IR 05000348/2012002: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 28: Line 28:


==Dear Mr. Lynch:==
==Dear Mr. Lynch:==
On March 31, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on April 12, 2012, with you and members of your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The NRC reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities and interviewed personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC public document room or from the publicly available records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the public electronic reading room).
On March 31, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on April 12, 2012, with you and members of your staff.
 
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The NRC reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities and interviewed personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified.
 
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC public document room or from the publicly available records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the public electronic reading room).


Sincerely,/RA/ Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Docket No.: 50-348, 50-364, 72-042 License No.: NPF-2, NPF-8  
Sincerely,/RA/ Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Docket No.: 50-348, 50-364, 72-042 License No.: NPF-2, NPF-8  


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
(See next page)
(See next page)  
April 30, 2012 Mr. Tom
 
__ ML12122A814 ________
G SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE G FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP RIII:DRP RII:DRP RII:DRS NSIR NSIR SIGNATURE /RA By FEhrhardt/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA By E-mail/0 /RA By E_mail/ /RA By-e-mail/ /RA By-e-mail/ NAME MMiller TLighty FEhrhardt ECrowe JSowe RCarrion JLanghlin DATE 4/27/2012 4/27/2012 4/27/2012 4/23/2012 4/23/2012 4/23/2012 4/23/2012 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO SNC 2
 
===Enclosure:===
Inspection Report 05000348/2012002; 05000364/2012002; and 07200042/2012001
 
===w/Attachment:===
Supplemental Information
 
cc w/encl: S. Kuczynski Chairman, President and CEO Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution
 
J. L. Pemberton SVP & General Counsel-Ops & SNC Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution D. G. Bost Chief Nuclear Officer Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution Paula Marino Vice President Engineering Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution
 
M. J. Ajluni Nuclear Licensing Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution
 
Mark Williams Commissioner Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution
 
B. D. McKinney, Jr. Regulatory Response Manager Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution D. W. Daughhetee Licensing Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution
 
T. D. Honeycutt Regulatory Response Supervisor Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution Bradley J. Adams Vice President Fleet Operations Support Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution N. J. Stringfellow Licensing Manager Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution L. P. Hill Licensing Supervisor Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution L. L. Crumpton Administrative Assistant, Sr. Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution William D. Oldfield Principal Licensing Engineer Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Electronic Mail Distribution (cc w/encl cont'd - See next page)
 
SNC 3 cc w/encl cont'd: Todd L. Youngblood Plant Manager Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Electronic Mail Distribution John G. Horn Site Support Manager Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant U.S. NRC P. O. Box 620 Ashford, AL 36312 Cynthia A. Sanders Radioactive Materials Program Manager Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution James C. Hardeman Environmental Radiation Program Manager Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution Mr. Mark Culver Chairman Houston County Commission P. O. Box 6406 Dothan, AL 36302
 
James L. McNees, CHP Director Office of Radiation Control Alabama Dept. of Public Health P. O. Box 303017 Montgomery, AL 36130-3017
 
Donald E. Williamson State Health Officer Alabama Dept. of Public Health RSA Tower - Administration Suite 1552 P.O. Box 30317 Montgomery, AL 36130-3017 Chuck Mueller Manager Policy and Radiation Program Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution SNC 4 Letter to Tom from Frank Ehrhardt dated April 30, 2012.
 
SUBJECT: JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000348/2012002; 05000364/2012002; AND 07200042/2012001 Distribution w/encl
: C. Evans, RII L. Douglas, RII OE Mail RIDSNRRDIRS PUBLIC RidsNrrPMFarley Resource
 
Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II
 
Docket Nos.: 05000348, 05000364, 07200042 07200042/2012001 License Nos.: NPF-2, NPF-8
 
Report No.: 05000348/2012002; 05000364/2012002; and 07200042/2012001 Licensee: Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
 
Facility: Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Location: Columbia, AL
 
Dates: January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012
 
Inspectors: E. Crowe, Senior Resident Inspector J. Sowa, Resident Inspector R. Carrion, Senior Reactor Inspector (Section 4OA5) J. Laughlin, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, (Section 1EP4)
 
Approved by: Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Enclosure


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
Line 42: Line 89:


===A. NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings===
===A. NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings===
No findings were identified. B. Licensee-identified Violations None
 
No findings were identified.
 
B. Licensee-identified Violations None


=REPORT DETAILS=
=REPORT DETAILS=
Summary of Plant Status Unit 1 was at 100% rated thermal power (RTP) at the start of this report period. The licensee shut down Unit 1 on January 17 to install monitoring equipment on the main turbine. The license restarted Unit 1 on January 20 and achieved 100% RTP on January 23. The unit remained at or near 100% RTP until the licensee started a reactor coolant system temperature coast down on March 12 for the next refueling outage. Unit 1 remained in this mode of operation until the end of the inspection period. Unit 1 was at 78% RTP and coasting down for a refueling outage at the end of this inspection period.
 
===Summary of Plant Status===
 
Unit 1 was at 100% rated thermal power (RTP) at the start of this report period. The licensee shut down Unit 1 on January 17 to install monitoring equipment on the main turbine. The license restarted Unit 1 on January 20 and achieved 100% RTP on January 23. The unit remained at or near 100% RTP until the licensee started a reactor coolant system temperature coast down on March 12 for the next refueling outage. Unit 1 remained in this mode of operation until the end of the inspection period. Unit 1 was at 78% RTP and coasting down for a refueling outage at the end of this inspection period.


Unit 2 was at 100% RTP at the start of this report period. Unit 2 remained at or near 100% RTP for the remainder of the inspection period.
Unit 2 was at 100% RTP at the start of this report period. Unit 2 remained at or near 100% RTP for the remainder of the inspection period.
Line 56: Line 109:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Seasonal Readiness Review:  The inspectors evaluated implementation of the licensee's cold weather contingency procedure, FNP-0-SOP-0.12, and conditions for entry into the procedure. The inspectors examined heat tracing lines on the condensate storage tanks and refueling water storage tanks to verify these protections for cold weather conditions were functional. The emergency diesel generator building and service water intake structure were also evaluated to ensure provisions were implemented to compensate for any known deficiencies. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment. Impending Adverse Conditions:  The inspectors evaluated implementation of adverse weather preparation procedures and compensatory measures for the following adverse weather condition. The inspectors walked-down portions of the main steam systems, condensate storage systems, refueling water storage tanks, and emergency diesel generators. These systems were selected because their safety-related functions could be affected by freezing weather. The inspectors verified the applicable portions of procedure FNP-0-AOP-21.0, "Severe Weather," were performed. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
Seasonal Readiness Review:  The inspectors evaluated implementation of the licensee's cold weather contingency procedure, FNP-0-SOP-0.12, and conditions for entry into the procedure. The inspectors examined heat tracing lines on the condensate storage tanks and refueling water storage tanks to verify these protections for cold weather conditions were functional. The emergency diesel generator building and service water intake structure were also evaluated to ensure provisions were implemented to compensate for any known deficiencies. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.
* Projected freezing temperatures for January 4, 2012 External Flooding:  The inspectors reviewed the Final Safety Analysis Report and site design documents related to the probable mean precipitation event and potential upstream flooding concerns. The inspectors performed a walk-down of the site topography to ensure no changes had occurred that could adversely affect site design criteria. The inspection included tanks, outside doors and thresholds, and underground vault openings to outside areas to ensure design measures were in place to mitigate potential external flooding concerns. The inspectors determined that openings in risk significant structures, systems, and components were above projected flood levels. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.
 
Impending Adverse Conditions:  The inspectors evaluated implementation of adverse weather preparation procedures and compensatory measures for the following adverse weather condition. The inspectors walked-down portions of the main steam systems, condensate storage systems, refueling water storage tanks, and emergency diesel generators. These systems were selected because their safety-related functions could be affected by freezing weather. The inspectors verified the applicable portions of procedure FNP-0-AOP-21.0, "Severe Weather," were performed. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
* Projected freezing temperatures for January 4, 2012 External Flooding:  The inspectors reviewed the Final Safety Analysis Report and site design documents related to the probable mean precipitation event and potential upstream flooding concerns. The inspectors performed a walk-down of the site topography to ensure no changes had occurred that could adversely affect site design criteria. The inspection included tanks, outside doors and thresholds, and underground vault openings to outside areas to ensure design measures were in place to mitigate potential external flooding concerns. The inspectors determined that openings in risk significant structures, systems, and components were above projected flood levels. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 89: Line 144:
==1R06 Flood Protection Measures==
==1R06 Flood Protection Measures==


===.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review:===
===.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review===
:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Line 98: Line 154:
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.


