IR 05000302/1979050

IE Insp Rept 50-302/79-50 on 791203-07.Noncompliance Noted: Failure to Maintain Training Program

ML19312D073
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	01/07/1980
From:	Andrews D, Jenkins G, Taylor P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML19312D060	List: IR 05000302/1979050 ML19312D058 ML19312D062 ML19312D066 ML19312D070
References
50-302-79-50, NUDOCS 8003190751
Download: ML19312D073 (14)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

M o,,

UNITED STATES

[T E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

1\\

'

-g j

REGION 11

.

o

-

101 MARIETTA ST., N.W SUITE 3100

~ ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303

.....

Report No.i50-302/79-50 Licuse... Florida Power-Corporation 3201 34th Street, South

- St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 Facility Name:. Crystal River, Unit No. 3 Docket No. 50-302

~ License No. DPR-72 Inspection at. Crystal River sit ear Crystal River, Florida Y

'., '

/~ Y-8 d Inspectors:9 gw D. J. Perrattd Date Signed

,

/1.

a / /,

/~ Y-D P. A. Taylof Date Signed

) f b<dwvt

//v/ra D. L.

Date Si ned f,u

// I

Approved by-

'

-

- C R.

in's, Acting Section Chief, FFMS Branch Date Signed

~

SUMMARY Inspection on December. 3-7, 1979

- Areas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved 94 inspector-hours on site and offsite in the areas of coordination with offsite support agencies; emergency facilities, equipment and procedures; means for determining a release; emergency _

-training; fire brigade organization and training; emergency organization; 'IE Bulletin 79-18; emergency' drills;- licensee QA audits and follow-up on previous inspection findings.

Results

. 0'f ' the ' ten ' (10)l inspected, no items of noncompliance _ or deviations were areas identified in ~ nine (9) areas;' one apparent item of noncompliance was found in-

-

one _ area -(Failure to maintain training program as required by administrative

'

- procedure A.I. 800-Paragraph 8.e).

8003190 9M

.

-. - -.. - -

..

. cg.,

'

^

^

'

~ - ~ ~ ^

-

~

....w

. -.. -

-.

.. -..

'

.;

.

<'"

.

,

,~

'

,

,

DETAILS'

-

.

.1.

Persons Contacted'

.

,

Licensee Employees s

• D.;Poole, Plant Manager

• P. McKee,' Operations Superintendent

'

• J. Cooper, Jr., Compliance QA/QC Manager -

'

.

• J.: Wright,-ChemRad-Protection Engineer

*R. Kennedy,. Nuclear Compliance Engineer

• G. Williams,-QA/QC' Supervisor

~

g*L.'. Tittle, Performance Engineer Supervisor ;

,

• J.-Parrish, Maintenance Engineer-P.-Baynard, Manager,' Nuclear Support Services J.~C. Hobbs,-Chairman, Nuclear General Review Committee

3 JP, Griffith, Training Coordinator-T.

Miller, Training Specialist-

-F. Pleubell; Supervisor, Electrical Department lK. Lancaster, Compliance Engineer

. B. Jones, Shift ~ Supervisor, Crystal River 1 and 2 H. -.Embach, Shift Supervisor, Crystal River 1 'and 2 G. Perkins, Supervisor, Health Physics-G. Rurzala,-Manager, Radiological Waste R.'Cunningham,'I&C Planning Coordinator.

,

Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included three (3)

technicians,-three (3) operators and two (2) office personnel.

J

'Other Organizations

'Dr. S.' Miller, M.D., Medical Consultant

G.1 Allen, Director, Citrus County' Civil Defense B.'Jonesf Dispatch Supervisor, Citrus County Fire Department M. Connell, Chief, Fire Prevention, Citrus County Fire-Department H. Williams, Chief Deputy, Citrus County Sheriff's Office J. Pelham, Chief, Crystal River Police Department GJ Yoachum, Administrator,. Seven Rivers Community Hospital F.LBoulos, Nurses Supervisor, Shands Teaching Hospital iE.' Tibbs, Consultant,' Southern Science Corporation

-

'

• Attended exit-interview.

~2.'.

. Exit Interview

-

The inspection' scope andTfindings were summarized on December 7, 1979, with those ~ persons. indicated in ' Paragraph -1 - above. With respect to. the item of-noncompliance discussed in Paragraph 8.e and the three ' unresolved items -

.

