ML20195C780: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:"
e-?
y                                                                        Enti 5 perations, Inc.
Ktilona LA 70066-0751 Tel 504 739 6600 Charles M. Duager Vc es c ent Opera'<ans W3F1-99-0095 A4.05 PR June 3,1999 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 j
 
==Subject:==
Waterford 3 SES                                                                                      i Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38 Response to an Apparent Violation in Inspection Report 50-382/99-08 1
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your letter dated May 3,1999, Entergy Operations, Inc. hereby submits under affidavit the response to Apparent Violation 50-382/99-08 identified in the subject inspection report.
Our response includes a previously docketed submittal (Letter WF1-99-0079 dated April 22,1999 as Attachment 2), and a summary (Attachment 1) of our review of the corrective actions described in the inspection report. This summary confirms, with one clarification, the described corrective actions. Attachment 2 addresses the reason for the violation. Attachments 1 and 2 address the corrective actions taken and planned to be taken to avoid further violations. Full compliance will be achieved by June 18,1999, at which time all planned corrective actions will be completed.
9906080304 990603                                                      /                          I PDR    ADOCK 05000382 G                    PDR
 
V  ,
4' Response to an Apparent Violation in Inspection Report 50-382/99-08 W3F1-99-0095 Page 2 -
June 3,1999 If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact''
Early Ewing at (504) 739-6242.                                        l Very truly yours,
        . h / ll1          y C.M. Dugger Vice President, Operations Waterford 3 CMD/GCShtk Attachments cc:            E.W. Merschoff (NRC Region IV)
C.P. Patel (NRC-NRR)
J. Smith N.S. Reynolds NRC Resident inspectors Office
 
1 i
4 l
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                l In the matter of                          )
                                              )                                            I Entergy Operations, Incorporated          )      Docket No. 50-382                    {
Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station        )
AFFIDAVIT Charles Marshall Dugger, being duly sworn, hereby deposes and says that he is Vice President Operations- Waterford 3 of Entergy Operations, incorporated; that he le duly authorized to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the attached Response to an Apparent Violation in Inspection Report 50-382/99-08 that he is familiar with the content thereof; and that the matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
b/)      i
                                                    //( W                        -
Charles Marshall Dugger                0i Vice President Operations- Waterford 3 STATE OF LOUISIANA                  )
                                        ) ss                                              l PARISH OF ST. CHARLES              )
Subscribed and swom to before me, a Notiry Public in and for the Parish and State' above named this      7tJ day of          b1 m -                ,1999.
(/
                                                                                        ~L O y;    n-        r d~                J Notary Public My Commission expires d /$
 
.1 Attachmsnt 1 to f                                                                                  W3F1-99-0095 i                                                                                      Page 1 of 2 ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. REVIEW
 
==SUMMARY==
OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS i
CORRECTIVE ACTION 1 DOCKETED IN INSPECTION REPORT 50-382/99-08                            1 The licensee's corrective actions included immediate retraining and counseling of the access authorization personnel who were involved in the failure to review and consider the information.                                                              ,
REVIEW
 
==SUMMARY==
 
          ' Entergy confirms the occurrence of retraining and counseling of the access authorization personnel who were involved in the failure to review and consider the information. The individuals involved were interviewed and expectations were reinforced regarding the appropriate actions that should have been taken during their
            -review. In addition, the Site Human Performance Coordinator debriefed the              -
individuals involved in the failure. These actions were completed on March 31,1999.
CORRECTIVE ACTION 2 DOCKETED IN INSPECTION REPORT 50-382/99-08 All licensee access authorization personnel were retrained prior to the completion of the inspection.
REVIE'N
 
==SUMMARY==
 
Entergy confirms that the licensee access authorization personnel were retrained prior to the completion of the inspection. A memo dated March 31,1999, was written and distributed to section personnel concerning the expectation to review all            ,
information contained in a folder prior to signing it.                                    '
CORRECTIVE ACTION 3 DOCKETED IN INSPECTION REPORT 50-382/99-08
          ' The licensee also planned to brief and train all Entergy access authorization personnel on the incident during annual training.
REVIEW
 
