ML20236U101

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Attachment 1 Tabulating Info by Category W/ Exception of Concrete Expansion Re Insp Status Rept & Attachment 2 Illustrating Info Stored in Data File for Project.Related Documentation Also Encl
ML20236U101
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 12/05/1983
From: Wade W
EG&G ENERGY MEASUREMENTS
To: Kirsch D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
Shared Package
ML20236U046 List:
References
CON-FIN-B-8552, FOIA-84-21 WOW:84-06, WOW:84-6, NUDOCS 8712020285
Download: ML20236U101 (54)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. ...n... a x...-. _. - h )1 O W [EGsG ENERGYMEASUREMENTS GROUP San Ramon Operations 28o1 OLD CROW CANYON ROAD. SAN RAMON, CA e TEL(4151837-5381 e MAIL BOX 204. SAN RAMON, CA 945a3 in reply please refer to: WOW: 84-06 5 December 1983 i Mr. Dennis Kirsh U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Subj ect: INSPECTION STATUS REPORT l

Reference:

Memo; D. Kirsh to W. Wade dated 30 November 1983 This report provides the information requested in the reference memo. tabulates the information by category with the exception of concrete expansion - anchor bolt data which is not available. Anchor J bolts were inspected against the appropriate Foley or Pullman specifica-tions (QCP9, OCPE9, and ESD 223) when they were used for the installation. I I Aside from population data, the information was derived from records main-tained for the inspections conducted under FIN B-8552. The inspections were conducted between July and November 1983 and some are incomplete. As a consequence, a description of the discrepancy and an assessment of the significance is provided only for completed inspections. illustrates the information stored in the data file for this I project. The computer was asked to list all completed inspection items having a discrepancy for which a quality assurance (QA) report and/or a citation has been initiated. Incomplete inspection items for which QA reports have been initiated were also added since these reports provide 2 the descriptive information needed to assess significance. If further explanation or additional information is required please contact me at my o~ifce in San Ramon. W. O. WADE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WOW: cog fM202g587112i CARDEB4-21

PDR, Distribution:

LLNL EG&G/SR0 l T"Tumi ngs R. Pong i M. Eli A. Debeling R. Bogdanowicz C. Morton NRC T. Bishop g' q P. Narbut i l I P. Morrill m _ __

I 1 ,i' l ~ 'p;<5 gg"=- N N Y N N N H N N N N .S l: E 6A M E 6 o 4 t i N S Trt y u o n P S E N o E E E E M RN T E E sS S S T3 rS A_ 6 N pE l 8 4 0 E wS 3 c i O S rS r oT O u o uot N R A MI 4 MsN A O 9 t oM oC oI E D A 1 s -, E TTO u ouo u O N L L P R 1 c G sM i. L L N oNLNL H P N AI C o L T v L T T_ I F E A L D G - R t - E G '- G R A - s-R - t N o u M t O N 4E 9D 3 0 7N 8 H 2 L C C 9 o T

z. uG

- Z R R 3 3 I s t l t Z R3 c 3 N 4 A d - E S TzA z Z C I i P O PO N O o oI oS D oL O C oRsO N OP O O O O JO A OC O oA n t O E eL e E E E E E E ( E ?. D cBoO oT O A S-E S 4 4 + f l A. "Nn o o I R n N*S i T (o C e F T A n O F_ '* E M t O F u (o R M""I T e P u o 7_ N P M O N n Ti pI os 0 ,~

  • A R.

P E T 0 q~- E TS A. n0F 2 o C t eMb t T u l McP A' e Z R ~ t u O ~ i R sM F I o. E g NV W. )D A N L O O E N I T M I T R E SI epm f P 4 E C C C-L N l o f M 9 N P E M N O o 5 5 P u O N C i H N (1 T N A _ ) T C. N _ M NNg I MG aSoE E ~_ L rT R o p c E C P N N e E M 7 M_ O P o N E u C S C 1 S R _ P u M (M H E 1_ A E s l t C D Ni M C N )D L Oh n A T T E__ NoE L t B e P cE G o ep E L C AR I 8 N. wo< P e 6 F 5 w l E p No R bc S W f N A - oO p L G R 7 yK S M_ E c Rc B Me O i A F M p R I U 3 F 1 Mt N g I I Mo 4 g M T r u T R A o E S 2_ P T N 8 P E u M M Y S o _L H f R i A T o O Cy c C A U A G RW P I TT E T E. S A T C_ c N I A A C E_ (R t m$ l b i j (lIl l

li [1! I i. i b gg/= N N N N N = ) t S 38 Y S R E r T-9 C E c E 4 N S N t L S S 1 O s O D E A ErO T oT s BE T F, P uo ut s S s uLlh_L MM fL F o C~ E o.N A L L.. u-R r .G G G R - M T G C 7 M_8 N E S 9.N 7 7 S4 N I t I 0 o R O R 0 NO R t . R O t 7.P I P D I O O oS UI A 1 ES E S E E EI O.- MA N EDmO R R I e:WTeA. T G A O pfoE L MFMiWmP R m u P u N N C sg I o T R D pi y ir R = A

3u O

e G C t mFF Emb u T I F MOI P A D u o R H M I R Ri I o E S NV ) A ~ O nD L oE ~l N T. G R

t. T c E.

l C EF A t ES Bo wP I M N P E M o O GC TI S D uN N A T Ms)E N I N T oE E NE g iL rP R oD g E c Y N egR e M N e o N E m ' sC R P u S aN A E N D' C E I C D N "')T N D L O e1 E Lw 3 R E B M G E. C o OF # tP N At MO" f M E F I

  1. C D

u o R S H W f N oO b A_ t E IT R T S NA s C M C o M E O RI A F m EP R u TS F I MD H N I O I M M M u 5 A T 3 E S Z R T T 8 O C P O N P T L u )t 3 o f R 1 i c o O A S 's T C n R C o E G Y O P L E T W (c RA H S C N T C. E N I A E C-E LS A lP ii!$

, il ;(fi F t 1 p74 , q M= A d d W l g R. e Y N. wg D 3 C o e n 6 a e 9 N n a. r R r f Wa n A n a te 1 P r-a A s F E g n' C R. ~ a V e M 4 / a E C I 3 T 3 4 a. 3 D S e M 3 1 3 e z s I C O N N' M B D o e e o M 4 M t M _ "H N A 0 y ~ R l Fg"#Mt T: z. R a G E S s A. r. s t O S Og R M p E u P u T P M 3 D I P NO nH Di e o IT R D T 4 A 2 o A E E ^3 t 2 g m C BFF gu L I F Mos 8nP m D u C y b I RN M P t E m 4 V ) t nD o o ET Tg T E i a cL 8 0 G R e Ep 1 E g Bo wP g M P e M T )E O S p u M C N h N ( N " HT oE 4 E R PTiL y N Bp" cM 3 roD E " P / E (D P N E M ' S P u ' N H A E N

  1. ' (I l

C p N 4 )D r O e1, s T oE s R T Bm E cE L o Dp E L o 3 A ~s Mo P P f S M I D u N oC 4 S ' (I 1 f N oO gg tT R y N A E Sc 4 / Rc B Me / A F M Ep l u T3 I MD N g I g MoM s u ywr -y s S Z s 8 a y w a. T s f R a A P a. e P o O u S G c a wl n t J. A E v l \\l afb .c T 4 e A r v p ?

na eA 3 s R M. s 3 a .s 7 o 7 s 89 ao N wiw/M u o $ yr 3 s + 4 uM aL 1 a1 j 1 gn ,7 t ~ - nf4 - e- ~ s 7 s.6 M 0 r F a

s. m S smA o

0 r 7 e B 0 eD3 a , a. 2 K B 4 x 7 0 4 o s I s z /o ~ C q r oc a . 0 aa a eua e D 2 r E a oC ap0 c Ms/MwMw MAMw M D or - ML a o o M e 3 og ga MA M A H N eSI o s +< c R T c Ep W i o Pog AMt 1 R M L G u 7 pRI cT P P u O 4 P i t m t t M m ? T R P-I i T 1 rY S A c A C t T t q efF{8 Mp q t u cm F tu o b i R M M I F NV )D G O P. N E ~l s f OL T T e R &Uh 3 r t G s L C t E fi c I S Eo-WP Z. D ^ I P E M n c S P u o H C h Nb N T C. ) I f 4 t Nl t t E $o M E g C. Ti L o D n P o N E aoP WC pC I M c N N g o r C P A S N H A E N Ph t t t C P N K'h

o. +c I l

i s% l t R h C P F- / / T. E W' r o 't AR / l t t t p bN S I PI C N f oO p t -I T g T o 3 yA C gc gE 8 gP 2 i A F g S o 1 MD g N g O I M M u S T S 2 R 3 O y P f g P o ) U Q J M TA C / 7

i lf ,'e

l i

W M M y pf4 gc % =_ / + a e u a g c r y e r we ct n s n ( =- a e 4 g u B c a 7

a. "f u

Nk Y. v e e M r s s 3 a s c s D. b 8 D c J &7 H we w. q Me 9 s .a a w n a. r m p c 1 W v. I mut e e n ~. s. s e c s. e r F, g a a w" e p p n o ~ a.

  • M n

s a g y ~s n J, d e 2 e c s d. = s 'J e 6 mW s, we s

  • mm s

s e a w 4 s. r e a a s n c 0 a s s ~ o e a C o P O A'c r 4 d R s Fe s 8 a a u 0 wS o A T C S G A S A 4 c MA DM N EI i o R R WTS T G E A F AML O S oE LE u R M F ET P P uM SRI O P Nc N M ~ i o T R D~E T 0 p e A S A. 3 E Ei Mu / c BFf A t i L I WOf F D E E P O Tb 2 R N MMRI P E 4 V )p t O P-N m u ~ W Ts O N i T. G E O .R C L rI EFl E P P N E S B O-P M P E M N O S N C S P u O N N bl N T C )E I 4 N HT ~ oE t . A NE R PT ~ iL oD E E c P Y B F M y N nE M oR EP O C S C P u S N N A E N D (i t I C D C s )D O_*elN N oE 3 R AT T e B M E PC E ~ t L o Bg E E Aa Mo R P e P F C S tp u SNc C S H t D f I f N oO D E tT R T iA E gc S ~ c B gE R' F M S S l A u I MD N N g I O M M S ~ u L 7 S 7_. 6 s 8 8 o S 1 J f M tA o g o L d. 4 e Z g W qu t1 W i l c i

o ' ~ . ATTACHMENT 11 U l N LOG PART STA8T COMPLETE STATUS MAN , NUM LOC T ITEM NUMBER DATE DATE CRli CONTACTS AFF STATUS DATE INSF HRS E0019 AUX BLDS -1 RACEWAY SUPPORT 14/CSR-127-3480 7/13/83 10/19/83 BCP 3 OCP 5A DCP 9 GCP E9 MONTER0LA PE CAMPBELL F0 MORRIS 0N.P6 PHYSICAL 9/23/83 MWE 8.0 l MVR-E2625 9/23/83 E0020 AUX BLDS 1 RACEWAY SUPPORT 10/CSR1274!28 7/13/83 10/31/83 GCP 3 GCP 5A QCP 9 GCP E9 MONTER0LA BE CAMPBELL F0 ' MORRIS 0N P6 RECORDS 9/23/83 MWE B.0 - MVR-E2625 9/23/83 E0022 AUI BLDS 1 RACEWAY SUFFORT 12/H-115-6-105 7/13/83 8/29/03 QCP 3 GCP 5A OCP 9-i SCP E9 MONTER0LA BE l CAMPBELL F0 HERNANDEZ NR CITATION B/20/83 MWE 2.0 MVR-E2618 8/20/83 E0026 AUX BLDG 1 RACEWAY SUPPORT K-154-1-!!2 8/05/83 10/15/83 GCP 3 GCP 5A DCP 9 GCP E9 MONTER0LA BE CAMPBELL F0 MORRISDN PS PHYSICAL 9/15/83 MWE. 5.0 MVR-E2653 9/15/83 E0027 AUX BLDG 1 RACENAY SUPPORT 9/K-140-4-140 8/05/83 10/15/83 GCP 3 GCP 5A QCP 9 .j QCP E9 MONTER0LA BE 1 l l CAMPBELL F0 l MORRISON P6 PHYSICAL 9/15/83 MWE 5.0 MVR-E2653 9/15/03 E0028 AUX BLD6 i RACEWAY SUPPORT 9/K-140-4-136 8/05/83 10/15/03 QCP 3 9CP 5A QCP 9 ) GCP E9 MONTER0LA BE CAMPBELL F0 MORRIS 0N P6 PHYSICAL 9/15/83 MWE

5. 0 MVR-E2653 9/15/83 E0032 CONTAINMENT 1 RACEWAY SUFPCRT 245-140-8-E3008 10/15/83 GCP 3 GCP 5A l

QCP 9 1 QCP E9 MORRIS 0N PS CAMPBELL F0 PHYSICAL 10/20/83 MWE 5.0 E0033 CONTAINMENT 1 RACEWAY SUPPORT 10/F-140-5-965 10/15/83 GCP 3 QCP 5A ~ GCP 9 GCP E9 MORRISON P6 CAMPBELL F0 PHYSICAL 10/20/83MWE 5.0 ~ E0039 PENETRAT BLD6 1 RACEWAY SUPPORT 146E8W1151313 10/18/83 10/31/83 QCP 3 DCP 5A QCP 9 DCP E9 MORRIS 0N ~ P6 CAMPBELL F0 PHYSICAL 10/20/83 MWE 3.0 MVR-E-270310/20/83' E0043 TUEB1NE BLDB 1 RACEWAY SUPPORT !!/C-104-8-10 10/19/83 !!/17/63 GCP 3 GCP 5A GCP 9 GCP E9 MORRIS 0N P6 CAMPBELL F0 PHYSICAL 10/19/83 RMB 7.0 RECORDS 10/19/83MWE 6.0