,

discussed lin' Paragraphs 5.e, : 8.f and 10.c, the ~ plant manager acknowledged 4the' inspector's findings.

E

.

-

-

.,.

,

,-

,,

---,v

,,y,,

. - - ~ _ +

'

n,

~.. _ _... _

_

-

-

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

'

.

.

,;

.

w-t

,,

. ct-2-~

L

.

.

.

-

3.

Licensee Action on-Previaus Inspection Findings (Closed) Item.of noncompliance (50-302/79-07-01), Failure to have adequate

' auxiliary building ' evacuation alarm audibility.

The licensee has taken corrective action for the radiation control area. Other areas of the plant with high noise levels are under study. The licensee's continued corrective action will be ' reviewed in accordance with IE Lulletin 79-18 as discussed in Paragraph '13.

(Closed) ' Item of noncompliance (50-302/79-07-03), Personnel portal monitor at guard house inoperable. -The corrective actions stated in Florida Power

. Corporation letter Serial No.

3-0-3-a-2, dated April 9, 1979, has been completed.

. (Closed) Open item-n (50-302/77-24-01), Renewal of agreement letters with offsite agencies.. This matter _was reviewed and changed from an open item

- to an unresolved item as discussed in Paragraph 5.e.

(Closed) Open item (50-302/77-24-11), Audit of emergency plan biennially.

The emergency plan was audited within the past two years under the cognizance

,

of the Nuclear General Review Comc:ittee.

~4.

Unresolved-Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve noncompliance or devi-ations. New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in Paragraphs 5.e, 8.f and 10.c.

-

- 5.

Coordination with Offsite Support Agencies

...

- This area was reviewed with respect to the licensee's commitments to a.

-

maintain contact and coordination with the offsite agencies as described in the Emergency Plan.

t b.

. The inspector reviewed the licensee's Emergency Procedures, written letters of agreement with offsite support agencies and the list of ~

~

offsite support agencies specified in the Emergency Plan to verify -

that:

' (1): Detailed procedures have been established describing methods for notifying Local, State,- Federal officials and other offsite support -

agencies.in the event of a radiation emergency.

--(2)

Arrangements for the services of-a physician and other medical personnel qualified to ; handle radiation emergencies have - been

'

established.

~

l s,+.

l

-

i w_

.

.

. - -.

-

- - _ -..- - - - - - - - - - - _ - - _ - _ _ - _ - _

_

E

.

M..

-3--

.

.(3) Arrangementsj for the transportation and treatment of injured or contaminated individuals at'a treatment facility outside the. site boundary have been established.

.c.

The.. inspector contacted four 'offsite ~ agencies and met-with officials of-these agencies to verify that contact is being maintained by the licensee and that services, as described in the letter of agreement,

. can be provided.

d. - JThe inspector used the following acceptance criteria for the inspection and evaluation of the above areas.

(1) ;10 CFR 50, Appendix E, paragraph IV.D.

(2) Emergency Plan, Sections 3.2, 3.2.7 and 5.1.2.

-(3) Crystal-River 3, Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Section 12.b.

'

..

Within the areas inspected, no' items of noncompliance or deviations were identified. One' unresolved-item was identified and is discussed in Paragraph 5.e below.

'

From a review 'of agreement letters in Section 12.b of the FSAR and e.

discussions. with representatives of the licensee and offsite support agencies, an inspector determined that no updated -agreements were in effect' for 'Dr. Miller and Seven Rivers Hospital (primary offsite.

medical support as ' defined by the Emergency Plan). On December 5, 1979, the inspector, accompanied by FPC Manager of_ Nuclear Support Services, met with-Dr. Miller and the administrator for Seven Rivers

'

Hospital. The inspector noted that both individuals were very receptive to-establishing new a' greement letters with the licensee. This matter-was discussed with licensee management representatives at the exit interview. The inspector pointed out that Appendix E to 10 CFR 50

- requires that ' the licensee maintain agreements with offsite support agencies. The' licensee stated this matter would be -looked into, and that ~ he establishment of Seven Rivers Hospital as primary support t

'

- would improve the ' effectiveness of the medical plan. The inspector acknowledged the. licensee's remarks and-stated that this matter, which was previously identified by an inspector as an open item-(IE Report LNo.~50-302/77-24-01), would be' changed to an unresolved item (50-302/

79.-50-01).

