ML15126A004: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = Letter, Request for Additional Information (RAI)
| document type = Letter, Request for Additional Information (RAI)
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
| project = TAC:MF4222
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:  UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001  May 15, 2015 
Mr. Vito Kaminskas Site Vice President - Nuclear Generation DTE Electric Company Fermi 2 - 280 OBA 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI  48166 SUBJECT:  REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE FERMI 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION - SET 34 (TAC NO. MF4222)
Dear Mr. Kaminskas:
By letter dated April 24, 2014, DTE Electric Company (DTE or the applicant) submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54, to renew the operating license NPF-43 for Fermi 2, for review by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff). The staff is reviewing the information contained in the license renewal application and has identified, in the enclosure, areas where additional information is needed to complete the review. This request for additional information was discussed with Ms. Lynne Goodman, and a mutually agreeable date for the response is within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3301 or e-mail Daneira.Melendez-Colon@nrc.gov. Sincerely, 
      /RA/  Daneira Meléndez-Colón, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-341  Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information
cc w/encl:  Listserv 
May 15, 2015 Mr. Vito Kaminskas Site Vice President - Nuclear Generation DTE Electric Company Fermi 2 - 280 OBA 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI  48166 SUBJECT:  REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE FERMI 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION - SET 34 (TAC NO. MF4222)
Dear Mr. Kaminskas:
By letter dated April 24, 2014, DTE Electric Company (DTE or the applicant) submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54, to renew the operating license NPF-43 for Fermi 2, for review by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff). The staff is reviewing the information contained in the license renewal application and has identified, in the enclosure, areas where additional information is needed to complete the review.
This request for additional information was discussed with Ms. Lynne Goodman, and a mutually agreeable date for the response is within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3301 or e-mail Daneira.Melendez-Colon@nrc.gov. Sincerely,        /RA/  Daneira Meléndez-Colón, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  Docket No. 50-341  Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information  cc w/encl:  Listserv  DISTRIBUTION: See next page  ADAMS Accession No.: ML15126A004    *Concurred via e-mail OFFICE LA:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR NAME YEdmonds DMeléndez-ColónYDíaz-SanabriaDMeléndez-Colón DATE 5/13 /15 5/13/15 5/14/15 5/15/15 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY SUBJECT:  REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE FERMI 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION - SET 34 (TAC NO. MF4222)
DISTRIBUTION:
E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsNrrPMFermi2 Resource
------------------------
D. Melendez-Colon Y. Diaz-Sanabria E. Keegan B. Wittick D. McIntyre, OPA B. Harris, OGC D. Roth, OGC M. Kunowski, RIII B. Kemker, RIII V. Mitlyng, RIII P. Chandrathil, RIII C. Lipa, RIII S. Sheldon, RIII 
ENCLOSURE FERMI 2  LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION  REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SET 34 (TAC NO. MF4222)  RAI B.1.10-3 Background:
By letter dated February 5, 2015, the applicant provided its response to request for additional information (RAI) 4.1-3. In this letter, the applicant stated that it implements inspections of the top guide assembly and its components in accordance with Technical Report Boiling Water Reactor Vessel and Internals Project (BWRVIP)-183.
Issue:
As of April 22, 2015, the staff has yet to issue formal endorsement of the BWRVIP-183 report.
Although the staff did issue its draft final safety evaluation report (draft FSER) for the BWRVIP-183 report to the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) BWRVIP main committee on December 13, 2011-to provide an opportunity to identify any proprietary information and clarify any factual inaccuracies-the staff has yet to receive any feedback from the EPRI BWRVIP main committee on the draft FSER. However, in the draft FSER, the staff imposed three (3) conditions for those BWR license renewal applicants that will be implementing the BWRVIP-183 report during the period of extended operation.
The staff needs clarification on how the applicant plans to address the objectives (e.g.,
inspection, flaw evaluation, repair criteria, etc.) of the BWR Vessel Internals Program for specific inspection and evaluation (I&E) activities of the top guide assembly and its components. Request:    (1) Clarify and justify which BWR Vessel Internals Program objectives (e.g., inspection, flaw evaluation, repair criteria, etc.) the applicant will accomplish using the BWRVIP-183 report when applying the report to specific I&E activities of the top guide assembly and its components.  (2) If the report will be used for flaw evaluations of the top guide assembly and its components, clarify how the flaw evaluation methodology will account for the following factors that may impact the flaw evaluation basis:    a. stress loads for potential flaws detected near component discontinuities b. conservative flaw growth assumptions in the methodology c. potential for and impact of severed beam locations if flaw growth assumptions in the flaw evaluation methodology are determined to be non-conservative for the top guide beam locations  (3) Update the license renewal application (LRA) and any additional enhancements to Aging Management Program (AMP) B.1.10, as appropriate. 
}}
}}