MVR E-2705 10/31/83 ACC-W/O-GA !!/17/83 RMB 1.0 E0044TUEBlNIBL96 1 RnCEWAY SUPPORT 15/A-119-3-44 10/19/03 !!/15/83 GCP 3 GCP 5A DCP 9-GCP E9 MORRIS 0N P6 CAMPBELL F0 DIMENSION 10/19/83 RMB

7. 0 RECORDS 10/19/83 MWE 6.0 1

MVR 4 E-2704 10/31/83 MVR E-2706 10/31/83 ACC-W/0-GA !!/15/83 RMB 1.0 E0075TURBINEBLD6 i RACEWAY SUPPORT 45/A-!!9-5-48 10/26/83 11/01/03 GCP 3 GCP 9 GCP E9 MORRIS 0N P6 MELLO F0 RECORDS 10/26/03RMB 1.0 PHYSICAL 10/26/83-MVR E-2711 10/26/03 ACC-W/O-GA !!/01/83 RMB 1.0 E0077 TURBINE BLDS 1 RACEWAY SUPPCRT 50/A-107-7-88 10/27/83 11/02/83 GCP 3 9CP 5A GCP 9 GCP E9 MORRISDN PS MELLO F0 RECORDS 10/27/83 RMB 1.0 PHYSICAL 10/27/83 1 MVR-E-2713 10/27/83 q ACC-W/O-GA 11/02/83 RMB 1.0 q E0078 TURBINE BLD6 ! RACEWAY SUPPORT 50/A-119-2-15 10/27/83 11/02/83 DCP 3 l QCP 5A 1 GCP 9 j QCP E9 MORRIS 0N P6 J MELLO FD RECORDS 10/27/83 RMB 1.0 PHYSICAL 10/27/83 MVR-E-2714 10/27/83 ACC-W/O-BA 11/02/83 RMB 1.0 E1002 AUX BLD6 1 RACEWAY SUPPORT CSR-127-4 56 !!/08/63 !!/17/83 QCP E9 CAMPBELL F0 MORRISON P6 NVR-E-2729 11/17/83 RP 3.0 E1014 CONTAINMENT 1 RACEWAY SUFFORT H-85-1-42 !!/08/83 11/17/83 GCP E9 CAMPBELL F0 MORRISDN P6 MVR-E-2729 !!/17/83 RP 3.0 M0023 CONTAINMENT 1 PIPE HANGER 12-196SL 7/07/83 10/12/83 ESD 223 TINKLE P6 BAUDIUSD P6 RECORDS 9/02/83 MWE 8.0 OMooz9 (see ne,ct page) g-{g42 MWE

6. 0 M0029 N/A 1 PIPE HANGER 46-9V 7/11/83 7/11/83 ESD 223 HOWELL BE l

ilNKLE P6 CITAT!DN 7/11/83 ASD 1.0 RP 1.0 M0047 N/A 1 P!PE !!ANBER 22-196SL 7/13/83 7/13/83 ESD 223 TINKLE P6 i HOWELL BE DR-5184 7/13/83 A6D

2. 0 RP 1.0 M0085 ftUX BLD6 1 PIPE HANGER 555-172R 7/19/83 9/02/83 ESD 223 TINXLE P6 61ACOLONI BE SAUDIUS0 P6 PHYSICAL 8/20/83

~ WELD 8/20/83 MWE 5.0 MVR-M4511 8/20/83 MWE 1.0 ACCEPTED 9/02/83 i M0067 CONTAINMENT 1 P!PE HAN6ER 57N-38R 7/20/83 9/02/83 ESD 223 6AUDIUSD P6 i TINKLE P6 HOWELL BE WELD 8/20/83 MWE 5.0 l RECORDS 8/20/83 MVR-M4511 8/20/03 ACCEPTED 9/02/83 MWE 1.0 90066 CONTAINMENT 1 PIPE HANSER 57N-2BV 7/20/83 9/02/83 ESD 223 TINKLE P6 61ACOLON! BE BAUDIUSD P6 WELD 8/20/83 MWE 5.0 0 Mon 38 (see next page) MVR-Muti 8/20/83 ACCEPTED 9/02/83 MWE !.0 90160 1 PIPE HANBER 73-39R 8/09/83 9/15/83 ESD 223 TINKtE P6 6ADICO P6 DOLE P6 MVR M-4533 9/15/83 RSS 1.0 CHM 1.0 M0200 1 PIPE HANGER 92-103R 8/17/83 9/15/83 ESD 223 TINKLE P6 6ADICO P6 DOLE P6 DR 5144 9/15/83 EWR 1.0 CHM 3.0 H0261 N/A 1 PIPE HANSER 22-547SL 8/24/83 8/24/B3 ESD 223 TINrLE P6 LORTIE BE MVR 4542 8/24/83 A6D 1.0 M0330 1 HVAC SUPPORT SKC-HV570 8/11/83 9/20/83 GCP 40 BERESTEDT F0 0'CONNDR PS IR8827-71 9/20/83 RSS 1.0 CHM !.0

  • M'131 1 H'/AC SUFPOEI SkC-HV368 8/11/83 9/20/83 GCP 40 BER6STEDT F0 j

D'CONNDR P6 1R8827-71 9/20/83 R6S 1.0 CHM 3.0 ,M0344 1 HVAC SUFFORT SKC-HV367 8/11/83 DCP 40 NOVACK F0 CARLSON F0 1 BER6STEDT F0 IR8827-73 9/20/03 RSS 1.0 CHM 2.0 50003 CONTAINMENT 1 ANNULUS 6181-C1-13-610 7/14/83 GCP 3 GCP 5A GCP C7 GCP 9 KOHLER BE ~ KITCHEN P6 BER6 F0 PHYSICAL 9/15/83 GA 9/15/83 NCR5422272 9/15/83 MWE 5.0 $0046 N/A 1 SWITCH BEAR 6422-T1-13-871 8/25/83 8/31/83 OCP 3 PALARM0 P6 NCR 8/31/83 A6D 1.0 5422-255 8/31/03 S0049 N/A 1 SWITCH 6 EAR 6422-T1-13-874 8/25/03 8/31/83 QCP 3 PALARM0 P6 NCR 8/31/03 A6D 1.0 5422-246 8/31/83 S0061 FUEL HANDLING 1 FUEL HANDLING 6100-F1-13-026-016 9/22/83 10/20/03 QCP 3 QCP 5A 'F GCP C7 KOHLER BE TIN 6 LEY F0 CANNIN6 F0 MUNRO BE WELD 10/14/83 MWE 3.0 NCR-8833 10/14/83 ACC-W/0-CA 10/20/83 MWE 2.0 50062 FUEL HANDLING 1 FUEL HANDLINS 6180-F1-13-026-!!6 9/22/83 10/20/93 DCP 3 GCP 5A QCP C7 KOHLER BE TINSLEY F0 CANNING F0 MUNRD BE WELD 10/14/83 MWE 3.0 NCR-8833 ACC W/0-GA 10/20/83 MWE 2.0 50063 TURBINE BLDS 1 TURBINE BLDS 6424-T1-13-794 !!/01/83 GCP 3 GCP 5A QCP C7 GCP 9 KOHLER BE HARRISON BE BERS F0 MARTINSON F0 K!RSCH NR WELD !!/01/83 MWE 16.0 NCR !!/03/83 RMB 5422-332 !!/03/83 NCR 11/03/03 5422-333 11/03/03 NCR 11/03/83 5422-341 !!/03/83 NCR 11/10/83 MWE 10.0 5422-351 11/10/83 CITAT!DN 11/18/83 MWE 10.0 i M0025 AUl BLC6 1 P!PE HANGER 85S-66R 7/07/83 9/15/83 ESD 223 ilNrLE P6 SM11H BE l 6Aut!USD P6 PHYS!tal 9/07/83 ] Ef5lPi'il'il! / s/o2/83mm"S$223= g,HrSiCAt Mm81Umst it06. w w N6ER

  • 3nR

,,02,83 aa%. A2m "i O

e - -- g-g p-- EECEIVIN3 CFFICE D cket Numb:r (if cpplic bl:)

1. Facility (1:s) Invsiv:d:

INim;) IM mor. then 3. or N b/d /h b/k' M 5 I# .k 2 g.noric, writ. GENERIC) DAliT5 1 %& 2 S i' 3 .9 5 J

2. Functional Arests) Involved:

Ich.ek appropriate boites I operations onsite health and safety construction offsite health and safety j safeguards emergency preparedness other (specity) 3.

Description:

l/f l L l( l? I/-IFI'J l l /:l 5l 2 l /l El e 1?l Sl lMl Cl4'l 5l l/) I/.'l 4l IA16l/ lul6-1 IdelJIEIcIrIFlo I la I/17INIeI(171 IAlol lels li Inlr IFl I.1v15171/1F1/ IrlMITle If IM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l' I I I I I I I l-

4. Source of Allegation:

(Check.ppropri.te box) contractor employee security guard f licensee employee news media NRC employee private citizen organization tspecity) other tspecify) MM DD YY

5. Date Allegation Received:

p 'T. L V. /*, t.$ //c l3 / [ /)lt,cWl (

6. Nan *e of Individual tri,si two initi.i..nd i.. n.m.)

i / Receiving Allegation:

7. Office:,

ACTION OFFICE USM" l

8. Action Office

Contact:

triest two initiets and i.si n.m.)

9. FTS Telephone Number:

4 g 3 g 3 ~

10. Status:

Open, if followup actions are pending or in progress (Check on.) Closed, if followup actions are completed MM DD YY

11. Date Closed:

) l l- ~ 7;, / 3 '2. Remarks: . l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I I I I !- (Umit to 50 cher.cters) l IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ' N.1 Man-hours /Date w. r

13. Allegation Number:

S V 6 5 -A-O o ";t 6 - w, [ 1y a

y .. LZZ.. ZZ.Z. ZZZEU Z -' ~ - ~, ~.l ), THE HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY N ER: NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Page 1 of 1 8802-861 Day Shift ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: ATTACHMENTS DATE: WELDERS AND WELD PROCEDURES QUALIFIED TO PRONG YesCNoQ i 83 AWS CODE HOLD TAG # N/A, REMOVED REF. HPF/IR NUMBER: N/A BY DATE UNIT I Q UNIT II{[ LOCATION CI. ASS I NON-CLAS$I] i INSPECTION CRITERIA: DRAWING Q SPECIFICATION g PROCEDURE @ Spec. 8802 6.1 DOCUMENT TITLE AND NUMBER: QCP-5A AWS D1.1-82 Par. 1.

2.2 DESCRIPTION

OF NONCONFORMANCE: (Including Cause) Specification 8802, Paragraph 6.1 states, H.P.F. is required to comply with the " Code for Are & Gas Welding in Building Construction, published by AWS". 1 H.P.F. QCP-5A Revision 9 requires welder qualifications and production welding to be in compliance with AWS D1.1-82. D1.1-82, Paragraph 1.2.2 specifies a minimum base metal thickness of 1/8" and states that AWS Dl.3 should apply to base metals less than 1/8". Contrary to this requirement, H.P.F.'s Welder and Procedure Qualification and Production Welding in the Electrical support work has been performed in accordance with i AWS Dl.1 instead of Dl.3. \\ ( b" h '-INITIATED BY DATE C. SUPERVISOR REVI % DA DISPOSITION: Revise ()CP-5 and QCP-5A to call out D.1.1 - 75 for electrical welding Spec 8802, as per attached letter from PG&E (June 14, 1983). Previous work was accrznplished as per the attached procedures. Accept as is. Procedure qualifications was performed and is acceptable. /d/D D46765ITION BT 'DATE / 7P.G.6E.Co. g DfTE QUALITY REVIEW 'D#fE i v DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED OcP 5 D E.s/ts t C) WE F~- DCN 5 QLP GA T,? G tr o l o REf Pcou"8 W G \\lt ou.S WC2h Ascty;"~4 AS IS Pfd AWW W Ql'r/.^/ ? l r ;d I ,v r R //. .n n ;.; // n L, /,' s .A ji$,b.IFIED BY DATE /y.L. SUPERVISOR DATE .ma & I lose tY-1e a er = -099-8fel I-

..... ~. _ -. "r M - @l *"" "' W% hlKAL - " - - - ~ " " i T ' \\ 6 I"* *

  • DATE:

pp,5cggpytps: "I' wi g, t.'rt.n 4' r S'/C l'- T j H0!.b ! n. ] M::s 'h.b f REF. HP fil H '4MB Ld : BY 'C '5LAUS I b ' ' ~I \\S3 I.TN IT 1 h N !" Il[!L'"'.ilION 1 l * "M ENTf ~ ' " '? i ] SPEC!flCATION O es"'i t>cx' O t I.NSPECTION r.R1TERI A: DNW I SC i DOCt.'MDrT TITI.E AND NUMBER: nCP-5A Rev. ') Para. 13.

