ML20205C208

Responds to 880831 Ltr Expressing Concerns Re Georgia Tech Research Reactor Resuming Operations.Request Denied Because of Relatively Narrow Well Defined Focus of Issues at Hand

ML20205C208
Person / Time
Site:	Neely Research Reactor
Issue date:	10/07/1988
From:	Ernst M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Goldin B AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
NUDOCS 8810260421
Download: ML20205C208 (2)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ___ ____ ___ __ ________ - _ ____ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ ___ _ __-__ _ ___ _ _-_____

~

/Ms.BetsyGoldin 944 Euclid Avenue, N.E. '

Atlanta, Georgia 30307

Dear Ms. Goldin:

, This is in response to your letter to Dr. J. Nelson Grace, dated August 31,

! 1988, in which you expressed concerns related to the Georgia Tech Research Reactor resuming operations and requested a hearing in this regard. Your l request implies a concern regarding the ability of Georgia Tech to _ operate i <

their reactor safely. The NRC shares your safety interest, and reasonable assurance of safe operation will be obtained by the NRC prior to allowing the

' Georgia Tech Reactor to restart. It is for this very reason that we issued an Order on January 20, 1988, to cease irradiation experiments and a Confirmatory Order on March 17, 1988, to cease reactor operations until all safety questions had been resolved to the NRC's satisfaction and the NRt, 'pproved resumption of operations.

When the NRC issued the Confirmatory Order on March 17, any party adversely affected by that Order was afforded an opportunity within twenty days of the date of the Order to request a public hearing. As no such request was filed within the required time, no hearing is required to be held. More importantly, the safety aspects of operating the reactor were all carefully reviewed at the time of licensing, and none of those considerations have been changed. The thrust of our efforts over the past few months have been to improve certain management and administrative practices that have deteriorated over time, and these issues will be resolved prior to giving our permission for restart.

Thus, because of the relatively narrow, well-defined focus of the issues at hand, a hearing would not be useful from a safety standpoint. For these two reasons, we are denying your request.

We al.reciate your interest and will be pleased to respond to any specific concerns you may have.

Sincerely, Malcolm L. Ernst Acting Regional Administrator cc: sdr.RatibA.Karam, Director j Neely Nuclear Research Center VA. P. Sheppard, Acting Vice  !

President for Research '

State of Georgia i bec: (See page 2) 8810260421 881007 PDR ADOCK 05000160 1 8

H PDC 7

L-

l Ms. Betsy Goldin 2 OCT C 11ssa l

l l bec: Document Control Desk DRS Technical Assistant v'A. Adams , NRR l

1 ,

1 l

1 l

l l

l .

1 i

l l

l l

l l

l 1

1 1

l l I 1

Rll l Ri! ^/ R R1 / HQ Y 4(

Ri!(v -

RGoddard Holahan tele, Dyerrelli 1.Reyes GJenk ns P t Jir

! \ 10/y/88 10/$'/88 10/g"f88 10//,/88 1/p/88 concurrence i - 10/6/88 l