ML20067C108

Concurs W/Licensee 821203 Request for Restoration of Low Power License & Stepwise Licensing Schedule to Full Power. Schedule for Proposed 3-step Licensing & Transmittal Forms Encl

ML20067C108
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	12/06/1982
From:	Cooper W TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES
To:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
5511-225, NUDOCS 8212080479
Download: ML20067C108 (3)

Text

$fC WTELEDYNE ~@

ENGNEERING SEFMCES 130 OECOND AVENUE WALTM AM. MASSACHUSETTS 02254 (617) 8943350 TWX (710) 324-7580 December 6, 1982 5511-225 Mr. D. G. Eisenhut, Director Office of Licensing UNCONTR01ED COP.Y Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Docket No. 50-275, OL-DPR-76 Diablo Canyon Unit 1

Subject:

IDVP Concurrence with PG&E Request for Restoration of Low Power License and Stepwise Licensing Schedule to Full Power.

Dear Mr. Eisenhut:

The PG&E (Crane) letter to you dated December 3, 1982 contains the subject PG&E request. As will be described below, the IDVP paf,ticipated j in preparation of this letter from the viewpoint of the IDVP activities associated with each of the three steps, and concurs with the PG&E submittal in that regard. That is, the IDVP believes that the technical information identified for IDVP sutmittal at each step is responsive to the staff recommendations and does provide reasonable assurance that the objectives defined will be achieved. With respect to the remaining contents of the proposal, the IDVP has reviewed these and concurs with

! PG&E that the technical submittals of 'each step are responsive and reasonable. The IDVP has no coment on the possible schedule or financial impacts of the PG&E proposal relative to the staff two-step procedure.

PG&E has given the IDVP the opportunity to coment on several drafts of their December 3rd letter, and we have done so. In most cases our coments have reflected our interpretation of the Comission and Staff positions and the contents of the PG&E proposal relative to those positions. With respect to those items proposed to be submitted by the IDVP, we provided PG&E with recommended wording for each step. The final PG&E submittal is in essential conformance with our recommendations with one exception. That exception has to do with the scheduling of the final report concerning the non-Hosgri spectra. We had suggested that this was logically a part of Step II, whereas the l

1 PG&E proposal places it in the last step in agreement with the staff l proposal.

ENGINEERS AND METALLURGISTS

- - SFTELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES Mr.Eisenhut(USNRC)

December 6, 1982 5511-225 Page Two We have also received a copy of the PG&E (Crane) letter to you of December 2, 1982 concerning estimated schedules for the three-step process. This was received by us as we were working on the schedules to be included in Appendix A of the TES December Semimcathly Report. We have combined our schedule information with the IDVP aspects of Figures 1 and 2 of the PG&E letter of December 3, 1982 as indicated by the attached Figure 1. Comparison of that figure with the schedules included in the PG&E December 2, 1982 letter indicate no major inconsistencies between the two. The " tightest" point is indicated to be completion of Phase II additional verification, and this is also the most poorly defined point in aur schedule - since that work is currently being planned. Many of the IDVP dates are contingent upon receipt of timely and acceptable information from the Diablo Canyon Project. The PG&E letter of December 2nd indicates that many of these dates are to be later than we hd expected in preparing Appendix A to the IDVP . November Semimonthly Report, and these changes account for many of our schedulo changes over the last two weeks. -

Very truly yours, -

TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES $' I William E. Cooper Project Manager - 5511

~

WEC/1h .

Attachment cc: G. A. Maneatis (PG&E)

H. R. Denton (EC)

R. H. Engelken (NRC)

H. E. Schierling (EC)(2)

R. R. Fray (PG&E)

R. L. Cloud (RLCA)

R. F. Reedy (RFR)

F. Sestak (SWEC)

H. B. Brown, Esq.

D. F. Fleischaker, Esq.

J. Reynolds, Esq./J. R. Phillips, Esq.

B. Nortnn, Esq.

A. C. Gehr, Esq.

R. Hubbard B. S. Georgiou, Esq.

J. Roesset -

l l

SPTELEDYNE Attachment 1 ENGINEERING SERVICES Mr. D. G. Eisenhut December 6,1982 IDVP SCHEDULE RELATIVE TO PROPOSED 3-STEP LICENSING ACTIVITY FUEL LOAD LOW POWER FULL POWER A. IDVP Reports

1. Phase I Status Final -

3-1-83 4-15-83

2. Phase II Status Status Final 2-15-83 4- 30-83 6-1-83'

3. ITP-QA Status -

Final 1-14-83 3-1-83 ',;

i

4. Construction QA Status - F1'nal 12-31-82 4-1-83

5. PG&E/W Interface Final - -

1-25-83

6. Hosgri Spectra Final .

1-7-83

7. Non-Hosgri Spectra Status -

Final 1-24-83 4-1-83

8. Verification of ITP Status Status Status Action 3-15-83 4-30-83 6-15-83 i

j

_ _