ML20093D346

Provides Further Update to on Status of Offsite Radiological Emergency Preparedness of State of Nj for Responding to Accident at Facility.Remedial Action Schedule for Deficiencies Cited in Rev 2 of 840312 Rept Encl

ML20093D346
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	10/04/1984
From:	Krimm R Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	Jordan E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
NUDOCS 8410110209
Download: ML20093D346 (27)

Text

m '

i, Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 GCT-4see MEMORANDUM FOR: Edward L. Jordan Director Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission FROM: frrh 'K i Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Programs

SUBJECT:

Status Update on the Offsite Radiological Emergency Preparedness of New Jersey Relative to the Salem Nuclear Generating Station The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a further update to our August 30, 1984, memorandum on the status of offsite radiological emergency preparedness of the State of New Jersey for responding to an accident at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station.

Attached is the remedial action schedule for deficiencies cited in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region II Post Exercise Assessment (Revision 2, dated March 12,1984). This reflects the latest status of the continuing negotiations between the State of New Jersey and the Regional Assistance Committee (throughFEMA). As we mentioned in our previous memorandum, many actions are being coordinated with preparations for the October 23, 1984, full-scale exercise at Salem. The final verification of the completion of remedial actions will be made during the exercise itself. This is the primary reason why, although a State response may be adequate, actions are termed incomplete in the last column of the schedule. The completion of a few other actions is contingent upon FEMA's receipt of appropriate plan revisions. At the present time, the State plans on submitting revisions in the next few months.

Finally, some items have already been tested in a medical drill which was held on September 27, 1984. The evaluation of this drill will be included in the report on the October 23, 1984, full-scale exercise.

In addition to some completed items highlighted in the August 30, 1984 memorandum, you may be interested in several others which have been completed or clarified since then. Although problems with bus driver availability are not anticipated from the New Jersey Transit Authority, New Jersey State Police enlisted personnel 8410110209 041004 -~~~'*

1/l j 1b.L PDR ADOCK 05000272 jg 3 \

F PDR

,g

.t c e a

"'u'.- <

_g_

will serve as drivers, should any problems occur. Although plan revisions .nust r be checked to see that they reflect this additional level of back-up support, training in exposure control procedures for the police was held on September 28, 1984 l

. FEMA has also been informed that New Jersey Transit is in the process of  ;

equipping its buses with radios. Until this is completed. the State Police l will continue to escort the buses. The current estimate for completing the  !

installation of radios in the buses is September 1986 The contract for the i statewide system is now scheduled to be awarded by October 1984, with an 18- E month installation period and a 3--6 month test period. '

FEMA Region II has requested further clarification-from the State about the inventory and the procedures for distribution of dosimeters to congregate care shelters and Salem County bus drivers. However, it is FEMA's belief that the State of New Jersey is making satisfactory progress in addressing i deficiencies previously cited in assessments of past exercises.

I hope this information has been helpful. If we can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me or Robert S. Wilkerson, Chief, Technological Hazards Division, at 287-0200. We will, of course, send the Nuclear Regulatory Commission a complete report on the October 1984 exercise and September 1984 '

medical drill as soon as possible.

Attachment As Stated .

I l 9 4

(

m >

c 4

l'  !

t

, I l

.w - -

= . . . - . .

~

october 2,6, 1983 P se 1 o e C e

, Q~

-e 4

u

~ . -

.  :: :S - .

3l .

US  !.N SEI**

gag m., a esan Carrective Acties State (S)/ County (Q 3eeposee (Acr10N) 202 FDWL Evaluetten of State /Comty Boopease Mj

1. State of Eew Jersey .

1. N PCF redte operatee did est ne BEF is aware of this probles and will 9/20/84 The response is generally acceptable. A 1 E.1

. elesye indicate that the t reme- stress proper radio procedures during thei r Bowever, provide a course description eteetens were port of the eser- pre-exerciae trat=1ne of all DEF emergency . prior to the training. By 10/f/84 pro-cise. h pCP redte operator response permaaaal on 9 9-20-84. vide an atteadaare list'. In addition. ,

eheeld almore teclade "thie is a the state has informed the BAC that the drill..." to the tremeeteeleme. .

checklists referenced ta #5 are also etesiptog pertinent here. Provide these checklist 6 Pertape robber the to the RAC by 10/J/84. - Actual perf or-teforeetten en the mesesse form =mara of the operators will be verified will ashamee the tremesteeten of, at the next exercise. .

this iafermettaa.

E.5 2. Core should be takes to hose the :he State CD1 will coordinate with the 10/23/84 The response is acceptable. Procedures A I stres somed hefere the SBS to Salem County CEN to insure that there will have been provided. However, by 10/5/84 ,

ecttweted. A precederst ~ cheese be a gap of at least four minutes between provide revisions,to both the ERS proca-t w iring that, prior to. Es$ , ,the stres sounding to the actual ERS dure and 30P503, indicating that there vi 1 be a gap of ag least four minutes betwee actisettee. the commty emergency . ara =Armat. i

! assagement coordleator estify the* the siren soundtag-and

~

the actual ERS br >ad-state that the strees had semeded cast. Actual timing of the sirens and E G would ensure the timely sequese- will be observed at the ne.t exercise.

I tog of alerttag and settricettee. .

4.a L h recetwer le the secc une est the State CD1 receiver can pick up the EES The satellite stations brande==t the ses -

A I seesitive samede to pick up the >ra=Ar==t f rom the satellite stations.. sage for the first tm.r af ter an eser-Ess teet meessee. h SEDC has to the signal of Philadelphia radio cise activation of the ERS system.

eheeld obcate a receiver seest- Leation. IL3 cannot receive the signal fras Federal observers will verify whether time enomsk to pick up the Ess ;he primary ERS station. this is being received la the SEOC.

? .teet aneeege. .

t

- 5ALEN mr' m 4. Net. mat tam. ha

• a ause e.As,au.&bt.-masu.p*me aw a m*.s Q t .-

, October 26, 1933 -

! Page 2 eft

^

q- O i

' ,a - ~3 S.

3: *31 age - .:

g~g e

3. 3. 5 ;-[.

Mg i

State (S)/ County (C) Response.(MTICBl), o HMA Evaluetten of State /Commty Response 3dC W a*1em Corrective Acties-A l

' PSE & G is lastalling a hard-copy datar 10/23/84 The response is A p te. Federsi observ- -

I ars will verify the adequacy of the BAF's

~

Suplieste esplaestione of plant transmission system with drops at the , ,

l F. led 4. State EOC (0perations Amm and Accident receipt of data at the next e::ercise.

! '@.4.J evente, corrent esteerelegy, and Assessment) and BRF Meacep&arters to insurs l - dose projection checks to SRP accurate and timely passaga of plant in-

! I re delayed. Precedures for the I prompt receipt of such data by formation. PSE & G has indicated that the ,

l' =

BRP headgeseter sheeld ' he system will be in place and operational ,

i improved. by.10/15/84. h State O m will provide a syetaan description to FEMA upon i'.s receip t l

I 'F.1.4 S. Motification of emergency pts. fr' he ut i y. ggf -

10/23/84 Provide the procedur'al checklists by A 1 t 0.4 3 tective settees was not always Th has ic that procedural relayed to the . field teams' checklists for operations and communicatie se 10/f/84. The state has.Als'o advised us l will.be in place for the 10/23/84 exercise that the courses referenced in i 1 are

.Specifically, the order to .

i j avecuate wee met tremenitted. (See emelosed letter and attachments). , partiment here. Provide a course descrip -

Protective action notification tion prior to the training and provide must he relayed to the field an attendance list by 10/5/84. h capa-bility to ta'easait protective action i teses. Such notification weeld .. decisions to tb4 field teams will be

+ eid the teams is knowing which.*

j

• evacuatten routes are in use

• verified at 'adier next esercise.

l

. better enabling thee-te move free c,_____q . ,

assigneemt to assisament.

