ML20197H026

Nuclear Operations Improvement Plan

ML20197H026
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	04/30/1986
From:	DETROIT EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20197H018	List: ML20197H013 ML20197H026
References
PROC-860430, NUDOCS 8605190032
Download: ML20197H026 (10)

Text

.- . . _ . . -.. _ _ _ _ - - _ . ._ _ . . _ _ _ . .

h, Enclosure .r ,

4 t

i l

i i

4 i

r t

't i

'I t

1

+

l The Detroit Edison Company l

! Fermi 2 l

) Nuclear Operations Improvement Plan i .

y l-4 4 f[

t i

i i

M i

" i 8605190032 SM)SO9 n APr:1 30, 1986 PDR ADOCK 05000341 l 1 P PDR

. - - - , . - ~ r , , , - - . . . , , , , , , - . - . - -.e--,_--, ,,,e,-.., ._,.e.v.,,, .

,_-,nm m. . - - , , . , . . . . , , , ,.v, , ..,g. - . ,w.- -,,-,g a

I 1

i i

I NUCLEAR CPERATICNS IMPROVDENT PLAN

, INTMDUCTION Se Nuclear Operations Inprovement Plan (NOIP) includes a comprehensive set of specific actions and related performance indicators directed at bringing about significant inprovement in overall performance throughout the Fermi 2 Nuclear Operations organization. We specific actions were developed by the Fermi 2 ,

senior managers, with significant input from most of the Fermi 2 Management Tean )

msnbers. Wis plan has been gproved for inplementation by the Vice President -

Nuclear Operations. l 2e NOIP establishes due dates and assigns specific responsibility to one or more Nuclear Operations groups. Where more than one group is involved, the group with lead responsibility is identified. Each affected manager and supervisor is responsible for identifying and pplying the necessary resources within his or her organization, for maintaining gpropriate interfaces with ,

other affected organizations, and for ensuring that the required actions are I cmplets3 in en effective and timely manner. We NOIP specifically addresses accountability for accmplishing the identified actions by requiring that the actions be included in individual Annual Work Plans. .

1 he NOIP contains ten performance indicators to monitor and measure the effectiveness of the Plan. Rese performance indicators and the specific actions of the Plan will be reviewed at least monthly by Fermi 2 management to ensure that the necessary inprovements are being obtains 3 and to identify areas where further action is necessary.

We NOIP is a plan for inprovement of the Nuclear Operations organization. Its success depends on the individual efforts and contributions of every Nuclear Operations employe involved.

04/30/86 l . _ - _ _ _ _ .

( - -

Phage 1. b .

April 29,c1986 ,

l Permi 2 I Nuclear Operiitions Improvement Plan , ,

i y _

Action Deliverables Reso (1) Due Date -

• j, sl l

1.

Revieg Nuclear Operations Management l Plan reviewed & criterial NO l 6/66 Plan documents (Nuclear Operations l developed l

/l _

Directives, Nuclear Operations Pro- l l l

\ -

grams, Operational Quality Assurance l- Documents reviewed & l NO l 8/86 \'

Policies, Quality Assurance Program l prioritize,d for revision! .I )

Requirements) {and revise assn 9cessary l, and begin high priority l l'

. to eliminate redundancy o'nd clarify l revisions. I 'I '

programmatic direction. . x l l l l Appropriate documents l NO l s 1988 l rev ised l l l l l , .

t i I I -w l l l .

N'

2. Improve administrative controls and work l l l processes to provide.more effective l l l support to the operating authority. l l l '

Examples include: clarification of re- l l l quirements, responsibilities and account-l l l .

abilities; elimination of redundancy; I l l , . -

simplification ofiprocesses, where l l l 7 possible; and, reduction of time to l l l \

process paper and complete tasks. l l l N l xl. I N

a. Revise identified processes or l PM program revisedi 'l *NP l 7/86 i controls l DER process revised l NE l1 ' 7/86 .

l LER preparation process l RA l 9/86 l revised

• l l l PN-21 process revised l l< 11/86 '

l Procedure preparation l l 9/86 l controls and guidelines l l l r ev ised l l 4 l ._

l I l FDP Process ' revised l *NE l 1st Qtr '87

l ,I NP l l l ;NOS l l l l

• , (1) See notes on last page

__-.____ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ __.__ ___ _ ___m_-_ _ --

Pcge 2 April 29, 1986 Permi 2 Nuclear Operations Improvement Plan Action . Deliverablen Reso (1) Due Date (Item 2 cont'd) l l l

b. Review other processes and controls l Review completed & l *NP l 12/86 to identify needed revisions, I priorities established i NE l determine priority and revise. l l NOS l l l I l Process controls revised l NO l 4th Otr '87 I I I I I l l l l

