ML20059B268
| ML20059B268 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 12/28/1993 |
| From: | Pederson C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Gipson D DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20059B269 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9401040061 | |
| Download: ML20059B268 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000341/1993024
Text
.
()UO
m
!
DEC 2 81993
f
,
Docket No. 50-341
,
The Detroit Edison Company
ATIN:
D. R. Gipson
Senior Vice President
r
Nuclear Generation
-
6400 North Dixie Highway
Newport, MI 48166
Dear Mr. Gipson:
'
SUBJECT:
FITNESS FOR DUTY INSPECTION AT THE FERMI 2 FACILITY
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. G. Pirtle of this office
between November 15-23, 1993. The inspection included a review of authorized
!
activities for your Fermi 2 facility. At the conclusion of the onsite
inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff
'
.
identified in the enclosed report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within
these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures
and representative records, and interviews with personnel.
Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared
.i
to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of
~
Violation (Notice). The violation is of concern because corrective actions
'
implemented when the violation was initially identified by your staff were not
effective in preventing recurrence.-We are also concerned about the. lack of.
attention to detail in reference to documentation pertaining to security
compensatory measures. This deficiency was also noted during the previous
inspection of the security program (Section 2.g of Report Details).
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.
In your
response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional
actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this
i
Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future
inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is'
necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
1
The response directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
.;
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
i
l
!
i
L
j
l
030037
/>
1
9401040061 931228
ADOCK 05000341
'
G
PDR:
4
l
1
'
l
(l:
'
,
,
. ..
The Detroit Edison Company
2
DEC 2 81993
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosure, and your response to this letter will be placed in
'
the NRC Public Document Room.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
Orliinal Signed By William Snell
Cynthia D. Pederson, Chief
Reactor Support Programs Branch
i
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Report
,
No. 50-341/93024(DRSS)
cc w/ enclosures:
'
John A. Tibai, Principal
Compliance Engineer
P. A. Marquardt, Corporate
Legal Department
OC/LFDCB
Resident Inspector, RIII
James R. Padgett, Michigan Public
Service Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health
Monroe County Office of
<
Civil Preparedness
Fermi, LPM, NRR
E. G. Greenman, RIII
bec:
PUBLIC
1
i
RdbI
RII
RIII
RIII
n
e
,a
Pirtle/jp
P
li s
greed
Pederson
12/28/93
/> f
S
^
,
~
-
-.
.-