ML20126B554
| ML20126B554 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1985 |
| From: | Bennett W, Breslau B, Chamberlain D, Dubois D, Farrell R, Craig Harbuck, Holley W, Jaudon J, Murphy M, Powers D, Will Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126B536 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-458-85-35, NUDOCS 8506140135 | |
| Download: ML20126B554 (500) | |
See also: IR 05000429/2005003
Text
r3 ,
y- <
,
"
1
,
-i < . , -;
,
l
.. , .4
x
.>
t
< ' ,
, ,
,
'
'
- .
, APPENDIX ,
>
e U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COPfilSSION I
, REGION IV ;,
.
~
NRC Inspection Report: 50-458/85-35 Construction Permit: CPPR-145
- . Docket
- 50-458
Licensee: Gulf States' Utilities (GSU)
P. O. Box 2951
Beaumont, Texas -77704
.
Facility Name: River Bend Station
Inspection At: River Bend Site, St. Francisville, Louisiana
Inspection Conducted: April 29 - May 3, 1985
,
Inspecto : Ajj ~
M /) 8.56
W. /R. f(enngtt, . Reactor Insp"ector, Project Dat6
Section B, Reactor Project Branch 1 (RPB1)
w l.lb/ 85'
~B.'Ab Breslau, Reactor Inspector, Project D(te~
. Section B, RPB1
~
,
L - A
~
D. D. Chamberlain,' Senior Resident Inspector
//TT
Dhte'
River Bend Nuclear Generating Station
.
WhfSE
D. L. DuBois, Senior Resident Inspector Dite'
, Cooper' Nuclear Station
'
&
'
< 'E
R. E. Farr411, Senior Resident Inspector
bb
Date '
V
River Bend Nuclear Generating Station
8506140135 850611
PDR ADOCK 05000458
G PDR
E
..
.. .
r.,
i
2-
i. ,
/J t/ 4%A df3 /T
l' Date
C[
L Pro;tetLSection A, RPB1C. Hart)dck, Reactor Inspector, _
'
, ,
e .
.
W.
! L ) kW -
L.' Holley, Radi~ation Spscialist, Facilities
bkh
Date. .
Radiological Protection Section
, - ,
'd S ff
M. E. Murphy / Read.orMnspector, Special Dste'
._
Projects and Engineering Section (SPES), RPB1'
& $fSl$$
D. A. Powers, Technical Reviewer, SPES, RPB1 Date
Oh J'
i W. F. Smith, Resident Inspector, Comanche Peak Date
Steam Electric Station
Accompanying Personnel: W. C. Banister, Consultant
K. A. Ward, Consultant
Approved: '
M
ag e. (audon nief, Project Section A, RPB1 Date
...
- - . -
.- -- - -
_ ,, __, ,
... ,
-
>
. ,
?:, , _
- , ..
'
-3- .
,
,
ri..
r
(.}41 ' hfbf$
B. Murray, Chief, Fysilities Radiological Ddte'
Protection SectioV
,
Inspection Summary
-Inspection Conducted April 29 - May 3, 1985 (Report 50-458/85-35)
Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection of Technical Specifications and
implementing procedures. The inspection involved 542 inspector-hours onsite by
ten'NRC inspectors and two NRC consultants.
Results: Within the one area inspected, no violations or deviations were
identified.
~
- ,
..
e
i
h
g
a
Y
y
+
~ +
,
4 .
-
-
.
6
-4-
DETAILS
1. Persons Contacted
Gulf States Utilities (GSU)
- J. E. Booker, Manager, Engineering, Fuels, and Licensing
- W. J. Cahill, Jr., Senior Vice President
- D. R. Gipson, Assistant Plant Manager, Operations, Chemistry, Radwaste
- G. R. Kimmell, Supervisor, Operations Quality Assurance (QA)
- G. V. King, Plant Services Supervisor
R. J. Kosmala, Senior Control System Engineer
- T. W. Overlid, Process Systems Supervisor
T. F. Plunkett, Plant Manager
- J. Price, Nuclear Licensing
- H. F. Roark, Electrical Maintenance Supervisor
- D. G. Seymour, Compliance Analyst
A. E. Speeg, Instrument and Controls (I&C) Foreman
- J. E. Spivey, QA Engineer
- R. B. Stafford, Director, Quality Services
- L. R. Thompson, I&C Supervisor
- P. F. Tomlinson, Director, Operations QA
- D. Williamson, Reactor Engineering Supervisor
Nuclear Engineering Services (hES)
- J. M. Albert, Assistant Project Manager
R. Boyd, I&C Supervisor
P. Different, Operations Supervisor
G. Grant, Field Engineer
- J. B. Warner, Project Manager
The NRC inspectors also contacted other licensee personnel including
administrative, clerical, maintenance, operations, and technical
personnel.
- Indicates attendance at exit interview on May 3, 1985.
2. Technical Specifications and Implementing Procedures
The purpose of this inspection was to determine the adequacy of the draft
Technical Specifications (TS) and to assess the licensee's readiness to
implement the TS.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the draft TS. This review served to:
o Provide understanding of the draft TS
e Establish general agreement between the draft TS and the FSAR
_
_____________
i
.
.
-5-
Although this inspection was not specified as an "as-built" verification,
the NRC inspectors did not find any major differences between the draft TS
and the FSAR.
The licensee provided a cross reference between the draft TS and licensee
procedures. The inspection consisted of a review of all available
procedures and a walkdown of selected procedures. The licensee had
identified 889 procedures to support TS surveillance. Of this total,
approximately 80 procedures had either not been written %r had not been
approved for initial validation by the licensee. Procenures which are
revision "0" arc approved for validation purposes only and are not
considered ready for use. Revision "1" (or a higher revision number)
procedures are approved for use. At the time of this inspection, only
16 procedures were issued as revision "1". It was noted that many
revision "0" procedures had been walked down, but the process of
incorporating changes and resolving comments had not yet resulted in the
issuance of revision "1" versions of the procedures.
The specific inspection results are documented on data sheets. These data
sheets are included as an attachment to this report. There were
422 problems documented which will require either correction or completion
of procedures, including 30 instances of typographical errors
or questions in the draft TS. These 30 were forwarded to the Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation by separate correspondence.
A general analysis of the problems found led to the following conclusions:
e The licensee walk down of procedures had not uncovered many apparent
problems,
o Procedures which perform the same nominal test on similar channels
appear to be formatted differently and have dissimilar prerequisites
and precautions.
e The licensee's surveillance procedures were not yet in a state of
readiness such that they would support licensing.
The open items on the attached data sheets are numbered 001 through 422.
For record purposes, each of these should be considered as being preceded
by "50-458/8535 ." All items will be required to be closed prior to fuel
load unless otherwise specified.
No violations or deviations were identified as a result of this
inspection.
l
3. Exit Interview
An exit interview was conducted on May 3, 1985, with those personnel
denoted in paragraph 1. The NRC senior resident inspectors for operations
and con 3truction both attended this meeting. The NRC inspectors summarized j
the purpose, scope, and findings of the inspection at this meeting. l
l
l
-
.
-
-
'
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PAR': A M. /. / PAGE NO.: 3/V /-/
TS REQUIREMENT: .hETERin trfE 3 AvTZUuMI M A R6 td A.) PR io R To 5 71\ e rv P,
R) warHsJ S o n m ed.b / 7 F' R s 0 R. TO 2%Poso ef coRRc5 Po Albin/C; To
TH & u m sT. AAIb C.') wsrnIW t 2- ta ils . A FTER. >ETEcTiWG stock Ro h.
'
2//r/Ff REV.: C
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:sre- oso-3&o/ ISSUE DATE:
TITLE: SH 0 Tlou) A/ /M4RG/W bolo AtSTRA 7/0 Af
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? NoT VER)FsEh
Is installed system consistent with TS? X
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial)?
Artc.9R To . X,
Does procedurgarry out TS requirement? ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should X
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? Y
REMARKS: /N 4. 2 " xEAlo A/- FRCE * A/EEb5 S PCc i f ic. i T V[ '
If . S o /nd A/ J'
/]A LF u t/E s FRom PFA KT [A/oTE TH i S Proc r-duR c i+4 s
C YC L E - SPEC t %~ t C ' BAT A hl b h)i LL AlWD T~0 8E
7'~RA t l< Eb VI A Wbn1 P R 0 c E'b d R. A L. RE@d t RCMEWTs.
Such IS AloT APPARG'Nr PROM KEJ/EU)) A/C, STP- o SO .340 / )
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
!
(
(lWE APPLlC0dT iMKsT Abb "L A TER's " 7D T // E IkocEhtJ2E .
00I mso01 xc^1oa - Peec " s ee c , F sc u r Y I .S NEEb 63. THEs&~
00a.
REVis uo a) s hee WEEh Eb P2to 2 ro o l. /.sr0Adcs.
INSPECTOR (S): 3ALh' A. )ou)EA'S '
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? '
$
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S): I
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5-35 PAGE NO.: A -/
i
k
'
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: kl E PAGE NO.: 3/Y / *
TS REQUIREMENT: UERt FV Di FFEREdcf SETLdEEd Mc7uM 4 A Af /3
PRWDtCTED Rob D Eds t TT S I % AK/k A.3 b d R or16 SThRT U P AFTEit
cms- ALrtRAr>oAls a^!b Bd edegV a s sr F P b .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: sre-oso-37aoISSUE DATE: z// 9/ss-
'
REV.: o
TITLE: RE ACTWI TY Adom n U ES
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? NoT VEAIFIEb
Is installed system consistent with TS? NOT V E R)Pid
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial)? a
APratt ~ro 'e X
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should NOT VERI FiEb
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? X
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
Vf~r}[ t
A P P L ICA NT~ MdM' Abb "L A TCR 'S " TO THS RoCEbd2Ei
003 Cn)CC TMRY #26 A MIL.4BLE Anib PRIOR TO ISSJi1&c 6_
DP THG OL.
INSPECTOR (S): "h A L.E A. 'Pou)G# $
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected? .
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8 5- 35 PAGE NO.: 4 -a
^
, - -
_
,
6
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M./.3.l.Y.A./ PAGE NO.: J// /-f
VE Ri Fv' TH+T TNr scram lisef/4 gs g
TS REQUIREMENT:
YOLUM E b RAI Al kol D t/EAf r VALt/E5" CLOSE 4)rTHW 3C
SEcoAlb5 AFTER scram s t&A/n t 2 cc. cl PT
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: sTP-osz-ow/ ISSUE DATE: /t/4/sp' REV.: O
TITLE: ScRnm %sscHARG E VOLUME \fklVE QPERk81UTY ~ REST
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? A/07 VEA/Fisrb
Is installed system consistent with TS? No r vrRs F/r3
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or y
editorial)?
APft'AR To X
Does proceduregarry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should )(
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? X
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? '
/Jou)Gl/EL 7/fr MPu ckAlr's PRoceik)2ES PRfcL d hE OJ er
oV A REL/ . O PROCEhtlAE-
INSPECTOR (S): dBIE M. 20MER S
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
5
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-35 PAGE NO.: h-3
,
L- .
r
'
'
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M /.3./.4/.A.2. PAGE NO.: J/$' / - 5-
TS REQUIREMENT: UERo rY TMkT~ *THe' S cR An1 hoscMARGE vo t dM E"
bR A s ta As]b VCU T vat JES O PEF) CdHEd THE SckAw1
Sidsfel- ts R E5E~T
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STP-052-0601 ISSUE DATE: iz/6/## REV.: O
TITLE: scRAwt hSCHARGC VO L UME VALi/E~ OPEnksit ITY TEST
YES NO '
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ND T VEAIF/ED
Is installed system consistent with TS? A/o 7- VeWiFie-3
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial)g
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? I
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should ( '
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? E
REMARKS:
.
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR 0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
McWevcL rHr APPLlen^hk ProcE-bveer P2cctu W uss
or & ktv. n Peocebun e.
INSPECTOR (S): 34LE A, )o(A/ERS
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS-35 PAGE NO.: A 'l
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'
TS PARA: M. /. .T. / . M . 8 PAGE NO.: 3// /-d'
TS REQUIREMENT: CodhJe Y c//4MMEL FJA!C h o U n L TETT o f SCAk M
.hlscHARGE VowMr scAnnt Asth co W T R_0 L Rob blocX L tn/Cl--
I d s TR O nt E U TA TIo Al
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STP-so0-coz ISSUE DATE: ////z/## REY.: O
TITLE: RSP- scRant hrscH ARGr volver W4 rrat tevet -His '
y
c H A NA'EL. CALtBRkTf DM yES ng
(cts-Alpt2A * ct -Ndo/A)
Is there any differehce )between FSAR/SER and TS? 4/p r yr Ri F/r h
-
Is installed system consistent with TS? Nor t/c4far)
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editoriali?
specng ro u
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? A
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that,it should NOT VERIFish
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? X
. REMARKS: THE i'20cEh)RE IS A Co M Binl&TIo rJ 0F % Proc _fh/2S.S
Arlb is coalFas/ Alt;. 14A] /IM PRou EDtCAI 7~ id60L b 66 70
SEft+RATC 66 ntAKE a scfkeATE FVoct>02ES . ALSo, THE PRocebuRC .
'
CddfdsfS #ChNNCL Fo Me n oAfA L TE5T * td/T}l " CNM WWEL C h LitSR RT/o d."
tnt ~ FRii20EA/c.Y Inl rt/E PaocrN2e shkrab E E 3) b Ass Ator 19 Moor /& '
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
/
001 7//E~ APfLIcAUT s1vsT0))9hh "lkTEll's " To THE Procedure.0FCLise
003 FEEQ)EkicV; AtJh Sc PAR A-TC PRWCbUMS QM L&TTE5L issus-
IS A Rttentt> TEA)hh~rlb A). ) ALL P2t oR To oL /SfuA dc E.
INSPECTOR (S): 2W4E 4. molders
'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO,
Were problems corrected?
.
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS -3 5 PAGE NO.: A-9
_ _ _ -. __
.. -_ - -_ - _. - _ _ - . - _ _ _ . - - . _ _ _ _ _ -
'
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M/3./.8/.6 PAGE NO.: 3/7' / -f
TS REQUIREMENT: conhve r eHANWCL FONc:n oM A L TEST * OF ScgAm
huseM Rsi Vot JMC Sc.RMM A-db to W TR OL. Rob 6 4.o LK LEVEL
Id5TRJ n1CM TA Trohl
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:sTr-seo-vSoy ISSUE DATE: 2/z 3/#S' REV.: o
TITLE: R PS - s e sta m b sse MARS C votuac s/A racR t.EVEL~ HI6H
-
C & AWWG~L. FJNCTIOMML TEST yg
( c.Il iv0/Jb )
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Nor vrRepich
-
Is installed system consistent with TS? /Vo T t/ r R t FI E D
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
'editoria1 ?
Does proced}ure carry out TS requirement? X
,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M VERtFIEb
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? K
REMARKS: TM PRocEbdRE W sTiVTcb 19 PPLI CARI L I TY Ad h
Fero o rd e v 'hg Ho T coneEseesi'b 'ro T'E c M .
59Ec. 4. t . 3. I . 4. R .
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
()op THE MPLicAAI T rndsTObh "L&rc a 's " to ~hececb d f A L S C,
N EED To hc
007 h ffLtth %sL.lT Y kNb FRE QJerAlc s 65 l
'
RGUt S Eb. MLL '? RI O K *r0 0L /35 U NA/C S.
INSPECTOR (S): M4E' 4 PdWE45
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS -35 PAGE NO.: A -/,
,
" '
'
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M./.J.R..B PAGE NO.: 3/Y / --8
TS REQUIREMENT: PERPOKM 22 S c R h nt TEs,T Fouca/ ids
fM4rA/TdWAAlcf 0A H!d)/s c~ M A ~rt 0 MS 7~hinr CDU U APFECT
/ AlsfR.Tto Al TIM f"
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:srP-osz-3701 ISSUE DATE: z/v/pr REY.: O
TITLE: cow rA'ot Rob scRA AA Tts TIWS
'
YES y
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? NOT ve,ef r reb
Is installed system consistent with TS? Nor 4/c arrier e: A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorialg
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? X
oDoes the procedure walkdown indicate that it should Nor vrR/F/e3
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? X
REMARKS: T//C fRoce bdRE RCF EREn:cES (/H TEXT N o 'r' t M
REFEAcalcc Se~cTrom ) PRO C602E S TP ~ 0.s'2 - 0 70 0 AsAW
Ac' rte d REGJt ta chteWT. THG" MPPu cA dT's PRocchuRC
l Is T/NG . hots NO T I b rN~YI(= y A P R o s e-D GP.6 0 (:
TH s du m acR. .
STATUS OF ITEM M CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
Tile APPLICA alt MUS T /"A .Q tl e D tf TH E~ A!Gb E~b
00E P'R.o cEbu g, g ST P ~ oSa. - c yon 7'Rio ic To OL / SS ds4 Alc C,
INSPECTOR (S): 7)AE 4 7dcv6RS
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
_N,_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? 6
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS: ,
l
'
INSPECTOR (5):
l INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-35 PAGE NO.: 47
. . - _ _ . . . _-. . _ _ - _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
,
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M/.3.NA PAGE NO.: 3// /~/2-
TS REQUIREMENT: l/ER i F V c, R' Coo PL/r/G To e E.b w1
APTWA CORE ALTE RA T/o Als
LIC PROCEDURE NO.: GoP- ? ISSUE DATE: A/A REV.: A/A
TITLE: NA '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? go r prA'/p/ed
.Is installed system consistent with TS? 4/0T 4 /eR/F/ ara
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or ><
editorial
Does proce ure carry out TS requirement? X
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should NA
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? A/4
REMARKS: NO PROetht)26 A(IA-/LA 6 LE.
!
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
THC A PPLI C A A) Y A1Js r MVclo ? TNE PROcYbt/W
001 PRn D R TD 0L 15SU 4 Ain E.
INSPECTOR (S): 2)A(.E 4 20M/545
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? -
Were any other ptoblems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ f 5 -35 PAGE NO.: 4P
'
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M. l.3 . 4. 8, PAGE NO.: J///-/ 2
TS REQUIREMENT: l/ERIFV CR Cdu PL/d4 To eRhd
Anlyrita E Thi~ C R. t.S (4 i T"64 ) RA sal Al TO S J L L.
00 T Po1 i rio Al
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 60 P- ? ISSUE DATE: A/A REV.: A/A
TITLE: A/4
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? No r VCRI FIE'd
Is installed system consistent with TS? NOT- t/ r Ri Fl E b
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or Y_
editoria}l Y
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Doestheprocehurewalkdownindicatethat.itshould A/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? A/4
REMARKS: NO PEoc.Eh/ P_E AV A i LA R LE .
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
THE A f ?LIc 4-rJ T n1 UST~ hEl/ELO P THE PA DcCb UEE"
O'O PRIbe To nL iss t) A hJ CS .
INSPECTOR (S): 3 ALE A- 20 (4)FRS
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
_Y E S_ M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
thSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS-s5 PAGE NO.: 4-7
,
.- __- , - ..
- - _. _. .. _
.- -
'
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M I* 3 Y b PAGE N0.: Mp /-/2-
TS REQUIREMENT: tNRIFV cR co urt./r/g To C /t D /*f
FC L.LouJ t al6 RETE V A J T n1 A t AITEMA ric E
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: GOP ? ISSUE DATE: N/7 REV.: /V4
TITLE: MA
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Nd T PERIF/ ECD
Is installed system consistent with TS? NoT VERiFIEh
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editoriag?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procehure walkdown indicate that it should 4A
/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? MA
REMARKS: No PRocEk)R E AVArt Aet E.
.
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
THE APPLIc AAJ Y Mik r k Vl~Zo? Tate heCehtJRC
Oil prior 70 ol /STUA/L/CE.
INSPECTOR (S): bnLE A. Pe tdER.S
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
i
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff -3 f PAGE NO.: A-to
)
~
~
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y. / 3 I PAGE NO.: 3/f '-'I
TS REQUIREMENT: (cra FV cAv Ho tAS /vd So PP O RT / A> Pther PReoR
To .sTA R T ur A FTER. ANY ne4A/7"EAfAAFCE /Al 7' H C kR EA .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: sTP-oSz 7708 ISSUE DATE: 2/e s-/85 REV.: O
TITLE: Cod TRo L. Rob b Rn/E HoUsiAG stiPPbR7~ CHtEC.K.
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 NoT VEAI FIEb
Is installed system consistent with TS? NOT VEAI FIE)
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial)?
Doesproceiu [arNoutTSrequirement? )( '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should NOT' &RIFIEh
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: 77/E~ PRocEbORG AlEc-bs To BE M0RE
bE5C R 1 P T IVG~. FOR ntisTAAlc E . ld/+&T boC5 PR 0 PE~R,LY
/AlsTA L L b~b hl/TA dn LnpSE OM MiSS/A)G rn nt ha nl -
EkJTs" McAd ? UNEM~ CAM GWE' 'oBTA1A] Guthnales-
prior To enmm enicider 7h- PRocebt./N s steps.
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
THE A PPLI eA H T* h/l4S 7' &Db GPtit/ Ft C. I TV Pf Iok TO
/SSUA AICC OF OL
INSPECTOR (S):
3 ALE ~ B, MCA/6~8.5
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES j@
Were problems corrected? .
Were any other problems identified? *
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S): _
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ h f-35 PAGE NO.: 4-l/
~
_ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4. /. 4 2. A. / PAGE NO.: 3/# /~/O
TS REQUIREMENT: DDvf on/STRA TE Rob /*J A I S IT bdRING
sTwRT u f'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: GOP-? ISSUE DATE: NM REV.: N4
TITLE: NA '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? NOT VeTIFich
Is installed system consistent with TS? No r VfRI F#E3
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial ?
Does proce ure carry out TS requirement? X
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should NA
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? NA
REHARKS: NO PRDcEbdF!E arm /LA 8 LC
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7
CLOSED
YAE APPLt CktJT MUST bel /ELO P THE PJ20cchd R6
- I .fRuoR To OL /S$d A A/Cf .
3 ALE 4
'
INSPECTOR (S): 7didERS
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES Q
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
I
INSPECTOR (S):
i, thSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pi -35 PAGE NO.: 4-I A
l
l
f
_ ___. -
. . - _ _ _ _ , _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . __
l
' '
l
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y /. Y.2. . A 1 PAGE NO.: 3/# /-/8
TS REQUIREMENT: 1EW D,J sTRATr rob I A/ H / S i T mo b C b utt,g4
Pou/ rR. R r ) v c r e o 4)
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: GOP-oool ISSUE DATE: t o/z z/84 REV.: 6
TITLE: PLA & T STARTUP TO L ou) PoulER A LAR.M PC/AJT (35 % )
YES 0
N_0,
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? AloT VERIFIED
Is installed system consistent with TS? NoT VERI FIEEb
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editoria1{?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? k '
Doestheprocehurewalkdownindicatethatitshould NOT VER)FIE)
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
REMARKS: TALE Prot s*htJ EE JS APPLtcMRLE TO P6 GJE~&
AsceniCtn od AIO T PotAIER kth0c.TsoW As S PEC t P t E~h
B(/ 7WF 7EcH. sPet. .
.
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
h CLOSED
" ggy TM APPLtd Attl T OtisT ' A-hb "/ 't TEE 's * V6 SF
CIS Proc a thes . M0;&NE PRec. fat /Rer MusT BEphrit ff
RetavA AST. A U- REvtsteds NEEbED Prick To OL 15504 alct ,
INSPECTOR (S): h4LC A. Y o u/c /t 5'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pi-1S PAGE NO.: 4-I J
0
. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._
. __ - -. ._ , ._ __. - _ _ . _ _ _ _
- . _ . _
. .,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M/ Y2 8* A PAGE NO.: J// /-/8
TS REQUIREMENT: VERir'9 Rob WiTHb g' Au/A L L /m / T ER
Ft> Alc T't o rl O PERA R L E
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 60P- ? ISSUE DATE: NA REV.: A/A
TITLE: /VA '
YES NO.
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? go 7- Vr Rir=,Cb
Is installed system consistent with TS? A/o T vERIFtE.b
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 7
editorial)
Does proceduregarry out TS requirement? X *
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should A/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? A/4
REMARKS: AfD PRO c Eh 0 KE A t/A IL A B LE.
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
g THF APPLI CA A/7~ AldST hEllELOP 77/C Proc e-b bKC
T210R TO OL /SSUAA/cE .
INSPECTOR (S): Dol E S. 7o als /2.T
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other' problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
thSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-JS PAGE NO.: A - 14
)
'
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: //. 2. / PAGE NO.: 3N 2-l
TS REQUIREMENT: t/ERIf Y A PLN(= E S A#f W/TH/A/ t/41/rf AT
TME $9tc.t r teth T/Mrs.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STP-050-Joo/ ISSUE DATE: 34s/ef REV.: o
TITLE: 'f%)Et >Isrti alrian/' u mirs L/tetrienrtoA/
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? A/or s/rt/p/g>
Is installed system consistent with TS? A/pt- vEr ffma
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or i
editorial)?
netc4R To X
Does proceduregarry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should 4/o7 ve#/F/ Erb
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? X'
REMARKS: DN PAG,G 3/4 3 - 2. - 7//E File *L. A/untB e~R
SHouch sc 'P 9 s I E 0 ~1 I 'NOT P8S(609+. THE
A PPLle k alt MS PR00thth 3 mn PLH6k cu RJg S PR i o t.
to AntalltW6; 'rH6 V.s A R bJHic M I h es1To Fte] 3
F0EL ~7VPES _
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
FOR "0 PENS", hRRect 7ME TYPO GR A-P 4t t h L ER R AA/.h
OIR @RGvtaM/ TMC MMPLM2 coRdE.S. THE LICEntsE6 htt/.370MEQUEST ~
OFj AAI AmtA '%rcr/T To TH E Rs AR , ALL OF0KYS klE PRiol2. % 0 L.
INSPECTOR (S): 34Lr 4 Powr#_S j
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
VfS NO
Were problems corrected? t
' Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS Of ITEM
REMARKS:
>
INSPECTOR (S):
lhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-35 PAGE NO.: 4 -l (
l
l l
. - _ _ . . _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ .
_ . _ - - _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ - . _ - .__-..-.- -
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M 2. R PAGE NO.: J/g 2 - 7
TS REQUIREMENT: t/E RI F V A PRist SET PotWrs 4 T' THE
EfterPteb TIM ES.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: str-aso-3ooIISSUE DATE: 3/z//85~ REV.: O
TITLE: Poujc(L b/STRIStJT10Al L/M/T5 V6'At VpckTlo W
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #s 7- VEEt F/cb
Is installed system consistent with TS? A/or VE*/F/Eb
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or .x
editorialp
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? X '
Does the procedbre walkdown indicate that it should 4/or s/Eclesh
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? M
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
//o JEVck, r//r APPL /C4 WTh NROcrh JRtrS REtQ$1iR6
& WAL kbou)N PRtoR To PRocc%elRE us C. 4 ^/ D
DS E~ or REN. O IMOC Eb MG.S /s im/rtretcAnt.C.
