|
|
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 16, 2010 LICENSEE: | | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 16, 2010 LICENSEE: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC FACILITY: Seabrook Station, Unit 1 |
| NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC FACILITY: | |
| Seabrook Station, Unit 1 | |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:== | | ==SUBJECT:== |
|
| |
|
| ==SUMMARY== | | ==SUMMARY== |
| OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 24, 2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC, CONCERNING THE REVIEW OF ACCEPTABILITY OF DOCKETING OF THE SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NES) held a telephone conference call on June 24,2010, to discuss potential issues found during the staff's review of acceptability for docketing of the license renewal application (LRA) for Seabrook Station. Bye-mail dated June 21, 2010, the staff sent topics that it wished to discuss with NES regarding the staff's review of acceptability for docketing of the LRA. NES reviewed the topics and consented to a telephone conference call. The telephone conference call was useful in answering the staff's preliminary questions. | | OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 24, 2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC, CONCERNING THE REVIEW OF ACCEPTABILITY OF DOCKETING OF THE SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NES) held a telephone conference call on June 24,2010, to discuss potential issues found during the staff's review of acceptability for docketing of the license renewal application (LRA) for Seabrook Station. |
| NES provided clarifications regarding the scoping report associated with the LRA. Based on the clarifications, the staff decided that these particular issues will not preclude acceptance for docketing of the LRA. The staff will verify the information in the scoping report during its onsite audits in September and October 2010. Enclosure 2 provides the topics that were forwarded to NES prior to the call. Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants. . The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary. Jeremy Susco, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-443 | | Bye-mail dated June 21, 2010, the staff sent topics that it wished to discuss with NES regarding the staff's review of acceptability for docketing of the LRA. NES reviewed the topics and consented to a telephone conference call. The telephone conference call was useful in answering the staff's preliminary questions. NES provided clarifications regarding the scoping report associated with the LRA. Based on the clarifications, the staff decided that these particular issues will not preclude acceptance for docketing of the LRA. The staff will verify the information in the scoping report during its onsite audits in September and October 2010. provides the topics that were forwarded to NES prior to the call. provides a listing of the participants. . |
| | The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary. |
| | Jeremy Susco, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-443 |
|
| |
|
| ==Enclosures:== | | ==Enclosures:== |
|
| |
|
| As stated cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SEABROOK STATION, UNIT LICENSE RENEWAL LIST OF June PARTICIPANTS Jeremy Susco Kimberly Green Bo Pham David Wrona Stanley Gardocki Garry Armstrong Rick Cliche Ali Kodal Martin Peters Neil Pietrantonio Gary Kilby Ken Chew Tom Casey Don Arp Brian Dunn Ken Putnam AFFILIATIONS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) NRC NRC NRC NRC NRC NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NES) NES NES NES NES NES NES NES NextEra Energy Resources Duane Arnold Energy Center ENCLOSURE Seabrook Station, Unit License Renewal Application Staff Questions Regarding Acceptance for The Balance-of-Plant Branch (SBPB) has performed an. acceptance review of the Seabrook Station license renewal application (LRA). The staff has identified two areas where the applicant may not have performed a complete scoping review that may significantly affect the ability of the staff to accomplish its review. If the applicant has not completed a comprehensive scoping review and requires additional time to complete scoping of additional structures, systems, and components (SSCs) (e.g., turbine building systems), then the scheduled review time allotted to the staff would be affected. | | As stated cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv |
| Acceptance Review -SBPB -1 In LRA Section 2.4.4 and on LRA boundary drawing LR-001, the applicant identifies the structures within the scope of license renewal under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1).
| | |
| The LRA boundary drawing shows structures that were not included in the scope of license renewal (e.g., maintenance facility, asphalt building, nearby structures, demineralized water storage tanks) attached to the structures in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1).
| | TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS June 24,2010 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Jeremy Susco U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) |
| In accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2), the applicant should include in the scope of license renewal any structure or component with the potential to adversely affect an (a)(1) component or structure.
| | Kimberly Green NRC Bo Pham NRC David Wrona NRC Stanley Gardocki NRC Garry Armstrong NRC Rick Cliche NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NES) |
| In LRA Section 2.3.3.34, the applicant states: The Roof Drains System boundary consists of those plant roof drains that enter safety-related buildings, including connections and cleanouts until the piping leaves the building to the storm drains. The buildings with in-boundary Roof Drain piping are the Fuel Storage Building, East and West Main Steam and Feedwater Pipe Chases, Emergency Feedwater Pump House, Equipment Vaults, Primary Auxiliary Building, Tank Farm, Control Building, Diesel Generator Building and Service Water Pump House. The list of structures in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) is more extensive than these structures.