Subsequent to the inspection,.on' December 11', 1979, the inspector was contacted via telephone by a licensee representative from FPC Nuclear

~'

. Support Services, and informed that letters. of ~ agreement for two

. doctors -and Seven Rivers Hospital would be established by January 1,

~1980.

_

..

M

'

,...__-.._-a---~-w-

- --- - ---- ---

,

,

___

f,

-

,

l: ~

,

-4-N.

6.

Facilities, Equipment, and Procedures

a; Changes to Facilities, Equipment and Procedures

'

(1)~ The. inspector reviewed established management controls and inter-

'

viewed licensee personnel to determine if. changes had been made to the emergency plan, emergency' procedures, emergency facilities and equipment since the last inspection.

-(2). The review -of this area, with respect to changes, was conducted

' to verify that:

(a) Chariges did not constitute an unreviewed safety question'.

(b)- Changes. did not alter the requirements set forth in the Emergency Plan.

(c) Changes were reviewed and approved in accordance with established plant procedures.

.

(d) The Emergency Plan - notification roster (names, telephone numbers), organization and ' listed personnel specifically qualified for coping with emergencies were updated at the required intervals.

(e) Required plant committee review and QA audits of the Emergency Plan were conducted.

(f) Revisions to the Emergency Plan and Emergency Procedures were-distributed to the required location at the facility.

(3) The inspector used the following acceptance criteria for the inspection and evaluation of the above areas.

(a) 10 CFR 50.59.

(b) Technical Specifications 6.5.1.6.j, 6.5.2.8.a, and 6.5.2.9.e.

(c) Emergency Plan, Sections 1.0, 2.3, 3.2, 4.2.8 and 5.4.

Within the' areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations

,

were identified. - One open item was identified and is discussed in

_

paragraph 6.'a(4) below.

'

-(4) Sections'- 2.3, 3.2, 4.2.8 K and 5.4 of the Emergency Plan, EM-100, refer.to Section 12.b - of the FSAR for-details concerning the corporate offsite. emergency organization, available local and

-

state support. capabilities,' letters of agreement and the hospital support plan,. respectively. From a review of Section 12.b of the

'FSAR, -an inspector determined _ that these parts of the plan were out of,date. Furthermore,. a review of Procedure Review Records Jfor EM-100 verified that< in March: 1978, the Emergency Plan

,_

-.

..:

.

.

n

a

,9

-

a

,

v

_

-

.,

.

t

.' i

,

_

e

!

'

(excluding.the four abovementioned appendices) was withdrawn from the FSAR and established as Elf-100. Section 1.0 of EM-100 states

'

'

y that, "this procedure.has been developed to provide'a. method for revision of the CR-3 Emergency Plan specified in FSAR Section 12.b.

As a result, this procedure is intended to supercede FSAR Section 12.B".

The inspectorypointed out that under these conditions, letters of agreement, support plans and details of offsite support j

', ',,

capabilities would probably not be.. reviewed nor updated on a l'

periodic ' frequency.. This matter was thoroughly discussed with'

l licensee representatives who.have responsibilities in the area of offsite support coordination. _The Manager of Nuclear Support Services acknowledged the inspectors remarks regarding review and updating of the entire EM-100, and stated that this matter would

'

be '_taken care.of by establishing the FPC Offsite Radiological Support Plan' a's a new procedure, NNSD-17, and incorporating the letters of agreement,-the Florida State Emergency Plan and the iShands Teaching Hospital Emerjency Plan as appendices to EM-100, which is undergoing a enjor revision at the present time. At thi exit meeting the ' inspector informed licensee management

'

.

' representativestif the above discussions.

The Plant Manager stated that this matter would oe looked into.

.

This matter will remain open, to be reviewed during the next inspection (50-302/79-50-02).

,

b.

Emergency Kits (1) The inspector reviewed selected calibration, and inventory records along with a physical inspection and inventory of emergency kits and equipment located in the main control room nuclear plant, main control room' fossil plant, plant emergency vehicle, had emergency assembly center. Types _ of emergency equipment selected for inspec-

-

tion and inventory included self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), respirators, survey meters, air samplers, communication

~

equipment, control center instrumentation, emergency kit supplies, pocket dosimeters, _and pocket dosimeter chargers.

