ML19210A921: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:3.No.2 CATE RECEJVED
{{#Wiki_filter:3 No.2   ,
, DATE OF DOCUMENT:
CATE RECEJVED DATE OF DOCUMENT:
0+L 3***Fk lo.14-70 10-19-70*orNm T11 *is 618e1 r., , , ., , _,,o, X CC OTM EA.Q R sG.;7 DATE ANSWERED:. .ACTION NECESSARY C CONCURRENCE NO ACTION NECE$$ARY O co==ENT O av: P'LE Coot POST OF F 6CE 50-289 REFERRED TO DATE RECENED gy DATE REo. No.Se Unciassified) ing Report on Inspection E. Case 1o-15 70-70 to the Three Mile y/2 cys for Action ear Station Mo.
0+   L
1.......**
* 3***Fk                                 lo.14-70               10-19-70                 orNm
W/2ExtraCys DISTRinuriON:
                                                                        ,,o, T11 *is 618e1                 r.   ,,,.               , , _
m,= -se Rean1 stur , File p Morris (2) 0,N,sOi,.F_f.l!.0V
X                               OTM EA.
.7 m ,,- J'fI , fod gned cy ree'd.
Q R sG.;           CC 7
Ov -u.s. Arouc ENEnor couusssic" MAIL CONTROL FORM roau AEc.szes
      . .                                                                            DATE ANSWERED:
< e-son MENT PRINTING OP PIC E: 1970 3e2148
ACTION NECESSARY   C   CONCURRENCE O    av:
-m ,/,di 1Jd 911010 63 2 g
NO ACTION NECE$$ARY O   co==ENT POST OF F 6CE P'LE Coot REo. No.
T s s'N A T H A N M. N E W P RK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES 1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING URBANA. ILLINOIS 618ol 14 October 1970 y [/Regulatory File Cy.Trip Reoort:
50-289                   RECENED gy            DATE REFERRED TO         DATE Se Unciassified) ing Report on Inspection                       E. Case               1o-15 70 y/2 cys for Action
p@I Site: 3-Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit I Metropolitan-Edison Company g Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Ogergg Date of Visit:
  -70 to the Three Mile ear Station Mo. 1.......**                     W/2ExtraCys DISTRinuriON:
7 October 1970 t OCT] 91970 6.To Attendees: AEC p,k T{4/ Q ocCKE[ ctg [3 D. F. Ross -- DRL s f D. M. Hunnicutt -- Compiiance 7/R. Brown -- Compilance 43g p AEC Consultants N . M. Newma r k -- Newma rk & As soc i a te s W. J. Hall -- Newmark & Associates Gilbert Associates, Inc.
m,= -se Rean1 stur , File p                   Morris (2) m 0,N,sOi,.F_f.l!.0V 7            .
H. Lorenz D. Croneberger
                                                                            - J fI gned cy ree'd.                                                                       Ov -               fod u.s. Arouc ENEnor couusssic"           MAIL CONTROL FORM roau AEc.szes
, C. Chen L. Patterson Metropolitan-Edison Comoany R. M. Kiingaman J. L. C. Bachofer, Jr.
                                                                                                    < e-son MENT PRINTING OP PIC E: 1970 3e2148 m
1Jd  ,/ ,di 911010 63 2     g
 
