ML20155J583

Responds to Expressing Concerns Re Georgia Tech Research Reactor Resuming Operations.Confirmatory Order Issued on 880120 to Cease Reactor Operations Until All Safety Questions Resolved

ML20155J583
Person / Time
Site:	Neely Research Reactor
Issue date:	10/07/1988
From:	Ernst M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Tribble H AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
NUDOCS 8810260406
Download: ML20155J583 (2)

Text

E PCT 01 W S .

\

/Mr.HoraceTribble 195 Hunnicut Street, N.W., #331 ,

Atlanta, Georgia 30313

Dear Mr. Tribble:

This is in response to your letter to Dr. J. Nelson Grace, dated August 31, 1988, in which you expressed concerns related to the Georgia Tech Research Reactor resuming operations and requested a hearing in this regard. Your request implies a concern regarding the ability of Georgia Tech to operate their reactor safely. The NRC shares your safety interest, and reasonable assurance of safe operation will be obtained by the NRC prior to allowing the Georgia Tech Reactor to restart. It is for this very reason that we issued an Order on January 20, 1988, to cease irradiation experiments and a Confirmatory Order on March 17, 1988, to cease reactor operations until all safety questions i had been resolved to the NRC's satisfaction and the NRC approved resumption of j operations.

When the NRC issued the Confirmatory Order on March 17, any party adversely affected by that Order was afforded an opportunity within twenty days of the 4

date of the Order to request a public hearing. As no such request was filed i within the required time, no hearing is required to be held. More importantly, the safety aspects of operating the reactor were all carefully reviewed at the time of licensing, and none of those considerations have been changed. The

thrust of our efforts over the past few months have been to improve certain management and administrative practices that have deteriorated over time, and 1 these issues will be resolved prior to giving our permission for restart.

]

Thus, because of the relatively narrow, well-defined focus of the issues at hand, a hearing would not be useful from a safety standpoint. For these two reasons, we are denying your request, j We appreciate your interest and will be pleased to respond to any specific j concerns you may have.

Sincerely, f

I Malcolm L. Ernst  !

Acting Regional Administrator i cc: Ldr. Ratib A. Karam, Director J N vd.eelyNuclearResearchCenter P. Sheppard, Acting Vice President for Research State of Georgia bec: (See page 2)

! 8810260406 881007 POR ADOCK 05000160 i

g PDC g p i

M c/

,. OCT o 7 tra Mr. Horace Tribble 2 bec: Document Control Desk RS Technical Assistant

. Adams, NRR i

RI I Ril RI R1 )/ R HQ DVerrelli LReyes GJenk ns RGoddard P t pr Holahan tele.

10/(/88 10/(/88 10/g88 10//, /88 1/p/88 concurrence

. 10/6/88