A 1 Th M *di" **"iE*** **** 1d*'* oPora- :ompleted the response is acceptable. At the next F.1.4 6. andte esamenteettene between the tional communication 8 problems on a segula r exercises federal observers will evalusta

f. . pCP and sti of the field monitor.

basis to assure performance. However, the the effectiveness of radio c.oemunications

! ing teses - should be assured. Problem in Vanguard-A team communicatans between the FCP and the field ten.ms.

l Radie egetpoemt should be evale. did not W ar overall response since.the i sted and improved to elimieste *

• *******#Y '*' " "'** ""* ** *I* ,

j ditficulties th mainteining con- the Vanguard-E team. It should be strMac .

tact with the Vaaspaard-A tese. that only one (1) of aine (9) teams was 1 ~

j . ,

• affected.

t;

• 1 .

i 4

4 4

1 i

A l

i e

i a

i

. --- . . . . ~ .

4  ;

Octeher 26, 1983 i

reen 3 et af 2 C*

a g S .e. -.

.. 2*3

- . :ga: , y et v * * . - 8 3,T

- -8

.  %"g o be -

I State (S)/Ceesty (C) Response (ACTION) $8I FEMA Evaluettee of State / County Emepease Ijj 3

j gac mm.a====d=*1ee Cortsetive Action '- Although the utility believes they followed" 4

c rrect Procedures, sne state matatatas that g g th*7 k*"" th*7 "are act pToperly notified The Licensee has concluded that it foll d ! by 4 - 51.e 7. The Bar was est notified of the proper procedure. D e State cannot concur the licensee of the Alert notification, aad therefore .that escalaties of the plant emerginc7 since*there is no record of the Alert noti :e BRP was not notified, because there is n(entry in tt e State action level (EAL) f ree oneemal .# in the. State Police Commamications Bureau Police Communtentions Bureau log. .This. touever, dosa not prows the State a paint because if the call vesl received is the OgM 1 event to etert. The- BRF was' log-(see attached log sheet).

' uneuere of the ebenge estil it there presumably would be no ertry in the8 subject los . By eestacted the ettlity appreat ' The Licensee did change its backup notifi- 10/5/84, provide reviseid procedures to aspute that outly the e notely 30 minutes . after tlEn cation procedure (via 882-2000) to insure 8Ppropriate individual receives notificauton calls f the I cheese. The plea previsions for that the a;.oununicator establishes contact autility.- At the next exercise, federal servers wi i confiru j motifytag esch . response orgseisa- uith the Bureau Shif t Supervisor (Comuni- Iwhether notification calle from the atil yarepropjelyhandle the plaat ECL meet be cations Sergeant). by OEM and wheth' e r CEN makes proper moti cation calls to BRP.

A I the New Jersey Transit drivers will be LO/16/84 the MJ Transit drivers will receive train-k Lug on 10/16/84. State Pakice. who will

i0 8. De bee drivere had me treintas trained by the State RADEF Officer in the irive the evacuation - buses if necessary J 4.4 in radiettee reeerd keeping er me of dosimetry, exposure 'cantrol proca- (see #11 below). will receive traintag on knowledge of esposere centrol dures and the use of Kl. (See attached

[ precedures. No doetenter cher- training schedule and K1 Procedures.) D/28/84. Provide course descriptions by gere were eve 11able et the mee-LO/p/84. Prior to 10/23/84 provide list *

{ '

The bee drivere af those who attended the course Federal j tering potet.

sheeld receive further trotning abservers will vert,fy the drivers' capab1 Lities j

in redtelegteet espeeere centret. regarding esposure control at the next am arcise, ,

i 41so, the State has indicated that the stiargers

}

are distributed at,the terminal and are mat i

required at the mustering point. 1 10/23/84 'rovide revised proc.edures which reflect A.

j

h. Very little dose projection, plant The BRP has been apprised of this situs-i . 8 :his new information flow by 10/S/84. A1 60

condition, or protective action infor tion and will endeavor to keep the FCP his should be included in the DEP traini ng .

mation was tran==f tted Lack to the- better informed. The BRP has indicated en Sept. 18 and 20th. Provide course descriptions l

} 3an-PCF from RRP headquarters. More that the PCF will receive information

,and a list of those who attended each cou se by open exchange of data and information directly from the expanded Accident Asses -

. should be maintained between BRE ment team at the IDF during the 10/23/84 .0/f/84. Federal observers will evaluate the J quality of information received at the FC' at

" headquarters and the BRP-FCP. exercise.

.he next exercise.

4 i ~ .

I s -m i

e i i 4

l _ __ _ _ _ _ _

.-=*y .o.-. ..

• - lm: . . . . . '

g.,,M._

• *

• g .g;,.. ei. Osteher 26, 1983 ... 8...:'- W 9 '<f.} ".- .. ,,2.. . . .n q .

• . i-iN;-)p.QyMeq'-h{,{,

M: . W::.'if.v. ?; . ..j.6,,4

• .' '. -Q's # - ?.-Q.' < g :k . . am* . Vu.,.,o.

..Y..*.., h,.t:.e

-..u..'..W.;

.. ..s..~ ~~:~r

.. + 4 . i. u-4 -

. - p ,,.ty ...r~~

n .

tt

'k%g..i , . . peg.s, 4.:.L" .:; *dp

+

r,

.: ::.'::5-: .O.:.g: n s  %:,:%... .,,;;. .g.y'::  %  :,. .4i%:.a* . ~ .n .. c., . Y

- mp: : ? .R# 4.%D; m.Q.% ,.%...;... ,. +.:;&.;

p. .

. ~ w.. .v.;g ywr g .:4 -p. g..:':.;. .. q 9:t, *.' n f ;;.. e v: r :-Q.Q:g m t

. .1 v. ~J

-- -r y.e .. 333 , ,

3 ;; .- ,lt, 8.:

1 4 2~. -

- I. 3. 3' **

=

State (S)/ County (C) Easponse (ACTION)

$p2 .

FEMA Evaluatten of State / County assponse MI

?

BAC m.,ha*1em Corrective detion .

A I MJ Transit bus drivers will receive trais-I k

le. Reproper lastreettene and troia- See iten 8 tag on 10/16/84 State police, who are

!J.301s the back-up drivers (see #11), will re-I tag howe.been given resseding the

! sothertsetten and administratten ceive trainias em 9/28/84. Provide comest ,

t of EI to emergency has drivers ' sescriptiana by 10/g784. Provide atten-have been mode. Iepreved. pro- fence rosters prior to 10/23/84. Also, j K1 distribution proemaares have been

.cadures sad training are restuired for the use of radioprotective D'amitted. At the next esercise, federal i

drugs by emergency workere. observers will verify whether the bus i

' trivers know El proce'dures, i A I 1 .' .

h State of New Jersey OEM and New Jersey Completed he stated la t$s EAC's 8/1044 ' review of the Salen plan revisions, the statement

J.10 4 11. MJOEM and EJ Transit should finalize Transit have finalised as MOU. A copy was

• A.3 a MOU regarding the availability of La the MOU that "MJ Transit will aske eveny

, provided to FEMA on February 29, 1984. affort to provide buses and drivers" is

! buses. (Copy Enclosed). Should any problems a-rise in driver availability, this functice not sufficient. Assurance must be given that.MJ Transit will provide the necessar) j i .

d will be fulfilled by New Jersey State nases and drivers. Also, by 10/J784, pro-Police enlisted persommel. ride's plassrevision regarding the role of 1

,. the State police' As back-up drivers. l' 1

• A i

12. There is a need for improved coordi- The State OEM is initiating a complete re- 10/23/8I4 kaf t procandares have been provided. Pre- l j J.10 3 ride complete (procedures to the EAC upos vision of the RERP Plan on June 1, 1984 :ompletion. Federal observers will eval- l

. nation between the MJSP and NJ TransW with an estimated completion of September during exercisde is executing evac- . ate coordination between the MJSP and BJ uation of the general public. Proce- 28, 1984. New Jersey Transit has been transit at the next exercise.

instructed to revise its ammes and proce- " ~

dures need to be clarified betueen dures as a part of this revision. The NJSP and MJ Transit designating lead l  ; ,

and dispatch responsibilities for State OEM will assist and advise New Jerser l'

+ Transit as necessary to accomplish their

. evacuation buses. . revisions prior to the 10/23/84 esercise.

