ML20059B268

Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/93-24 on 931115-23 & Notice of Violation.Violation of Concern Because Corrective Actions Implemented When Violation Initially Identified by Staff Not Effective in Preventing Recurrence

ML20059B268
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	12/28/1993
From:	Pederson C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Gipson D DETROIT EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20059B269	List: IR 05000341/1993024 ML20059B268 ML20059B276
References
NUDOCS 9401040061
Download: ML20059B268 (2)

See also: IR 05000341/1993024

Text

.

()UO

m

!

DEC 2 81993 f

,

Docket No. 50-341 ,

The Detroit Edison Company

ATIN: D. R. Gipson

Senior Vice President r

Nuclear Generation -

6400 North Dixie Highway  ;

Newport, MI 48166

'

Dear Mr. Gipson:

SUBJECT: FITNESS FOR DUTY INSPECTION AT THE FERMI 2 FACILITY

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. G. Pirtle of this office

between November 15-23, 1993. The inspection included a review of authorized  !

activities for your Fermi 2 facility. At the conclusion of the onsite

'

inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff .

identified in the enclosed report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures

and representative records, and interviews with personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared .i

to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of

~

'

Violation (Notice). The violation is of concern because corrective actions

implemented when the violation was initially identified by your staff were not

effective in preventing recurrence.-We are also concerned about the. lack of.

attention to detail in reference to documentation pertaining to security

compensatory measures. This deficiency was also noted during the previous

inspection of the security program (Section 2.g of Report Details).

!

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response. In your

response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional

actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this i

Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future

inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is' l

necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements. 1

The response directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as .;

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511. i

!

l

! i

L j

l

030037 /> 1

l

9401040061 931228  !

'

PDR ADOCK 05000341

G PDR: 4

l

'

l 1

(l:

'

,

,

.

..

The Detroit Edison Company 2 DEC 2 81993

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of *

'

this letter, the enclosure, and your response to this letter will be placed in

the NRC Public Document Room.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.  ;

Sincerely,

Orliinal Signed By William Snell

Cynthia D. Pederson, Chief

Reactor Support Programs Branch

i

Enclosures:

1. Notice of Violation

2. Inspection Report ,

No. 50-341/93024(DRSS)  ;

cc w/ enclosures: '

John A. Tibai, Principal

Compliance Engineer

P. A. Marquardt, Corporate

Legal Department

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspector, RIII

James R. Padgett, Michigan Public

Service Commission

Michigan Department of

Public Health

Monroe County Office of <

Civil Preparedness

Fermi, LPM, NRR

E. G. Greenman, RIII  !

1

I

bec: PUBLIC 1

i

l

l

RII RIII RIII

RdbI

Pirtle/jp

n

P li s

e

greed

,a

Pederson

12/28/93 /> f S ^

l

,

- -. .- ~