===.2 Annual Review of Cables Located in Underground Bunkers/Manholes:===
===.2 Annual Review of Cables Located in Underground Bunkers/Manholes===
:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Line 124: Line 181:
* Documentation of activities, including initials and sign-offs in procedures, control room logs, technical specification (TS) entry and exit, and service logs entries
* Documentation of activities, including initials and sign-offs in procedures, control room logs, technical specification (TS) entry and exit, and service logs entries
* Management and supervision of activities, including risk management and reactivity management
* Management and supervision of activities, including risk management and reactivity management
* Pre-job briefs   Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.
* Pre-job briefs Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 132: Line 189:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Resident Inspector Quarterly Inspection Samples:  The inspectors reviewed the following two condition reports:
Resident Inspector Quarterly Inspection Samples
:  The inspectors reviewed the following two condition reports:
* CR 394283, Partial loss of Unit 1 annunciators during maintenance to annunciator power supply for panel B and panel C
* CR 394283, Partial loss of Unit 1 annunciators during maintenance to annunciator power supply for panel B and panel C
* CR 401257, Unit 1 refueling water storage tank level instrument (LT502) found out of tolerance low The inspectors reviewed the condition reports for the following attributes:
* CR 401257, Unit 1 refueling water storage tank level instrument (LT502) found out of tolerance low The inspectors reviewed the condition reports for the following attributes:
* Appropriate work practices
* Appropriate work practices
* Identifying and addressing common cause failures
* Identifying and addressing common cause failures
Line 202: Line 260:
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the following five tests and either observed the test or reviewed test results to verify testing adequately demonstrated equipment operability and met technical specification (TS) requirements. The inspectors reviewed the activities to assess for preconditioning of equipment, procedure adherence, and valve alignment following completion of the surveillance. The inspectors reviewed licensee procedures FNP-0-AP-24, "Test Control," FNP-0-M-050, "Master List of Surveillance Requirements,"
The inspectors reviewed the following five tests and either observed the test or reviewed test results to verify testing adequately demonstrated equipment operability and met technical specification (TS) requirements. The inspectors reviewed the activities to assess for preconditioning of equipment, procedure adherence, and valve alignment following completion of the surveillance. The inspectors reviewed licensee procedures FNP-0-AP-24, "Test Control," FNP-0-M-050, "Master List of Surveillance Requirements,"
and NMP-OS-007, "Conduct of Operations," and attended selected briefings to determine if procedure requirements were met. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment. Surveillance Tests
and NMP-OS-007, "Conduct of Operations," and attended selected briefings to determine if procedure requirements were met. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.
 
Surveillance Tests
* FNP-1-STP-16.12A, 1A Containment Spray Pump Automatic Starting Circuitry Test
* FNP-1-STP-16.12A, 1A Containment Spray Pump Automatic Starting Circuitry Test
* FNP-1-STP-22.2, 1B Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Quarterly Inservice Test
* FNP-1-STP-22.2, 1B Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Quarterly Inservice Test
* FNP-2-STP-10.3, Emergency Core Cooling Valves Inservice Test and PORV Block Valve Stroke Test
* FNP-2-STP-10.3, Emergency Core Cooling Valves Inservice Test and PORV Block Valve Stroke Test
* FNP-2-STP-33.2B, Reactor Trip Breaker Train B Operability Test In-Service Test (IST)
* FNP-2-STP-33.2B, Reactor Trip Breaker Train B Operability Test In-Service Test (IST)
* FNP-2-STP-22.16, Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Quarterly Inservice Test"
* FNP-2-STP-22.16, Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Quarterly Inservice Test"


Line 213: Line 273:


===Cornerstone:===
===Cornerstone:===
Emergency Preparedness (EP) 1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes
Emergency Preparedness (EP)1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Line 221: Line 281:


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified. 1EP6  Drill Evaluation
No findings were identified.
 
1EP6  Drill Evaluation


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Line 235: Line 297:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled licensee data for the three performance indicators (PIs) listed below to verify the accuracy of the PI data reported. Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Indicator Guideline," Rev. 6, was used to verify the basis in reporting for each data element. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment. Cornerstone: Initiating Events
The inspectors sampled licensee data for the three performance indicators (PIs) listed below to verify the accuracy of the PI data reported. Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Indicator Guideline," Rev. 6, was used to verify the basis in reporting for each data element. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.
 
===Cornerstone:===
Initiating Events
* Unplanned Scrams
* Unplanned Scrams
* Unplanned Power Changes Cornerstone: Mitigating Systems
* Unplanned Power Changes  
 
===Cornerstone:===
Mitigating Systems
* Emergency AC Power System
* Emergency AC Power System


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.  
No findings were identified.
 
{{a|4OA2}}
{{a|4OA2}}
==4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems==
==4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems==


===.1 Daily Condition Report (CR) Reviews===
===.1 Daily Condition Report (CR) Reviews===
As required by IP 71152, "Identification and Resolution of Problems," and in order to identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance issues for follow-up, the NRC performed a daily screening of items entered into the licensee's corrective action program (CAP). This review was accomplished by reviewing copies of CRs, attending daily screening meetings, and accessing the licensee's computerized database.
As required by IP 71152, "Identification and Resolution of Problems," and in order to identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance issues for follow-up, the NRC performed a daily screening of items entered into the licensee's corrective action program (CAP). This review was accomplished by reviewing copies of CRs, attending daily screening meetings, and accessing the licensee's computerized database.


Line 260: Line 330:
* Identification of root and contributing causes of the problem
* Identification of root and contributing causes of the problem
* Identification of CRs
* Identification of CRs
* Completion of corrective actions in a timely manner   b. Observations:  CR 361386:  The licensee conducted a routine surveillance of the B2G sequencer on October 15, 2011. The surveillance tested the functionality of the sequencer to auto-start various components in response to a safety injection (SI) actuation concurrent with a loss of off-site power (LOSP). Step 5 of the sequencer failed to actuate and the 2B hydrogen cavity dilution fan and the 2B motor driven auxiliary feedwater (MDAFW) pump did not auto-start as expected. The licensee conducted troubleshooting of the circuit and the HFA style relay which failed to actuate during step 5 of the sequencer test. The licensee's internal testing did not find a fault with the circuit or the relay. The licensee conservatively replaced the relay and successfully completed the surveillance to demonstrate operability of the B2G sequencer.
* Completion of corrective actions in a timely manner b. Observations
:  CR 361386:  The licensee conducted a routine surveillance of the B2G sequencer on October 15, 2011. The surveillance tested the functionality of the sequencer to auto-start various components in response to a safety injection (SI) actuation concurrent with a loss of off-site power (LOSP). Step 5 of the sequencer failed to actuate and the 2B hydrogen cavity dilution fan and the 2B motor driven auxiliary feedwater (MDAFW) pump did not auto-start as expected. The licensee conducted troubleshooting of the circuit and the HFA style relay which failed to actuate during step 5 of the sequencer test. The licensee's internal testing did not find a fault with the circuit or the relay. The licensee conservatively replaced the relay and successfully completed the surveillance to demonstrate operability of the B2G sequencer.


The inspectors reviewed the surveillance test procedures during which step 5 failed to auto-start the 2B MDAFWP as well as the successful surveillance following the installation of a new HFA style relay (FNP-2-STP-40.0). The inspectors also interviewed station personnel to understand the depth of troubleshooting and the apparent cause of the failure. Inspectors reviewed the ESS/LOSP sequencer schematics (drawing 207646) as well as work orders that detailed troubleshooting of the relay and subsequent installation of a new relay (SNC work orders 77088, 340011, 339687, and 340647). The inspectors did not identify any operability concerns with station equipment.
The inspectors reviewed the surveillance test procedures during which step 5 failed to auto-start the 2B MDAFWP as well as the successful surveillance following the installation of a new HFA style relay (FNP-2-STP-40.0). The inspectors also interviewed station personnel to understand the depth of troubleshooting and the apparent cause of the failure. Inspectors reviewed the ESS/LOSP sequencer schematics (drawing 207646) as well as work orders that detailed troubleshooting of the relay and subsequent installation of a new relay (SNC work orders 77088, 340011, 339687, and 340647). The inspectors did not identify any operability concerns with station equipment.
Line 276: Line 347:


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
:  No findings were identified.  
:  No findings were identified.
 
{{a|4OA3}}
{{a|4OA3}}
==4OA3 Event Follow-up==
==4OA3 Event Follow-up==
   (Closed) LER 05000364/2011-001-00 Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Inoperable
   (Closed) LER 05000364/2011-001-00 Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Inoperable


Line 286: Line 359:
====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified. The inspectors determined the time limits of TS 3.7.5, Condition C had been exceeded but did not identify a performance deficiency because the condition was not reasonably within the licensee's ability to foresee and correct, and therefore could not have been prevented. Integrated Inspection Report 05000348/2011005 and 05000364/2011005; and 05000364/2011014, issued January 27, 2012,  documented a Green, self-revealing NCV (05000364/20110014-01) of 10CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, Design Control, for the licensee's failure to correctly update their design drawing for the Unit 2 TDAFW pump electrical controls. The inspectors determined the licensee's failure to correctly update their design drawing for the Unit 2 TDAFW pump electrical controls caused TS 3.7.5, Condition C to be exceeded. This LER is closed.
No findings were identified. The inspectors determined the time limits of TS 3.7.5, Condition C had been exceeded but did not identify a performance deficiency because the condition was not reasonably within the licensee's ability to foresee and correct, and therefore could not have been prevented. Integrated Inspection Report 05000348/2011005 and 05000364/2011005; and 05000364/2011014, issued January 27, 2012,  documented a Green, self-revealing NCV (05000364/20110014-01) of 10CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, Design Control, for the licensee's failure to correctly update their design drawing for the Unit 2 TDAFW pump electrical controls. The inspectors determined the licensee's failure to correctly update their design drawing for the Unit 2 TDAFW pump electrical controls caused TS 3.7.5, Condition C to be exceeded. This LER is closed.
{{a|4OA5}}
{{a|4OA5}}
==4OA5 Other Activities   On-Site Fabrication of Components and Construction of an ISFSI==
==4OA5 Other Activities==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 60853}}
 
On-Site Fabrication of Components and Construction of an ISFSI (60853)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Line 298: Line 373:
{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit==
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit==
The NRC presented the inspection results to you and members of your staff on April 12, 2012. The staff acknowledged the results. The NRC confirmed proprietary information was not provided or examined during the inspection.
The NRC presented the inspection results to you and members of your staff on April 12, 2012. The staff acknowledged the results. The NRC confirmed proprietary information was not provided or examined during the inspection.