(See Ate =ehad Draft Procedure). i l

! i t i

! i

- - i i

i e i

! i l

i t 1 .

I t 1 ,

l l

1 l

i

_ m . . . . . .. . _ _

i I *

• SAIJN NUCLEAR CDIERATING STAT 15 tM.mCabt,-atas.uana, aa.a aama ..

{

October 26, 1933 -

-.**..j,; [ I,5

,.

• t

.s :-: + -

. j

, c.... .r.. .

.- . Page sg

=

. .v . . n ygg. l 3.

g .

'v -

• ~

10 .e" og

• • "5I kE4 G E. :

IIS -

$3 RAC harian Corrective Action State (S)/ County (C) Response (ACTION) $ 0 8. FEMA Evaluation of State / County asspsame Q ~I . IO

{ EU '.. n.

i i

.T.11 13. No messages were posted in the accidens .The BRP will be advised to improve post- 10/23/84 OEM posting procedures have been submitt. A I assessnest area or the SE0C regarding ing of pertimant sctions taking place in ed. By 10/s; advise whether Bar was i i the field. The State OEM will assure that advised to improve posting and provide

a protective actions implemented for the ingestion pathway. Protective the necessary infocustion is passed to . BRP poeting procedures. At the maxt actions implemented should be clearly , Accident Assessment when the State IOC is exercise. federal observers will verify l

l posted on the status boards and maps. in operation. (See Attached Procedure). whether protective actions,faciuding those for the ingestion pathway. are posted in the accident -

• r-- t area 4

and in the SEOC. . .

i  ! .

r i -

g .

8 i

+ # *e

. e i .

p, .

N j

i -

1 i

i.

I 1

1 a

o October 26, 1983-A Page 6 of 3,C

$ C S 5" C*

10 *3 4 j = .

3A .g ."I4!. 1 32 1  ! st l

• 223 la ta g ig RAC hart == Corrective Action State (S)/ County (C) Response (AcrION) E62 FEMA Evaluatica of State /Comty asepease yI

' F. I .a 14. Commsnicattees capability between New Jersey Transit is in the process of to Complet The RAC endorses.the approach outlined A I in Colonel Pag no's 9/6/84 letter, of 4

- the NJ treesit dispatcher and equipping its buses with radios. Until' Lon Date evacuation besee is lacking. NJ this is completed, the State Police will tvailable equipping the potential evacuation buses tremeit busee should be equipped continue to escort the buses. The current first. By 10/5/84, advise the RAC of a with radios. The lateria use of estimate for equipping New Jersey Transit . tentative installation schedule based on 1 state pollee escort vehicles buses with radios is 9-86. The statewide this approach. At the next exercise, should coattame until the radice system will go to bid in 9-84 with approx- observers will evaluate tne interia use i are testa 11ed. .

instely 18 months installation and 3 to 6 of state police escort vehicles.

l sonths test peuiod. (Based on conversatios

11. Emermency Operettons Facility with New Jersey Transit Southern Division. - - .

i Deputy General Manager Roy Thomas on .

! J.1Ess 15. New Jersey moes compees sectors' B/28/,84). (See Attached Letter). ,

1 to define protection action i areas, wheroes PSE&C designates PSE & G passes information on the plume The state has indicated that PSE & C now A I EPAs. State and utility.repre. affected area to the State OEM using com-l uses compass sectors in communicating with ODt. By'10/5/84, provide revised 5

sentatives should agree ~ en a pass sectors. The State OEM then converts

!  : single e thod for areas where '- these sectors to the associated evacuation PSF. & G procedures to that effect. Also .

! protective actione may be.imple '. planning areas. This did not present any the et, ate has fadicated that they currently

, g.g, .- aperational problems during the exercise. utilise both EPA's and compass sectors, but

• - that this may change as a result of an oagoing 3

111. Joint Meus Center and Publie revision of the evacuation model. By 10/5/84, 1 Education provide a schedule for completion of the

, .s revised evacuation model.

i At the next exercise, federal observers i

will verify whether PSE & G conveys data utilizing compass sectors. Also, it will l

be observed whether OEM's use of both l .

. compass sectors and EP A's is effective.

e i

4 1

saws aw r- uws.- . . . . . . . . _ . . . _

october 26, 19g3 Pasa 7 of "2.$~

n A C E

5." c-

~3 i a it

..EI I- .  :

. III I. UES('

State (S)/ County (C) Response (ACTICII) E6E FEMA gvaluation of State /Ceimbty Beepense y "I 30go BAC Recommendation Corrective Action 3400 A I

16. PWblic inferastian meterials have The licensee has mailed public informa,tioi10/23/84 Several positive steps have been taken

.Cols materials to the EPZ residents. In order regarding public awareness. The public

.been developed indicattag evacua-i C.2 to assess the level of public awareness information brochures were distributed tion routes and the locattom of the state and licensee are conducting a February 7-10, 1984. NJ0Dt has also in-congrestate care centers. These dicated that a public inform tion placar l asterials have not been distri- survey among the EPZ residents. The

• state is developing a RERP program which for transients will be distributed prior l beted by PSE6C due to printing to 10/23/84. In addition, a slide pre-problems. Distribution of public will be presented to EPZ residents and sentation is being developed, a survey i s information inferming'.reefdents groups. The thrust of the program will be to emphasize the proper steps to take being conducted to measure the level of t of protective actione should be in an emergency and an overall awareness public awareness, and public information continued. In addition, of the NCS and the offsite public safety road signs will be installed. By 10/5/86, information sheeld be dissee . plans. The state has ordered the printins please advise the RA0 when the slide pro-insted to those locations where of transient placards to be posted throus t- gram will be ready and provide a schedul a tranetents utsht het e.g., Sales out the EPZ. (See Attached Card). The for presenting it throughout the EPZ. ALao ,

L Colf and Country Club, and the by 10/5/84, inform us when the survey vi L1 be Sales Meter lodge.

• placards will be in place prior to the -

,10/23/84 exercise. The State further completed.

l . '

. intends to order and have installed road ., .." .

signs de' signed to direct transients to Further publicitoformation efforts are

.f'

• 3

• listen to the designated EBS stations encouraged including the use of TV, radi )

during emergency or exercise situations, and the' print media. Federal observers l This will be accomplished during FY 1985. 'will interview residents, transients, ani business people at the next exercise to gauge the effectiveness of the public information compaign to date.

i Residents of Sales and Cumberland See item 16. See above.

C.1, _17.

Counties must be made aware of pro-A I C.2 -

- tactive actions to be taken during

,a radiological emergency.

4 4

4 i

. m.. ., --- m.. - ..~ ..

October 26, 1983 Fege a f tr O ,

i 7" nD a ** S.

I

,a '

• • 3 -.