2.1 DESCRIPTION

OF NONCONFOR.%\\;;r.E: (Includinv Ceu ') There are a number of Class I walt!< that the Welri ' rod Tym, Sara a n' t WDS <* r c unverifiable per N'P-SA cara. 13.2.3. $00 k #} ITIA $ BY 3 ) E lL Sin na ti DATE .) .C. SUPERVIS08t REVIEW DATE H.P. FOLEY DISPOSITION:

1) Visually inspect welds in quest irin to existinct visual necept ance criteria.
2) Accept weld filler enetal type Am Ts.

a) A010 and 701a are t he only typ. s isnoed t o Elect r ician t' elders.. b) M t h 6010 a nd 701A are a cm

  • at lo for us< on cle.et r w4: rurport,.

(DISPOSITION CONTINED FN PAGE.' ) APPROVAL OF D S 5,./o mb4~ M ' _2 A J L L e A / L ~~ r </- D l SPOSITION M DATE/ f /pt1TYREVIEW g[\\/ P.C.6 E. DISPOSITION OR CONCURPLNCE: ,a '0 A i ee ,1, t - - _.f s l -

  • esse c

), W ...e,' m o-g .-~.. -.,.,... . ~. 3g- --k/ ..e ..,s._.., ~ \\ l .i ~ ,3.. ).,,. t. l i ., I... 1...,. .i ' lem* *.m m - -- t 4 O~ ^ (, m.w...-==** ~' Wmeene, s,.... e .--__-_.-...s

l t I Tile IlOWARD P. FOLEY COMPMfY 'O - y i NONCONFORMAtlCE REPORT CONTINL.*.TIO!! SHEET no2 a'l Sev NTItk1ATIo!J or: DESCRIPTION O!' NONCO" FORMA:lCE O PA'0 Ol'. Ph0POED DI SPOS T'"IO!! O DISPOSITIO!J ACCOMPLISilED DA TE(1 - 4 1 ))i L, H. P. FOL FY DIS *TGIT10tJ: C' !T ! *.' 1 I M

  • l l'N* f: 1:
3) Accept rod '.1ze An In if var.ual in q.r.cti<m i t,

.v<op'. *le, a) Nemve and replace wold if lat:k of fu.aion i t, n<>'.<<l.

4) Accept Ht.# As Is - Only acccotable filler snaterial is issueel to the rod control station.
5) Revise 9-SA to require the welth r to enter nir.e, heat No, and t yne of itv! uved on the applicable t ork Copy dor unentation. OC to verif y it 's ent ry.
6) Record this NCP Number on affected Sit?S's i l'IS's.

l t

    • ?

h --s-APPROQAL OF DISPOSITION wo.

aW

+ - ', W ~ - ~ - ,f.*~,,.. _,~, _ ~ n._.. ... ~ ~ .. - - ~ ~. e... ~~- 4... r. N mee M m O-p es.., ~ ~~~

  1. ~

x e. --E-'- ~ ^ -' "-~ ^^ ~ ' - ~~ ~

4 ...( s 3' TEE BOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY ER: NONC05'FORMANCE REPORT, Page 1 of _ 6 Cg E.q i DESCRIPTION: Qk"P-SA - Quality Control Procedure . ATTACHMENTS ATE: (~ for AUS Welding D1.1. j The above referenced Procedure is not in accordanet Yes No C 9-6-83 with the referenced Code - AWS Dl.l. BOLD TAG f "/^ REs0vED i RET. EPF/IR NUMBER: N/A BY DATE UNIT I UNIT II x / LOCATION Various CLASS I x NON-CLASS I x INSPECTION CRITERIA: ' DRAWING.] SPECIFICATION @ PROCEDURE b CODE X N TITLE AND MER: (SEE LIST OF PROCEDURES AND CODES ON PAGE 2) DESCRIPTION OF NONCONTORMANCE: (Including Cause) The referenced inspection criteria, H.P. Toley Q.A. Manual, states in part : "...special processes are performed in accordance with the requirements of applicable design drawin'gs, specifications, procedures, codes and standards by qualified personnel." In violation of this Q. A. !!anual is the referenced Procedure (QCP-SA) because it is not in accordance with the above referenced Code (AWS Dl.1). Also, please note: (CONTINUED ON PAGE 2) m j!wJ 9--/-6.$ \\ w-~ __Lw IIATED BY DATE Q.C. SUPERVISOR REVIW DATE { l H.P. POLET D'ISPOSITION: ........s UA9h $01)) */!) <W6 / 1 g pr s .R., w h:5 %, ~ 3, W l DISPOSITION SY DATE QUALITI REVID DATE P.G.6 E. DISPOSITION OR CONCURRENCE: n .P2 A gtrnDauTinM DMI V ' b.6 E. Co.' ' * DAIE DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED VERIPIED SY DATE Q.C. SUPERVISOR DAIE b i p ) }.

... ~, a.:~.~-

.:zz;a z= =

vj THE HCMARD P. PO1ZY COMPANY 'HONCOhTOR.%NCE REPORT -L CONTINUATION SHEET @ ~U - l CONTINUATION OF:. DESCRIPTION OF NONCONTORMANCE D PAGE: 2 OF L PROPOSED DISPOSITION O DISPOSITION' ACCOMPLISP.ED C MA /3 TE 6-83 INSPECTION CRITERIA: (CONTINUED FRO!! PAGE 1) . QCP-S A - Quality Control Procedure for AUS Welding D1.1 AUS D1.1-82 Structural Nelding Code - Steel H.P. Foley Q.A. Jianual, Section IX, Control of Special Processes 10 CPR 50 Appendix "B", Section IX, Control of Special Processes ' I DESCRIPTION OF NONCONTORMANCE: (Includine Cause) (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1) 1. The Procedure (QCP-5A), Paragraph #1 " Scope", states in part, "This Procedure outlines the basic requirements to cover... gas netal are ' ' ~ welding." , ;,, 4 .The Code (AWS D1.1), Paragraph 5.1.2, requires a welding procedure a specification to be prepared for the applicable process. This has not been done. NOTE #1: The welding procedure specifications are currently for Shielded 14etal Are Welding and Flux Cored Arc Welding (FCAW). NOTE #2 : FCAU is not noted in the Procedure's Scope. g q.m 2. The Procedure (QCP-SA), Paragraph 3.2.1, states in part, ca ~Q,t,.I' .he-Production-superintendent (is) to insure Production forces under p 0; P his supervision are kept informed of and are working ' to the latest.- ( requirements specified in the Quality Procedure."

J J...

This has not been done. Welders are frequently found*to be unaware,._ . ~ 7. ". e of even the welding procedure specification that they are using. The - welders are not formally trained in the procedure. Z L, ""IT 3. The Procedure (QCP-Sa), Paragraph 6.1.2, requires that the base netalaQ g c:0~~d> prepared by oxygen cutting--surface roughness values not to exceed 1000 mil or 2000 mil, as applicable. y , ' An ANSI Surf ace Roughness Gauge is not in the H.P.. Foley Tool Room, /h" Calibration Lab, Field or the Q.C. Department Tool' Locker. p NOTE #1: This requirement is taken from the Code- (AWS D1.1) at.- M Paragraph 3.2.2. Also, see Note 4 of that paragraph. A-NOTE #2: Discovered in the Purchasing Office was an AWS C4-1-77 O Oxy-fuel Gauge. However, these gauges are not applicable to this ' Z referenced Procedure or Code. O-+ 4. The Procedure ( @P-5A), Paragraph 7.6.1.1, references welding processes g FCAU-GMAM and StiAW.' The Code (AWS D1.1), Paragraph 5.1.2, requires a welding procedure _ p _q j, specification to be prepared for the applicable process. This has not 4 me been done for the GMAN process. NOTE: See Item #1 of this NCR. a: ' S. The Procedure (QCP-5A), Paragraph B.8, states..." caulking of welds, unless E specifically noted by Constructor, is prohibited." ~ [ The Code (AMS D1.1), Paragraph 3.9, states: " Caulking of' welds shall not j be. permitted." t_ (CONTINUED ON PAGE 3) Y, . ' ' ~ . '. b;, > _. a Y y. % ____m

,,..~ -...-.--~.--- - - 3 3 THE HOWAR.D-P. FOLEY COMPANY j.i .tiONCONTORMANCE REPORT . CONTINUATION SHIET ho*2,M 2. CONTINUATION OT: DESCRIPTION OF NONCONPORMANCE E PAGE ' 3 OT 6 PROPOSED DISPOSITION O-DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED Q / 3A . k ~ / 1-6-8 ) DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: '(Including Cause)' (CONTINUED TROM PAGE 2) Q-W NOTE: The Code (AWS Dl.1),. Appendix 1, " Terns and Definitions", states h,

  1. p '},J' '.

" Caulking. Plastic deformation of weld and base metal surfaces by

  1. . D mechanical means to seal or ' bscure discontinuity'ies."

o f' 6. The Procedure (QCP-5A), Paragraph 10.3.1, references AWS Dl.1 Current Revision. 'l The current Revision is not in the Q.C.- Library, and to the Writer's I ~ knowledge, the current Revision is not on site. NOTE #1: Current is 1983.. k NOTE #2: The Procedure (QCP-5A),~ Paragraph 2, references AWS - Dl.1-75. ! This year Code is not in the-Q.C. Library. 1 NOTE #3: Some site personnel have in their possession'an AWS D1.1-75 I with the 1976 and 1977 Addenda.'. There is, to the Writer's knowledge,j not one of the referenced Code (1975) on site.-

  • 1.

The Procedure (QCP-5A)', Paracjraph 10.2.5, allows the straightening of distorted members by the use of localized heat- (i.e.,. not to exceed [f 1100 F). e The Code (AWS D1.1), Table 4.2 Note 3, rgeords the maximum temperature ~ g for Group "4" materials as 400 F. to 4 50 F., depending on the material thickness. ~ ~ ~ y )m ( NOTE #1: Group "4" materials are intended primarily for. use in dynamic. 4 loading (bridges, seismic requi' ements, etc.), Please' reference AS'1H. r 1983 , Designation: A514-83. NOTE #2: The steels in Group "4" are tempered. 8. The Procedure (QCP-5A), references AWS D1.1 Current Revision. Same as Item #6 of this NCR and also same as Item #3. Procedure (QCP-5A'), Paragraph 10.3.3, does not reference year of NOTE: Code. u 9. The Procedure (QCP-5A), Appendix "A", Paragraph 3.5.7, references minirium fillet weld size for FCAW as 1/8". W; NOTE #1: The Code. (AWS Dl.1). Table 2.7 Note ** states, "tiinimum size for. b ",, f bridge applications is 3/16'. _Z$M f NOTE 42:, The Code (AWS Dl.1), Paragraph 1.1.1, states the' basic division ! g""*,./P It is believed, by the Hriter, that the structural ~ steel work on thisof the Code \\/ Project is built with seismic (dynamic) engineering criteria, so therefore, \\ all work detailed with 1/8" fillet welds is discrepant in accordance with the Code criteria. g' NOTE #3: The Procedure (QCP-5A)'does not reference minimum fillet weld 2 sizes for the welding processes SHAW or GMAW as does the Code. (AWS Dl.1),. 9 Table 2.7. KgwQ l 1 xl NCTE #4: If it is noted in response to this NCR,. for it is not in the 2 ' [. Procedure, that the structural / electrical work is to the building (static .f""" loading) section of the Code,. then numerous supports are in violation of g Code (AWS Dl.1), Paragraph and Figure 8.8.5. . Example S-310,, REV. 231. S-339, PIV. 27 and others..(CONTINUED ON PAGE 4) O G,- . ~ - ~.