3. Upgrade existing procedures, as part l Revisions completed l

• NOS l 1988 of normal review cycle, based on l l NP l revised procedure preparation guide- l l NE l lines (See Item 2a above) which will l l NQA l address human factors considerations, I l l need for procedure, level of detail, I l l flexibility, and elimination of I l l redundancy and unnecessary detail. l l l l l I l l I I l l

4. Initiate coordinated involvement of l Integrated I *NP l 7/86 &

affected Nuclear Operations organi- l Plans / Schedules l NE l On going zations to develop and maintain 1 maintained l NOS l integrated plans and schedules. l l l l l l .

I I l l l l

5. Assign organizational and individual i Initial Task l *NP l 5/86 responsibility, authority and I Managers / Lead s l NOS l accountability for controlling and I assigned l NE l accomplishing elements of the l I I integrated plans and sched ules . I New assignments l *NP l On-going l as necessary l NOS l 4

l l NE l l l l

• , (1) See notes on last page

Page 3 -

April 29, 1986 -

Fermi 2 Nuclear Operations Improvement Plan Action Deliverables Reno l'11 Due Date i I

6. Upgrade engineering capability to support i l l operation of Fermi 2. l l l l 1 I a) Perform third party review of I l l Nuclear Engineering. procedures l Review Group l NE l 6/86 in support of 10CPR50.54(f) l established and plan l l response. l for review complete. l l l l l l Review complete l NE I 11/86 l l l l Recommendations l NE l 2nd Qtr '87 l evaluated & imple- l l l mented as appropriate l l l l l b) Evaluate adequacy of permanent l Evaluation completed l NE l 9/86 engineering expertise and l I l upgrade as appropriate. l Required rec ruiting l NOS l 12/86 l initiated l l l l l l l l l l l

7. Establish ar.d communicate guidelines l Guidelines l *NE l 7/86 for improved, systematic problem l communicated l NP l solving. l l l '

I I I

I I i l l l

8. Evaluate and upgrade existinQ methods l Evaluation completed l NO l lst Qtr '87 fcr identifying and incorporating I l I

" lessons lea rned" into day-to-day l l l activities. I Upgrade completed l NO l 3rd Qtr '87 I I I I I l

• , (1) See notes on last page

Prge 4 April 29, 1986 Fermi 2 Nuclear Operations Improvement Plan Action Deliverables Reso (1) Due Date i I I

9. Improve knowledge of industry experi- l Policy for l NO l 12/86 ences through increased participation I increased utilization l l in, and utilization of, INPO peer i es tablish ed l l evaluations. l I I I I l l l l l l l

10. Communicate the Nuclear Operations i Methodology developed I *NI l 5/86 Improvement Plan to af fected organi- l l NO I zations and individuals. l I I l Plan communicated l NO l 5/86 I I I I I I I I l l l l

11. Include NOIP action items in l Work Plans revised l NO l 7/86 Annual Work Plans of Nuclear l l l Operations Management Team l Monitor performance i NO l On-going members as part of individual I and provide feedback l l performance appraisal process. I at least quarterly. l l l l l 1 l l i I i

12. Complete Reactor Operations Improve- l I I ment Program i I l '

l I I a) Evaluate and identify program l Selec ted items l NP I 9/86 elements to determine items which I identified l l should be incorporated into existing l i l administrative controls. l l l l l l b) Complete formal program by l Prog ram completed l NP l 12/86 incorporating identified elements l l l into existing procedures. l l l I I I I I I

• , (1) See notes on last page

Page 5 April 29, 1986 ,

Fermi 2 Nuclear Operations Improvement Plan Action Deliverables Reso (1) Due Date l I i

13. Improve Technical Specification l l l interpretations & applications: l l l

\ l I a) Complete current upgrading of l Upgrading completed l NP l 7/86 Interpretation Log I I l & Ongoing l I I b) Identify specific Tech Spec l Needed changes  ! NP l 8/86 changes necessary to reduce I documented i I & Ongoing ambiguity and request appropriate i I I amendments. 1 Initiate amendment i RA l 9/86 1 requests l l & Ongoing i I i 1 l l I l l

14. Develop & implement a scram reduction i Program implemented l NP l 12/86 program utilizing techniques found l l l successful by INPO and other industry l l 1 groups. l l l 1 I I I I I I i i

15. Complete Nuclear Security Improve- l Plan completed l NOS l 12/86 ment Plan l l l 1 I I .

I I I I I i

16. Implement Radiological Control  ! Plan implemented l *NP l 6/86 1 Improvement Plan I l NO l l l l l I I I I l l l l

• , (1) See notes on last page

, 1:

! Ptge 6 April 29, 1986 .

