ML19209B193: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:'f/0'.fo-332'A.munc c-.'V noix A E Le c'rEr'c An n Pow e n Co n ra ny nienwono.visoin 4 nu es a9. 0 n in) {3' July 11, 1979 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Serial No.
{{#Wiki_filter:'
543 Office of Inspection and Enforcement P0/FHT:baw U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket No.:
                                                                                'f/0 A  .                                                                            .fo-332
50-338 Region II License No.:
.                               munc c-V noix A E Le c'rEr'c An n Pow e n Co n ra ny nienwono.visoin 4     nu es n in) {3 a9. 0
NPF-4 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
                                    ' July 11, 1979 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director                       Serial No. 543 Office of Inspection and Enforcement                   P0/FHT:baw U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                   Docket No.:   50-338 Region II                                           License No.:   NPF-4 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303


==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==


In response to your letter of May 15, 1979, in reference to the inspection conducted at North Anna Power Station Unit No. I on April 30 - May 3,1978, and reported in IE Inspection Report No. 50-338/79-21, we are forwarding the attached amended response.- 'Ihis amended response is intended to clarify our initial response dated June 6, 1979, Serial No. 391, by providing the revision and date of Regulatory Guide 1.33 in paragraph 2 of the response.
In response to your letter of May 15, 1979, in reference to the inspection conducted at North Anna Power Station Unit No. I on April 30 - May 3,1978, and reported in IE Inspection Report No. 50-338/79-21, we are forwarding the attached amended response.- 'Ihis amended response is intended to clarify our initial response dated June 6, 1979, Serial No. 391, by providing the revision and date of Regulatory Guide 1.33 in paragraph 2 of the response.
We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the report.Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company has no objection to this inspection report being made a matter of public dis-closure.Very truly yours, h-. SALLNtGJ C. M. Stallings Vice President-Power Supply and Production Operations Attachment ec: Mr. Albert Schwencer 1113 i'3 7f0YSo 7 910090 3Oh
We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the report. Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company has no objection to this inspection report being made a matter of public dis-closure.
' '"MLCOPY g  
Very truly yours, h-         . SALLNtGJ C. M. Stallings Vice President-Power Supply and Production Operations Attachment ec: Mr. Albert Schwencer 1113 i'3 7f0YSo
.[Attachment page 1 of 1 M Initial response date was June 6, 1979.AMENDED RESPONSE TO NON-COMPLIANCE ITDi REPORTED IN IE INSPECTION REPORT NO.
                                                                            ' '"MLCOPY 7 910090 3Oh          g
50-338/79-21 NRC Cocment Based on the NRC inspection April 30 through May 5, 1979, certain ,of your activities were apparently not conducted in full c,ympliance with NRC requirements as indicatcd below.
 
These items have been categorized as described in correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.As required by Technical Specification 6.8.1., written procedures are required to be established, implemented and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix"A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33, November 1972.
[                                                             Attachment page 1 of 1 Initial response date was June 6, 1979 AMENDED RESPONSE TO NON-COMPLIANCE ITDi REPORTED IN IE INSPECTION REPORT NO.
50-338/79-21 NRC Cocment Based on the NRC inspection April 30 through May 5, 1979, certain
        ,of your activities were apparently not conducted in full c,ympliance with NRC requirements as indicatcd below. These items have been categorized as described in correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.
As required by Technical Specification 6.8.1., written procedures are required to be established, implemented and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33, November 1972.
Contrary to the above, written procedures have not been established, implemented and maintained for the emergency diesel generator lube oil and cooling water systems.
Contrary to the above, written procedures have not been established, implemented and maintained for the emergency diesel generator lube oil and cooling water systems.
This is an infraction.
This is an infraction.
Response The above infraction is correct as stated.
 