==SUMMARY==
 
Entergy confirms that the Entergy access authorization personnel will be briefed and trained on the incident during annual training. The upcoming training is scheduled for June 18,1999.
 
i Attachm:nt 1 to I
- p.                                                                                W3F1-99-0095    j
,f                                                                                      Page 2 of 2 l
      ' CORRECTIVE ACTION 4 DOCKETED IN INSPECTION REPORT 50-382/99-08 F >ior to the end of the inspection, the licensee initiated a revision to Entergy Corporate Security Departmental Procedure CS-DP-104, Revision 0, to strengthen the requirements involving the review of all background information.
l REVIEW
 
==SUMMARY==
 
Entergy did not initiate a revision to Corporate Security Departmental Procedure CS-DP-104, Revision 0. However, Entergy did initiate a revision to procedure Corporate Security Site Procedure CS-WP-AA-101, to strengthen the requirements involving the review of all background information. The revision, which became effective on May 14,1999, emphasizes the need for persons approving unescorted access forms to perform a comprehensive review of allinformation in an applicant's folder and ensure adjudication of any derogatory information.
CORRECTIVE ACTION 5 DOCKETED IN INSPECTION REPORT 50-382/99-08 Finally, the access authorization staff reviewed approximately 800 access                  I authorization files.
REVIEW
 
==SUMMARY==
 
Entergy confirms that the access authorization staff reviewed approximately 800 access authorization files. A review was conducted to include the backgrounds received on over 800 workers granted access during Refuel Outage 09 in-processing to ensure no other folders included derogatory information that had been overlooked.
The review was completed on March 26,1999, and did not identify any other folders where derogatory information was not adjudicated prior to unescorted access being granted.
O
 
t ATTACHMENT 2 TO W3F1-99-0095 0
                                                            .}}

Revision as of 21:17, 16 December 2020

Submits Response to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/99-08.Corrective Actions:All Licensee Access Authorization Personnel Were Retrained Prior to Completion of Insp
ML20195C780
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/03/1999
From: Dugger C
ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
50-382-99-08, 50-382-99-8, W3F1-99-0095, W3F1-99-95, NUDOCS 9906080304
Download: ML20195C780 (6)


Text

"

e-?

y Enti 5 perations, Inc.

Ktilona LA 70066-0751 Tel 504 739 6600 Charles M. Duager Vc es c ent Opera'<ans W3F1-99-0095 A4.05 PR June 3,1999 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 j

Subject:

Waterford 3 SES i Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38 Response to an Apparent Violation in Inspection Report 50-382/99-08 1

Gentlemen:

In accordance with your letter dated May 3,1999, Entergy Operations, Inc. hereby submits under affidavit the response to Apparent Violation 50-382/99-08 identified in the subject inspection report.

Our response includes a previously docketed submittal (Letter WF1-99-0079 dated April 22,1999 as Attachment 2), and a summary (Attachment 1) of our review of the corrective actions described in the inspection report. This summary confirms, with one clarification, the described corrective actions. Attachment 2 addresses the reason for the violation. Attachments 1 and 2 address the corrective actions taken and planned to be taken to avoid further violations. Full compliance will be achieved by June 18,1999, at which time all planned corrective actions will be completed.