(2) Ths review and' inspection of emergency kits and equipment was conducted to verify that:

(a) Periodic inventory and calibratiori of emergency equipment and emergency kits were being conducted.

-(b). The physical condition af.c content of emergency kits and supplies are being maintained in a state of readiness.

(c) ' The emergency k'its, supplies, and portable instrumentation

' are at various: locations as required by the Emergency Plan

~ and Emergency Procedures.

,

t

..

--.

.,

.

. _ _ _ _.. _

.

.

-

-

-

-

.

-

.

.

.

-6-

_..

(3)' The inspector used the foll'owing acceptance criteria for the inspection and evaluation of the above' areas:

(a)

10' CFR 50, Appendix E,Section IV.F.

(b) Emergency Plan, EM-100, Section 6.0 and Figure 6.1.

'Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations-were identified. Commitments in the area of emergency kits are discussed in Paragraph 6.b.(4) below.

(4) The inspector.noted that the licensee inventories the contents of various emergency. kits and lockers on a quarterly frequency and bases' these inventory. checks on the emergency supplies and equipment tabulated in Emergency Plan EM-100, Figure 6.1.

It was noted that EM-100, paragraph 6.1.2 listed additional emergency supplies and equipment to be at the Emergency Assembly Center and

.is not included in the quarterly inventory checks.

This area was reviewed with the licensee at the exi~t interview.

The licensee stated that a review would be conducted and the additional equipment delineated in EM-100, paragraph 6.1.2 would be added to the quarterly inventory checklist by March 1,1980.

Until the licensee review and implementation has been completed, this matter will remain open and will be inspected at a future date (50-302/79-50-03).

a.

'~

c.

Main Control Room Habitability (1) This area was reviewed with respect to maintaining the main control room habitable. The Emergency Plan defines this area as the center for conducting emergency operations during emergency conditions.

(2) The inspector reviewed surveillance test records, calibration data, t

-

channel checks, and system alignment to verify that:

~(a) The control room emergency ventilation system is properly aligned.

(b) The required operability tests are being performed on the control room emergency ventilation system at the required frequency, including system automatic start upon receiving a

. safety injection signal.

(c) The control room. air temperature checks and pressurization test'had been performed at required intervals and surveillance Ldata was satisfactory.

- (3)'. The inspector made a physical review of food and' water supplies

'

atored in the control room which are described in *ae Emergency Plan.

.

-

.

- -

_

'

.

.

.

-7-

,

(4) The inspector verified by observation that readouts or displays for air temperature, radiation and control L room differential pressure were located in the control room.

(5) The inspector used ' the following ac :eptance criteria for the inspection and evaluation of the above areas:

(a) Emergency Plan, EM-100, Section 2.4.1 and 4.2.9 (b) Technical Specification 4.7.7.1 (c) Surveillance Procedures SP-186 and SP-353 Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

.d.

Remote Shutdown Panel (1) This area was reviewed with respect to insuring that the required plant' parameters and controls as described in the Final Safety Analysis Report can be used to perform an emergency shutdown of the plant in the event the main control room canr.ot be manned.

(2) The inspector reviewed surveillance test records, calibration data, channel checks, and performed physical inspections to verify that:

,

i (a) The specified Emergency Procedures were at the remote shutdown room and were up to date.

(b) The calibration and channel checks fo. pressurizer pressure, pressurizer level, steam generator pressure and steam generator level had been done at the required frequency.

(3) The. inspector used the following acceptance criteria for the

,

inspection and evaluatiou of the above areas:

'(a) Technical Specification 4.3.3.5 (b) Emergency Procedure, EP-113 (c) Surveillance Procedure, SP-161

,Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations

were identified.

'e.

E.7

ency Communications (1) ~ This area was - reviewed with respect to licensees commitment to maintaf n and have available various types of communication systems -

withinLthe_ plant for both normal and emergency use as is described

' in the' Emergency Plan.

.s

+

,

-

---

_-

..

.

.

.

-8-

.

s (2)

'

The inspector observed the physical location of communications in the main control room, and remote. shutdown room to, verify the availability of the communication systems are as required by the Emergency Plan.

(3) The inspector reviewed records to verify that the plant emergency alarm tests have been satisfactorily performed at the required frequency.

