ test and the. comparison of the analytical results of the confirmatory measurecents- against the standard activities are tabulated in Attachment 3. The licensee analyzed the nuclide~ activities riositioned in the NRC phantom
a to simulate inhalation as " mock f odine"~ in the thyroid and soCo in the
lungs. The NRC inspectors checked the licensee's accuracy of body positioning in the " standup" WBCS and found the reproducibility of measurements satisfactory. The results of the body burden activity measurements taken resulted in several observations regarding the " standup" WBCS. These observations include the following: ~ a. The licensee's results for 5 percent through two organ burdens of
,
6oCo in 'the right lung ranged from 14 percent higher to 25 percent lower than the certified activities of the NRC standards with increasing organ burdens. (See Tests (4)-(8)). These results are more accurate than the results of similar previous tests performed on the licensee's shadow shield style WBCS. (See NRC Inspection Report 50-458/85-17). b. The licensee's results~for 5 percent through two organ burdens of 133Ba as " mock iodine" in the thyroid were nonconservative and were approximately 40 percent low 3r than the certified activities of the NRC standards. (See Tests (9)-(13)). These results are more consistent and overall more accurate than the results of similar previous tests performed on the licensee's shadow shield style WBCS which showed results ranging from 40 percent lower to 300 percent higher than the certified activities over the same organ
! -burden range. (See NRC Inspection Report 50-458/85-17).
c. The licensee was able to analyze most accurately a 5 percent organ burden of 233Ba as " mock iodine" in the thyroid in the presence of a 5 percent organ t,urden of 80Co in the lungs. (See Test (17)). The other combinations of activity concentrations tested of " mock iodine" ' in the thyroid and 80Co in lungs gave results indicating the thyro'<i
,
. activity approximately 50 percent lower than the certified activi
'
values. (See Tests (14), (15), (16), and (18)). The licensee was informed of the analytical results of the confirmatory measurements. . No violations or deviations were identified. 14. . Exit Briefina The NRC inspectors met with the NRC senior resident inspector and the licensee representatives identified in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the-
- inspection on January 31, 1986. The lead NRC inspector summarized the
'
scope of the inspection, discussed the inspection findings,.and presented the results of the confirmatory measurements. , , - - ,. , -- ~v - r w, ,
_ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
. .
ATTACHMENT 1. Criteria ^for Comparing Analytical Measurements The following are the criteria used in comparing the results of capability tests and verification measurements. The criteria are based on an empirical relationship established through prior experience and this program's-analytical requirements. In these criteria, the' judgement limits vary in. relation to the comparison of the resolution. NRC VALUE Resolution = NRC UNCERTAINTY Ratio = LICENSEE VALUE NRC VALUE Comparisons are made by.first determining the resolution ~and then reading across the same line to the corresponding ratio. The following table shows the acceptance' values. RESOLUTION AGREEMENT RATIO <4- 0.4 - 2.5 4-7 0.5 - 2.0 8 - 15 0.6 - 1.66 16 -50 0.75 - 1.33 51 - 200 0.80 - 1.25 >200 0.85 - 1.18 The above criteria are applied to the following analyses: (1) Gamma Spectrometry. (2) Tritium analyses of liquid samples. (3) Iodine on adsorbers. (4) 895r and 995r determinations. (5) Gross Beta where samples are counted on the same date using the same' reference nuclide.
. __ . _ _ , . . _._ f . . -ATTACHMENT 2
Confirmatory Measurements:Results
<
. 1. NRC Face Lo'ded a Scott Charcoal Cartridge Standard (SRS-17817-109)
(Standardized 11:00 CST, July 1,1985) RBS RBS Results- NRC-Results. RBS/NRC. Comparison
- Nuclide Det. -(uCi/ sample) (uCi/ sample) Ratio Decision
!