9906080304 990603 / I PDR ADOCK 05000382 G PDR

V ,

4' Response to an Apparent Violation in Inspection Report 50-382/99-08 W3F1-99-0095 Page 2 -

June 3,1999 If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact

Early Ewing at (504) 739-6242. l Very truly yours,

. h / ll1 y C.M. Dugger Vice President, Operations Waterford 3 CMD/GCShtk Attachments cc: E.W. Merschoff (NRC Region IV)

C.P. Patel (NRC-NRR)

J. Smith N.S. Reynolds NRC Resident inspectors Office

1 i

4 l

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l In the matter of )

) I Entergy Operations, Incorporated ) Docket No. 50-382 {

Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station )

AFFIDAVIT Charles Marshall Dugger, being duly sworn, hereby deposes and says that he is Vice President Operations- Waterford 3 of Entergy Operations, incorporated; that he le duly authorized to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the attached Response to an Apparent Violation in Inspection Report 50-382/99-08 that he is familiar with the content thereof; and that the matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.

b/) i

//( W -

Charles Marshall Dugger 0i Vice President Operations- Waterford 3 STATE OF LOUISIANA )

) ss l PARISH OF ST. CHARLES )

Subscribed and swom to before me, a Notiry Public in and for the Parish and State' above named this 7tJ day of b1 m - ,1999.

(/

~L O y; n- r d~ J Notary Public My Commission expires d /$

.1 Attachmsnt 1 to f W3F1-99-0095 i Page 1 of 2 ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. REVIEW

SUMMARY

OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS i

CORRECTIVE ACTION 1 DOCKETED IN INSPECTION REPORT 50-382/99-08 1 The licensee's corrective actions included immediate retraining and counseling of the access authorization personnel who were involved in the failure to review and consider the information. ,

REVIEW

SUMMARY

' Entergy confirms the occurrence of retraining and counseling of the access authorization personnel who were involved in the failure to review and consider the information. The individuals involved were interviewed and expectations were reinforced regarding the appropriate actions that should have been taken during their

-review. In addition, the Site Human Performance Coordinator debriefed the -

individuals involved in the failure. These actions were completed on March 31,1999.

CORRECTIVE ACTION 2 DOCKETED IN INSPECTION REPORT 50-382/99-08 All licensee access authorization personnel were retrained prior to the completion of the inspection.

REVIE'N

SUMMARY

Entergy confirms that the licensee access authorization personnel were retrained prior to the completion of the inspection. A memo dated March 31,1999, was written and distributed to section personnel concerning the expectation to review all ,

information contained in a folder prior to signing it. '

CORRECTIVE ACTION 3 DOCKETED IN INSPECTION REPORT 50-382/99-08

' The licensee also planned to brief and train all Entergy access authorization personnel on the incident during annual training.

REVIEW

SUMMARY

Entergy confirms that the Entergy access authorization personnel will be briefed and trained on the incident during annual training. The upcoming training is scheduled for June 18,1999.

i Attachm:nt 1 to I

- p. W3F1-99-0095 j

,f Page 2 of 2 l

' CORRECTIVE ACTION 4 DOCKETED IN INSPECTION REPORT 50-382/99-08 F >ior to the end of the inspection, the licensee initiated a revision to Entergy Corporate Security Departmental Procedure CS-DP-104, Revision 0, to strengthen the requirements involving the review of all background information.

l REVIEW

SUMMARY

Entergy did not initiate a revision to Corporate Security Departmental Procedure CS-DP-104, Revision 0. However, Entergy did initiate a revision to procedure Corporate Security Site Procedure CS-WP-AA-101, to strengthen the requirements involving the review of all background information. The revision, which became effective on May 14,1999, emphasizes the need for persons approving unescorted access forms to perform a comprehensive review of allinformation in an applicant's folder and ensure adjudication of any derogatory information.

CORRECTIVE ACTION 5 DOCKETED IN INSPECTION REPORT 50-382/99-08 Finally, the access authorization staff reviewed approximately 800 access I authorization files.

REVIEW

SUMMARY

Entergy confirms that the access authorization staff reviewed approximately 800 access authorization files. A review was conducted to include the backgrounds received on over 800 workers granted access during Refuel Outage 09 in-processing to ensure no other folders included derogatory information that had been overlooked.

The review was completed on March 26,1999, and did not identify any other folders where derogatory information was not adjudicated prior to unescorted access being granted.

O

t ATTACHMENT 2 TO W3F1-99-0095 0

.