ML20012A058

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Util Intends to Revise Emergency Diesel Generator Bushing Gap Measurement Insp Frequency to Each Refueling Outage in Order to Detect Extruded Bushings & Prevent Generator Failure
ML20012A058
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/1990
From: Stewart W
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
90-105, NUDOCS 9003080214
Download: ML20012A058 (4)


Text

m +

i

.s.n ,

4 . .-

l

, . VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY  ;

- RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 p March 2, 1990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No.90-105 Attention: Document Control Desk NAPS /JHL -1 Washington, D. C. 20555 Docket Nos.-50-338 -

50-339' License Nos. NPF-4 I

NPF-7 l 9

Gentlemen:

-VIRCINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY ,

NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR BUSHING GAP MEASUREMENT INSPECTIONS In late 1984, and throughout 1985, the North Anna Emergency Diesel Generators (EDG's) experienced several significant failures of the pistons and cylinder; liners.. One of the corrective actions implemented as a result of these EDG.

failures was'to perform EDG bushing gap measurement inspections at a specified' interval 'in order to detect extruded bushings and prevent an EDG failure.-

Virginia Electric'and Power Company letter dated March 26, 1986, committed to

-performing EDG bushing gap measurement inspections approximately every 40 ~ >

c hours of EDG operation or every 6 months, whichever occurred first. In our, letter- dated May 7, 1987, the commitment to perform the EDG bushing gap ,

measurement inspections was revised to perform the inspections every 6 months '

in conjunction with normal surveillances. This letter is to notify you that ,

the Virginia Electric and Power Company intends to revise,the EDG bushing- gap measurement' inspection frequency to each refueling outage. A discussion of past EDG failures and-the basis for this revised commitment-is provided in the attachment.

If you have further-questions, please contact us.

Very truly yours, t

- \

! \ '

W -L.' Stewart-Senior Vice President - Nuclear Attachment l'

.9003080214 900302

^, fed /

w PDR GL ADOCK 05000338 PNU a /[/

we n.- ,

m

&pe ..q-..vqe3 7 .~. ,

w+ca s , , s. , - .

1

. o i , ,

,, *: . i , ._ ;. r ;.-

kz S ,

1 4 '[Fje m . g9'\@

Byy ....m d ?.?lr.s ,

@pggg mq pq .1:

W ' c--E ; jl;-s. . ; 3

' ' -J +

, 4-w ;r. ,

o 4

,a ~- .

. z;-

a o . .4 m,. 4

.<.g., .,

Y J~ .y - ;cc:e U.1Sk Nuclear Regulatory Comissions n@

Regionj II-: '

jh i 1101 Marietta Street, N. Wh ,

~i

Suite 29002 .

f[, y"p '

Atlanta ~-iGeorgia,-
30323: , .1

.a e,, ,

.c a'- .

L ,Mr. 1 Lt CaldwelY' ~ 1

~NRC, Senior Resident Inspector d

$3 4 . . North Anna, Power Station, 2!

E.!M.. ,V s,

s ~i et t 4

.,t ,:;f c.s . .t ,

.'{ ,f ,I '

m , -

4 57 h

'7 IE' [t -

n 44 7 N: Y si i

.h -

b' .

L _

i fjf*J . , . - r j

pl 1 > ,-d : ' -

's .

M,

.' :1+

sq', +-.

m q[.  ; 'k ri; ' m,/ ,

(

+ r-t f_

'J,'

.s,-

Q.

O

! b\

4 1 h

r

=*. _ *

' A :_

i 4

.. A f k : I' . i p_'

i-

' I '. ,

o.

.f f

.f,r 4 ,

,S j j l' '

Up' z 1,. .u..

1h y

.a.

[',' 4 o -.

.=

. 4

)

}x ,' k '. -

t'

,sP.3 W '

s s ., ., }

s ;. p.n :n .>

i ~

-\ 11

I f b

t 'r o, i . # $

i :- {._' t i %.) ' .h ;-L -

.2 . -c:.

y: .

5 l - -}-

e t' e )

40 g s 3 l',,.,

s.

) 7 (f ,' '.

m i

. ~;

.,t , , y :.

i I h5 .

p a' S i

?

l ii i

i '? .- -~ L 4 g ;_ 3 k .d f.-

I = ,' c .

s f1

h. a.

[.  !

l i..

f [i. 4 i..

f ..- -

pr <

.4 f 1

,'

2 >

. 4 43 , _ .

r ~

g.=t-,;,, ,

u4

- and gap; reduction -1'si believed!Lto belits run. tim $ accumulated on the Gulf

[' -XHD-40,1ubric'ating oil between November!1985 and' April 1986, b

bl 4 In-1987, the North Anna Unit L EDGs were. overhauled'and the' Chevron Delo-6000 a lubricating l oil'was'Anstalledt

.. . i l -Since. tbegapmeasurementprogramwasinitiated..the1HEDGnumber9 cylinder; bushing has been the_ only bushing degradation observed. The 1H EDG has had 10 -

gap ' inspections, the IJ EDG has had 10 gap inspections,.the 2H EDG has had 8 gap' inspections and,the 2J EDG has had 9 gap inspections. Only one bushing

-wasz ;-damaged by inspection.dueLto the inspection technique. . No other bushing failures have occurred.:

s.- - During the past two'refualing outages the bushings have'been' inspected that'

~P' were exposed - to -the': Chevron Delo-6000 lubricating oil.: All bushings were observedLto be in excellent visual condition and within dimensional acceptance j standards.- ]

i Additional _ factors that. reduce the probability of EDG failure ine'lude improved

-maintenance -and operator awareness, added' detail: and precautions in maintenance- and -test procedures, obtaining a Technical Specifications change reducing' EDG surveillance test loading, reducing the~ testing frequency for  ;

planned: maintenance, implementing a dedicated EDG operator during testing,.

performance monitoringLand testing, and implementation of predictive and preventive maintenance programs.

In conclusion, the current:EDG bushing gap measurement-inspection frequency is. .!

being revised from being performed every. six. months in conjunction with'- i

- preplanned maintenance to'being performed.each' refueling outage. Corrective? '

actions'to support the: revised inspection frequency have been adequately q 1mplemented (as described.above)?and will preclude similar EDG failures.

q l

1

.[

i f

f

, .