...-.~ .~.- 7 A THE HOWARD P. POLEY COMPANY NONCohTORMA.NCE REPORT - CONTINUATION SHIET 803-% _ CONTINUATION OT: DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE D PAGE 4 OF 6 PROPOSED DISPOSITION O DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED C T DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: (Includino cause) (COhTINUED FROM PAGE 3) o' ' NOTE #5: The Code (AWS D1.1-82) specifies the minimum fillet weld size and re-quires that this size be made in a single pass. This requirement is intended .'/'.. to insure sufficient heat input in order to reduce the possibility of cracking in either the heat affected zone or veld metal, especially in a restrained / *T joint. The Procedure does not reference this (minimum fillet weld size) V '['t require 2nent. 10. The Procedure (QCP-5A), Appendix "A", Paragraph" 8.2, states..."Only the responsible P.G. & E. Welding Engineer or Designee is pemitted to set parameters beyond the ranges specified on the HPS." The Code (AUS D1.1), Section 5, " Qualification", 'provides for the qualifi-cation of weld joints by their acceptance to Sections 2, 3, 4, as well as Section 8, 9, or 10, as applicable, or by their qualification pei ref. j. Paragraph 5.2. .f' ~ The Code does not allow the welding procedure specifications to be exceeded. If a greater range of the parameters is required', a new FPS is to be e stablished. Reference Section 5. 11. The Procedure (QCP-5 A), Appendix "B", Paragraph 6.2. This is the same as. ~ M- ; - f Ite n #10 of this NCR. ( 12. The Procedure (f}CP-5 A) Section "D" Stud Welding,. Paragraph D3.2.5 states: "All stud s shall be ir. stalled reascnably' perpendicular to.the sur. face to. which they are. attached. " The Code (AUS D1.1 Cbmentary), Paragraph 7.6, states in part: " Stud s applied to a vertical surface may require rodified are shield gdifpd an are shields may also be required when welding to other than surface 3. Since this and other special cases are not covered by the r. manufacturer's stud base qualification, the Contractor shall be responsible for the per-femance of these tests." NOTE 61: The Procedure does not reference any additional requirement for vertical, overhead, etc., welding. The referenced Procedure Paragraph permits all position welding 7 NOTE 62: of auto atically controlled time welded studs. 'i 0 13. The Code (AUS D1.1) requires tests to be perforried by the contractor (H.P. Foley) for other than flat position welding of autor.atically controlled time y welded stud s. This has not been performed. h 14. The Procedure (QCP-5 A), Paragraph D3.2.6 states: "If the reduction in length of studs as they are welded becomes less than normal (i.e., the length of the / stud is core than 1/16" greater than specified), welding shall be stopped (p',bh ' i.rnediately and not resumed until the cause has been corrected." (/ Z The Procedure (QCP-5A) also notes the references for welding as D1.1-82 and D1.1-75 (Electrical only) at Paragraph 2, " References." The referenced Pro-C f cedure Paragraph D3.2.6 is taken from the AUS D1.1-75 Code. Z E. The stud welding section of the Procedure should be based upon the require-ments of D1.1-82, Section 7 and Appendix "K" per the reference section of the g l Procedure (QCP-5A). g* ~ (CO!?TINUED ON PAGE 5)

%@99@@Wf@{$M8@i8 ' REPORT _ __- __ o f - CONTINUATION SHEET 03' l. CONTINUA 710N OT: DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE D Pact 5 or 6, PROPOSED. DISPOSITION O r- ' DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED D DATE ( DESCRIPTION OP NONCONFORMANCE: (including Cause) (C0h7INUED FROM PAGE 4)

14. (Continued)

' g,.' g' NOTE #1: AWS Dl.1-82 is basically different from the Dl.1-75 Edition for the qualification process and procedural requirements. j NOTE #2: The referenced Procedure Paragraph on stud reduction has been deleted since 1978 from the D1.1 Code and the stud length reduction is found in the b Manuf acturer's Qualification Test Data for each and every diameter stud, along with its weld time cycles (in 1/60 seconds) and welding current. Also, please I reference AWS C5.4, Table 4 - Typical Length Reductions of Studs in Are Weldingt j and Table 5 - Typical Welding conditions for Stu$ Welding of ' Steels and Paragraph 6 - Welding Procedure ' (Studs). NOTE #3: AWS C5.4, Recomended Practices for Stud Welding, is referenced in the Code, AWS Dl.1-75-83. Also, AWS C5.4 cross references itself with AWS Dl.l. 15. The Procedure (QCP-5A) Weld Procedu: e Specifications are not in accordance with V v the code AWS Dl.1. Reference QCP-5 A, WPS 1, Position of Welding 'ALL (Verticalb g Upward s). I 6 lt is the intent of the code (Aks Dl.1) that code users detail the position of welding (i.e. Flat, Vertical, Overhead, ' Horizontal-) in order that the anps & volts parameters are conducive to produce quality welds. NOTE: This is typical throughout the weld procedure specifications.

16.. The Procedure (QCP-5A) Weld, Procedure Sweifications are not in accordance with

( the code AWS Dl.1-82. The Weld Procedure Specifications are not detailed. NOTE #1:, Instead of detailing out the groove preparati'on' dimensions, the Procedura,1 + states, The groove preparation (i.e. Root opening "R", Roof face "F", Groove v Angl e " A") Engineering variables as noted in the code and then includ Fit up" tolerances. f Note: This allows the welder to engineer his own joint' configuration. ' '/ t 17. The Procedures (QCP-5A) Weld Procecure Specification WPS-81 and WPS-82 weld I 1 syrbol is for a Tlare Bevel Groove Weld. The referenced DCC 4362 (Found in Q? Rerarks block of WPS-82) paragraph "C" states in part; Dr. Moss Davis (AUS) agrees that Flared single level (SIC) Groove Welds (for superstrut) shall be considered Fillet Welds...D NOTE # 1: The H. P. Foley letter to AWS dated February 21, 1978 Figure B details 1 'i it as a Fillet Weld, AWS confirms it as a Fillet Weld and the Procedure details as a Groove Weld. NOTE # 2: The material thickness is not noted on the WPS's. N. NOTE # 3: WPS-81 Remarks block references DCC 4361. This should be DCC 4362 as noted above also as noted.in WPS 78, 79 'and 80. 18. Reference the above Item 17 Notet 2 of this NCR. The Weld Procedure Specifications WPS-81 and WPS-82 treterial thickness is not noted. De Joint Design sketch for i WPS 81 and 82 can be / could have been mistaken for Tube steel to Building steel C l application using E-60XX electrodes. 1 p COh'TINUED ON PAGE 6: N Y

  • 0MT ON O N _.Y j

...~- N a Y ,f 1 .L;.

. a. .m. . - - - ~ - - THE HOWARD P. POLEY COMPANY NO, ] f, ' HONCONTORMNCE REPORT - CONTINUATION SEIE; 802-924 ( CONTI.WATION OT: DESCRIPTION 07 NONCONFORMNCE D PA CE 6 Or 6 PROPOSED DISPOSITION O DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED C DATE ' 83 (' DESCRIPTION OF NONCONTORMANCE: (Including Cause) CONTINUED FROM PAGE 5: p 18. NOTE # 1: The incorrectly referenced DCC 4361 (WPS-81) and DCC 4362 (WPS-B) is not readily available to craf t and inspection personnel for it is a P.G.st. wCunENr. p NOTE # 2: The incorrect Weld symbol (for Superstrut) is correct for Tube steel, f 19. Reference Item 18 of this NCR. This condition is also applicable for WPS-78, 79 ' i and 80 prior to PCH# 12. 20. The Procedure QCP-5A, WPS-62 is not in accordance with the Code AWS Dl.1. This Joint Configuration is not prequalified per AWS D1.1-82 or any other Code _ If this Joint has been qualified by H. P. Foley it is not noted, also year. which is not noted are the Joint details, such as material. thickness, root

opening, radius, etc., so it is not known what material this WPS is to be used on or, have been used on.

21. The Procedure QCP-5A, WPS-62 details a dashed horizontal line on the vertical item on the right side of the sketch. It is not known the intent of this dashed horizontal line. If <the KPS is showing the effective throat of the weld then this is indeed a Non-conferning condition for it is excessive (Joint penetration) detailed on the WPS. ~~ NOTE # 1: Actual Joint Detail performance tests are required per AWS Dl.1-82. ( The Joint Detail and Welding variables (i.e. Electrode size, Amps, Volts, Helding positions, Root opening, etc.) should be shown en the W4P.S. NOTE # 2: This information is required to make accurate Engineering and Inspections. NOTE # 3: The Procedure contains in it 's written form 29 ea "may be", 3 ea "should be",1 ea "if necessary",1 ea " preferably", 2 en " reasonably", 3 ea "as practical", 1.ca "where practical", 1 ea "when practical", 1 ea "where possible", 1 ea "as possible",1 ea "when possible",1 em "Same general position",1 ea " reasonable sco ot h and regul ar". i i 1 i 4 M0M4N~0X 0.\\3 l t= 1 ~ _.m__.__._

'u u l 1. ( M 4 ' TO: $ van Vine. /p.Fs h I n TRO.M: gckWilson,QualityDirector REP: NCR 802-924 Notes o discussio 27/8 DATE: eptember 29, 1983 I ~~ The follbing is an evaluation of the referenced NCR and the response ~ there to:

1. - Item 1 is not a violation of Code, but is an inconsistency Y

be~tveen the scope and content of the procedure. Engineering vill process a PCN. Item I has not resulted in a non-conformance, p,scJA. * 'CF4-6 Q ubmit this item on a separate NCR. MOPHN). I j' 3. All oxygen cut surfaces are dressed by grinding and do not r exceed the 1000 uin requirement in paragraph 3.2.2 of the AWS Code. There is no need for a roughness gage. This item ],- has not resulted in a ran-conformance. 7 4 This item is not m' code violation, it' 1's euch Iike Item 1. Engineering vill process a PCN. There is no non-conforming condition. THE 5. No caulking of velds has been performed. Engineering vill WARD P. FOLEY process a PCN to revise the procedure. COMPANY 6. Q. A. has a 1975 AWS D1.1. f 7. AWS temperatures are interpass and preheat for velding and l donot,dealwithbgndingofshapes. There are no group 4 ...,, ~ materials on-site I 8. This is not a non-conforming condition. 9. Engineering is requesting information f rom the Ovner as to the design basis. It should be noted that H. P. Foley's W responsibility is to erect in accordance with the design 1 [ supplied by the Owner. EDR 1337-1432 rerpense to Note 4 g_,% Resubmit Note 5 on a separate NCR. l /t i t 10. This has not resulted in a non-conforcing condition. 7 Engineering is processing a PCN to revise the wording in the f-procedure. 1 \\l:0RMAT C \\l 0 \\i _Y

1, /.,. .i l 11. Sec ite. 10. - (*' No C1sss 1 automatie stud velding har, been performed on the I 12. project since the 1982 Code has been in ef f ect. Engineering is processin's a PCN to remove automatic stud welding f rom the' procedure. 13. SeeItemk2. ( i 14. See item 12. 15. There is no violation of the code. Electrode utilized by H. P. Foley is designated by the Code as "all position" and the range of amperage and voltage is as specified by the manufacture. 16. The VPS's in use by H. P. Toley utilize the full range of tolerances allowed in the Code. This in and of itself is not a non-conformance. The Owner has approved each WPS and H. P. Foley is erecting the material as specified by the.- design documents. H. P. Foley.is addressing'your concerns to th*e Ovner via an EDR. 17. There is no non-conformance. Engineering is revising the WPS to eliminate conflicts in terminology. 18. See Item 17. ( -ih ) 1 19. See Item 17.

  • K ?TN(-

~" _2 0. Resubmit on separate NCR. 21. See Item 20. THE OWARD P. FOLEY that there is consistency in the use of NCR's and IR's; this COM'ANY project uses the ANSI n45.2.10 definitions. Questions concerning design are processed through H. P. Toley Engineering on an Engineering Disposition Request (EDR), and questions concerning procedure should s be processed through H. P. Toley. Engineering or Quality Assurance on Procedure Change Requests. .[ ?g RLI: tt ce NCR 602-924 h s / WORMAT!aNoyLy ( l =-

J (. l ELECTRICAL / N~ 9756 'MU-4;.h THE HOWARD P. FCLEY COMPANY M4 /. N PRODUCTION ENGNEEfWNG DEPT. AY...d.q k.h . ~.. '. ' ' ENGINEERING DISPOSITION REQUEST l i 3Ep 2S $83 e, m .."i, To

d. Clascu Sutioct Detail versus Prneadure r-

'\\ -.. / Rav B-naimiann n9 hn"40 wa ._g og.,jgs m

n.. e + 4 ~, b.e

. 4 g,, ,.m.,,...4.,,, ,....q..... ,,,. n,,, a,,,,, 3,.,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,3 4(, of the 050024 nrmuin, mene.c chne ch. a.en41 nroon4ie rn, enna. 4 e nu ,k. m. m. a... Ni t-a rou et micumrinne meine uhan the cunnnre A.cmile ennf14rr u4rh th. ...A.... Ref.v.nr. c.1R.1 nry '4AA ..h.A nr e.4e. 4. o..... - *- e e 4e. 4. 4. ecne ......h o< m 4 e,.. .....4 4n.,, ........m 4, .._4 Dj p...u.,..--.2.... 4., 9.. _. te 9. n3nny. .g.f.i.,, I Sgmed mm.b % u Dete 9/26/83 Reply k 1: G. %l / n i-Y:lh .h n,,/R 7.n l@ I s f t e .I I_ 9 V l L \\

4 .1 .e i I j s THE HOWARC D C L 5'r C O M Dt.N Y TRA NSMI':'"A L / TO M NEEDHAM 337g / s3lp3 L r % -- (I I ENGINEERING MANAGER JOB NO. iWY-575-I SPEC. NO. 9IU2.]f J f ur. ERREBY TRABENZT - FGL YOUR APPROVAL l FOR y INFORMAT) ION c 3 h+M902 ct3% @FORTOURRECCmENDEDDISPOSITION e FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION I i O rOR 1rocR SIGNATURE I I ( 1 i I .x. 1 e. m y, (*Tm l '__ _T l' L e. :. arc;;.;;

.' C ! *. :*

3 */ T L o!. a 4d:;AL IJONLL A:i; O.'; 0 TO TC. ?.

!.P.7./7.