INSPECTOR (S): 34t.r A. Pou/gRS
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO,: A -/t
thSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95 - 35
,
,
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4.l 2. 3 PAGE NO.: 3/'/ .2 - S
TS REQUIREMENT: t/c/C a tW MCPR L uff s TS R Y' TW SPEctftED
T/nfES
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 577-o56-3001 ISSUE DATE: 3/z//8f REV.: o
TITLE: Po ci> e n h i s r e r e <> r t o d Listir s
feauficArion/
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 No7- verfereo
Is installed system consistent with TS? sysr vserrieb
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or K
editorial ?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? X '
Does the proced0re walkdown indicate that it should A/or ves/F/Eb
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? X
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
IlopMVr2, T//r AffL t M A/T's ProeechJRtCC Rctputf(h~ A
tr)4LKbou)Al PRio t To Protch dKE U.5 6 , A nJb /X d F
/t RE% 0 PRocCb dKE tS Im t! Ffnt /tr/ LLE.
INSPECTOR (S): 34W 4- 7s 44/ EE f
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
thSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS-JS PAGE NO.: A-17
,
'
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y2. / PAGE NO.: J/9 2 -//
TS REQUIREMENT: vcRI FV LNGES ARC /4/ sPro 4-T THE
S PECs ro er D
_
T in1 E S
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: srr-oso soo/ ISSUE DATE: 3/z//pr REV.: o
TITLE: Poaja. h usrmavriod tisu rs v ce, p '
o c.wrvoy
YES 0
N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? No r ycRipegy
Is installed system consistent with TS? Alo7- vene: Pres
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or y
editorial ?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? X '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should do r VCRIF/S,d
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? Y
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
h ,
$u)FllER-, TNE APPLIC A A/T 's PROCCDUR6'S R EQ htR F A
WALQou) Al Pet o R. To Procr.he>RE oSE, MD /sr
0F A REV. O Proc [ht'R C IS I nt PERM e.rsi 6 L E .
INSPECTOR (S): .b A L.E A. *i *o tdrR r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
.,
'
INSPECTOR (S):
l
lhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-JS PAGE NO.: A-If
_ . -- . . - - __
-.
.- ..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
-
m
! TS PARA: 3, 3, ..I
~
- e PAGE NO.: ?/M f-l 22'r8-9
TS REQUIREMENT: 45 A marev _ TW /VAcrea //2*ncr/,s JWaw f airygues tees
CffAaas t.f SikM ta TM LC 3. 3. l- 1 SMc BE e f tnA8L6. 84 1 711 TM
JM4cott PM 74LvoJ J41Nm AEstoHM T1h^t. til .rf4 & IH TM L ! .1.2. I ~ 2.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: A)/A ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE: N/A *
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V 4
Is installed system consistent with TS? A//I
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)? #
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? N/f # '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should N//
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? A//d
REMARKS: 00MMe's L 60 s4 t rW P rA l M Nett.se esa sNranin.
SMent. # * t'oes tA>v h vao.
(
t/
- A){i = Her tastocru , W/A e $cr Alttrcgeti
'
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
9l4
INSPECTOR (S): u!. F. 3 M ITFl
FOLLOWUPACTION:plNSPECTIONREPORT50-458/
YES 0
.N_0
Were problems corrected? ,.
-
.
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
/'~'T INSPECTOR (S):
'
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Fi-3 f PAGE NO.! A -l'l
I
. .
.
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 3. l. I Sumaiert PAGE NO.: 3/V3-f
TS REQUIREMENT: Euk AfS instrument cheetgel shall 64 dem,nskafc/
ottvebit by perfore,anet of cheesel e.kakn fundi *eal festa(calib><fre,,
hs * hrike 89 era +7 ens l conditions /frequenties s% % f e af. s. l.1 ~ I
- ISSUE DATE: REV.: -
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
-
TITLE: -
YES JLO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 N/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? F[4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or r/4
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? F/A '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should %
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [4 ^^^
REMARKS: Of St 'lS $7t's inyItmest;ng %is sweekut, 35 were wsIkal
Atwn by lleensee ,154, wtre Welkod dowen . A.nA of were nef Gsven( C509-%YI
%re 4544) n ItU'were ruleu.0 boy ike AM Iot tre lere , trentomi conw,c,.ts :
Too meer "LATtcots'; su T/g Frr,oeshes pagerred : $ t m g h u s , h ,.se ( g e ry , d , ,, )
N kth At 111} frytederts tn $,8,.%f serreg ,i.t $0s.%ests.* vnt stre ovt rdo %I
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED *\t O'rS M bf.
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
INSPECTOR (S): W.F.Smiik
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES JLO
Were problems corrected?
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-M PAGE NO.: 4 40
- - - - - - - - --
J - -
-
7
- "
.
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
( )TSPARA: 4.3. /. I PAGE NO.: 3[(( 3 - (
TS REQUIREMENT: Fact / R!T tainedMcgwet rian as osacarroyA
stMAda By ffsre ova.otA. of citAwa t creet Mcnont 7ttr e- cAtidMped
n
e rr.' Fwt- TWd dokA noat t- ewo n nos/ /M-4 *ts e r IN TMLC 4.3.1.(-I.).a.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO :S7/-608( '/206 ISSUE DATE: I2 /2f"/t / REV.: O
TITLE: RPS/ceMol. Ron 8 Lot:lc tastw&&IThnoJ-ItM "F"cHw*'ec cat-tittA DOM
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER arid TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should s-
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: # STP-soy hoc 15 ftMitM N Co< ~ 'f201 7NA H +2 o t* , Fett IS'M CHM 4Lf
, o4 ntatt H. nearHI seten, counn.n sannr de r' wess wan ws sem
1 O,3 boa busr umrie 1,
l
STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
'
Oko 0Lturv4yc *t t.4 7cs * ra hM 2 .g, gab 2. , 8 + LLiseue e )
@l (rXaveed arcadet ervevs,(Liamor)
INSPECTOR (S): L~1* F fM i #/
'
FOLLOWUP ACT!0N: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
7 YES NO
Were problems corrected? _
.
Were any other problems identified? ,
1
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
( D INSPECTOR (S):
I
' "' INSPECTION REPORT 50 458L FJ-35 PAGE NO.: d-Il
k,. -
. -
- . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . . _ . _ . - . _
- -- ___ _ ____
r
--
'
_4. 3 . ) *</,.7. 6
4, 3 . la
-
- .-
s r P - o oo . ,,,, 9 9',.f, /
MD.Sr N L .54*L M
0 S rf - S~o Y- Y2o s - o g t o E FCEP T :
L( 501 - og*W /
ST'$ Sso-h2So ~~ g 5 / Se 2-
C p o - y2 S 2 - r.3
@ F # # ' Y l f/ - 5 8 LJ p
e
gg g _ gf f
/
\,
V lo t - o r fu / - - u- e.. a ,
"' ~
\ y ro l - o 8' v> '
/
OS
8as~oc(gQ /
j so3 L{ So 3 - o C
(9 6 0 5t ~ 42.o t- 0g w l 703 - 42'3 '06 69$
so@ @
'
Ly m - 6 4 w wl /
.~
so, - q22. zr 2.
0 qu}-t2. a ,
@ @i- nothovsw [' c
<f sol - o\ (/
/
@ (so f- 4101 - o'T 'v>"# j ,
/ -
@ pCg2(2. -o 9 (Hof as * ') #'^d
so6 07 W
.
g
0 tot -! +112- f 8 da
/
Co. - [ l$l - Y-Y Y g
(fil9-Z2.4W]
'
C ~.w,
.. I
@ s o E- - 0 6 o l Na
} S O Fr 0 2 o l e
O
_ -
e .
.
l
.
- .
l
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA _CONIINUATION SHEET
fn
G '
.
IS PARA: I.3.l.I PAGE NO.: k~I -
Conc,rrs :
'
@ (RM Iav CAT 7+3 M E esF o w * A-C % (outt,' Tuk ke *r' feowene.
wt er tacognee1n
2.& 4 2. t + com,J 'twx " ropa m as.ms os
(1) PAAss.
-
itJW /LE M .
"
h (J e4rA I .3. (.1 Me I.2.3. 2 "l%E fsspuucy s g," Rc4.s/sc.
puseur sN: ~
o
$ '7.f.2.( n w < ~7 t. 2 2.3 sdouts s!*r HAvE siceofer. tr- ant 4U 7Wr_
.(tipolff & telb uc/? fM ie41YL*] g/fLifJ 7W40cctleur faccww.
h TMLL T ACCUTWCL (sty ra MS go y (,g,ty, ' y c ff , g g c 3 ,J
), e ., '/EC/l S/EC fr 6 llO, Th%E Z /s' (10 lGrAc7z.y ,'?} ,
I84tBt T Suriz1t twer AtAcvcseer. oc. i;nca
@ Tile is/dP
.u- c yg c d , is 6 211 H fa
M M 71/L Uhrh*/ W- D.4*d EXflC7th. 'Thll (
same Wws o+ p*e s.ua > 06 0s63. 74r locarn' rpfws) /wist
.
-_
A40VA Cl lW Clyf/(f. f) * *
$ ~[l$ 790 L h& _ &_tflC//)o/1l }$
~^ c) u c.e. ws wraa .s 2r.<c.<o m a e m u m ses.
(d t'
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4 W/ 8S-35 PAGE NO.: k'M
- ... .-. . . -
I
* '
. . .
*
'.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
-
TS PARA: . 4. .'i, / .1 PAGE NO.: 3N 3-I
TS REQUIREMENT: EACH RVS tervtun< tar chad d L KRALL CL DEMod57M 7th
MeJth S Lt sy hEsS*RMu el CF CHA0"LL. CHECil, MCTrodAL TEST k cal.leBADed
oes.
*
fort n u orsupoa t. eneonm)(Fewk<sC in TABLL 4 3.l. f l , l.A. ,
O
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:ST/-Soff-Dd7 ISSUE DATE: I-4-fs
REV.:
TITLE: A.PS[aW7mec Aas Aem-innemo. AAW,4 mree"6*cg4 EL Rsenowc. 7a37- 4
YES N_0,
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? 7
L
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
I
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V '
-
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should L.
work as written?
4
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V'
' REMARKS:# 5 rp S'oy 4947 r3 Steert4e. re 377 - s o *( . <f ses T yde., 4 5 o f fee fg m
OCftCthCIC$ OVE
i
CP/AktLS A TWedd N. C4#YNfd5 ff*4 M L- f4M*NL
a ce. w o n e . w o oco e.s > DaApr wmaa .L
;
STATUS OF ITEM COPEb CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? *
\
036- Carres procels>w as seurkJ.CG%see)
\ Oy3
L wsei musV tat <>ookk "LAtht",% psmy( k. 7
l l j INSPECTOR (S): L4).F. INITW
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
-
Were problems corrected? "
! t
Were any other problems identified?
! OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
l I
O inseccToa(s):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ TS-35
PAGE NO.: k-)-)
.
v. ,,----a ,--,e,-n . , , . - - - - .,,,,.,,,.,.-n,.,w.,n---, -,m, . -,v.,,.-,,ww-.-- w,-,-, .n,..n-,- ~---.--,---.-..-,y - - - ~ , - . - . ,
..
.
' '
, .
.
TI CHNICAl. SPEClflCATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
,em
i h
t, 1
v '
IS PARA: . 3. [. I PAGE NO.: 3 [ Y J '~ l
-
STp-5o4-4s07 co m u u r s :
3 p. 7 wrnas n 1sw' w w /1g" is isco~n m.
. _
-@ _
tam woremos su asceon r, ss " % h~a.' piuaw-r
'
_
puesmc. 7ms <r reau er. ..
@ 7. l . I. I r>,ue w 7.t. 1. L V d a io r 4 y e st e w r. rr Awaer'
wr stuwr ve>s a r c/rssou't ossroswa s wr traon.
@ yw .t Accerace esanna it u <ao r. t. A a . reca. srscs.,
m
t.e., _ rrc4. .riec . ir S po, wir y i7 nofersen.v ?) .
'
(9 fueusa Mfin v. "t.sf r ovaw Poisrs." zvs scwrn
'
ric y g r " is M jf.frafb t.J 1M /4cEJust! . 7HE /4 c 7tscH.stcOf,J
.
e-o.*e w 'r s'y r k .s.
(,w>vept zMl u4cc0*>.id
~7. l . T CoyatCTT '79fE fo?!Tivl L 64h CG TUL dVt*f- T* A +Da-EstrwT'
,, ,
,.1A ctC ~ 7pt .stccAL LtJ6C AM PL t F t E-{, i.e.,
,,
Tf2 T @ t.h GL ,, I2-
l'f. % .l- 7taa 9, M f.f.(. I3-l(o, tet Ch1Hil, ALL SEtJG coAALC# 14 D/MT
lSutRY I ra AGeta 7?/ As tiac*Ml'T" s&cttMv. Plocovas. srp car- 42 ot
k
17 por pftr& CoAMC bU hk.fA"E lMAIS"' INA O
f
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4{V/_85-JJ PAGE NO.: k "> V
- . _ . _ .
. .
._ - - - . _ _ - .
_. _ .
,. .
-
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA 5HEET
g
b TS PARA: 4. 3, / .1 PAGE NO.: 3[i 3 -I
TS REQUIREMENT: EACH RPS terrivM6JT CHMkfL SMLL DE DEM0057M M
opeJth s LE ay PErneMucE ' ce cucaL CHECW, RM/C71oJAL 7usT k CAlteMDod
o ps .' fort nu en.umon t worriw){FMG tes' tN TABLE 4 3.(, f l. %hfQalI*9
it
o #/#l'
ISSUE DATE: r[tV[rp REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:5TP-ooo' oos /
TITLE: h4It'1 O f 6M-T'14 Lo 6 5 '
YES g
7
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
7
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or v
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
V '
M / 'E
Does,the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
2, 3, V, S . fischuAl
REMARKS: tW 2-9 %vLb 40 IW?dtelo At 09. Cowu. ,
t
DJc't ps&orul ef. con. G. 4 3,l./ f
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
0>4 Correh ,drettAM tfroVS llitessee}
INSPECTOR (S):
W 6 fa t TV
,
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES Q
q
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
rPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S): "
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ P S-U
PAGE NO.: A ->J
I
l
;
.
., ..
,
l
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
q
O TS PARA: 4. 3, l . J PAGE NO.: 3['[ 3 - I
l
TS REQUIREMENT: EACH RPS teritumor cuAsett rs4tL ca esnosrx4 7a
cdA%LL CHECK, RWC7toJAL TKsT k CAlleMD04
OttOLA B Lt B't PEkkRMAM CE OP
09s.' fett. rm cre.txno4L ce dorTi w ) {Fefe 4 tif in TABL6. 4 3.f. f l _ ,
C
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:ST7 585 '/2e5 ISSUE DATE: 2./to /fS REV.:
TITLE: RPSh&dTNeLAe9QLeCC~kH h ( % ML CAL ($8AheAl
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? 7 ~D<-,4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
7
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g[I
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
REMARKS: # s Yf - SeS- 4Laf of .frurtAt re $W- SOS- (2a t rgau yte r, 44.
(3 Ath carviv A ruta it
O
4
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN hL0SEh
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S):
R. G SM 8 W
'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
-
Were problems corrected? ~
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5-JI
PAGE N0.: 4W
. - . . _. - _ - -__ - _ ._. -. _.
-_
, .. .
,
.
*
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
O. U TS PARA: 4.3. / .1 PAGE NO.: 3b 3 -I
TS REQUIREMENT: EACH R PS terreve97 cuAun rsAu. aa unosr>< 7a
opeJL A B LE B'1 PEAR *RheAn cE oP CelA0**eL CFIECd, 50WC71oJA L TEST A. CALisPAT1oM
09S.' GotL n u oec_rmed L ceJP rTlaJJ ffMG*&t-!af fn TABLE 4 3. l. l I e.3 ,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:Trp- 457- Nd9* ISSUE DATE: /1//>[di / REV.: O
TITLE: kPSf0M Atf STipt paus eussuu Hick c to s c- c A t t d.
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is instelled system consistent with TS? v'
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
V
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
4105'puu (L .
REMARKS?STf-PSI- 4200 S/MetN Tv SW ~os/
CHece of -rput ador estterfor.*T, tWb cow 7)Mne
f&tLJ "To W'OL M *.s 719t 't
C6v4 M S>t rot ehe- tverr Am fpcodAL b % ctr. cots, s s4 Lee s b s w a
b(2AFf k&dssteJ d.
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? *
OF3
Correcf prvteJ4/rr orYprs(L/teasec}
INSPECTOR (S): W. F. SM #7h/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
"
Were problems corrected? .
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS: t,
. >
I
(] INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE N0!: A-*47 [
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Fi-3f
.
*a'
.
- - , - - - . _ , - . - - . - . - , , . . - - -
. ..
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
\
TS PARA: 4..I./.1 PAGE NO.: 3['[ 3 -I
TS REQUIREMENT:
EACH Rps tornemtsr cwetL 2RAU. QE MMcMW 7th
CHA0nLL CHECK, RWCnoJAL TEST k CAudBAnow
OttJLA SLt B4 PE V*tM M CE OF
fort n u o r u n w M L anonw)/FRM4tfC in TABLE. 4 3. l. In l o b_,
*
ops.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: IT1 -05t-4M/ ISSUE DATE: dT//G[T$
8 REV.: O
TITLE: 595 ~/441? Sr6 W4 w a (Sol-. vat l - c. t.o.r.uk
t
YES N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? L-
Is installed system consistent with TS? &
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or a-
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
[ '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should A//.c
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
NA4 f-M.,y ,
REMARKS: 5 W -05(- 4263 ts se m w To ST/-ort- 4ic(
E.tr. &ser. re.rr /;legsbe*y pesanter/ l. T2)y s%vs.4 se Nonph'1
mio ,,o rsed r/t c Acce>T. VAlv4 (t,c).
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? *
0>y (gyyu j e nuc) ort u ren Cl.lunpe)
INSPECTOR (S): LJ . F . .IM i "TM
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
e
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 1 5-3 5 PAGE NO.: /&-h?
i
!
. .. .
'
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
p U TS PARA: 4.3,l.I PAGE NO.: 3['[ 3 - l
TS REQUIREMENT: EACH RPS terneversi c w a n t rs4u. aa esnaar>< 7e6
opeJLA S LE B4 PER kFMAN CE OP CSIAonLL CHECK, Mc71odA L TEsr k CAUdMnod
3. l. ( l , @
09s: h tL rus ors.t w u M L antTIM){Fuebe-!&C IN TABLE 4 ,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 37P-Coo Vlo2? I SSUE DATE: Id/t [t( REV.: O
TITLE: k?S-SCMn bactl. s/ouel usw. c.sv4.14ty cgwc cA c e a ,
YES &
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? v
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or t'
editorial)?
V
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should bl[I '
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: * S#- Sea- V2 2 .rtutcat w sns s o * - VAo 2. W 4141
c.ouTMa /
sre-s.o- 4 Q t ruw 4sb4 tw fw~'em~ * c.su ers .
L4 TG r ^ id 8 !4MCM/I&}
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR l'0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7
CLOSED
'
OV7 .hplem sd la +ert G.ra su \
INSPECTOR (S): u>. F. IM i 77J -
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES &
e
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ fi-JI PAGE NO.: 4 -Fi
,
~_ . - _ . __ . _. ..
< ,
>.
'
; .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M. 3. l .1 PAGE NO.: 3[i 3 -I
TS REQUIREMENT: EACH RPS tetztuntar c m o EL SUU.OE bfMcM W 7%
oteJASLt B4 M.kkakAN CE cp CHA0nLL C44ECK, RWCh*ML TKsT k Call &RATlod
fort rm costawML conrTiw) {ftWEAtfC IN TABLE. 4 3.t. l
I, iI ,
o p s .'
- REV.: ---
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:.f e"/ M-(28/I ISSUE DATE:
'
-
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
7
V
Is installed system consistent with TS?
V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
-
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
No @0dAL.S A)oT t.S ta t) \ S Tf ~ 5 * t - f l. 1-) 'j)Vst Y2.{t{
REMARKS:
.
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
ON ~Ess V1C enn. carts (Lwwe 1
INSPECTOR (S): ca/. F. .rm TH
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
.
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE N0.: A--3 0
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-35
__ _. - ._ ._.- _ _ _ _ _ . . _ -
-. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ - . _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - -
pg1-X4/O l
P&<e h p- P l 'l e$ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
p c, r / l
p c.1 t- >
TS PARA: t/, "). / / PAGE NO.: 2 /e/ 3 - / + W 6 /e. V,7./,f .f 4, y _p
TS REQUIREMENT: 54 g r scof ee.f,. ' r vr A m' c/ u n f. 34.L clu ,,, / s4,ph e
I
.
J e ~=_ ,L 4d CPEM61.F L W mf.. ,.fu ., & & C/Hypst c/fCfr. C//ble f?/4tl~io#4L ten
+ (J/A>'stI_ (A/JMATion/ &Nsr b- fh &lMA7ttwnL rnn'h T710b't CE fest.oureoir s.We % 3.1,te
#
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: 3rp.he -co o r ISSUE DATE: frh v /cv REV.: o
' '
TITLE: T 1 ,'/v ChL' lo. e
/ ' / / -
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 3//A f A.,,pecf
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or y
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should 7
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? //
+
REMARKS: A // l.vSb%d aee. S o/a e e_. M /o c ,4 / m s w [s '
dw v rt-e o o -e ao r _ cect. I ~ a /I
I
b' VA. 2.-' J. ~L / Kev a ve v!-f i dn Ma c'</
/ f
ss b 17- XGlo ,n- S T'P co o m a s ! .
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
.f W va na af,. + w el.i prL vo Y' sl eilklc.{s-
(SrP-ooo-cooI does
O cL'l b e o d . E ss /, An
$, hy Yr/ A> ,j ec i d d' s / oga-ave / Le]9 _
OL. / ,
INSPECTOR (S):h//A-Oo [ M,
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPdCTIONREP0850-458/;- -
YES N0_
Were problems corrected?
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95I- H PAGE NO.: A-- 31
I
.- _ _ ..
. - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ . _ . _-
._.
. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
(74We D.u 4)
TS PARA: '-/',1 / . / PAGE NO.: './A/ 7 -/ -f- 7/ y 3 - 7
~
TS REQUIREMENT: Clauw / (L k . C 44., u / pu. c. M . / / E, / m ,< c A a 4. /
c.n ( % M h b c r h n O 6 d L ' - Af y 4'. i. /. /- /. 7
frQv - t 2 +.f.
LIC. 'PROCEbuRE NO.: Trp- v //-Y2o(ISSUE DATE: t/<,r/ c e-- REV.: O
TITLE: 8 PS /Z'r./d' Ache M ' 8 f 2. T NU 'JfA ZW 6 o/e4 Q - A4h
CW Ni C4fib s k (1> t 7-yso '3 A *W'W h'M10h)
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? p/2 #0h I' wop ,7
Is installed system consistent with TS?
-'
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? y
Does procedure c ry out TS requirement?
'
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Haslicenseecompletegggedurewalkdown?
REMARKS: -7h'e. aled K. 5 % f. - TrP- T // - 4 2 oz , v 2 on + 4:to Y
1?a ve a r e "La lev ' t /*A r du a// rWe , l~bo l d ort Y 0.' P rw ea., ?
STATUS OF ITEM
@
FOR "0 PENS" WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
STP-oi Vo! he t 'EA IEl<0 w Avs 'M . W /. + V 4 Not toltol A us lu e s
()y MPd do be k s lecl A cl Q Ehreve [ beNr 04. -rti;z ; ,ul,'r , h
4. d, noco L<n Id kl d'WturM_e,i.vror ISSUE DATE: 2/t</ P r REV.: o TITLE: I?PS/Ero/M Ack,C -M stI he F/w 44 606'-/g chae d Foc W I *Gs f ( p (7 ~XCo to V) Skl#fft A - N0 Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? p 'd /(> f J e n >e c. h ' Is installed system consistent with TS? f Are there any problems with the TS (factual or h. editorial)? j fe ,r A V Does proceduregcarry out TS requirement? ' Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V work as written? Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? REMARKS: D 17-k 6 /o "R . C . d Ts are M saw e , s o /m_, - er,cro/urer (A// /tdut iskw ~*e ' bce / V W ri/ rd-Yro ( . yeat ./ ares')=iv e $4 sAsd/ * be. N 5% e_ 5e c4mle A,r1r,4-d STATUS OF ITEM @ FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN? , 4 57e CLOSED A1 26 er a/rci. Vro 3, [/ 30 y h9e/ .#a b /r e //-y roi '
oy j mv/4, e ,Ac4/ -
J ,Wid
-
, LL.l cx-,
-
INSPECTOR (S): T M_ -
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPdbTION' REP 0d50-458/m. s
YES JLO
.
Were problems corrected?
*
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-35 PAGE N0.: 4 ') )
- .
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/4.93,f.) PAGE NO.: J/y 3 -11
TS REQUIREMENT:
Channel check, chanel Funchon.I +eJ, anJ
'
Clu n n eI talT bi che n OferuNoni
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: Sre .>47 917 _ ISSUE DATE: J/v/FI REV.: O
TITLE: (d m Isols%n -RctC Sftum Sver\v '
fressure C% el (<l%fo% (E3I-Nuh Al
-
E31 - Ni,754) YES _N.O._
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 /
Is installed system consistent with TS7 /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should v'
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: 1) froredore as wdf/eni clocs nof Segrib 3l du v thanne l
- 1 i
behb./
Sfh Ctf fles}t'ftL hV fL n rht f f ft l'tst Y[t) o1 t
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
d I-itenset m oS V inflrrnen t ,terrocle'<H,, reyviremenb U F 4ech a u.I Sft s fh ka,.;
m
INSPECTOR (S): l as A. d m ate M
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
.
Were problems corrected?
-
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75 -3 5 PAGE NO.: k-JY _
j
- --
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/4 . 93.4.) PAGE NO.: 3/4 3 -11
TS REQUIREMENT:
Channel check, Chanel FuncHonal iest and
'
dan n d cal,%% n oeerakans
LIC PROCEDilRE NO.: STf-Sc/ VM ISSUE DATE: ##/4 /JV REV.: 6
TITLE: Ne A ik L a hieh -M ; $fm L7, e F( , #44 CA. ., e / (, /; 4,,+,A
C b 18 - NUQ5A * C- n ~*t,t t A)
'
ygs yo
__o
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #4
Is installed system consistent with TS? A(rg
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
/
.3
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: d freu ds*1'3 4s subbths his M$ $redh 3l day che<nd
fueu.4 tonal +tn+ .at oeevire,$ hv $teks'co$ freaft eNoes. N) $$ts
'
reivher n $!N<eff ' WW N adthe nt een o/rd. 3) fm* don dm
~
n0f smu%, h N nuone oumswh %f it serd.i a so.4rsn */ %
'
leert. hvch' fvecN hsf
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? '
03)
s) Litesset nokInwltof psn'ofeihr yneefreer /s & Monkl ora %4ku
031 v) Wuw merf ex 4d f vmeda
035 n ween mal- meef erwehre
INSPECTOR (S): 6/s A. donatM
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES PLO
.
Were problems corrected?
-
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ 8 5-35 ,
PAGE NO : 4-3C
-.