{{a|4OA7}}
{{a|4OA7}}
==4OA7 Licensee-Identified Violations==
==4OA7 Licensee-Identified Violations==
None ATTACHMENT:   
None ATTACHMENT:   


Line 322: Line 399:
: [[contact::R. Tyler]], Special Projects ISFSI Engineer  
: [[contact::R. Tyler]], Special Projects ISFSI Engineer  
: [[contact::S. Varnum]], Chemistry Manager  
: [[contact::S. Varnum]], Chemistry Manager  
: [[contact::C. Westberry]], Engineering Systems Manager
: [[contact::C. Westberry]], Engineering Systems Manager  
 
===NRC personnel===
===NRC personnel===
Frank Ehrhardt, Chief, Branch 2, Division of Reactor Projects  
Frank Ehrhardt, Chief, Branch 2, Division of Reactor Projects  
: [[contact::E. Crowe]], Senior Resident Inspector
: [[contact::E. Crowe]], Senior Resident Inspector  
 
==LIST OF REPORT ITEMS==
==LIST OF REPORT ITEMS==


Line 331: Line 410:
None     
None     
===Opened and Closed===
===Opened and Closed===
None   
None   
===Closed===
===Closed===
: [[Closes LER::05000364/LER-2011-001]]-00 LER Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Inoperable (Section 4OA3)  
: [[Closes LER::05000364/LER-2011-001]]-00 LER Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Inoperable (Section 4OA3)  
===Discussed===
===Discussed===
None
None
Line 339: Line 420:
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection==
==Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection==
: Condition Reports: 23088, 52158, 58947, 69298, 69483, 69590, 69651, 69836, 69837,
: Condition Reports:
: 23088, 52158, 58947, 69298, 69483, 69590, 69651, 69836, 69837,
: 338249,
: 338249,
: 405969,
: 405969,
: 423770,
: 423770,
: 2011104097,
: 2011104097,
: 2011104389
: 2011104389  
: Documents: FAX19-1 Book S28 Calculations, Grading and Drainage Intercompany memorandum dated January 10, 1990, Generic Letter 89-22 - Latest Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Criteria (ENG-90-121) MDC S080535201
: Documents:
: FAX19-1 Book S28 Calculations, Grading and Drainage Intercompany memorandum dated January 10, 1990, Generic Letter 89-22 - Latest Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Criteria (ENG-90-121) MDC S080535201  
: Procedures:
: Procedures:
: FNP-0-GMP-84.0, Installation of Plastic Sheeting Over Main Steam Valve Room Grating, Version 8.0
: FNP-0-GMP-84.0, Installation of Plastic Sheeting Over Main Steam Valve Room Grating, Version 8.0
Line 352: Line 435:
: FNP-1-EMP-1383.01, Freeze Protection Inspections, Version 19.0
: FNP-1-EMP-1383.01, Freeze Protection Inspections, Version 19.0
: FNP-2-EMP-1383.01, Freeze Protection Inspections, Version 16.0  
: FNP-2-EMP-1383.01, Freeze Protection Inspections, Version 16.0  
: Work Orders: SNC52151, SNC55208, SNC70632, SNC86139, SNC93995, SNC96682, SNC319543, SNC378308
: Work Orders:
: SNC52151, SNC55208, SNC70632, SNC86139, SNC93995, SNC96682, SNC319543, SNC378308


==Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment==
==Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment==
: Condition Reports: 27619, 33527, 34650, 62959,
: Condition Reports:
: 27619, 33527, 34650, 62959,
: 396911, Drawings: D170119, Sheet 1, Version 3.0 D175007, Sheet 1, Version 31.0 D175038, Sheet 3, Version 26.0 D205038, Sheet 2, Version 23.0  
: 396911, Drawings: D170119, Sheet 1, Version 3.0 D175007, Sheet 1, Version 31.0 D175038, Sheet 3, Version 26.0 D205038, Sheet 2, Version 23.0  
: Procedures:
: Procedures:
Line 374: Line 459:


==Section 1R06: Flood Protection Measures==
==Section 1R06: Flood Protection Measures==
: Documents: Calculation
: Documents:
: BM-999-1932-001, Internal Flooding Assessment UFSAR, Section 3.4 Water Level (Flood) Design Procedures:
: Calculation
: FNP-0-GMP-60.1, General Inspection Outdoor Electrical Duct Run Pull Boxes, Version 7.0
: BM-999-1932-001, Internal Flooding Assessment UFSAR, Section 3.4 Water Level (Flood) Design  
: Work Orders: SNC299093
: Procedures:
: FNP-0-GMP-60.1, General Inspection Outdoor Electrical Duct Run Pull Boxes, Version 7.0  
: Work Orders:
: SNC299093


==Section 1R11: Licensed Operator Requalification Program==
==Section 1R11: Licensed Operator Requalification Program==
: Documents: Licensed Operator Continuing Training Simulator Exercise Guide:
: Documents:
: Licensed Operator Continuing Training Simulator Exercise Guide:
: LOCT 10-12 Segment 11, 12-S1103
: LOCT 10-12 Segment 11, 12-S1103


Line 389: Line 478:
: 394396,
: 394396,
: 401257,
: 401257,
: 404351
: 404351  
: Work Orders: SNC57971, SNC359421, SNC361654, SNC365832
: Work Orders:
: SNC57971, SNC359421, SNC361654, SNC365832


==Section 1R13: Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Evaluation==
==Section 1R13: Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Evaluation==
: Procedures:
 
: FNP-0-ACP-52.3, "Mode 1,2, & 3 Risk Assessment," Version 9.0  
===Procedures===
:
: FNP-0-ACP-52.3, "Mode 1,2, & 3 Risk Assessment," Version 9.0
: Attachment
: Attachment


==Section 1R15: Operability Determinations==
==Section 1R15: Operability Determinations==
: Condition Reports:
: Condition Reports:
: 322903,
: 2903,
: 389135,
: 389135,
: 394663,
: 394663,
Line 409: Line 501:
: 414207,
: 414207,
: 420129  
: 420129  
: Documents: Immediate determination of operability for Unit 2 TDAFWP oil sample water content
: Documents:
: Drawings: D-177185, Sheet 1, version 18.0 D-181707, Sheet 1, version 1.0
: Immediate determination of operability for Unit 2 TDAFWP oil sample water content Drawings: D-177185, Sheet 1, version 18.0 D-181707, Sheet 1, version 1.0  
: Procedures:
: Procedures:
: FNP-1-ARP-1.12, Seismic Panel Alarm Response Procedure, Version 59.1
: FNP-1-ARP-1.12, Seismic Panel Alarm Response Procedure, Version 59.1
: Technical Evaluations:
: Technical Evaluations:
: 313079,
: 313079,
: 316204,
: 316204,
: 322999
: 322999  
: Work Orders: SNC361836, SNC367732
: Work Orders:
: SNC361836, SNC367732


==Section 1R18: Plant Modifications==
==Section 1R18: Plant Modifications==
Line 424: Line 517:
: Procedures:
: Procedures:
: FNP-0-MP-18.2, Kerotest "Y" Type Globe Valves Inspection and Rework, Version 14.0
: FNP-0-MP-18.2, Kerotest "Y" Type Globe Valves Inspection and Rework, Version 14.0
: FNP-0-PMP-505, Appendix c, Shop Hydrostatic/Pneumatic Test Sequence Sheet, Version 25.0
: FNP-0-PMP-505, Appendix c, Shop Hydrostatic/Pneumatic Test Sequence Sheet, Version 25.0  
: Work Orders: SNC58098, 1091921808
: Work Orders:
: SNC58098, 1091921808


==Section 1R19: Post Maintenance Testing==
==Section 1R19: Post Maintenance Testing==
: Condition Reports: 34650, 36066,
: Condition Reports:
: 34650, 36066,
: 193765,
: 193765,
: 389633,
: 389633,
: 411896,
: 411896,
: 412721,
: 412721,
: 414988
: 414988  
: Documents:
: Documents:
: DOEJ-PFSNC371214-J001, Document of Engineering Judgment for Barton 764 Differential Pressure Transmitter Repair for Unit 1 PT0952
: DOEJ-PFSNC371214-J001, Document of Engineering Judgment for Barton 764 Differential Pressure Transmitter Repair for Unit 1 PT0952
Line 439: Line 534:
: CR2009103575, Version 1.0
: CR2009103575, Version 1.0
: NMP-GM-011, Procurement, Receipt, and Control of Materials and Services, Version 18.0
: NMP-GM-011, Procurement, Receipt, and Control of Materials and Services, Version 18.0
: NMP-GM-026, Control of Nonconforming Items Removed from Service, Version 1.0  
: NMP-GM-026, Control of Nonconforming Items Removed from Service, Version 1.0  
: Attachment Drawings: D205038, Sheet 2, Version 23.0 D205039, Sheet 6, Version 2.0 D205041, Version 18.0  
: Attachment Drawings: D205038, Sheet 2, Version 23.0 D205039, Sheet 6, Version 2.0 D205041, Version 18.0  
: Procedures:
: Procedures:
Line 454: Line 549:
: FNP-2-STP-11.2, 2B RHR Pump Quarterly Comprehensive In-Service Test and Pre-Service Test, Version 34.1
: FNP-2-STP-11.2, 2B RHR Pump Quarterly Comprehensive In-Service Test and Pre-Service Test, Version 34.1
: FNP-2-STP-11.6, Residual Heat Removal Valves In-Service Test, Version 43.1
: FNP-2-STP-11.6, Residual Heat Removal Valves In-Service Test, Version 43.1
: FNP-2-STP-213.23, Steam Generator 2C Q2C22FT0494 Loop Calibration and Operational Test, Version 46.0
: FNP-2-STP-213.23, Steam Generator 2C Q2C22FT0494 Loop Calibration and Operational Test, Version 46.0  
: Technical Evaluations: 21465,
: Technical Evaluations:
: 21465,
: 322282,
: 322282,
: 323080
: 323080  
: Work Orders: SNC74759, SNC328799, SNC330858, SNC359404, SNC359780, SNC370746, SNC370316
: Work Orders:
: SNC74759, SNC328799, SNC330858, SNC359404, SNC359780, SNC370746, SNC370316


==Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing==
==Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing==
: Drawings: D205007, Sheet 1, Version 24.0
: Drawings: D205007, Sheet 1, Version 24.0  
: Procedures:
: Procedures:
: FNP-1-STP-16.12A, 1A Containment Spray Pump Automatic Starting Circuitry Test, Version 7.0
: FNP-1-STP-16.12A, 1A Containment Spray Pump Automatic Starting Circuitry Test, Version 7.0
Line 495: Line 592:


==Section 1EP6: Drill Evaluation==
==Section 1EP6: Drill Evaluation==
: Documents: Emergency Preparedness Crew 4 Drill Scenario Guide dated 2/22/2012  
: Documents:
: Emergency Preparedness Crew 4 Drill Scenario Guide dated 2/22/2012  
: Procedures:
: Procedures:
: NMP-EP-110, Emergency Classification Determination and Initial Action, versions 1.0 and 2.0
: NMP-EP-110, Emergency Classification Determination and Initial Action, versions 1.0 and 2.0
Line 502: Line 600:
==Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator Verification 71151==
==Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator Verification 71151==
: Condition Reports:
: Condition Reports:
: 352446,372945
: 2446,372945  
: Documents: Farley Unit 1 and Unit 2 Consolidated Data Entry, MSPI Derivation Report, Emergency AC
: Documents:
: Farley Unit 1 and Unit 2 Consolidated Data Entry, MSPI Derivation Report, Emergency AC
: NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6 Power System Unavailability and Unreliability Indexes, dated January 2012 Selected Unit 1 and Unit 2 Control Room Logs from January 2011 through January 2012
: NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6 Power System Unavailability and Unreliability Indexes, dated January 2012 Selected Unit 1 and Unit 2 Control Room Logs from January 2011 through January 2012


Line 510: Line 609:
: 361386,
: 361386,
: 369262  
: 369262  
: Documents: NRC Bulleting 88-03, Inadequate Latch Engagement in HFA Type Latching Relays Manufactured by General Electric Company, NRC Information Notice 88-69, Movable Contact Finger Binding in HFA Relays Manufactured by General Electric
: Documents:
: NRC Bulleting 88-03, Inadequate Latch Engagement in HFA Type Latching Relays Manufactured by General Electric Company, NRC Information Notice 88-69, Movable Contact Finger Binding in HFA Relays Manufactured by General Electric
: NMP-GM-002-F02, Apparent Cause Determination Report
: NMP-GM-002-F02, Apparent Cause Determination Report
: 192389, Version 1.0
: 192389, Version 1.0
: NMP-GM-002-F02, Apparent Cause Determination Report
: NMP-GM-002-F02, Apparent Cause Determination Report
: 192663, Version 1.010CFR21 Report made from General Electric Company to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regarding Type HFA Relay with Latching Mechanisms, dated November 12, 1987  
: 192663, Version 1.010CFR21 Report made from General Electric Company to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regarding Type HFA Relay with Latching Mechanisms, dated November 12, 1987  
: Attachment Drawings:D204738, Version 1.3D207646, Version 10.0U215656, Version 2.0Procedures:
: Attachment Drawings:D204738, Version 1.3D207646, Version 10.0U215656, Version 2.0Procedures:
: FNP-2-STP-40.0, Safety Injection with Loss of Off-Site Power Test, Version 61.0
: FNP-2-STP-40.0, Safety Injection with Loss of Off-Site Power Test, Version 61.0  
: Technical Evaluations:
: Technical Evaluations:
: 294910
: 294910
: Work Orders: SNC50566, SNC58494, SNC77088, SNC77096, SNC321086, SNC328459, SNC339688, SNC339687, SNC340011, SNC340647, SNC376713
: Work Orders:
: SNC50566, SNC58494, SNC77088, SNC77096, SNC321086, SNC328459, SNC339688, SNC339687, SNC340011, SNC340647, SNC376713


==Section 4OA3: Event Follow-up==
==Section 4OA3: Event Follow-up==
: Condition Reports: 20111100095,
: Condition Reports:
: 20111100095,
: 2011101216,
: 2011101216,
: 2011105641
: 2011105641  
: Documents: Basic Cause Determination, Significant Near Miss Due to Inadequate Impact Review of Design Change for RCP Undervoltage Relays Corrective Action Report
: Documents:
: Basic Cause Determination, Significant Near Miss Due to Inadequate Impact Review of Design Change for RCP Undervoltage Relays Corrective Action Report
: 191998, Deficiencies Identified in the Impact Review Process Corrective Action Report
: 191998, Deficiencies Identified in the Impact Review Process Corrective Action Report
: 193069, Ineffective Impact Reviews Leads to Program Gaps in Nonconforming Issues, dated February 13, 2012 Farley Organization Effectiveness Improvement Plan Performance Gap Item #2 Action Plan
: 193069, Ineffective Impact Reviews Leads to Program Gaps in Nonconforming Issues, dated February 13, 2012 Farley Organization Effectiveness Improvement Plan Performance Gap Item #2 Action Plan
Line 539: Line 642:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Nuclear Management Procedure (NMP)-AD-008, Applicability Determinations, Version 15.0 Plant Modification Procedure
: Nuclear Management Procedure (NMP)-AD-008, Applicability Determinations, Version 15.0 Plant Modification Procedure
: FNP-0-PMP-509.0, Installation of Concrete, Grout, and Block Work, Version 14.0  
: FNP-0-PMP-509.0, Installation of Concrete, Grout, and Block Work, Version 14.0
===Documents===
===Documents===
: C090680201C002, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - General Arrangement C090680201C003, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Excavation and Backfill - Plan and Sections C090680201C004, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Grading and Drainage Plan C090680201C005, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Miscellaneous Pads Location - Plan  
: C090680201C002, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - General Arrangement C090680201C003, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Excavation and Backfill - Plan and Sections C090680201C004, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Grading and Drainage Plan C090680201C005, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Miscellaneous Pads Location - Plan  
Line 545: Line 648:
: C090680201C008, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Finished Surface Aggregate Plan C090680201C009, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Sections and Details Attachment C090680201C010, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Fence and Gate Location - Plan C090680201C011, Version 1.0, Permanent Plant Roads General Layout & Survey Benchmarks C090680201C012, Version 1.0, General Arrangement Outside of Building C090680201C013, Version 1.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - 6' Fence and Gate Details  
: C090680201C008, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Finished Surface Aggregate Plan C090680201C009, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Sections and Details Attachment C090680201C010, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Fence and Gate Location - Plan C090680201C011, Version 1.0, Permanent Plant Roads General Layout & Survey Benchmarks C090680201C012, Version 1.0, General Arrangement Outside of Building C090680201C013, Version 1.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - 6' Fence and Gate Details  
: C090680201M002, Version 1.0, Fire Protection - Piping Layout of Yard Mains C090680201M003, Version 1.0, Fire Protection - Underground Firemain Layout - Main
: C090680201M002, Version 1.0, Fire Protection - Piping Layout of Yard Mains C090680201M003, Version 1.0, Fire Protection - Underground Firemain Layout - Main
: Plant Area
: Plant Area Other
: Other
: ACI 301-10, Specifications for Structural Concrete
: ACI 301-10, Specifications for Structural Concrete
: ACI 318-08, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete
: ACI 318-08, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete

Revision as of 22:51, 28 July 2018

IR 05000348-12-002; 05000364-12-002; and 07200042/2012001 January 1 Through March 31, 2012; Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Integrated Report
ML12122A814
Person / Time
Site: Farley, 07200042  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/30/2012
From: Ehrhardt F J
NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB2
To: Lynch T A
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
References
IR-12-001
Download: ML12122A814 (29)


Text

April 30, 2012

Mr. Tom Site Vice President - Farley Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

7388 North State Highway 95 Columbia, AL 36319

SUBJECT: JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000348/2012002; 05000364/2012002; AND 07200042/2012001

Dear Mr. Lynch:

On March 31, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on April 12, 2012, with you and members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The NRC reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities and interviewed personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC public document room or from the publicly available records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the public electronic reading room).