3 8 3..l . E ~"g

&~b.

o I

g State (S)/ County (C) Response (ACTI(si) $0$ FDIA Evaluation of State / County Response yE lU g es4 m 2 EAC ma- M ation Corrective Action I*

10/23/84 By 10/5/84, provide the RAC with the A sales county The Sales County Coordinator has been i

4 IV,

18. The SCg0C emergency settwities apprised to expand the county staff and. :ounty's plan for remedial actions. The

i .4 state should assist the county in this ta ik.

M were not always well integrated to involve more elements of the county uso, by 10/5/84, provide an assessment o f l

and the appropriate organisatione government. The importance of the action efforts to increase participation. Inclula were not consistently favolved in was enforced at the bi-monthly state /countr decioton-making. A more, effective meeting on May 16, 1984; at thisimmeting a copy of the Freeholder Director's lette r which was not attache including the county and manicipalities were in- the state's operations training course, maassement system structed to provide the state with a plan september 21-23, 1984, should stress the better information dieseminettoe for remedial actions. The Couaty EMC has management techniques in which the SCEOC .a among the staff and better use of indicated that the Freeholder Director for seakest. By,10/5/84, provide a course l staff resources should be pro- leseription and an attendance roster with vided. Sales County will endorse additional par- *

• ticipation in a letter to all County re- agency affiliations. .

19. The esenty 30C did not have se sponse organisations prior to the 10/23/84 Le the next exercise, federal observere 1

emersency log, and the accident exercise. (See Attached Letter).

claestfication and the protective '

till evaluate the effectiveness of the y iCEOC. .

" action in effect was not listed on the EOC states board. - Not all si ,

T6e state will review the county proca- 9/30/84 Revising the procedu"res and providing A I asseages were posted. Maps yere d4res and recommend changes that should training *(as disctissed above) are appro-not always used to plot informs- . priate steps toward iqproving the o re-tion. The county toc should have be made in logging and posting. He stat't tion of the county EOC. .By 10/5/ in-emersency and the will forward revised procedures to FEMA. .

an log, The State OEM has arranged a meeting for form the RAC regarding the results of th t

, accident cleostficattor. sed the 9/13/84 with the Salem Dec to assure 9/13/84 meeting and provide revised pro-protective action la effect cedures, as appropriate. At the next l should be Itsted on the goc affective utilization'of the new County 1

EOC. This meeting will also be used to exercise, federal observers will evaluat i i status board. All messages whether there has been improvement in th t ehould be posted. Maps should be review the County procedures manual to assure that checklists cover those areas operation of the county EOC.

used to plot information.

j found deficient in prior exercises.

3 i

4 .

i 3

October 26, 1983 e

Page 9 of (

- Q E c g Se c4

.3

~3 ee

i. t. y u , y3 Nk gg f gag an -==daries corrective Action State (S)/ County (C) Resposee (ACTION) jl 8 2 FEMA Evaluaties of State / County pleeposee hI The American Red Cross (ARC),'the lead 10/23/84 The meeting with the ABC is scheduled for A -1

! 9/19/84 (af ter several postponements due

b4 W. The Sales Cemety eengregate care agency for congregate care, was advised to ohelter should he able to demen- expand staffing for congregate care shelters. to heavy storms). The meeting should re-l

! etrate semagement capability ever the Regional ARC representatives will be sult.in a comunitment to designate and train a preteeged perled. An assistaat scheduling a meeting to discuss this issue an assistant manager in time for the next er standby shelter annager should and additional training. FEMA will be ap-- exercise. By 10/5/84; inform the RAC about i

te designated and trained. prised of the meeting. (The ARC meeting the resulto of the meeting. At the next a

has been scheduled for 9/19/84 and will in- exercise, federal observers stil verify 3.2 21. Activettee of the 48 treffle con- clude State OEM representation to assure whether there is management capability

]

trol point see neither staulated thatthisissueisadequatelyaddressed) for a prolonged period. *

' nor demonstrated. h ability to activate traf fic c.entret pointe Traffic control will be demonstrated in e LO/23/84 The upcoming exercise will d - = trace A 1 should he tested tu future eser- conjunction with municipal and county oper s- che response to impediments to evacuation eines. cions necessary to deal with FEMA initiated with attenient traffic control.

impediments to evacuation during the 10/23/84 F 22. The sales Cemety congregate care exercise. .

ohelter wee not well-informed of the state has purchased radios for each 9/28/84 The response is acceptable. Bowever, there A 1

'l the progrees of the esercise, er / congregate care shelter. The State OEM should also be., training.

• A troising schedule I -

opprised d h and W amey

• will review the county's procedures and coverihg this, issue shod 1d be provided by

* " "* insure that provisions are instituted to 10/5/84 Also, by,10/5/84 advise the RAC

,g ,g - gg .

inform the shelters. Revised procedures of the outcome of your review of the pro-

!' ohould keep the esegregate care sill be forwarded to FEMA should the need cedures and provide any necessary revisiome.

i ehelters up-to-date and advise for such procedures be identified. This At the next exercise, federal observers l l them when an evacuaties has issue vill be addressed at the 9/19/84 will verify whether there has been improw e-b gue, t evacuees can be RAC meeting. ment in keeping the congregate care shalter i

j espected. and hour enny evacuees informed of the progress of the szercise.

I are involved. -

l l

1

) .

l -

1 .

4 i

i 1

=s_

.m. ..._

SAtEM NUCLEAR GEusaattau wr-a sun u . .

October $6, 1983 4 .

FeSe 10 of IE4 t n n o a 3o G"

. ll e.j ~3

it 3

ag, 1 32

$ 3 -

I. e Y$3(

j State (S)/ County (C) Esopease (ACf!ON) $ 8 PEMA Ewaleetice of State /Cosenty Beepease BAC h aies Corrective Action A '.I The county will be advised to send its 7/15/84 The state has indicated that the new EOC l n = nications officers to the July train- was partically activated 8/31/84 and wil Felsh 33. r iestfees within the SCROC e be fully operational prior to the Octobe r i

telepheme ing course at Rutgers. A new phone systes A new phone system is being j .

more limited and w ill be implemented when the county occuptn a exercise.

installed. Also, two county personnel

' traffic did met flow essethly. its new EOC. (See itse 19).

Sales County should consider more attended the consuuications course.

j space to secommodate se efficient (See attach-aat.)

j placesset of teleM in the At the next exercise, federal observers

SCE0C. h comety e,heeld slee will evaluate the county's capabilities j eensider Septementies a mer* in message control and telephone traffic of factive telephone useeage ese- gloe, .

trol system to feellitate the, ,-

flow and use of eastgency inforesties. ,

A I

See 18 and 23. At the next' exeref oe,

F.1.4 24. E1'elaboro, Meanimates,* end See Ites 23 and Iten 18. .

federal observers will evaluate whether j Quintes reported that requeste the SCEOC has improved its capability j

for teforestion and other sosist- y .

to respond to.the municipalities.

i .

anee free the SCEOC did not always ,

receive a prompt, reopeneet , - ,

s l

Implement a procedure for more j

efficient reopeasee by the SCEOC #

l to regeests for inforestion and .

~

assistance to local EOCs.

l

~

i t . .

l i ..

i j

i J

1 i

1

j . October 26, 1933 I

1 f Page 11 of L 4 a i n0 C 1 g 5. C-i u >

..}

3J: Sj- 'a 33

?} &g: E- 48*[g 1

'gl gag an -- aatia= Corrective Acties State (S)/ County (C) Response (ACTIGI) sC O 2 FEna avslaation of State / County Beeposee Mj ,

dna s

4 h county procedures for internal com- 9/28/84 By 10/5/84, provide the revised procedura s A I

. C.3 IS. Briefing procederes at the SCROC munications will be reviewed and revised for internal communication. This'is in

! were set oefficient er timely and accordingly to improve the flow of infor- addition to the ROC moeual preytausly sub-j ,

the public address system wee not nation to staff members. (See Item 19 and sitted. (The referenced Conmusication e- ie= tion Procedure.)