| | Ali Kodal NES Martin Peters NES Neil Pietrantonio NES Gary Kilby NES Ken Chew NES Tom Casey NES Don Arp NES Brian Dunn NextEra Energy Resources Ken Putnam Duane Arnold Energy Center ENCLOSURE 1 |
| Hence, the applicant may have limited their evaluation of systems that have a potential adverse affects on (a)(1) components to a select number of buildings.
| |
| The applicant may not have performed a complete evaluation required by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) for all the structures and systems with potential to affect all the structures they identified as in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1).
| |
| Therefore, the application does not contain sufficient information for the staff to determine if the applicant performed an evaluation of SSCs that can possibly interface with the (a)(1) structures in accordance with the guidance provided in NEI 95-10 and 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).
| |
| Acceptance Review -SBPB -2 The staff has identified several SSCs that have the potential for being included in the scope of license renewal in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) that are potentially located in the turbine building.
| |
| In LRA Section 2.1.2.2.3, the applicant states that they took an exception to the
| |
| -methodology in NEI 95-10 for scoping structures and components in the turbine building.
| |
| The LRA does not provide adequate information for the staff to make a determination if the SSCs should have been included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1), requiring a evaluation of surrounding SSCs in the turbine building to be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).
| |
| Some of the SSCs that may be in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) are: Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Chapter 15 credits the feedwater regulating valves as means to isolate main feedwater in the event of a main steam line break. The applicant did not include the regulating valves in the scope of license renewal. SSCs credited for mitigating design basis events should be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1
| |
| ). LRA Section 2.3.4.6 states that additional redundant pumping capability is provided by the startup feed pump in the feedwater system. Technical Specification 3.7.1.2 for Seabrook Station requires three independent auxiliary feedwater pumps and flow paths, of which the startup feed pump is credited.
| |
| The licensee can continue power operations without any emergency feedwater pumps with only the startup feed pump operable for up to 12 hours. The safety significance of the startup pump would qualify the pump to be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1). The startup feedwater pump is powered by emergency bus; hence the associated cabling in the turbine building would be safety-related.
| |
| In addition, the applicant identified elements of the reactor protection system and engineered safety features actuation system as safety-related in the turbine building.
| |
| Even though the functions may be not be credited in the current licensing basis, these components and their associated power supplies and signal cabling have the potential to adversely affect other safety-related components.
| |
| Therefore, any SSCs that have the potential to adversely affect these components and cabling should be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).
| |
| Therefore, the application does not have sufficient information for the staff to determine whether components in the turbine building should have been considered to be in scope for license renewal as defined in 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).
| |
| July 16, 2010 LICENSEE:
| |
| NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC FACILITY:
| |
| Seabrook Station, Unit 1
| |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:==
| | Seabrook Station, Unit 1 License Renewal Application (LRA) |
| | Staff Questions Regarding Acceptance for Docketing The Balance-of-Plant Branch (SBPB) has performed an. acceptance review of the Seabrook Station license renewal application (LRA). The staff has identified two areas where the applicant may not have performed a complete scoping review that may significantly affect the ability of the staff to accomplish its review. If the applicant has not completed a comprehensive scoping review and requires additional time to complete scoping of additional structures, systems, and components (SSCs) (e.g., turbine building systems), then the scheduled review time allotted to the staff would be affected. |
| | Acceptance Review - SBPB -1 In LRA Section 2.4.4 and on LRA boundary drawing LR-001, the applicant identifies the structures within the scope of license renewal under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1). The LRA boundary drawing shows structures that were not included in the scope of license renewal (e.g., |
| | maintenance facility, asphalt building, nearby structures, demineralized water storage tanks) attached to the structures in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2), the applicant should include in the scope of license renewal any structure or component with the potential to adversely affect an (a)(1) component or structure. |
| | In LRA Section 2.3.3.34, the applicant states: |
| | The Roof Drains System boundary consists of those plant roof drains that enter safety-related buildings, including connections and cleanouts until the piping leaves the building to the storm drains. The buildings with in-boundary Roof Drain piping are the Fuel Storage Building, East and West Main Steam and Feedwater Pipe Chases, Emergency Feedwater Pump House, Equipment Vaults, Primary Auxiliary Building, Tank Farm, Control Building, Diesel Generator Building and Service Water Pump House. |
| | The list of structures in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) is more extensive than these structures. |
| | Hence, the applicant may have limited their evaluation of systems that have a potential adverse affects on (a)(1) components to a select number of buildings. The applicant may not have performed a complete evaluation required by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) for all the structures and systems with potential to affect all the structures they identified as in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1). Therefore, the application does not contain sufficient information for the staff to determine if the applicant performed an evaluation of SSCs that can possibly interface with the (a)(1) structures in accordance with the guidance provided in NEI 95-10 and 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2). |
| | Acceptance Review - SBPB - 2 The staff has identified several SSCs that have the potential for being included in the scope of license renewal in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) that are potentially located in the turbine building. In LRA Section 2.1.2.2.3, the applicant states that they took an exception to the |
|
| |
|
| ==SUMMARY==
| | - 2 methodology in NEI 95-10 for scoping structures and components in the turbine building. The LRA does not provide adequate information for the staff to make a determination if the SSCs should have been included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1), requiring a evaluation of surrounding SSCs in the turbine building to be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2). |
| OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 24, 2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC, CONCERNING THE REVIEW OF ACCEPTABILITY OF DOCKETING OF THE SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NES) held a telephone conference call on June 24, 2010, to discuss potential issues found during the staff's review of acceptability for docketing of the license renewal application (LRA) for Seabrook Station. Bye-mail dated June 21,2010, the staff sent topics that it wished to discuss with NES regarding the staff's review of acceptability for docketing of the LRA. NES reviewed the topics and consented to a telephone conference call. The telephone conference call was useful in answering the staff's preliminary questions.
