ML20198L039: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 07100102/2012013]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.. - = - -              _-                    - - - - . - - -          - . -              _ - . = - - - . - .                  _ - . -_
{{#Wiki_filter:.. - = - -              _-                    - - - - . - - -          - . -              _ - . = - - - . - .                  _ - . -_
I 1
                                                                                                                                                    I
ENCLOSURIL1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION
  .
                                                                                                                                                    1
                                                                      ENCLOSURIL1
                                                                                                                                                    '
                                                                    NOTICE OF VIOLATION
                                                                                                                                                    :
                   , Nebraska Public Power District                                          Docket No.:            50 298                        :
                   , Nebraska Public Power District                                          Docket No.:            50 298                        :
Cooper Nuclear Station                                                    License No.:          DPR-46 During an NRC inspection conducted on November 2 through December 13,1997,one                                                  ;
                    Cooper Nuclear Station                                                    License No.:          DPR-46
violation of NRC requirements was identified. in accordance with the " General Statement                                        ;
                    During an NRC inspection conducted on November 2 through December 13,1997,one                                                  ;
of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG 1600, the violr'. son b listed below:
                    violation of NRC requirements was identified. in accordance with the " General Statement                                        ;
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by procedures of a type appropriate to the circumstances.
                                                                                                                                                    '
These procedures shallinclude appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisf actorily accomplished.
                    of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG 1600, the violr'. son b listed
Contrary to the above, as of December 13,1997, Procedure 6.SC.502, " Secondary Containment Penetration Examination," Revision 2, which conducts an assessment of air in leakage through redundant secondary containment doors, an activity affecting quality, was not appropriate to the circumstances in that it did not include appropriate acceptance criteria. This procedure summed the minimum door leakage in each set of two doors to establish the secondary containment in leakage rate. The use of the minimum in leakage for each door set was potentially nonconservative.                                        ;
                    below:
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) (50 298/9710-01).
                            10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires, in part, that activities affecting
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Nebraska Public Power District is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV,611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector at the f acility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for sach violation: (1) the reason for ^e violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the
                            quality shall be prescribed by procedures of a type appropriate to the circumstances.
                   - required response, if an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, su> pended,' or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the -
                            These procedures shallinclude appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance
response time.
                            criteria for determining that important activities have been satisf actorily
Because your responso will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the
                            accomplished.
!                  extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards p
                            Contrary to the above, as of December 13,1997, Procedure 6.SC.502, " Secondary
9901150149              12 l                PDR    ADOCK O          298 l                G                        PDR i
                            Containment Penetration Examination," Revision 2, which conducts an assessment
                            of air in leakage through redundant secondary containment doors, an activity
                            affecting quality, was not appropriate to the circumstances in that it did not include
                            appropriate acceptance criteria. This procedure summed the minimum door leakage
                            in each set of two doors to establish the secondary containment in leakage rate. The
                            use of the minimum in leakage for each door set was potentially nonconservative.                                        ;
                    This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) (50 298/9710-01).
                    Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Nebraska Public Power District is hereby
                    required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
                    Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the
                    Regional Administrator, Region IV,611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas
                    76011, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector at the f acility that is the subject of this
                    Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation
                    (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and
                    should include for sach violation: (1) the reason for ^e violation, or, if contested, the basis
                    for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results
                    achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the
                    date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference or include
                    previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the
                   - required response, if an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this
                    Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should
                    not be modified, su> pended,' or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should
                    not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the -
                    response time.
                    Because your responso will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the
!                  extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards
p
,
                9901150149              12
l                PDR    ADOCK O          298
l                G                        PDR
i
    ,      _ .      _ ,_                          -
                                                                                    _ . . . -
                                                                                                                          , _ _ - - -          . .


l-2 Information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. However, if you find it necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the it. formation from the public, Dated at Arlington, Texas this 12th day of January 1998
    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _                                    ...
                                                                                                                               .,}}
  .
l-
                                                                                2
                                  Information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. However, if you find it
                                  necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information
                                  that you desire not to be placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your
                                  request for withholding the it. formation from the public,
                                  Dated at Arlington, Texas
                                  this 12th day of January 1998
                                                                                                                               .,
}}

Latest revision as of 10:22, 8 September 2023

Notice of Violation from Insp on 971102-1213.Violation Noted:As of 971213,Procedure 6.SC.502,Rev 2,was Not Appropriate to Circumstances in That Did Not Include Appropriate Acceptance Criteria
ML20198L039
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/12/1998
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20198L034 List:
References
50-298-97-10, NUDOCS 9801150149
Download: ML20198L039 (2)
v • d • e


See also: IR 07100102/2012013

Text

.. - = - - _- - - - - . - - - - . - _ - . = - - - . - . _ - . -_

I

.

1

ENCLOSURIL1

'

NOTICE OF VIOLATION

, Nebraska Public Power District Docket No.: 50 298  :

Cooper Nuclear Station License No.: DPR-46

During an NRC inspection conducted on November 2 through December 13,1997,one  ;

violation of NRC requirements was identified. in accordance with the " General Statement  ;

'

of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG 1600, the violr'. son b listed

below:

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires, in part, that activities affecting

quality shall be prescribed by procedures of a type appropriate to the circumstances.

These procedures shallinclude appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance

criteria for determining that important activities have been satisf actorily

accomplished.

Contrary to the above, as of December 13,1997, Procedure 6.SC.502, " Secondary

Containment Penetration Examination," Revision 2, which conducts an assessment

of air in leakage through redundant secondary containment doors, an activity

affecting quality, was not appropriate to the circumstances in that it did not include

appropriate acceptance criteria. This procedure summed the minimum door leakage

in each set of two doors to establish the secondary containment in leakage rate. The

use of the minimum in leakage for each door set was potentially nonconservative.  ;

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) (50 298/9710-01).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Nebraska Public Power District is hereby

required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the

Regional Administrator, Region IV,611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas

76011, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector at the f acility that is the subject of this

Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation

(Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and

should include for sach violation: (1) the reason for ^e violation, or, if contested, the basis

for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results

achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the

date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference or include

previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the

- required response, if an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this

Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should

not be modified, su> pended,' or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should

not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the -

response time.

Because your responso will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the

! extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards

p

,

9901150149 12

l PDR ADOCK O 298

l G PDR

i

, _ . _ ,_ -

_ . . . -

, _ _ - - - . .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ...

.

l-

2

Information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. However, if you find it

necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information

that you desire not to be placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your

request for withholding the it. formation from the public,

Dated at Arlington, Texas

this 12th day of January 1998

.,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20198L039&oldid=3612696"