ML18139B448

Forwards Supplemental Response to Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-280/81-11 & 50-281/81-11.Scaffolding Immediately Removed & Piping Examined to Ensure That No Damage Has Been Incurred

ML18139B448
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	06/03/1981
From:	Sylvia B VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:	James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18139B447	List: ML18139B448 ML18139B449
References
278A, NUDOCS 8107240379
Download: ML18139B448 (2)

Text

.. ',

• e e  :  : , '

• I **, -

OFFICIAL CO:P~

~/:}

VIRGINl:A. E:tECT_R~C;~N:>> POWER COMPANY

, I R:rcHMoNn,V:r:aoINXA- 23261 t 1i *.June J-_; *:1981-- . -;

t.; ., i *i 1_* ' l... : d t,j Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Serial No. 287A Office of Inspection and Enforcement NO/RMT:ms U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket Nos. 50-280 Region II 50-281 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 License Nos. DPR-32 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 DPR-37

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

In reference to the telecon of May 19, 1981 between Mr. W. P. Kleinsorge and Mr. J. L. Wilson, the attached information is being provided as agreed upon.

This information was unintentionally omitted in our letter of May 22, 1981, Serial No. 287. The information contained in the attached pages is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Very truly yours,

µ4;L~

B. R. :7sylvia Manager - Nuclear Operations and Maintenance Attachment City of Richmond Commonwealth of Virginia .-re-<{

Acknowledged before me this 3 day of';-~,__,-, 19_{/

r-(

,/'

... *}-\_............ _ ,_ .  !.i\ .' ~*-

Notary Public My Commission expires: ~ - "l..  ::_ 19 :') >

SEAL cc: Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing

• ( 8107240379 810701 r

I PDR ADOCK 05000280 G PDR

\

. 'I e

~ .*

Attachment Page 1 SURRY POWER STATION RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION APPENDED TO INSPECTION REPORTS 50-280/81-11, 50-281/81-11 The following information is provided to amend and clarify the Vepco response to:

Non-Compliance Item 280, 281/81-11-01, "Failure to Establish Adequate Controls for Protection of Equipment" VEPCO RESPONSE

1. The item as stated is correct.

2. REASON FOR VIOLATION The scaffolding in question had shifted during use and, as a consequence, has come into contact with some Category I piping that the scaffold had been erected around. The scaffolding was correctly built, i.e~ it was not hung from the piping, but it had moved during use to touch the pipe in question.

3. CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH HAVE BEEN TAKEN AND RESULTS ACHIEVED The scaffolding was immediately removed and the piping examined to ensure that no damage had been incurred. The contractor was instructed not to rig from piping systems or to install scaffolding such that it could contact . equipment or piping. This was accomplished during the NRC inspection.

4. CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATION Surveillance is conducted on a daily basis to ensure scaffolding has been properly installed.

5. DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED Full Compliance has been achieved .