Sincerely,/RA/ Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Docket No.: 50-348, 50-364,72-042 License No.: NPF-2, NPF-8

Enclosure:

(See next page)

__ ML12122A814 ________

G SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE G FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP RIII:DRP RII:DRP RII:DRS NSIR NSIR SIGNATURE /RA By FEhrhardt/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA By E-mail/0 /RA By E_mail/ /RA By-e-mail/ /RA By-e-mail/ NAME MMiller TLighty FEhrhardt ECrowe JSowe RCarrion JLanghlin DATE 4/27/2012 4/27/2012 4/27/2012 4/23/2012 4/23/2012 4/23/2012 4/23/2012 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO SNC 2

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 05000348/2012002; 05000364/2012002; and 07200042/2012001

w/Attachment:

Supplemental Information

cc w/encl: S. Kuczynski Chairman, President and CEO Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution

J. L. Pemberton SVP & General Counsel-Ops & SNC Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution D. G. Bost Chief Nuclear Officer Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution Paula Marino Vice President Engineering Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution

M. J. Ajluni Nuclear Licensing Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution

Mark Williams Commissioner Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution

B. D. McKinney, Jr. Regulatory Response Manager Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution D. W. Daughhetee Licensing Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution

T. D. Honeycutt Regulatory Response Supervisor Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution Bradley J. Adams Vice President Fleet Operations Support Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution N. J. Stringfellow Licensing Manager Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution L. P. Hill Licensing Supervisor Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution L. L. Crumpton Administrative Assistant, Sr. Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution William D. Oldfield Principal Licensing Engineer Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Electronic Mail Distribution (cc w/encl cont'd - See next page)

SNC 3 cc w/encl cont'd: Todd L. Youngblood Plant Manager Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Electronic Mail Distribution John G. Horn Site Support Manager Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant U.S. NRC P. O. Box 620 Ashford, AL 36312 Cynthia A. Sanders Radioactive Materials Program Manager Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution James C. Hardeman Environmental Radiation Program Manager Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution Mr. Mark Culver Chairman Houston County Commission P. O. Box 6406 Dothan, AL 36302

James L. McNees, CHP Director Office of Radiation Control Alabama Dept. of Public Health P. O. Box 303017 Montgomery, AL 36130-3017

Donald E. Williamson State Health Officer Alabama Dept. of Public Health RSA Tower - Administration Suite 1552 P.O. Box 30317 Montgomery, AL 36130-3017 Chuck Mueller Manager Policy and Radiation Program Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution SNC 4 Letter to Tom from Frank Ehrhardt dated April 30, 2012.

SUBJECT: JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000348/2012002; 05000364/2012002; AND 07200042/2012001 Distribution w/encl

C. Evans, RII L. Douglas, RII OE Mail RIDSNRRDIRS PUBLIC RidsNrrPMFarley Resource

Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II

Docket Nos.: 05000348, 05000364, 07200042 07200042/2012001 License Nos.: NPF-2, NPF-8

Report No.: 05000348/2012002; 05000364/2012002; and 07200042/2012001 Licensee: Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

Facility: Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Location: Columbia, AL

Dates: January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012

Inspectors: E. Crowe, Senior Resident Inspector J. Sowa, Resident Inspector R. Carrion, Senior Reactor Inspector (Section 4OA5) J. Laughlin, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, (Section 1EP4)

Approved by: Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000348/2012002; 05000364/2012002; and 07200042/2012001 January 1 through March 31, 2012; Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Integrated Report.

The report covered a three-month period of inspection by the resident inspectors, one senior reactor inspector and one emergency preparedness inspector. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December, 2006. No findings were identified during this inspection period.

A. NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings

No findings were identified.

B. Licensee-identified Violations None

REPORT DETAILS

Summary of Plant Status

Unit 1 was at 100% rated thermal power (RTP) at the start of this report period. The licensee shut down Unit 1 on January 17 to install monitoring equipment on the main turbine. The license restarted Unit 1 on January 20 and achieved 100% RTP on January 23. The unit remained at or near 100% RTP until the licensee started a reactor coolant system temperature coast down on March 12 for the next refueling outage. Unit 1 remained in this mode of operation until the end of the inspection period. Unit 1 was at 78% RTP and coasting down for a refueling outage at the end of this inspection period.

Unit 2 was at 100% RTP at the start of this report period. Unit 2 remained at or near 100% RTP for the remainder of the inspection period.

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, Barrier Integrity

1R01 Adverse Weather Protection

a. Inspection Scope

Seasonal Readiness Review: The inspectors evaluated implementation of the licensee's cold weather contingency procedure, FNP-0-SOP-0.12, and conditions for entry into the procedure. The inspectors examined heat tracing lines on the condensate storage tanks and refueling water storage tanks to verify these protections for cold weather conditions were functional. The emergency diesel generator building and service water intake structure were also evaluated to ensure provisions were implemented to compensate for any known deficiencies. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.

Impending Adverse Conditions: The inspectors evaluated implementation of adverse weather preparation procedures and compensatory measures for the following adverse weather condition. The inspectors walked-down portions of the main steam systems, condensate storage systems, refueling water storage tanks, and emergency diesel generators. These systems were selected because their safety-related functions could be affected by freezing weather. The inspectors verified the applicable portions of procedure FNP-0-AOP-21.0, "Severe Weather," were performed. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

  • Projected freezing temperatures for January 4, 2012 External Flooding: The inspectors reviewed the Final Safety Analysis Report and site design documents related to the probable mean precipitation event and potential upstream flooding concerns. The inspectors performed a walk-down of the site topography to ensure no changes had occurred that could adversely affect site design criteria. The inspection included tanks, outside doors and thresholds, and underground vault openings to outside areas to ensure design measures were in place to mitigate potential external flooding concerns. The inspectors determined that openings in risk significant structures, systems, and components were above projected flood levels. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R04 Equipment Alignment

a. Inspection Scope

Partial Walk-Down: The inspectors performed partial walk-downs of the following four systems to verify operability of redundant or diverse trains and components when safety equipment was inoperable. The inspectors attempted to identify discrepancies impacting the function of the system and therefore, potentially increasing risk. The walk-downs were performed using the criteria in licensee procedures NMP-OS-007, "Conduct of Operations," and FNP-0-SOP-0, "General Instructions to Operations Personnel." The walk-downs included reviewing the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR), plant procedures and drawings, checks of control room and plant valves, switches, components, electrical power, support equipment, and instrumentation. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R05 Fire Protection

a. Inspection Scope

Quarterly Fire Protection Area Tours: The inspectors conducted a tour of the five fire areas listed below to assess material condition and operational status of the fire protection equipment. The inspectors verified combustibles and ignition sources were controlled in accordance with the licensee's administrative procedures, fire detection and suppression equipment was available for use, and passive fire barriers were maintained in good material condition. Additionally, inspectors verified compensatory measures for out-of-service, degraded, or inoperable fire protection equipment were implemented in accordance with the requirements of licensee procedures FNP-0-AP-36, "Fire Surveillance and Inspection," FNP-0-AP-38, "Use of Open Flame," FNP-0-AP-39, "Fire Patrols and Watches," and associated fire zone data sheets. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

  • Unit 1, cable spreading room, fire zone 40
  • Unit 1, hot shut down panel room, fire zone 12
  • Unit 1/2, service water intake structure B train 4160V switchgear room, fire zone 72B
  • Unit 2, cable spreading room, fire zone 40
  • Unit 2, hot shut down panel room, fire zone 15

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R06 Flood Protection Measures

.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed selected risk-important plant design features and licensee procedures intended to protect the plant and its safety-related equipment from internal flooding events. The inspectors reviewed flood analysis and design documents, the UFSAR, engineering calculations, and abnormal operating procedures for licensee commitments. The inspectors walked down the area listed below to verify plant design features and plant procedures for flood mitigation were consistent with design requirements and internal flooding analysis assumptions. The inspectors reviewed flood protection barriers, which included plant floor drains, condition of room penetrations, condition of the sumps in the rooms, and condition of water-tight doors. The inspectors also reviewed CRs to verify the licensee was identifying and resolving problems. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

  • Unit 1, charging pump 1C, room 181

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Annual Review of Cables Located in Underground Bunkers/Manholes

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors conducted an inspection of the following four underground bunkers/manholes subject to flooding and containing cables whose failure could disable risk-significant equipment. The inspectors walked down risk-significant areas to verify cables were not submerged and that cables and/or splices appeared intact. Additionally, inspectors observed the condition of cable support structures. When applicable, the inspectors verified proper dewater device (sump pump) operation and verified level arm circuits were set appropriately, ensuring the cables would not be submerged. Where dewatering devices were not installed, the inspectors' verified drainage was provided and functioning properly.

  • Unit 1, Electrical pull boxes/cable vaults A1M40
  • Unit 1, Electrical pull boxes/cable vaults A1M43
  • Unit 2, Electrical pull boxes/cable vaults A1M41

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program

a. Inspection Scope

Resident Inspector Quarterly Review (Licensed Operator Requalification): The inspectors observed portions of the licensed operator training and testing program on January 25. The inspectors verified implementation of procedures FNP-0-AP-45, "Farley Nuclear Plant Training Plan," FNP-0-TCP-17.6, "Simulator Training Evaluation/Documentation," and FNP-0-TCP-17.3, "Licensed Operator Continuing Training Program Administration." The inspectors observed operations simulator scenario 12-S1103, conducted in the licensee's simulator for a loss of the 1C charging pump and a main steam header rupture concurrent with B train main steam isolation valves failure to close. The inspectors observed high-risk operator actions, overall crew performance, self-critiques, training feedback, and management oversight to verify operator performance was evaluated against the performance standards of the licensee's scenario. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.

Resident Inspector Quarterly Review (Licensed Operator Performance): The inspectors observed control room operator performance during an elevated GREEN risk condition due to the Unit 2 turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump (TDAFWP) being out of service for maintenance on March 6. Inspectors observed licensed operator conduct and operations to assess the following:

  • Operator compliance and use of plant procedures
  • Control board/in-plant component manipulations
  • Communications between crew members
  • Use and interpretation of plant instruments, indications, and alarms
  • Diagnosis of plant conditions based on instruments, indications, and alarms
  • Use of human error prevention techniques, such as pre-job briefs and peer checking
  • Documentation of activities, including initials and sign-offs in procedures, control room logs, technical specification (TS) entry and exit, and service logs entries
  • Management and supervision of activities, including risk management and reactivity management
  • Pre-job briefs Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R12 Maintenance Effectiveness

a. Inspection Scope

Resident Inspector Quarterly Inspection Samples

The inspectors reviewed the following two condition reports:
  • CR 394283, Partial loss of Unit 1 annunciators during maintenance to annunciator power supply for panel B and panel C
  • CR 401257, Unit 1 refueling water storage tank level instrument (LT502) found out of tolerance low The inspectors reviewed the condition reports for the following attributes:
  • Appropriate work practices
  • Identifying and addressing common cause failures
  • Characterizing reliability issues for performance
  • Trending key parameters for condition monitoring
  • Charging unavailability for performance
  • Appropriateness of performance criteria for structures, systems, and components (SSCs)/functions classified as (a)(2) and/or appropriateness and adequacy of goals and corrective actions for SSCs/functions classified as (a)(1).

