ML20094S249

Requests 30-day Review Period Be Established for Des Soon to Be Reissued in Entirety Due to Printing Errors in Original Documents.Review Period of 30 Days Believed Appropriate in View of Familiarity W/Original

ML20094S249
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	08/14/1984
From:	Walka R ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
To:	Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8408210205
Download: ML20094S249 (1)

Text

r jto %,

A 3y UNITED ST ATES ENVIRONMENT AL PROTECTION AGENCY c REGION 11

+,,,

26 FEDERAL PL AZA NEW YORK NEW YORK 10278 14 AUG1984 Mr. A. Sche ncer, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 Divison of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccanission Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Schwencer:

Wis letter is in regard to the ccmnent period to be established for our review of the draft environmental inpact statement (EIS) for the operation of the Hope Creek Generating Station located in Salem County, New Jersey. We understand that your agency is in the process of reissuing the draft EIS in its entirety due to printing errors contained in the original docunents. Although these doc-unents were essentially unreviewable, we believe that we can couplete our review of the new docunents within 30 days of receipt because of our familiarity with the original inconplete set.

'Iherefore, we would like to request that you allow EE% 30 days from the date of receipt of the new documents to review and cmment on this project.

%ank you very nuch for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely yours, w.__syL J@

Richard M. Walxa, Chief Environmental Inpacts Branch cc: Jan Shaw, EPA David Wagner, NRC l

i 8400210205 840814 PDR ADOCK 05000354 A PDR doo2, iO

.