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET ,
I
'
TS PARA: J/y , 93,L J PAGE N0.: 3/y 3 -11
Cbann t I check, Chanel Funcunal +est, and i
TS REQUIREMENT: '
C k nnel cali brc.fie n o f eru fions
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: cTf-est-YJay ISSUE DATE: is/ss/Py REV.: O
TITLE: Isolation Ac+vwh'bs /hsLT- Muln Steam Line frnsurr Lcw Gannel (util,an han (obs. Nun A
'
ygg
%st 6rt-Ns)G A ) .no_
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #/4
Is installed system consistant with TS? . A/'4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
*
/ '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: 0 Vratelart 35 wis0% dues nub specihr 3l day channtl
'
'
FsnchuaI +n+ as requitect sy +echniluI sfectfica Ava . hvade
not walk J desn
STATUS OF ITEM GPED CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
Lhenee mast- inrI<a raf pers'odicity replaments c> F +eanic I
0%
ye a fica 4h ns
INSPECTOR (S): We/(.8eeudf'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
_YES NO
-
Were problems corrected? -
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Fi-Jf
PAGE NO.: h-36
. _
-
'
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: .3/4,93.4.J PAGE NO.: 3/4 3 -11
TS REQUIREMENT: ChanneI check; chu,d Funchul +es t, artJ
Ch4 n n el cali bnfio n oferuffons
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: Srr- m -Val ISSUE DATE: II/)/Py REV.: o
TITLE: A/H<s //t wc v Ma a ste 1 L7,,o Tu n ne i Te ~e..f vre - 14 4 C 6 </ cyt h A
'
-
CEh-(,o3A,0 31-/47/4 ( t-U-Ittol) YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and-TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
/ .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: e) f,weJort a 5 wMin. dses not sAxif, 31 </av chanel Foutton<l ferf or re.virc.f
h, tecknkt sredfr%4 car d trutdee Ghh nmer LATVits inelujr %e%, Gillrie
0 CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT Y WHEN? '
Liunst mosf I) l%lemo.f verrodidtv y teoireer.li o f- tea,ca.a t s ye< t R aako,n ud
CS7 ' '
'
QQ 2) st1(uvrouale luft.3
INSPECTOR (S): lde A.4d44t N
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
-
Were problems corrected?
-
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ N-35 PAGE NO.: h- D
i
'
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: .3/4 . 93,4.) PAGE NO.: 3/4 3 -11
TS REQUIREMENT:
Chann el check, Chanel Funch,ml +es t an d
Ch n n el cal; bec.fic n oteruNons R>r tien <tro, i)n e A re ct
Te~ e m +va - % h (Tv,wm 6'S )
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE: *
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: [rucelurer n0i" iS504l.
STATUS OF ITEM M
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
Lheast e mo d ?5500 f roudom. N ttl at u g h r eg r e w p ,v t e j a r t y
031
INSPECTOR (S): We4.dt8tsefY
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NC
-
Were problems corrected?
-
Were any other problems identified? ,
OPEN CLOSED
'
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
._
"
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FJ-JJ PAGE N0.: 4-39
i L_ _. . _ _ - _ _ _ ___--____ -
.. - -
*
, .. l
-TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
i
TS PARA: .3/4 . 93. L ) PAGE NO.: 3/4 3 -il
TS REQUIREMENT:
Channel check, Chanel Funchon.l +a r, an d
C\w n n el cal; bec.fic n o f tru fions
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STr-ost- n 57 ISSUE DATE: la45/Pi REV.: O
TITLE: N 5sif- fonJhscr Vacuum- le CLnel Gl; bro fre (6 ar-Nof 4; r} >t- Nuna )
e
'
YES J_O
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: 1) frocedv<c . 45 wr$ta, doet Mf specify 3 I clav cho n,iel Furic O nl
+ts+ as resuireel be treknlcul wedfas fiss , L) htcericNe CMrs.% lis fe el is %
km seVro!nV lret'e.l % frAnTY see<ifrc %, vite % a lloaate vu Ise
'
Ej is no t lid *) as A minimsm er madenum va lt ) 3 ) (Arbt ) carshiw
hft,&se i J. , T d le V PrseeJuee a d wtIle.l M
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
OYo
Lruauf mui f I) e,n, fem ent periodrcity rewtic, weds v A ficknTrul Svedffro htu
ea a s ce mW on orc lmaac'e..n,oJ
'
01l wl 5) litt wrcbrta It < l< e r k< < cri
01L 3) Acertsa k All9t r
INSPECT 0lk(S): ld,4. Alsse < &
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES _N_0
.
Were problems corrected? -
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
;
REMARKS:
*
INSFECTOR(S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FJ-JS
PAGE N0.: A-- M
_ _ _ _ _ _
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/y . 93.L J PAGE NO.: 3/4 3 -11
TS REQUIREMENT:
Channe l check, cho.ncl FuneHon.I +e3 t, an d
Ck nnel call bnfic n oferafions
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STf-sur -4 wl ISSUE DATE: n/as/75 REV.: O
TITLE: MS/Isolefron Advatten ratheenfefien 0,v.,eaf Pers= - fft ht CA=44 sl ce(76 4w
(,C11-40Ss A ; C18-#6s*4 ; C7:-Nf,58 ) cis-N 6n)
-
YES g
Is there ar.y difference between FSAR/SER and-TS7 /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? [ '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: 1) froccJure , at wMem 40*< nef tradfv 31 dm daneel fe.cffbael
4rst ns reevitt) by 4eeknlad cdecifie'dleNe . 5) kleIkkown of praelart reveelst
"
" '
numernes nam a ! fe*< urerr bEtween er*udart <>ul entsh sevi
" f metf- L' '",s
; . '* - licenste kel soF wsikJ down ermd tre 4e veh A nroselevt uAn
htenbare Ckiferin in fith 4,nj 9tli kyt re4yjet/ eg'g4, g fgghykgg (,,,y }
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
04) D lletscet. onesf insteneth we+Td$ttelv tt4Wirtomed5 Of 4teienlenl Sytsfk4 nee
'
'
01'l __>) Usence< mek ws tl<d. e & cerru4-froerd o , 04S 1) Qwe tesvif" cweek 1ru etkort af) lo% set mesf corree} seeretA M
'
hSPECTOR(S): k/ s fl.11estdaf
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
-
Were problems t.orrected?
-
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff- 3.f PAGE NO.: P YO
-
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3/V.4.3.3.l PAGE NO.: }/v 3-#
'
'*4 .* Criterrh in #GITaw> . Y) Ta6f( VM V $ ,, ud Y C -p '
srectks) { t$ in), Mo'AlmW > Ad *sa sI* ** val'!J x. k .6
01 4 f ,w .w . .:.. y)
.
.
" #
.
h
INSPECTION REPORT 50-498/ FS-M PAGE N0.: 4-Vl
I
-
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
! TS PARA: Jh . 93,L J PAGE NO.: 3/4 3 -11
TS REQUIREMENT:
Channe.l check, c.hctnel FuncHonal +es t an d
'
c3nn n ei coli bnfio n orcrufions
i
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ST(MI') */nl ISSUE DATE: 3/1/P5 REV.: O
TITLE: Vrivnay Confednmenf fant Tsola five Radialton ~Hnh Mtv;tv tkh Chwel
Calibrdica U itMsktLHg A) (Gnh n,ej ) 'ng
-
l
ygg
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? F//}
Is installed system consistent with TS? N//,
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? ! '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should N//}
I work as written? l
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: s) 6on rol;brafik a n d fo nt hht al feit c roie,ls,er h a ve n umervu
'
lOtvs int laJin., Acc es ha,,, , C ri h < ra A STP-n o 'N ot has several oroceJnt
'
e r ro r s ', a ) Alv te nu emeni L equhumend utarmva, l,) Stro 1.l.S u esnd
'
releaf* e nowl s f ta fo deuudoli NerL,n Prm edas ' c ) fe r fo r atu nc e o f s fem
_uksaoulo) w151, Tale Ylg df' AHucked & {{ confusiny censt auer$lt (cen%e))
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM COPEJD
FOR "0 PENS",WHO MUST 00 WHAT_ BY WHEN?
Licensee mos+4 ru lemed luter; anddcorrecf 'ortueJare err $ g ~
'
OY7 '
' '
oV9
INSPECTOR (S): Avsfl.8dAnd
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
-
Were problems corrected?
-
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7i-3J PAGE NO.: A - Y a. _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
r 1
-
, ,
l
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
l
1
TS PARA: 3/'/ Vd. A l PAGE NO.: N't 3 -l/
1
Prueede,< No, sie-asM5v6 , (ten,Q, cale J ah3/2t T;lle: Primry
Centniconent 90YY IsoI"% iludi'drc' ~ It'sh AcklIy 4 sikr Chan eel l
f vachal Te3t t ir,itst stcata)
.
.
Renr ks 'la\ ves fo r 4<. tidle ere u nclea r , froaddre .
n0Y toalke) down
- .
.
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45f/ 15-13 PAGE NO.: A-43
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: .3/f , 93,4.J PAGE NO.: 3/4 3 -11
TS REQUIREMENT: Channel check; chanel Func%nal +est, and
c\un n el call brdic n oterakons
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: fir est-W ISSUE DATE: is/nhv REV.: 0
TITLE: #9865 -6Mesiti his, Leetl -6 tawi le.elaf W te , L , ts.el 1,clie..e( (= N#3
'g
'
-
(6 nt-Notl 4) 6k-Nstl 4', 0>t-N6n A) ygg
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 #/g
Is installed system consistent with TS? F//1
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or ./
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
! '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: d 75 Mlt I.7. All i 'irI IVEkh Is4. SW [I9r A *VI.5 lu4dt" 5%
be"h-W.5 Fache/! 1) fewArt ss wrTW89.has nEf esed& )l M eka.d
% +ienni itst si reseleel bw 44& EsediRaek.rN . YruedN nut'
' ' '
walhi lown.
STATUS OF ITEM 6PEO CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
0't) W3 t.Mrub% Yee0Er d." G Ltante ont4& n' Adit rJ notents.rtv
QS Q _ y_gt u ir e net . h e W 4 a A a % $ 9 ,s er) N e e k
INSPECTOR (S): W.fl.litantY
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50 458/
YES M
-
Were problems corrected?
-
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/ SS-V PAGE NO.: 4-Y V
J
_ _ _ _
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/'t 4.1. J. / PAGE NO.: ) /v 3 -l /
TS REQUIREMENT: (dauf/ clell( , cl ie4nd funt&%l Farf- , a
Ch n ntl telibra l'% vutNifw3
-
.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 409-06# ISSUE DATE: 1/I/1.f REV.: o
TITLE:
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V/1
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or [ 7a
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should y/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? t/
REMARKS: 0 Tlt nof t (a) in Ta%IC '(,3,11 -l for inucal feif fa+1W4
t h<se tl Ps ne N esel +est is een festee a.ed ette fvr inkoniniku
' :L) The channel func4iewl 4taf fvr de< ua I MNaf9n of mel, sf w
.line. Tsd laklen tun b t f trfunn ed wih edF Atfvs i foi}fn4% . No
Crett0d**s (JIFF OU Hrform ON $ tab *
'
STATUS OF ITEM 'h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
ost 0 NAC mas 4 ddernint resetten,eaf fue Pu ,e+;,n +<sIta; fur
os.t manoat w +t< iron el clutfv iwh a. Etsverva<d >) %eme<
' '
in es4 d e velev preteAvrts for naia s0n** Vat helah% 4tt4% and
~ '
'
Gel +s4
INSPECTOR (S): be(L. den 4 e #-
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
.
Were problems corrected?
*
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ fi-7f PAGE NO.: A -VS
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: WV 'l l'AI PAGE NO.: 1/43-l/
&' h S '.dettr a w IF outr SyS0tMs cu \re hled fw
mnval ML%n w%k ukily inih% & At
I
3f ibm.
.
.
s
.
4
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4)(/ Pr-15 PAGE NO.: 4 Y6
! k
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/I . 93, A.) PAGE NO.: J/y 3 -11
TS REQUIREMENT:
Channe l check, chanel Font %nal te.st, an d
'
c3un n el cali bn u n 0,f t ro fien t
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: SU u1-4au ISSUE DATE: #>h t /s v REV.: O
TITLE: ikotu Kreis Olffminit<l Flow C.%el catii,rstro,. (t ss.NonA : s so-weso: en-koxA) '
'
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should ./
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: D frauddet .tst wvi Ain, Outi 110t Meifu 3I das c%ael font +tnf
+ts+ .as reaulend bo fathnieAf settifienhns ' L) froNdvre M wri AtL
was nef uIwkuLit )Estender ces t arttert readin] 41) und$ <dt'sch l1 '
aal ware no+1oertfu'ad la 1(e oosaed wr *, U %>neah.s m reous,,) +v
'
raskE waL ', - ernt. 3 .eere. Irtk.I I'n los was.,e.J: O itwas n# '
'@
'
STATUS OF' ITEM CLOSEb '
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
09 Is l?testal nast D*situod verIDAltift YaquirtMinh ! f k4a tal sent:1fL4% '
' '
CH }kteekt
*. Lrtseere
trift rh 6t* mitYusuturio&
mest teniedt nroaodera
Ated fu y 9 in AeLe
rovidl91 e stetts Tf wuduss
INSPECTOR (S): _lvill: 8tn a c Y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES JLO
Were problems corrected? .
-
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S): _,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS-33 PAGE NO.: A d/1
, e ,
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ ____
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
l
TS PARA: 3/v V.3.1,f PAGE NO.: 5/y NI
4.) settifie) is ut. f ratedert , affW wr\kAwn, OtStr $tte kert ,
caIri,rdw % or- n.diostn te u o+en%eks.
r d) Ashr ruase
_ stuik</ fev- +essing was wrw, and +herefere wrvy v&es wasQ
hat sten 06Abd Jvrkt 4hW & Au%st criffrf4 war
aut .rre4F eA fw At flow 4t* t' 4. f'*e A*t sedfieA revid ,
as<phna eMrA notwikin reeA41\ity oF melers.
cm<nvs nrto w '. s wr % 4 tons wihnt % e ru l dsh+y of
eteks
.
0
0
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4Jf/ 5'5*15 PAGE NO.: &'/P
.-
. _ _ - .
. - -
,
-
,3 %.
.
TECHNIAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Ta ble 3.3.3 - / PAGE NO.: 3[V 7'3l Thu 35
TS REQUIREMENT: R c.c. S Aeb fon Irishumankdon MepwM /
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:
TITLE: \
YES 11 0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? N4
Is installed system consistent with TSI <
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? A/A
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should A/A ,
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? #A \
\
REMARKS: FSAK co4anson no+ o.e ee m plashed sv <Astee k r ,.
Reneye! over m ew e nly.
I
,
iTATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
*
,
INSPECTOR (S): M C, 3 e nis lea-
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ _
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 85-75 PAGE NO.: A-49
l
" . - . .
- - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ________________________
_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ -
3 's
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Ta6/e. 3,3,3 -2 PAGE N0.: 41-M TWu Yo
TS REQUIREMENT: E ces n' _ PActue-hon 2nshamed wa h Se/pe/Ms l
l
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ISSUE DATE: REV.: ,
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v4
Is installed system consistent with TS? #4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? NA
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should NA
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? N4
+6e 'Ellow b %/ve" of tRe Tde
"
REMARKSG)'11 rip SefibinY and '
are shfed o n do-,I-l er In c orr Ac fle w newnsus useslse - '
a $ s d ed lis 0 ,
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
057 Teckarcal stedfica+ron cereckms reg ein d. as sfecifre A. CNR )
INSPECTOR (S): (4). 6 84 ,1T5ff e
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ___
YES N0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ TS- 3 f PAGE NO.: A -50
l
L- _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ )
/
' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: ~/ES/6 3,3.3- 2 PAGE NO : 3/Y 3-M 7#8u Yo
TRs P Sunchon$ hal Correelly slekd.'
A.I. C -
Valu es do no+ P ro ter l7 o l'e r l< P
A. }. S - Ttoo da deved r ssy e s
A.l h - % lurs do na+ prof erly overl
, a + n.o se n i, + vai i e b. ), C - Valu e5 do nd ProperIy ove<l4P _ . D I a (a+b- We ad Trit {oleen c e)Is Alluable velue corved b. I . b (ash - Valu es do no & Prote*lY overl"/,'Fr'e 7ler"e- b.1, n. (ak < Q-$2 304T2 " Tr;tj sQ values da n her/<p INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8f-3f PAGE NO.: A-S( ' . 5 k TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET - -. 4 3.'3.1-/ PAGE NO.: TS PARA: * TS REQUIREMENT: ECC S Adu a /ron Sur veu ll e n c e. Regeire m e nf.s Gena ra i SMeme.ds and Comme ds ~ REV.: % LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ~ ISSUE DATE: TITLE: YES NO Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 1 is installed system consistent with TS? k Are there any problems with the TS (factual or \ See Zndevodual editorial)? y - 7yo's Fu n eho r1 e Does procedure carry out TS requirement? g,,/s n, A,e/f "" ' M '# Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should work as written? Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? f4e REMARKS: din general "Cannnel Funchonal kf frefue.ncy is n e f- i n Proc edu re s .' L ette r de fed 2-2s'.gs by Licensee sfwled aY . sloe /d be ea(ded, ' ' @ Table un vo /ve s 74- STP n of ashneh this review inds'eeles , , ,u ,4, 4D s<+ s foeferv.18 hwe sirnoficed hebbm s a nd /G etre n,,t. found h O Oniv / sThhadbeen Welked dosun hv /seensee ad H wa s ' STATUS OF ITEM / ---OPEN-- , dEOSEB ' gM*['h*[[[[,884M/ TYe# Fu ne.froM A. /. 4. e , FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ~ 71 o'no Pu ne he n Pro c e du rl Re view , A/A ' See andsvadue / / INSPECTOR (S): LJ. C . hn < sle r FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ _ YES tLO Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
! STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: 4 - 5 A-
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-35
.
.-
r
, a.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: 4- 33. l-l PAGE NO.: 3/y 3-VI
*
TS REQUIREMENT: ECC S Acleahon Sur veill < n c e Repirem e.nf.s
Tn n e Funere d A. I. 4
STP-051- 42 2 2. ,/W 2 2.4
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? -
7
,
Is installed system consistent with TS?
4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
e
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: STP-OS/- 4.t a] l A mark,/ up corv o f R.g. s,o n o was
Prov.ded bv Lucan saa. A padua l' welledn (d.d e.t u ne &de
f%ra 7.2 hhas PevSor=ssed by insneckew te tollu nf th eda Nne /
C.o os m e,ds : See a%4d sbeek .
'
sTP -ort- en u we.s ed revu e<oed a n d.%' t .
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WH Y WHEN? '
0 55' %mY' ywadore as syec/Ned
INSPECTOR (S): kl. C . ~ba.nisle t-
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4S8/ fi-3_f _
PAGE NO.: A-53
m
l .
, .-i
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
J /y 3 -Y/
TS PARA: 4.3.3.I-l PAGE NO.:
Defes/ Rev<ewlu/atkdaur,
rrap F~u n e+ta n A .l. q . S YP OSI- 4-2zt
asa/kdouin 3of We rergiied 4
I) PAM ll . O - F*o r /$t insfeefors
/ o4 +Ge 3 re c or,, m e.u dea' /esfeguo/~td
fe s / egui/menf a n <l
jue ye ero f avaala 6/e.
2.) Pm 7. l. I Pferke d uP revs se o n ha d de/e/cd Me
Tks's
fo re co e d fim e. of Procsdu re s f a r-+.
l'egeire.me.n+ '
b
Ofe re hon t C * n d'W4 d
tuo a // be, a.cceph.ble t'F YeMelot th
4 er Y bu+ IS in Co nda fr o n I, 2 or- 3
'
/de yeef
spec,C'e ae/t o n s'f c4a,ne/ es o n
Spec Y ef er'v e.s
Ne m a. ,vo<< rs ,
of se r vi c. e frecke
,
Spees Vy Room /cabi,*/ whe,.e Ce4 />a/ron /4,,,y
.7) para 7. I . I 3
is lo co fed.
"
rfp,e
Ah P a rt 7. 3.'R A+ berinni-r of sMemen4 a.D
18 mon +4 Calo b ra h o n was />s e fo r ns ed, ver, p S. -
3) Para -),g -
? 0? '" Ys 'I!b *b " "'* * " * ' * *I#'d * #"'M)
Only } fat Paa of f4e Procadure for at day Channe /
Fun c+to n el Tes+ uses re v se u> od .
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45V/ Pf- U PAGE NO.: 4-5Y
.
/
j
, r
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
4 3.3.1-] , PAGE N0.: J/y 3-Vi
TS PARA: '
TS REQUIREMENT:
Ecc5 Ae/ , /ron Surve,// *n e e Referre m enf.5
Ta n e Funerm xt: A. I. b
STP ~ 031 - 42 GS/ Ha &>&
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES tQ
v
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
V
Is installed system consistent with TS?
4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? -
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should F[g
work as writt n?
L-
Has licensee ccmpleted procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
._
_
-m
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
F04 "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): U. C . ~bctnisle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ i
* YES t[0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 35-31 PAGE N0.: A- 55
,
-- -
, >
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 43.3.1-l PAGE NO.: M 3 -T I '
Rare, rem enf.s
TS REQUIREMENT: ECC S Aeleahon Su r veo ll < n c e _
Tn n e Fune.rw e: A . I. c
**'~ 420/
SrP -
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES .t@
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #/P
is installed system consistent with TS? e
u
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
e-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //4
work as written? 3
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V (M
REMARKS: (ah lnc ensee htd fev&rnoed wdNdown bei Revisio N fed
t'evo ew e d .
'.nef been trocessed fo r In co r dera ble*1 th Cof,v
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN (Cl.0 SED)
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): U.C.~3anfsler
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_
YES t@
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A -T G,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-JJ
i
-
.J
_
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ._
7_
.
>
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4- 3.3, l- / PAGE NO.: 3/v 3-W *
TS REQUIREMENT: Ecc s Aelua /ron Surveull<nce Raguirem ent.s
Tn n e Funerw W: A . I. d
S 71 - oS / - 4-2 47 /q z 4 9
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES _f,10
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does, procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? Y
REMARKS: PyoceJure.s nJ i ss u ,, s'
q_
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHA BY WHEN?
051 Lhnue must luat opro *LA ad sve{ked dswn ywsedever.
INSPECTOR (S): kl. C . ~2knisle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ~
YES _tQ
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/ 15-2.5
PAGE N0.: A-57
. >
.
i >
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: /-t 3.3.1_I PAGE NO.: 3h I *// *
Revoire m enf.s
TS REQUIREMENT: JEccs Aeluahon Su r veu ll < n c e.
The Func. rwa: A . I . e.
ST P 0 51 - 4 2 47/42 4 9
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //A
is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? Y
REMARKS: ST/s nef I ssued
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
Obd Idithyt MusY G.svt ets,1Ytwc) ecos) tyglbed dswo, ppse)Nrts
INSPECTOR (S): U. C . ~3 ctn i sle. r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95-31
PAGE N0.: 4-S/
I
'
,
g
, .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
43.3.1-1 PAGE NO.: 3/V 3-Y/
TS PARA: *
TS REQUIREMENT:
Ecc5 Ac/,,han Surve,// *n e e. Renf re m e nf.5
Yn n e Funerro u : A.I.f
STP - 2C)4 - 1200/130o
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: *
YES g
is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
7
Is installed system consistent with TS?
A'
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? V
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
V
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
'
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? A-
REMARKS: s TP- 20Y-I2co
n .* , ss u ed
STP- 204 - t 300 . Rev o as anohe$f IIweed lacked aceekee
Crolerar a,sd had many "l,q{er.$ .
wes wethed oo'se
STP- 2Oli- I 300_ Re v.1. Provahd on s-I-US,
-
'
ad s.,d anaceaAMe; sea a&Hde/a,%.
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT_ BY WHEN?
CLOSED
CGl l} L/eteset Avsi' Ot*t k u > 44l$ted dw s wer & '
09 1) Liteasn. Most s%corsiEk. r%vL-n r "
C43 S) LItemt mn$ Lorr**b 1*we d"!s
INSPECTOR (S): _Qf. . hnisYe r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ _ _ _ _ ,
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A - 59
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ? T-1.f
..
,/ .
? .
'
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 4. 33. /- / PAGE N0.: 3/V 3 8//
Tgoe fuaierien A.I f Ocnb'*"*d
5'pe e,' f e pro ble m w, fd S TP - Zoll - 1300, Revi non ) a re
regui re d era,p m e n / suc4 a s .r ~ te r leads,
b No# all
Co m mu n n e* l ion exur'/ ment a nd Removed Ep sos,ed 5y3
wes e. srecifred , n S ee l,o n 4 .
A frc~Yejus $slf3($edten b) incfylecl hi// yEa Se[eby Sysles.<
b rea ker and raclfiny sl od be.&re
'
SheP/ Supervi.sor,
.
C,on fro l Cpera l ton.s fo r e ma n a.s d Nuc feo y Conho/Oforekr
ay c. n olo' 0ed o'f $ro ee du re beany v.,,s/es.1enle/{See/ron Ph.
3} 1,oce lro n of Reky (G)2-870 A need.s /c be. ntors.
spec, facayll idennGed s.nce more M'an one Bay com/r'ke s
manPfo2 7 (Slep ?.3./)
M '/cr~i'ils
n) Slep 7. t.I shouN S/"'6' on w h A har k are
a.re / sea /e.d( He relay. +LI kJ ke- re-oved).
MJ 5) Steps 7A.:t asa 7.o.3 si,,u// a/s de se<c!#c es -/, 44 7
ey ui/ me.d Me fer.nanals tefer t apply,
PAGE N0.: A - (,0
INSPECTIONREPORT50-4ff/Pf"33
1
1
l
11-y :'ON 30Vd ST S& /$.@-09 JH0d38 NOI133dSNI l
l
fWSh
P
788/f p?st. rag f a eo opy,o/D
,
r
rswh7h9) jaa sp>q {l
'a!?j c y 5 gj Jy s I j e *f*S
a'03lSS ?)/ *s t/a,t,9 ~9 Jke vles -% 4'l "*V'*S (of
-4*froJ$frorJaop u t-yna aj ; y, s y,2 pt oy*gZyatya3(b
ya,tc oS 'of},' ' 4eif *t ed yat72 ag def *y!VoMll1 af,'l
J / .
/
:l'E'6'l"*ynsQ3
.
I"y"'Pt e.g }} /) q 9 ; T C)
/
/ * (M QQ
k
J '*4 f"$ Aff'"*f3 Y /*k3 h0Al S*V2h5 W so,D SAcejg g
s,> o aav *e f?j**3 Gl sI 4 5@6 y2f'n)S *adayn} koj'W6iSaf
-
.
~
w 00.) ?ftjs 2YIfjnot)S * / *.8 */ * *f ' * S l.,
skraf 2h4(Su_T
* 54 0$$ oJa 4 jf Svotj?n.tj,54l
the o Sy
/y' *4 9)~) fVD A)ffk?f,1 hleadeJ$ Q_
Joy *A9/1 'f yn0]S$ f4D */f *SI/\ A)'f ** ^ .feu Sl $sjW Q
a+ ntouwyvajid i ~> wys" cy o ay_1.
. :sf oty *) L u -lnS (9
y n u p * > - g *1 w u . . p n g n u
//,- t A/ (, :*0N 3DVd
l
/*p'g'fr :VMVd S1
133HS NOI1V0NI1NO3 VIVO N011V313133dS 7V3 INH 331 ,
,
.
.
,
.
. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 D.1-/ PAGE NO.: J/v 3-w '
TS REQUIREMENT: _ Ecc S Ac/n,han Survee // e n e e. Reywre m enf.s
A. I, 9
Tnne Funerw o:
STP 2Ol4~ 4203
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES tjo
Is t,here any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? _
##
v
Is installed system consistent with TS?
