ML20149H144
| ML20149H144 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 07/21/1997 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20149H136 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-458-97-11, NUDOCS 9707240232 | |
| Download: ML20149H144 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000458/1997011
Text
.
.
.
.
.
.
ENCLOSURE 2
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
Docket No.:
50-458
l
License No.:
Report No.:
50-458/97-11-
Licensee:
Entergy Operations, Inc.
Facility:
River Bend Station
Location:
5485 U.S. Highway 61
St. Francisville, Louisiana
Dates:
June 23-27,1997
Inspector:
Thomas W. Dexter, Senior Physical Security Specialist
Plant Support Branch
Approved By:
Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
i
ATTACHMENT: Supplemental Information
l
i
DOCUMENT CONTAINS
ENCLOSURE CONTAINS
' SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
UPON SEPARATION THIS
9707240232 970721
ADOCK 05000458
PAGE IS DECONTROLLED
G
,
. . ,
. ..
.
>
-2-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
River Bend Station
NRC Inspection Report 50-458/97 11
This routine, announced inspection focused upon specific areas of the licensee's physical
,
security program. These' areas included review'of records and reports, testing and
maintenance, vital area barriers and detection aids, alarm stations,' communications,
lighting, security plans and procedures,' compensatory measures, access control of
personnel and packages,~ management support, and security program audits.
Plant Sucoort
- A very good records and reports program was in place. Trending and analysis was
.*
excellent'(Seetion S1 1).-
Security systems were repaired in a timely manner. An excellent testing and
maintenance program was conducted and was properly documented (Section S2.1).
,
. Vital barriers would provide effective delay of any barrier penetration attempts.
Controls of security locks and keys was very good (Section S2.2).
t
The alarm stations were redundant and well protected. The operators were ofert
and well trained (Section~ S2.3)
. A good security radio communication system was maintained. A proper number of
portable radios was available for members of the security organization
1
J
'(Section S2.4);
. Security lighting inside the protected area was excellent. The protected area was
- -
maintained free of clutter (Section S2.5)
Security plan changes were submitted in accordance with NRC requirements and
1
the changes had not decreased the effectiveness of the plans. Security procedures
were consistent with the securityf plans (Section S3.1).
.
A violation was identified involving the failure of the video capture system to have
l
audible alarm capabilities. Security personnel were well trained on the program
requirements (Section S4.1).
]
- DOCUMENT CONTAINS
ENCLOSURE CONTAINS
' SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
l
UPON SEPARATION THIS
~'
PAGE IS DECONTROLLED
,
"
-~
- - - - - - .
.
.
_ _
.
~
a
3-
A very good program for searching personnel and packages was maintained.
Security personnel operating the equipment were well trained (Section S4.2)
Senior management support for the security organization was strong. The security
- -
program was implemented by a well trained and highly qualified staff
(Section S6.1).
The annual security prcgram audit was performance based. The overall quality of
the audit was excellent (Section S71).
,
DOCUMENT CONTAINS
ENCLOSURE CONTAINS
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
UPON SEPARATION THIS
PAGE lS DECONTROLLED