| | Some of the SSCs that may be in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) are: |
| NES provided clarifications regarding the scoping report associated with the LRA. Based on the clarifications, the staff decided that these particular issues will not preclude acceptance for docketing of the LRA. The staff will verify the information in the scoping report during its onsite audits in September and October 2010. Enclosure 2 provides the topics that were forwarded to NES prior to the call. Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants.
| | : 1) Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Chapter 15 credits the feedwater regulating valves as means to isolate main feedwater in the event of a main steam line break. The applicant did not include the regulating valves in the scope of license renewal. SSCs credited for mitigating design basis events should be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1 ). |
| The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary. IRA! Jeremy Susco, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-443
| | : 2) LRA Section 2.3.4.6 states that additional redundant pumping capability is provided by the startup feed pump in the feedwater system. Technical Specification 3.7.1.2 for Seabrook Station requires three independent auxiliary feedwater pumps and flow paths, of which the startup feed pump is credited. The licensee can continue power operations without any emergency feedwater pumps with only the startup feed pump operable for up to 12 hours. The safety significance of the startup pump would qualify the pump to be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1). |
| | : 3) The startup feedwater pump is powered by emergency bus; hence the associated cabling in the turbine building would be safety-related. In addition, the applicant identified elements of the reactor protection system and engineered safety features actuation system as safety-related in the turbine building. Even though the functions may be not be credited in the current licensing basis, these components and their associated power supplies and signal cabling have the potential to adversely affect other safety-related components. Therefore, any SSCs that have the potential to adversely affect these components and cabling should be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2). |
| | Therefore, the application does not have sufficient information for the staff to determine whether components in the turbine building should have been considered to be in scope for license renewal as defined in 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2). |
|
| |
|
| ==Enclosures:==
| | .. ML101800207 OFFICE PM:RPB1 :DLR LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB1 :DLR PM:RPB1:DLR NAME JSU5CO SFigueroa RPlasse BPham JSusco DATE 07/12/10 ~ 07/12/10 07/13/10 07116110 |
|
| |
|
| As stated cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
| | Memorandum to NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC from J. Susco dated July 16, 2010 SUB~IECT: |
| See next page ADAMS Accession No... ML101800207 OFFICE PM:RPB1 :DLR LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB1 :DLR PM:RPB1:DLR NAME JSU5CO SFigueroa RPlasse BPham JSusco DATE 07/12/10 07/12/10 07/13/10 07116110 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Memorandum to NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC from J. Susco dated July 16, 2010
| |
|
| |
|
| ==SUMMARY== | | ==SUMMARY== |
| OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 24,2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC, CONCERNING THE REVIEW OF ACCEPTABILITY OF DOCKETING OF THE SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION DISTRI BUTION: HARD COPY: DLR RF E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDraApla Resource JSusco RPlasse BPham DWrona EMilier ICouret, OPA EDacus,OCA MSpencer, OGC WRaymond, RI DTifft, RI NMcNamara, RI NSheehan, RI DScrenci, RI JJohnson, RI ABurritt, RI}} | | OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 24,2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC, CONCERNING THE REVIEW OF ACCEPTABILITY OF DOCKETING OF THE SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION DISTRI BUTION: |
| | HARD COPY: |
| | DLR RF E-MAIL: |
| | PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDraApla Resource JSusco RPlasse BPham DWrona EMilier ICouret, OPA EDacus,OCA MSpencer, OGC WRaymond, RI DTifft, RI NMcNamara, RI NSheehan, RI DScrenci, RI JJohnson, RI ABurritt, RI}} |
|
---|
Category:Conference/Symposium/Workshop Paper