-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
u
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should y/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
VN
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
INSPECTOR (S): _ L/. C . hniske
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES_ g
Were problems c.orrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
l
'
INSPECTOR (S):
l
'
PAGE NO.: 4 -(, A
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pf-If
l
-__-______________-_-___-______---______.____________-_-_-_____________-________---_--.__)
-
. *
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 3.3./- / PAGE NO.: J/y3-Yj *
TS REQUIREMENT: _ ECC S Ac/e n /ran SurVee // *n e e
RerwreMEn85
Tnne Funerw o : A.I.h
STP - 20 T - Jaco,/> s o o
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? $
Is installed system consistent with TS? fy4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or gg
editorial)?
V
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #[jf
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
/
REMARKS: ST P - 207- f 200 hef i s s te r /
-8300 har k sny "l,elees sol no < cart /m.,ee (vokerk
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
OG4
t) LIcta tte Meli' t'stut affrWed, de) dwet $fttaedug '
' '
Oss $ Liteau most innpd k " L kTen s "
INSPECTOR (S): _ kJ. C . "Zhnisle.r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
l REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
A-(, 3
,
PAGE NO.:
INSPECTION REPORT 50-450/ 75- 3J
- - ,
---
. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: _d: 33.1-]
PAGE NO.: 7/V J '// '
TS REQUIREMENT: ECCS Acle s /ron Su r ves tl < n c e Rareirem ents
Tn n e Funerw 2 : A l. L
STP - 2 0S ~ O Go l
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:
TITLE:
YES g
is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Q
is installed system consistent with TS? #/4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or r/4
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #[4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: S t- P hof assue d
~
_
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
osc.
-
12tenw mn+ ikpe upmh welkd Jn t greed.i.i.
INSPECTOR (S): _U.C.~2knis/er
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ '
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified 7
OPEil CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: 4-C.y
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95-3J
l
-____ -_ _ ____- ___ __ - __ _ _
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 33.1-/ PAGE NO.: J/Y J-Y/ *
TS REQUIREMENT: Ecc S Ae/u 4,n Surve,// en e e Ren,re m e.n85
The Funerwd.' A . 3. o
STP ~ ost -tag 2/n a q
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC.' PROCEDURE N0.:
TITLE: '
YES g
is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //4
"
1s installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or e-
editorial)?
-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should _ (4
work as written?
v
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN kOSD)
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
U. C . ~ ban e sle t-
_
INSPECTOR (S):
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ _
YES g
!
Wers. problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A-GS
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7.5-3r
u _
>
_____ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
s
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4:.D./-/ PAGE NO.: 3/r J W/ '
TS REQUIREMENT: Ecc S Aelaahon Survee ll e n e s Kapin m enf.s
_Tn n e Fu nene d ; A.9 b
STP ~ OSI- 43 Gr/u 2G G
ISSUE DATE: REY.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES Q
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //g
y
is installed system consistent with TS7
-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
V
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should p
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? v
REMARKS:
STATUS Of ITEM OPEN CLOSED)
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
INSPECTOR (S): kl. C . "Dqnt s /e r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ,
YES y
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS Of ITEM
l
REMARKS:
!
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A-66
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ #f- H
l
__ - _ _ . _ _ . - - _ . _ . . _ _ _
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PAGE NO.: 3/4 3 -Yf
TS PARA: M 3./-/ *
TS REQUIREMENT: Ecc 5 Aelu dron Su r vee ll e n c e R a p ire m e n f.S _
Yn n e Funerre 2 : A . 3. C
,DT{ - OSI- 433 9
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES g
is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #g
15 installed system consistent with TS? ya
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or g
editorial)?
V
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should P/g
work as written?
v
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: S78 W o/- / 3 54 ed
i
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
1
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
%? LIltMtL As4V_ Is$vt y f r0 V thy M 4 N b es:*s f j e d d vtj
i
i INSPECTOR (S): _U.C."Zhtniske
i
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,_ _
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
_
*
_
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A -C_7
INSPECTION REPOR7 50-458/ F S-3f___
. - _ _ . _ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M,3. f r_/ PAGE NO.: 343-4 *
TS REQUIREMENT: acc 3 AJ.,han Surva, // e.,e e Renire nt e.nf3
Yn n e Func.roo At ,* A.3.0
67'P- OSI- 4.12 b
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
Y ES_ g
is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 F//t
is installed system consistent with TS7 e _
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or v
editorial)?
V
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should ///9
work as written?
L-
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMAFxS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN QSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7 .
INSPECTOR (S): _kl. C . h n k r-
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ TS-35"
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ff '3 L
PAGE NO.: A-4/
f
i
r
.
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PAGE NO.: My 7-w
TS PARA: M ,3,1-)
EccS Ae/u han Surveell e n c e
Ren, rem ands _'
TS REQUIREMENT:
TAIP Fumene v 4 .2. e-
S TP - 3.05 - 49 0 +'/W toS*
ISSUE DATE: REY.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO,:
TITLE: '
YES tLO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? N/A
15 installed system consistent with 757 c
v
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? -
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should ///t
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
Vh
REMARKS: 5 7P - 9 07 ~ '4 9 0 5 . f tr A l. l > SId*S a Hines ble lo fr.4 spre
_&L3.l-l. A .L. e
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS" WHO MUST 00 WHAT_BY WHEN7 '
069 Cpyte+-mde?e as u te? bed. '
W
.
INSPECTOR (S): _kl. C . ' ban nle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES tLO
.
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems idontiffed?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-35 PAGE NO.: _/)-6 7 _
-
. _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
s *
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
3/y 1-W
TS PARA: 4: D.l-/ PAGE NO.:
*
TS REQUIREMENT: _ rcc S Ae/u 4,n Survee // e., e e Kapire => e.eids ,
. Tn n e Funeroe 2: A. 3. f
STP-Rost.422llut.12 REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ISSUE DATE:
TITLE: '
YES NO
is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //A
-
15 installed system consistent with TS?
d-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? -
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Coes the procedure walkdown indicate that it should FA
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? WQ
REMARKS:
__
--
OPEN Oi nTrD
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7 .
:
INSPECTOR (S): = U. C . ~bannk r
.. -
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 1@
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN - CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARXS: ,
'
INSPECTOR (S):
JNSPECTIONREPORT$0458/___85-J/_
PAGE NO.: _A-70
l
- - - - _ - _ - __ _ _ _ . _
_ _ _ _
. o
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
4: 3'3.1 -l PAGE NO.: J/r 3-W
TS PARA: '
TS REQUIREMENT:
Kcc 5 Ae/n,han Surve,// en e e Reywre m e nf.3 _
_ Tit g r Ru ne.no 4/ .' A. 3 9
_;5TP 20 2 ~ o lool
ISSVE DATE: REY.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: *
YES g
is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 #//F
15 installed system consistent with TS7 /
V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? 7
Does, procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should Aff4,
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? v
REMARKS:@AA spec sfe/e>
C44 .,n/ G8/re dan is NA bste
IK Me--Cs . _7'kis reAure e re sela /ro n .
.YCf41101 coNeds ledfre
,
@ . Sne. ._ bsYl'
.
te&down .
.
STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO Mu!7 00 WHAT BY WHEN7
CLOSED
hD_ lAt.inet M*L?tt#IVt - MEOkECI$ f Con fh~< f
_
061
090 f Lius. gen.af corres'/ _urut& dows a f H vee? N 't )
W
INSPECTOR (S): y. C . ~banisle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A ') {_
INSPECTIONREPORT50-458/JJ-U
a -_ _ i
_ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ______ _ _ ____ ___ . _ -
.
e
. ,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET _
i
TS PARA:
4. 3,3 , l - / PAGE NO.: Jk 3 4//
$1~P 20 z oc, o l
TWnP P u.M c. TterAs A . 2 f --
I ,$ T P ulat k d au n n6 kid provadeJ (de 9, //,w ,, , '
eJ:/orh/,
and m ino r- erro r s,
cla r e fi c a /"
9, Sec.hton Y.5 Shou /cl SPect[y frotedura to be se se'cl for fd'e
Sut/r ession Pao / c oo /<*f. -
3. Se.edron 7.6 - stuoG mnat aokere. shi prassare , ,2/ =. 'L-
*
Astd poo{ -le m pera b'e r e a.ra lo ca/ed,
Ntare 4 neemAnes A n e J e e n c A e n pral o or
4. S ulr on 7. 7 + 7. 8 -
p,,,t ans sri n ees., c 4 ~ tiy..
.Delele " D w z p ,,,, ,1, j/o ,
5* sexlien 1.//
l>. saclion 7.1z. - Ala r m nar se e s fa./d la in Al/ ca/s ,
7. Se</tvn 7.12 a4 l arm name SLda/ be on *// cat.s
R, Sedeon 7.21 - Add nam c. of l 1 4 /s f be &servad.
~7. 2/,7.1 Slalus l,9bls a.re. no f
_e. S'eedro n s 7.21.1. 2. -
e n ds e < /ed < *, f re cedu re (s eeJo es ps +A) ,
la.be le d as
3 'u'Y'A
lo, Salton 7. 22.~ stecofk Panel }v /oce/e swoM and ll*t t
na sn e e n all costs,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45$'/ II'3f PAGE NO.: 4 -7A
.
___.___.___._________-__________m
-
/ .
. ,
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
.
4 3.3. / - / PAGE N0.: Jd 3 -y/
TS PARA:
s Y p - 2 0 2 - oino j
TMP Fet ve.YooN 4 2.y
11.
Seedrons 7.23 71% 7.33s'72, - itse all cass for-
Swob4 Asd *E*m n A me-s N
.
" "
13 Secl'on 7.29 - belelc Dtv E
0, S ee.h a n 7. 3.2 - Shen fy sl*ho ltikf Colot-
,
/ 4, Sechans 7 3/ 732 - Corrae./ srP [b Na/c4 ac dte / *
.
a. belong of lsykfs,
..
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4ff/ P J 'If PAGE NO.: d-7)
.
L
- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .- _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'
TS PARA: M,~5,1- / PAGE NO.: 3/t JWA '
TS REQUIREMENT: _ rccs Ae!. 4,o Suvee // en e e Rapireme.nf.s
_Tage Funera At: B . l . a.
_379-05/- 4333/4337 REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ISSUE DATE:
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? _ /4 /
15 installed system consistent with TS? r i
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or n
editorial)?
'-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should N/4
work as written?
#
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? __
REMARKS:
!
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN hl0 SED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT 8Y WHEN7 .
+ 1
l
INSPECTOR (S): _L/._C . ~bannk e
l
F0l.LOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (5):
PAGE NO.: 4 - 75/
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_P5 #
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ _ - _ _ . _
_ _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
o
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
t
75 PARA: _4: D. l-l PAGE NO.: ) [4 3 tA '
,
TS REQUIREMENT:
arcc s A/. 4,n Se ve, # .. . . b,m,,m e nf3
Y n w F u n e. r m a : B,I b
STP 05l~ 42 to ? /v 2 fu t
ISSVE DATE: REY.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO :
,.
TITLE: __ *
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 Af4
>
15 installed system consistent with 757
*-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M/A
work as written?
V
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? _
REMARKSt
:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN C LOSE D
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT_ BY WHEN7 .
INSPECTOR (S): y. C . " ban / sisl e
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50 458/ _ ___
YES g
Were problems corr'cted?
e
Were any other problems identiffed?
OPEN CLOSED
SfAf05 0F ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
l INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/; FJ-/f- PAGE NO.: A' 7I
.
!
_ . _ _ _ _ .
. _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,
PAGE NO.: 1/y PYA
TS PARA: M'3. l-l '
TS REQUIREMENT:
Ecc S Adn,han Suevee // e n e e. Repire m e nf.3
_Ig n e Fu ne.rw W .' B. l. C
_kTP ~ OSI ~ UK1 i
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? F/4 l
15 thstalled system consistent with TS? _._ v/4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or _ NA
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #fA
work as written?
-
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: _ S TA
_
ne f as5er/
.
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT_ BY WHEN? '
'
01l U LAJ O W Y tsive k{2Wth WdhY bwL(Jh*V _
INSPECTOR (S): y. C . hnisk e
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50 458/_ _ _
YES g
were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF JTEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A ;6__
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ 7 5 -35
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ - _ _ _ _
.
.
m
,
~ '
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
-
TS PARA: ,4 3.'3.1-l _ PAGE N0.: $/V 3-Y).
'
TS REQUIREMENT: Ecc 5 Ach e /,o n SurVes // en e e- Reru,re m enf.5
Taw Fune. rwa; R. I. d
S pp - Roy - /20t //30 /
~ '
,
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE:
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/A
l 1
is installed system consistent with TS? ^/'A
f
'
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or _ , , $f
editorial)?
- Does procedure carry out TS re'quirement? , [
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should F/A l
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?' V'
REMARKS:h7A - 204- /2.0/ he[ rSSWe/
"t-e/ers accepGneeCrokrig -,
\
I
&- - 13 0 / hes n,a n v
'
a.>, d na
,hTAT'USOFITEM h CLOSED
.
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
@ liktatee A *N E.sG!f Affr Y .44M Y ldwis enr$wt
~
,
0 ?) '
07.I 0 L41eniee ntJ.N l'n Covh$1 YTEJLt '
l
INSPECTOR (S): LJ. C . hn t sle.r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/,
!
- YES @
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? __
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 85 .IJ PAGE NO.: - A-7)
\
. . ,
^^ - ^
_ _ . _ _
.
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4- D,1-l PAGE NO.: Mt 3 -9 '
TS REQUIREMENT: Ecc 5 Aelu a lion Surveull en e e Rareire m e.nts
TRIP Funcno v: B./,6
SO - 204 - 410 9,/e+s.i o
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //
/}
e
Is i'nstalled system consistent with TS?
-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
6-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should 84
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V[M
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN hLOSD
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): b).C.~1hnis}ey
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ '
YES tQ
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A -7 2
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS- SJ
. >
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PAGE NO.: - J/y J-YA
TS PARA: 4 3.'3./-/ '
TS REQUIREMENT: ECc 5 Aeluahon Surveuilence Reguire m e nf.s
Tsup Funerm2; B.l.f
ST*P - blo 4 - l3,0 ? /t30 2-
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE:
YES N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? N//)
Is installed system consistent with TS? v/A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 8[g
editorial)? e-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #[4
work as written?
4-
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? *
REMARKS: S TP - 2Dt/ ~ I.20 3- n o f s.Su e d
i
~OOA has me.n,v l.olc? ar<l no $c.ce/lAnc e [ro/creg
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? '
0?4 h lit test c he asf n fue ksyndtJ, % l Nan / hw n M edun '
'
015 $) Uteme muc f tw do"n.it * LkTM s "
INSPECTOR (S): h).C.~bantsler
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES tj0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE N0.: 4 ~ 71
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_PS .lf
~
)
-
E
}
l
'
-
. l
!
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PAGE NO.: J/Y 3 'IA l
TS PARA: 4- 3.3.1- / *
'
TS REQUIREMENT: Ecc 5 Acle a lio n Surves Il < n e e. Reguireon enf.s
TRue Func.rw W 6 l.R
S pp ,;204 - 060 /
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? F/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? v/F
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or N/'4
editorial)? 7
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should F[/} _
work as written? "
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: .$ 7-P mf i SSN e l
STATUS OF ITEM k~b CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
09h thinStt han+ isn/t ds,srove), na{h d k M (Ned/k
INSPECTOR (S): h). C . hru sle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ __
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMA8KS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ M .if
PAGE NO.: A-Po
c _,
.
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4- 3.3,1- / PAGE NO.: 3 /t J-yA
*
TS REQUIREMENT: Ecc 5 Aeluahon S u veo ll < n c e Repiireon enf.s
Ta u e Funerco u: .8. 2 a.
STP- OS I - 4 2 9-3,/v12-S~
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC.' PROCEDURE NO. :
TITLE:
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //4
-
Is installed system consistent with TS?
u
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
v
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M/4
work as written?
V
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN QLOSET)
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): W. C . ~2kn f sle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES _No
were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PJ-3f PAGE NO.: A-f/
~ ~
-
.
. 1
. . . . . _ . . . . . _ .
. +
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
3/y 1-YA
TS PARA: 4-33.1-l _ PAGE NO.:
*
TS REQUIREMENT: Ecc 5 Ac/nehan SurVee // en e e Refu, rem enf.s
. Tn n e Fune.ne c: B.2.b
STh - 05/- 42 0 7bu g
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 84
-
Is installed system consistent with TS?
-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should F[/
work as written? "
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
,
,
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): h). C . hnisle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?-
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75~U
PAGE NO.: d-il
,
_ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ - _
.. - .- _. _ -_.
-
. - - - .
. -
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 D.l-/ PAGE NO.: 3/V 3-YA '
TS REQUIREMENT: Ecc s Aelua hon Surves/l<nce Reyerrem ents
Taue Funerw&; B , 2 . sc
3 rp - 05/ ~ 4-2 7 9
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE:
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 84
Is installed system consistent with TS? 7A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /*g'
editorial)?
V
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should [/[
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? v
REMARKS: 37- P ne f is S W r d'
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? *
o 2') Le%erree a er1- Tswe <r,1rwd, wakd Jn n ptvadore ,
INSPECTOR (S): kl. C . ~ber.n isle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75 .7f
PAGE NO.: A-93
. ._
_
j
._ - . . -. -. ._.. .- _ __ ._- _.
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4- 3.3, l- / PAGE NO.: 3 /f 3-b *
TS REQUIREMENT: E CC 5 Ac/n n /ran SurVes // en e e Raref rem enf.5
Tner Funerwy* B. 2, d
_ p rp - 0 5 / t+ 2 2 7
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /[4
v
Is installed system consistent with TS?
v
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
r
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should ![A
work as written?
7
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REPARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN dLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): kJ.C. h ,,, der
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
'Were any other problems-identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 15 -If
PAGE N0.: A -9Y
-. _ _- _
.
>
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4- 3.3.1-1 PAGE N0.: 1/Y 7 -*/ A
*
TS REQUIREMENT: ECc s Aclea hon Sur veull en c e Repiresn e.nf.s
Ta s e Fuucr<c,4/ t B. 2. E
STP -204 - 4213/14,l27/2 k
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:
TITLE:
YES tJ(0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #/4
u-
Is installed system consistent with TS?
u
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? u
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does*the procedure walkdown indicate that it should h
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? id
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN LOSEh
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
.
INSPECTOR (S): h).C.~1knisler
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES tQ
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ II- 5/
PAGE N0.: h-f T
-
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4- D. /- / PAGE NO.: 3/Y FY4 '
TS REQUIREMENT:
E CC 5 Ac/=,han SurVee // en c e. Regwrem enf.$
Tase-Funerw a: B.D. F
STP - Goa - O G O 3
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE:
YES t@
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? 5/
/'4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /Vgh
editorial)?
/-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #/4
work as written?
V
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: ST/ n o f */ S S We cl
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
0?$ h'linw snasf I5sW Ay,m v{ke] hwn ,orn thk
.
INSPECTOR (S): kJ. C . hn isie t-
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 110
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE N0.: A - 8 /o
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ IS-73
. - . - .
-
,
. . .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4- 3.3, l-l PAGE N0.: 3/43-YJ *
TS REQUIRENENT: ECC 5 Ac/u Son SurVes // *n e e Rerwrem enf.5
Tn n e Funerw AJ : C./*Q
STP - 05/ - 49. 39/33/3y/3S' ,
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: *
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M4
Is installed system consistent with TS? u
e. -
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
V
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should fj4
work as written?
M
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): U. C . ~ ban f sle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ -tT
YES tj0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ #5- #
PAGE NO.: 4-7'/
.
L-
-_
-
.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4- 3,'3. l-l PAGE NO.: Jk / ~PJ *
ECC S Ach a hon Su, ves tl e n c e. Rare, rem e.nf.s
TS REQUIREMENT:
Ynne Funerw 2: C . l. b
S YP - 05/ -4253 /se/SS/S-G
'
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC.PROCEDUREN0$:
TITLE: '
YES @
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //4
Is installed system consistent with TS? t-
4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should ///)
work as written? '
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN @0 SEQ
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7 .
INSPECTOR (S): kl. C . hn isle t-
-
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ,
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ PS 3f
PAGE NO.: 4-i?
j
l
l
.
L_
_ _
.
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PAGE NO.: J/y7-YJ
TS PARA: 4 3.3.1- / *
TS REQUIREMENT: ECc s Aelua /ron Surveo ll < n c e keyri, rem e.nf.s
Tn n e Funerio u ; C./.t
S TP ~ 05/ - 4332./3 y ,
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE:
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ^[4
-
is installed system consistent with TS?
e-
Are ,there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? "
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should YA
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN LOSE]
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): kl. C . ~banis}e y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ _
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pi-U
PAGE NO.: A-Pi
_ l
-
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
_ PAGE NO.: 3/y 3 -Y3
TS PARA: 4: 3.'3.1- / '
TS REQUIREMENT: ECc s Ardua hon Surveull<nce Reye, rem enf.s
TR n r Funerw c: C . /. d
STD~ N ~ Molfo2 REV.:
;
ISSUE DATE:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? @4
Is installed system consistent with TS? Ff4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or #[4
editorial)? 4-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should ![1
/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? 7(8L)
REMARKS: '23c M .STPs have lco m a n,v l.aNrs /o Je. m ueryk/.
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR l'0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? *
O77 LiteAste nwsf inevporaf< MThtr *
INSPECTOR (S): LJ. C . hn f sle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ _
YES @
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE N0.: 4 -*10
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5 - 35
i
,
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PAGE NO.: S/y 1 '(3
TS PARA: 4- 3.3.1- / *
ECC S Ae/e n han SurVe# // en c e Rerve re sn e n'[.5
TS REQUIREMENT:
Ta t e Funerre y : Q c.. l. e
S TP- 203 - 4-3 0 7/o8
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE:
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? M///
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or #4-
editorial)?
v
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M[/t
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? '
d<)
REMARKS: STP' f<ve foo Many 'Lekr and no Accephnee Gileria.
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM ( OPEN)
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CS0 huhesset #1sik n% W dW4h *LA h !
,
.NSPECTOR(S): L).C.~banfsler
e-
FutLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES tQ
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 1 5- 35
PAGE NO.: 4-1/
-
r
.
-
S j.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
4 33,1-/ PAGE NO.: Wy 3 -YJ
TS PARA: *
TS REQUIREMENT:
ECc 3 Aeluahon Su,veull<nce Reyer re m e.nts
Tn n e Funerw a; C.. l. f
STP - 2 03 - </2 go
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:
TITLE:
. NO
YES
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 84
-
Is installed system consistent with TS?
e
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
v
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /[4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? d)
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN (CLOS
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): h).C.~32nf3]ep-
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/,_
YES tQ
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 15 -)f
PAGE NO.: A'i A.
-
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PAGE N0.: J[y 7-YJ
TS PARA: 4-33.1-l *
TS REQUIREMENT: _ Ecc s Aelua hon Su r vee ll < n c e Reguire m e d.s
Tn n e Funerio d : C.I 9
BrP - 203 - 4103
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: "
YES 13
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? /'4
/
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
/-
/A
editorial)? "
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /ft
/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? "[9
idrs and 1, o acee/)%er Cyr /en'e
REMARKS: SN has No M anji
STATUS OF ITEM (OPEL) CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? '
OVf LEctnstC Mu1Y lreto rf den " LNT11t:"
INSPECTOR (S): kl.C.~2knisler
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PJ -3r
PAGE NO.: h-7 J i
1
l
_
.
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4- 3.3.1- / PAGE NO.: 3['( I-Y3
*
TS REQUIREMENT:
ECC5 Ac/= , /ro n Suv Vee // en c e Rereirem enf.5
Ta n e Funerw d: C. l. h
S TP ~ 2.03 - O GO /
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/A
o-
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or c
editorial)?
c-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? *
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #A
work as written?
V
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
sfafes uY esoff p seedm "i w h ee l, do e.s
REMARKS-Q S TP conse,/vs
floY et r sf - edu/orre A
shows NA Le /-
(5) Chartnel CalbraSion frett.i
- r
eeev
s
of TS
STP 3 4 o av s Y e r er r e ** e .< S of 18 m e ., H'.s .
,
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? '
di.1. D L5thlet M WS$ Correc.$ fwltAstvY
083 C3 litswet Mvh rvsulve be trodon+v ' f
cm fth f
INSPECTOR (S): Id. C . ~1hnis-le r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ _
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-3f
PAGE N0.: 4 iY
u . /
V
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4- 3.3. I- / PAGE NO.: s/V 7-Y3
'
TS REQUIREMENT:
Ecc 5 Ach, /ian Surve,// *n e e Rereirem "
e.nds
Ta n'e Fu nerw Ah D . I . a. /D l. b/ D. J. c.
S YP ~ 302 - /6 coa,t//1,/o 3.4, e,jb r
,
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //4
Is installed system consistent with TS? #/,7
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or //p
editorial)? v
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #/4
work as written? #
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: S ?~F,5 ase. Ao fu // , f 'b e/er" /o l e A e4 ,,, , G / ,
EN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WH BY WHEN7
C8Y
bitBMct ne s!s Y ' E M ts p or e d e " L MA s
INSPECTOR (S): h). C . ~ba.n t sle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
fES Q
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? .
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/__ 7 5- 1f
PAGE NO.: A *l f
f
t
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4. 3/4, / PAGE NO.:
ATuis -R PT Ae4ua4 ton b skmen+ahon s e.ve,'//a u ce. _
TS REQUIREMENT:
TRt P PuMc Twa * 4 3,4.1-/. l - STP- 05/~ 423 6/d 4 37/S2 03/92 cy
,
ly,'o FuNe.rtov: U.S.4./~l 2 --- s TP - 05/ - 4 2co9/41 Tol417 t,E u 2 7 2.
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 /
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or v
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
V
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
Sediens
REMARKS:@ STP-e51-4Mo9 has In com 9do'bllofv * bekeen
(o . G ca s, d A! . fe Laloan '7. / . This was nd corroeled on
Walk dorn n .
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
DU @ WLthKt narf- 50rreci ,/rno)vq
INSPECTOR (S): L/r , % n, c/p r-
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
.
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
.
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ _ 95-3f
PAGE NO.: k-9h
1
l
_ _ _ _ _ - - _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
-
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: /4,3, /J , R PAGE NO.: .)/v 3 -f3
TS REQUIREMENT: EnJ-of-Cw/e Mr Svsh Surve He e 4
TKn # Fue c rto n
4.3. ko 2. / -/, ( - STP -508 - 421s/92tt,/4 sty /q2t g
~434hl42 52/4tb3/4.2.49
' '
'
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /g4
Is installed system consistent with TS? v
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #fA
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? ./
REMARKS:
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): N,C., $antifu
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
' YES g
.
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSE0
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_T f .lf PAGE NO.: h-9 2
L
.-
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PAGE NO.: My J-SJ
TSPIRA: 4 3 AL. 1
RPT Svs /m Sueae,Ha.,ce
TS REQUIREMENT: End. OF-Cve/e
TWrp Vu Ale rion 4.3. 4. . l- l.1 - bTP -50 R H 3-l 9 /43 zo / 42 2 / /4L22.
- 4 2 +' AFAAX/4193?t/1W
ISSUE DATE: R EV.':
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M//f
Is installed system consistent with TS? P
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
/
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should F[A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
~
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S):
W,Cdentrkr
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
.
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FI'.U
PAGE N0.: 4df
L
_ _ _ .
;
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET S. r.tr
TS PARA: 4.3,El-/ PAGE NO.: J/V 3-58
RCIC 4s/em Ac/ue han ro.s/rua.ew/e/<,4
TS REQUIREMENT:
Ra r er re ose e ,4s - - "TYip F u n e hon : A '
S u r v e.Ilve ce
STP'-ost- l} 222l a an / 4 2 2 u/ az a r REV.:
ISSUE DATE:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? MA
'
is installed system consistent with TS? f
Z-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or _
editorial)?
