ML19210A904: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:*
{{#Wiki_filter:*
          ..
      #
DATE OF DOCUMENT:                                  DATE RECENED              NOJ athan M. Neumark                                                                                                                      .,- -t e J
DATE OF DOCUMENT:                                  DATE RECENED              NOJ athan M. Neumark                                                                                                                      .,- -t e J
                                   ...                7-27-71                                          7 '7-71 rhema, Illinois 618C                  -          wa.                                        = Eu o;          aEroar;                      OrwEa:
                                   ...                7-27-71                                          7 '7-71 rhema, Illinois 618C                  -          wa.                                        = Eu o;          aEroar;                      OrwEa:
x ORIGa                                      CG;            orM EJt 1                                          7 son G. Case AcnON Nacessaar                            O      co~cuaaEacE        O      o*TE ^~swEaEc NO ACTION NECE$$ARY O                              co==E~T            O      er:
x ORIGa                                      CG;            orM EJt 1                                          7 son G. Case AcnON Nacessaar                            O      co~cuaaEacE        O      o*TE ^~swEaEc NO ACTION NECE$$ARY O                              co==E~T            O      er:
                          * * ' " ' '            "'
50-289            { Consultant File)
* 50-289            { Consultant File)
RtG. NO*
RtG. NO*
N;(Must Be Unclassaf ted)                                        REFERRED TO                              DATE            RECENED av                  OATE review of Fg&R including Andts D Lange                                              7 71 0 of Three Mila Island Unit 1 ishing Final Report om design Wh2cvsforACTIN ysis.....
N;(Must Be Unclassaf ted)                                        REFERRED TO                              DATE            RECENED av                  OATE review of Fg&R including Andts D Lange                                              7 71 0 of Three Mila Island Unit 1 ishing Final Report om design Wh2cvsforACTIN ysis.....
Mam - omir
Mam - omir C            y *=g Files W. Prien & Suff Case /Esecary w w ./n,w w brig (W/ Orig & 1 e r (Ori g to be returned to 016) lp f I i' s .,
* C            y *=g Files W. Prien & Suff Case /Esecary w w ./n,w w brig (W/ Orig & 1 e r (Ori g to be returned to 016) lp f I i' s .,
f ;, i'. Ii"l'.t n'. ,?,o.'.
f ;, i'. Ii"l'.t n'. ,?,o.'.
it 1
it 1 ACKNOWLEDGED r .> J              fod u.s. ATOMC ENERGY COMMISSION
                                                                                                                                                      -
                                                                                                                                                      '"
ACKNOWLEDGED r .> J              fod u.s. ATOMC ENERGY COMMISSION
* MAllCONTROL FORM FOagEcp**s VERNMEN T PRIN TING OFFIC E 1970*406-979                _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ .
* MAllCONTROL FORM FOagEcp**s VERNMEN T PRIN TING OFFIC E 1970*406-979                _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ .
l          l    l\
l          l    l\
J Uj          O,#T 7911010 6/3                                A
J Uj          O,#T 7911010 6/3                                A


    .
h
h
_NATHAN        M. NEW.        .RK
_NATHAN        M. NEW.        .RK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES                            1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING URBANA. ILLINOIS 618ot 27 July 1971 v
*'
CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES                            1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING URBANA. ILLINOIS 618ot 27 July 1971
                -
                                                                                                      .
v
                                                                                      .
ag
ag
                                                                        .%
                                                                        '
                                                                             .                    y Mr. Edson G. Case, Director                                  'd                    ,w Division of Reactor Standards
                                                                             .                    y Mr. Edson G. Case, Director                                  'd                    ,w Division of Reactor Standards
                                                                          '
                                                                         ' .kx    -        -
                                                                         ' .kx    -        -
U.S. Atomic Energy Ccmmission Washington, D.C. 20545                                            N/h'
U.S. Atomic Energy Ccmmission Washington, D.C. 20545                                            N/h'
                                                                               'QN M <V,$2  9
                                                                               'QN M <V,$2  9 Fils Cy.
:-
Fils Cy.
Regulatory
Regulatory
           ~
           ~
Line 69: Line 50:
JUL291971 > ;
JUL291971 > ;
O          REGULATCRY    $                                            e-g      cl# cia                                    i539      Ima3
O          REGULATCRY    $                                            e-g      cl# cia                                    i539      Ima3
                      .
                         ~ t-
                         ~ t-
                                                                                               =
                                                                                               =
Line 76: Line 56:
. N        .                                                      ~                              ,
. N        .                                                      ~                              ,
   +    .
   +    .
          '
                                   ]                                                                  I
                                   ]                                                                  I
                                   -                                                                  I
                                   -                                                                  I I
                                                                                                      .
NATHAN        M. NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES                            1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING URBANA, ILLINOIS 61801 I
          .
I
* NATHAN        M. NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES                            1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING
                                                                                                      '
URBANA, ILLINOIS 61801 I
27 July 1971 f
27 July 1971 f
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FOR
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FOR THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATICN -- UNIT 1 METROPOLITAN-EDISON COMPANY AND JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY AEC Docket No. 50-289
                                                                                    '
THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATICN -- UNIT 1 METROPOLITAN-EDISON COMPANY AND JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY AEC Docket No. 50-289
                     ~
                     ~
by N. M. Newma rk a nd W. J. Ha l l After our review of the FSAR, including Amendments through No. 20, we believe that the design of the Three Mlle Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, can be considered adequate in terms of provision for safe shutdown for a Design Basis Earthquake of 0.12g maximum horizontal ground acceleration, and capable otherwise of withstanding the effects of an Operating Basis Earthquake of half this intensity.
by N. M. Newma rk a nd W. J. Ha l l After our review of the FSAR, including Amendments through No. 20, we believe that the design of the Three Mlle Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, can be considered adequate in terms of provision for safe shutdown for a Design Basis Earthquake of 0.12g maximum horizontal ground acceleration, and capable otherwise of withstanding the effects of an Operating Basis Earthquake of half this intensity.
Line 95: Line 67:
We believe the procedures used and the designs developed are in accord with the state of the art. We conclude that the design incorporates an acceptable range of margins of safety for the hazards considered.                      ,
We believe the procedures used and the designs developed are in accord with the state of the art. We conclude that the design incorporates an acceptable range of margins of safety for the hazards considered.                      ,
1589 180
1589 180
                                                                                  .
                                                                             .}}
                                                                             .}}