(4) The inspector used the following acceptance criteria for the Einspection and evaluation of the above areas:

(a)

10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.A (b). EM-100, Section 2.5 (c)~ Operating Procedure, OP 704 Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or dev'iations were identified.

f.

Seismic Instrumentation (1) This area 'was reviewed with respect to licensee requirement to have seismic instrumentation on vital pieces of equipment and readout and/or annunciation in the control room as specified in the Final Safety Analysis Report.

(2) The inspector reviewed surveillance test data, calibration data and channel checks to verify seismic' instrumentation has been maintained in a state of operability.

.

(3) The inspector used the following acceptance criteria for the

"

inspection and evaluation of the above area:

'(a) -Technical Specifications 3.3.3.3, 4.3.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.3.2 (b) Surveillance Procedure, SP.336 (c) Emergency Procedure, EP 109

~ Within the areas-inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

-g.

Medical and Decontamination Facilities (1) This area was' reviewed with respect to the licensee commitment to provide emergency first aid and personnel decontamination facilities,

'

~

-including medical supplies and equipment for first aid treatment,

'

which are described in the Emergency Plan.

_.

_ _ _ _ - _. _, _

. - -

~ - -

- - - - - - -.

.

_

, _

m y

.

'*.

,

.

-9-

,

.

.

~

'(2).The inspector-performed a phys'ical inspection of equipment and

-

supplies at the first aid. room -and ' decontamination facility and

. inspected equipment and supplies for personnel decontamination to verify that: -

'-(a). Emergency. equipment and. supplies were in good condition and.

available in specified areas and required quantities.

(3). The. inspector used -the following acceptance criteria for the

-

~ inspection and evaluation of the above' areas:

(a) 10 CFR;50, Appendix E,Section IV.F (b) EM-100, L Sections 2.2, 5.0, 6.4 and 7.2 (c) Emergency Procedure, EM-213

- Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified. Licensee commitments in the area of medical sup-plies are discussed in paragraph 6.h(4) below.

. (4) gt was - noted by the. inspector 'that certain medical supplies and equipment, recommended by the local physician to be available on-site for his use - in emergencies, are not being routinely verified. Licensee management agreed that an inventory procedure for'these items should be developed and. stated that a procedure would be implemented by March'1 1980. This item will remain

,

open, to be reviewed during a future inspection (50-302/79-50-04).

'7.

Means for Determining a Release This area was reviewed with respect to :the licensee's commitments as a.

-described in the Emergency Plan for-determining the magnitude of a release of radioactive material and the criteria for ~ determining when l

,

protective measures should be considered within and outside the site

- boundary.

b..

The. inspector performed an inspection of_ instrumentation in the control room and reviewed records for instrumentation calibration', channel checks, functional test and alarm set points to verify that readouts i

for Lwind Lspeed, direction,; temperature and area and process monitors

.

were operable and available as required by the Emergency Plan.

(c.

The inspector.used the following acceptance criteria for the inspection L

~

_

. and evaluation of the above area:

'

>

(1): 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section 'IV.C t.

(2)- LEmergency Plan, EM-100, Section 4=

-(3) ; Emergency Procedure EM-204

,

L(4) Surveillance Procedure, SP-335

.

-(5). Operating' Procedure, OP-701

.

_4

"

. ithin the areas Einspec'ted,' no ' items of noncompliance.' or deviations-W

-

'

were identified.

'

s

.

,

-

.'

t [1

-

,jg

,

3.,

s e -,

+

.-

.. ~,

--~.,....

. - * - - +.... ~,.,,. +. - -.

.

-

-

,.

....+:+u w...

-

-

-

'-

,

t '-

,

,

-

.

1 g.

..

.

.

.

,

-

c

.

I I

W-10--

..

!

>

,

• -

g.

, Emerge'ncy Training

'

a.-

This area was ' reviewed. with respect to the ' licensee's commitments as

~

described in, the ; Emergency Plan to conduct emergency training for

licensee! employees who are assigned specific authority and responsi-bility in the event of an emergency.

b.

'The inspector reviewed personnel training records. along with training

,

'

L schedules and training course content to. verify that:

'

(1)' Emergency training had been given to the following categories of

'

-personnel: -emergency coordinators, emergency team. leaders, emergency. team members and general employees.

(2) Personnel are informed of changes in Emergency Plan and Emergency

. Proc.edures.

(3) ' Refresher training had.been given as specified in Administrative Instruction AI-S00.