'
V
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #[4
work as written?
V
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
Cor n W e. 4 3.3. /-/ TWp
REMARKS: STF ~ 05/~ 4 2 2 z. Se e Rem ee kt '
h ue h. n A.I.e.. fcat 11 unlutf A'S3
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
08(o I . LIltnitt M alth town warr)<kt asExtRek i
INSPECTOR (S): k/. C. "Ba n o sle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ~
YES NO
.
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: h '/1
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-3J
h_
. - -
-
,- .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET S. z rs'
TS PARA: 4, 3, F, /-/ PAGE NO.: J/Y 7-M
TS REQUIREMENT: RCIC Svshm Ac/ue hon .rnsfrumenfobos
~nin F << n c + tors : B^
5 arv s',llo ce Re s aire os, en /s
STP- O3l~ 423 I /4337 REV.:
ISSUE DATE:
_
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: *
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //4
' -
Is installed system consistent with TS?
P
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? -
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should N/'4
work as written? "
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
'
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN (CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): L). C. "Ba n < sle r
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/,,;
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
YES g.
.
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: h-/00
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ If-fl~
.
__
--
-_ ,
.
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET g. , , ,f-
TS PARA: 4.3,5 l-/ PAGE NO.: 3/V J-fP
RCIC Ss/em A,/ue han .I,.s/rumeav/e//an
TS REQUIREMENT:
Pe r ui re o., e.,
nip F u n e. 4 ton : c
S uru s.llo ce
STP- 20 9- 4 2od. / 42o s-
ISSUE DATE: REY.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: *
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ///1
'
Is installed system consistent with TS? v
v
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? v
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should vf'a
'
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? v
h u m e,- o u s " L e N v in els Any
REMARKS: Revo sio n O Ce> n f a s ne '
c.<ae<; e
Ac cada c a
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT_BY WHEN? '
097 LRensee mas + lstormeiraf t "L.kM r"
,
,
INSPECTOR (S): h). C. "B a n , sle r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ _
, YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO. : A-I d (
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PJ-35
.
-
_ _ _ . _
^__m . . . . . .
m
.
.- -
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET g.r.sr
TS PARA: 4, 3, F, /-/ PAGE NO.: J k 1 fF
RcIC Lsfem A,/ue /ren ra s hu me* /w /e.4
TS REQUIREMENT:
T> s*p F u n e. -l ton : D'
S u rv e. Ilh tt/ 42.
TS REQUIREMENT: 7NL ceWhnet- Asb BLoca tasrasmnw <Hweer .riteas ta tan 4
w WstJ W T ar7W
3 . 3. 4 ~ l SWAU. 86 696tMLL Ho1% W e nel fi % 477 ft f~
yy4' s4ALCMJ $l,We' /d 1Ni Nif SSW T Cot.yMN b$ TA8tf 3. 9. 6 - [ *
N /A ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO :
TITLE: M/4 '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? N/I
Is installed svstem consistent with TS? N/f
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? Mk
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #/g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? N/g
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN hlSED)
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUS'T 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): N.F f#IN
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES @
Were problems corrected? _
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S): '
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-35 PAGE NO.: 4-M */ ,
----
.
.
.. . . . . .
,
'
.
.
*
,
/ '
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: N.[a PAGE NO.: .I- 5 9, 3"lo3 @
TS REQUIREMENT: Ekd oc rwt in otoete nro nsms Aa east enApfts wit. ps bwcw- '
S r uro DretAsLL 2y T* /Mf,rwcf er r3! c&M L cract: w w s e. rc s r, M s
cAcisitA71od ors. M Thw oHA. wbman L GMQ&cris sipus t > 7;oLL 4.3.6 - ll""" N
REV.: ------
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.. ISSUE DATE: -
TITLE: G M S' A G ^' CoMAA FA~ T3
~ .
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 //4
'
Is installed system consistent with TS? -
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? -
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?_
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that.it should '[
work as written? \
Has licensite completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: GTf 000'coor bau nor A>pm1 % cwat ccHec
pryper? of T(.T T4cA 4.I.I*-I; f.A A l h* Y M 47
S Tf '1 Itt tl&AG/n4 'i>hl sCIAVE tLt. A sCL M&utREM &T, S U Sit- N*T
uA LVE) ow p1 7M Lic EAY4, Wh t{ L u ltE.
' ~
s
STATUS OF ITEM hlPEld
P CLOSED .
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
bio (1) Lrcutee atus+ hulemen+ ekus,el cirek rewfumes.h of '
I +ethnhal syeufor'AM
INSPECTOR (S): W 6' IM i 77/ -
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ._ ,
YES N_0
;
.
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
,
'
INSPECTOR (S):
IN5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 85- 5i PAGE N0.: N-LO f
- .
&
- _ _ . _ _ _ ______
_ _ _ _ . _ __--_________ _
.
.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: N.da PAGE NO.: 3 - 5 9 , 3 " /o3 ' fo Y
TS REQUIREMENT: EAc4 c)C TW ha otocre "tro sysms As rast cetAMu wit. M bww-
Sruts.> otet Act.s ay 7 *' N ef,r w cf */ rx c/W L c/M c c , w w / L T i 5 7~, Mb
cActsMTro,J ors. GrA T W o H A. co/brT1*p ! A falswhx.rts sppus e,J ptaLL g.3.Q-l. 3
'
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:sTP-SD3-4 SOS ISSUE DATE: (2[M'[PV REV.: O
TITLE: RMS- SovAcE RAM 4i MorWil (HAMEL 'C'ho wAL *116 S T
YES NO l
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 8 " l
Is installed system consistent with TS? t, -
-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 8,
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? t/
a " ##
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? d
s r/-so 3 - 4 583 7yot
REMARKS: 6tP- 643 -4605 ts fimc# To
S o 3 - +Se t,.YL t cGSM L,JALKEJ bec.J4 A g.t Egcf) r .S Tf- 5*c3 - H D3.
* W b!MT MU L, c4rc6 AS e Mt.cLe bW By t.rctant p/As Senets ra f ft.Acu,
recgoruss e.4 ma sw wo,a ac omem co-a ser- fahon vernmaw *s
mrw e.rrer. '!Nu "pttwC of TfM/E>TMrM Gand & t Ack of (MxrMm s rt14 .5 fg!,r,
STATUS OF ITEM M CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
Q4{ Q) Wit &t Ws uf f e errt'c f frmflM <S JffcW1Yl
,
INSPECTOR (S): tal. F JN t W
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
.
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
t
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ff .7f PAGE NO.: Ar-lO 6
- h
- - - - _ - _ -
.
. t
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3.de PAGE NO.: 3 - 5 9, 3 '/o3 'lo 'f
TS REQUIREMENT: EAc4 oc rst h6 otock nit sisms As issr: enA&tu . Malt. 16 hww-
Sruw cretAet.s 2y 7* /6derwc! er rx e&M L cNEcc, c-a~cnwAc. 7< sr, M3
cAc.r'e*n ea ors. c** Thw o' * A . ewb m as t L fnlevAx<ds s w d (d 7'AB LE k 3,(o - l,
'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:57f-9a-T62- ISSUE DATE: J/J-3 [#5 REV.: o
TITLE: Qob thyre 9eJ codT0sl. 54 sten - rhat teJEt s&T totaT mis 7: cH. cAtto.
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v
Is installed system consistent with TS? &-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or t-
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? [ '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /I.E
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: S*71- Soo - 426 2 /T h erede To Sr# - soo - f 2.So 7MisW
S W- G * a - <253,(!D flocuent bo Es por Alt FAL. re csvs.4 3[- sky
pararr97 >-* C At-16AAM TXtf ukr T SFTW!"T & 73,(./ *p/*t 4
7 3, (.7 Qo par SEfEAssci feocuvat To & T' 8. Fe n Tas p1 P!T192.
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
Q11- D lItentet Muth inleasen 9triado'dh rtofrtnscah of kcLartal sydRr.fs,j
'
' "
013 & Litsette onest correc+ proredert
INSPECTOR (S): l J F. sad (~/?t/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_,0
.
Were problems corrected?
Were any.Other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ # f-1f PAGE NO.: A -to 7
.
-
ma n
. ._
* *
, \
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3.d PAGE NO.: .I - S 9 , 3 -/o3 ' 4 Y
TS REQUIREMENT: EAc4 6 rw ha etax nr! strWS Aub IMSC CHAMLJ Mall 96 b wcW"
s ruro cretMLL Ay T * / k for w 'E */ TM c&M t- c/Mcc, w o4 L7<tv, M
CAcc's47w ors. Cox 'np of EA. wb r7wsS & fnledAKrlI swa M pau g.3.4 -I, E.$ s d.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO. :57f Fo3-Gof ISSUE DATE: ' ~2-[( C[F S REV.: O
TITLE: f M S ~ h M M # ' "7'd C N C "B ' M / # 4 T78 4 '
1
YES ?!0 !
Is there any. difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v
Is installed system consistent with TS? v
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
d[I
'
Does' the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
No
REMARKS: SM- s o)- Wf 11.rrmeM To C o.1 - F L c 3 7 Hee Y 3 el..
ficOLEuf Awh .
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN @LOS)
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7 .
INSPECTOR (S): Ld 6 SWI N
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
.
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ i f -3.f PAGE NO.: A-l0 P
Y
L
* *
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'
#
TS PARA: '/1.7,f-/.// PAGE NO.: 3/V 7-r/ f-j 7/y 3~M
TS REQUIREMENT:
Chows / dali$nE dov fy, E.s,.s % 64 ff ,
l
1/J d%1
r a
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:grp.or c/zyf ISSUE DATE: c/r/# REV.: O l
TITLE: fe,Eu L fad mf&JN L'A4$sk
(fw,,,fG/,kL'gyygg
"
I 'YES No i*A)
l
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 p N p,'f Jo p f
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? ,
l
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should {
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? g
REMARKS: 5T/_c//- @ fo t's fi f m 4r a sovet- m 'de 4 -
I 41 s k A Ert,,11 c lK $ s sallse,,c.
!
!
' !
STATUS OF ITEM IOPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
Oh!Ysures s ' Ebr t ' was / h n' evocado* L 6 koh
/ obr e c
& Aud k nk,d <id o A /LL,< 06.' '
-
rr
INSPECTOR (S): N/ A M '
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPEdTIONREPOR[50-458/ 2 i
YES NO
.
Were problems corrected? ,
, -
W3re any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
,
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ If-H PAGE NO.: k-/01
. _.
- . _ . .- - - - _ _ _ _ . .
._
. . . . . .
* '
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: L/, 7 7. 3'-[ . // PAGE NO.: 7/</-// M T/y 7 J-fy (Sg K gy,fy
(/ espe / C4(Ne d ' f. An , U / row,f % b' u y g y
'
TS REQUIREMENT: '
WL.,.a .bGiUw Aven
k .Vv- \
ISSUE DATE: REY.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:JT/-ci,-V.2fty$wer bwell $42{4Af4h Avet L" a c44 ,aj
TITLE: Accr5 d AlmoYo**Ns Yr ' '
'
Ca ft W ( (ges t REabA)
'
YES 'M
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
"
1rttrous 'E's kr3 (sds{s ) 9ma{ 6e ok pocac(w es Q '
QREMARKS: '
L Draca dwes driast'44 reveene<f A $4Aerov*d leka 'N ,
!
STP-G/~'h 1o e'r $ Tit m ae r T~p - or -qM9 ext *p fcfo r
,_
iR M S M- A F 2 D T
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? '
(b LT te M M uvt v5 Y t % e p it " G k T D ts "
095:*
_
c
INSPECTOR (S): M/ J-r Mf '
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
INSP[CTIONREPOR[50-458/2, -
' YES Q
f
l Were problems corrected? '
Were 'any other problems identifiec'?
OPEN CLOSED
l STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PS -U PAGE NO.: A ~ // o
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
,i
-
,
- . - , , - . - - - -
-- . - - - - .-,
_
"
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
v.u.r-i;g -
: .,y
TS PARA: I df PAGE NO.:
}/</ 7-P/ -/- 77 . 7Q J f y (/74A.
TS REQUIREMENT: p=d .4 kC o 4,x w.s. 'e el w ', L f _ l4 a. A . m 4 { 't. T. 7. r -
cdsenols sdd//he elw Lt.J CFEO$r' Q&serna. J- K r %Wh'CL C.ffEcfz
s.I ' CHAML/PL t'MiBAATfD#enL', af L Cu ac 'n erd a '. M/c a 2. 7. (- t ;
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: yrr..... 2.i ISSUE DATE: /A,//h REY.: o i
#
TITLE: /fr. w M/v / Lea 4 ; / or 3
t i i i .
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 2)Al#o/.Arper.f
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? f
.
Does the procedure walkdown. indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? y
REMARKS: Ta6/v f 1 7. c "'/
r
-/ (we 7/t/ 7+ Y l 75) /
//em ff- /6 a m
*1a s h A tl $ W S T C $ t v T M .noo tn n f.
t
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED p MQ .
,
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? p*~
'
u HenlI% hocek ves serae / 4-e %of ncI we.e J hw > T 5'
0% rai, as.g. 7. c-i , -t + . t ze~ic s+;x- oL.' _
INSPECTOR (S):G/.< D$:.,-
FOLLOWUP ACTIONI INSP[CTION REP 0 / 50-458/, - ~
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
-
Wereanyotherproblemsidenlified? 6
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pr- 75 PAGE NO.: A -lll
I
.
- ~ , ~ - - - , -
T
' *
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M T.7./0 ,
PAGE NO.: S/c/ 7-9 7 4 1/<.7 9-97(R//,<f,7,7,fo.4
TS REQUIREMENT: t a a:J h?se/ w n4 M J lar-f f.L> c WMr -we to, I
chw. I apLL
LIC. PROCEOURE N0.: JrP-n/-42a ISSUE DATE: 3 /29/w REV.: 0
'
TITLE: L ;L d X'alark Efflud / ' CAsuarl C6/;(ek ( rde r-reioy)
" '
YES N_0
DN A/of Argeef-
~
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should 7
/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: A % d N rec /1O ch f$ir dro cels n wt3 m e t-
'
dev$o rwcl.
/
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSE0
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
A rad *6veN was f 8+ inderw<a el n f$lc M. L u J%
'
ncE. adtE 't tQu ld r . ce f.$ vs dh a tO Fouvee r art nf onb. k
i
ube.r a %. 9% $~.ah la1 k 4MG /L_ lin'J #
cofinf4 m
INSPECTOR (S)[1d.e,A I 1//A / '
'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSP/bibN RElibRT 50-458/f
YES 0
N_0
Ware problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSE0
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
! INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ $f- 3 5 PAGE NO.: h-ll A.
I
_
ny. -- _ _
%
~
lOk; f / o
ggy ,; pg/,Y $1-' f (R Q W e~ W d ~ $ f f ]
k,
.\
.
J
l
. . , _ , _ _m,..-.crm
.
* *
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y< 3. 7. /O- /. / 4 ,
PAGE NO.: Sh 3 -fy' -/-. ~7/-( -)- f 7 (TF//c '/.'J. 7./4y
,
TS REQUIREMENT: 6c4 atlJ. un. I,n.!/ effluf % .% ' , ' ug- ~ 6L 4 g ,
i/a y L , ela ~ A . 4 e/ tWEM AEL 2du nSamn at M CAAr' M =L CffE' cq
ss *
F/2..//p-y REV.: o
LIC.IPROCEDURE NO.: S r# oco-ooet ISSUE DATE: ' '
l
TITLE: l '/v(O h C ' foer
/ / -
/ YES N_0,
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 7t/ A'e / ,fs,sm7'
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or i
editorial)? l
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? ' '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
H:s licensee completed procedure walkdown? 9
REMARKS: d YS < , L, ,, & r ._ s 7^P / J f ,ce k rrp-oe.-o.. t
a a fX'n a- a aL ~ C. cla- . , / c Arc k . L + c ,+ c ., - es e i rLes
'
s / { We _
STATUS OF ITEM GPED CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
M Tf lm a Cla ma ( rAec.k /va e e el < L ~ -/4, 'a den.
M8 veu,L & a d umd LLJe &. ( Literace uk) '
~
ff
INSPECTOR (S).@ A [n I W lo -
FOLLOWUP ACTIONkNSP/CTION 5 REPOR[50-458/pt' - ~^*'
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
'
' Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
*
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 85-U PAGE N0.: 4-ll 3
.I
_
_ ._. _ _ _ _ . -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ - _ _ . . ___ _ _ _ ._
1
u l
y
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
1
TS PARA: 4 , V. /. / PAGE NO.: -f/d #-/ l
TS REQUIREMENT: L) Xc.S ne < , A u 1 /y ,.- r 4 / ,g,/M
'
!
a A1// k Jr.eiv tAa AJ erwA & N n' } fn] s s; b>> -w74
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: sre-as 3-os,or ISSUE DATE: a h,/sv REV.: o
TITLE: Ai.lu , //w e nAdmb ,-e ._i n & $ _ % s /
'
# #
YES M
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
g
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? t- ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? t. -
REMARKS 0rld An/ i An.e 3 J4 A y 3,7 d v.3.9 _,, A i' d_fafn
>l A u A -- a An / Es s.1 AN /2 4/h xAs v. 3 , 4./ A n h,.s-
it l Arm delM w u L a 3 G-.S A E v. 1 1 i 7..T 9 a Y
</[Ai
'
i~2 * l h'Ava i/m> A-
'
i
+ d.
ci , r
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
Cc(q (O Lite <see rus+ coneef porel.irt
80 0
D Lhtnste surf re.solut 'pvocedure /+tek nie.a { ser:1fr%% conflid
INSPECTOR (S): / I n u I X I/< u fu
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8J-35 PAGE NO.: A -11 il
_
.
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 4: Y,lel PAGE N0.: 3/F '/ -/
@ ST f-0S3 ~ osol , Kev. 0 , gne Go F s a, and '1 of IQ,
5fets '7. 3, I.t an) 9 3.15 lnd la&er ce maxim ~, s % Ice
rafe is fo be calcel<kl. TecJn<Tcal srvafru% 't.YI.t.s
rey tres ver?ftcakn of as'ernt< consnl vsfue movemenf .
hablevan skke rule IS Alfferenf km averr4e sfreke
ru&c - STf does aof nene. r wi% 4edshst steafMk
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-7J PAGE NO.: d'Il5
. _ _ _ _ 4
s
.- ,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.TS PARA: 4/. L /. 2 PAGE N0.: J/v V-1
TS REQUIREMENT: /&l.O & d,a r o. ,;.4 s a c h // 4. / , . ./,. 4 w a sjes-
aa A w/ ,,J A-a e veed,G ar 5 e$ edd L m Isuv s's/ bs/ a,.eah us.s
kW$~7'M2Y21:0Y'~bDhETb2;W$'IEk! '
e'U".n*,!'WY25efsfd. cue
lT[. TNdEMfE 'if05DI[I[[l. 37e7 ism [ #DATE: / /o y /s.v REV.:
' '
o
TITLE: de f fumf e/Ma nhilv resr ' '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? //4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should v/g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN QOSh
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): /bzaA /us//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected? -
:
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
*
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: k-ll(p
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4M/ PS-35
1
,
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: //, //, /, 3 /
PAGE NO.: Jo z/-J
TS REQUIREMENT: liedi.e eafx lia., As,>
f/, w wi.,l/lt eL// Je von 6/,s. Je
w 'lI, ,u & &> :/r aJ /us/ u ee ,/sv A u n
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: sr/-ax,- oom ISSUE DATE: plzy /r,v REV.: a
'
TITLE: D /$d _/n t
d '
# Y -
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //4
Is installed system consistent with TS? #/4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or s'
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should F[g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN C LOSE D
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7 .
INSPECTOR (S): /b ,, [m /[b
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? .
-
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-3J PAGE NO.: k -/l 7
, ,
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: #, z/, /, 9 PAGE N0.: J /v g- 9'
TS REQUIREMENT: hr/, 7 m pr i M// d d w //w u f M // 4
d$ss) A At A$ Ajd ss ~ A mM '
- 1Afs ./s . A ~~/A k . '
LIC.PROCEDUREd0.: GrO/# -ooo / ISSUE DATE: /n/2 2/w REV.: a
TITLE: lb d i L Cis 2 Ju - a m s/s,._ Nh (3sT)
i i /, s
YES _N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Oh
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or j.
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: GM- ooo l nAd ,,a se'->>ss1x d w.
'
Art m A
'
rYwau hAwlm, Aax d s"Ala A Ass o/$D/$ suhink
J' . GMs>L J i m a Ardnu re b > ] bwwh:/ 2
db. '*s2J w/ A mL > > ,,- i u m,/.w-m -[$& crp-os3-o7ee,
711, srP nm A us /4 ' ne e/ db) .
STATUS OF ITEM (0
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
,- CLOSED
'
l LOl D [cerech frutejart (lnense e)
IDL & TKut ah, rwed s wallu) Javn sric
-
, ele tr GIterg<e }
INSPECTOR (S): [bue#- ;/1tJe
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES l@
i .
Were problems corrected?
l
l
Were any other problems identified?
I
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: d-fly
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 2 5-M
i
L_
e
'
O
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: t/.V.2.l./g.) PAGE NO.: 34/ #~6
TS REQUIREMENT: 7b aeay,//c uron /dr /3, eac4 fa/3/,/,.e/J /ve/pr 54#/c
ib,---e/rold /9&A s/w L
. r i
m b -oner sbN:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 5744 -vra/ ISSUE DATE: REV.: e;
TITLE:
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 2
Is installed system consistent with TS? ,
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
Nb
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? // '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? r
REMARKS: - Suewl/knN koe//cv( its/ Aia,/A/4 '
Or AG vt.e to
T
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
(0P$N /
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT-BY WHEN7
to) W Licraset et us + nsuc asunu)
*I /
uidkt) J+. rl> ccAere
E
INSPECTOR (S):
'
/ mu jdw
. /, / (/-)d J fin n >L
'
nfrl //ibr/-,b O
'
Ja ,L_ Adi hi,oJ:i1 A n , L1-, J L "
. i gi r p
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 3r/- a,-42 of ISSUE DATE: REV.: o
TITLE:
g
'
YES
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? t/
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or ,
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: s u ,. vs,// w fesuAta shr A tu s Al $d>t
#v <A w
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
kOPE
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT_SY- HEN?
IOf L.Titm et n v.sb I'ss st r11FevC). W4ktA hwn tWwb&
IhSPECTOR(S): [) aux j dz d
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected? -
Were any other problems identified?
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
' '
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5- 35 PAGE NO.: h-/M
_ ___________ ___
" '. .
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: %%2./.2.(A.). PAGE NO.: 3/u V-/,
h S rr - or/- 4 24 7 7
57,o- oc i- yza ( A /wa (h) J
, boedws asf
I/ {
5TP- 65/-4299 Bvd> Yak /s e t?wM
.
.
i
l
l
!
.
'
!
l
l
.
i
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ I T-15 PAGE N0.: A 'lH
l
. - - _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ - . -_
'
. .,
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4. V . 2. /. 2. h) PAGE N0.: My
_ //-4
TS RE UIREMENT: 7/,meh/d x M d w o,L A A dw, 4A
- $11 b, Lfd , , u ,/ m - a e_ d, e._
'
' // )v A-~- -
a
.--
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 37p-osv- cro ISSUE DATE: 6 REV.: //a/.m-
TITLE: jf(S oo
alb.nA>L A in, 1u J b~. dyggA/OL
/
~
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 p
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should .g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? P
REMARKS: 7 k a w , lo s 21, RA'! A Z 'J i- _n n -.2 a
*
s$hl an ,% u,No? althN d,,v>fdwr
/
STATUS OF ITEM (f)EEN'j CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
LUS
I, LIttmeeossa+ h un emelvm Gudltfel.: sd$ feh rotI ves.rtresrA '
L0C 4.. Lhewe s + sta,e fwwa),wIkedj,,n 'ysv&e,
INSPECTOR (S): /bzeojdu/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES fic
.
Were problems corrected? __
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ii- M PAGE NO.: h -I FA
,
r-
. . 3
- .
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
.
TS PARA: #,4.2./.2-(d) PAGE NO.: +'-2
$7/ ~6rl-4247
SyP o ce ~ 4 1 4 f-
67f DTt- orV9 os
i
ass [ - ) .la
' -
a
ir y
S7/" /of - o&e i \ n1M1 - -
b Afa st 1r
7
Syf /e9- nAo t _
Y ,
.
0
.
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45t/ FJ-15 PAGE NO.: 4'lO
-
.
~
. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: V.4/ J. 2. I (A_.) PAGE NO.: MV-7
TS REQUIREMENT: 7A Am M .2il AsM zE 2 w of fed
2 bwa A // Ae A!w Yd)4w A A, Ah A =- m
'
(/ ' '
,) x .
lid. PROCEDURE NO.: n#- eri-V2ro ISSUE DATE: //e</ s REV.: o
TITLE: fCs # #
n/d J J d a halu, Nb/u YtE L
I '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ,
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
DoesprocedurecarryoutTSrequirement? V
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? . #
REMARKS:(ih 74- es /- W re ets/ A. m. MAA/d M/ M w /IrMd
?N 4. t1. 2. 2. /. A 5MV 1n.A nd sL4. 0 , 3.'l'(s )
STATUS OF ITEM (OPE T CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHA Y WHEN? '
LO163 Li+tu ~~s4 utred omeden
l0$ & IIanut An O Asvt s w A,uonikeAAnn frNedero
.
INSPECTOR (S):
'
/[m o _ //Id.
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSNCTIONREPORT50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
.
___
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
,
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/ ff-7f PAGE NO.: 4-Ik 8/
.. .
, ,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 4A,7,J./[(}, PAGE NO.:
[</4/-7
g s rP- os i - V29 7 3
Syf -eri - n yt N$& (A ) lYY
Ii (/ /
SW- art - yzY9 J a
,
hmber
.
.
s
.
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45F/ 85-35 PAGE NO.: h-fli
a- . ..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: # #, S,J. / h) PAGE NO.: .34 67
TS REQUIREMENT:
7/, M -M M /w2L e 2 a 4/Me
&& RL 1//hJ D h's~A Lno,j m' ~
/ V' /
g .
LI[. PROCEDURE NO.:pp-en-+25o ISSUE DATE: //u/pr- REV.: e
TITLE: frs > Jif w / d d s b u, L.u, JUrlJsdM
#0 # '
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or g
editorial)?
V
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written? '
6
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: 6 S7p k v; mM/ 4 n >fr/ //g 7.s
5 oA W D L c r A a - i O n d ' W A z A si-
! /
,
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7 .
lui D LIunnu m vS$ I5sve Qsf rove), walbA dsw n frwde nt
INSPECTOR (S): '
daua jdd
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
.
Were problems corrected?
:
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ If-li PAGE N0.: N-I k /
.I
- ..- - . . . _ - - - _ __ - - . , _ . - _ - - . . - - - - - _ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ - _ _ - -
. . . . .
.
_ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: M,Y. 2.2, / [d) PAGE NO.: 3 4 4-1
S7/- ori-4217 3
S7/- o ct- 4.2 v7
579- 0 D - 42V 1 hsl $ A na e/u ' ' /
O) &
// Q
\
S 7 f- J o 9 - 8 4,o i 1
mYhb /Na/-
S7/- Jo 9 - 61,0 7 /
l /
,
.
.
f
.