.p-1 5 i

n g_ 1_ ~ s' THE HoWARD P. TOLIT COMPANY ER: ORIGINAL xoscoNrow a ct :cron ru e.:_2 r 1 802-938 DESCRis uON: LONGITUDINAL RESTRAINTS FDR ATTACHMENTS DATE: STATION BATFERYS FILLET WELDS WERE MADE UTILIZING / ' MULTI-PASS WELD TECHNIOUt YesO so @

  1. 1o-3-83 HOLD TAC
  • REMOVED

% RgF. RFF/IR NtDERERI~ N/A ST DATE WIT I, @ WIT II@/ LOCATION Battery Room CLASS 1 @ N0p-CL&$5 1 O __.a M- -' "1MyWE14N S.I.I,ERIA.n.' ;DRAWINC ]. SPECIFICATION O r=ac===== 0 coas ^"8 al 2-=2 =c .....m. n-M~~AB NWBER:.SK4-ONS Rev 0, QCP-5A Street. Weld., m D1.1-82.- 1-- . m,.a.~r* ~~- atins: .i, ,5WCRIFTIN OF S WC W FORMANCE: 8truet. We2d -u ' Station Battery's Fillet welds were made utilizing Multi (Muding Cause%.'the Long r- 'the Code (AWB D1.1-82) specifies the minimum fillet weld-pass weld technique. sine and re'2uires that this oise be made in a single pess. 'rk i - n "- i. 7. : - ' _ " - 'n2 :_:'i r '-' "-t '---t8-f:: ^: n f _ :- - ::it i' 8 t y -' r- :'- ' r; 8 - -' m - t h " - ' - ' r= * =d x_. a- - _a _; ; y_ r_ r;in:2 j:' _t. / 2. The H.P.F. Drawing SK-8-OWS Rev 0 is different from the PGEE Drawing of the same number... The M. P. Foley does not have PGEE concurrence. '2he complete work package gi wasp anon 1L)6e field only4the M.F.F. D 7 w 242: - we 2%, k to-MM u-m n -

- sr.

am e.c.I, r-i.uW. am .n... , z,,,mW, V a.x.. fa -s,. w .. =... - ),s r .,%n :. c. u_=:;.[. ?.= 2 -g.k?&g\\=_._c =

v. -

6. k :. w ;=.= y ~ m.z g-d. w g. p a

n

.p., e.y,~. = r - y,. =: ,+ g - -.c N "t?2.?"**'" R D. ...D(.7.,. [h'/ ~~$' f-3.$ IDI$l.~.1 f. arr-wAE;e'ey@!"'"99$4,G;, Fry 4pF;'._ =c T'c- -2 . y7, ....... m,0.m W - y y f r W 7 a,L ,...A ,SLV .h;& +1.9[p k - ~ (. p } ~ e l c.,4-d#, uA ~ INF0fiMATION ONLY ; ,1 - @ "~., f"),,. e, ,3..J f"% !.....

  • a *.

________.________1

e a w ( THE HOWARD P FOLEY COMPT.NV ' TRANSMI' ':'A L I CIy. E MHM 3A73 [jg / g h 3 l ENGINEERING MANAGER sgj 4 JOB NO. TWY-576 D u ~ SPEC. NO. MO9 ) I J 1 ME: BEREBY' TRAERMIT = FCR YDUR APPROVAL ~~ FGt TOUR INFCNU4yACW 9902 C%1.]7 A FOR YtX;R RECOpetENDED DISPOSITION e -r FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION b FOR YOUR SIGNATURE I l l l l w-- THANK YOU A swW ar t ) I ,;. 7EC~.; /IL !.EC:.!'. EL 3'l h ~"-. G. .dG;;.AL a;s;ir.D A:C LA~E; -c ren. u. ?... n. p.g9g.;.,,,. ~\\h e 9

A s TEE ROWARD P. TVt.ET COMPANY NUMBER: ORIGINAL sowcosro w a ct aErcaT raim L: ' 8802-94 DESCRIPTION: AT"'AC)Ot C."TS TE: i PROCEDURE VIOLATION - CO-5A Yes No i-1_.0 8 3, HOLD TAG f f\\l / 8 RznovIn f -- ~ ~. " REF."'EFF/IR WOMBER: N/A BT DATE ,.4 WIT 1. @ UNIT II @ / LOCATION CLASS I NON-CLASSIO [. r ~.$ .CEITE17/a _ DRANING ] SPECIFICATI0= 0. P=ocroe== 0 t f r-y q,t .= aw wr g .2rsts.-,.= z -m.=.m .aso means p.e. Pnocanon von as morna ota-2J; ar'- DB!r4RIPTIN OF NONCONFUEMANCE: (Inc.luding Cause) alho Procedure (QC"P-5A), Paragraph ' 3.2.1, states in part, ...the. Production Superintendent (is) to insure Production libreos teder his supervision are kept informed of and are working to the latest -requirements specified in Quality Procedsm e." This has not been done. Molders are - ' frequently fotmd to be unaware of even the welding procedure specification that they are using. The welders are not formally trained in the procedure. l d$ r.m A r- ~ l [.., ; s : s-O~ig.,.--. - ~ . :~ ~ i ..,c - .W Q j p.,ng ~,..- . r2-==r+.* :- 1 ~ 1 Jm (O'.T*83 .{,"Q.5T. - D421 -Q.4 W an L RETIEW .-- DATE ,M R.P. POLET DISPOSITIONS. ~ .e,s..n z.t* n., y..

1. --@ Mg

_ ~. ', ~ _~ DM5 -a-N E 7,-*~.a'(_.[ x .u d;} , & >_C a ge W. ,1 ~.'E.-Y5 5 "- -A ~17 ~ ~ ,k ~, :,_ w_. %.p -- g p*W~.m,M- -~ 1- ~ aV ' '....t. r-e.. w e- ~, . ygy e.g.::3 g a, -4 m e f. 3.. O M~ #. y,M i..*,-.,;,4'~4 ,,, M n.:e.s m -- m -~_ ~ @ 4 'g. 3.?.M* ;,$. 3- - ~ * -

  • Q* L,Y.y,.. i% ~.~,~au..; ;s 2,

.E.}a - .e e.z.. .R v.. w n t . L;d., :Qik.'i*,7 =.. _. . - w.ai<.:.:.nw:.~ m.wnC %2.,. ::... % s.2 > se av w ~* a.- m - X, s 1.4 cr-v 4y -.. T-*+'W."v*.f:p --J, pg,y -, L s.pa!Ev n._:mr ". -h, , ai.. - r-,- r

.ud m

. c. : 7 'P.G. E. DISPOSITION OR CONCURESCEs .e E, g.. - \\ j ~ i, =- .. i.. a. l I i n IN. FORM ATin.M ONI V e. g

'k THE HOWARD P FOLEY COMoe.NY TRANSMI WAL TO N NNN DATE_ t / 5 / 91 varveranio m kot* aos No. 4-s'n V SPEC. No. 9%02i WE MEREBY TAANENIT - FCR YDUR APPROVAL m' FOR YOUR INFORMA QCN S907. cl4 0 ron roun necapesenoso orsposrtroN l n u - c.mme -r. N b FOR YOUR SrCNA'ItNtr um 1 t~ 1/R a M < k i aT%hu a-/ mt M.1 w wcA E<4.x 2 g 'v e e e A N e r y Nm I ) F 6 4, -,M '- '0";'dL Sy O Y h cr~. n.p.r 1 / IMCAnn A avsani nan s,

. r,:. ER: r m. w.:, m 7. reu:v ~ l c' ORIGINAL "" N ' - '" ' I- " i e2m0 ( 0ESCRIPTION: T H': PRTPN!RT. OC'P ' *., to '  ! *. I 'I~$C ~CNI! A*E: PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION (WPS) I S *. '. Ol' Y !!" ':' ,,. s: s i -.

  • 0-4-R'.

.o !!OLD *AC

  • N/A REMOVED I

RF.F. KPF/IR NUtiBER: SY DATE UNIT I @ UNIT II@/ LOCATION CLASS I h NON-CI. ASS I '., INSFECTIN CRITERIA: DRAWING [ SPECIFICATION PtoCEDURE @ .._DOCtBIENT TITLE AND NtBtBER: Welding AWS D1.1 QCP-5A -c DESCRIPTIVE OF 30BCrarFORMANCE: (Incisding Cause) 'the Procedure QCP-5A, WS-62 is not in accordance with the Code AWS D1.1. This Joint (bnfiguration is not prequalified l per AMS Dl.1-82 or any other Code year. If this Joint has been qualified by H. P. Foley it is not noted, also' which is not noted are the Joint Details, such as material thickness, root opening [adius)etc., so it is not known Wtat matgrial this WPS is to be used on or, have been used on. 'l [r + do D fo-4 8 f lQ /D S-3 'A a .2 y % -SUP g RETIEW INI M IED ST ~ DATE DATE E.P. FULET DISPOSITION: ~

-3

[M =.-l ';,.~.;, C, ~ g r-3%N u:- .. DISPOSITION FI DATE Q0&LITT REFIDI. DATE ...s . ~ '?$- -i 7.G.6 E. DISPOSITIVE Ok e=r"

  • m **

?

I

( ritfColl101eOOed Olspasillan ...,- n n a a m eu # nais V

/ - - vu,e-- 45 !

  • k -~..

~7'C'dOWARD ?. 7 7.IY 'o -l ~ 3:ADt.O CA::TT: l3~ 3: z / (?S) PROCED"RE SPECIT CATION NO. _ ape.3; t.cp_33 F.atorial Specification Wo*1 ding Process _ croup I and II per Table 4.1.1 AWS DI. I' Manual or Machine Shielded Metal Arc Manual Position of Welding Filler Metal Specification All (vertteal-up) Filler Metal Classification SFA AS.1 r701s . Flux. . WL4 Metal. Grade 70.000 Fst w/A ~n 5hia W==& Gas "- mIA $51ag ofrJksittple Fasa_ See 7 mirn=le Pass -~ -k5 ~ f.m.eniale Arc: me--1. g - Ci. french-*iEE - ne ee --a i ~ q - m r '~~ r -Root:Treataant ~ Preheat and Interpass Temperature no to and thru 3/4". :m (a): =-- 30*Fr ever la " sad thru 2in". 150*F: ever 3/4" and thru Ih" r over Zg", ZZY F. "When base estal tempeesture Is Delow 'M*F 4m-ament shall ha erahamend to and maintained at er f.,,,. 70'F durias welding. . d. - n~... '. \\

w k: =-

-o ,xo vcx. - ~ ~ ~.. w,,,g' M TS ..57

s. irT1gEC+ '~IlMyg.

4~~54YAh3If-E- 7 '.:T M. 2 M c. Q;'.. A~~7 .::- i 4 f ~g. w.... -

~ ~ -
L -

-. :.T a. >.r.3/32-t. ."N300- '. 20-30" ~ .~ . W.W.-7. 9 C..- W -44/8 f .!!O-150 ' T!=,' i" ~T.. '.,h - a_5/32, 150-210 . 20-30

l'./ yy. '7 -O 7 2.' ' O l.' s-

= '30 30 54- ...,e .c t c:. .r..., c-

.: f 2Paes width'4 dia7ef elec. bases

... %!~~ ~ _,.-[-E 5.d.-% / P -, - " ~-.- d .areer each p s, e..e, ore ~ W [- O f.- -w . $D.w~. or u.! ttad,es asy.t8 memirimaid e =_==. ds%.M... e ;f %. _.W h.@w ' ".. "-. # g @m.ri.MTJ:'d.,,.~ .::is;fW.' ' -Fi i . em =. .ke.Nuk,, 7. dj o ~ 7~- T _. 5 N M.9[ 1 'L"T.,a. ~. a-- r..,+: .. 'cr# I ~

    • N.s= :,:1..ar -

.?* n. ~ > - -- wh.

a p. +.,ct..
g-3g:

2 4 ~I w NM

b. tM2 6m e-8*
  • Et,,..,. f-vr.4 ~.,.

e. r,,v. ...., :S M.mftsp " m-4 _4. J \\ This procedure may rary 'ee f aerication k uence

  • to s t :h:.,n :.,e.".----.2--

-'2-..1 ee ' ci e. ...-he ^- 1 t -e -"E* ? 3i 0-M e-.;u, ;,.'55 --.a- .t... --.- ~

e....

\\ ( INFORMATION ONLY l Recommended Disposition ~

g...-- ~ 3. t usa s. Q..,f -m $ =. .'...s.e -'e.q - ~. ' O TME RONIID 7. 701ET COMPANY... i NUMBER:,: ~,_s 5. w s.- -TA.- n WONCONFORMANCE REPORT Pcg3 1 cf 2- / -. .. ' ~ 1; -~

-a

-1.-- f4 tan 9_ % ' N> ~ v

- DESCRIPTIONS.

e-..

3. ~.

ATIACEMENTS DATE:. GKT 9. Class"One' Support Rework '3 %~ l 'r--. z-Yes No 0-5 =- ' rT- _;.,. BOLD TAC i ,i y.. --e .:yfg-- s- -_.r RE..M.O. VED e , j . fr.REF.-EPF/IR NUMBER: N/A _ '~ 7"_t - BY.m *.__ -... DkTE-. 6 ,e .T._L. una._ UNI.T II@/ LOCATION Variou's ~ ~J. I. CLASS I @ NON-CLASS'I C 1 l -7 >.J. S.NCTI "N i --.J.;;?:~-. ON CRITERIA Q_DRAWI.NC.. ... SPECIFICATION

a. PROCEDURE.