'
57Co- (1) =1.8210.08E-02 1.8910.01E-02 0.96' Agreement (2) 2.0110.09E-02 '1.06 Agreement 60Co #1) 4.74 0.16E-02 4.8710.02E-02 0.97 Agreement ; (2) ~5.02 0.17E-02 1.03 Agreement asY (1) 1.0810.04E-01 1.1410.01E-01 0.95 Agreement
j (2) 1.1510.05E-01 1.01 ' Agreement
109Cd- (1) 1.1710.09E+00 1.1910.003E+0 0.98 Ngreement'
7 (2) 1.2610.10E+00 1.06 . Agreement ! , 11aSn (1) 6.8210.39E-02 7.3810.04E-02 0.92 Agreement 1 (2) 7.5810.43E-02 1.03 Agreement
'137Cs (1) 4.4010.24E-02 4.4410.02E-02 0.99 Agreement (2) 4.8210.27E-02 1.09 Agreement 139Ce (1). 3.1210.21E-02 3.5310.02E-02 0.88 Agreement '
,
(2) 3.4710.23E-02 0.98 Agreement zosHg (1) 6.9510.59E-02 7.2110.11E-02 0.96 Agreement (2) 7.6110.64E-02 . 1.05 Agreement
l 2. .NRC Particulate Filter Standard (SRS-17818-109)
- (Standardized 11
- 00 CST, July 1, -1985)
i
RBS RBS Results NRC Results RBS/NRC Comparison
j- Nuclide Det. (uCi/ sample) (uCi/ sample) . Ratio Decision !
57Co (1) 3.8010.08E-02 1.9510.01E-02 0.92 Agreement (2) 1.6210.07E-02 0.83 Agreement 80Co (1) 4.'6810.16E-02 4.6410.02E-02 1. 01' ' Agreement
- (2) 4.5210.16E-02 0.97 Agreement
asY (1) 1. 0810. 04E-01 1.0710.01E-01' 1~. 01 Agreement .(2) 1.0410.04E-01 0.98 Agreement
- 109Cd (1) 1.1210.09E+00 1.32 0.003E+0 0.85 Agreement
(2) 1.0310.08E+00 0.78 Disagreement 113Sn (1) 7.0210.40E-02 6.8810.04E-02- 1.02 Agreement.
j .(2) 6.4810.37E-02 0.94 Agreement
1
. - . .._. .- , - , , , , . . , . - - - - . , _ , - -- - , ,.n - . - -. . - - .-- .
. . 2 137Cs (1) 4.4310.24E-02 4.1110.02E-02 1.08 Agreement (2) 4.19 0.23E-02 1.02 Agreement 139Ce (1) 3.0510.20E-02 3.34 0.01E-02 0.91 Agreement (2) 2.81 0.19E-02 0.84 Disagreement 203Hg (1) 6.6110.56E-02 5.9510.08E-02 1.11 Agreement (2) 6.0210.52E-02 1.01 Agreement 3. Simulated Liquid Radwaste (1 Liter Marinelli Beaker) (Sampled 14:30 CST, January 28,.1986) RBS RBS Results NRC Results RBS/NRC Comparison Nuclide Det. (uCi/ml) (uCi/ml) Ratio Decision 24Na (1) 4.74 0.24E-05 4.4810.05E-05 1.06 Agreement (2) 4.63 0.23E-05 1.03 Agreement 51Cr (1). 1.4310.28E-05 1.5310.27E-05 0.94 Agreement (2)- 1.9310.34E-05 1.27 Agreement 54Mn (1) 7.2610.42E-06 7.1810.22E-06 1.01 Agreement (2) 7.03i0.43E-06 0.98 Agreement
'
56Mn (1) 1.4010.06E.04 1.2510.03E-04 1.13 Agreement (2) 1.3510.06E-04 1.09 Agreement ssCo (1) 2.5410.22E-06 3.7810.19E-06 - No Comparison 1/ (2) 2.3810.23E-06 - No Comparison I/ 64Cu (1) 2.6910.15E-03 2.7710.06E-03 0.97 Agreement (2) 2.65 0.15E-03 0.96 Agreement 97Nb (1) Not Identified 2/ 2.01 0.02E-04 - Disagreement (2) NotIdentified]/ Disagreement 99"Tc (1) Not Identif ed 2/ 2.1510.04E-05 - Disagreement (2) NotIdentified2/ - Disagreement 99Mo (1) 1.3710.08E-05 8.20il.01E-06 1.67 Disagreement (2) 1.48i0.09E-05 1.80 Disagreement 122Sb (1) 9.8110.71E-06 7.3310.21E-06 1.34 ,Disaoreement (2) 8.5310.68E-06 1.16 Agreement , 132I (1) 3.0810.13E-05 2.7610.07E-05 1.12 Agreement (2) 2.8310.18E-05 1.03 Agreement 133I (1)- Not Identified 3/ 2.9310.20E-06 - Disagreement (2) 1.9310.26E-07 0.07 Disagreement 1851 (1) 1.9710.75E-06 2.0910.76E-06 0.94 Agreement (2) 2.6010.77E-06 1.24 Agreement
. - - . .= . - - -. . - . . 3 187W (1) 2.9010.62E-06 2.0610.87E-06 - No Comparison 1/ (2) 3.39 0.59E-06 - No Comparison 1/
j
]/ Nuclide concentration' determined by the NRC was less than 10 percent of the isotopic value stated in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table-II; therefore, no comparison was made. ~ l '2/ Nuclide was not identified by the . licensee because it was not included in the isotope library used for the analysis.