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4SS/ PI'2/ PAGE NO.: dd A2
_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - - _ _
-- - _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _
- _.
' 5
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'
TS PARA: V,//,3./fQ PAGE NO.: 3/4 4'-B
TS REQUIREMENT:
#ce,4 m noo/o,./ me/u /a4m b /,/,,./,, sgr/~ ,
i v <
si,3M L do- .//34) /Acu lb L
-
f
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.p ' *K ISSUE DATE: 2./2 r/&s- REV.: o
TITLE: 4# % e un (b /,Lu4 /4 54M/ '
YES _N0_
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or g
!
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? _
V '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should [ '
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? . V
REMARKS:Q Srf- DI -4 5~21
fe v e Aes al An.< ss/so,u,1, J
rn . 3 .> L J , % < n N n r eute c4shwI rNuS /n An ,
S T A S'It- 4 A 'lA As .i n if + s rd w.t N!aials . < p.s + f n/a u
'
m, e> rt ona '., , 4 mar vadas en /w</
YAllM AY ~ b& hYhnl& $1$be '.' Ne lstei n s nel Me r sm hood /hs
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN^ / CLdSED"e^'o##d',a####djf744
N sir <s y og 3
3V "k
syr. *N /
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 W BY WHEN?
\ llO G) lZt.taset m e.sf arred frott$ert] lts 1r edfi&
Ii( & LJunst< Mvsb Atalw arNeL. art hr IL.4our dsenne{ clAh
IL3 (1) Lra, net sA .wed& At%A of *IedeM4.+ vretkukr., of rvs%%"
INSPECTOR (S): j[[N Md 4
t FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES y
.
Were problems corrected?
f Were any other problems identified?
I
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
l REMARKS:
l
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ fMS PAGE NO.: M$
,
l
l
_-.
.. . . _
_ _
._
.., -
,
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: //, #.1/
(2_) PAGE NO.: 3 /v 9-A
S 7P -sii-4.1 yP des lesha,< % w d / a l , u w h a d h ,. h L* m a a , b
cA4,,w / G /if,,st,4n 4v6 2/2#/Fr"
ns- rii - wA AC
a.5 i R -r.,
/*dI .- >~r^ l"'*4'bM A'l*'
. i D".y*n/II * Y * ***' < _
-
.
b
!
i
l
i
l
l
.
i
- INSPECTION REPORT 50g/ FS-If PAGE NO.
- k-f M
l
l
.-
-
.. ,
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: #A.3./ d} PAGE N0.: J/4 '/'- t'
TS REQUIREMENT:
7), i,s> A e J 2. .d LA- a ds'fjAD
n b A// k iL _AAA %oE L' '
f f
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: # ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE: Mk su d l e n fidass / inh 3-A)
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g3
Is installed system consistent with TS? g3
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or g
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS & A),,41.,u, a H., 4 s7ols R wAnn
a Ju M '? L 1 - si L Ps 1 CwMl
n 'a-J - .L: a. DL L ' r AA w LW2,
AJL'-hdA & .Alo%"M L
'we!N+,JA'DJ mL na?/'fu4s w&A
SiATUSOFITEM # kED CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
II) (O littoutl nusbt-alened~ no+o)Mhr >!tvirtur b of k orTul wed h4rws
litj @ Lnenge mss 4- innett- drocedvan 'as lpecifu'ral
INSPECTOR (S): ,
d<<us //fzad
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
-
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
.
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ 25 - 35
PAGE NO.: A -130
.,
_
. _ _ . . _ _ _. - . _ _ . _ _ -
- .
- ____ - - -
e
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
}
TS PARA: 4 % 3, / PAGE NO.: IN f-f'
[]
e sre- an -en m ,~ 1 ,s u s L , sx s n ,+~ - e
bas u l AAA YnmO M M4n nemjf _
'/
'
f /
0 m A, As Y0 /A A /Y
w n ,- ~ i as ,,,,X A6) Alp Add =. 4 -
c~Jh -.,JJL /u , , ,-jL Q
cLsx& &o :/ + -
@s,,a.ao,easo ses "XusAaL;, AAA 3.e -,y
A L A f J L ,,, .s La -, ~ rn
p '
/ V
dib$$ A%r 8 lltf cPr
IE Ac s , 4 #4s/ jfa/--, A,42 f- -, /m -
S .s W- as ,- a 2.&i ,
-
a v
DN n'- - MH
, 12 . <
b si k d_i w
/ /
Y # n < 5 XU o !< &
OA bs A+h / 2_ J'y
.
9
INSPECTION REPORT 50-95F/ Ff-35 PAGE NO.: A9 31 (
-_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _____
.-
. ,
,
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Mf,3,/ C) PAGE NO.: 9' y'- A
'TS REQUIREMENT: YJ awd 0 /ud, M, a M d
, mk s A bD A- ~ > MA) <KR "4.,
.
v
-
.
-
r
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: pars 7-v.arz ISSUE DATE: ; //-/2.-/</ REY. : O
TITLE: nauawf M (%8, }si (JL d A/u, d Ab_/ M, ~
-
/ /
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? p
Is installed system consistent with TS? p
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or .
g
editorial)? -
Does procedure carry o'ut TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should gg
work as written? -
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V '
REMARKS: s r# .zo 7- N.t r 2_ van ne/ h4v * 4 , M , p s ,/ w e,l/r _.J
'
od.~/
s
-
/,
'
STATUS OF ITEM _ ( OPEk/ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? '
IIJ G Liceste nost corud acadure
>
j.
INSPECTOR (S): -j[2 L I [ M , '~
FOL'LOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
-
.
; Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
-
,
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
.7 f
REMARKS: ..
~, .
~
_ INSPECTOR (S): '
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-u PAGE NO.: h-Il A
I ~
-
..
f'
' '
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
_
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,
...
TS PARA: Y # 3.2.I [4/,c,d) PAGE NO.: 3/v </-/o
TS REQUIREMENT: 7L swD e J x ad /!u / Yb
</ d & j 1 L n d z ml 0-ddr & M hlU
-
/
5
LIC. PROCEDURE NO. : .57Apu.gf ISSUE DATE: #/.a.4//py REV.: o
' '
-
TITLE: Os //wh/A 1,
Y / # I YES _NO
1 Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or g
editorial)? "
-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? __
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
; work as written?
-
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? //
, REMARKS
4. 4< 3. 2, l . L s rs- cos -es s O/w'./ mh s .Ma wind
44,3,2.t<Jr s i1.0
see-mr GLedlerf, roo$ .we:$f.Nsh Ikkge! due u wrs=)-
^
e o,4, 3. 3.1 L s r+ eM -se r GL., ad, e:/.i n / use,'/!M
k U, t. 7. /. .5 7er - eeo- oO / r/o A c u /Atue s Ul six eakn/
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
[UPEN)
5 FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAf'B' WHEN?
% IIk OD LTceas<t m os+ losetemeJ oerioDes er,ei,om e dr d hbhikI st*'****'
-
g l') G) LItenste senv& correch ,9Nwedka Ns_s,Nei&M)
_
INSPECTOR (S): _ /(m, , ./ _/IM-
g FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
j YES NO
- Were problems corrected? .__
m Were any other problems identified?
1 OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
h REMARKS:
4 w
: INSPECTOR (S):
-
. INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ff->f PAGE N0.: k-13 3
i
a
b
___
. - . -- - - __ . _ . . ..
.
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: V. Y.7.J. 1 (4s !*sc , d ) PAGE NO.: 3/y Vdo
TS REQUIREMENT: bna reuhr coolent sushe en'ssw Isol=k welwe swa fu'l A Tale
.
1.Y.Y. A-/ slivelJ 4e denionsfe.f rd cwr.1,le Lv Ir k frsfro. ,,,,,,,+ f, s,,cy, ,1;z,, y,g,f
e.d wortfu inekee et eul valve +v k 'sul+ kin +4e sreds'e5 I.'mits
'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: K ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE: A See 44 ded dah4 cs4f? 4 cah I4tef
'
YES M
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ,
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
, Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: STr avv-f ?o a, .hu I,.E r<ft fesh Fur Al & cc IG ts- Aov-ovs Aiovsk
welet et t1-vf ror A doesn't e xis4. Reavival emi,no,ek- tasvHrated Aeh.M i.e. pq
netds 4vleraue. sin of base 1est conkt.n e 3 Conde<inke bo* boy lee h's. nd ide kke l.
,
Str' Av 3 -94,* 3 G % 7.v n eels swifek nombre inser M l.e. E at cos3. IAels 4.%~< Sci nn
onsd & urn *4M. i.e. rusel sism 8613A -Fors - frot**L#t s(**s I&so , hovonoes. Cuk%,od
'
@
'
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN? ,
'
' lly (O $ lesL rsk 4tst (Lo'usset )
lI1 O Lrassee msV corred yrne dm e swerked
\b4 & trcenue mas 4 coueat prueja as " swr &ked
INSPECTOR (S): dsm/ j. dw 7x
FOLLOWUP ACTION: ' INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? :
"
i Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-35 PAGE NO.: h-D V
,,e,
r ww'* -'w--- -r- -_.-m .m ,,y __ ,----, , wy n
__
. .
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA:
N,#.5.2.2-.hl /
PAGE NO.: [q 9-/p
(6). S 7P- Aor-R o t LPcs A,niuu n W ku dA A>]y & A%o-tsdy/&; i
d,s
37t'- Ae3-3 3 AI Pc 7 Ausni 1/b s t A Igi b ,4 u e i2,4 r)/y
., .-- -
h) ' 5 7P ~,t s 4 -3& o z Mic usw d b i A dy A/
Ab<r0 -t/pbe - '
s a - .
~
.
, .
..
_
-
Ldo(E F
i S W' Roy- Nn '? AAd huna
f
b m&Y s -
,
O/ 2 N '
. . . .
, , L. ,
Se marks CONrd : 54er G.s & STt' w't-3wa. also needs k I,e tn
STf tes -3 603, No icsH -V% n'asinfltd. Sysfest won b dr& i f ato
Venf is opened la c CS%V'tf an.t Cs!!-V4 9
.
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45g/ Pf-3f PAGE N0.: A-05
. - - . . - . - - . _ _ _ . , _ . -- . _ _ - . . _ - _ .
.
.. .
-
.
9
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: A #, M PAGE NO.: 3 /V 9'-/'/
TS REQUIREMENT: 7/f m d e I//M I Mzs/l
la 8 nih/ Pkm A A ~)/_/u
! ! V f
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 57A ooo-9eso ISSUE DATE: //2 e/w REV.: o
f TITLE: 7 d b /.n ez
-
/cmM/IoMiz#/A4 b p p
YE'S N_0_
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? y
Is installed system consistent with TS? j
4 Are there any problems with the TS (factual or y
editorial)? '
-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? 7
REMARKS - +TP -een-9eec) M e d n A /' m 7- s
4. % 4. / , 3 . b 4. M. C . / 4. 4.'/. l. 2,
ACQawmMh 4,4. H L / A ,
/ /
J
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM N)
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
I A-l C Lice,see mus+ issue potejure, fu Iglea,ef +cchsteal .rseafkeha
.
- .
INSPECTOR (S): / M M /d M
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
i Were problems corrected?
> Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-15 PAGE NO.: 4 -/36
_ ~ __ _ . , - - - _ - _ - - - . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . _ --
- .
. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: f,IfI PAGE NO.: IV V-//
TS REQUIREMENT: 7/, oh of o/ M M q
Ja A_bb MA h_kdA &
ddo _ n_dm w/wI> A m d/ $ d '4 W < -/
L4C. PROCEDURE'NO.: [v-seo-%p ITSUE DATE: / " /A.s //r REV. : a l
TITLE: 7& Lm1DJ '
L llwid/l>Auc]&>/
/M' YES' M !
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g
Is installed system consistent with TS? ,4 ;
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
g
editorial)?
-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should pg
work as written?
Has licensee completco procedure walkdown? v
REMARKS
s WJ- e ee 9ew da J wk r c. s 4, r- rdt v </, s"~ / d d
n 2.~A/ 2 1 L w.,~ s D ,,. m . "
I
Q f /
STATUS OF ITEM [0 PEA) CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
l 1.3 O LEttoesec msf inolemesf den Ala}y reeou%osek of keitonital
'
' '
l sfecTFm4rs
INSPECTOR (S): j b , j M ju
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N0_
l
l Were problems corrected? '
Were any other problems identified?
l STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
!
i
REMARKS:
l
l
INSPECTOR (S):
i -INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-Jf PAGE NO.: k -l) 7
l
l
,
~
_ . . - . .
.
.
.
l
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET l
.
T5 PARA: //,4./,,/,/ PAGE NO.: 3/s t'-Jo
TS REQUIREMENT: DoA e /_ ILIm m/ E / h ./d d
&$b 2LEwk A $!s L' AL , .<AAla AJ!M
db 11 L Ju A~L, uk LA i 'o
A Agy4c
M.~h0tYDTREM.': fr$.','I7.,@' ISSUE DATE:' ' /2/w/#'F REY.:
TITLE: /CS de, /7hed,di'IhLA '
'
dS M
Is there any difference between rSAR/SER and TS7 g
Is installed system consistent with TS? m
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
jA
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should j
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS-
srP~oro-c1oo kw A & s '. /S Id . c i e' n i d 1M mh
'
~
l
_M }:L e /sw A-i
e ji
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
G) Lfccact nosf totreef rotelwres (S spec 7f,'ed
l }-3 f
INSPECTOR (S): / I.< u u M d ,
'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other pr6alems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5-75 PAGE N0.: & 4 3P
J
. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: #,4.4,/,2. PAGE NO.: J[/ 9'-2/
TS REQUIREMENT: # 5 f u , ( A uso. o lu // l e ,.4 d- A / 2 A _ t M p
nl wAn'// A L1/J r h da . 3. + x. . s - / - - -
- M n _u
'
LAl im,u K'A'L
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: $rp Iro-ow ISSUE DATE: /2/4/.fv REV.: o
TITLE: Ax -tvm///m , Xmmd e
# # '
/d A2ML
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
g
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? #
REMARKS
$7 P 0To- 670/ DA o Y YS 4. N'. 4 /. ~L A$ SttANYI* C1'*pon,g
(O S T P- A cv- ogoo om e~l' N} d e '/ r d a w w c s'c ' '
// /
c
STATUS OF ITEM 0
(0 PEN) CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
l 9-1 0) LN mee nas b corred ,frocedert essreciftd
INSPECTOR (S): fue , //[,ad
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g "
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? l
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
I
l
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ p5-15 PAGE NO.: &/ 37 l
__ . - _ _.
__ _. _. ._
. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: #A /,, /,3 PAGE NO.: /4 v-2/
TS REQUIREMENT:
4r age / h.A /usd,, oum*, - N hc
judw as= ,/) - -
. - - m ,, $6 - sm-,4
_s Aa /] J a s u i k A A d , /,,~ >.n e/.da 14.4./-/
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:grA vs$-37of ISSUE DATE: N/oI/Mr REV.: o
TITLE: 4 A sifs ,, w ,S ai m a i.d. ~ $ d E w L A
'
YES' M
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
p
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? -
,/
REMARKS
0)Ts 4. 4. &, f. 3 .s > >Jia A ed f 4. 4,4 . /. 3- / , s 7s - o S'o - 3 76 /
~ - ,: -
'
/ u s e. e. t . x -i / M \
~ ~
, rJ4 A
dtld na I -
. _ _ .
_ s rr - o ro - 376 f
dLa 4 N 4. 4,6, 3 , ~~CD r < ek d RafaL/a.ui./e6 f 73
STdTUSOFITEM PEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WH WHEN? ,
lh5 G? Li>eas e t us'sf' correct y rme) vet as vedft)
INSPECTOR (S): ,dous j/fd,
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES &
Were problems corrected? .
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95-75 PAGE N0.: h -tyo
._
_
.. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: $8, /,,/. Y PAGE NO.: j y
a~. /) t'-Jf
Y
TS REQUIREMENT: /v
t AA11.M #
6
ao
c5nd 8 & E, ,,,fE m >
/A2#3s A,~ M
, -
, _
, .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 37A se -oei ISSUE DATE: #/w/N REV.: 6
TITLE: /A I /dnsu 2f.m 1, '
O ' O I
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
,
j
Is installed system consistent with TS?
j
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
g
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 7
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN ) I
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
,
^
INSPECTOR (S): [vw /M_ ' '
FOLLOWUP ACTION: ' INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? '
Were any other problems identified? t
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
i
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75- 35 PAGE NO.: A -I'//
i
___ _ _, -- _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ . . . . _ . . . . _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ - _ _ , . . , .
. - _.
. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: PAGE NO.: 84/ +/-2/
TS REQUIREMENT:
M Y,/,,/,
Avow) Y h 4j /$m /m#/Olde__s i _,mA$ 2
AUL. ,WJJM ls,$2W A b nl .
_
,
/ E n *s
LIC. PROCEDURE NO. : .n/-en -o 2a/ ISSUE DATE: /2/9//F REV.: o
TITLE: Av m s/ ]/w r j w s w ife & w XJa d- ifylff
# " ' #
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
g
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
INSPECTOR (S}: '
bjjjsj j /[s,2b,
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-Jr PAGE N0.: A -I R
. . _ _ _ _ _ . -
. . _ _ _ _ . _ _ , _ _ . ._. _ _ - . . . _ . _
_.
. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: #M, L L PAGE NO.: I4 9-2y
TS REQUIREMENT: A 4/e- /_ _m w o w M # M A M J./
l }l.t A 1 A, /syr- As' d.dJ L, p /2 L,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: SM-m- ee/ ISSUE DATE: p/w/pv REY.:
'
a
'
TITLE: DY /L, n,X -
"
$ >.
" ' # YES _N.O.-
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
NA
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
g
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? - ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
'
Has licensee completed procedure.walkdown? ,V
REMARKS
i 37P~e00-oner /l>>4 dr w N d Y J2 Amp ~AMid
,
l
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
l [0P
I FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHA BY WHEN? .
Iu C La%s<e mas + raatene.:& vearooticik roevirem<.k of +rL~wi
SullIfthh%1
INSPECTOR (S): /bw jM. '
FOLLOWUP ACTION:'[NSPECTIONREPORT50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected? '
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-75 PAGE NO.: 4 -1Y3
l 1
_.
. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: .M M 7
'
PAGE NO.: 9 9'-23-
TS REQUIREMENT: d . /J[ - -- AS/ v!s- a /s// / / M w I d
/fstasA8 L a ll A M A ~ Ja A m 36 s M -
! ~-- -~ "Ax4l N ?s M i A N s/ J f J Ax /
'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 37Aaf-am " ISSUE DATE': ///;-s%/ REY.: M
TITLE: Ab 2 Nu Ma#W4A '
YES NO,
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
j
Is installed system consistent with TS?
g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
yg
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? ,/
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS - ~- xop-to9. e3eiDL 13c n%w inst-fo.22n
A s w d lEl m '/l m /u > 't /m - Au m - A/w , $$'u A24 &
H u_ w n a Z N i s a / w .>i J s ra u ~4/o
$,u'H/ wsw'. N, wiw n,J d a Auro?
'
n $dn am&
W%uY"l
Fm/ Au ins'/Ua AA'k$ a At s o 4so v of N AMJht}k J I tL
STATUS OF ITEM '
( OPEN]
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED [
u
[
4
lb-)
_.
(D Llagu m&deftsmakt e%fof lenn% MHV swikke s% ask 4 - we2//w W.
r Of FAs
lV @9 Littuu m&,stedfy wLu Wyedb%% .Jtt be perfsime)
INSPECTOR (S):
FOLLOWUP ACTION: ,-by 2[M- -
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? .
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7HJ PAGE NO.: k-/ Y 4
. . . - _ . _ _ -
.. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET ,
TS PARA: 8,M, 9 /
PAGE NO.: - I9 V-2 7
TS REQUIREMENT: gl 4 / h d7/~~ N1_=='J Aao/Madd
jis) A nf n &>Adu,,Lnwd,!J J
Alm,/,A % A u n s.la ' 2K nos a r y,,sa,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO,.: srA eso- m m
. ISSUE DATE: r/2v/d REV.:
'
o
TITLE: M>Ji 4.mMm I
W' U V YES _N_O
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7
g
Is installed system consistent with TS?
g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
y
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? "
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS.
s w- sob -owet dRo dA-s' y' /2 L mA J
'
STATUS OF ITEM /0 PEN' CLOSED
FOR"0 PENS",WHOMUSTD0WbA Y WHEN? ,
IM (O G%sa %st %ks.,f remMib re autremcJs of
' '
4tt N nsh i yecTh'eN%r
INSPECTOR (S): b MdaI
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTIONREP0iT50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected?
,'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-7f PAGE NO.: /r-/f5/
-
_ _ _ _
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
4 .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 84, k 2. PAGE NO.: Mv W-M
TS REQUIRENENT: /2] AJ & ,WLn e d u J,.4 ,,,/
A///t s A ._, d.,i m L,,. >>> w e nN-SWAY [d/dj$4
, 2 L L 4 , A,io1~ A L s n L a s s w iz' n
LIC. PROCEDURE'NO.: p-gar-ooo/ ISSUEdATE: M2p/M REY.: n
'"
TITLE: Ob /6/
#
d
#
I-'
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
g
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? D ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? D
REMARKS
s 79-con - A ces t D>b d u n'/ '
'y
s1 L . Au.iws.a/
d.
~'\
,
STATUS OF ITEM @ PEN) CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
l30 CD LTtouet
I m.itt insolent & sern)Tch rt4pMminf5 sf-
" '
4tch n rcs i G ettfr d % 1
INSPECTOR (S): /); w M/bM
FOLLOWUP ACTION:' INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
l YES N_0
Were prot,lems corrected? .
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
!
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ )T-3f PAGE NO.: h-/ </(,
l
-
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
l TS PARA: #,v. ,2 /, 2. (c) PAGE NO.: vyJC9-2
l TS REQUIREMENT: 74 _f,,/ds da /,, M - m a m ,o d d , M o d
'
.ab>// 1 s <$ m b s llr%
.
-
i 1/s SA ei ./m/ sN /s,ww ,e/& .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 57A o<-/-42ff ISSUE DATE: du/fr REV.: o
TITLE: ACS L/rf,r):c}/u/s bw im a,f e[,/ m/,fn k
# 0 / .
g
l YES
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? m
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or gp
f editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v' '
-
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should NA
work as written?
l
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
l
REMARKS: @s r A- en- 4270 ~ t%p w & , n ]is & _cfa. u&
ag In 2 n 4.<i. 1 , 2./. A & 4 </, 2, J, 2. J &4 , ~1. ( . 2
!
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
[' 0 PEN)
- FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT~BY WHEN? *
'
l3[ CO Li cratet osve& e <<ec& w rueAstr
I% LItfnsee MO IMve elffvrevf), Wdktd dwst fnhtAMS
INSPECTOR (S):
'
/bu _- / dumb
-
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
-
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ fi-M PAGE NO.: A' '/{~)
ITECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS' PARA: 3/'f. 6. I PAGE NO.: 3/'/ Y-/ Tlice 9 sl 2/4 E-6
TS REQUIREMENT: Momeroa - " E ccf on eedy
.
l LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: AJ/A ISSUE DATE: N/A REY.: A1/4
TITLE: #/A
g
'
YES wer fevie s .c9
'Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v
Is installed system consistent with TS? v
l
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
j. editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? y
l '
l Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should v
work as written?
! Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? ,
v
REMARKS: #1 revico .$ a k a. seef.a (,- e e lef...es . [ cfc . =J = Ad.re) .
M -v.rLA 4LJ r,db #-r. / m.m i ,J dde '
e. , ,J.
'
dro.dkee ree.aew dr necect r w fa '
or. n dFMs940Er7[ a[ rvr/. w
'
"
l J. At A a %.a.~ 2.s. i
-
n
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
1
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? *
I
INSPECTOR (S): .h . L . b 24 <,r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
4 ,
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FT- 25 PAGE NO.: 4-lW
.
- - - - . - . - . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _
. .
.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/4. f.d. PAGE NO.: 3/4 6-6 Tje. f 3/y 5-7
TS REQUIREMENT: Amerms - " Ecc c ShM.ma "
.
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: N/A ISSUE DATE: M /A REV.: n/A
TITLE: N/A ~
YES g aerbed
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or L/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: il reu ed & .Leve T.cf. ear (,e e. m / lc.4 ,s . { c/c .. J e dsfor,a O. '
.- 4 :L n.dhe ,.t e.M..a . ., . v.ad , . s.1. x ~..r-,f..J.-
'
2.s . do '... " ,s , <. r. J . m u.,G..a.9a s.a.- u.s.2- _ u '
f. ,A.d k a.,oreae, A sur0.. % ce r-a. . e..u.dc n.ca s ca r ., +e ' ',,e a '
onneaA 3 Ls.-c ,J..A C..a :. c. L , s.s.:t
'
h
' '
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? "
g33 L.CuJLL 2.r. 3. t. 7 , . . J. .. . skolA L,e 2. s . S . Jr ( A/A.
cowuf)
INSPECTOR (s): D.L. b2eis
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected?
.Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
-REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS- 35 PAGE N0.: k-l 49
- _ _ _ _ _
, _ . _ . - - . __ - .- - - - . . _ _ . - _ . . . - .. _-- -
O
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/'/.E 3 PAGE N0.: 3/'/ 5-P 74rouy 4 3/4 5'-9
TS REQUIREMENT: Amereas - * Sm o,,., gs,;,, peo (
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: M/A ISSUE DATE: Aj/A REV.: N/A
TITLE: N /A
'
YES N0 por An ad
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
#
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should v
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? I/
REMARKS: 8) re o ,,m .) doo, reef, w b e emol.4 cr [.<dx, d
< e&d.rsd. L4e V E.3 2. lx =/rr,A. s.'ef J . hI ver,$ .S +Ld
c.ek n 45.2 a noaars '
+. ed A.Cu < N re'o ra. k. s ur n .'// w ar
ra_v~A neN.ctar, +s ored CNAkGtG7ye$ J w
.2Ak s :. sa.~" 2.s'a
' '
i STATUS OF ITEM (OPEN) CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
5% c4so w Q G.3.3..A- is m.rsrlu . & S//sra e +/.,_ $ r "
l 3'(
dJ.n.k o9 y. s .1. n . a . L'NttA conun
INSPECTOR (S): b. L. D u3e r*r
! FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
_N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
! -STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
l
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
(, INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5'-3E PAGE NO.: k-I 50
L _ _ _ - ___- _____
1
.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET l
TS PARA: 3/4. 7. 3 PAGE NO.: 3/V '7-f 7Te,o74 3/y '7-9
-TS REQUIREMENT: Mu reer -
" de.ckr G Is,, /j,,p !
C,e\ .'aa, Saile a "
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: _ M/A ISSUE DATE: Al/A REV.: A//4
TITLE: N/A '
YES NO g6rAPveneed_-
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v
Is installed system consistent with TS? 7
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should y
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: il r.o.. d dw. s cf. f.,r e- ld .cr , [adr .rd
au.,:.0 . u 1.,.C.s +Lt s.a,- e.,2 L. .c, & .)J.c, ~ ,s
c a. m .e ;... .. . .A o. <,<<. ~ A m.,i uma,r, '. t , 's.-
,ML:a , %L 2. 7. 2 ! ' ' '
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
INSPECTOR (S): b. L. h 3 a.1
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES fl0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S): b
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS*- 25' PAGE N0.: h-I S I
,,
!