T s   s N A T H A N M. N E W P         RK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES                                 1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING URBANA. ILLINOIS 618ol 14 October 1970                           y [/
Regulatory       File Cy.
Trip Reoort:
Site: 3-Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit I                                  p@I Metropolitan-Edison Company                                       g Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Ogergg Date of Visit:     7 October 1970                                       t Attendees: AEC                                                              OCT] 91970.To6 T{4 / Q p,k D. F. Ross -- DRL                                           f  ocCKE[ ctg [3 s D. M. Hunnicutt -- Compiiance                                                 7/
R. Brown -- Compilance 43g p AEC Consultants N . M. Newma r k -- Newma rk & As soc i a te s W. J. Hall -- Newmark & Associates Gilbert Associates, Inc.
H. Lorenz D. Croneberger                             ,
C. Chen L. Patterson Metropolitan-Edison Comoany R. M. Kiingaman J. L. C. Bachofer, Jr.
D. H. Reppert The morning was devoted to an inspection tour of the facility. Those principal items examined included the containment structure, auxiliary and tur-bine building, and the pump house. Also examined were such items as piping, equipment mounting, tendon gallery, cable trays, etc.
D. H. Reppert The morning was devoted to an inspection tour of the facility. Those principal items examined included the containment structure, auxiliary and tur-bine building, and the pump house. Also examined were such items as piping, equipment mounting, tendon gallery, cable trays, etc.
In the af ternoon a technical meeting was held in which the following items were discussed: (a)Clarification was provided to Gilbert Associates personnel re-garding several statements made in a report to AEC Regulatory Staff, " Adequacy of the Structural Criteria for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1" by N. M. Newmark and W. J. Hall, dated December 1967.(b)Most of the time was spent in reviewing in detail the questions of seismic concern contained in the list of questions dated 16 September 1970, as transmi tted f rom Dr. Peter A. Morris, Director of Division of Reactor Licens-
In the af ternoon a technical meeting was held in which the following items were discussed:
_' 0_6 /Q.
(a)   Clarification was provided to Gilbert Associates personnel re-garding several statements made in a report to AEC Regulatory Staff, " Adequacy of the Structural Criteria for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1" by N. M. Newmark and W. J. Hall, dated December 1967.
s- %.---2 Ing, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, to the Metropolitan-Edison Company, Attention:
(b) Most of the time was spent in reviewing in detail the questions of seismic concern contained in the list of questions dated 16 September 1970, as transmi tted f rom Dr. Peter A. Morris, Director of Division of Reactor Licens-Q. 0_6 /
Mr. J. G. Miller. As a result of this review of the questions and status of the analyses and design, it was believed that the final answers to these questions will be simplified, yet at the same time contain consid-erably more information of engineering significance than would otherwise have been the case.
 
s 2
Ing, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, to the Metropolitan-Edison Company, Attention: Mr. J. G. Miller. As a result of this review of the questions and status of the analyses and design, it was believed that the final answers to these questions will be simplified, yet at the same time contain consid-erably more information of engineering significance than would otherwise have been the case.
Drs. Newmark and Hall will undertake review of the Gilb,rt Associates, Inc. topical report on pip!ng in conjunction with the procedures of Biggs and Roesset, as applicable, by the time the answers to the questions are submitted in order to provide a basis for evaluation of the piping design. We shall also review requests BAW-10000 Part I and Part 2 dealing with Reactor Internals and Fuel Assembly Analyses. Comments on these reviews will be transmitted to DRS/DRL AEC in the near future if it appears necessary.
Drs. Newmark and Hall will undertake review of the Gilb,rt Associates, Inc. topical report on pip!ng in conjunction with the procedures of Biggs and Roesset, as applicable, by the time the answers to the questions are submitted in order to provide a basis for evaluation of the piping design. We shall also review requests BAW-10000 Part I and Part 2 dealing with Reactor Internals and Fuel Assembly Analyses. Comments on these reviews will be transmitted to DRS/DRL AEC in the near future if it appears necessary.
In studying the "aircraf t hardening" that has gone into the design, and as a result of the inspection of the facility, it would be helpful if the project s taf f could obtain additional information about the properties of the packing materials placed between the edges of the Control Room floor and the walls, and its expected behavior under seismic response in terms of shielding the floor from high-intensity seismic motions.
In studying the "aircraf t hardening" that has gone into the design, and as a result of the inspection of the facility, it would be helpful if the project s taf f could obtain additional information about the properties of the packing materials placed between the edges of the Control Room floor and the walls, and its expected behavior under seismic response in terms of shielding the floor from high-intensity seismic motions.
The air coolers were noted to be items of significance from a seismic design standpoint and it is assumed that additional information on this aspect of the design will be transmitted to us in the near future by DRS., & G M 0AJ N. M. Newmark cic cc: W. J. Hall lbb).}}
The air coolers were noted to be items of significance from a seismic design standpoint and it is assumed that additional information on this aspect of the design will be transmitted to us in the near future by DRS.
                                                            , & G M 0AJ N. M. Newmark cic cc:   W. J. Hall lbb)
  .}}

Latest revision as of 05:47, 2 February 2020

Repts on 701007 Trip to Facility.Requests Addl Info Re Properties of Packing Matl Between Edges of Control Room Floor & Walls & Expected Behavior Seismic Response in Terms of Shielding Floor from high-intensity Seismic Motion
ML19210A921
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/14/1970
From: Newmark N
NATHAN M. NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
To: Case E
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 7911010632
Download: ML19210A921 (3)
v • d • e


Text

3 No.2 ,

CATE RECEJVED DATE OF DOCUMENT:

0+ L

  • 3***Fk lo.14-70 10-19-70 orNm

,,o, T11 *is 618e1 r. ,,,. , , _

X OTM EA.