4 eseoistently aseed to nettfy staff Procedures are not relevant to the issues i e2 the emergency attesties. . of EOC internal briefing proceduras and i Sales Cemety should review use of the public address system.) The j internal comumseteattens with the DPerations training, September 21-23, 1 inteet of improvingt briefing pre-

• 1984, should also address this issue. By t eedores and eensisteet 'une of the 10/5/84, provide a course description and 4

public address systes te notify an attaadaaca roster vitin agency a,ffilistLons.

l the staff of changes in the, Pederal observers will evaluate briefing >rocedures aul

! emerSeacy claselfteetles level.

• the use of the public address system at tse next esascise.

l Ce7 '26. The appropriate equipment for the state did provide adequate instrumen- :ompleted the state has informed the RAC that tho' A I

i. moeitettag vehicles wea, not tation for monitoring vehicles. All decon- equipment was g,iven to the county but that available at the decentamination timinattua facilities are provided with the county did not distribute it. There-center. The decentaminetten "Luipment needed to perform their function, fore, the State has indicated that this year center sheeld be equipped with

• (See enclosed list of equipment and proced ires.) they will assur,e' distribution at the 10/13/84 e11 asemesary radielegical. . secontamination-tosining session. Also, the moeitertag devices ta ' effectively enclosed' list has the right type of equipment.

perform their fumetion. 4t the next exercise, federal observers uL11 rerify whether there is appropriate equipment j L13 :27. The redtelegical moeitering -, it the deconta=faation center.

! . egetpenet at the Sales Comaty the State Radiological Officer (SRO) has 5/30/84 6dvise the RAC, by 10/5/84, what measures i I I congregate care shelter had not seen advised that instruments at the shalt er are.being taken to assure that the calibtsted j been calibrated within the poet ,ere not: calibrated. A schedule for calib ation year. Ege1pment should be Lastruments are distributed to the shelter locations.

, ,e included in the FEMA / State Comprehensiv< t Le the,next exercise, federal observers wLil verify

, calibreted at the tium intervele 'boperative Agreement. However, the SRO ahether the radiological monitoring equipment i -

recommended by the supplier. ,ndicatps that properly calibrated instruerats uwt been properly calibrated.

! i iere in the SCEOC but not distributed to

) -.he shelter locations.

i i

i l

l i

k i

l t

I i

k

October 26, 1983 a

1 ' Page 12 *f 22 I n

t eC Q

5. C" E

..y 73 in Sj, 1 *A u 3A 2. 4 48'g

• 3 E State (5)/ County (C) Beepense (ACTION)

E]2 FgMA svaluettee of State /Csenty Beepense

$U BAC h eion Corrective Action '

Mone of the training courses appear to I I i

K.3,c 28. Although the state indicated that The county bus drivers will be included LO/2/84 cover the use of dosimeters by county bum in training program for exposure control distribatten had been ande, (See training schedule.) drivers. By 10/5/84, establish a date l Radielegical espesure centrol for such training and provide a course l declasters were not isoned by the . description. Following the training pro-County for the bus driver in. vide an. attendance roster with agency volved in the eveemetten of affiliations. By 10/5/84, provide the trenett dependent- individuals. RAC with revised procedures which assure Moreover the driver appeared to - the proper distribution of dosiasters.

have had me training in the mee also, by 10/5/84, respond to the BAC's of doetmeters. Radiological question in our 9/3/84 letter requesting espesure centrol doetmeters and . clarification as to who the sounty but training in their ese is required drivers are, and under what cirematance.s for personnel involved in evacue- ' they are utilised. If appropriate, pro-

' ties busing. -

wide an MOU..St.the next exercise, feJer al

~ observers will evaluate the county bus drivers',knowledgq'of expospre control.

. . , f.,

K.3.a {29. At the 5A traffic control point. Police officers will be provided training 10/2/84 Police officers widsbe trained on Sept. A

" 1 exposure control. (See training 28th. By10/5/84,provideacourse j *hf r 1pd t a schedule.) description and an attendance roster witl, control points should be equipped

• agency affiliations. The contea should J . with personal dosimeters and should  %,

cover distribution as well as use of be trained in their use, dosimeters. &y 10/5/84, provide revised i procedures which assure the proper dis-I tribution of dosimeters. At the next exercise, federal observers will verify whether police officers have dosimeters

• and whether they are knowledgeable in J, their use.

4 l

i i

f l

1 l

1

.= 4 -- ; *ida.i" lw'. ;.: w % . ,. .

~,,gg'.SIg

- /"- .-

2. 5!*.TW. #f 9'Ef v;g * . SALDI NUCLEAR CDIERATING STATICII EXERCISE-RDIEDIAL ACTtumb

• • (* Yk. .[$*[ .-i. dll p[' r M

.),. . -

f.i

~

[h. ,.-_!. ' hf.. ... ,h,w. .-hhi;.

. ~. .

. ,.. y- , ,. , . ,- . ./ r.

g.

1 .. (, ,g.,

u tp. s -.. . S.s .

4

?,. . , . '- .

.s -

.c.

Q,;s cT;s.

.- -q. n ' . .

,s

• .'r

• • O

^

ra

- A k *.-[,

,s

' * ' ,%E'g,;@.7.'t

.- .rw. ?.3.

., )-$rd

• '4 !' i ,

.. )?.U.2

. . , . '[  ;

g

., .y s

-. - we QP G l o >- u w

=o ~e ~

een

. ou oua e u ee .e, o- .e.

,s

• o.

o a

E new es.a- go -c :

.I

• State (S)(County (C) Response (ACTIoli) $ $ FDtA Evaluation of State /unasty Besponse **I as l m 30f eoc IU RAC Recosuseadation Corrective Action as < u l

i K.3 30. Bescue squad personnel need additional the State will purchase additional self- 10/23/84 sy 10/5/84, advise the RAC as to the \A g

,a self reading dosimeters. An adequate reading dosimeters for all responsible current status of the dosimeter purchase.

eupply of self reading dosimeters is , organizations. This purchase was initiated' Also, advise what asamures.are being takes .

1 required for the rescue squad. Jon 3/28/84 for 500 0-200 at dosimeters. to assure distribution to rescue personne, The State expects these to be in place At the next exercise, federal observers f will verify whether all appropriate

, prior to the 10/23/84 exercise. (See j Consignment Forms and Purchase Order). emergency workers have, dosimeters.

4 i

i L , , .

1. p

)

• a .'>

I 1 4 1

1 E

l a

e i

k i

1 .

1 i

i l

• sAsJet mucttaa t.amanas asa, aa - - ~ - . - . . . <

• ' ' cetsber 26,1983

,e.e u of a l C e 2* nt*.

8 se

.: 3r

., is  ::1 ,

gl

$1: . 81 =a g

$U BAC Wettee Corrective Action State (S)/ County (C) neopense (ACTION) M O s1 FEMA Evaluation of State / County temposse  %

4..

~

l C.3.e St. h reemmet at the Sales Ceum y See' Item 30.

• By 10/5/84, advise'the BAC as tc the .

A I decentaminettee center were not current status of the dosimeter p.archase

provided with pereenet dest- Also, advise what maass.res era being talu a I

metere. Werkere et the decem- '

to assure distribution to the Salem Couni y teatnettee center should .he decontamination center. 'At the next exe1 cise, j oopplied with posesent deet- federal observers will verify whether voi kers

seters. - at the Salem County decontamination cesta e j

' have personal dosimeters.

