ML18153C126

Responds to Generic Ltr 90-01 Re NRC Regulatory Impact Survey.Survey Covers Type of Insp,Audit or Evaluation by NRC Resident,Nrc Regional Ofc,Nrc Teams & INPO

ML18153C126
Person / Time
Site:	Surry, North Anna
Issue date:	03/01/1990
From:	Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
90-044, 90-44, GL-90-01, GL-90-1, NUDOCS 9003090245
Download: ML18153C126 (6)

Text

.

e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 March 1, 1990 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No.90-044 Attention: Document Control Desk NL&P/RMN:rmn Washington, D.C. 20555 Docket Nos. 50-280 50-281 50-338 50-339 License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37 NPF-4 NPF-7 Gentlemen:

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 NRC REGULATORY IMPACT SURVEY As you requested in Generic Letter 90-01, we have completed the regulatory impact survey forms and they are attached. The plant data is per site. Although the survey is to address impact on management, it should be noted that thousands of man-hours are spent at lower levels.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us.

Very truly yours,

.\~\~ l~**-~~*P-.

~uk.__,'

W. L. Stewart Senior Vice President - Nuclear Attachment cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. J. L. Caldwell NRC Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station

( 9003090245 900301 PDR ADOCK 05000280 flOO I P PNU I II

NRC Regulatory Impact Sur~

Questionnaire sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: NRC :Resident

2. 8ased on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this act1v 1ty conducted? _c...,9"'-u~t...,i....nu=o.....u ~ s : . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3. Operations/Construction areas covered: Day to day unit operations

.and outage activities

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 2 people - continuous

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads 10%* (number involved) 10 (2000 man-hr/yr .. per site)

b. Plant Manager - *8%

(160 man-hr/yr -per site)

c. Corporate Department Heads ____ (number involved)

d. Corp*orate Vice Presidents ____ (number involved)

e. Chief Nuclear Officer

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: NRC Regional Office Inspection

2. eased on actual experience over the past several years. about how often is this act1v 1ty conducted? _'[;.,..;w.;ic~e-a.....m~o~n,:;,,;;t;.:;.:h:...*- - - - - - - - - - -

3. Operations/Construction areas covered:

. 4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) One NRC Inspector

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers lllJSt spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Ite11 #1. *

a. Plant Department Heads JP%

(800 man-hr /yr pel;' s:t.tel (number 1nvo 1ved)

-- 4

b. Plant Manager 8%_

{160 man-hr /yr pel;' site).

c. Corporate Department Heads o (number involved) o

d. Corporate Vice Presidents (20 man-hr/yr) 1% (number involved)

--1

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 1%

(20 man-hr/yr)

NRC

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: NRC Team Inspections

2. 8ased on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? one NBC team inspection every two months.

3. Operations/Construction areas covered:

4. Extent of the activity {how many people, for how long) N~C team Jnspections tTqicallv consist of 2 to 4 inspectors who are onsite for one to two weeks.

5. Approximate percentage of total time {on an annual basis) which the following managers IIK.ISt spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item 11.

a. Plant Department Heads 5% (number involved)

• 4-6.

(500 man-hr /yr per site)

b. Plant Manager s%

(100 man-hr /yr per site)

c. Corporate Department Heads Z% {number involved) _1.:--

(40 man-hr/yr)

d. Corp*orate Vice Presidents 2% (number involved) __1 _

(40 man-hr/yr)

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 1%

(20 man-hr /yr)

. \

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: JNPQ plant and Corporate

..EYa 111a ti ans

2. 8asedon actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Once per 12 to 15 months

3. Operations/Construction areas covered:

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) Twenty people

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads~'-- ( number *1 nvo lved) 12 (96'ci man-hr /yr pe:i;- ~ite)

b. Plant Manager 2%

(40 man-hr /yr ~ site)

c. Corporate Depar (960 man-hr/yr) nt Heads 4% {number involved) 12

d. Corp'orate Vice Presidents CL60 :nan-hr /yr) 2% {number i nvo 1ved) 4

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 2%

(40 man-hr /yr)

NRC Regulatory Impact Sur~

Questionnaire sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: N~C - required QA Audits

2. eased on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? ~20-*):..:.:e~r-*~*e;;:.:a~r_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _....;._ __

3. Operations/Construction areas covered: tech spec reauirements

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 2 peoule 3 wks.

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers 1111st spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads :10% (number involved) 10 (2400 man-hr /yr per site)

b. Plant Manager 20%

(400 man-hr /yr, per site)

c. Corporate Department Heads _ _ (number involved) _ _

d. Corporate Vice Presidents _ _ (number involved) _ _

e. Chief Nuclear Officer

- J