In addition, the NRC specifically reviewed events where ineffective equipment maintenance resulted in invalid automatic actuations of engineered safeguards systems affecting the operating units. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the following five activities to verify appropriate risk assessments were performed prior to taking equipment out of service for maintenance. The inspectors verified risk assessments were performed as required by 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4), and were accurate and complete. When emergent work was performed, the inspectors verified appropriate use of the licensee's risk assessment and risk categories in accordance with requirements in licensee procedures FNP-0-ACP-52.3, "Mode 1, 2, & 3 Risk Assessment," FNP-0-UOP-4.0, "General Outage Operations Guidance," NMP-GM-006, "Work Management," and NMP-OS-007, "Conduct of Operations."

  • Unit 1, January 11, 2012, YELLOW risk condition associated with 1A motor driven auxiliary feedwater pump (MDAFWP) out of service for maintenance
  • Unit 2, February 8, 2012, elevated GREEN risk condition associated with 2B RHR pump out of service for maintenance concurrent with 2C auxiliary building battery charger out of service and high voltage switchyard activities
  • Unit 1, February 15, 2012, elevated GREEN risk condition associated with 1A MDAFWP out of service for maintenance concurrent with 1C auxiliary battery charger and 1B containment cooler slow speed breaker out of service
  • Unit 1, February 29, 2012, YELLOW risk condition associated with 1A spent fuel pool pump outage
  • Unit 2, March 6, 2012, elevated GREEN risk condition associated with TDAFWP out of service for maintenance concurrent with 2C auxiliary battery charger out of service

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R15 Operability Evaluations

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the following six operability evaluations to verify the requirements of licensee procedures NMP-OS-007, "Conduct of Operations" and NMP-AD-012, "ODs and Functionality Assessments" were met. The scope of this inspection also included a review of the technical adequacy of the evaluations, the adequacy of compensatory measures, and the impact on continued plant operation.

  • CR 389135 Unit 1, jumper left in 1B CCW train A control circuit for greater than 90 days
  • CR 394663 Unit 1, A train containment spray pump motor inboard bearing found to have badly discolored oil while drawing samples
  • CR399900 Unit 1, 1A diesel tunnel found to have elevated water level with the potential to expose safety related electrical cables to submerged conditions
  • CR405411, Units 1 and 2, seismic panel alarm event light on panel lit and main control board annunciator light illuminated
  • CR413908, Unit 2 "C" steam generator wide range level transmitter evaluated for operability following Rosemount Nuclear part 21 report identifying affected transmitters with instrument accuracy errors
  • CR420129, Unit 2 TDAFWP oil samples contain high water content

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R18 Plant Modifications

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the following permanent plant modification to ensure the safety functions of important safety systems were unaffected. The inspectors also verified that design bases, licensing bases and performance capability of risk-significant SSCs had not been degraded through modifications. The inspectors verified that any modification performed during a risk-significant configuration did not place the plant in an unsafe condition. The inspectors evaluated system operability, availability, configuration control, post-installation test activities, documentation updates, and operator awareness of the modification. Document reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

  • DCP 1091921801, Unit 1, ECCS Vent VLVS Installation at Critical Locations per GL2008-01

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R19 Post-Maintenance Testing

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the criteria contained in licensee procedures FNP-0-PMT-0.0, "Post-Maintenance Test Program," to verify post-maintenance test procedures and test activities for the following five systems/components were adequate to verify system operability and functional capability. The inspectors also witnessed the test or reviewed the test data to verify test results adequately demonstrated restoration of the affected safety functions. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.

  • FNP-0-STP-26.0A, Control Room Train A Ventilation Operability Test following replacement of control room air conditioning air handler fan bearing
  • FNP-1-STP-220.3, Containment Pressure Loop Calibration and Operational Test Q1E13PT0952 following repair of containment pressure transmitter PT952
  • FNP-2-SOP-1.1, Reactor Coolant System, Section 4.7, PRZR Heater Operation following replacement of circuit breaker Q2R16BKREC11
  • FNP-2-STP-11.2, 2B RHR Pump Quarterly Inservice Test following replacement of current to pneumatic converter on air operated discharge valve Q2E11FCV603B
  • FNP-2-STP-213.23, Steam Generator 2C Q2C22FT0494 Loop Calibration and Operation Test following the declaration of Q2C22FT0494 (Steam Generator 2C flow transmitter) inoperable for lower than normal reading

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R22 Surveillance Testing

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the following five tests and either observed the test or reviewed test results to verify testing adequately demonstrated equipment operability and met technical specification (TS) requirements. The inspectors reviewed the activities to assess for preconditioning of equipment, procedure adherence, and valve alignment following completion of the surveillance. The inspectors reviewed licensee procedures FNP-0-AP-24, "Test Control," FNP-0-M-050, "Master List of Surveillance Requirements,"

and NMP-OS-007, "Conduct of Operations," and attended selected briefings to determine if procedure requirements were met. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.

Surveillance Tests

  • FNP-2-STP-10.3, Emergency Core Cooling Valves Inservice Test and PORV Block Valve Stroke Test
  • FNP-2-STP-33.2B, Reactor Trip Breaker Train B Operability Test In-Service Test (IST)

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

Cornerstone:

Emergency Preparedness (EP)1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes

a. Inspection Scope

The NSIR headquarters staff performed an in-office review of the latest revision of an Emergency Plan Implementing procedure (EPIP), located under ADAMS accession number ML12061A039, as listed in the Attachment.

The licensee transmitted this procedure revision to the NRC pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section V, "Implementing Procedures." The NRC review was not documented in a safety evaluation report and did not constitute approval of licensee-generated changes; therefore, this revision is subject to future inspection. The specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1EP6 Drill Evaluation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors observed the licensee's response to a routine emergency drill. The inspectors evaluated licensee performance to identify any weaknesses and deficiencies in event classification, notification, and protective action recommendations. The inspectors observed emergency response center operation to verify event classification and notifications were performed in accordance with FNP-0-EIP-9.0, "Emergency Classification and Actions." The inspectors used procedure NMP-303.0, "Drill and Exercise Standards," as the inspection criteria. The inspectors also attended the licensee critiques of the drill to compare any inspector-observed weaknesses with those identified by the licensee, in order to determine whether the licensee was properly identifying issues.

  • February 22, 2012 - General Emergency due to large break loss of coolant accident concurrent with a fuel failure and high dose measurements at the site boundary.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee data for the three performance indicators (PIs) listed below to verify the accuracy of the PI data reported. Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Indicator Guideline," Rev. 6, was used to verify the basis in reporting for each data element. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachment.

Cornerstone:

Initiating Events

Cornerstone:

Mitigating Systems

  • Emergency AC Power System

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems

.1 Daily Condition Report (CR) Reviews

As required by IP 71152, "Identification and Resolution of Problems," and in order to identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance issues for follow-up, the NRC performed a daily screening of items entered into the licensee's corrective action program (CAP). This review was accomplished by reviewing copies of CRs, attending daily screening meetings, and accessing the licensee's computerized database.

.2 Selected Issue Follow-up Inspection

a. Inspection Scope

In addition to the routine review, the inspectors selected the two issues listed below for more in-depth reviews.

  • CR 361386, 2B MDAFWP failed to start during ESS/LOSP sequencer test
  • CR 369262, Unit 2 MOV 8803A HHSI to RCS cold leg isolation opened unexpectedly The inspectors considered the following attributes during the review of the licensee's actions:
  • Complete and accurate identification of the problem in a timely manner
  • Evaluation and disposition of operability/reportability issues
  • Consideration of extent of condition, generic implications, common cause, and previous occurrences
  • Classification and prioritization of the resolution of the problem
  • Identification of root and contributing causes of the problem
  • Identification of CRs
  • Completion of corrective actions in a timely manner b. Observations
CR 361386: The licensee conducted a routine surveillance of the B2G sequencer on October 15, 2011. The surveillance tested the functionality of the sequencer to auto-start various components in response to a safety injection (SI) actuation concurrent with a loss of off-site power (LOSP). Step 5 of the sequencer failed to actuate and the 2B hydrogen cavity dilution fan and the 2B motor driven auxiliary feedwater (MDAFW) pump did not auto-start as expected. The licensee conducted troubleshooting of the circuit and the HFA style relay which failed to actuate during step 5 of the sequencer test. The licensee's internal testing did not find a fault with the circuit or the relay. The licensee conservatively replaced the relay and successfully completed the surveillance to demonstrate operability of the B2G sequencer.

The inspectors reviewed the surveillance test procedures during which step 5 failed to auto-start the 2B MDAFWP as well as the successful surveillance following the installation of a new HFA style relay (FNP-2-STP-40.0). The inspectors also interviewed station personnel to understand the depth of troubleshooting and the apparent cause of the failure. Inspectors reviewed the ESS/LOSP sequencer schematics (drawing 207646) as well as work orders that detailed troubleshooting of the relay and subsequent installation of a new relay (SNC work orders 77088, 340011, 339687, and 340647). The inspectors did not identify any operability concerns with station equipment.