MONTHYEARML15328A1392015-12-0404 December 2015 November 23, 2015, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning Requests for Additional Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station ML11327A0722011-11-30030 November 2011 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on November 22, 2011, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning the Response to the Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Seabrook St ML11294A1042011-11-0101 November 2011 2/3/11, Summary of Telecon Call Held Between USNRC and NextEra Seabrook, Llc. Concerning Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station LRA ML11143A1652011-06-15015 June 2011 5/18/11, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning the D-RAI Pertaining to the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application ML1105603622011-03-0101 March 2011 2/3/11 Summary of Telephone Conference Calls Held Between the USNRC and Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC, to Clarify Information Pertaining to the Review of the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application ML1018002072010-07-16016 July 2010 June 24, 2010, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning the Review of Acceptability of Docketing of the Seabrook Station, Unit 1, License Renewal Application 2015-12-04
[Table view] Category:Meeting Summary
MONTHYEARML23187A4432023-07-11011 July 2023 6/27/2023, Annual Assessment Meeting for Seabrook Station - Meeting Summary ML23086B9962023-04-0404 April 2023 Summary of March 7, 2023, Meeting with Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC Regarding Planned Submittal of License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Action Level Due to Modification to Containment Fire Detection Equipment ML23088A1522023-03-29029 March 2023 Summary of Meeting Between Nrc/Region I and C-10 - Questions Regarding Seabrook 4Q2022 Inspection Report ML22144A0022022-09-14014 September 2022 Summary of February 16, and May 18, 2022, Meetings with Nextera Energy/Florida Power & Light Company Regarding Planned Submittal of License Amendment Request for a Common Fleet Emergency Plan ML22146A3422022-06-13013 June 2022 February 23, Summary of Meetings with Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC Regarding Planned Submittal of License Amendment Request to Update Pressure-Temperature Limits Curves Period of Applicability ML22153A1672022-06-0202 June 2022 Annual Assessment Meeting for Seabrook Station - Meeting Summary ML21336A4072021-12-0707 December 2021 Summary of Conference Call Regarding the Fall 2021 Steam Generator Tube Inspections ML21168A1522021-06-22022 June 2021 Annual Assessment Meeting Summary ML20174A2682020-06-22022 June 2020 June 3, 2020, Seabrook Annual Assessment Summary ML19073A0172019-03-21021 March 2019 Summary of Meeting with Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC, on Proposed Relief Requests for the Containment Spray System for the Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 ML19046A3832019-02-26026 February 2019 Meeting Summary of February 13, 2019, Public Meeting in Hampton, New Hampshire Alkali-Silica Reaction License Amendment Request and License Renewal Application ML18136A9052018-05-31031 May 2018 Summary of April 25, 2017, Meeting with Florida Power & Light Company/Nextera Energy Regarding Planned Submittal of Exemption Requests to Support Closure of NRC Generic Safety Issue 191/NRC Generic Letter 2004-02 ML18135A2462018-05-31031 May 2018 Summary of April 24, 2018, Meeting with Florida Power & Light Company/Nextera Energy Regarding Planned Submittal of License Amendment Request to Adopt Standard Technical Specification 3.0.6 ML18142A2932018-05-21021 May 2018 2018 Annual Assessment Meeting Summary ML17340A1862017-12-14014 December 2017 Summary of November 17, 2017, Meeting with NextEra Energy Regarding License Amendment Request on Alkali Silica Reaction - Requests for Additional Information (CAC No. MF8260; EPID L-2016-LLA-0007) ML17310B2062017-11-20020 November 2017 Summary of September 20, 2017, Meeting with Florida Power & Light Company and NextEra Energy Regarding Closure of NRC Generic Safety Issue 191/NRC Generic Letter 2004-02 ML17278A7482017-10-13013 October 2017 Summary of August 24, 2017, Meeting with NextEra Energy Regarding License Amendment Request on Alkali Silica Reaction (CAC No. MF8260; EPID L-2016-LLA-0007) ML17216A1732017-09-0707 September 2017 Notice of Meeting with Florida Power & Light Company and NextEra Energy to Discuss Closing Out Generic Safety Issue-191 and Generic Letter 2004-02 ML17172A1322017-06-20020 June 2017 Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting for Seabrook Station, Unit 1, Held on 6/7/2017 ML17137A0292017-06-0505 June 2017 Summary of Meeting Held on May 9, 2017, Between the USNRC Staff and NextEra Representatives to Discuss the Seabrook License Renewal Application (CAC No. ME4028) ML16341B9022017-03-0707 March 2017 03/07/2016 Summary of Telecon Held on Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and NextEra Energy Seabrook Concerning Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application ML16342C4672017-03-0101 March 2017 12/01/2016 Summary of Teleconference Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and NextEra Energy Seabrook Concerning Requests for Additional Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application ML16204A2612016-07-29029 July 2016 June 15, 2016 Summary of Pre-Submittal Meeting with NextEra Energy Regarding Proposed License Amendment on Alkali Silica Reaction for the Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 