Specifically, pursuant to Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice" Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following information is submitted:
===Response===
1.Corrective steps taken and results achieved:
The above infraction is correct as stated. Specifically, pursuant to Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice" Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following information is submitted:
.A review of the emergency diesel generator operating procedures was made.We determined that valve checkoff procedures did not exist for the associated lube oil and cooling water systems.
: 1. Corrective steps taken and results achieved:
A review of the emergency diesel generator operating procedures was made. We determined that valve checkoff procedures did not exist for the associated lube oil and cooling water systems.
Subsequently valve checkof f procedures were written and approved for these systems.
Subsequently valve checkof f procedures were written and approved for these systems.
2.Corrective action taken to avoid further non-compliance:
: 2. Corrective action taken to avoid further non-compliance:
Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Revision 2,1978, is being reviewed to insure all required procedures are written and implemented.(This revision was selected because it is specified by the Unit 2 Technical Specifications) 3.Date when full compliance will be achieved:
Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Revision 2,1978, is being reviewed to insure all required procedures are written and implemented. (This revision was selected because it is specified by the Unit 2 Technical Specifications)
: 3. Date when full compliance will be achieved:
The valve checkoff procedures were approved on May 9, 1979.
The valve checkoff procedures were approved on May 9, 1979.
..} $1l f*1J i}}
f*
                                                                                } $
1l   1J       i}}

Latest revision as of 06:33, 2 February 2020

Responds to NRC 790515 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-338/79-21.Corrective Actions:Review of Emergency Diesel Generator Operator Procedures & Review of Reg Guide 1.33 Conducted
ML19209B193
Person / Time
Site: North Anna Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 07/11/1979
From: Stallings C
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
NUDOCS 7910090308
Download: ML19209B193 (2)


Text

'

'f/0 A . .fo-332

. munc c-V noix A E Le c'rEr'c An n Pow e n Co n ra ny nienwono.visoin 4 nu es n in) {3 a9. 0

' July 11, 1979 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Serial No. 543 Office of Inspection and Enforcement P0/FHT:baw U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket No.: 50-338 Region II License No.: NPF-4 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

In response to your letter of May 15, 1979, in reference to the inspection conducted at North Anna Power Station Unit No. I on April 30 - May 3,1978, and reported in IE Inspection Report No. 50-338/79-21, we are forwarding the attached amended response.- 'Ihis amended response is intended to clarify our initial response dated June 6, 1979, Serial No. 391, by providing the revision and date of Regulatory Guide 1.33 in paragraph 2 of the response.

We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the report. Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company has no objection to this inspection report being made a matter of public dis-closure.

Very truly yours, h- . SALLNtGJ C. M. Stallings Vice President-Power Supply and Production Operations Attachment ec: Mr. Albert Schwencer 1113 i'3 7f0YSo

' '"MLCOPY 7 910090 3Oh g

M [ Attachment page 1 of 1 Initial response date was June 6, 1979 AMENDED RESPONSE TO NON-COMPLIANCE ITDi REPORTED IN IE INSPECTION REPORT NO.

50-338/79-21 NRC Cocment Based on the NRC inspection April 30 through May 5, 1979, certain

,of your activities were apparently not conducted in full c,ympliance with NRC requirements as indicatcd below. These items have been categorized as described in correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.

As required by Technical Specification 6.8.1., written procedures are required to be established, implemented and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33, November 1972.

Contrary to the above, written procedures have not been established, implemented and maintained for the emergency diesel generator lube oil and cooling water systems.

This is an infraction.

Response

The above infraction is correct as stated. Specifically, pursuant to Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice" Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following information is submitted:

1. Corrective steps taken and results achieved:

A review of the emergency diesel generator operating procedures was made. We determined that valve checkoff procedures did not exist for the associated lube oil and cooling water systems.

Subsequently valve checkof f procedures were written and approved for these systems.

2. Corrective action taken to avoid further non-compliance:

Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Revision 2,1978, is being reviewed to insure all required procedures are written and implemented. (This revision was selected because it is specified by the Unit 2 Technical Specifications)

3. Date when full compliance will be achieved:

The valve checkoff procedures were approved on May 9, 1979.

f*

} $

1l 1J i