.. C--- - e% ~m 2..%.- ..c 1.:..; - ED0CIBIENI TITLE AND WEREBERf c.,r I.! ~. ~ k.=".:,..=;= c r - --- I_. --..-. J ~ ~. m _; ::::--*-- -.r: :e c.. -. :-.. m. -' "L -Initistion. of',Worka--QCP-17. REV;;T : = s

g 44
;&r'-9BSCIIFTION OF NONCORPORMANCE:.(Including Cause)....: gj: 4.c
w.,,a,7,-

r.----i.g.-- L _, g c.j ^ .-. c - : - . -.v=. -~. . -". > >- :t.:.c.. ~,c w. = 2"-- QCP-17. REVT"1 Paragraph-id. (Scope) states: "Cla'ss O'ne31ectrfcal Raceway - _.-y = ' Support rework shall,he bandled in accordance with Appendix D.".- Appendix D._ -. - 4 . Paragraph D2.2 states that: "P.C. & E. will issue a, work.-req..uest, for any__..- '.i w support revork (i.e. modifications' deletions, sdditions:or~Eomplete replace- . ;_ j , +

raent') and verification. inspection."

""?_are~being issued to Tav~er " Support" work. Contrary to this,'" Conduit" Change Orders ~J._; ~ ~ e These Conduit, Change' orders do not ---' reference any' vork request and do not fall thin the scope of Appendix D., G ~' -f.f JCONTINUED ON PAGE 2) - C. ...a: - ' "L:;.:: L.:;. :. - =: - 5 T _, -. ~~?-._..-.* +. :._..:. -..L,; =.. Y $ 4 C.-f W E Y

  • ~4f9-s - & -

- -. ll ~~ ~.'.-i _? %$.;5'

  • 2

~.2 ( '~ nATED - :.y., Mn _5T ;;-,. , 1DATE _,_. ~ Q.C. SUPERVISOR REVIEW. 4 E-i-DAT.E _:'. u '.-~ E.'?. POLET DISPOSITION: " ~ ' ~ ~ .. N ' F"~ ~- ~- -se

~~,_
;

. - = u ~ Q - ? Qf, C' - g g...f.&., :.. =r_.e. s _,.N .w. =... 3.. . +- .r _#- w

_.e-c

..=L :. = 2,,2 '".r.,,;,, < n-'- .a.~=.. =. y., ~.oG..::.---- ..--y c -- m_-_ ..s ~.uierggi e.:3,.g.ne w.--- n. *7. _m + c.c .:.-,;r_. m~ - --T ~.;. 3t. < r. h. sca._- e.; w:yn -.. - n

-. ;Qu---=r sk---3__.

. -- r z .g-Q w.: .6' 9. <_ .:. _.: ~ J_:. ^. _. 4. _~-- 7.? I,- mu:m.:a'c :; L;. -w --.. T ,,,,,c~~~~~~~~ 4._:-- :- a -.. r-.- . -.4-w.. ~

:-eJ c

e ,a.-+ a y-< = w - =^ u..- 2.: 4..~~ :.:_ ~-

..- - %.= s r-

~~

  • EF DISPOSITION;3Y-- - r:- a.,f g -DATE

~ QUALITY REVIEW -- DATE O .,._ _. s.: .e -. ::. wy~. 7 - t .P.C.& E. DISPOSITION OR CONCUREDICE: l WORMhTION ONLY m u/ P.G.6 E. Co. DATE z I? DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED ,m i = 3 \\- VERIFIED FY-DATE Q.C. SUPERVISOR DAIL l

v L.. T ---- ' ) ME HOWARD P. j FOLEY COMPANY ~~ ~ J - ~: NONCONFORMANCE REPORT , CONTINUATION SHEET l an?- 9 4 3 1 NTINUATION OF: DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCEfD PAGE 2 O F 1,,, PROPOSED DISPOSITION O / DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED O ATE 1 0 s;- p 4 l DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: (Inc1'uding Cause) (CONTINUED PROM PAGE 1) l-> d-- This is in violation of QCP-3, REV. 6 " Processing and Control of Deviations 4 and Nonconformances." Paragraph 3.2 of QCP-3 states: "The Production -. { Superintendent or Designee assigned by the Project Manager shall be,respon-afble for notifying Quality of deviations and nonconforinances and accomplishing l ~ ~ - ,..all work _in.accordance wath the specifications, design drawings and procedures." + -..: :w '~ _ ) ~~ . _..#.:Per ANSI N45.2.10: " Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions":~ a nonconformance, r - ) is "a. def5iency in characteristic, documentation or procedure which renders the quality of an item unacceptabic or indeterininate. Examples of_nonconformance" ~ fnclude: physical defects, test failures, incorrect or inadequate documentation,- ~ ' or deviation from prescribed processing, inspection or test procedures.!.' e n.,. -.~, ., _., _ ~. ~. -.._~. _... g.. ~. ~,,,,, - =. *. ~ y .( a _r. .. m.. _

-g

... + ~ l f m-l 1 .- r 4. 6 e. m v gy y f,-... k =~ z'~' ~~ ' ~- . f.r. ~ ~ -._ _~. .e ~ ~..g . =~ ~ ~. -

  • - - ~.,.: ~

y 7,.v.,a - --- ,,.7-*- ~ ~ e- ,,.y. e //*o;4 i 9//0/v0//ty l [ n. = l~ l l 5=.a e 1 i l L___________________________________________________________________.____.

t 'e % (l y l l, N2 ~i486 U N g ' l. N 'S [.. ~ 99 c.,,, THE HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY ~~~ uuttlig~ y ~ } ramuenos eaweE=wo oen.. I'.b E

  • ENGINEERING DISPOSITION REQUEST

. k,'- }g $..'M.Ru s s ell '. if' gg Structural Welding Requirements

  1. l T,

~ Problem Per specification #8802 welding is to be performed in accordance. ~ 4F eth dtiiiding section r'equ'i.rements of the ANS. Welding Code -for - ~. 9tNuctur i steei. However atelicable sb$tfon of the AWS Code is no5 ~~ referanced in other iob specifications. It is our understanding that all Structural Ne'fdiW~g should conform with the additional requirements of section 8 - Buildings : Is this 45 corr'ect ? A A Signed -/ Dete '6 7' / c ~~ - o - n. = REdoihE.M. ;T5" Rep:y WGtnn$m 56-1 AL E. MRCohEB ro %E m, ( bW 'T4E

  • >E CT 1 O M Q.6LA"T in _ "Tb. SotbYUE% [JJD

"'t'n E

    • Mst.AL.

w (_ b C>E SEC Tn OQ$. M G. CODE R 6 O Osk&.AA M EQE B R,10Gy6 6 m NW kiiGY YYNYNN $ WL W \\ONNY YY&&LOL s A 2 O 78963 $j ngdh06LILEEEMeL\\ LT. O - - Date g / 'l (76 e h '- l 1 ' ~ :. =.- ~- 9 e g, e CREct' russ ou7~ L C ~ w-_-___-_

...,...;.___.m.__.m..~...__. t ~ THE HOWARD P. FOLEY :eMPANY NUMBER: ORIGINAL [ sonCO :romuCE et 70aI -a n __, 1 802-938 Rev I-DESCRIPTION: VARIO!'S MINU1Uf1 CIZED FILLET WELDS 'AT*ACHMENTS DATE: WERE F1ADE UTILIZING THE FULTI-I' ASS WCLD TECHNIQI'E Yes O no 8 HOLD TAG # RDt0VED REF. RPF/IR NUMBER: N/A SY DATE UNIT I x UNIT II x / LOCATION VARIOUS CLASSI@NON-CLASSIO INSPECTION CRITERIA: DRAWDIG ] SPECIFICATION C PROCEDURE { CODE AWS D1.1-82 ' DON ME M MW QC procedure for Structural Welding QCP-5A AWS D1.1 DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: (Includin( )* Khere is a deficiency in the above referenced procedure which renders the quality 6T N,ht'tj I t,e.ms utilized in conjunction with the procedure as unacceptable. The above refere , specifies the minimum fillet weld size and requires that this size be made in a pass. The above reference procedure does not note this requirement and welds havd.% sade in violation of this requirement. %[ /. nJu so - ? -95 A}O lDr ]'E E DCi!ATED BY DATE ( /'~ Q R T SUPHqyvJSOR' REVIEW DATE H.P. FOLET DISPOSITION: DISPOSITION BY DATE QUALITY REVIEW DATE P.G.& E. DISPOSITION OR CONCURRENCE: i h ~ x P.G.6 f. Co. DATE Ep 31SPOSnION ACCOMPI.ISHED E l ' LEE!I!EO 3Y DATE 0.C. SUPERVISOR M;- 4 +

-.-.,...m.. u._ .m. A NUMBER: THE HOWARD P. FC1.EY COMPANY ORIGINAL s0NCONFORMANCE REPORT PMe Df 1 802-940 Rev 1 4 w: V, s,A 4.. 7 i I DESCRIPTION: He-PPe. 44tPMf;P-5 A, Wrt. DING ATTACHMENTS TE: PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION (WPS) IS NN' OUALITIED 7 ( No O 1_o-7-83 > Yes v ROLD IAG

  • N/A

REMOVED RET. RPF/IR NUMBER: N/A BY DATE UNITII]/ LOCATION CLASS I @ NON-CLASS I C UNIT I X INSPECTION CRITERIA: DRAWING ] SPECIFICATION O P=ocrocar x DOCUMENT TITLE AND NUMBER: Welding AWS Dl.1 QCP-SA DESCRIPTION OF NONCONTORMANCE: (Including Cause) There is a deficiency in the above referenced Weld Procedure Specification (WPS) which renders the quality of all items utilizing the above referenced W.P.S. as indeterminate, The above referenced WPS has inadequate doctrnentation for its qualification for its use. The weld joint details such as material thi s, root opening, radius, initial pass electrode size, etc., are not noted. It known what rmterial this W.P.S. is to be used on, or has been used on. f4 $.- ,n. 7 -(Lo hid' / 0 '/- I3rlfidTED BY ' DATE g Q(Tr.' SUF EW DA H.P. POLET DISPOSITION: DISPOSITION BT DATE QUALITT REVIEW DATE P.G.& E. DISPOSITION OR CONCURRENCE: E e i 2. I P.C.& E. Co. DATE j g E l 2 DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED h h( '.'ERITIED 3Y DATE Q.C. Si:PERVISOR DA~I 1 i h { \\ i l<t

...e..-~=~d*--**** "**T'~'' .s l '., / s ' ". ' f r 1.1. . ". 'J0*[*O'*- .t 'l.* ...7 '...n ..+C. ~. -. - .rt;.s.. e<*,.<. .. u.. n-

v.. e.. -
c.. u....,

s..,.. -- e.. 2 3. .a. . ---- h.Nf%%. = '. '.:.x EUE

leid..4 :s. J.ra at _

70, % >"; "r1Mm A-Tra m _ -.c n ie,.4,.:.g va r. = = syg nm,, __

n n ng.,e or.y.u.::p.e.- a r s _

n.. i. t r i,. r : 5 - wryl y S in g i c o r P.a.'. :1;.'e Ar:

  • ?alding Current _

s i n,. t e Polarity. 33rce: Roo Trea* Den: p,v e r,... Frenea; and nt.rpass..: ; e r.e. :u ;; e _ ;i, t e a r..' inru Si.. none !=i: over 3/a" anc :hru : L. ',' ~ .;ne

  • d*F: over Ib" and thru 2b"
50*F; over ;5".
.T T.

'.5 a s 32*T. b a s.c metal R a s e. retal temperature is iclew s h r M egg _gh t a t t.4

  • o an d

.a in t a in e 3 t or ,s t.* e 7','

  • T d u r i n e Wei m a r .

a w_ m. ( b._ _ _! _ rw i .(ASSES S I ZF., ,UG S VOLTS As 3/32 70-100' 20-30 R quired 1/8 110-150 20-30 ( 5/32 150-210 20-30 REM.A.RY.5. l .N.aximas pass width 4 dia. of elec. being p/ ( 4 u ed; clean after each pass, no severe 1 und:rcutting permitted on any intermediate 9 ._ T p2OOCs. ) I l_., ^ I 1 i l I l .i i i t .a 1 f I l i 4 1 i (- 4 INFORMG0" T

\\ THE HOWARD P FOLEY COMPT.NY f 1 i TRANSMITTAL. I YDE NEEDHAM g DA7g [ O[6 f q3 JOB NO. h576 ENGINEERING MANAGER Y SPEC. NO. /TS s, 9 ) gg ernanY TRANSMIT - FGL YOUR APPROVAL FOR YOUR I W IRhk107 -94 l A FOR YOUR RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION Oro=co===ctrveactroa Oron Youn sfcuawnE i l I J ( l ~ THANK /FOU t b ;f1 rQ T 3AT a l.c ; ; v ; ; Krc :*.ED 3/ {' 'th:: ca:c:::AL sIcxca A::a ;;.-c; ;c ' M n% .1 rera v..:. r.i,. l

1 m THE HOWARD P. TC Li.Y..'.M P A?.*'. I ER: I I ORIGINAL sosconre e r : 2... i o2-941 l ( DESCRIPTION: f A-'ACWL'NTS ATE: THE PROCEDURE QCP-SA, WCfDING PROCEDL'H1: SPECIFICATION (WPS) 6 62 IS NM' DLTATIJ:p Yes h No O o-4-83 1 a CORRECTLY 'ac:.D Ac N/g T REMOVED REF. EFF/IR NUMBER: N/A BY DATE WIT I @ ORIT II@/ LOCATION CLASS I O no=-crass I e IREFECTIN CRITERIA: DRAWINC O srectrrc^rro" O raoc=====.E g'.,g;' ;.,; 7. ',,DOCIMER TITLE AND NIBIBER: DELDING AMS D1.1 QCP-5A { DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: (Including Caissa) The Procedure QCP-5A, WPS-62 details a dashed horizontal line on the vertical item on the right side of the sk etch. It is not known the intent of this dashed horizontal line. If the WPS is showing the effective throat of the weld thers this is indeed a Non-conforming condition for it is excessive (Joint penetration) detailed or, the NPS. It is not known what material this WPS is to t.c used on, or has been used on. CONTINUED ON PAGE 2: l ~ A A- - /<~2 kW, m ?" ~ ics-D {' n>-4-82 ( amp 4ATEDBY DATE g J fC. eur g sSA'Ravssd DATE - - E.F. FUEET DISPOSITION: F' g= h g, M:.T _ r- ~ @ a= .~ e,13; 4..; DIE 7061710m 3Y ante p R.,aser navn 3.4 a F.C.6 E. DISPOSITION OR CONCUREDCE: r .i INFORMATION ONLF Recommended Disnosithn