Q R sG.; CC 7

. . DATE ANSWERED:

ACTION NECESSARY C CONCURRENCE O av:

NO ACTION NECE$$ARY O co==ENT POST OF F 6CE P'LE Coot REo. No.

50-289 RECENED gy DATE REFERRED TO DATE Se Unciassified) ing Report on Inspection E. Case 1o-15 70 y/2 cys for Action

-70 to the Three Mile ear Station Mo. 1.......** W/2ExtraCys DISTRinuriON:

m,= -se Rean1 stur , File p Morris (2) m 0,N,sOi,.F_f.l!.0V 7 .

- J fI gned cy ree'd. Ov - fod u.s. Arouc ENEnor couusssic" MAIL CONTROL FORM roau AEc.szes

< e-son MENT PRINTING OP PIC E: 1970 3e2148 m

1Jd ,/ ,di 911010 63 2 g

T s s N A T H A N M. N E W P RK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES 1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING URBANA. ILLINOIS 618ol 14 October 1970 y [/

Regulatory File Cy.

Trip Reoort:

Site: 3-Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit I p@I Metropolitan-Edison Company g Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Ogergg Date of Visit: 7 October 1970 t Attendees: AEC OCT] 91970.To6 T{4 / Q p,k D. F. Ross -- DRL f ocCKE[ ctg [3 s D. M. Hunnicutt -- Compiiance 7/

R. Brown -- Compilance 43g p AEC Consultants N . M. Newma r k -- Newma rk & As soc i a te s W. J. Hall -- Newmark & Associates Gilbert Associates, Inc.

H. Lorenz D. Croneberger ,

C. Chen L. Patterson Metropolitan-Edison Comoany R. M. Kiingaman J. L. C. Bachofer, Jr.

D. H. Reppert The morning was devoted to an inspection tour of the facility. Those principal items examined included the containment structure, auxiliary and tur-bine building, and the pump house. Also examined were such items as piping, equipment mounting, tendon gallery, cable trays, etc.

In the af ternoon a technical meeting was held in which the following items were discussed:

(a) Clarification was provided to Gilbert Associates personnel re-garding several statements made in a report to AEC Regulatory Staff, " Adequacy of the Structural Criteria for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1" by N. M. Newmark and W. J. Hall, dated December 1967.

(b) Most of the time was spent in reviewing in detail the questions of seismic concern contained in the list of questions dated 16 September 1970, as transmi tted f rom Dr. Peter A. Morris, Director of Division of Reactor Licens-Q. 0_6 /

s 2

Ing, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, to the Metropolitan-Edison Company, Attention: Mr. J. G. Miller. As a result of this review of the questions and status of the analyses and design, it was believed that the final answers to these questions will be simplified, yet at the same time contain consid-erably more information of engineering significance than would otherwise have been the case.

Drs. Newmark and Hall will undertake review of the Gilb,rt Associates, Inc. topical report on pip!ng in conjunction with the procedures of Biggs and Roesset, as applicable, by the time the answers to the questions are submitted in order to provide a basis for evaluation of the piping design. We shall also review requests BAW-10000 Part I and Part 2 dealing with Reactor Internals and Fuel Assembly Analyses. Comments on these reviews will be transmitted to DRS/DRL AEC in the near future if it appears necessary.

In studying the "aircraf t hardening" that has gone into the design, and as a result of the inspection of the facility, it would be helpful if the project s taf f could obtain additional information about the properties of the packing materials placed between the edges of the Control Room floor and the walls, and its expected behavior under seismic response in terms of shielding the floor from high-intensity seismic motions.

The air coolers were noted to be items of significance from a seismic design standpoint and it is assumed that additional information on this aspect of the design will be transmitted to us in the near future by DRS.

, & G M 0AJ N. M. Newmark cic cc: W. J. Hall lbb)

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19210A921&oldid=2390725"