ML20059B276

Notice of Violation from Insp on 931115-23.Violation Noted: on Four Occasions Personnel Have Been W/Unescorted Access Authorization to Protected Area

ML20059B276
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	12/28/1993
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20059B269	List: IR 05000341/1993024 ML20059B268 ML20059B276
References
50-341-93-24, NUDOCS 9401040067
Download: ML20059B276 (1)

Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Detroit Edison Company Docket No. 50-341 Fermi 2 License No. NPF-43 During an NRC inspection conducted between November 15-23, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR 2, Appendix C (1993), the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 26.24(a)(2) requires personnel subject to Part 26 requirements to be immediately and continuously eligible for selection for random testing required by 10 CFR Part 26.

Contrary to this requirement, between October 1992 and August 1993, there have been four occasions when personnel with unescorted access authorization to the protected area and required to be eligible for FFD testing were not in the FFD random selection pool. The periods of ineligibility for FFD selection for random testing generally ranged from one day to five days and involved from one to five persons.

This is a severity Level IV violation (Supplement VII).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, the Detroit Edison Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U. S.

Nuclear regulatory Commission, ATIN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555 with a copy to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois, 60532, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the fermi 2 facility within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. if an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Lisle, Illinois this C day of December 1993 9401040067 931228 PDR ADOCK 05000341 0 PDR