ML16190A1812016-07-0808 July 2016 Summary of Public Annual Assessment Meeting ML16168A4122016-06-15015 June 2016 Slides for Public Meeting with NextEra Energy Regarding Seabrook Station ASR License Amendment ML16146A1762016-06-0808 June 2016 April 28, 2016, Summary of Public Meeting with NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Regarding Aging Management of Alkali-Silica Reaction Pertaining to the License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1 ML15343A1862016-01-0707 January 2016 License Renewal Call Summary - December 3, 2015 ML15357A3262015-12-23023 December 2015 Memo-Seabrook Conference Call on Dec. 22, 2015-with NextEra Concerning a Request for Additional Information Pertaining to Seabrook Station Operability Determinations for the Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR)-affected Containment Enclosure Buildi ML15328A1392015-12-0404 December 2015 November 23, 2015, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning Requests for Additional Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station ML15190A0872015-07-0707 July 2015 June 18, 2015, Summary of Meeting - Seabrook Annual Assessment ML14190B0132014-07-0909 July 2014 June 24, 2014, Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting Regarding Seabrook Station ML14035A2362014-01-30030 January 2014 Seabrook, Unit 1 - Summary of Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and NextEra Regarding the Status of Alkali-Silica Reaction Testing Program ML13352A5112013-12-27027 December 2013 13-12-18 Seabrook Conference Call Re SAMA RAI ML13133A2412013-06-12012 June 2013 5/9/2013 - Summary of Meeting with NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC on Pre-Submittal of a Fixed Incore Detector License Amendment Request ML13158A1972013-06-0707 June 2013 5/30/2013 Summary of Teleconference Between NRC Staff and NextEra Energy Staff Regarding Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Seabrook ML13099A2582013-04-0909 April 2013 3/27/2013: Seabrook - Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting with NextEra Energy ML13066A4882013-03-21021 March 2013 Summary of Meeting Held on February 21, 2013, Between the NRC and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLS Regarding License Renewal Application, Seabrook Station ML13004A1782013-01-0404 January 2013 December 11, 2012 Summary of Meeting Regarding Status of Degraded Concrete on Seabrook Station, Unit 1, ML12278A2502012-11-0101 November 2012 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and NextEra Seabrook, Concerning the RAIs Pertaining to the Seabrook Station, LRA ML12264A6482012-10-16016 October 2012 8/31/2012, Telecon Summary Between NRC and NextEra Seabrook ML12242A5612012-09-18018 September 2012 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on August 28, 2012, Between NRC and NextEra Sebrook, LLC, Concerning the Drai Pertaining to the Seabrook, LRA ML12339A2742012-09-13013 September 2012 Concrete Summary 4-12 ML12195A1112012-07-31031 July 2012 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on July 3, 2012, Between the NRC and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning the Draft Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station, LRA Er ML12165A5952012-06-22022 June 2012 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on May 16, 2012, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning the Response to Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station LRA ML12164A9012012-06-22022 June 2012 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on 5/24/12, Between the NRC and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Concerning the Drai Pertaining to the Seabrook Station LRA ML12164A7562012-06-22022 June 2012 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Between NRC and NextEra Seabrook ML12165A7422012-06-21021 June 2012 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on April 10, 2012, Between NRC and Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning the Response to Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station LRA ML12142A0422012-05-21021 May 2012 Summary of Public Meeting to Discuss the Nrc'S Annual Assessment of Nextera'S Safety Performance at Seabrook in 2011 ML12054A7662012-03-26026 March 2012 022312, Telecon Summary Between NRC and NextEra Seabrook, Discussing RAIs Response ML12066A1392012-03-20020 March 2012 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on March 1, 2012 Between the NRC and NextEra Energy Seabrook Llc., Concerning the Drai Pertaining to the Seabrook Station, LRA Environmental Review 2023-07-11
[Table view] Category:Memoranda
