ML19210B579

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Hall & Newmark 710303 Draft Commentary on FSAR for TMI-1
ML19210B579
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/03/1971
From: Hall W
NATHAN M. NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
To: Case E
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19210B580 List:
References
NUDOCS 7911110020
Download: ML19210B579 (2)


Text

P*}

D

b

' Y g D

,e s Ju w Ju

, S..k I!

^ ' ' " ' * * *

  • Esthan M. Eewmark F3-R 36 Urbana, Tninais 61801 LTR.

M EMO;

  • EPOR T; O T H ER:

i W. J. Em11 j

X O R6G.;

CG; OTHER:

1 signea a 8 conf'd j

J S

ACTION NECESSART O

co~cuaaE~cE O

o^rE ^~saEaEo:

NO ACTION NECESSARY O co==E~T O

av; iF; POST OFFaCE F ALE CODE; U

50-289

,,o s o.

RnP TION:(Must Be Unclassified)

REFERRED TO DATE RECEIVED gy DATE trans the following:

E. G. Case 3-8-71 W/2 cys for ACTION W/3ExtraCys s u a E5; DISTRTRUl' ION:

FI' Ccamentary on FSAR for Three-m % Regulatory File T Islani Sta. Unit No. 1 Dr. Morris (3)

B

\\'

l.'5 61 2 L} !.l L

- L.

cys ree'd)

-e-,-,

RRs;

'O O t fM I

U.S. ATOMC ENERGY COMMISSION M AIL CONTROL FORM roR AEc3 ss J.S. GO V E RNMEN T PRIN TIN G O F FIC E: 1970 382 145 1566 240 N911110 020

~

NATHAN M.

NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERvlCES 1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING URBANA. ILLINOIS 618o1 3 March 1971 Mr. Edson G. Case, D i rector Division of Reactor Standards pegulatory Fife Cy.

U.S. Atomic Energy Ccamission Washington, D.C.

20545 Re:

Contract No. AT(49-5)-2667 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station - Unit 1 Metropolitan-Edison Company and Jersey Central Power and Light Company AEC Docket No. 50-289

Dear Mr. Case:

D r. N. M. Newmark, D r. W. H. Wal ke r, and I have reviewed the Final Safety Analysis Report for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station - Unit 1.

In l ine wi th our development of a new approach to finalizing our review of the FSAR, we are attaching he rnwith a draf t of our commentary which, when i t i s comple ted, wil l fo rm the basis of our separate final FSAR report on this facility.

As you will note from the commentary the re are still a number of points to be clarified and we shall be pleased to discuss these wi th members of your staff as appropriate.

Sincerely yours,

[

W. J. Hal i P9 cc:

N. M. Newmark (2) 1566 241

~

W. J. Hall (2)

W. H. Wal ker (1)

@ l Ti ',

//

Q, niAgg u

b

/S77 - u:

m e

6 Ir k[A Ty

,C/

y]/

py j

^

aX

%W 1083 DU