CR 369262: MOV 8803A unexpectedly opened on November 3, 2011, during a maintenance activity for the K604 slave relay in the solid state protection system. The relay was not recognized to be in a latched condition when the lead associated with MOV 8803A was landed causing the valve to stroke open. MOV 8803A was subsequently closed after about 2 minutes and power was removed to prevent another stroke. While the MOV was opened, approximately 500 gallons of borated water were inadvertently injected from the refueling water storage tank (RWST) to the reactor coolant system (RCS) cold leg. The licensee made a non-emergency, telephonic notification to the NRC on November 28, 2011, in lieu of a written Licensee Event Report (LER) in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A).

The inspectors reviewed the telephonic event report and related station documents, and interviewed engineering and maintenance personnel regarding the installation of the K604 relay. The relay was being installed as a replacement after a K604 relay had previously failed to actuate during a performance of FNP-2-STP-40.0 (Safety Injection with Loss of Off-Site Power Test). Maintenance personnel incorrectly installed the relay with the latching assembly in the latched configuration, which immediately caused MOV8803A to stroke open. The relay should have been installed in the unlatched position to ensure proper system response.

Additionally, the inspectors reviewed the licensee's apparent cause determination report and did not find any issues with the licensee's causal analysis or have concerns about the operability of similar components due to this issue. The inspectors determined that the licensee failed to properly install the relay in accordance with the associated work order. Because there was no actual safety consequences associated with the opening of MOV8803A, the issue was determined to be minor.

.3 Operator Work-Around Annual Review

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a detailed review of the licensee's operator work-around list, operator burden list, and control room deficiency list for Units 1 and 2 in effect on March 14, 2012. The inspectors reviewed the proposed corrective actions and schedule for each item on the lists. The inspectors reviewed the compensatory actions and cumulative effects on plant operation. The inspectors verified each item was being dispositioned in accordance with plant procedure FNP-0-ACP-17.0, "Work-Around Program."

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA3 Event Follow-up

(Closed) LER 05000364/2011-001-00 Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Inoperable

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed information contained in the licensee's submittal of LER 05000364/2011-001-00. The inspectors reviewed station logs to identify any additional equipment which may have been out of service during the period of time the TDAFW pump was inoperable (July 7 - August 1, 2011). The inspectors identified four occasions where additional equipment was out of service which would have adversely affected the safety function of the Unit 2 auxiliary feedwater system. The license also identified these occasions in their LER submittal. The inspectors reviewed licensee's TS 3.7.5, Condition C which states in part, "if two AFW trains are inoperable be in Mode 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and be in Mode 4 within the following 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />." The inspectors reviewed licensee's TS 3.0.2 which states in part, "upon discovery of a failure to meet a Limiting Condition of Operability, the Required Actions, of the associated Conditions shall be met, -" The inspectors determined from their review of station documents the point of discovery occurred during the licensee's cause determination of the pump over speed event following the return of the TDAFW pump to an operable condition. The inspectors also monitored the licensee's activities at the point of discovery and determined the licensee returned the equipment to service within the time limits of TS 3.7.5, Condition A. Additionally, inspectors reviewed the licensee's corrective action program to ensure this event was adequately captured and that pump operability had been correctly restored. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's cause determination for this event to ensure corrective actions would address the root causes of this event. The inspectors discovered the licensee had performed cause determinations for observations provided by self assessment activities which overlapped this event. The inspectors also reviewed the corrective actions from these cause determinations.

b. Findings

No findings were identified. The inspectors determined the time limits of TS 3.7.5, Condition C had been exceeded but did not identify a performance deficiency because the condition was not reasonably within the licensee's ability to foresee and correct, and therefore could not have been prevented. Integrated Inspection Report 05000348/2011005 and 05000364/2011005; and 05000364/2011014, issued January 27, 2012, documented a Green, self-revealing NCV (05000364/20110014-01) of 10CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, Design Control, for the licensee's failure to correctly update their design drawing for the Unit 2 TDAFW pump electrical controls. The inspectors determined the licensee's failure to correctly update their design drawing for the Unit 2 TDAFW pump electrical controls caused TS 3.7.5, Condition C to be exceeded. This LER is closed.

4OA5 Other Activities

On-Site Fabrication of Components and Construction of an ISFSI (60853)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors conducted a review of licensee and vendor activities in preparation for the concrete placement for the center sections (Pour Nos. 4-2 and 5-2, respectively) of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) pad expansion for Pads Nos.4 and 5 upon which 24 Holtec HI-STORM 100 vertical storage modules will be sited (12 on each pad) to house spent fuel generated by the licensee. The inspectors walked down the construction area of the ISFSI pad and examined the rebar installation and verified that the rebar size, spacing, splice length, and concrete coverage on the top, side, and bottom complied with licensee-approved drawings, specifications, procedures, and other associated documents, and that compliance with applicable American Concrete Institute (ACI) codes, American Society for the Testing of Materials standards, the Certificate of Compliance, and Technical Specifications was met. The inspectors also evaluated the concrete formwork installation for depth, straightness, and horizontal bracing and verified the overall dimensions and orientation for compliance with licensee-approved drawings. The inspectors interviewed licensee and contract personnel to verify knowledge of the planned work. The inspectors also observed concrete delivery, placement, and vibration of the ISFSI slab center sections and observed tests for concrete slump and air content, temperature measurements, and the collection and preparation of concrete cylinder samples for later compression tests to verify that the work was implemented according to licensee-approved specifications and procedures and referenced industry codes and standards. The inspectors also reviewed the seven-day compression test results, performed by an independent laboratory, for the concrete placements observed as well as the seven-day and twenty-eight-day compressive test results for previously completed sections to verify that the acceptance criteria as defined by the Final Safety Analysis Report were met.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

The NRC presented the inspection results to you and members of your staff on April 12, 2012. The staff acknowledged the results. The NRC confirmed proprietary information was not provided or examined during the inspection.

4OA7 Licensee-Identified Violations

None ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

C. Channell, Dry Cask Storage Engineering Supervisor
J. Fitzgerald, Special Projects ISFSI Engineer
C. Gayheart, Plant Manager
J. Horn, Site Support Manager
F. Hundley, Fleet Oversight Supervisor
J. Jerkins, Corrective Action Program Supervisor
T. Lynch, Site Vice President
R. Martin, Engineering Programs Manager
W. Oldfield, Licensing Engineer
W. Phillips, Dry Cask Storage Engineer
L. Smith, Maintenance Manager
B. Taylor, Performance Improvement Supervisor
C. Thornell, Operations Manger
R. Tyler, Special Projects ISFSI Engineer
S. Varnum, Chemistry Manager
C. Westberry, Engineering Systems Manager

NRC personnel

Frank Ehrhardt, Chief, Branch 2, Division of Reactor Projects

E. Crowe, Senior Resident Inspector

LIST OF REPORT ITEMS

Opened

None

Opened and Closed

None

Closed

05000364/LER-2011-001-00 LER Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Inoperable (Section 4OA3)

Discussed

None

Attachment

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection

Condition Reports:
23088, 52158, 58947, 69298, 69483, 69590, 69651, 69836, 69837,
338249,
405969,
423770,
2011104097,
2011104389
Documents:
FAX19-1 Book S28 Calculations, Grading and Drainage Intercompany memorandum dated January 10, 1990, Generic Letter 89-22 - Latest Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Criteria (ENG-90-121) MDC S080535201
Procedures:
FNP-0-GMP-84.0, Installation of Plastic Sheeting Over Main Steam Valve Room Grating, Version 8.0
FNP-0-SOP-0.12, Cold Weather Contingencies, Version 17.0
FNP-0-AOP-21.0, Severe Weather," Version 32.0
FNP-1-EMP-1383.01, Freeze Protection Inspections, Version 19.0
FNP-2-EMP-1383.01, Freeze Protection Inspections, Version 16.0
Work Orders:
SNC52151, SNC55208, SNC70632, SNC86139, SNC93995, SNC96682, SNC319543, SNC378308

Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment

Condition Reports:
27619, 33527, 34650, 62959,
396911, Drawings: D170119, Sheet 1, Version 3.0 D175007, Sheet 1, Version 31.0 D175038, Sheet 3, Version 26.0 D205038, Sheet 2, Version 23.0
Procedures:
FNP-0-SOP-14.0, Containment Access System, Version 12.0
FNP-1-SOP-9.0, Containment Spray System, Version 37.0
FNP-1-SOP-9.0A, Containment Spray System, Version 8.0
FNP-1-SOP-22.0, Auxiliary Feedwater System, Version 67.0
FNP-1-SOP-22.0A, Auxiliary Feedwater System, Version 10.0
FNP-1-SOP-24.0, Service Water System, Version 76.0
FNP-1-SOP-24.0A, Service Water System - Outside Structures, Version 21.0
FNP-2-SOP-7.0, Residual Heat Removal System, Version 93.1
FNP-2-SOP-7.0A, Residual Heat Removal System, Version 8.0
Attachment

Section 1R05: Fire Protection

Drawings: A508650, Sheet 20, Version 13.0
A508650, Sheet 30, Version 11.0 A508651, Sheet 7, Version 6.0 A508651, Sheet 8, Version 3.0 A509018, Sheet 20, Version 16.0 A509018, Sheet 32, Version 7.0

Section 1R06: Flood Protection Measures

Documents:
Calculation
BM-999-1932-001, Internal Flooding Assessment UFSAR, Section 3.4 Water Level (Flood) Design
Procedures:
FNP-0-GMP-60.1, General Inspection Outdoor Electrical Duct Run Pull Boxes, Version 7.0
Work Orders:
SNC299093