MONTHYEARML23053A0502023-02-22022 February 2023 Cover Memo and Response to C-10 Questions Regarding 3Q2022 Inspection Report ML22306A0202022-11-0202 November 2022 Cover Memo and Response to C-10 Questions Regarding 2Q2022 Inspection Report ML21242A2242021-08-26026 August 2021 C-10 Research & Education Foundation Memo Dated 8/26/21 Re Questions Regarding the 2021 Second Quarter Integrated Inspection Report (05000443/2021002) ML21062A1462021-04-21021 April 2021 Memo to File: Final Ea/Fonsi of 2012 and 2015 Decommissioning Funding Plans for Seabrook Station Unit 1 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (2012 and 2015) ML19057A3832019-03-0404 March 2019 Renewal of Full-Power Operating License for Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 ML19058A2162019-03-0404 March 2019 Update to Proposed Issuance of a Final No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination and License Amendment Regarding Which a Hearing Has Been Requested (CAC No. MF8260; EPID L-2016-LLA-0007) ML18226A2052018-09-28028 September 2018 Redacted, Submission of Alkali-Silica Reaction License Amendment Request Draft Safety Evaluation to Support Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Review of Seabrook License Renewal (CAC No. MF8260; EPID L-2016-LLA-0007) ML18243A4522018-08-31031 August 2018 License Renewal Application Memorandum ML17278A1662017-10-0505 October 2017 Teleconference Meeting Summary Dated August 28, 2017 with Massachusetts Attorney General'S Office and Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency ML17254A7522017-09-0606 September 2017 Alkali-Silica Reaction Issue Technical Team Charter Revision 2 ML16088A2042016-03-28028 March 2016 Memo T Bowers from s Ruffin, Technical Assistance Requests - Review 2015 Tri-Annual Decommissioning Funding Plans for Multiple Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations W/ Encl 2 (Template) ML16088A2052016-03-28028 March 2016 Enclosure 1 - (72.30 DFP Reviews to Be Completed 2015) - Memo T Bowers from s Ruffin, Technial Assistance Requests - Review 2015 Tri-Annual Decommissioning Funding Plans for Multiple Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations ML16056A3342016-03-0101 March 2016 Memorandum to File Regarding Transcript for 10 CFR 2.206 Petition from C-10 Research & Education Foundation Regarding Seabrook Station, Unit 1 ML15096A1682015-07-27027 July 2015 Memorandum to File from John Lamb, DORL, NRR No Significant Hazards Consideration Analysis and Categorical Exclusion Related to Proposed Exemption ML14014A3782014-02-19019 February 2014 Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) Issue Technical Team Charter, Revision 1 ML13193A0742013-07-16016 July 2013 Request for Additional Information - Seabrook Station Regarding Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (Tac No. MF0837) ML13128A5212013-06-10010 June 2013 Memo Position Paper -Assessment of Aci 318-71 as Design Basis for Category I Concrete Structures Affected by Alkalisilica Reaction at Seabrook Station. ML13154A5052013-06-0404 June 2013 Rai'S Following Ifib Analysis of NextEra Energy'S 2013 Decommissioning Funding Status Reports for Seabrook ML13099A2152013-04-18018 April 2013 Forthcoming Meeting with Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC (Nextera) Regarding a Pre-Submittal for a Fixed Incore Detector License Amendment Request ML13066A4882013-03-21021 March 2013 Summary of Meeting Held on February 21, 2013, Between the NRC and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLS Regarding License Renewal Application, Seabrook Station ML12242A3702012-09-0505 September 2012 Request for Deviation from the Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix to Provide Increased Oversight of the Alkali-Silica Reaction Issue at Seabrook ML12236A3852012-08-23023 August 2012 Memo Summary of NextEra Energy Seabrook Drop in Visit and Slides, August 22, 2012 ML12222A0392012-08-0909 August 2012 8/16/2012 Cancellation Notice of Forthcoming Conference Call with NextEra Energy and Florida Power and Light Concerning Generic Letter 2004-02 and Request for NRC Staff Review of Draft Proposed Guideline for Strainer Fiber Bypass Test Proto ML12213A0612012-08-0101 August 2012 8/16/12 Forthcoming Conference Call with NextEra Energy and Florida Power & Light Concerning Generic Letter 2004-02 and Request for NRC Staff Review of Draft Proposed Guideline for Strainer Fiber Bypass Test Protocol ML12164A9012012-06-22022 June 2012 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on 5/24/12, Between the NRC and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Concerning the Drai Pertaining to the Seabrook Station LRA ML13196A2202012-06-0606 June 2012 Memo from B. Balsam, NRR and D. Logan, NRR to J. Susco, NRR on Summary of Section 7 Consultation Activities Related to the National Marine Fisheries Service'S Final Rule to List the Atlantic Sturgeon ML12174A0152012-06-0404 June 2012 Draft Letter from J. Clifford, Region I to R. Nelson, NRR; Subject: Request for Technical Assistance, Seabrook Station Alkali-Silica Reaction ML12174A0122012-06-0404 June 2012 Draft Letter from J. Clifford, Region I to R. Nelson, NRR; Subject: Request for Technical Assistance, Seabrook Station Alkali-Silica Reaction ML12173A4632012-06-0404 June 2012 Draft Letter from D. Roberts, Region I to R. Nelson, NRR; Subject: Request for Technical Assistance, Seabrook Station Alkali-Silica Reaction ML12174A0172012-06-0404 June 2012 Draft Letter from J. Clifford, Region I to R. Nelson, NRR; Subject: Request for Technical Assistance, Seabrook Station Alkali-Silica