ML20214U950

Rev 0 to TVA Employee Concerns Special Program:Battery Support Design

ML20214U950
Person / Time
Site:	Sequoyah
Issue date:	11/12/1986
From:	Mcnutt G, Russell J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
Shared Package
ML20214T770	List: ML20214T769 ML20214T773 ML20214U886 ML20214U902 ML20214U929 ML20214U950 ML20214V344 ML20214V377 ML20214V398 ML20214V421 ML20214V447 ML20214V506 ML20214V523 ML20214V546 ML20214V593 ML20214V615 ML20214V628 ML20214V649 ML20214V673 ML20214V686 ML20214V705 ML20214V728 ML20214V767 ML20214V774 ML20214V800
References
225.0, 225.0-R, 225.0-R00, NUDOCS 8612090466
Download: ML20214U950 (3)

Text

'

o

, j TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 225.0 SPECIAL PROGRAM 1

REPORT TYPE: Rational for Non-Inclusion REVISION NUMBER: 0  !

(P' as Restart Item j TITLE: Battery Support DesiEn PAGE 1 0F 3 REASON FOR REVISION:

I PREPARATION PREPARED BY:

J. W. Benkert (see sheet 2 for signature) '9-11-86 SIGNATURE DATE h C. W. Jordan (see sheet 2 for signature) 9-11-86 REVIEWS PEER:

I SIGNATURE DATE

$$ $ / $$ '

SIGNATURE DATE CONCURRENCE 3 i-x SN 12 C-M

@@@ CEG-H G. . McNutt SRP: w //~/2-85 mo SIGNATURE DATE [/ SIGNATURE

• DATF

.o r L/

o APPROVED BY:

lb '

lf'lh$$0 N/A 3m ECSP MANAGEF DATE MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER DATE

@@g CONCURRENCE (FINAL REPORT ONLY)

• SRP Secretary's signature denotes SRP concurrences are in files.

2085T

<[' SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT ENGINEERING RELATED EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM RATIONALE FOR NON-INCLUSION AS RESTART ITEM SUBCATEGORY / ELEMENT 225.0 (b)

Battery Support Design The battery supports were included in the SQRT audit conducted by the NRC for both SQN and WBN as indicated by NRC letter to TVA from S. A. Varga to G.

Williams, Jr. dated November 16,1976 [ DES 761122 022] for SQN and NRC letter to TVA from Novak to Parris dated September 23,1982 [821004 E0156] and April 25,1984 [840509 T0052] for WBN. This audit has been satisfactorily closed by both TVA and the NRC. The design and procurement cycles for SQN and WBN occurred in similar time frames such that the resultant hardware is very similar and some cases identical. Bechtel review of WBN is completed as indicated in element review sheets dated April 29, 1986 for Element 225.0 transmitted to TVA via BTT-017 dated 05/02/86 with the conclusion that the batteries are acceptably supported. The battery supports at WBN are qualified to a seismic response spectra that is significantly greater than that required at SQN. Based on the above, Bechtel concludes that these are not SQN restart issues.

ATTACHENT: List of Issues for Civil ELEE NT NO. 225.0 (b)

Date: 09/08/86 Evaluator W 4 41b Date  %\w\h Resp. Mgr.

0-. cAs4c ECEG-H A/AC 8/

Date 7- 2 ' -II 0976d O

SQN RESTART 81 0 ELEENT NUWR 225.0 ' A .

,..D-g es 8ATTERY SUPPORT DESIGN O} .. ;p 4

ELEENT **.

WHERE RESPON.

CONCERN NUMBER (S) ISSUES ADDRESSED SIR.E GENERAL APPROACH /ETH000 LOGY FOR ELEENT REPORT X X 122-017 1. Class IE and Non-Class IE batteries 225.0 YKH NOTE: The battery supports were included in the "Sequoyah - Class lE and non- are unacceptably supported since they SQRT audit conducted by the NRC for both SQel class IE batteries are unaccept- have no tie downs. and WON. This audit has been satisfactorily ably supports (no battery tie closed by t'oth TVA and the NRC. The design and downs), and Unistrut supports 2. Unistrut supports are unacceptably 225.0 YKH procurement cycles for SQN and W occurred in are unacceptably used. CI has used. sintiar time frames such that the resultant no further information, hardware is very similar and some Cases Anonymous concern via letter." identical. Bechtel review of West is completed WI-85-100-006 with the conclusion that the batteries are acceptably supported. The battery supports XX-85-122-018 at wen are qualified to a seismic response XX-85-122-019 spectra that is significantly greater than that

! Thzse are identical to XX-85-122-017 required at SQN. Based on the above, Bechtel concludes that these are not SQN restart issues.

1. Obtain results of SQRT audit by NRC.

2. Review TVA Report I-86-274-SQN

3. Identify and review SQN counterparts to W8N documents used in coupleted WON review.

4. Perform walkdown if required.

0966d-11 (09/08/86)