I * *

",* , , the state radic1cgic.a1 officer will con- 9/29/84 Salem County decone==taation training is A I duct decaer==ication training. This will scheduled for 10/13/84. Prior to 10/23/44

}' did not knew the contaminetten . include knowledge of contamination threa- provide a copy of the attaa4aara roster level for deterstates the need sholds. See attached schedule.- with agency affiliations. At the next I

' for decontaminettee. Emergency exercise, federal observers will verify-workere eheute recetue additteest det er congregate care workers are well training on contamination.-level ' "#* ** ** ""*" """' **

for deteretning the 'need for j -

l decentaminettee. .

• f -

R ,.,

j .$.a 33. hroennel at the decentamination See Item 32. See Item'32. ' A I eenter did met know the centent-

• nation level for decentaminetten.

'Addittenet traicing should he "'

I . provided for decentaminettee -

4 eenter personeel who are l roepenetble for determining .

! whether emergency field workers 1

seed to be decentenineted. . -

i ,

1 i

i -

I l

4 1

4 I

l

~

. . Octeher 26, 1983 Pas) 15 of g 3

qO C' 4 8 we C" e.]

it -

'*3

. 82 3y 4 3*

8t* R. ,  :: 8 A R i I 1

R mac - 1 correceive decian state (s)/cmenty (c) neepene. (acrim) A: 8 A mia avsluettes et state / county neopense jj gg E.5.c 34. The heepital had see imetroment rhe state Radiological Officer and the' 9/27/84 Provide course descriptione and atten- 1 1 L.I evellable for radiotegical BRP have conducted training at Sales . dance restere with affiliatione for all 2

moeitering and the available llospital. Additional training will be pertinent trainias by 10/5/84. There etaff did met dessentrate given to bospital staff in area of de- is no indication what measures are being i

i adequate kaentedge of eentamine- contamination an health physica. (See - taken to provide additional rediological I tien legele. Available writtee attached schedule.) An updated medical monitoring equipment. At the 9/27/84

} precedures were not referenced. training schedule was forwarded to FDIA medical drill, the federal observer will 1 Respital staff enehere regelre by letter dated 8/23/84. verify whether eguipment is available anI eddittenet redselegical monitor- -

whether the staff is adeguately trained.

l * *

ing egetpenet. Ptsether, the

• I staff regelree additional trat a-- .

l ing for deteretning the need for

) decontamination.

i E.5.a 35. The heepital staff did met!desen- rhis has'been included in the exercise 9/27/84 Monitor and decosta=ination of an an- A I 4jectives approved by FDIA as of 8/14/84. bulance and its crev vill be demon-i; L.I strate monitoring and decenteet- ,

strated and obsgrved at t>e medical matten of tIw- enhulance and ite .-

staff. The asetterinig and, drillme9/27/34.

. decontaminetten of the ashutance '

and crew should he demonstrated '

in a future emeramecy drill. ,

j i .

l .

t i .

i -

1:

f 4

i i

1 1

- - _ . _ - - - - . . - - - - - - - - _ . . - .-- _ ~ _ . . _ . . .

estater.26. 1ses Page'16 of g

].

Q a

~Q* . ,J5 i g *: So.

1 2 31 -

.

e o e nas

d. er e 3 $2 es!-

g:

i

Sec Escoe sensation Correettwo detian State (S)/ County (C) Beepnee (ACT1cu) E s1 FEMA Evaluetten of State / County Beepomoe yj i

Utility assistance is available for off- 9/27/g4 gy 10/5/54, provide course descriptions A I

l E A heenth phystetet use not site accidents when these are not concur- and attendance rosters with affiliations

, L.1 i . eve 11eble to hoopttal staff root with on-site emergencies. The utilt: y for all pertinent training. At the ' l

? doctog the essreise for eensel- has a contract with Radiation Management. 9/27/64 medical drill the federal observ- .

tatten. Recesse this see se off- Company of Philadelphia for consultation. er will evaluate whether the SOet staff site meeteest, a heelth physicist The training outlined la the State's is capable of independent radiation l emergency response.

would hoge to be seguired free 8/23/84 letter to Roger Eowieski is de- .

Philadelphia, apprestentely 30 signed to fully prepare the S00t staff foi' sinutes suey. Salem Cemety P' ;- "-t radiation emergency response.

should restes the asettability of l

health phyeles esperttee for .

andteet support and consider the, .

see of utility assistanee with >

off-site accidents.

s

% Sel'em cemety Monteiselttles.

All auaicipalities were advised at the ' 10/23/84 Progress has been ande on this issue. A I May 16, 1984 State / County meeting to re- Nowever, the stat;e has not forwarded the i A.R.e *37. A 24-heer es11 list for sec e referenced municipal remedial acties schasule.

A.4 etaff teg was met eve 11able se the *. spond to the remedial actions. The sche- This should be forwarded by 10/5/04 alona l  ! Moentesten BC. A 24-heer call' dels will be provided to the state on '

May 30, 1984 and forwarded to FEMA. Each with a copy of Maaspington's 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> es11 j

list should be propered and

• list. Also, by 10/5/84, provide a trainams >

used. Soffisteet emergoecy municipality has designed their emergency response organisation to fit the availa- schedule, including course descriptions, for [

l

, resposee persement ehem14 he bility of emergency workers. The public Mannington personnel. Following the traiming l

- recruited and trained to provide and prior tc 10/23/84 provide an attendarce roster i

! contiemous emergency taformation survey referenced in Item 16

! 244eur identified approximately 80 individuals with affiliations. All individuals on eta 24-hour respeese aperations. call list abould receive trainias and therefore theil- f willing to volunteer as emergency workers names should be on the attendance rosters indicating Their names and addresses have been pro-

!

• vided to the County Coordinator for dis- they have received appropriate training. At the next i - semination to the municipal OEN's. Since exercise, federal observers la Manningtoe will verif: ,

j the previous exercise, Mannington has ap- whether there are sufficient trataed personnel and i j whether a 24-hour call list is being util ise4.

1 pointed a new Deputy EMC and a full Emersiacy Management Council. They have assured th<t State

) OEM that a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> staffing pattern will le in l l place on 10-23-84. (See Attached Letter) .

}  !

i f .

i I

3 l l s

1 b

i I

i i"

i

~ _ . - .- . - ---.

October 26, 1983 ,

4 J Page 17 et 2;

') -

. p ,-

=

y y

]

.3 *3

• 3 Se

. 18

~

in .g 32

. . gfu o

e me - Ea g ,

i i

BAC Becosamedettee corrective Action State (S)/ County (C) Response (ACTION) E62 UEMA Evaluation of State / County Resposee Q The State OEM requested a meeting with the 10/23/8dBy 10/5/84, advise whether progress has A LI j .

Elsinboro Township coordinator and govera- been made in improving the level of par-

2.s M. The Elstabove 30C asede to ticipation. Also, by 10/5' provide course i leprese their participetten ing body to discuss corrective measures.

levels, infermetten managemmet, This meeting was held on 8/20/84. At that descriptions and attendance rosters with 1

1 and coordinetten of protective meeting, Elsinboro agreed to provide two affiliations as well as any required charsea (2) people for the Operations course on - in EOC operations / procedures. At the nemc i actions. A system to taprewe the exercise, federal observers will evaluate I Eleinhere participettes levels, 9/21 84 and two (2) people for the

informatien management, and co._ Casamunications Course on 9/19/84. They the effectiveness of the Elsimboro EOC.