Reaction ML12173A4622012-06-0404 June 2012 Draft Letter from D. Roberts, Region I to J. Jolicoeur, NRR; Subject: Request for Technical Assistance, Seabrook Station Alkali-Silica Reaction ML1208600492012-03-23023 March 2012 Corrected Notice of Forthcoming Meeting with NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra) Regarding Seabrook Station Concrete Degradation ML12054A7312012-02-16016 February 2012 DRAFT- from James Clifford to Robert Nelson Request for Technical Assistance Seabrook Station ALKALI-SILICA Reaction, Draft 3 ML12054A7292012-02-16016 February 2012 DRAFT- from James Clifford to Robert Nelson Request for Technical Assistance Seabrook Station ALKALI-SILICA Reaction, Draft 5 ML12054A7282012-02-16016 February 2012 DRAFT- from James Clifford to Robert Nelson Request for Technical Assistance Seabrook Station ALKALI-SILICA Reaction, Draft 5 ML12054A7272012-02-16016 February 2012 DRAFT- from James Clifford to Robert Nelson Request for Technical Assistance Seabrook Station ALKALI-SILICA Reaction, Draft 4 ML12054A7042012-02-16016 February 2012 DRAFT- from Darrell Roberts to John Jolicoeur Request for Technical Assistance Seabrook Station ALKALI-SILICA Reaction, Draft 2 ML12054A7112012-02-16016 February 2012 DRAFT- from James Clifford to Robert Nelson Request for Technical Assistance Seabrook Station ALKALI-SILICA Reaction, Draft 6 ML12054A7122012-02-16016 February 2012 DRAFT- from James Clifford to Robert Nelson Request for Technical Assistance Seabrook Station ALKALI-SILICA Reaction, Draft 7 (2) ML12054A7142012-02-16016 February 2012 DRAFT- from James Clifford to Robert Nelson Request for Technical Assistance Seabrook Station ALKALI-SILICA Reaction, Draft 8 Comment ML12054A7132012-02-16016 February 2012 DRAFT- from James Clifford to Robert Nelson Request for Technical Assistance Seabrook Station ALKALI-SILICA Reaction, Draft 8 2010817 ML12054A7302012-02-16016 February 2012 DRAFT- from James Clifford to Robert Nelson Request for Technical Assistance Seabrook Station ALKALI-SILICA Reaction, Draft 3. Resolved ML11354A1182011-12-22022 December 2011 12/8/2011 Summary of Meeting Between NRC Staff and the Nuclear Energy Institute to Discuss Current License Renewal Topics ML11343A4482011-12-0909 December 2011 NextEra Drop in Meeting Summary and Slides from 11-14-2011 Meeting with Region-I ML11327A0722011-11-30030 November 2011 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on November 22, 2011, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning the Response to the Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Seabrook St ML11304A1662011-11-0404 November 2011 Summary of Tele Conf Call Held on 3/3/11, Between the USNRC and NextEra Energy Seabrook, Llc. Concerning Clarification of Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station Request for Additional Information Responses ML11304A1512011-11-0404 November 2011 Summary of Tele Conf Call Held on 4/8/11 Between USNRC and NextEra Energy Seabrook, Llc. Concerning Clarification of Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station Request for Additional Information Responses ML11304A1092011-11-0404 November 2011 Summary of Tele Conf Call Held on 5/31/11, Between the USNRC and Nextera Energy Seabrook, Llc., Concerning Clarification of Information Pertaining to the Seabrook LRA ML11277A0462011-10-26026 October 2011 Summary of Public Meetings Conducted to Discuss the Dseis Related to the Review of the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application ML11280A0452011-10-17017 October 2011 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on May 5, 2011, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning Clarification of Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station LRA 2023-02-22
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 16, 2010 LICENSEE: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC FACILITY: Seabrook Station, Unit 1
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 24, 2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC, CONCERNING THE REVIEW OF ACCEPTABILITY OF DOCKETING OF THE SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NES) held a telephone conference call on June 24,2010, to discuss potential issues found during the staff's review of acceptability for docketing of the license renewal application (LRA) for Seabrook Station.
Bye-mail dated June 21, 2010, the staff sent topics that it wished to discuss with NES regarding the staff's review of acceptability for docketing of the LRA. NES reviewed the topics and consented to a telephone conference call. The telephone conference call was useful in answering the staff's preliminary questions. NES provided clarifications regarding the scoping report associated with the LRA. Based on the clarifications, the staff decided that these particular issues will not preclude acceptance for docketing of the LRA. The staff will verify the information in the scoping report during its onsite audits in September and October 2010. provides the topics that were forwarded to NES prior to the call. provides a listing of the participants. .
