ML20235E779

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:08, 27 February 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Tech Spec Pages 9,23 & 34 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30 Revised to Accommodate Request to Reduce Frequency of Spurious Scrams Occurring from Sensor While Manipulating Turbine Controls During Startup
ML20235E779
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities, 05000000
Issue date: 04/19/1972
From: Riesland J
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20235B311 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-111 NUDOCS 8709280265
Download: ML20235E779 (1)


Text

l - - ~

lI l . s '. .

UNITED STATES

,L ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

'd,J '

wAsmuovos. o.c. mosas

~>

APR 191972

^

Files (Docket Nos. ~ 50-254 & 50-265)

THRU . Ziemann, Chief, ORB #2, DRL QUAD CITIES TS 1 & 2 - TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE NO. 1 In a letter dated April 7,1972, Commonwealth Edison Company proposed a change in the Technical Specifications of Facility License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 for Quad Cities Units 1 and 2. The proposed change is to lower the set point of the ' turbine electro-hydraulic-control (EHC)- .

system pressure scram from 1100 psig to 900 psig. The lower set' point is requested to reduce the frequency of spurious scrams occurring {

from this sensor while manipulating the turbine controls during startup.

]

1 An identical change was proposed, evaluated and approved for Dresden Units 2 and 3. Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 have comparabic turbines, EHC systems and RPS for equally rated BWRs. The results of the Dresden evaluation as shown in the enclosed letter to Files by G. Lainas, DRL, )

dated October 26, 1971, is equally-applicable to the Quad Cities reactors. l l On this basis and because of the anticipatory nature of this scram, i l we have concluded that the proposed change does not present significant hazards considerations not described or implicit in the Safety Analysis Report and that there is reasonable assurance that the health and saf ety of the public will not be endangered. Consequently, pages 9, 23 and 34 of the Technical Specifications of Licenses DPR-29 and DPR-30 are revised to accommodate this request.

LA- [

. I. % esland'

. Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Reactor Licensing Enclosures Memo to Files dtd 10/26/71 cc w/ enclosure:

DJSkovholt, DRL TJCarter, DRL DLZiemann, DRL JIRiesland, DRL RMDiggo, DRL Compliance (3)

MJinks, DR (2) 8709280265 870921 0 PDR FOIA MENZ87-111 PDR