4
3/ Isotopic peak was present 'n the: spectral data;-however, the licensee's peak confidence level for peak identification had been established so as not to allow analysis.of nuclides at sensitivity levels equal to 10 l percent of the isotopic values stated in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, ,
t Table II, Column 2.
4. Reactor Coolant System Liquid (1 Liter Poly Bottle) (Sampled 16:30 CST, January 28, 1986) RBS RBS Results NRC Results RBS/NRC Comparison Nuclide Det. (uCi/ml) -(uCi/ml) - Ratio Decision 24Na (1) 1.8010.10E-04 1.6710.03E-04 1.08 Agreement (2) 1.7610.10E-04 1.05- Agreement 51Cr (1) 7.4711.68E-05 5.8210.78E-05 1.28 Agreement < -(2) 8.84 1.57E-05 1.52 Agreement s4Mn (1) 2.2710.18E-05 1.8610.06E-05 1.22 Agreement (2) 2.1410.17E-05 -1.16 Agreement 56M7 (1) 3.3910.56E-04 3.1310.41E-04 1.08 Agreement (2) 3.6010.60E-04 1.15 Agreement 58C0 (1) 9.28tl.13E-06 9.2610.50E-06 1.00 Agreement (2) 1.1510.12E-05 1.25' Agreement 64Cu (1) 1.0610.08E-02 8.4910.32E-03 1.25 Agreement (2) 1.0610.09E-02 1. 2r Agreement 89Mo (1) 4.2010.29E-05 3.1210.34E-05 1.35 Agreement (2) 3.7410.26E-05 1.20 Agreement 1225b (1) 5.0510.39E-05 2.0410.07E-05 2.48 Disagreement' (2) 3.6310.31E-05 1.78- Disagreement 4 187W (1) 1.7610.44E-05 9.5812.04E-06 1.83 Agreement (2) 1.5910.71E-05 1.66 Agreement i e F* * l . * <
. . 4 5. Reactor Coolant System Tritium Sample (Sampled 14:00 CST, January 27, 1986) RBS Result N.'tC Result RBS/NRC Comparison Nuclide (uCi/ml) (uCi/ml) Ratio Decision 3H 8.5610.31E-05 11.1010.59E-05 0.77 Agreement 6. RESL Unknown Liquid Sample (Standardized 12:00 MST, January 11, 1985) RBS Results NRC Results RBS/NRC. Comparison Nuclide- (uCi/ml) (uCi/ml) Ratio Decision 3H 4.9610.49E-05 4.5610.09E-05 1.08 Agreement 88Sr 2/ - No. Comparison 8 Sr 2/ - No Comparison 137Cs 7.62il.03E-06 9.5010.19E-06 0.80 Agreement 6 Co 6.5010.88E-06 8.4910.17E-06 0.76 Agreement 1/ NRC results were taken from the st.andard certification supplied to the Region IV office as prepared by RESL and traceable to the National Bureau of Standards. 2/ Analytical results were not available from the licensee's contractor at the time of the report.
.
_ - .. -_ _ . . _ _ . . . .