,

i

' (4). The training' courses covered the material specified by the Emergency Plan or Procedures.

~ The inspe_ctor interviewed four individuals from the above categories c.

to verify that training had been provided as documented in the training

"

records.

d.

The inspector used the following acceptance criteria for the inspection and ~ evaluation of the above area:

(1)

10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.H

,(2) Emergency Plan EM-100 (3) Administrative Procedures AI-100, AI-700 and AI-800 As a result of this review, the inspector identified one item of non-

'

compliance in the ~ area of training-for the. Emergency Medical-Team and an unresolved item. regarding the orientation and training of

'

fossil plant personnel. These' items are discussed in Paragraphs. 8.e

- and 8.f below.

.

~~~

The - inspector met with licensee supervision to discuss ' first aid e.

. training with - respect to. members of the Emergency Medical Team.. The inspector was -informed that first aid retraining was deficient for members of the Emergency Medical, Team.

'

cThe inspector reviewed ths Emergency Medical Team training program as-I

_ ; described L-in.' Administrative Instruction i AI-800, Section 7.4.5. and examined training records'ofiteam members who are identified in Emer-

,

Y

. ency Procedure EM-206, " Emergency Plan Roster and Notification".

g

y s

'

I e

,

-

b'l

e

e

,-

.

.

-11-

-

' The inspector: determined as a result of. this review that Emergency

' Medical Team members, consisted primarily of Shift Supervisors (6),

Control Room personnel (5), and Chem-Rad personnel (26). The method for providing first aid training is the Red Cross Multi-Media course which leads to 'a three-year certification. Records of this training were not. available for review, except one individual;- however, licensee supervision stated that the Red Cross Multi-Media course was given approximately December 1975 and again during the first' part of 1976.

In addition, the inspector determined that the annual training courses specified in AI-800, Enclosure 3 for Medical Team members was not received by Shift Supervisors during 1979.

These matters were discussed with the licensee at the exit interview.

The !1icensee acknowledged the inspector's concerns _ and stated that this area of training, as well as other plant training, had been reviewed by a subcommittee established by the licensee's Nuclear General Review Committee.

The inspector acknowledged the licensee remarks and stated that feilure to implement and maintain the Emergency Medical Team training program as specified by Administrative procedure AI-800, section 7.4.5 as required by Technical Specification 6.8.1.e constitutes an item of noncompliance (302/79_50-05).

f.

The inspector noted that fossil plant personnel have assigned duties during a radiological emergency as specified by Emergency procedure EM-214.

In addition to these duties, an emergency kit and locker containing radiological measuring devices and protective equipment is available for use by fossil plant control. room operators during an emergency.

As a result of interviews with fossil plant personnel and licensee supervision, it was determined that orientation and training on the use of.the emergency kit and locker content have not been conducted recently and no formal training program is established in this area.

.

.These matters were discussed.with the licensee at the exit interview.

The licensee stated that this area would be reviewed and a training

- program inglemented by March 1,1980. This item shall remain unresolved

,

to be~~ inspected at a future date (302/79-50-06).

'

9.

Emergency Drills a.

This area was reviewed with respect to licensee's commitments as described in the Emergency Plan for the planning,' execution and eval-sation of emergency drills.-

.b.

The inspector reviewed records and discussed with a licensee represen-

tative the most recently conducted _ drills in the areas of a full-scale radiation emergency drill and medical emergency to verify that:

(1) jThe required drills were performed at the prescribed frequency.

l i

__ _

-u dy4 See.

1. M

.. -

..

.

.e-12-

, *

.

(2)' Appropriate corrective actions are being initiated to correct identified deficiencies.

.(3)- Changes to the Emergency Plan or Procedures, an a result of

_ deficiencies identified during the drill, have been reviewed and approved by licensee management.

(4) Changes were. issued to persons, organizations, and support organi-zations.

. The inspector used the following acceptance criteria for the inspection c.

and evaluation of the above area:

(1) 10 CFR 50, ippendix E, paragraph IV.I (2) Emergency Plan, Section 7.3 Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

,

10.

Fire Brigade Organization and Training

.

The inspector reviewed the licensee's implementing procedure on fi';e a.