Latest revision as of 05:47, 2 February 2020

Forwards Hall & Newmark Final Rept on PSAR & Amends
ML19210A904
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/27/1971
From: Newmark N
NATHAN M. NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
To: Case E
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 7911010613
Download: ML19210A904 (3)


Text

DATE OF DOCUMENT: DATE RECENED NOJ athan M. Neumark .,- -t e J

... 7-27-71 7 '7-71 rhema, Illinois 618C - wa. = Eu o; aEroar; OrwEa:

x ORIGa CG; orM EJt 1 7 son G. Case AcnON Nacessaar O co~cuaaEacE O o*TE ^~swEaEc NO ACTION NECE$$ARY O co==E~T O er:

50-289 { Consultant File)

RtG. NO*

N;(Must Be Unclassaf ted) REFERRED TO DATE RECENED av OATE review of Fg&R including Andts D Lange 7 71 0 of Three Mila Island Unit 1 ishing Final Report om design Wh2cvsforACTIN ysis.....

Mam - omir C y *=g Files W. Prien & Suff Case /Esecary w w ./n,w w brig (W/ Orig & 1 e r (Ori g to be returned to 016) lp f I i' s .,

f ;, i'. Ii"l'.t n'. ,?,o.'.

it 1 ACKNOWLEDGED r .> J fod u.s. ATOMC ENERGY COMMISSION

  • MAllCONTROL FORM FOagEcp**s VERNMEN T PRIN TING OFFIC E 1970*406-979 _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ .

l l l\

J Uj O,#T 7911010 6/3 A

h

_NATHAN M. NEW. .RK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES 1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING URBANA. ILLINOIS 618ot 27 July 1971 v

ag

. y Mr. Edson G. Case, Director 'd ,w Division of Reactor Standards

' .kx - -

U.S. Atomic Energy Ccmmission Washington, D.C. 20545 N/h'

'QN M <V,$2 9 Fils Cy.

Regulatory

~

Re: Contract No. AT(49-5)-2667 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station -- Unit 1 Metropolitan-Edison Company and Jersey Central Power and Light Company AEC Docket No. 50-289

Dear Mr. Case:

Upon the conclusion of our review of the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report and Amendments for the Three Mile Is land Nuclea r Station -- Unit 1, Dr. W. J. Hall and I have prepared our final report, which is transmitted to you herewith.

Sincerely yours, f

} , $\ , L vh Mt N. M. Newmark P9 Enclosure cc: W. J. Hal 1 (2)

-Iy

& S Cocxtre jf Usuc 4

JUL291971 > ;

O REGULATCRY $ e-g cl# cia i539 Ima3

~ t-

=

1

. N . ~ ,

+ .

] I

- I I

NATHAN M. NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES 1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING URBANA, ILLINOIS 61801 I

27 July 1971 f

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FOR THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATICN -- UNIT 1 METROPOLITAN-EDISON COMPANY AND JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY AEC Docket No. 50-289

~

by N. M. Newma rk a nd W. J. Ha l l After our review of the FSAR, including Amendments through No. 20, we believe that the design of the Three Mlle Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, can be considered adequate in terms of provision for safe shutdown for a Design Basis Earthquake of 0.12g maximum horizontal ground acceleration, and capable otherwise of withstanding the effects of an Operating Basis Earthquake of half this intensity.

Our review was based on consideration, among other things, of the design criteria and results of analyses presented by the applicant for Reactor Internals, Reactor Buildings, Buried Piping, Other Nuclear Piping and Equipment, and Critical Items of Control and Instrumentation.

The Aircraf t Impact Design described by the applicant was also taken into account in our review.

We believe the procedures used and the designs developed are in accord with the state of the art. We conclude that the design incorporates an acceptable range of margins of safety for the hazards considered. ,

1589 180

.