' ordinetten of protective accione also agreed to review their EOC operations with the State following the Operations ohemid-be developed. -

l Course and make necessary changes. Howevar,

39. As e useelt of the 1981 emeretee, . Elsinboro expressed some wonder at the -

D.3 Prios; assessment since the yederal observec -

I postero displaying the corrent emermeecy eless were prominently did not spend any significant maount of cima in their EOC.

displayed in meet WCo. The I' - Elsiehere noC did not dispfer er ,

the State OEM will provide training to the 10/2/84 By 10/5/84, provide course. descriptions A I prope meee to . is BOC .' as wel4 as attepdance rosters with affili-should post sad use the reistred . -Elsinboro cations Township and expopurein operations, communi-control. The state ations. The stata.has indicated that

! posters lacluding states hearde, will also provide additional EAL posters. they have provided addittomal posters to l the plane EpE, papelstion distri- (Completed) See attached schedule. Elsinboro. Federal observers will verif) 4 botica, avecastica restes, eccess uhether Elainboro utilises the required

, ,,,g ,,g ,,g,g, ,,g ,,g,,,gg,, posters at the next exercise.

! . ,,,g ,,,

the State OEM and County ODI have develop- CompletedProcedural checklists are f=Med La the A I 064 40. M eat checklists were not j moed at the Elstabere 30C. procedural manuals for all EPZ municipali- municipal procedures manual. Also, the i se e Procedural checklists,eheeld be ties. *Elsinboro's is included, of checklists should be included in the cperations course discussed in f's 38 and 39 and shculd be l designed and used.

• included in the course descriptions when these are forwarded to the RAC. If appropriate, tt is issue sh mild j be included in the submission of changes in EOC oper itions/

procedures discussed in #38. At the next exercise, federal observers will verify whether procedural checklists tre l

i being properly utilised.

I l

l i

i 1

-~ *- October 26, 1983 4

Page 18 et g J O E

5." C*-

10 .. *:

gi 2 ::

u3 g {, ,.g :g gg g .

SAC W =*ies Corrective Acties State (S)/Cseunty (C) Response (ACT10M) U 8 FEMA Evaluation of State / County keepense M"I U Mo(d v

1 The State ODI will provide Elsinboro Tcm- 10/23/84 By 10/5/84, provide a course description A I

ship with communication training. (See and an attandmaea.roeter with affiliation i.

s F.3 41. The Elsinhere 50C staff lacked attached schedule and Item 38.) 4t the next exercise, federal observers seen of the aseeseary training to sill evaluatte Elsimboro's e - =1 cations

< perform all et the correct coe. 28pability.

semaicettoes precedures. Elsin- ,

i' bero 30C staff members who are

• reopenetble for septementing' the i regelred commentestion precedures

should ettend training seestems. ,

L3 42. A security progree mes not in til EPZ municipalities were advised to en- 10/23/84 sy 10/5/84, advise the 1AC regarding the A I j place at the Elsinhere tec. A' sure security measures are in their EOC's. status of providing photo identification j security system sheeld be the State OEM has made provisions for pic- :ards. Also, by 10/5/84, indicate what -

developed at the Elstabore 90C. ture identification cards for all respond- training will be provided, including era through the Sales County OEM. However , ,

ourse descriptions. Following the train -

,I .

~

the necessity for security should be judge'l Lag, and prior to 10/23/84, provide

,, an a cese by case basis in relation to the attendance rosters with affiliations. Thi 4

area and organizations involved. (Sea security .proced.afes have been provided.

Letached' Procedure). iovever, by 10/5/84, provide a revised 3rocedure indicating that individuals seeking access to the EOC will be monitor -

)

l d and that gone aniaated individuals will

>e prohibited from entering. At the next 1

i - axercise federal observers will evaluate lsinboro's security measures.

i i

i l

i i

)

i 1

e k

Y .

NNNIf*1.$,

- SAlm NUCukR CENERAftMC' STAT 10N EXERCI$2-RMEDIA1,~ACTIum1

$ D'd " " .C october 26, 1ssa .. . ,7 ,; .

q q a y$ g$.N [ I N 3: [' . 7mw. ;p..

. . . N,; $ ,

~ ~

v.; 9,1 fy9y v > .. , . , g.g ; y,,,

- t.n .m ;..u.. .

- - .~

~

==

2' C'-

(

?. j?4  ? ':

l State (S)/ County (C) Response (ACTION)

$8E EIMA Evaluation of State / County Response y *3 - C 30 48 E RAC Recoussendation corrective Action a X-4

43. The Penneville BOC is too ==all for Pennsville Township was apprised to s[nek 5/16/84 The state has indicated that they advised I 1 i

1.3 effective operation. Consideration larger ac M ations for an EOC. It was Fenneville at a 5/16/84 seating to seek )*I should be given to relocation of the noted that other municipalities have done ' a larger EOC. Provide,a status report 4 Fennsville IOC to a larger facility. so and the state will provide funds for on e.his situation by 10/5/84. Federal i renovations. observers will evaluate the adequacy of the IOC at the next exercise.

4 E.3. a 44. Inadequate supplies of dosimeters were The State OEM is purchasing additional 10/23/84 The purchase order r range dosimete :s. I g i E.3. > observed at Elsimboro, and Pennsville. self reading dosimeters. The county will By 10/5/84, advise the RAC of the current j Self-reading dosimeters of both low- be advised to insure that this equipment status of this purchase. Also, by 10/5/8>,

range (0-200 mR) and intermediate- is delivered into the field. (See attached inform the RAC what measures have been rang's (either 0-5 m or 0-20 R) purchase order.) . taken to obtain additional high-range i

sensitivity and a permanentiecord dosimeters (they do not use intermediate 4 device should be provided to all ,.

range) pod per=aa- t record devices. In

emergency workers. - addition, by

10/5, provide a status re-port on the delivery of this equipment to Q field loca'tions (including but not limited to Alsinboro and Penneville).

i I Target dates should be provided if delive 'y

- has not been made yet. As stated is our j

9/3/34 letter: "If appropriato, provide

^

a statement that there will be sufficient I ~(i.e., in accordance with plan require-ments) low-range dor.'. meters, high-range

- dosimeters and permanent record devices oime I

• the referenced purchase and distribution ,a completed." At the next exercise, federa .

I observers will check on the adequacy of equipment at all locations in the EFZ inc .uding

}, ,

Elainboro and Pennsville.

i 4

?

l 4

h 2

.* e. .

October 26, 1933 Page 20 of

. s

~

n a Q* n

.3 "3 3

" , 333 A .*

83: 3 ,r ""{ }

"1 RAC m., w =rion Corrective 5ction State (S)/ County (C) Response (ACTION) 1"I o

$08

n. .

FEMA Evaluation of State / County Response o er e y "E w

$0 W U e14 0 he Cotrity Enc was advised to keep the 10/23/84 The Dec was advised to hold more frequeni. I ,1 D,3 TI. Cumberland comett EOC staff apprised of events through more briefings. However, it appears from the frequent briefings. The Cumberland Count: ' course description that training in brie: -

. A.1.4 45. The EMC beld brieffens of the DC has indicated that updated county and ings was not covered at the July e-m-A 2,a staff only taftequently. ';1ee EOC municipal procedures manuals will be in icaticas course. Therefore, such trainiiig staff would benefit free periodic place for the lo/23/84 exercise. The .

should be covered at the operatione cour:,e .

briefings and status updates.~ Commmunications course of 7/13 - 15/84.was By 10/5/84, provide a course description completed by two (2) representatives each and an attendance roster with affiliatioius .

from Sales and Cumberland County. (See It should be noted that ,the procedures

. Attached Class Roster). identify briefings as a continuous funct on .

M 's should be stressed at the upcoming operations course. .

. Some instructions in the municipal manua .

. are directed towards county personnel.

By 10/5/84, prov$de a corrected municipa .

J .

== == a 1 .

.- At the next exercise, fed'eral observers will e'valuater'th,e adequacy and frequency

, . of briefings. ,

d

'*~

. . .a . -.a .: ._. ,,: . .: , *. .. .-

" Q, ~ Q :} ~ O * '- --

,i - 2: . ' p .. ,. 7. .