Revision as of 21:51, 21 March 2018

Requests for Additional Information for the Review of the Fermi 2 License Renewal Application-Set 34 (TAC No. MF4222)
ML15126A004
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/15/2015
From: Melendez-Colon D
License Renewal Projects Branch 1
To: Kaminskas V
DTE Electric Company
Melendez-Colon D,NRR/DLR, 415-3301
References
DLR-15-0254, TAC MF4222
Download: ML15126A004 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 May 15, 2015

Mr. Vito Kaminskas Site Vice President - Nuclear Generation DTE Electric Company Fermi 2 - 280 OBA 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE FERMI 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION - SET 34 (TAC NO. MF4222)

Dear Mr. Kaminskas:

By letter dated April 24, 2014, DTE Electric Company (DTE or the applicant) submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54, to renew the operating license NPF-43 for Fermi 2, for review by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff). The staff is reviewing the information contained in the license renewal application and has identified, in the enclosure, areas where additional information is needed to complete the review. This request for additional information was discussed with Ms. Lynne Goodman, and a mutually agreeable date for the response is within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3301 or e-mail Daneira.Melendez-Colon@nrc.gov. Sincerely,

/RA/ Daneira Meléndez-Colón, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-341 Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information

cc w/encl: Listserv

May 15, 2015 Mr. Vito Kaminskas Site Vice President - Nuclear Generation DTE Electric Company Fermi 2 - 280 OBA 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE FERMI 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION - SET 34 (TAC NO. MF4222)

Dear Mr. Kaminskas:

By letter dated April 24, 2014, DTE Electric Company (DTE or the applicant) submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54, to renew the operating license NPF-43 for Fermi 2, for review by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff). The staff is reviewing the information contained in the license renewal application and has identified, in the enclosure, areas where additional information is needed to complete the review.

This request for additional information was discussed with Ms. Lynne Goodman, and a mutually agreeable date for the response is within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3301 or e-mail Daneira.Melendez-Colon@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ Daneira Meléndez-Colón, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-341 Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Listserv DISTRIBUTION: See next page ADAMS Accession No.: ML15126A004 *Concurred via e-mail OFFICE LA:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR NAME YEdmonds DMeléndez-ColónYDíaz-SanabriaDMeléndez-Colón DATE 5/13 /15 5/13/15 5/14/15 5/15/15 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE FERMI 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION - SET 34 (TAC NO. MF4222)

DISTRIBUTION:

E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsNrrPMFermi2 Resource


D. Melendez-Colon Y. Diaz-Sanabria E. Keegan B. Wittick D. McIntyre, OPA B. Harris, OGC D. Roth, OGC M. Kunowski, RIII B. Kemker, RIII V. Mitlyng, RIII P. Chandrathil, RIII C. Lipa, RIII S. Sheldon, RIII

ENCLOSURE FERMI 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SET 34 (TAC NO. MF4222) RAI B.1.10-3 Background:

By letter dated February 5, 2015, the applicant provided its response to request for additional information (RAI) 4.1-3. In this letter, the applicant stated that it implements inspections of the top guide assembly and its components in accordance with Technical Report Boiling Water Reactor Vessel and Internals Project (BWRVIP)-183.

Issue:

As of April 22, 2015, the staff has yet to issue formal endorsement of the BWRVIP-183 report.

Although the staff did issue its draft final safety evaluation report (draft FSER) for the BWRVIP-183 report to the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) BWRVIP main committee on December 13, 2011-to provide an opportunity to identify any proprietary information and clarify any factual inaccuracies-the staff has yet to receive any feedback from the EPRI BWRVIP main committee on the draft FSER. However, in the draft FSER, the staff imposed three (3) conditions for those BWR license renewal applicants that will be implementing the BWRVIP-183 report during the period of extended operation.

The staff needs clarification on how the applicant plans to address the objectives (e.g.,

inspection, flaw evaluation, repair criteria, etc.) of the BWR Vessel Internals Program for specific inspection and evaluation (I&E) activities of the top guide assembly and its components. Request: (1) Clarify and justify which BWR Vessel Internals Program objectives (e.g., inspection, flaw evaluation, repair criteria, etc.) the applicant will accomplish using the BWRVIP-183 report when applying the report to specific I&E activities of the top guide assembly and its components. (2) If the report will be used for flaw evaluations of the top guide assembly and its components, clarify how the flaw evaluation methodology will account for the following factors that may impact the flaw evaluation basis: a. stress loads for potential flaws detected near component discontinuities b. conservative flaw growth assumptions in the methodology c. potential for and impact of severed beam locations if flaw growth assumptions in the flaw evaluation methodology are determined to be non-conservative for the top guide beam locations (3) Update the license renewal application (LRA) and any additional enhancements to Aging Management Program (AMP) B.1.10, as appropriate.