ML20214V728

Rev 0 to TVA Employee Concerns Task Group,Other Sites:Leak Rate Testing Group Organization

ML20214V728
Person / Time
Site:	Sequoyah
Issue date:	10/07/1986
From:	Birchell R, Debbage A, Knightly J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
Shared Package
ML20214T770	List: ML20214T769 ML20214T773 ML20214U886 ML20214U902 ML20214U929 ML20214U950 ML20214V344 ML20214V377 ML20214V398 ML20214V421 ML20214V447 ML20214V506 ML20214V523 ML20214V546 ML20214V593 ML20214V615 ML20214V628 ML20214V649 ML20214V673 ML20214V686 ML20214V705 ML20214V728 ML20214V767 ML20214V774 ML20214V800
References
SWEC-SQN-56, SWEC-SQN-56-R, SWEC-SQN-56-R00, NUDOCS 8612090805
Download: ML20214V728 (4)

Text

.

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT EMPLOYEE CONCERNS TASK GROUP OTHER SITES CEG Element

Title:

Leak Rate Testing Group Organization SWEC Concerns: LOO 841231007-001 Source Document: Letter from Richard S. Barkley to J. P. Darling, Dated December 28, 1984 Report Number: SWEC-SQN-56 Evaluator: ( [M!3![h Robert C. Birchell 6 ate Reviewed by: w L44 [ 0[

J. J. Knightly Date E _mte Approved by: _ lo/7/f6 A. G. Debba g Dafe 1263T

, 8612090805 861120 PDR

'~

,j P ADOCK 05000327 PDR

?

Report SWEC-SQN-56 Leak Rate Testing Group Organzation I. Introduction In a personal letter (reference 1) to Mr. J. P. Darling, a Nuclear Regulatory Agency (NRC) trainee (stationed at Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN) from July 9 to December 21, 1984) gave his opinion concerning the reorganization of the TVA Integrated / Local Leak Rate Testing group (ILRT/LLRT). This opinion is addressed in the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC) systematic analysis, as follows:

LOOB 41231007-001, Leak Rate Testing Group Organization.

Inforrstion on the background, corrective actions taken, verification methodology, verification analysis, completion status, and pertinent reference,s for this issue is included in this report.

II. Verification of SWEC Issues A. Background An NRC inspector trainee working at SQN during the period July 9 to December 21, 1984 expressed his opinion of TVA's reorganization of the ILRT/LLRT group in a personal letter to Mr. J. P. Darling, dated I December 28, 1984. The trainee felt that the ILRT/LLRT group should be maintained as a centralized group and not sent to each individual site.

8. Corrective Action Taken Although several individuals were transferred to the different sites to perform local leak rate testing, a central office staff is still maintained to perform the integrated leak rate test and provide support to the sites, when required, for local leak rate testing.

C. Ve.rificatio'n Methodology The SWEC concern identified for ECTG verification was stated as

, follows:

Rims # Issue RIMS #

LOO 941231007 Leak rate testing RIMS-OO1 group organization The Employee Concerns Task Group (ECTG) talked with personnel in the ILRT/LLRT group at SQN and reviewed the latest NRC inspection report (reference 2) on the ILRT/LLRT performance at SQN. This review formed the basis for this verification activity.

Page 1 of 2

e -

P D. Verification Analysis The Employee Concerns Task Group (ECTG) review indicates that the opinion expressed by the NRC trainee does not require any corrective action. The organization of the ILRT/LLRT group provides sufficient technical support and expertise both at the sites and in the central office to perform the required testing.

E. Completion Status Based on the ECTG review, no further action on this item is required. This SWEC concern is closed.

III. References

1. Letter from Richard S. Barkley to J. P. Darling, Dated December 28, 1984

2. NRC Inspection Report Numbers 50-327/85-44 and 50-328/85-44, dated January 14, 1986, David M. Verre111 to H. G. Parris Page 2 of 2

e TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: SWEC-SQN-56 SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT TYPE: Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Element REVISION NUMBER: 0 TITLE: Leak Rate Testing Group Organization REASON FOR REVISION: N/A SWEC

SUMMARY

STATEMENT: The item in this report was identified by a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) trainee and was included in the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC) systematic analysis. The item evaluated within this report was verified to be adequately addressed. The Employee Concerns Task Group considers the item closed.

PREPARATION PREPARED SY:

Wf M/h ' A "

e BW //-l/- ? (,,,

SIGNATURE DATE REVIEWS PEER:

% L GukidSIGNATURB i oints DATE TAS:

OWI '

/ ll $

SIGNATURE DATE CONCURRENCES CEG-H: Ss /fll1ltb SRP:ht'rNd, kf) _ //-/ %

SIGNATURE DATE DATE jf SIGNATUR

[

APPROVED B ECSP MANAGER DATE h N/A MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER DATE CONCURRENCE (FINAL REPORT ONLY)

• SRP Secretary's signature denotes SRP concurrences are in files.

2242T

__ . _ - _ ,