ML20072C590

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:52, 30 May 2023 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Response to Draft Technical Evaluation Rept, Control of Heavy Loads, Item 2.1.8, Crane Design. Util Awaiting Final Documentation of Evaluation,Due to Decrease in Staff.Final Rept to Be Provided by 830401
ML20072C590
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 03/01/1983
From: Stewart W
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To: Clark R, Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
REF-GTECI-A-36, REF-GTECI-SF, RTR-NUREG-0612, RTR-NUREG-612, TASK-A-36, TASK-OR 709B, NUDOCS 8303080484
Download: ML20072C590 (2)


Text

e e VIHOINIA ELucTnIc Axn Powen CoxPAxy RIcnMoxn,VINGINIA 20261 W.L.STEWA,tf Vaca PsamIDaNT NoctaAs Oramarrona

!! arch 1,1983 lir. Harold R. Denton, Director Serial flo. 709B Office of Huclear Reactor Regulation PSE/TLG/jda/0334C Attn: lir. Robert A. Clark, Chief Docket flos. 50-338 Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 50-339 Division of Licensing License Hos. HPF-4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Couaission liPF-7 liashington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:

NUREG-0612 - CONTROL OF HEAVY LOADS NORTil AliNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AllD 2 In ny Decenber 15, 1982 letter to the itRC, (Serial Number 709),

information was provided concerning areas in which Vepco had taken further action as a result of the conclusions and recommendations in the Draft Technical Evaluation Report (TER) for Control of Heavy Loads at North Anna Power Station and, as a result of the October 22, 1982 conference call between Vepco, the NRC and Franklin Research Center personnel. Two areas, TER 2.1.6 Lifting Devices and TER 2.1.8 Crane Design were noted as not couplete and under further evaluation at that time, and that the results would be provided to the NRC by February 1,1983 and llarch 1,1983, respectively.

Response to TER 2.1.6 was provided in uy February 4, 1983 1etter, (Serial Humber 709A).

TER 2.1.8 Crane Design [ Guideline 7, HUREG-0G12, Sec. 5.1.1(7)]

Cocuent Vepco aust verify that the polar cranes meet the fourteen (14) requireaants of CilAA-70 as outlined in the TER.

Response

Final information for TER 2.1.8 Crane Design [ Guideline 7, liUREG-0612, Sec.

5.1.1(7)], was to have been provided by llarch 1, 1983. As noted in the December 15, 1982 letter, Vepco had verified that the polar crane meets 10 of the 14 requirements of CliAA-70, and the remaining four items were under evaluation at that time. The subsequent evaluation has confirmed that the remaining four items all meet the requirements of CilAA-70, but Vepco is i

8303090484 830301 ho U

PDR ADOCK 05000338 p PDR

Vinoinna Et.sermic Ano I%wsm COMPANY TO lir.11. R. Denton 2 awaiting final doculaentation of the evaluation. A report is expected within the next two weeks, which Vepco would like to forward to the liRC as its final response to TER 2.1.8.

The unanticipated delay in the receipt of the necessary information was caused by the fact that the crane vendor reduced his engineering staffing and hours worked during the first part of 1983. Due to this decrease in the crane vendor's support capability, the turnaround time has taken longer than anticipated. A final verification report can be provided to the llRC by April 1,1983, and Yepco requests an extension until that titae.

If you have any questions or require further clarification concerning the above subject, please advise.

Very truly yours, W. l.. Stewart cc: Ilr. James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator Region II 4