. ., ATTACHMENT 3
I " Standup" Whole Body Counting System Confirmatory' Measurements ! 4
1. Positioning Verification Test NRC Whole Body Phantom With 5 Percent Lung Burden Standard Tests (1), (2), and'(3) . ~
i
RBS Result' RBS' Result RBS Result -Standard
j Nuclide Test (1) Test (2) Test (3) Average Deviation ! 60Co 0.636 0.629 '0.627 0.631 0.005 i
2. Analytical Measurements- a. -Lung Test NRC Whole Body Phantom With Various Lung Organ Burden Activities of
,
Cobalt-60 ' RBS Results NRC Results* RBS/NRC- Test No. % MP0B (uCi) (uCi) Ratio 4 5% 0.568 0.500 1.14 5 10% 1.204 1.000 1.20 6 50% 4.780 5.000 0.96
j 7 100% 8.972 10.000; 0.90
8 200% 15.016 20.000 0.75 b. Thyroid Test NRC Whole Body Phantom With Various Thyroid Organ Burden Activities of Barium-133 as Mock Iodine-131 RBS Results NRC Results* RBS/NRC
-
Test No. % MP08 (uCi) (uCi) Ratio
'
9 5% 0.022 0.036 0.61 10 10% 6.042 0.070 0.60 11 50% 0.210 0.350 0.60
- 12 100% 0.354 0.700 0.50
1 13. 200% 0.760 1.400 0.54 1 !
l t
_ . . _._ . . . _ . _ . __ ._. - _ __ _ . . _
. .
2 c. Lung and Thyroid Scan NRC Whole Body Phantom With Various Combinations of Lung and Thyroid Organ Burden Activities of Cobalt-60 in the Lungs and Barium-133 as Mock Iodine-131 in the Thyroid RBS Results NRC Results* RBS/NRC Test No. Nuclide % MP08 (uCi) -(uCi) Ratio 14 133Ba 200% 0.763 1.400 0.'55 GoCO 10% 1.116 1.000 1.12 15 133Ba 100% 0.375 0.700 0.54 60C0 10% 1.130 1.000 1.13 16 133Ba 100% 0.370 0.700 0.53 60Co 5% 0.564 -0.500 1.13 17 133Ba 5% 0.031 0.036 0.86 SOCo 5% 0.588 0.500 1.18 18 133Ba 200% 0.629 1.400 0.45 60Co 200% 14.806 20.000 0.74 * NRC values were taken from the standard certificates supplied with the standat-ds as prepared by a commercial vendor and verified by the NRC's laboratory, RESL, in Idaho Falls, Idaho, s . . #
^
f
, ATTACitMEtiT B ", * OPEN ACTI0fl ITEMS LIST Date: c/n /r; Type Code: A= Allegation M= Miscellaneous B= Bulletin 0=0 pen Item Docket flo: so ver C= Circular R=Part 21 Report (8) D= Deviation T= Temporary Instructions E=50.55(e) U= Unresolved Item L=LER V= Violation floto - Max characters allowed for each entry shown in (1) 1 2 3- 4 5 6 7 8 Type I tera Report . Responsible Update /Closecut Status Item flo. Paragraph Section Module Description Report Code (1) (8) (6) (4) (7) (186) (30) (1) Y f?or-oi & -r K r 14725~ X. .'/~ <a. k T.a -..J Ca1:b'<wI. % of A Crs Cho hy,y L . **
I
.
. . _ _ . . _ _ . . . - - ._ ..._ ._ _ . _ ___..__ _ _._. _._ _ __ _ , _ . _.-. . . - . _ . , . _ . . . . . _ _ , _ . . . _ ._ .- _.. . . = . _ , . . .. . .. , ; ' Pt gs:' -?- ) Updatsd: mbar 5,1985 f[ffff R3 port Resp. . . Update /Close . ' Jyp3 I tts No. Pa rac ra ph. Sect. Module .ebcriptien Ettpo rt gbg . . . 0- 8414-004 6.8 T-RP GASEOUS RADWASTE SYSTEM 0 . T-RP EFFLUENT RELEASE PROCEDURES 0 0 8414-005 7 8414-006 8 T-RP SOLID RADWASTE SYSTEM 0 0 T-RP RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS 0 0 8414-007 9 PROCESS AND EFFLUENT MONITORS T-RP AIR CLEANING FILTER SYSTEMS 0 1 0- 841'4-008 10 0 8422-0'5 8 T-RP 84525 POSTACCIDENT SAMPLING SYSTEM ( 85-17 )( 85-47 ) ($.or) .A'C- O' 8422-006 9 T-RP. 84525 FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, & SUPPLIES ( 85-17 )( 85-47 )(g4.os) D d- T-RP ~ NUREG-0737, ITEM lil.A.2 0 0 8505-001 13 i i . I !
! l
,
i
,,m,. . + - ..-
}}