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
Jeremy Susco, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-443
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS June 24,2010 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Jeremy Susco U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Kimberly Green NRC Bo Pham NRC David Wrona NRC Stanley Gardocki NRC Garry Armstrong NRC Rick Cliche NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NES)
Ali Kodal NES Martin Peters NES Neil Pietrantonio NES Gary Kilby NES Ken Chew NES Tom Casey NES Don Arp NES Brian Dunn NextEra Energy Resources Ken Putnam Duane Arnold Energy Center ENCLOSURE 1
Seabrook Station, Unit 1 License Renewal Application (LRA)
Staff Questions Regarding Acceptance for Docketing The Balance-of-Plant Branch (SBPB) has performed an. acceptance review of the Seabrook Station license renewal application (LRA). The staff has identified two areas where the applicant may not have performed a complete scoping review that may significantly affect the ability of the staff to accomplish its review. If the applicant has not completed a comprehensive scoping review and requires additional time to complete scoping of additional structures, systems, and components (SSCs) (e.g., turbine building systems), then the scheduled review time allotted to the staff would be affected.
Acceptance Review - SBPB -1 In LRA Section 2.4.4 and on LRA boundary drawing LR-001, the applicant identifies the structures within the scope of license renewal under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1). The LRA boundary drawing shows structures that were not included in the scope of license renewal (e.g.,
maintenance facility, asphalt building, nearby structures, demineralized water storage tanks) attached to the structures in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2), the applicant should include in the scope of license renewal any structure or component with the potential to adversely affect an (a)(1) component or structure.
In LRA Section 2.3.3.34, the applicant states:
The Roof Drains System boundary consists of those plant roof drains that enter safety-related buildings, including connections and cleanouts until the piping leaves the building to the storm drains. The buildings with in-boundary Roof Drain piping are the Fuel Storage Building, East and West Main Steam and Feedwater Pipe Chases, Emergency Feedwater Pump House, Equipment Vaults, Primary Auxiliary Building, Tank Farm, Control Building, Diesel Generator Building and Service Water Pump House.
The list of structures in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) is more extensive than these structures.
Hence, the applicant may have limited their evaluation of systems that have a potential adverse affects on (a)(1) components to a select number of buildings. The applicant may not have performed a complete evaluation required by 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) for all the structures and systems with potential to affect all the structures they identified as in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1). Therefore, the application does not contain sufficient information for the staff to determine if the applicant performed an evaluation of SSCs that can possibly interface with the (a)(1) structures in accordance with the guidance provided in NEI 95-10 and 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).
Acceptance Review - SBPB - 2 The staff has identified several SSCs that have the potential for being included in the scope of license renewal in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) that are potentially located in the turbine building. In LRA Section 2.1.2.2.3, the applicant states that they took an exception to the
- 2 methodology in NEI 95-10 for scoping structures and components in the turbine building. The LRA does not provide adequate information for the staff to make a determination if the SSCs should have been included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1), requiring a evaluation of surrounding SSCs in the turbine building to be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).
Some of the SSCs that may be in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) are:
- 1) Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Chapter 15 credits the feedwater regulating valves as means to isolate main feedwater in the event of a main steam line break. The applicant did not include the regulating valves in the scope of license renewal. SSCs credited for mitigating design basis events should be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1 ).
- 2) LRA Section 2.3.4.6 states that additional redundant pumping capability is provided by the startup feed pump in the feedwater system. Technical Specification 3.7.1.2 for Seabrook Station requires three independent auxiliary feedwater pumps and flow paths, of which the startup feed pump is credited. The licensee can continue power operations without any emergency feedwater pumps with only the startup feed pump operable for up to 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. The safety significance of the startup pump would qualify the pump to be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1).
- 3) The startup feedwater pump is powered by emergency bus; hence the associated cabling in the turbine building would be safety-related. In addition, the applicant identified elements of the reactor protection system and engineered safety features actuation system as safety-related in the turbine building. Even though the functions may be not be credited in the current licensing basis, these components and their associated power supplies and signal cabling have the potential to adversely affect other safety-related components. Therefore, any SSCs that have the potential to adversely affect these components and cabling should be included in scope under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).
Therefore, the application does not have sufficient information for the staff to determine whether components in the turbine building should have been considered to be in scope for license renewal as defined in 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).
.. ML101800207 OFFICE PM:RPB1 :DLR LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB1 :DLR PM:RPB1:DLR NAME JSU5CO SFigueroa RPlasse BPham JSusco DATE 07/12/10 ~ 07/12/10 07/13/10 07116110
Memorandum to NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC from J. Susco dated July 16, 2010 SUB~IECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 24,2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC, CONCERNING THE REVIEW OF ACCEPTABILITY OF DOCKETING OF THE SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION DISTRI BUTION:
HARD COPY:
DLR RF E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDraApla Resource JSusco RPlasse BPham DWrona EMilier ICouret, OPA EDacus,OCA MSpencer, OGC WRaymond, RI DTifft, RI NMcNamara, RI NSheehan, RI DScrenci, RI JJohnson, RI ABurritt, RI