ML23200A255
| ML23200A255 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 06/28/2023 |
| From: | April Nguyen NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | Angel J DTE Energy Company |
| Bryan Bergeon | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML22007A060 | List: |
| References | |
| NRC-23-0045 | |
| Download: ML23200A255 (1) | |
Text
DTE Energy Company 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 DTE Confidential Material Enclosed - Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 June 28, 2023 10 CFR 55.40 NRC-23-0045 Ms. AprilNguyen, Chief, Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle, Illinois 60532-4352 Fermi 2 Power Plant NRC Docket No. 50-341 NRC Operating License No. NPF-43
Subject:
Fermi 2 Initial Licensed Operator Post-Exam Submittal Enclosed please find the post-exam submittal package for the Fermi 2 Initial License Examination that was delivered June 27, 2023. The following items are enclosed in the post-exam submittal package.
A photocopy of each applicant's ungraded answer sheet Each applicant's original answer sheet (graded)
The master examination with answer key, annotated with any changes made during exam administration Candidate questions and proctor responses during written exam administration (ES-4.3)
Post written exam candidate comments with explanation of acceptance or rejection by Fermi 2 management (ES-4.3)
Written exam seating chart (ES-4.3)
Confidential Material Enclosed - Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 This enclosure contains confidential material. Upon separation from the rest of the enclosure, this enclosure cover sheet is DECONTROLLED.
USNRC NRC-23-0045 Page 2 Confidential Material Enclosed - Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 Written examination performance analysis per MNT16, Systematic Approach to Training Process-(SAT).
Completed original Form 1.3-1, Examination Security Agreement The examination materials were developed using the appropriate guidance-contained in NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,"
Revision 12.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the contents of the items listed above, please contact Mr. Justin Angel - Director, Nuclear Training at (734) 586-4055.
Sincerely, Justin Angel Director - Nuclear Training Enclosure (Confidential): Post Exam Submittal Package (Confidential) cc:
[w/o Enclosure]
NRC Project Manager Reactor Projects Chief, Branch 2, Region III NRC Resident Office Document Control Desk, Washington DC Confidential Material Enclosed - Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 The enclosure to this letter contains confidential material.
Upon separation from the enclosure, this cover letter is DECONTROLLED.
Enclosure to NRC-23-0045 Post Exam Submittal Package (Confidential)
This enclosure contains confidential material. Upon separation from the rest of the enclosure, this enclosure cover sheet is DECONTROLLED.
ILT 2023 Exam Administration and Post-Examination Review Comments The class had no comments regarding exam administration or post-exam review.
EXAM ITEM ANALYSIS Exam ID# ILT 2023 NRC Exam Date Evaluation Instrument Administered: 6/27/2023 Number of Trainees Evaluated:
4 Section A - Any question receiving greater than 50% failure rate Q N/A List each question receiving greater than 50% failure rate.
Question Question Review Corrective Action Number Failure Rate Conclusion*
S96 100%
A Training Request TR 2023-0052
- Review
Conclusion:
A.
Insufficient training for the learning objective tested.
B Learning objectives not adequately covered in the lesson plan.
C.
Poorly worded or invalid learning objective.
D.
Poorly worded or invalid test item.
E.
Incorrect answer in the exam key.
F.
More than one correct answer.
G.
Question acceptable.
H.
Other (state reason in table or on additional sheet).
SectionB-Greaterthan25%overallexam failure AN/A Conclusion Summary Corrective Action Approved by:
cA~--Date: t&e23 Training Supervision DTC: TPMMNT DSN:MNNTl6009 Rev. 1 P1/i IP: I File: 1703.22 Issued: 9/22/2022 File: 0209.10 IP: I
Exam Proctor Log (ILT 2023 NRC Written Exam)
Date: 6/27/2023 Proctors: [redacted]
Examinees: [redacted]
Communications during exam:
Question Number Asked By Question/Comment Action Taken by proctor.
S94 SRO Applicant Asked if door number should be RAM2-2, vice RM2-2 as stated in the question.
Proctor double-checked the question (key) and the reference provided (Enclosure C 35.000.242) and stated to examinee that the question, as worded, is correct and refers to door RM2-2.
R04 SRO Applicant Asked what is meant by DIRECT and if it implied that operator actions would be taken into account for the direct result.
The proctor stated to answer the question based on the direct response of the plant for the conditions given in the stem and reiterated per NUREG-1021 Section 1.2, Guidelines for Taking NRC Exams, Paragraph B.8, you should assume that no operator actions have been taken, unless the stem of the question or the answer choices specifically state otherwise.
R04 RO Applicant Asked what is meant by DIRECT. He stated that a turbine trip will occur and a RFP trip (due to the conditions in the stem), but that a scram will occur later (due to lowering level).
The proctor stated to answer the question based on the direct response of the plant for the conditions given in the stem and that all information needed to answer the question is given in the stem.
R19 RO Applicant Asked what was meant by ONLY in Option A and if this means that it was indications of a non-confirmed fire.
The proctor stated that all information needed to answer the question was given in the question and that ONLY means that no other indications were received, other than that specified in option A (i.e., to consider the indications given in each option separately).
S90 SRO Applicant Stated that Both A and B are conditions and actions directed by the AOP (for loss of control air) and that he could not differentiate between the two.
I stated that all information needed to answer the question was given in the question.
S91 SRO Applicant Did not end up asking a question after he brought this up to the proctors desk.