Section 1R11: Licensed Operator Requalification Program

Documents:
Licensed Operator Continuing Training Simulator Exercise Guide:
LOCT 10-12 Segment 11, 12-S1103

Section 1R12: Maintenance Effectiveness

Condition Reports:
389756,
394283,
394396,
401257,
404351
Work Orders:
SNC57971, SNC359421, SNC361654, SNC365832

Section 1R13: Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Evaluation

Procedures

FNP-0-ACP-52.3, "Mode 1,2, & 3 Risk Assessment," Version 9.0
Attachment

Section 1R15: Operability Determinations

Condition Reports:
2903,
389135,
394663,
399900,
405411,
413908,
414196,
414202,
414207,
420129
Documents:
Immediate determination of operability for Unit 2 TDAFWP oil sample water content Drawings: D-177185, Sheet 1, version 18.0 D-181707, Sheet 1, version 1.0
Procedures:
FNP-1-ARP-1.12, Seismic Panel Alarm Response Procedure, Version 59.1
Technical Evaluations:
313079,
316204,
322999
Work Orders:
SNC361836, SNC367732

Section 1R18: Plant Modifications

Documents:
DCP 1091921801, Unit 1, ECCS Vent VLVS Installation at Critical Locations per GL2008-01 Southern Nuclear Nondestructive Certification Summary for Don R. Barnes (VT-2 certification)
Procedures:
FNP-0-MP-18.2, Kerotest "Y" Type Globe Valves Inspection and Rework, Version 14.0
FNP-0-PMP-505, Appendix c, Shop Hydrostatic/Pneumatic Test Sequence Sheet, Version 25.0
Work Orders:
SNC58098, 1091921808

Section 1R19: Post Maintenance Testing

Condition Reports:
34650, 36066,
193765,
389633,
411896,
412721,
414988
Documents:
DOEJ-PFSNC371214-J001, Document of Engineering Judgment for Barton 764 Differential Pressure Transmitter Repair for Unit 1 PT0952
NMP-GM-002-F02, Apparent Cause Determination Report for
CR2009103575, Version 1.0
NMP-GM-011, Procurement, Receipt, and Control of Materials and Services, Version 18.0
NMP-GM-026, Control of Nonconforming Items Removed from Service, Version 1.0
Attachment Drawings: D205038, Sheet 2, Version 23.0 D205039, Sheet 6, Version 2.0 D205041, Version 18.0
Procedures:
FNP-0-EMP-1322.01, Westinghouse and Cutler-Hammer
DS-206 and
DS-416 Circuit Breakers, Version 30.0
FNP-0-EMP-1701.01, Electrical Equipment Condition Testing, Version 18.0
FNP-0-STP-26.0A, Control Room Train A ventilation Operability Test, Version 22.0
FNP-1-STP-220.3, Containment Pressure Loop Calibration and Operational Test Q1E13PT0952, Version 29.0
FNP-1-STP-220.3A, Surveillance Test Procedure Data Package
FNP-1-STP-220.3A Containment Pressure Loop Calibration Q1E13PT0952, Version 29.0
FNP-2-IMP-213.15, Transmitter Response Check for Sensing Line Blockage on S/G 2A, S/G 2B and S/G 2C Level and Flow Instruments
FNP-2-SOP-1.1, Reactor Coolant System, Section 4.7 PRZR Heater Operation, Version 42.0
FNP-2-STP-11.2, 2B RHR Pump Quarterly Comprehensive In-Service Test and Pre-Service Test, Version 34.1
FNP-2-STP-11.6, Residual Heat Removal Valves In-Service Test, Version 43.1
FNP-2-STP-213.23, Steam Generator 2C Q2C22FT0494 Loop Calibration and Operational Test, Version 46.0
Technical Evaluations:
21465,
322282,
323080
Work Orders:
SNC74759, SNC328799, SNC330858, SNC359404, SNC359780, SNC370746, SNC370316

Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing

Drawings: D205007, Sheet 1, Version 24.0
Procedures:
FNP-1-STP-16.12A, 1A Containment Spray Pump Automatic Starting Circuitry Test, Version 7.0
FNP-1-SOP-22.0, Appendix E, Flushing AFW Pump Suction Piping, Version 67.0
FNP-1-STP-22.2, 1B Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Quarterly Inservice Test, Version 37.0
FNP-2-STP-10.3, Emergency Core Cooling Valves Inservice Test and PORV Block Valve Stroke Test, Versions 30.0, 32.0, and 34.1
FNP-2-STP-22.16, Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Quarterly Inservice Test, Version 65.1
FNP-2-STP-33.2B, Reactor Trip Breaker Train B Operability Test, Version 32.0
Work Orders:
2051956601,
2051992001,
2052051101,
2052856001,
2060092201,
2060125801,
2060201401,
2060569801,
2061169701,
2062459401,
2063187101,
2070066501,
2070797101,
2071084201, Attachment
2071833701,
2080088501,
2081074501, SNC57959, SNC61238, SNC81913, SNC82578, SNC84445, SNC84446, SNC84447, SNC84448,

Section 1R23: Plant Modifications

Drawings: D-177357, Version 38.0 D-181511, Version 26.0

Section 1EP4: Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes

FNP-0EIP-9.3, Personal Computer-Automated Dose Assessment Methods, Version 25.0

Section 1EP6: Drill Evaluation

Documents:
Emergency Preparedness Crew 4 Drill Scenario Guide dated 2/22/2012
Procedures:
NMP-EP-110, Emergency Classification Determination and Initial Action, versions 1.0 and 2.0
NMP-EP-111, Emergency Notifications, versions 4.0 and 5.0

Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator Verification 71151

Condition Reports:
2446,372945
Documents:
Farley Unit 1 and Unit 2 Consolidated Data Entry, MSPI Derivation Report, Emergency AC
NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6 Power System Unavailability and Unreliability Indexes, dated January 2012 Selected Unit 1 and Unit 2 Control Room Logs from January 2011 through January 2012

Section 4OA2: Identification and Resolution of Problems

Condition Reports:
361386,
369262
Documents:
NRC Bulleting 88-03, Inadequate Latch Engagement in HFA Type Latching Relays Manufactured by General Electric Company, NRC Information Notice 88-69, Movable Contact Finger Binding in HFA Relays Manufactured by General Electric
NMP-GM-002-F02, Apparent Cause Determination Report
192389, Version 1.0
NMP-GM-002-F02, Apparent Cause Determination Report
192663, Version 1.010CFR21 Report made from General Electric Company to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regarding Type HFA Relay with Latching Mechanisms, dated November 12, 1987
Attachment Drawings:D204738, Version 1.3D207646, Version 10.0U215656, Version 2.0Procedures:
FNP-2-STP-40.0, Safety Injection with Loss of Off-Site Power Test, Version 61.0
Technical Evaluations:
294910
Work Orders:
SNC50566, SNC58494, SNC77088, SNC77096, SNC321086, SNC328459, SNC339688, SNC339687, SNC340011, SNC340647, SNC376713

Section 4OA3: Event Follow-up

Condition Reports:
20111100095,
2011101216,
2011105641
Documents:
Basic Cause Determination, Significant Near Miss Due to Inadequate Impact Review of Design Change for RCP Undervoltage Relays Corrective Action Report
191998, Deficiencies Identified in the Impact Review Process Corrective Action Report
193069, Ineffective Impact Reviews Leads to Program Gaps in Nonconforming Issues, dated February 13, 2012 Farley Organization Effectiveness Improvement Plan Performance Gap Item #2 Action Plan

Section 4OA5: Other

Condition Reports

(CRs)

CR 423805,
CR 424359,
CR 424419,
CR425156,

Procedures

Nuclear Management Procedure (NMP)-AD-008, Applicability Determinations, Version 15.0 Plant Modification Procedure
FNP-0-PMP-509.0, Installation of Concrete, Grout, and Block Work, Version 14.0

Documents

C090680201C002, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - General Arrangement C090680201C003, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Excavation and Backfill - Plan and Sections C090680201C004, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Grading and Drainage Plan C090680201C005, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Miscellaneous Pads Location - Plan
C090680201C006, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Inner Road Plan, Sections and Details C090680201C007, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility Pad N.L. and Reinforcing
C090680201C008, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Finished Surface Aggregate Plan C090680201C009, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Sections and Details Attachment C090680201C010, Version 2.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - Fence and Gate Location - Plan C090680201C011, Version 1.0, Permanent Plant Roads General Layout & Survey Benchmarks C090680201C012, Version 1.0, General Arrangement Outside of Building C090680201C013, Version 1.0, ISFSI Storage Facility - 6' Fence and Gate Details
C090680201M002, Version 1.0, Fire Protection - Piping Layout of Yard Mains C090680201M003, Version 1.0, Fire Protection - Underground Firemain Layout - Main
Plant Area Other
ACI 301-10, Specifications for Structural Concrete
ACI 318-08, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete
ACI 349-06, Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures ASTM C 172-08, Standard Practice for Sampling Freshly Mixed Concrete1 Specification
SS-111626, Specification for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Construction for Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2, Revision 3 Design Change Package (DCP)
C090680201, Dry Cask Storage - New Pads Field Change Request (FCR) C090680201FCR001
FCR C090680201FCR002 Statement of Conformance that the product delivered conforms to all requirements specified by the purchaser, dated March 7, 2012 Certificate of Inspection (Certificate # M121989) of Scales, dated November 1, 2011
National Ready Mixed Concrete Association Certificate of Conformance for concrete supplier (Couch Ready Mix USA, Inc.), certification expires June 3, 2013 7-Day and 28-Day Compressive Test Results of Concrete Samples of the ISFSI Pad by CDG, an independent materials testing laboratory