ML20237L746

Order.* Oral Argument on Pending Appeal of Intervenors Bl Rorem Et Al from Licensing Board 870519 Concluding Partial Initial Decision in OL Proceeding Will Be Heard on 871021 in NRC Public Hearing Room.Served on 870903

ML20237L746
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	09/03/1987
From:	Shoemaker C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:	COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO., NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC), ROREM, B.
References
CON-#387-4317 OL, NUDOCS 8709090058
Download: ML20237L746 (2)

Text

^/:r/57

~ Gr.rE H ~

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UM NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL 8SO((D -3 P3 :45 Administrative Judges: gg.

DbCi.

Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman Septembdr 3,' 1987 1

Dr. W. Reed Johnson Howard A. Wilber l l

i

) SERVED SEP - 31987 In the Matter of )

i

)

COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-456-OL

) 50-457-OL (Braidwood Station, Unit )  !

Nos. 1 and 2) )  !

)

ORDER The oral argument on the pending appeal of interveners Bridget Little Rorem, et al., from the Licensing Board's May 19, 1987 concluding partial initial decision in this 1

operating license proceeding will be heard at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, October 21, 1987 in the NRC Public Hearing Room, Fifth Floor, East-West Towers Building, 4350 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland. Each side will be allotted one hour for the presentation of argument.2 The appellante will be heard first and may, if they so desire, reserve a reesonable portion of their time for rebuttal.

LBP-87-14, 25 NRC .

For this purpose, the interveners constitute one side and the applicant and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff the other.

!Por$88s8FOjb /JS 01 0

2 In preparing for the oral argument, counsel may assume that the members of this Board will be generally familiar with the decision under appeal, as well as with the l

appellate positions of the parties as developed in their briefs. For this reason, it will not be necessary for any counsel to engage in an extended discussion of the background of the controversy. Rather, each participant in the argument should proceed directly to the heart of the issues raised by the appeal. I I

Each. party shall advise the Secretary to this Board, by letter mailed no later than October 13, 1987, of the name of i

the person who'will present the argument on its or their behalf. l l

It is so ORDERED.

I FOR THE APPEAL BOARD I D. 5 h i C. J Qn Shoemaker  !

Secretary to the f Appeal Board i I

l l

--___