ML20214F464
| ML20214F464 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 06/11/1986 |
| From: | Saklak R AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Schamblin D COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| OL-I-ROREM-037, OL-I-ROREM-37, NUDOCS 8705260103 | |
| Download: ML20214F464 (1) | |
Text
__
~
~
/
NGCLIAR REGULATORY CouMits:0 11
~
37 DuketNo. N I S Y 0 cial Esh. No.
6//)?S fa ee menitet. b u h 2 AsN L ht L
+
d' totNnnED
- utt May 17, 1985 trcmt3 ecaat
'87 APR 22 P6 33
["',,
I-M 2 Richard Saklak(Fr3 1
cait
- nuxier a -/
m N a # As 3.,
Mt P
spect I
O 56 aseter _
312-981-0621 Dan Schamblin Commonwealth Edison Braidwood Nuclear Power Plant R.R.
- 1 Braceville, II, 60407
Dear Dan,
I am writing to you in hopes that you could possible shed some light on my discharge with the L.K.
Comstock Quality Control Department.
The basis of this request from you is due to the lack of jetails I have received from L.K.
Comstock Management.
As it was put to me the day of my meeting with the L.K. Comstock Corporate Staff, "It's out of our hands."
Allegedly Commonwealth Edison invoked a contractural agreement that allows Ceco to execute the right to hire or discharge
~
given individual.
a From the day (3-29-85) some 27 field inspectors reported harrassment and intimidation to the day (4-23-85) I was discharged, the opportunity to account for my actions to the NRC, Ceco or Quality First personnel was not granted.
This bothered me particularly in that this situation was not handled the same way the John Seeders incident was handled and for that matter all parties involved in that case were still employed.
After retracing my activities leading up to my discharge I i
have failed to see that this was the straw that broke the camels back.
I also do not understand when reviewed in its entirety i
and not just a one line quote from a half hour conversation that this incedent was so malign the penalty was ultimately deserved.
Recently I had applied for a conduit inspector position at the Bryon Station of which there were openings.
After performing the usual background checks my application was submitted to,the Ceco Q.A. Department'and rejected without comment.
Dan, as you and the other personnel in your department know I am not the kind of person who just gives up or quits when confronted with a problem.
After working in the Nuclear Electrical Business for six (6) years I wasn't expecting to drop out of sight and start a new career from scratch.
I would appreciate hearing from you at your convenience.
yR052sogo3 96062 J3,"
ADOCK 05000456 Ri ch a r d b--Sek lak G
[?/@Q7.;;rrc d
EXHIBIT W # [s 4
m m.
.~
N D M22HM 2
,