/ f*2-941 THr. HOWARD P. Po!.EY COMPANY 1 880 l JRIGINAL NONCONTORMANCE PIPORT - OctTTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION or: DESCP.IPTION OP NONCONTOF#.ANCE C PAGE 2 OF 2 PROPCSED DISPOSITION; C 9 DISPOS:: TION ACCOMPLICHE'D C DATE s 4-83 l 1 l ' DESCRIPTION OF NCNCONFORMANCE: (Including Cause) COffrINUED FROM PAGE 1 NOTE # 1: Actual Joint Detail performance tests are required por AWS Dl.1-82. The J int Detail and Welding Variables (i.e. Electrode size, Amps, Volts, Welding positions, Root opening, etc.) should be shown on the W.P.S. ~ % 6 2: This information_ is required to make accurate Engineering and Inspectina=- m,.f 3 : The Procedure contains in it's written form 29 em "may be", 3 es "should bet, 1 ee "if necessary",1 ea " preferably", 2 en " reasonably", 3 ea "as practical",1 ea

  • idiere practical",1 es "when practical",1 ea %ere possible",1 ea "as possible",1 3..

possible",1 em "saan general position",1 ea " reasonably smooth.and regular".. v N f W .7 ' V; @jO y r )

f. f I

e , n. T-w k, 3 e p 1 k,. J. . L~. -t % .'.'Y..$ &~1,: -A;' e'ri".. * ?SimAT*V 5 Ee-

3. ~.

...r,,..- 3_..: --.~ G, ve.u v., . x ;_ ..v:., a ~

  • q;%%r., p

.ta.,- g;; q., p.._.m ;, .F ,4.. f ff e ) i

y. 3.z. 7..

i

..__m l, a T.. :. .5- .~ ~ .'.] ,5+ g THE EDWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY ER: @ lGl Q NONCONFORMANCE REPORT -Page L of 1 8902-942 Rev 1 k DESCRIPTION: ATIACEMENTS . PROCEDURE VIOIATION - QCP-5A Paragraph 3.2.1 y,,] 3 { W -83 BOLD IAG # REMOVED REF. EPF/IR NUMBER: N/A BY DATE, UNIT I @ UNIT II@/ LOCATION-J CLASS I NON-CLASS I INSFECTION CRITERIA: DRAWING SPECIFICATION O riocrovRr x DOCUMENT TITLE AID NtatBER: QCP= 6. Para. 4.4s 4.5s 4.5.ls 4.5.2 ~ DESCRIPTION OF NONCONPOEMANCE: (Including Cause) Me Procedure (QCP-5A), Paragraph 3.2.1, states in part, "...the Production Superintendent (is) to insure Production forces under his supervision are kept informed of and are working to the latest requirements specified in QLiality Procedtre." Sie has not been done. Welders are frequently found to be smaware of even the welding procedure specification that they are using. There is no doctanentation, or training records, for some welders being indoctrinated to QCP-5A. ',/ mi AM /0 ~~7$ 1 /O-7*83 agmaam BY DATE j SUPER L isv d DATE R.P. POLET DISPOSITION: i DISPOSITION ET DATE t quALITT REVIER DATE P.C.& E. DISPOSITION 01 CONCURRENCE _I INFORMATION ONL) g P.G.6 E. Co. DATE DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED VERIFIED BY DATE Q.C. SUPERV!SCR DAIE I l

. - a w w. a.

a. ;-..c a, 3

1 t ) /o ,i. a i, y. b a,.3., .e., /$sn :

w. !}An 3 C..Z~ex w

.; s v i l l iy,.; p ivci . ses.,~9pA 'A an on 1/27/s3 i cirra : s'r 39 de r i i l Cr!/li) P. Do N e> r 4 9 *e6 4 a) ire rifs Voioiac-of: -?%'a

  1. rrnceso N. C.it.

ete rest M/ncHsa /-4/4m Rem 7#' 6 &4 i,%,7 0stJerose, b?. /?. It')Lct.>w / 'o, if 'S' ksen y' sJo750 YHH r Twis VotDi>vcr o a' 7#6 4/]c)ua r96Fd esnx60 NciT <5 Ato r twis-7 u)s91 ( Disc.uss'so nwo /9 Gc>eiisa os),4 7 7 +'d,48ciig 174;&c&vcdr. /1667s}&-) Tya cosvraars op rea. s.677y4 is ofsad ; /o,.s'om4 d ie d 4 5 o E 7~ei.E NCR YM*W -rNrfv n)h d ws' vi.s'cusseo. $.fi/41Av' 136L vG 194 i10 ps,,0TH /Ps.Olau) o A 7~ed-tGN T//24 H'. s fo4dy' 4)t%0iNG-f>t?oGFMm lag isd Cl24!/2 s)$4c 4o da$go'e /74f*6*es.oess AN,S'I A A5. 9. tO 1 6 i D6i trhrio4s - ~7~R6' Outy' /9Cido'01/3ca /9ost M 9 5..a.io is' G9 2.3).25' 7eis &cc e,<oraista,I io yaares aLo ,n e .!'~a/ce hc s& s,<20 A> s v.' 1 C it ti.- c Ti o 4 N*e 7d vr < : \\ i \\ .i Nc ? c bl.<2 ~ f.*2 4 s es J i i '.o VO r *) ! v ' / //< M 77s*/ c nu r a i 'g I ,) ..;, > r 'r) i.S i., I L.1, +-,L.,. .rJ v:) i??,T i i i ! q,4.*), g l $ 12 /d%.)- COv ho!.s '.Lt /)!!5<l$ l} /!!'- r <tJ i si! o ' 'o - 1 e y m ;.>. p.,: w -- I

( ELECTRICAL f N2 10066 i UNIT. I 3 THE HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY h UNIT ll Z PRTUCTION EMNEERING DEPT. ENGINEERING DISPOSITION REQUEST j To lm [3 la. s c. o L V Subject MCPKA From k. N 4 o W /C 5 W e / d 8 9 *> Y W e. M G o n r* dl + u o le ts a4Aerwr1e' Problem fY) uj l s o e t, Ji r e c) vea Jor s we a Ir e ) en nitro ni I. e. u o \\ ? l c n i,. iv e 4 s mofor.s e ed. u & r,, r, n r s e r-s t l + a L Ir 4, I, I A o.5 D#, / ) 1 l l l l 1 / l m i n k. /od /7x signed cate Reply EE6-( l l 1 n 11 A &AAAP /OlslG3 signed Oste l 1.~_..._.._._._ v s. l.... l 1 l 1 l l l N I l N.. \\ l \\ \\ _J

I ~ + - ' - - L -. _i.._.__ ur_ w=en_ = =ar w rv=A::v_._._ 1_ d833XR-2 ORIGINAL N NCOWORMANCE REPORT p,,,, j,, 4 1 i @ *; 2 0 ate: l DESCEpf!ON: C-6180 CONN CH i 2-7-83) I! Weld 7A&73 to Ext. Col. IIJ v1 LN ,.. Act:m.::TS (- Plate MX 1 i Elv. 107 ' 30 05-1 833XE-14] ll ii.et i T A., p ( 2T k DAYV*)93 REF. HPF/IR NUMBER [8833XR-14 t f UNIT I Q UNIT IIC / LOCATION MEL HANDLING BI.DG. EL.187' CLASS I@ NON-CLASS I O l' INSPECTIOtl CRITERIA: DRAWING Q SPECIFICATION y PRIV'Fht!RF g j g4 DOCUMENT TITLE AND NUMBER: 6180-F1-13-005: OCP-5A DESCRIPTION OF NoblCONPORMANCE: (Including Cause) The above preheated plate welds were accepted try Quality C-- :-el (cce at+=r h=A HPF/WIS). Upon cooling weld 7A cracked its in11 length, and weld 13 w rme*=d 1/2.its length. (Both 4" welds). Plate (MX A005-1) plate.is w=W.by 2/2".in 20" af.Imuyth. l 9 3 9.5 nd/f - 2 d,5;fN% m TIATEU BY DATE QUALITYJ ANAGER ' DATE " PROJECT'10ANAGER dATE 8 DISPOSITION NmING MEANS TD PREVENT REf"HREFurF; ( Remove Plate A-005-1 and replace. Grind area'of cracked welds flush and liquid penetrant test to enenre that cracks did ncyt propagate into base jl metal. Hold training meeting with Production supervision o intratica montrol. Yn h5 DISPOSITION BY E FADJBCT N& NAGER AATE j MN mP'Jr._ '8 2.*26 O QUALITY p m t.'FR AATE PA61FIC GA8 AND ELECTRIC CO. DATE DISPOSITION ACODIIPLTSNED ~ i PT Mmlished and found a==g*=Ma em 3-3-83 Training meetings held 3-4-B3. d IN ,3 - E E' h . [ 4 4.a h 3-Q-S?, I ' ' ' 3 ss-LTi:i. D T,7 3WE 8t'ri i.. it :iar.;;i tim L quA}7;g ;{G,.g,',. f i ;, !!!! ta.;Atti) l'. Itili.Y C d. ACCEPIANCE PACIFIC CAS A!.D Lt.Lt.J id C t,0. M.Ci l ( ANC.I. /h M M N1Q6 V/Tb l 4 'A .m h '/ / / f)f, }c'. A_ ,..m..- m.- ,. r m,, - Z ~.,,'.l. b

tIVlL G; , pW.' si,, UNIT.7 B f ".p THE HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY UNITlig~ PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DEPT. ' *j,' ,Q ~ ENGINEERING DISPOSITION REQUEST It'uctural Welding Requirements To .' M. Rosse h r kW ~ u J) i [ Problem ] Per specification #8802 welding is to be performed in accordance, t#ith building section rectiirements of' the AWS Welding Code.for ~ 'Structuril Stdei. How er acolicable'secti'on of the AWS Code is no referanced in other iob specifications. It is our understanding that all Structura-1 Q~l' dis'g should conform e

Is this ith the additional requirements of section 8 - Buildings w

hp, l corr'ect ? wA Signed -l k om hb [g [ f .e. u ; V L -.. \\> W. L-.> Rep y WGthsd6 '5 **A L.L-b k. S't k C on.

  • To 44E REdV%REMT V m

TD. 60%

  • db5 b D ""-Tb4 E NdfLAL DU 74E *> ECT I D M kN\\ A]%*QGr.. ".

f e_ e, os sect e%. rus ceos neousa.e m s. coa. e n., e t,es m N MP I k.- dd\\ bbb b bb \\E %O bb b bbbdbb. A 1 signbu.Est Nwe t ' /! Ccd 7 # 98 w osu / 'l C7cf : = :. - Mj l i r _~{._ -l0'.. W '"J- / t x I w i/. LIA ECt' TH s ou7~ ^ 2 \\ ~ \\3 l l - @Ay 3

'jglgl THE HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY vMBER: k802-871Rev.2] N_ONCONPORMANCE REPORT Page 1 of 2 DESCRIPTION: ATTACHMENTS DATE: J WPS#, Weld Rod Size and Type Unverifiable Yes No g 83, HOLD TAG # REMOVED REF. HPF/IR NUMBER: N/A BY DATE j UNIT I x UNIT II x / LOCATION Documentation Files CLASS I x NON-CLASS I INSPECTION CRITERIA: DRAWING ] SPECIFICATION PROCEDURE x DOCUMENT TITLE AND NUMBEK: QCP-5A Rev.9, Para. 13.

2.1 DESCRIPTION

OF NONCONFORMANCE: (Including Cause) ) There are a number of Class I Raceway Support Welds that the Weld Rod Type, Size, and WPS are unverifiable per QCP-5A, Para. 13.2.1. I 1 - dc N i k evn B"A /O /.3 l53 k IIIA%2D BY DATE Q...SUPERTISOR REVIEW DATE ~ J H'.P. FOLEY' DISPOSITION:

1) Welds shall be visually accepted prior to final sign-off of support.

j a) Visual inspection confirms structural integrity of welds.

2) 6010 and 7018 are the only types issued to Electrician Welders.
3) Both 6010 and 7018 are acceptable for use on electrical supports.

e (Continued on next page) j OL W oo /O -/.3= XB k j ell3 fgy ISPOSITION BY DATE ALITY REVIEW WAT V P.G.6 E. 91SPOGPPTON OR CONCURRENCE: l .~ 'b \\Dl t3} s3 g & E. C 'DATE Q DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED ~ N hi VERIFIED BY DATE Q.C. SUPERVISOR DATE

THE HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY p NONCONFOPJiANCE REPORT - CONTINUATION SHEET 3802-871 Rev.2 ( CONTINUATION OF: DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE(I) PAGE 2 OF 1 PROPOSED DISPOSITION O DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED C DATE 0-13-83) H.P. FOLEY DISPOSITION: (Continued)

4) Accept rod size "As Is" if visual inspection is acceptable.

a) Remove and replace weld if lack of fusion is noted.