SALM NUCLEAR C S ERATING STATION EXERCISE-R WEDIAI. ACT1cus i

t* /. 3 ,. G october 26, as sa g~;3<

q ,

. sq.1

,'.. .* ,_.,.u.' c -:. . .+ .'

. . ;:5, i

.' . . . f..;c ..;

, .- a@7 .. %. - . : ,.

M.e , . -

".c. .;.3-..y- t;.W. Mg:r."

?

N.. m.' :.,a,.*

,. .;,.; j .. '. . ..

.~

s y .-

z. < 1 . Page21eg

' ~

. . ?sE*E3 p

~

g ' k."

e

[

[

30 O 3* g3& 4 52 et* m&4 o State (S)/ County (C) Response (ACTION) e' 0 A EDTA Evaluation 'of State / County Response y "E 3OE' i 13 BAC Recommendation Corrective Action E40'

?

the County EOC was advised of the import- Steps have been takee to improve comunai- i I I^

F,1 b. 46. Changes in plant status and other cation of information to the municipali- )

important exercise developments ance of timely release of the EAL's. Re d F.1 0 was also advised to send the county com- cies. Bauever, i' is not clear whether 4 F.3 were not prompt 3y relayed by the ,

this issus was covered at the July coe=.

musications officer to the July communica-

) CCEOC to the Greesarich and Stow musications course. Clarify this by Creek EOCs. Communications proco- tiens course. (See Attached Class Boeter).

J 10/5. (If it was not covered, indicate j drues with local EOCs should be uhat training / drills will cover this clarified, and communications per- - material W provide a. course description d soonel trained. The CCEOC should by 10/5. ' An attendance roster should be j review its plan to assure that provided before 10/23.) It should be j appropriate messages are transmitted noted that other important developmaats i to the local EOCs, and participate should be relayed to the local BOC's la in c - festions training drills addition to the EAL's. Also,by 10/5 f- with the local EOCs. '

provide revised plans / procedures pursuant I

{

to the original BAC comment. At the next i

• exercise, federal observers will evaluate

• the edusty's'c'apability in this ares.

h l

I i

i 1

i i

• i j

.o I

I 1

I t

I i

l i

i i __. _

^

,aos l

4

g,,e.e,2.,1,33 Fase 22 of R -

l

. gw C g

g we t . , it eej . ~3 1 3A RA

'je lg 8 b4 :3 82 g l 333 W =*ies Corrective Acties State (S)/ County (C) Beepense (ACTIGI) st*13 c s1 FEMA Evaluetten of Stata/ County Beepease M[

s The Stow Creek Coordinator was informed Completed Revised procedures providing for the on- A ,I I VII. Cumberland County knicipalities

• 9.3 w. a otetes toers testestEng the that greater use should be made of the going use of both a status board indicat-

- ~ .* .::Mw i::.- g .%.'ha. . e* / ,is'

".. -ftflE'Q';% S 4 *. '

' .;- ~ - . ' '. october 26, 1983 ..-

- 4n- '-

s

. . 'f%.7-W,~- i!j.g  ;@'k G',  :- . . . . . ". - q s *s. .3 ...e

."-  : d;. .- . ..W.c p,W .

. .. -~%s%g.

e ;. 74 -n d e.9.c.;.

4 " ,

e' y w.; . . . . ..

1 '6s

~

• ^**

p . : .'*: ..

-.. . . e;g. . =.f x ..:?. g = e. . -

, ? .-

6 - ,-'.< .6.' .v{Q =.y '.f

, *.;yg'x yvsc

. , -= .* *

,qf?ti.L . .

..- '; - . ~ . .-. g,%. .,:. g ;_ , .,gn, - ..

27 .p,b; 3. ', e.'.,y 1 s , -

s ..R**.te rw*

- L * ..

=+

. , e-

' * ,Q 36

^

.

• a'.R~ * '.$$ ; .

, .4:=4 g w h

5

.'Nk) b .e.

~ ~ .

eu w- .

eoe oun ,

M ,

a e. g e er ..

a o e- o3e 9 O o. #.

oe. - e. a =

88 State (S)/ County (C) Response (ACTION)

$03 FDtA Evaluation of State / County Response E- asUe-E._

es i

E RAC Recommendation Corrective Actica 4 i The following items were inadvertently }

omitted from the original table. Boser Kovieski's 9/3/84 letter, however, asked

• the state to respond to these issues by 9/12/84:

m 50. (#42 in the 1983 Post Exercise Assese-amat Revisica 2. March 12, 1984) .

The state should respond to this. I Even though there was acceptable coor- No state response dination of protective or parallel actions from the state perspective. .

directives were act effectively acted ,

upon at the county sad local l'evel. .

Information ==g-t was weak sad ,

l coordination of protective acticas .

2 -

inefficient.

• ," i

! (The Assessment lists this as incomplets *

' for Salem County, Cumberland County, a I

3 Sales City, Elsimboro, Greenwich sad 8

! Stow Creek)

• I.

i 4

1 1

i i

i 1

4

• - saim -== e=====tus surtos excactss-moeuaan minia.e ,, , -l

,. ^

ceteher 26, IM3 *I

~. *  ; ,.

.  ? l.

Pese 24g q-

- g . w.

1; 33 eef g j -- 1$

m n St* - m4 4 5g g

{ .

state (s)/ county (c) neepense (Acricu) 282 ro m restostsen et state /commty anspees. Ij fl

• d j , . 3<w nac w =* w corrective action -

51.(M3 in:the IM3 poet Esercise a== =- 1 .

Revision 2. March 12, IM4) h state should respond to this. I 1 A.4 A1chough a letter was seat to all ao state response Mayors and Boards of Chosen Freeholders as a result of the IM1 esercise, the level of participation of, emergency personnel in the esercise was disap- -

pointing. Every effort should be - -

ande by the Mayors and Board of Free-holders to educate their emergency personnel of the importance of the ^*

exercise esperience. .

(h' Assessment lists this as. incoe-

~

plate for Elsimboro.) , , '

, *F.

e 4 * .

e y r

e i

e a

• SALDI NUCLEAR CDIERATING STATION EXERCISE RDfEDTAL ACTION 5_ ] .,,

~,, october 26, 1983

-  ; g-

. -5 ' Page2g n

a Q~ ,

m3

~3 1

". m SE" sem 3

me.

R~t o u

,13 o State (S)/ County (C) Response (ACTION) Ud5 FEMA Evaluation of State / County Response ISI . 30

• H *., y4 IU RAC Recoaseadation Corrective Action he county demonstrated it's ability to Roger Kovieski's September 3,1984 letter A I J.1C.J. 52.* : (#57 in the 1983 Post Exercise requested that the referenced plan re-Assessment Revision 2. March 12, 1984) evacuate the population in the 1983 exerciae. vision should be provided and that, if The 1982 Post Exarcise Assessment stated', Access control points are the responsibility

" Salem County must demonstrate the capa- of the State Police, the county has no .

appropriate, a similar revision should be provided for Cumberland County. To bility to implement protective measures. assigned role. The state will revise the - date, the plan revisions have not been The county should demonstrate its Salem County Plan to indicate that the submitted. 'They should be submitted by capability to participate to relocate sheriff does not have an active role in access October 5, 1984 .

the populace, evacuate residents from control. Access Control was not an the EPZ, and control access." objective in tLe 1983 Exercise.

At the 1983 exercise, the county demon- ( e above was provided in the state's strated the ability to evacuate resident rch 2, 1984 letter regarding remedial from the EPZ. Access control was not ao actions.)

objective for the county for this exer- ,

cise and should be demonstrated in a ,

future exercise. .

l -

(The Assessment lists this as incomplete -

for Sales County)

I i