ML20069G626: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:-
VIHOINIA I3LECTRIC AND power COMPANY RIciIxoxn,VIHOINIA 20061 w.L.srnw ar x[E."aT".'""o ,                          March 23, 1983 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director                                  Serial No. 709C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation                            PSE/TLG/brh/0366C Attn: Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief                                Docket Nos. 50-338 Operating Reactors Branch No. 3                                      50-339 Division of Licensing                                  License Nos. NPF-4 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                            NPF-7 Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:
NUREG-0612 - CONTROL OF HEAVY LOADS NORTH ANNA P0HER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 In our {{letter dated|date=March 1, 1983|text=letter dated March 1, 1983}}, (Serial Number 7098), Vepco's response to TER 2.1.8 Crane Design (Guideline 7, NUREG-0612, Sec. 5.1.1(7)) , stated that the remaining four items all meet the requirements of CMAA-70 and that a report would be forwarded to the NRC as a final response to TER 2.1.8.
Enclosed, please find a copy of " Comparison Between CMAA-70 and E0CI-61" Report prepared for Vepco by Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation.
This report addresses the 14 requirements of CMAA-70 and will serve as Vepco's Final Response to TER 2.1.8.
Very truly yogy ,
                                                                          //V H. L. Stewart Enclosure cc:Mr. James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator Region II Oko!$oo$$g PDR
                                                                                      -        -. , _}}

Latest revision as of 12:19, 31 May 2023

Forwards Bechtel Assoc Revised Comparison Between CMAA-70 & EOCI-61, Final Response to Technical Evaluation Rept, Section 2.1.8 Re Crane Design Per NUREG-0612
ML20069G626
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 03/23/1983
From: Stewart W
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To: Clark R, Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20069G628 List:
References
REF-GTECI-A-36, REF-GTECI-SF, RTR-NUREG-0612, RTR-NUREG-612, TASK-A-36, TASK-OR 709C, NUDOCS 8303280105
Download: ML20069G626 (1)


Text

-

VIHOINIA I3LECTRIC AND power COMPANY RIciIxoxn,VIHOINIA 20061 w.L.srnw ar x[E."aT".'""o , March 23, 1983 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Serial No. 709C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation PSE/TLG/brh/0366C Attn: Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Docket Nos. 50-338 Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 50-339 Division of Licensing License Nos. NPF-4 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NPF-7 Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:

NUREG-0612 - CONTROL OF HEAVY LOADS NORTH ANNA P0HER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 In our letter dated March 1, 1983, (Serial Number 7098), Vepco's response to TER 2.1.8 Crane Design (Guideline 7, NUREG-0612, Sec. 5.1.1(7)) , stated that the remaining four items all meet the requirements of CMAA-70 and that a report would be forwarded to the NRC as a final response to TER 2.1.8.

Enclosed, please find a copy of " Comparison Between CMAA-70 and E0CI-61" Report prepared for Vepco by Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation.

This report addresses the 14 requirements of CMAA-70 and will serve as Vepco's Final Response to TER 2.1.8.

Very truly yogy ,

//V H. L. Stewart Enclosure cc:Mr. James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator Region II Oko!$oo$$g PDR

- -. , _