ML18081B176: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I --UNITED STATES_£NVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION II 26 FEDERAL PLAZA NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10007 MARS 1 1993 William H :. Regan* Acting Assistant*
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES_£NVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION II 26 FEDERAL PLAZA NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10007 MARS     1 1993 William H :. Regan*
Directer for:
Acting Assistant* Directer for:
* Envirohmerit  
* Envirohmerit *Projects : *
*Projects
* Division of Site;*. Safety: and
: *
    ** Erivirohmental A.naiysis Office. bf Nuclear Reactor Reg'ulation
* Division of Site;*. Safety: and * ** Erivirohmental A.naiysis Office. bf Nuclear Reactor Reg'ulation
* 1
* 1\ u .s.
\ u .s.
* Nuclear. Reglllatory.
* Nuclear. Reglllatory. Commission
Commission  
  'Washington, D. c :.
'Washington, D. c :.
* 20555i '.
* 20555i '. *


==Dear Mr* .. Regan:==
==Dear Mr* .. Regan:==
. We have. reviewed*
We have. reviewed* the* docuinent
the* docuinent
* entitle:d* ."Assessment of tl:ie* *rmpacts :of. tl:ie*
* entitle:d*  
* Salem and Hope cr*.eek. Stations* on* Shortnose
."Assessment of tl:ie* *rmpacts :of. tl:ie*
* Stl1rgeoi1, 'AC:ipens*er* *brevirostttim, 11 prepared: by. Drs .* M .* Masnik .and J. *Wilson. We had minimal comments :on* the* '.
* Salem and Hope cr*.eek. Stations*
subject *.docuinent;. :the'se were discussed' with:i:nenibers' of your* staff <1.nd were ..
on* Shortnose
easily*resblved... Overall" we find. this :docuinent *to :be: a complete :and thorough .
* Stl1rgeoi1, 'AC:ipens*er*  
summary. of all available *information on the* shortnose *sturgeon* in the* Delaware.
*brevirostttim, 11 prepared:
* River .. After careful. review, we find. that we concur* with:'your* conclusion *
by. Drs .* M .* Masnik . and J. *Wilson. We had minimal comments :on* the* '. subject *.docuinent;.
. that II. ~
:the'se were discussed' with:i:nenibers' of your* staff <1.nd were .. easily*resblved  
... Overall" we find. this :docuinent  
*to :be: a complete :and thorough . summary. of all available  
*information on the* shortnose  
*sturgeon*
in the* Delaware.
* River .. After careful. review, we find. that we concur* with:'your*
conclusion  
* . that II.
* the'. continued operation of Salem Uriit l, *the future. operation of Salem
* the'. continued operation of Salem Uriit l, *the future. operation of Salem
* Uriit *2, <1.nd. the. construction and operation of Hope Creek. Uriits "l and 2," . located in Salem County;* State '.Of New :Jers.ey:, *on the'. eastern shore .. bf the* . Delaware River, . will not jeopardize'.
* Uriit *2, ~ <1.nd. the. construction and operation of Hope Creek. Uriits "l and 2," .
the* continued:
located in Salem County;* State '.Of New :Jers.ey:, *on the'. eastern shore .. bf the* .
existence'.
Delaware River, . will not jeopardize'. the* continued: existence'. bf Acipens*er ..
bf Acipens*er  
. brevir'ostrum LeSueur*,. the* shortnose *sturgeon,. a feclerally*recbgnizetl
.. . brevir'ostrum LeSueur*,.
* endangered. species*. 11 :
the* shortnose  
As you know, in .time the* EPA will be required'. to '.judge the* adequacy of 316 (a)*
*sturgeon,.
and (b.). demonstrations. submitted for: the*se
a feclerally*recbgnizetl
* faGilitie:s *. * *The'. question of possible ".
* endangered.
impacts :upon the'. shortnose *sturgeon population pursuant to :the* Endangered .
species*.
sp*ecies*. Act '.is' .likely* to '.resurfac:;e* during* each. bf the*se
11 : As you know, in .time the* EPA will be required'.
to '.judge the* adequacy of 316 (a)* and (b.). demonstrations.
submitted for: the*se
* faGilitie:s  
*. * *The'. question of possible ". impacts :upon the'. shortnose  
*sturgeon population pursuant to :the* Endangered . sp*ecies*.
Act '.is' .likely* to '.resurfac:;e*
during* each. bf the*se
* dete*rininations.
* dete*rininations.
Because we: acknowledge:
Because we: acknowledge: joint sponsorship of this NRC report, :we will *con-*
joint sponsorship of this NRC report, :we will *con-* sider. it to :represent . our" mutual policy in the'. inatter .. *Unless *significant new . information to :the*. contrary is :brought.
sider. it to :represent .our" mutual policy in the'. inatter .. *Unless *significant new .
furward, *EPA foresees'.
information to :the*. contrary is :brought. furward, *EPA foresees'. no* possibility" that our policies will diverge: in the*. future from those bf l.')TRC's .in this* matter.
no* possibility" that our policies will diverge: in the*. future from those bf l.')TRC's .in this* matter. 800$110
800$110
, .. 2 *. We are pleased to -.cooperate  
 
