ML20064N391

Interim Deficiency Rept Re Use of Ae Design Drawings W/O Consideration of Possible Design Changes.Initially Reported on 820622.Sargent & Lundy Reviewing Drawings to Determine Design Changes to Previously Installed Steel

ML20064N391
Person / Time
Site:	Marble Hill
Issue date:	02/08/1983
From:	Shields S PSI ENERGY, INC. A/K/A PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF INDIANA
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, S-82-15, S82-15, SVP-0010-83, SVP-10-83, NUDOCS 8302160213
Download: ML20064N391 (2)

Text

s -

PUBLIC SERVICE INDIANA S. W. Shields February 8, 1983 Senior Vice President - S82-15 meiear Division SVP-0010-83 3

Mr. James G. Keppler, Docket Nos.: STN 50-546 Regional Administrator STN 50-547 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Construction Permit Nos.:

Region III CPPR - 170 799 Roosevelt Road CPPR - 171 Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60.37 Marble Hill Nuclosr Generating Station - Units 1 and 2

Dear Mr. Keppler:

On June 22, 1982, Mr. T. D. Geib of Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc. (PSI) notified your office of a potentially reportable item as required by 10 CFR 50.55(e). The primary civil contractor, Newberg-Marble Hill (NMH) was utilizing the structural steel fabricator's detail drawings for erection and inspection of structural steel. This fabri-cator had gone out of business and no longer reviewed the architect-engineer's, Sargent & Lundy, drawings for design changes or conflicts.

The NMH quality assurance program did not provide for this review and the potential therefore exists that a number of design changes may not be shown on detail drawings used by NMH production and inspection personnel to erect structural steel.

To determine the acceptability of the structural steel in question, PSI has instructed Sargent & Lundy to review the detail drawings against their design drawings and advise PSI of any changes that might be necessary to bring the previously erected structural steel into conformance with the plant design. To ensure that future erection and inspection is performed in an acceptable manner, applicable NMH procedures have been revised to require the use of Sargent & Lundy design drawings in conjunction with fabricator structural steel detail drawings for erection and inspection of structural steel. Also, PSI has selected another contractor to assume the responsibilities of the fabricator who has gone out of business. This new contractor will be tasked with the responsibility of reviewing future Sargent & Lundy drawings for design changes or conflicts with fabricator drawings.

ff$Yo S

O$

FEB 101983 P. O. Box 190, New Washington, Indiana 47162 812. 289. 3000

. .. . ~ -

h f".

ss PUBUC SERVICE

'" ^"#

' Letter: J. G. Keppler February 8, 1983 S82-15 SVP-0010-83 This letter ie. intended to fulfill the requirements of an interim report as defined in 10 CFR 50.55(e). A further report will be filed on or before June 17, 1983. If you have any qnestions regarding this report, please contact me at your convenience.

Sincerely,

/ / '

L

. W. Shields SWS/LGY/bak cc: Director of Inspection & Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 J. E. Konklin J. J. Harrison

<