brigade organization, training program provided, and reviewed individual training records for the fire brigade team members to verify that:

"..

(1) The initial fire brigade training was conducted for new team inembers.

-

(2) The fire team roster is maintained in emergency procedure EM-206.

(3) Refresher fire brigade team training is conducted at specified-frequency.

(4) The required number of fire brigade team members are maintained onsite at all times.

b.-

The inspector used the following acceptance criteria to inspect and evaluate the above area:

(1) Technical Spcifications 6.2.2.f, 6.4.2 and 6.8.1.f (2) Fire Protection Plan. EM-101, Section 5.2.3 Within the^ areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified. ~ One unresolved item was identified.by an inspector and is discussed.in paragraph 10.c below.

The inspector reviewed QA Audit, QP'-171, and noted that the licensee

'c.

had identified three items (initial fire training, refresher fire

_

training and fire drills). -The inspector reviewed fire brigade training

,

records for the first, second and third quarters of 1979, and-determined nr.

.

.

_

_

___

..

_.

~_

-

.

~.

,

'

.;

,

.

-13-

- +

.

I

~

that.14fof 53 fire brigade members had : received the first quarter-refresher. training as required by Technical Specification 6.4.2.

The inspector reviewed-QP-171,, Audit Response, and noted that corrective

~

action had been completed for items 1 and 2, and that item 3 would he in compliance by January _1,1980.

' This1 matter will remain an unresolved item pending the completion of

'

corrective action for item 3 and a follow-up review of all three items by the NRC (50-302/79-50-07).

.

11.

Emergency Organization a.

This area was reviewed with respect to the licensee's commitment as described in the Emergency Plan, for developing the organizations for

_

coping with radiation emergencies.

,

b.

The inspector reviewed ' licensee's organization charts, Emergency

' ~

. Rosters, Emergency Procedures' and interviewed licensee ar nagement

~

representatives to verify that:

.

~(1) Specific authority, responsibilities and duties have been defined

.and assigned for onsite FPC emergency organization, offsite FPC emergency organization,: and specified outside support agencies.

-(2) The individuals assigned on the emergency call list is current as to names, addresses, and telephone numbers.

,The inspector used the following acceptance criteria for the inspection and evaluation of this area:

'

(1)- 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, paragraph IV.A (2) ' Emergency Plan, Section 2.2 f

Within the areas inspected, no items of noncomplianct. or deviations

~

were identified.

s -

- 12. - Audits -

The inspector examined the licensee's Quality Assurance Audit No. QP-147 a.

F conducted on February 9-13, 1978, which was an inspection =in the areas.

of Emergency Planning and Emergency Procedures. : The inspector noted that

.

three unsatisfactory items were identified during the audit. The inspector

,

reviewed documentation which verified that corrective action was taken,

.

.thereby closing out the audit items..

13; Follow-Up on IE Bulletins

-

'IE Bulletin 79-18, Audibility of Evacuation Alarm in High Noise Areas, a..

~

,

- was reviewed and discussed with a liansee representative. - An inspector

noted that'this' matter was: originally-identified'as an item of noncom-i pliance - (IE Report. No. ' 50-302/79-07).. Follow-up-on-this matter was

_

,

'

,

i

.,,

s.

j

'

-

-. - -

.. -

..

,-

. - - -. -.

. -

....

--

..

~

-

-

+ '

.

J

...

,

.

-14-

_.;.

.,

.

.

.

.

performed by an inspector during a previous inspection (IE Report No.

. 50-302/79-11). 'During this inspection'an inspector was informed that

~

corrective action was completed. for the Radiation Control Area under j

Work. Order 04722, which. was closed out on May -23,1979. However, as

discussed in FPC letter = to the NRC, file number 3-0-3-a-4, dated i

September 21, 1979, the-licensee committed to an. engineering study for

- a communication system upgrade for the very high noise areas of the plant.

Following the completion of the study on October 31, 1979, a schedule for

. installation was to be' determined.

.

Subsequent to the inspection, on December 13, 1979, telephone contact was made with a. representative of Southern Science, a consultant to FPC. The inspector was' informed that the study was completed on time,

- and that following a comment period, a work order would be established with a proposed date of March '12,- 1980, for implementation of the new system.

b.-

This matter is considered to be an open item, pending a review of the installation of the upgraded communication system (50-302/79-50-08).

.

'O a

l t

a

?

E

~

,

I

-

4 - -

m e--

-

,

,

gv.-