-.with. 'you in the development and review of this Division}}
, .. L~ *~*-
2 *.
We are pleased to -.cooperate -.with. 'you in the development and review of this Division}}

Latest revision as of 08:56, 3 February 2020

Concurs W/Nrc Conclusion That Facility Operation Will Not Jeopardize Continued Existence of Shortnose Sturgeon
ML18081B176
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/05/1980
From: Moralessanchez
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
To: Regan W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8003110592
Download: ML18081B176 (2)


Text

UNITED STATES_£NVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION II 26 FEDERAL PLAZA NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10007 MARS 1 1993 William H :. Regan*

Acting Assistant* Directer for:

  • Envirohmerit *Projects : *
  • Division of Site;*. Safety: and
    • Erivirohmental A.naiysis Office. bf Nuclear Reactor Reg'ulation
  • 1

\ u .s.

  • Nuclear. Reglllatory. Commission

'Washington, D. c :.

  • 20555i '.

Dear Mr* .. Regan:

We have. reviewed* the* docuinent

  • entitle:d* ."Assessment of tl:ie* *rmpacts :of. tl:ie*
  • Salem and Hope cr*.eek. Stations* on* Shortnose
  • Stl1rgeoi1, 'AC:ipens*er* *brevirostttim, 11 prepared: by. Drs .* M .* Masnik .and J. *Wilson. We had minimal comments :on* the* '.

subject *.docuinent;. :the'se were discussed' with:i:nenibers' of your* staff <1.nd were ..

easily*resblved... Overall" we find. this :docuinent *to :be: a complete :and thorough .

summary. of all available *information on the* shortnose *sturgeon* in the* Delaware.

  • River .. After careful. review, we find. that we concur* with:'your* conclusion *

. that II. ~

  • the'. continued operation of Salem Uriit l, *the future. operation of Salem
  • Uriit *2, ~ <1.nd. the. construction and operation of Hope Creek. Uriits "l and 2," .

located in Salem County;* State '.Of New :Jers.ey:, *on the'. eastern shore .. bf the* .

Delaware River, . will not jeopardize'. the* continued: existence'. bf Acipens*er ..

. brevir'ostrum LeSueur*,. the* shortnose *sturgeon,. a feclerally*recbgnizetl

  • endangered. species*. 11 :

As you know, in .time the* EPA will be required'. to '.judge the* adequacy of 316 (a)*

and (b.). demonstrations. submitted for: the*se

  • faGilitie:s *. * *The'. question of possible ".

impacts :upon the'. shortnose *sturgeon population pursuant to :the* Endangered .

sp*ecies*. Act '.is' .likely* to '.resurfac:;e* during* each. bf the*se

  • dete*rininations.

Because we: acknowledge: joint sponsorship of this NRC report, :we will *con-*

sider. it to :represent .our" mutual policy in the'. inatter .. *Unless *significant new .

information to :the*. contrary is :brought. furward, *EPA foresees'. no* possibility" that our policies will diverge: in the*. future from those bf l.')TRC's .in this* matter.

800$110

, .. L~ *~*-

2 *.

We are pleased to -.cooperate -.with. 'you in the development and review of this Division