__._ - , _ . _ _ - _ _ _ . . . , _ . _ . _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ , _ _ . - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ __. _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Ec CS /ACIC. PAGE NO.: A1/h
TSREQUIREMENT$ '%ro eM onc e inrecebrer mcf de e. ,, o; Id(.
.
d a c u oa . h C.c- u se in d A .'~ +L. .ner& AJ ~ c-9 secs
'
'
caHen' aJ Aka Rcr.c sa rh .l. .
lid.PROCEDURENO.: L e Atkcl.J ISSdE DATE: A//4 REV.: NA
*
.
t
TITLE: AJ/A
'
YES N0, Ner R.med .
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or y
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should p-
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: Tke dacd.d /',.d Mem Sh ef /,r/r a // #4e
Cur o e d%e s ea .A a. < an n u ek 4. T.eknd L.c,Cc.}ran.r
t. A nx 3/4.'5. I 3/4. s': b . 2/4. r. 3 ad 3N.7. 3 ud '
i
+t. rais ..a ,,'s . A ,k . L + .
'
0
STATUS OF ITEM 0 EN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT WHEN?
'
l33 (0 Tkr erecekt odeb-Seb M Revona o e r- AFr
cu N A Ge s< te b as a W e. ) raroee A se-et
l
,
INSPECTOR (S): 'b . L . b a *Re I
'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N0
f Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
! STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5~ 2 5 PAGE NO.: 4 -l 5 A
E
-
-
--
-
.,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: Eccs //fcIc. 64=ed PAGE NO.: N/A
'
/
'
5 he Pme,A... No J.. e ha 1,w A;. 4.c e&cf.oe bode
* oco-ooon 0 W9Y/64'
* ab9 - 06o 2 O t/9/85
ao3- oao1 0 3/as/85
e 303 - 83el O jo'/4,TY
* Jo3-obot o. //2/P5
e 363 - obo3 O to/Y//'f
e as4 - osot a la/Y/Py
'
* Jo4 -c3e t O ///2/PY
~
a.oy-obeI blrt o
* 305 - 0 00( O /0/S~/EY
* ao!s O3ol o fo/r/EY
aoS'- obot br&+ o
= 3a9 - 09at 0 %/8/W
ao? - o sca. brdt o
e 3e9 - chof O 2h/W
,
-. 2o7- e6ea- o a///P5
e 2b9- 66cy O afy/25
'
Br M o
'
l So?- o6ct '
% 9 0603 6cb4 o -
e Go9 - obo3 o ///a //fy
r
__f%s.s ek,a
h e Proeekee AbM -0015 V V/a9/PS
.
..
I
. co-pt.A. A WWA.e w
INSPECTION REPORT 50- / FS-36 PAGE N0.: d'lf) g
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: EccS /Acrc pace NO.: A//A
Sdrw,
TS REQUIREMENT: 'Lc o< d6 Orocekure s u re d +o
4# r -tre meM r d de 'T' T - f
1
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: A LL- ISSUE DATE: N/A REV.: Al/A
TITLE: N/A-
t noT
YES @ g,qwwss
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? l/
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V '
,
,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? #70%
!
REMARKS Te e. a b r1 d A d a. ced- e % 5'd.ef
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
(OP
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 Wtmi nr WHEN? ,
DLR enW n& Corresh frocNvv4 AS Sped fleY
l]Q
!
.
INSPECTOR (S): D L. M & te
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPOP,T 50-458/ 7 5- 2 E PAGE NO.: Ar'I f V
XI
...
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: Eff$,/4CZ C Codsau.ch PAGE NO.: N/A
Q b 4de @o .Leoe.Na.ere '
.oro c.ebres reift ed ecd
Sccc <t- A' crc, -he -fa' ilo ca i mcfen c'**'
4Le4 are' ypla e. 9(ei E d to-sed :
probbes were
'
. sta. n-. Lers ~ca. n.t w<z%4i e M .a ik deios
reder en a u (occs\ f. lac sas.fon.d
s w2& ') ia n.L\ c e:fese oF p'ee Aees +4.t ~en
s. w L,s.4.w.A .r 1, e + e..isd J ,u;&.e
eg s'
.
c9re edt sech.-e o f , f
c.Aurer
Cre-so3- caoI a.J s'rP- acV- oral A
no% % w.ca <3 A&qa,-es . %a pr.<An-s
-
sk.JA Le u.<7 s imil. Ac .
. r+ i s af, pace.J +Lt %. 'op rams group k.c not
to-lk.1 Aean nro.d( e oroc.e b rer . . <r . s /,o r
are ask oG place i s.~c ff-ts ee & D 4 Le pe'~ Gr~cd
6. wie u.e pc.o.our rf.g pt c J 14e .cyr/% <s
4. c vs a. +c m s. e ,, A ,
Ais. ,u to. Ad.ugs +. f r.oear
parCoeJ .f.,tkee ik f.shtiq/.sf J
= = - c.p.a.@ c-s - * tr'er ' =A . e - o"("3
'
sAece
p=Ls eS She p i d E uste d f A ..h k.~eupt 'n
o s e. 4-l.e r . t'=u c l Nw . f 4. W w t I-(oer
-Fa 4.Lp o.G Yk.oce loc
eeA7
-O +nMk [eei .
, fre ce kres nc"*^C\ S rc app r ' Ale I 'l~o N' " *I'
o( odoos oO.m ciru.cc e.c c a&k +L c.dra (
L,.-<-As
.&.L-(.3 e f -/4k v.(oes .
.
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4SP/ TE-35 PAGE N0.: A-I55
XI
_-
~
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: '/'f. /. A . l PAGE NO.: 3/y f-f
TS REQUIREMENT: Ar3., L e v..A L J 4k., L.h N o,.de + 1 3 & x v r fem
fEPcs Y s.s k Sem 4 b A. ds one '
vafJc' Y b Cu tie - t se(Yr e e
'
lee
[it .Nf(N ,.3.kl Mer-!
LIC. -PROCEDURE N0. : 57F .*k6.opof ISSUE DATE: / c/.57'f9' REV.: O
TITLE: Afr_s A*,,6 LL4.c EI/ l %fge Ar,t,.n V.r,Md m
' ' '
YES tj0 g[qb sd
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 7
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
'
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? W
REMARKS: .) /em,Lr., sb /. 2 1 a rAk Jo,c ..f d d o ra.L M x.t in
Tel. he E 1Y.~ C ,s g = 2M s-L
A... tha ead . k (f b.0 ..'. ,.; .t
.y. 7
nacl +hl .
m
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WH WHEN?
$2 Mdb b nrec .d.. l.2..I t.o.rA.b w.6 T S . N ef._". .
lo. L n oY Iab . 2/N 5- L ( Litea tre )
-
INSPECTOR (S): D , L . h2e d
FOLLOWUP ACTION: , INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ P E ? 5' PAGE NO.: h-/f(,
.
_
-
'
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4'. 6. / . g . / PAGE NO.: 2/eir E'-e/
TS REQUIREMENT: Var C bu vedo. J b k.dk 4.74 ve d M J & '
c y s4e + ( L P e r ) f - $ . Y r S 4 e ,o b s.a d..rels. e valde L %e nyinm
orelsda.~ vatae os h Ile} m,% as ter.
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:sTPac8/-osor ISSUE DATE: /p/y/ft/ REV.: O
TITLE: LPer b.uk,. F.1/~' KII J Wlve L u.m .a' V. Sede.
'
#
YES NO A W2
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
~
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
-work as written?
V
Has lice e completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS h ) Alm c .c b /. a . / Jo.c .f ,,,cfj. r. , ,M.c d .
Te d . Ca. . eu eafien e [.r- 4) r.S U C dd.m 49-6. 21
'
de<edor= Sdew
/.tf . I Jos n t sfde alJis +L. rceuS ee ee.V.e,L as ro.a.C d aL 1
-% , T.S . 11 Pr.e. s d . ~ 2. I a.nD L h . a .t ac< -4,A ."G W r S ~ d
Orn e .o . Mvh SHEtr 4) Pree. *
9b S W - ]f Afes ar e repos.twd ed
**'
STNTYSTF'IYEd CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
l3) ..'t> Licenev wk Csers$ ereAdre as 1/tdfi's)
G1
CO trcune n,&de.d zlsfes liv eetsorik, lode %,/ suln'<e, oF valar.
- . ,
INSPECTOR (S): D.L.D h 3
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES t@
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
i INSPECTOR (S):
l
)
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8S'- 3 5 PAGE NO.: h-li /
l
l
I
L
___ . .---_ _ _ --
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: #/ F. /. o. . / C basel PAGE NO.: C/V 5'-V
(I) s1' P,.c. sL, 2 3 r/J., -H J - - L c. cr, % , ;e mel.
The c 'v .% c,' ca.s nd be met Jf, f #e <*l0*s are Me r.fc d ,
~
1,.be* e '$.~ ~ ,1ar r. + W'*0'Y +$.Y. I]>*o lM
o'Pc ep a rkwn .
s) Pr.r. s:L 2.y -#,Jr e. h sLLc -M J A 4.J o.fo-r ce de
o. Oe As b~ fit -Nw M.ek. It A p/ ce Ie a(( %.1 I
'
-/L.4 e
retstr 0 . ~14 A - ok is e.k. k .b , L % q, (ce pa,c;f,n
a
'
a ct. A S. .
7),Ab.in oata mu6., mar. derh r..fo<k.4/re.AJ
Joet a of .p ert voAces
.~ 7% o/ eat ck.ckt.'rf
e4f-, A.,m i alu'<1 .c s. sod
refarW oP 'gatiet to
' '
ree*B.wre.
heie nerd'a& %re'eabI(m[ek.eocebres
pec,1,as t pr.4i Ae spe elirteV +k
e, fec c4.c.c.t,.,s +o
nloc.k er reseal 4ke o m ,I. c . ii . l ii . rc i
[ P} 'f rec . b h.eps '7 2ll. I r/. 3. g. 1 [ "7. 3. 3 I ;nc{tede
ros y c b e o. A u. L -s ,+ L e ,re. c.k.&.4 -Ac
po t,1%
M,s ,o a .GGE aab Ar- 5%n
y +76 a as s+
o YAr- y4A , s h F a of 3,
fr asy Fs k 97- 7A,
re oi r . a to, 6/2.s/py o. r. 6.ik pft , c.4(, f. h
1 Pe_I q s f.g a.r c. cdc.ftd clocussd.s /.co.$ J
i w. n e_ c d c. ( re o m j . Q a.c ut J 6yh
ca,O ra t ro en pars ssne l . A eleseep q <=. sis
G<.%saw % %s pr. &c *
a.c 4. IIs ent:
+1,e. 65 pr,J do.c n . t cA. a 4% q.) oulo c
u s..k i 4;c cAe oL e + k, .rfo e
& QJ.s%.c pra.'he cks * t .
,
9
,.
l
I
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45P/ FF-35 PAGE N0.: Ar-lJ P ,
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: t/.F./.c./ PAGE NO.: f/V F-y
TS REQUIREMENT: b,b,k /,o ve d's f -#t, Ad me,*d veds Md f-de
cusfen (HPcri a,% l $en? 4Le o b.- n d, rdNm e' va foe de /be Corf m
' '
n.i.L.: v.ud 'd phi,J o.n ' Je', .
'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: sTp 2o3.Ogo; ISSUE DATE: 3/ca/P5 REV.: O
TITLE: //per Abg tJ3.,- K// J U,les forefoa 1/e n fee d m NeY
YES tg qgg, pro
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or g/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
# ,
REMARKS:
m
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): D . L. D 2 e..s
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected? ,
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff- 3 6 PAGE N0.: h-lic/
,_ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
--_
g
" - -
-
'
*
- -
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
^ '
4
TS PARA: V.F./. c. A. PAGE N0.: 4 /u .5;t/
TS REQUIREMENT: LPcs - Ver.fw,L +/mf el volo _ J 7mo., ,,er.,/.2or
adamke . ; %e Qas n.kk %b le nd eke). wl.h or- cil Nbese seeArd h
' ~
~ per.% ';x & ,+3 eNred pasda m . ~
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:sTF,1oE- cpot ISSUE DATE: /e/.s-/fy REV.: c
TITLE: Lfts f,1l LSd.r 6/l d Wlve Air,hm 1/an [ic d m
'
YES NO [[pg
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v'
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
V
~
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? -
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
-
.Doesthehrocedurewalkdownindicatethatitshould /
work as written?
Has licensee iompleted procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: drce. Teeb ew l. 3 1 Meadr Yke ( ll.a s ce rt:SLs
~ a.Md be c.wbre w.tk +ke ~F S..t "
-- Me msh '
? Y
is Neo sb -
_
^
~
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
-
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WH Y WHEN?
ly0 AAA =AAhm T. S . o ar As'% 4. '
croc. seeh m I. 3.. I ' CUcearet
toretLY,e reitOJ*t )
-
~
.
'
INSPECTOR (S): D . L . M er.r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50'-458/
.
YES NO
'
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S): ~
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8 C- S E PAGE NO.: A -l60
-
,
#
.h .m_.-.._m- _ _ _
- _-_____ _____ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _
.- _
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: t/.5'.l.a._ A PAGE NO.: _7/V .f t/
TS REQUIREMENT: L.ft".I - W,.1,6 44.3 ed Mo$ . m *
0. oc ,o.J.c/
or A . . i L Sla.a N 'er m4 l.ek wid, N oYia '
s.~ rect nk mac.k lr iN de w e , & s 'ac. % l .
'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STe 304-09oI ISSUE DATE: /p/y/fy/ REV.: O
TITLE: Ucr b,sek,.e f,1*u KIl#J \ hive Lm.uE Ven[ic.d.m .
Mh.d _
' '
YES fj0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should v
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: T d. Af.5'. l . u . 2 .f ne T. S . 2 m,rea fd od oo.Le i.k
& Cl..a sk +U .'s u.f / ck.d . e.J.) o a- eM .ake sn,eb a
car,4 ' lc ,; .ts e .ce d b ec.+< m . Pe.e. r-/.x 2.3 s idar
'thd ',4 'a.c % e tc '
A b o's. k (.A w,l/ d. J.e.0L reLea
4. ii s ECCS o_p rMe uk EccS r,.', 8 [I smc=I, M c..dound '
' '
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
h C(OSED
IY( CD Liavet n<&e or_auf coJIYcf behee. vruse k a nl
~ '
terinAJ svec/Abh I
INSPECTOR (S): 3). L . [L*@o is
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM GPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ [.f- 26 PAGE NO.: d-l f, /
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET j
TS PARA: M F. /. q . 9 co dew ecl PAGE NO.: 3/F S-tf
a a. d - s+.it naf. L - ,w % .
*
+L cc.h. '.a ,s
.
I
CF 4"t4 1C e FCC stre a [7. 5e ke te rt
. ,>
'
Ne,o 73 ts : A eMssyr.e *4 c.+L +Le T S ,
.
.
d
i
~
!
l
.
$
l
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4SP/ PC- SS PAGE N0.: 4-l(g (
L
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4'. E /. w .1 PAGE NO.: 3/q 53
TS REQUIREMENT: ' HPts - Wnt/ M .I mio. . md_ m.c m,d.cf o r-
ad he . ,L 4Le $lms odl hld ir not f.eku$.1 afeb. eduwa<a e seeuree)
,. , d. h . s 'c . c . A ,. . ..+.. . .
LIC. PROCEDURE N0. : Sn a ,;to3-oaof ISSUE DATE: $/opMr
'
REV.: o
' TITLE: #Pcs f2.A. d .c Kil d W.Ive Ar.ti Vu.M,3.m
' ' g[[ con _
YES 10
k'
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
.Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
e
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): h. L . ]hle d
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
.
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ [5~ .98 PAGE NO.: k -l63
-.
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M5'./.3.I PAGE N0.: 1/y .f-y
TS REQUIREMENT: L e c i' _ M e ( so r o ldoc of / f..d ho .om a d4
.om* J I r. d d a'~ se oM s- d er- 44u3 0
As 88/ mrb.
<
' 7
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:syp ,por- 03of ISSUE DATE: /0/gfV REV.: O
TITLE: APts Mg, Ooer&E 9 Pa' FAa Lt
'
0
YES g dhtA_
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: See Gdte"dm Shah
n
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED ,
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
lyA. Proc. Otem 7N 7 h m.'er,4 IrI.r.sur,4ddw CWN. fee
9101$ rnimY er'9tedvd)
-
t
INSPECTOR (S): D . L . h 2 a ,.S
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S): '
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ f5'- ?F PAGE NO.: A--l(, '/
. . . . . _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ .
.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: V.F./. A./ cod.~u d PAGE NO.: 3/'/ 5 z/
r) free. steo 7 3. 9 . l. I : Tle Sh o r, 'a secoua rti c e
s~b.re d a X k +L :.r 24.p is s e+ L ' 'ss'a ps. y .
'
a) /ree . s +co e/. # . 2. : ' f ,.>elb Le ,oc A..t b o. r A.,
,
+k.k %e Lecs pnp c-e +,, aa tae & op - n p,4, f
r L c+,L +Le omo.
2) Proc.sf.p 7 4'? ha-s aat regir e a.d d a.J
vertic.D v h b r. 1 9r -
.
e
)
INSPECTION REPORT 50-49h/ F5-35 PAGE NO.: d~l 65
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4.5 /, 3 .9 PAGE NO.: 2 N 5-4/
TS REQUIREMENT: l.fc.I. he Jeoe(ear . M4 ebd dasf rosb um t.p.f4
% om
a u
Ader.M redr= orbr-
' g
N-oramud o
lo /so[.r)/ - '
LIC. PROCEDURE N0. :srp M-o2o/ ISSUE DATE: n/A/fy REV.: O
TITLE: LPc'c kg 1 ~)aa Test
YES _tj(0 gg"$[ygg
'
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V'
'
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): D.L. d a h e_s
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8 - f f PAGE NO.: h-l 4
)
. _
. .
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: V.5././r.3 PAGE NO.: 3/4 f.- t/
TS REQUIREMENT: HPcf -
d=0 font . M.c o[ d d asf Sb/o em ceN
.l , b . 1 3 o r.'r e m'r e or.3.c C er e. d Ja M9 $ c'l .
. ,.a. -
a v -
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:s7F poS-03of ISSUE DATE: /o/V/f'/ REV.: O
TITLE: MPcs Afo, c o = & lil., a m A Pm' - F/,,a 7Jr *
' '
YES @ ng%s%gp
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v'
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
/
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
V
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: fr.& sb 747 de.s- hd /nclde TfI ru uired
AJS 4 %eb 0 EA.. b r.J.q s.
'
-
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7
lt(,3 Pr.e . s-f en 7.S 7 w. wet < o rm 4. TS C rguiremeb;f (Licceseg
U
CF4cf 9recekset)
INSPECTOR (S): 3 . L D u h ..s
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/ 8$~- 35 PAGE NO.: /&~l67
9
_ _
_
.
*
TECHNICAL' SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 9.5 /.c _ PAGE NO.: 3/4 5 t/
TS RE UIREMENT: I,k,N.dN4,*2 1 T D 4 d 4 d Y ,#,,8o'fesTjfjO/
Yn .$h Y?Ykh$EY:blb.$kTO?I,$r eS$$$$a$.
AJE A4MA of caoWt m% h reache-versd t 3 he excIW fr.. Mr.r t%f.
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:57F JoF-04,o/ ISSUE DATE: b r.ff REV.: heff-
TITLE: hiden TT Eccr Awud Lid Fo. c4&J %st
YES @ AY wro
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v
V
is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
m
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
.
INSPECTOR (S): D.L. D3e c.s
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
. INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ [E- 36 PAGE N0.: k-/G 7
)
.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: V. F. /. C PAGE NO.: 3/y 5-y
Fe 4Le LPcc,L.Per sJ tttCS
htdc sten',_,at f*'~'8'***N's
-+, e.terst ene*L;L me LA.c %J.lJ
TS REQUIREMENT: rv.w ~ n, et.
'b .T C"? ["5 Nd bfb"N oII*'.W+d*C1*d'U..T'C*c'N It's$~dr'bt
p.s.t..
e. .
. m.te
4:c +.<ig
-
.ct... .t- <. i 4 .do w rout.* u-n. i my be e=c ta=d
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: STP ;Lo5'- 06cf ISSUE DATE: br h- REV.: bedt
TITLE: D2 den I Eccc nf.~.S L;f d.h Fuwej.ed Test
YES NO. g7awso
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? r
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
A
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
INSPECTOR (S): b .L. h M ,r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
1 INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PT- 35 PAGE N0.: 4-1G1
!I
i
__ __
._
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET I
TS PARA: 4. F. /. c PAGE NO.: 3/e/ f-y
TS REQUIREMENT: G. . s r.ou.r.
"
d or.o..-stu dd.d C.,
'
4. E. I . c U
r. t . paa.
,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: Trefo9.o6of ISSUE DATE: N/2 7/fy REV. : O
TITLE: br 3 Lect of ossde 8. o .e / E cc r A c i di m
' '
YES 0
N_0 arY[ws
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
/
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that.it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
A
STATUS OF ITEM GPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
_
INSPECTOR (S): D. L Dulo c 3
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ <f!T-36 PAGE N0.: k-IJo
.I
.
- - _ - - . _ . - - _.
,. , . . . - _____ - .-
_ ,
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4/.5'. /. c/ PAGE NO.: 2/v 5' 8/
TS REQUIREMENT: Y. kD4["EfL MNU*rC88Idi 7 $_ e
t'f t* hlff"l?d"tc 9.Yhlf'97ddd YJM*N/Ll*IA
w.w .Macaj're.stse t en Am.che V=ss4 i Mer 4e.4 ( L t.!o M , tedei 2 .
8
r
'
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:syp.163-06eA ISSUE DATE: /o/v//F REV.: O
TITLE: #Pcs Lf,en 7%rfer- ~
YES g d,.6, ,,j _
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should / *
,
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
M
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSE
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
INSPECTOR (S): D. L . Oor's
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ [S'- 2 6 PAGE NO.: A-f7/
)
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y.r. /. e . I PAGE N0.: 3/v 5-E
TS REQUIREMENT: As Ab s - P.cforg,'- , ru stem E .c4 . 0.L s o A.;L ,,,, L.t.c
c,-..tkhad L a M an AL ad 4L,a ,L.1f 'd, --rw.m ,,, , al .
. t,J ,=cLE n1J vie .ek.6 .
'
' '
r__ . .
LICSPROCEDURENO.: 'A1/4 ISSUE DATE: Al/A. REV.: M/h
TITLE: N,/A '
YES N_0 ~
gl[g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? r
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
-
/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: "Ik'. s Teden mi ree ceb 6 obr AMC en so.dr5 '
S
Aas Mr e wspech .
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): 1. L. D a3ei.s
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED l
REMARKS: f
l
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ #E-3f PAGE NO.: k-/7 .t
.,
_ _ _ . . . . _ . _ _ _ . _ . .
, - .
-
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 5~./. 1 , PAGE No.: 3/4 5'-T
REQU,IREMEN #1"1h. ijffu"M$ .d.btgnjr.%N+5ig$$ef*M
r
k
T(J"358}:*difi%-$fJdddI%*"AYR".
*
. .
"A*'eMc,T&*Mr- '
c3 o .L % L :w.as.t.i, A A A.mt 7,e - .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:sm Ja[-odea_. ISSUE DATE: O/Es
'
REY.: O
TITLE: Ahs klo e. o. eel bb
'
O YES NO AST-
-
Arosswa
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? :-
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or - V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS n Erot. T.de 7 elee.r nei t e.d TE. sh.cf.m f.5"./. a. 2. c.
s an Arwde (c e.okee cedarm eschA. . O Ped e_
se k n eleas a+ & r M ri. su h w '4.s.I.x.1.c
r uA 4.5.1. e . 2. Ar- o % ANAL.D ace pGe e nkar .
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS" WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
I44 _ Mw< s e < myrt coueet y nnedm a speake d ,
l
INSPECTOR (S): h.L. b h 3
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
,
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
l
'
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
!. INSPECTOR (S):
l INSPECTI0h REPORT 50-458/ 85-36 PAGE NO.: A~/73
_
- . - _ _ - . -_ .- - . -
'
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET $
TS PARA: 45. .p. . / PAGE NO.: $ / 4 E '7
TS REQUIREMENT: At le=rf tk. aloeoe r.m. . Jul EcrS s L(I 4. J.% r/r.l.c/
C.rae AGt A u g n meed 4. ET. I
OPER AQLE y-r
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: aos Yl[aos ISSUE DATE: 3/M/Tr5 REY.: O
TITLE: HPcs Ah,AalDb.e F;ti vel \laise $sa fn Ue$,id<*
' '
YES g gN,b.J
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? P'
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or L/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that.it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
_
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): b.L. D 2 a.3
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8 5- 3 5 PAGE NO.: A -l 7 Y
. - .
.__ _
r
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: V5~3.I PAGE NO.: 3/4 E-7
TS REQUIREMENT:
At leasf 4k, abooe raa.M EccI cLif L. J -nsr.4<l
OAFAAdLE a .Curvel(wa- k-- ire d 4/ 5 /
< 0
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: aovoS o/ Y ISSUE DATE: n/#/N
'
REV.: O
TITLE: L9cr R. . ,. F 1 a T-r f r
YES g gNeg
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? #
REMARKS:
e
STATUS OF ITEM ,0 PEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7
.
INSPECTOR (S): D.L D Mat _r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ /E'-SF PAGE NO.: h-4? f
I
-
,
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: N'. f. G . / PAGE N0.: 3/+' 5-7
TS REQUIREMENT: A+ /earf -M. *beoe. ceeu.r.J Ea:s r4.II 6 d.moabf.J
OPwas e n- a- Cram tlaae R.-.. re 3 M 5*. l
. t D
# C
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: a[s- ome / ISSUE DATE: /o/5~/PV REV.:
TITLE: LPc.r R A,y t_.Mor- Ell d Wlve fes,-/, \/e r. /edc h
YES N0 ~g,%g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
,
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should t/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: fr.Aost erebb~ koe e k.)
'
ew b M Skeet ~
tis.l.a.l.
e
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
INSPECTOR (S): D. L. D d ac.S
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N0,
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8 f .?. S PAGE NO.: k-171,
,
. ._ -. ._. . - -__ - - _ ____ - .
.
"
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: V. f. 3 . I PAGE NO.: 3/t/ 5- 7
TS REQUIREMENT: A+ /ust 4, aleo. roo% ,cel Eccf r/u// de d .* eury
'
= <l
oPERAGLE nou-
'
Tur-0.N suee $ wure w=N V 5~ f
.
b
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: SrP do'/-o6c/ ISSUE DATE: brdt REV.: b,.df
TITLE: b',J.r,*.n T Ecc ( Mawu.O rdd & Fumebd Te ct
YES M gl3[Q
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v
Is installed system consistent with TS? v
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or L/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should If
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
A
STATUS OF ITEM ,0 PEN [ CLOSED
\
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
INSPECTOR (S): D . L , Dula c.s
!
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8 f- S S PAGE N0.: A -I? ?
--- .- - . - - .. __ - __ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
1
TS PARA: V. E. J . / PAGE NO.: 3/v 5%'7
'
TS REQUIREMENT: A +- I. arf M. aLV= reu...r.d Fcc f rla // 4e el. ua arir* bl
ePEAMLE o.r L ee.dl m e L. I< r .