}

Fermi 2 Nuclear Operations Improvement Plan -i Action Deliverables Reso (1) Due Date I i i

17. Improve QA awarenesa by identifying l Training approach l *NQA l 9/86 key elements of program and develop- I determined l NOS I ing a training approach which l l I emphasizes those aspects of program l Training material l *NQA l 12/86 that apply to various levels and I developed l NOS I types of workers / supervisors / managers. I I I l Training implemented l NOS l 1st Qtr '87 '

I l l i l I I I I I

18. Improve methods to increase & main- l Methodologies l *RA l 6/86

! tain awareness of industry, regula- l identified i NO l tory and public concerns I l l l Implementation plans I *RA l 8/86 i i developed & approved l NI l 1 1 I I l l I I i

19. Recruit and select qualified in-. 1 Positions identified i NO I 8/86 dividuals for the Nuclear Operations I& prioritized l I permanent work force to reduce con- I l I tractor dependency in positions of I Recruiting initiated l NOS I 8/86 organizational leadership. l I l l l I .

I I I I l l

20. Meet Corporate commitments-regarding i SER's submitted l NOS I 6/86

.; INPO accreditation of training pro- l 1 I grams. l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i * , (1) Set "0tes on last page .

)

Pcge 7 April 29, 1986 -

Fermi 2 Nuclear Operationn Improvement Plan Action Deliverables Reso (1) Due Date i I l

21. Improve management information l Systems needing im- l NOS l 12/86 systems by consolidating existing l provement identified l l systems to eliminate redundancy l (user organization) l l and delete outmoded systems l 1 l or unnecessary data. l Implementation plan l NOS l 2nd Qtr '87 1 developed and approved l i l i i i l l I l 1

22. Maintain industrial safety record l Formal safety l NO l On-going by continued emphasis on personal I program implemented l l safety and the analysis of near l l l injury events. l l l l l l Notes:

Resp (1) is the responsible organization as follows:

• NO = Nuclear Operations NP = Nuclear Production NE = Nuclear Engineering ,

RA = Regulatory Affairs NI = Nuclear Information NOS = Nuclear Operations Services NQA = Nuclear Quality Assurance Nuclear Quality Assurance will be involved in essentially all actions of the Nuclear Operations Improvement Plan (NOIP) as a normal part of their function.

• Indicates Lead Organization

Nuclear Operations Inprovement Plan Performance Measures Fermi 2 Management will review the following ten performance meacures at least :conthly to assess progress and to identify further actions which may be required to improve operating performance. The NIC has indicata3 that they will monitor and evaluate our progress in inplementing the plan on a monthly basis.

1. Collective Radiation Exposure: total amount of whole body radiation exposure received by all personnel at Fermi 2.

2. Urplanned Radiological Relamaam: number of liquid or gaseous releases to the environment which were either unplanned or urunonitored.

3. Urplanned Safety Systemi Actuations: the ntanber of unplanned 1 ECCS actuations and emergency AC power system actuations.  ;

4. Chemmistry out of Specification: ntrnber of hours that reactor coolant, feedwater and condensate chemistry was out of specification.

5. Volume of Low Level Solid Radioactive Waste: ntsnber of cubic feet of low level solid radioactive waste shipped for disposal.

6. Startup Test Phase Schedule: measure of actual startup test performance milestones ccanpared to scheduled startup test milestones. i

7. Tbtal Nancogdiances: ntunber and severity level of NIC notices of violation.

8. Reportable Occurrences (LER's): ntanber of written Licencee Event Reports submitted.  :

9. Time Sensitive ICD's: ntanber of unplanna3 time sensitive Limiting conditions of Operations.

10. Oh Findl.nge Delinquent: number of delinquent NQA audit and surveillance findings.

April 30, 1986 3

j