5) Accept Ht.# "As Is" - Only acceptable filler material is issued to the Rod Control Station.
6) Revise QCP-5A to require the Electrical Welder to enter Size Heat No., and Type of rod used on the applicable " Work Copy" documumentation.

Q.C. to verify it's entry.

7) Record this NCR Number on affected SIWS's or WIS's.
8) Accept missing WPS No. "As Is" based on Item #1), above.

I, e (. t* i" E i k. l

tg.e. oin a s t,[' m ' t L t t l Ml( A L 7 . UNIT I a VT THE HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY i .f . UNIT 11 ' & *3 PR@UCDON ENWNEERING DEPT. l9' ip) r i-3p ?:.' ] LW "h ENGINEERING DISPOSITION REQUEST .-01239DCl-EC-366,f U. Coley/3. Dizon/2. *donterola g h 9 W 5noule ? ~ e-On detail'S 190 (CSn-127-4-52) the recorfaended "fix" can not be Problem done. Do you have an alternate method? On detail S-428 (CS 2-12 7-6-3 4 3) the ueld synbol shows we have to -N wald all the way around. Can ue weld on three sides only? .~ a he' *'em..e k.b tw } Signed Date /~ E / ~ D ,h,eo b, d' "A0'"!I Reply /j) Yd=3,- AJL 0 I M3 Y -a

(

h D?& ( b-/ 70 ) C S2 -/ 2 7 44 W.$ 3 OJ2/<!s n nl/ bl *S b etY W. S M Q Y l Octez) $ c sz -/z y--- -543. ('Y</zi)n / W [nAX./ f MkAW /#%P'72D.,e i,As<3 g J i i 1

y i

1 i I J

..._....-.m......_ Attachment v u <,. - ef,. ' d 4 \\ P<id Ms,wa s -u.w l ac ca au r-- em.rias,- /----- q w,p. 1_ F ~ ~ _,,,,s -,L- -- p- { 4 usu) l L T! Cuse Ts~) 1 AJ6M/ iF/)( f~Cl2 'S f)PPof2 7 420. 4 sR-l2 7-9-5 2. DE TA/L :S-/10 'P< Dc t-sc-s s o*-w and JOR s -iz s t 7b.* ' D cPsrzu (ope up, ars,1 w g sy,,cf p < 4 /,;/ s-ivo.a, y oy,_st 17 enpa,,.,, hy f4 << sM fcl' is saypsiQ os pw cascar ! .c. >w ru eesrein (i -i-n g i . Il Ado 7'l*cre ncoc cas a accmc co. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION pitidyDETMit4ENT B1f #r y DkTEt/n Il3 e.-ise e- .-m.sm>.q,. .e

\\]dt?.:rf/1k'S h\\kNT 4 hg i I sCV e 1 [ i ll I , (Pro (e cd)& ' Suauw s i J j ~,4 y i ih j e-( s pe ce. (irETia4En Wr- ) l <on on we 14 E s.t o'u i l (b*Im h 2 5 pc Q, l$Thkyool*no"1h? To:fD EPs rc e Co Pec.) l -f"OR %ffer [)o. C "s17 - 12 7 4-841 Dr.YaikS-42E TE& Dc l-sc-56o1-f .:r n d M E. 5-/2 5 8 ( l-O/duh B 45/ W Y// S-f brse.e. /E fdecl f E.S fr/defd TrA D SPs TCt$ OPEG} PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. .b'/ den /rse APPROVED FOR ' /'

  • 5 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT en tgi me,t,1,,

n

t L: A % t E M i4 s e A w s w n)) s. 4 rle 1 0 1 _4 i. l .To

cit w;/sn 4m + s.* wc2.*b % y m && q a

~ & p W cl q u ~ apst-6 A ~._.hu s & w & m % ~ su rin/ u,W 4. & m - % y ?.ck."R571.-- ~ w d,8@=h -kb ch~;LJ niu ~w g, n k wx ~t .v p -n g.~ n m ~ 4 ~=+ 9 -. ow pm am np. 7:4e. pl .jdJ ;& s,4,w 4 o s w._ A< w Qd. A 2% A M Ocx~pur-p a g-g.a ,,a a h c "M oJJae'& q % 7" AM \\ g M s~p s,ta..-.. ' .J~A./n y~ s~nt;g *p sat -dJ p &y.m-w ona.2 m A y b2 ya dA x q ' y - 2 p p u p A.- - w- & J~ m eg u yaa A.* c d/ 7' -j ,{ 2.x ya,g u w s, goo aJD mua J oc6% u& r :z4 -ud q.z/ay. - x 3.u s w. m j e w w n a..g % b .La, oc,].,aps t J j /: sdLI?.h. fag -[ O 5:; oc. DjnQ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - _ _ - -. _ - - _ - - - - _ _ _ _ - - _ -. _ ~ - _ _ _. - - - _ _ - _ - - -. _ _ ..A

._.....u_______.._._._....-._...u..2.1-::---------- .h "-Q , 7 36 y fo,; /,l<-9 f&'lb;,s S. w)s, / iSu /li Qnt;/y &.va:soie ~ 0:C. %:c roa.r-(ftl l- 'Y{. hDh ~ h ~ >J 'y /.' Y/ *#k* 0 fA f cera : Dr 30, 6 b'J l( 14 N4e.gGse///; Oo mc. r a:;.cJ.1 cv;7-7, <s Voioi.0c-en Tnu a 77/me&O /V,C.i2. ose 7 n*ii &//acH&O /-4 /9Hr9 l SPc8 7W6 & a i, %,/ /]/<ra c 70se, /.b? $ l' lsb ~' ,hs'o, iY 'i diedIy' A)0Tsa 77m7 7ms VO/Dl'VG O i-( 7&a 4/3 306 t'65 A3 es.ucr50 ivciT < s' 40 r towFr ' n)4s' Discass'sa r1NO '9 GGierisu o&,4 7 7^+A' A80id I?dM*C3 ucdC l g pisrb r ds, -7)/a cou ra, ors op rea. i-67 reg is olffs-e.ad / o,s'o m s d ie s 4 s o ( r//is A/Ct~< 7+'s& TN4r & a! id 4 s' D Ifcir s's'io, fif2tM Z v' I3L5 f.-l JG MA' i st) /)d.,G TH /P&.Vo's4) O A TNd. Siv Tis?6 W. A fol'dy' k)st-or'NG-l2/?oG retam 1.S' iN Cwrxt2. l l'1a 4//4cIsr3 la/7&at /?Jfdat60cris AN,sT H+5. a. io l D&t idorto4s - 7H6 Outy Avi9ab1/3ca A.v.s's x4 s.2.io is' /0 ydims oLQ 9')] ,$$~ 75/$ /$CCfppf4/f6d,5 ~ s.n a e s,ao.uo wlN oinec rioa,os e in.wg n> dea eeo2-n4 xoo ik voiojoc- - 7w erroc,-/so caha 4,, a r,,,4,a as~,;.~~c u,, -..ar-p n p,,.~. o-sm, j~es.z a y,k,4 9M .2. 2

.._.a....._......._.-.;__._u.._, ,aw Uine.+ Q, Q.e. m pek< 5 -l'c, ci;.g' {) ]o :. vet Vcoof; ( .b.QSellt Q.L. .Safr<.ruisor ~ y Rei ' rJcit 25co-43.p VEidWg s lic hies / l 1 contsy %.;n is y re pse s y- /e A a J d

3. se-g 3, youc

. firs ( - c e.c n aeaf e/ W tu ( th tk ocidi ei-_ Nc A(f 8o2-9if/b6. fM M/C-~ 9/ f Nb hM

  1. D td f

C.k f SD f 4 k &,e n +.. p a l f a k s % h a Aa s s aa ;% J Ir[O;[5ot ) as flu Qd j fk. deec_ ~ w4a.se_A tu R. y birecke, has ddemi,4ea yhd fin ro. R.ska he ve:de.l ad obessea kwtif-ilem p (G> meww'N %,,anb.is ( g,.cas.w rNhfs-/o clo sop Qce-3. wikin -h-s secAd ctmcern Jen(4 t.AIfL a. med' ve Youce(fdwybetl[8aveTcEd ed as ha& tWfb 1 4 o. t s e n. W A s u s u u s f k =o n y n e m, r3 ed i =c =.s wk A.c j ad a c. nquis ccme43 yngcA([frct>>-9..I a.gte. fkd fLe_ menno dc>=.5 n d ce. f(ec f x(I Steemd3 Aol-mc a. 7 sgest fhd e t ad h en. k fitt clir u b e? 4k meo-b Ad is dbke # h ncA ina % 2:& m I M w fe ikk Gls c/, Se -iz.i% those atens oAC-Milf 6 COVLCern - ~jk f6tA m ucn cblW sth youc 6 d g +bd in a$h cdee e4 A e*h H.P Foky M Aiq twp m an i.s i n c6. TMs c.owwn shed Lt 3.aate55eA 6 m Wieq od eeQv.eeting vk a (e h Ako.

  • ~

~...c, -% Gne-as k as a n ~' nu eu_ eousz a ysa.,0 _ z sem aus I -/ o#t1 Assane%guursec/gt- & mfso.y and mak 7 -(Lt m2 tarb of Msz xys.a.co

3 wL a 6 kas

,a i M3 mfume lilocory, A6 such) /ko /97.3 edi fi on 't.s os.cyk Mr H.f. feje-y' on fMs sife - ) '~ Jn c.Iosh. 'I wish fc s6de ft,a.h ed asfws%INy for 4a.t;4y lies eiA tLt h%aye.& ad Mc w(le-W w\\ ca&c( ef

k. rai;4y h oycam. %

kan gcesuW sewe. ef your c.ovtceros, W* T04-9 Af av 3 Maviayme.d ha_s . a s. a.a,u.a m n y - -,,.- ( s& ac At decision. M b par repusEhly as Iq=6c & -A -pt uxe_ sf con &4;ons an Ad muupend mwst 4Aress. bp % Tespuk, 4 c.awnof.62. kelA a.ccoual.Me_.fe.c de_clsites ma by you ful Ad Hems ofcouern Mwet. If u - # a aressed qppaWy, _c wrt/ AJp 6 Ic:q n-a,umuu senwdy ~

l P"[glg THE HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY NUMBER: NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Pcgi I cf 2 [8802-871Rsv.2) 1. ) \\ DESCRIPTION: ATTACHMENTS

1) ATE:

5 T.. O No E e -83) / WPS#, Weld Rod Size and Type Unverifiable HOLD TAG # REMOVED 1 REF. HPF/IR NUMBER: N/A BY DATE UNITII{/LOCATIONDocumentationFiles CLASS I @ NON-CLASS I UNIT I x INSPECTION CRITERIA: DRAWING SPECIFICATION PROCEDURE { DOCUMENT TITLE AND NUMBER: QCP-5A Rev.9, Para. 13.

2.1 DESCRIPTION

OF NONCONFOPJd.ANCE: (Including Cause) There are a number of Class I Raceway Support Welds that the Weld Rod Type. Size, and WPS are unverifiabic per QCP-5A, Para. 13.2.1. \\ J aN sh w %,% 1 ~ /O-1,3 -E O ITIAttD BY DATE j SUPEPJISOR REVIEW DATE' H.P. FOLEY DISPOSITION:

1) Welds shall be visually accepted prior to final sign-off of support.

c) Visual inspection confirns structural integrity of welds.

2) 6010 and 7018 are the only types issued to Electrician Welders.
3) Both 6010 and 7018 are acceptable for use on electrical supports.

(Continued on next page) ' 'c a>. n J G /o -is-r )lM.L.-- ieIn/o L/ DISPOSITION BY DATE ALITY REVIEW WATE P.G.& E. -BISPOSITIC+' OR CONCURRENCE: E k! l ~ \\'Of \\'Sl63 P.G.6 E. C 'DATE V' { DISPOSITION ACCOME,,ISHED y d VERIFIED BY r E 4 I,$R ~~ DATE_ _( p,

i .Y . _. _ _. _ _ _. -.. ~ ~. - --- o ,/,J TEE HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY go. NONCONTORMANCE REPORT CONTINUATION SHEET dELO2-871 Rev.2 ' CONTINUATION OT: DESCRIPTION OF NONCONTORMANCE UD ' PAGE 2 OF 1 l PROPOSED DISPOSITION O DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED D DATE 8 B.P. FOLEY DISPOSITION: (Continued)

1. ) Accept rod size "As Is" if visual inspection is acceptable.

a) Remove and replace weld if lack of fusion is noted.

5) Accept Et.# "As Is" - Only acceptable filler material is issued to'the Rod Control Station.
6) Revise QCP-5A to require the Electrical k' elder to enter Size, Heat No., and Type of rod used on the applicable " Work Copy" documumentation.

Q.C. to verify it's entry. 1 (

7) Record this NCR Nu=ber on affected SIk'S's or k'IS's.
8) Accept missing k'PS No. "As Is" based on Item #1), above.

l e ND OBf p 03stgg l 00F: l l l l l I cl i i- - Ei I l i I h_________-.______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20236U101&oldid=3931303"