ML19309D035

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50:no Exemptions to License Should Be Given Until Emergency Reponse Plans Are Deemed Adequate.Nrc Should Reconsider Issuance of CP to Facility
ML19309D035
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/03/1980
From: Seidts M
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-44FR75167, RULE-PR-50, TASK-OS, TASK-SD-906-1 NUDOCS 8004100006
Download: ML19309D035 (1)


Text

-

p g vei m  !

D C) g%

p ;. g;0 itaE

$ M5Moh F. arch 3,1 C EO Sec
etery cf ths Com-ission U.S. Euclear ,~e;ultto:y Cc nitsien Washington, D.C. 2C555 A'.tn: Occketing and Service Eranch

Dear Sir:

I have teen reviewing the P:pposed Eules for emergency planning for th e f.R C , specific:lly Alternatives A& 2. I feel that the Comnissicn's :ecognizing the equivalence of erer ency planning to siting and cesign rcther than being secondary is a plaudible decisicn. Heuever theIe ate areas of these alternatives that need to be ec:e stringent then es prcposed. I feel that no exemptions to license soplicants should be given until these emergency response plans are deemed adequate, not only by the f,RC and lccal goverrment, agencies, but alsc that the emergency re-egense plans can be denonstrated to be practically imple-mented by the public involved.

It is my feeling, and many others, that th e f;R C has used poor judgement in issuing a CCnstructicn pe:mit to the Philadelphia Elect:ic Company to construct it's nuclear facility at Limerick, Penna. I feel that the only way the Ccemission can regain any credibility is to re-consider this action. This plant it sited in the tai:d most densely populated area for a 10 -ile zadius in the United States and is sited the closest tc a metrcpolitan area--Philadelphia, uhich is 21 -iles auny. It is overall less than SCT. cceplete- Unit 1 is S5% complete and Unit 2 is 35C cceplete. Continuing this construction and issuing an operating license to Philadelphia Electric Co. vill cnly enhance the ";:eenlight organizetion" image of the Ccneission for the nuclear industry. I would appreciate your response to my comments. Thank you very much.

1 Sincerely, ,

W&&. d!A f a, m ., M .e,4 Marlene C. Seidts .,

. J U. 7 Stars Ed. ,1

& _A6 M %yf . Pncenixville, Pa.

(' g' l {

.c y l

'=uSC

  1. N q

A

% -9 w eedo r e..d. e ; ,y  % , % E

'I 9.e cf r ef.erwary 1

w : smics N I' ' e 8004100006