ML20054E682: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20054E682
| number = ML20054E682
| issue date = 06/07/1982
| issue date = 06/07/1982
| title = Submits Addl Info Requested in NRC 810504 Ltr Re 810901 Response to Generic Ltr 81-01, Qualification of Insp,Exam, Testing & Audit Personnel. Commits to Conform W/Positions C.5,6,7,8 & 10 of Reg Guide 1.58,Revision 1
| title = Submits Addl Info Requested in NRC Re 810901 Response to Generic Ltr 81-01, Qualification of Insp,Exam, Testing & Audit Personnel. Commits to Conform W/Positions C.5,6,7,8 & 10 of Reg Guide 1.58,Revision 1
| author name = Widner W
| author name = Widner W
| author affiliation = GEORGIA POWER CO.
| author affiliation = GEORGIA POWER CO.
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = GL-81-01, GL-81-1, TAC-47000, TAC-47001, NUDOCS 8206140064
| document report number = GL-81-01, GL-81-1, TAC-47000, TAC-47001, NUDOCS 8206140064
| title reference date = 05-04-1981
| package number = ML20054E683
| package number = ML20054E683
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project = TAC:47000, TAC:47001
| stage = Other
}}
}}


Line 24: Line 27:
               ,  . mec , a sen Gerr x wurr
               ,  . mec , a sen Gerr x wurr
: s.      .n o,a.oa... w Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 tRC DOCKETS 50-321, 50-366 OPERATING LICENSES DPR-57, NPF-5 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1, 2 CLARIFICATION OF RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 81-01 Gentlemen:
: s.      .n o,a.oa... w Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 tRC DOCKETS 50-321, 50-366 OPERATING LICENSES DPR-57, NPF-5 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1, 2 CLARIFICATION OF RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 81-01 Gentlemen:
By letter dated April 5,1982 you requested that we clarify a portion of our letter dated September 1,                1981 which responded to NRC Generic Letter 81-01,        " Qualification of        Inspection, Examination, Testing, and Audit Personnel," dated May 4, 1981, regarding Plant Hatch - Units 1 and 2.
By {{letter dated|date=April 5, 1982|text=letter dated April 5,1982}} you requested that we clarify a portion of our letter dated September 1,                1981 which responded to NRC Generic Letter 81-01,        " Qualification of        Inspection, Examination, Testing, and Audit Personnel," dated May 4, 1981, regarding Plant Hatch - Units 1 and 2.
Specifically, you requested the following additional information:
Specifically, you requested the following additional information:
Regarding Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.58,                  Georgia Power Company states, in the September 1 letter, that,              "
Regarding Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.58,                  Georgia Power Company states, in the September 1 letter, that,              "
                                                                                         . ..we believe that we are currently in compliance .. .."        In lieu of these words we require either, a)      a clear commitment to comply, or b)      any alternate methods proposed to satisfy Regulatory Guide 1.58.
                                                                                         . ..we believe that we are currently in compliance .. .."        In lieu of these words we require either, a)      a clear commitment to comply, or b)      any alternate methods proposed to satisfy Regulatory Guide 1.58.
In response, Georgia Power Cumpany reaffirms our comitment to confor'n with Regulatory Positions C.5, 6, 7, 8, and 10 of Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1 as stated in our September 1, 1981, response. With regard to schedule, to the best of our knowledge, the present programs now in place at Plant Match are in conformance with the intent of the above referenced regulatory positions as requested by your May 4,1981 letter.
In response, Georgia Power Cumpany reaffirms our comitment to confor'n with Regulatory Positions C.5, 6, 7, 8, and 10 of Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1 as stated in our September 1, 1981, response. With regard to schedule, to the best of our knowledge, the present programs now in place at Plant Match are in conformance with the intent of the above referenced regulatory positions as requested by your {{letter dated|date=May 4, 1981|text=May 4,1981 letter}}.
If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please contact this office.
If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
Very truly yours,

Latest revision as of 14:29, 21 November 2023

Submits Addl Info Requested in NRC Re 810901 Response to Generic Ltr 81-01, Qualification of Insp,Exam, Testing & Audit Personnel. Commits to Conform W/Positions C.5,6,7,8 & 10 of Reg Guide 1.58,Revision 1
ML20054E682
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 06/07/1982
From: Widner W
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20054E683 List:
References
GL-81-01, GL-81-1, TAC-47000, TAC-47001, NUDOCS 8206140064
Download: ML20054E682 (1)


Text

Ge s;f1 d f %/.E f CWOdni

  • lil P s Pnnr3 A st rg,4 An:p s s. (im* ; a 10.3tB r, e u 404 R 4 le %

t/ s eq A n es h.1 O' ceim,4G45 A' 7'a G U ;a 3040/

June 7, 1982 Georgia Power W. A. Widner

, . mec , a sen Gerr x wurr

s. .n o,a.oa... w Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 tRC DOCKETS 50-321, 50-366 OPERATING LICENSES DPR-57, NPF-5 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1, 2 CLARIFICATION OF RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 81-01 Gentlemen:

By letter dated April 5,1982 you requested that we clarify a portion of our letter dated September 1, 1981 which responded to NRC Generic Letter 81-01, " Qualification of Inspection, Examination, Testing, and Audit Personnel," dated May 4, 1981, regarding Plant Hatch - Units 1 and 2.

Specifically, you requested the following additional information:

Regarding Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.58, Georgia Power Company states, in the September 1 letter, that, "

. ..we believe that we are currently in compliance .. .." In lieu of these words we require either, a) a clear commitment to comply, or b) any alternate methods proposed to satisfy Regulatory Guide 1.58.

In response, Georgia Power Cumpany reaffirms our comitment to confor'n with Regulatory Positions C.5, 6, 7, 8, and 10 of Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1 as stated in our September 1, 1981, response. With regard to schedule, to the best of our knowledge, the present programs now in place at Plant Match are in conformance with the intent of the above referenced regulatory positions as requested by your May 4,1981 letter.

If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please contact this office.

Very truly yours,

, */

)(/'fs? [6b A o U W. A. Widner CBS/mb xc: H. C. Nix, Jr. g R. F. Rogers, III \

J. P. O'Reilly (NRC - Region II)  !

0206140064 820607 PDR ADOCK 05000321 0 PDR