'
45.I
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: Jos - otoo / ISSUE DATE: h,Jf REV.: g,*-[f
TITLE: _hei<siem3' Eccr LuA LA<<b.m Vuve % 0*T:st
YES g , ,%,4
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? - v
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
-Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
A
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S):
3 . L. b 2 .,s_
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N.0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FF .75" PAGE NO.: A 'lT8
,
i
l
. . . ._
_ _
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M 6. d.1 PAGE NO.: 3/5/ 6~- 7
TS REQUIREMENT: T1. , #pcc;, n rf m sLl( (.e Jder.,uw 3 oNAdt4E d le.=3t
2 CE 2h"L'%13222%2't?2*"b& J2:'%b7f J:M'"* *(**c
_ s L 1.g.2. . T^c. L A s+.cma ut L-st iat e=e%d. Ot 's ")3
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: sge/ ISSUE DATE: Wat//f'/ REV.: O
TITLE: k k N r.d a Leo s
J b M .j-/6 P3 ' (o7 'e f 8 7 YES M M8 tad *4
Is there any difference betweei: FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (tetual or -
_/ '
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS Acaduce C c k e r k M c- Tte.u. 2 -/ (, .m /,7 d F7, '
as eerk.s ches we e.Jerm b +Le 4. Y. c.oire-e.4 "
L oo c .I 5 .
,
-
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
h CLOSED
,
l'iS L taene h asy. md we bracedm/treknhal suafh<W
' '
cm Hi'&
INSPECTOR (S): D. L. bdir
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
'
- Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED ,
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5-35 PAGE NO.: k-/79
_.
. _. - . _ - _ _ - - . - . - . . - .. __ _ _ - - . . - . - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ -
. _ _ .
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M f.J.l A ' PAGE NO.: 3/V 6 9
TS REQUIREMENT: 19 lo " a.f /.asf eace o. r- D'/ A.ur:r , i k
'
'
OPEtAThe4 AL CoobmoM l , A 4- ~3 .
C aw.sc,b A /
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: sre.oeo- ocer ISSUE DATE: Tr/p'//PV REV.: O
TITLE: hk a.ed's L 1
%d i 'Pb d [2 3p AS %7
9
YES M gT )
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or - V
editorial)?
'
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS
m
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS" WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7 .
i
INSPECTOR (S): D . L . h 2 oid
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NJO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems ident'ified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED ,
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ P5 '3E PAGE NO.: h-f 70
-.
'
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: //. E. 2. /. lr PAGE NO.: 8/4 E-9
TS REQUIREMENT: /2 ' 2" M /earf once se r- /JL ber ,, ' ops 4A7iadM.
Codbl7 sed 4 ad F.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: sTp Am.-mo/ ISSUE DATE: FAw/f9 REV.: C
TITLE: D=l* Omerd h' L. .s '
% E-li
'
YES NO ?p*p$ywo_
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? t/
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: -
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
. INSPECTOR (S): D. L. Mo t s
FOLLOWUP _ ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 88- 2 5 PAGE N0.: k -if I
r- 1
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4/. 5'. 3 p. PAGE NO.: 3/Y 5'-?
TS REQUIREMENT: W41+L.em -,rch om/ I d / ,er / / t h - I c a e /; ",/ e r
de,.al ,L O*fAA7mHL cmbtNen # V d A-st onee s.e /2 hw es t a ) verd - '
L hewr.bc d kaae,$ L. sea n 2.5'. 2. .A- A. L. s J . r C . J , o c - ' '.
LIC. PkOCEDURE NO. : frB ooo - coo r ISSUE DATE: f/oWPy '
REV.: O
TITLE: Delu Oo .:k.4 Loor
' ' '
If- m ' M/7 YES NO g@,54
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v
Is installed system consistent with TS? "
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or v
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / -
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: T. S . CMm 4 5 1 9- . Jr is ni.'ss.' % . This eroM.m'
it ,AJA.h .. pr-o a s e.e,.a bA._ Ed .
_
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
!
INSPECTOR (S): D.L.lulola
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSE0
- REMARKS
l
"
l INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 85~ T K PAGE NO.: k-f 7.L
ll
l
l
_ -
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _. .
.
"
c, TECHNICAL' SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: M. 6. I. E PAGE NO.: 3/V 4-2-
TS REQUIREMENT: t/E RI F V cowpr4/mevr /drede/ r Y Pre. rH6
sPrea c&h FRecacalerac-s.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:sn-coo- ozo/ ISSUE DATE: 1////85~ REV.: O
TITLE: Mer/THLY 0 PGR A Tl6/C, LOGS
'
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? MOT VCAf firD
Is installed system consistent with TS? NoT VEAI FIO
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial} X
~ Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should NOT VERIFIEb
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdewn? >(
REMARKS: THe~ PRoce.htiaE 30ES NoY ADDRESS 7WG"
2FD L)ti?Eh1EA/ TS 0F TECH. S PEC. 4 ,lo. l. 2. ; sw o n e c u er R. ,
rHs- PRoes-hdRE is E kse-h oN pro w r H L Y itsetreriod.s
'
NOT /A/Sf'EcTresis ErdutReb McE ~P c t 8 Se /0 } Mots
(f. E . cA/6E~ ?ER S HI P T') .
h
'
STATUS'0F ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
l4F TM MPLic A AIT SN00110 PRO VI DG' AbI A PPROPR u A TE ] *VR'O A '
117 PRCcEbo e 6~ PRIOR 70 INIT> A L FL/CL/A/G. A LS o&HC
ISSUA *
A P P L ic.h M T swsr M k *i. h-r t A's * T O THE PKoc Eh v R.E'.
~
INSPECTOR (S): }AL6 A. ~f0WERS
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/-
YES f@
Were problems corrected? .I
i
Were any other problems identified?
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-3J PAGE NO.: A -lFJ
1
,
e
:(
* *
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
( )TSPARA:
Y, ,[ 4 PAGE NO.: 3 [ hl
TS-REQUI.R ENT:
fA yr k (L ]bi. m .-/ U n d - (14 % Y
Y).A s ia su tYr lYY yy &1E mi W' -W
-
-
yv y- '
-
yy
'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 87f-off),jS U DATE: / lot ,sGpc[ REV. :
TITLE: / nca l Leok 8dp we
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /l/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? d/d 7
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or //
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? d '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should F'
work as written?
?
Haslicenseecompgltedprocedurewalkdown?
REMARKS: N'
V' l'0fftbi rP IM b \/# h (pr.* N P a t
/
p)
t
U
.
-
_
,
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
i
I4Y { Of he u s1 1? m e l?bf aff Pf bci t o lO cif/P9b l
'
'HA1n I%ek k '
'
INSPECTOR (S): farfr // l
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ j
YES fLO
l
l Were problems corrected? .
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS: l
l
i
'
INSPECTOR (S):
U INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5 - 3 5 PAGE NO.: d-IF t/
!
l
l a
-
r
*
f
.' . TECHNICAL SPECIEICATION REVIEr DATA SHEET
, PARA: fi[ / / PAGE NO.: 3N dd
a REQUIREMENT:
fr."norv do, ,%;s n ,.,,/ L /m c ,'/ v ppe,a}&,/,94
'
-
/Pe b h -/ ,o e} , * ., e
c)
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: /)S~% 2f0/ ISSUE DATE: /v/e f ,'sfqg [V. : .
TITLE: Na bC lr a d fkea k Pa k rq& ~Tpr +
# '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
M[
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? Y '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
REMARKS: fm&r 6'r f EJo / Wf o$t% \// /.
'
/
_
-
_
#
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
L11 b {lf -
m, v G f <T# tste m &
y
h(WP ufP
v
INSPECTOR (S): '
[o N #//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
_N_0
W:re problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
T.SPECTOR(S):
['kM SPECTION REPORT 50-458/ P f- M
PAGE NO.: 4-lgf
1
L
,
,
*
.
} TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIE'n' DATA SHEET
'~~l PARA: 4.d, /. / PAGE NO.- 3 [
x Madu / hj d>g- y
ba
'
5 REQUIREMENT:hx602'nds "O
. .
y
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 0f/)-370d' ISSUE DATE: /VA REV.:
TITLE: Ex&> c,crn Ai-//~c z eaki>>te res-t
'
' '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? h
Is installed system consistent with TS? ///
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? Y '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee mpleted procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: $ (CX W riGb ld/l$r'/t.
_
-
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT DY WHEN?
LSO hfk w//$t"r /)l'cicPckr&/
/c9'" f$ '
INSPECTOR (S): Forre//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ .
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? _
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
[\' 'TSPECTOR(S):
.NSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ S5-55 PAGE NO.: h-f f (
r.
T
,
.' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEk DATA SHEET
' l PARA: Y, d - PAGE NO - [ d2
w.bREQUIREMENT:f r /$ N) $ A:$. #f)As b j,)
b , 30 < rYi, 00
c/
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 6T 9-3R$3 ISSUE DATE: /L/M- REV.:
TITLE: $lPr-tr,la l fe'uefro Nem IPo b rg /r' 7PS$
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? h
Is installed system consistent with TS? ,M/
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? f '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #
work as written?
Has licensee c pleted ocedure walkdown?
REMARKS: k /kh"R/u/ # /oc> [ Y / [ tu r /7fh"e .
_
-
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
f(cY(t: uf$
'
\$l $, 04
-
11&cl3 tutn$e%f
y
INSPECTOR (S): [OT/t [/
#
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
W;re problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM .
OPEN CLOSED
REttARKS:
'
/"'~:SPECTOR(S):
t ?
~.;$PECTION REPORT 50-458/ p J-U PAGE NO.: A-l P 7
_ . ~ . . . . . . . .
.
..
..
J
> .
< q
.
.
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: L/. 6. l. l 6 PAGE NO.: 3/46-l
TS REQUIREMENT: Primary Containgcof In feerify civsed valve
' '
verificefici,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 57f 000-cas! ISSUE DATE: I/st/FS REV.: O
TITLE: donf h f,y Orersfiny Loes *
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? 6ft
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
-
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
[/t
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
l work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: (o Doohle ask<isk no+e & bonom of +eek stee nc.e 3/v C-f
'
+ni ks ., F va tvis ails tel, a re " sn side the wrimary ron&Ntar ,eN s F sFear>,
4vnnel or dry,, ell... H Drywell ic redshnt it 4LY Ar,well is una,Ir ne
'
~
netwr cedoinmmf CaYWoft on pane it refen +c feek suec '/.G.I.l. 2n
'bol s%,lA refte fu 'f. G. I. A. a 'd) Perroella+v s+uted 're We " see co,,%+1m
O
' '
'
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
(Sa- G) NILL m& resolve tedseher
' jf) @ LILenste inv0 curveth cruce Esat GT) Listaseemustkoke.4 fesodieH y reyx.h olTS
- lPf 9 Licensee wF r<seloe 75/proced s<r ca, Flref-
INSPECTOR (S): Furre Il
FOLLOWUP. ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? :
~
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ fS- U PAGE NO.: A -I P 9
.
---
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
, -
r 7
,
.'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
l TS PARA: % s. l.I,8 PAGE NO.: 3 /Y 6-1
!
l ftema rks . on rete 17 ts ona oc.- 31 Ayr 6mr fie teck s e
once- W Shi
reAus're) fen'edteiG is
.
@ Nok on n,e 18 y, ears +0 sncorreefly r~rlemeod teek
'
Spers VG, I.I ard % 6.I,1. .
@ Valws iS As-Yyr4 4d Invp-ysva are Iisfeel r, the t<t.,le .
oF ca dignmen+ Tsola% valves o,t pu,e A O o F lhe r re **lart > A*to y
I.'sted as drywell ba la% wives s% Ta ble 3. S. V -I of
teck stecs
.
_
.
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-43t/ PS-7S PAGE N0.: A-l? 9
- - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - -- - -J
.
: 4
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
i
TS PARA: M, l.1 C PAGE NO.: .3/9 6 -l
TS REQUIREMENT: fr-i m a g Co n fe i n men f- Inft.ri h - Au to c k
,
Per/Fh4/m
l
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STr os? 731 ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE:
"
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V[A
Is installed system consistent with TS? 7+
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or , /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? % '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V/g
work ss written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: fro Ledon I<> In dre f f And is he frim sy y
#
Costainaeaf Inf esmfe/ Leak Rede Tesf
STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
l55 Licfnse t h as h t s sue. % pre ve$ wn lled clow^ b roceda rt
FF / F
INSPECTOR (S): FarreIl
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected? :
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ &S-35 PAGE NO.: A -l 70
. ;*
,
'
.' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
/ ~~1 PARA: I.d. /r PAGE N .: 3N h1 ,
obREQUIREMEtT: fn, u k M , E -[ d[/ h m ,m
-
k n YN/$i., lh W
i u
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 600-de / ISSUE DATE: PMYhY REV.: O
TITLE: })cti f t/ () DPrcs fln 4 for;
U
'
'
(/
~
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M//).
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: 3 /"f" /1# A m e n [9 ver N, f,d.3.[
_
_
STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
INSPECTOR (S): fu rre ll _
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
"
[^'"SPECTOR(S):
b/NSPECTIONREPORT 50-458/ 8 5- 35 PAGE N0.: ,t-(9/
1
, p
.
'
-
'
TF.;HriiCAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
T ~~l PARA: Ye[ /n2 PAGE NO.: 3 -d
_ j REQUIREM NT: 8,,,Eu df ,,' .-/d N g[ d [
i / h $--
-
e.L,, l0 0
,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 8@-Co?o/ ISSUE DATE: t//thf REV.: o
TITLE: donMN Opr>JN. Lv4:
*
I I ,
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Ff
Is installed system consistent with TS? F//}.
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should , //A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: SN 8# m M 8n[S o t, T f. 4.L/,/E
_
-
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): fa tre if
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
l' ZSPECTOR(S):
's- d5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5 -Jf PAGE N0.: 44 9A
. .,
.' -
'
TECriNICAL SPECIFI~.ATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'
f'~"1 PARA: Y, [, /e 7 PAGE NO.: .
,Y 7.
. REQUIREMENT: [h u dd_2_ -/ M[ />f If
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: , , _
TSSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE:
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licen ce completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: i ), .o /Dto recbre hof lh &c n//fc/ /po k /b &
-
h c+ h e S T l'- C C h 3!)0 3 O s- n c/r'a /f Nt'.m,
T/, : c W,'c in o + Poe < e eru pad'a / c, c t& n ex &
r'$ h
_
_
/srNernl N
_
. /#c l // M s 's nofrerci/rp/
Se l' W- 4- vA>t'S C$hsevnw l 7W a /M /< ea u ;E he s '
# #
PEN CLOSED
##
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WH Y WHEN?
I$h & Lt'Leossee etvsf ic ut b ro eed of 9 9 Ytb $h r1ex $ >tocin) tesf
IS? @ Li'unut swd- rssd aserend 'w<Iked Aom" stod4m1 orter h
' "
Fvedlos4
INSPECTOR (S): Nrred
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0,
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problcr.s identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
( '}SPECTOR(S):
\ -dNSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ M-75
- PAGE NO.: A -/ 9 3
i
'
. ?
.
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
,-
V [<[. /, 3 PAGE NO.: <3/y68/
.
TS PARA:
21d411 w muA ZAmAm 8
As ' !t" O d no d lA
o e,as sl Y& b med > <r GrwnA
lsdAs T1 w A c u s,t /.4/ J7
'
esllNJ-l "
'F'
a/A .d:' 7
+O. ~
.
'
KT ,
t
< :)
.
**
. .: t
_
-
-
- - it ..
(/
.
!
4
.
- -
G
_.
M
l
__
" - . _ . .
O *
.
C) -
'
.,
PAGE NO.: A-/9 y
INSPECTION REPORT 50-457/ 3 5-3 1
', j TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
S PARA: , /. PAGE NO.: d-
hr s'rmn 4 $ s ho i n .,, +,-) ) IY lne k_
'
REQUIREMENT: ~
. C o b < a I,: 1.' l a ~-- $ ea l Lenkcee Trsf
e
-
f
7 0
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: dI 9 '>'M ISSUE DATE: /////8S'REV. : O
TITLE: ft ~u y fo r folw{ ); vbrk $ft,/ /kkoe P ltSh
' '
Y YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M//r
Is installed system consistent with TS? F//t
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should gg
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? h
REMARKS: 0 Y 1hsus,J A /2.% sass (,, 1 ) / T M J/
b Yib k)b ki ks++m- nou '
N,. a,/ n,, /,+ c *3
4,
i
n orbsA-~ ' e < ,M
/
.~ / c ,-
/
s,,.,-4,
-
h }brWW f /2/3'h Y &f or b6' D
STATUS OF ITEM [0 PEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WH WHEN? "
l$$ @ Lhensee pt J3 4:'. resc(*e TS fpre c.cdort un ff L f'
Is1 G912censo es F defen'an' bash for woWa triWrco
10 @ Lrcensee mus V issve errevel, walkd jou v enedm '
INSPECTOR (S): Furre#
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? 4
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
!SPECTOR(S):
-l
['~]ESPECTION
C REPORT 50-458/ PAGE #f-35
NO.: A -l(/f
* ' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
,
.
_TS PARA: Y.[, /. f h- PMC NO.: 3/Y (-T
( ', REQU EM T: h&u (hnr2 L) R,${brYkunff~
' ~~
x o .f<h(J Tw/ -
, - ,
7
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: dd- Df-ISSUE DATE: 7- F ff~iiEV.: O
TITLE: 44 a/b ~
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? F/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? #fg
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or y
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee pl ed pr edure walkdo n? A
REMARKS:h /J.,#46 I ' ' I G hr
W 4 $ /2 h s t / M f? lb AmMn
'
S
O Y
@ 7 61.f d s L K/
. , - s A,
si n .
IfI j [
STATUS OF ITEM PN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 W BY WHEN? '
lbf CC l.Zeest See Mos f' Y toff entit "I kTBn r
%L & LI&ste h as f Lou'tYL[ Protebdvt
INSPECTOR (S): hreck
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES y
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
(']NSPECTOR(S):'
( i NSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8 s -35 PAGE NO.: h-I96
-I
.
( TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
1
.
TS PARA: 8d, / h d PAGE NO.: .3/y 6-'1
(\s 3 AEQU REP iT:/) k h w Nuj_ .,/ z2My - -
m
, } ' g g ,jr
y I
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: OS U-dfCJ. ISSUE DATE: / .24-f[iiEV. : O '
TITLE: I aNa# '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //A
Is installed system consistent with TS? //A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should A/'A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure 1kdown? /t
wu.YA Phs),9 A.
,b h m,-
REMARKS: s h ,
y-
-
-
9
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS" WHO MUST D0 WHA Y WHEN?
10 -
, .'HG I E F f ,OR~'/V^ . GVP -
(WUd itt
INSPECTOR (S): N rrel/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
( 7 NSPECTOR(S):
' v lN5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ F f -3 f
'
PAGE NO.: A-/97
i
', TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
[.
_TS PARA: N d, /, I P GE NO.: 3/y 6-f
f ) REQUIREMENT: // n > a24 / 4 Arm,s m 4,1
v AA2x v e
wa A -
c/
'
r
-
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: OcC ~d/1/ ISSUE DATE: /.J -Jo ;P/tEV. : O
TITLE: %, hY /1)/)dn,WN. h
jY Y [ '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? F/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should I[4
work as written?
Has licensee completed p cedu e walkdown? [/t
REMARKS: @ //M b 1/ [
, A/-(
_
,
y .
-
Ts
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHA BY WHEN7
16'l 0 Uttotset $10 h D 6't HroveY , valNe$ Aown ,DrocYbJvt
INSPECTOR (S): F= rrell
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
(~}SPECTOR(S):
C':SPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7f-35 PAGE N0.: h-IT)?
l
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION F.EVIEW DATA SHEET
.
,
[.
_TS PARA: Y,d./,Y,[2 PAGE NO.: 3[y 6 -h
I iREQUIR[f1ENT,f 8Ad7z [ //##M [,,en
'4 Ga Juten AJ %d- ~V
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: d r') 6 M ISSUE DATE: 42-JP-94- REV. : O
TITLE:
'
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
jffg
Is installed system consistent with TS? pff
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
D:es procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //A
work as written?
Has licensee comp eted procedu walkdown? y
- ,fM
,$EMARKS:. /M /J44 4/w/ . w Ad[ 4, [. /.f
^Wr aM*/ 7MJ ik,fh /ze A s A ! -
(6Tnfl Ab; seAn a, ~ aels 4 0d w A s
'
A b kewbN$~D
-
SmYbYA, AhYut9
-
STATUS OF ITEM O CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT,BY WHEN? '
lbj @ Idtl21ct m aSf coYrek \1ech spec ft fi*ter.e f
la D Lta mee am+ co<m+
INSPECTOR (S):
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
(~~1NSPECTOR(S):
C INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5-3 5 PAGE N0.: h-/91
_
', '. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
_TS PARA: M, [,4N PAGE NO.: 3 ~~/O
) REQUIREMENT: M $ [ // 2.roIocta [o n hv / 6/pefv,/,/,fy'
'w.J () ' f
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: /900-dct7/ ISSUE DATE: P / n /t y REV.: O
TITLE: Ocd lv ove*4/1b* los*'<
r .
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SEN and TS? f/'g
Is installed system consistent with TS? /v/+
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdo ? 4
REMARKS: A o // T. , h, ,
/, ! c r3 n, , ,. h
y .
_
_
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO, MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7 ,
INSPECTOR (S): Fart //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
"'
TNSPECTOR(S):
t
( ,bSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Tf-33 PAGE NO.: h-d Oo
,1
m
.
,
>
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHLET
TS PARA: 4, d, / f.h PpE'
3/94-/O
l ) REQUIREMENT: #on /4 b/ gmAjL : -/yM c/
#
^<
, AC/U ,h/ h T --
- ,
sWN2 . .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ho.,,o / /u ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE:
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/4
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? ,
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should _
work as written? /
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? I
REMARKS: ,#/ o crWAA C2,/ -
~"
6, a % &J
,
-
'g /
-
' CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
l 167 0 Lhen ste .mut+ itsue enuved' . alls el be s rhe
'
o le vre
I milem e,, %7 Ts
l INSPECTOR (S): 6 rrc//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
(ES NO ,
Ware problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
l
f^1NSPECTOR(S): '
f :5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 J -31 PAGE NO.: A->0l
1
l
*
,
', TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,_TS PARA: fi[. /IC PAGE NO.: 3/y 6-/d
( ) REQUIREMENT: Ave /# AIT- [#[ $ $ rValveS r+
(; ^
-
'
. ;
-
- ~
- - . . . . ~ , , . ,
,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ,dof-/)@
ISJU
DATE /)-7-ff REV - O
TITLE: /fS/// lYhf 0
b?1W $dY:J htfu b 9 .d
f* Q' y
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //A
Is installed system consistent with TS? M/4 ,
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? j '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should gg
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? p
REMARKS Q. ( A .o s u. A
- -
f)h/vD p ,,
- .
&Mwf
_
_
STATUS OF ITEM
(h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
Iby ~ - blickW me5h hY&O < rl
l
( y
INSPECTOR (S): F <re#
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
"
/~NSPECTOR(S):
l 1
\j;5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ PI-3J PAGE NO.: A -Jo ,L
i
* ' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,
,
.
-
,TS PARA: M, d. 47 PAGE NO.: 3/V 4 -/O
; )
Q , REQUIREMENT:
[Md Jh/ j#9///- [2 6 '
(/
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: jog-d(4f ISSUE DATE: , / - $-Trf EV. : O
TITLE: A 4 / I [seid4# d h#u A M / 7/
" ' M/A -
"
W jj
'
YES _N_O.
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //A
'
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
D:es procedure carry out TS requirement? .
*
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completgd proegre walkdown? h
REMARKS: [ / /V / //
-
TM"V, ll RrMwT .
' -
/ m
// ]
STATUS OF ITEM [0 PEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MVS DO Wh4T B ~
HEN?
'
ts7 D Uamee nos+ rss ue afr rove) , wa lla) M yroah,,
INSPECTOR (S): Rrre//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified 7 i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'~
/~'NSPECTOR(S):
I
( ,i25PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-35 PAGE NO.: Ar-}03
1
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,
-
.'
*
TS PARA: Y, [, [ [ PAGE NO.: MY f -//
( ) REQUIREMENT: fr,%ctr\/ b., lcis nstparf 3/r'ceM dro l
'
'4 M xr,19v,w f
'
(/ /
L s e c eo.+
<
LIC. PROC DU E NO.: d f Q -3 h d ISS E D TE: ,Q -J o ,9 I REV.: f)
3M
~
TITLE: [ LSw] b d -
'
8[ ~
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /[
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
vork as written? /
Haslicenseecompletedpgocedurewalkdown? \/
REMARKS: AhMetK2thl) -
Y-
^
I ~n sR.f, , s ,
47 hwwuz# 21D TILnf ;p
A Lf c{ns asi.
; y
-
t "
Xl
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
INSPECTOR (S):
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES _NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
' '
('i:SPECTOR(S):
.
b_'NSPECTIONREPORT50-458/ PAGE N0.: A 40Y
-
, ,', TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,_JS PARA: M,[, / k PAGE NO.: 3 [i-/c2
[ jREQUIREM T: [Aust eu din _ / 'M- hg
'M y
~
eg jf jf Q4
~
G
-
r ,
LIC.PR0]DUR
0.: S M -ddO/ ISSUE DATE: @U ,f()- REV. :
'
C
TITLE: A/r ' /2 $a_ ~
h
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //A
Is installed system consistent with TS? %
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //4
work as written?
Has licensee comple ed procedure alkdown? IM
REMARKS I // fn u e n
,b Y A./Zf.
f
$ . 0 [b &Js hobh t~<>9 Sh xYA-
~
AFGol
b iLdGd
^
2 % LL
~g /
~
_
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPk CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DG W Y WHEN?
*
no O Lreemee most resolve TS /procedurt ck Href
G{ @ L.heate nosV Corrtef prot.eN der
INSPECTOR (S): Fnrre#
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected!
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
! /~C;SPECTOR(S): '
i 5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS- 3f PAGE NO.: h 4 0_.f
.I
i
i
*
, '. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: fe[ k PAGE NO.: T hO
kMm , . -/ dweg ga :
(J" gQUIREMENT-mdi Msh, an f+ & a l
'
r cr -
l
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: dO-av/ ISSUE DATE: F4vhv REV.: O
TITLE: Oni) Ofe+8rh',t4 JEJy r
.
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #fff
Is installed system consistent with TS? $
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should $
work as written?
'Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [jf
REMARKS: h,Mw/MW tr [<f- .
O
-
A _ , k
O %2e l- 9 5 /ineds Ln r c i s ,,.
'
O aadin/MS L%,aA.s A w AA;As '
4L tvHaudst% '
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM 7 [ 0 PEN
FOR "0 PENS", WH0_ MUST D0' WHA BY WHEN?
'
l13 0 L5CCastt MVst issue a.pproved, Usikel dJeun Pro cchiet
'
i1) & Littata n'osf unetV sac Is!W
INSPECTOR (S): far'* //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
.
YES N0
'
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
-
REMARKS:
{'];SPECTOR(S):
(JSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ff-if PAGE NO.: 4-Adf
:)
i
- . _ _ _ - , . _ _ _ _ --
_ ___ - . _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . _ _ - . _ . _
r -
., s. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
_TS PARA: I [,/ f d PAGE NO.: '3 -- / .
[ ) REQUIREMENT: [h [ [gup I < 3:?ge,
ACDsep E u r v Y C u o n l V a ,, ) P Y lYe ( 5 $ / q ltA O 9 $m/pc
's toced .' n% A lv ' ' '
\
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.# : 066-Odo/ ISSUE DATE: / - 1/-9( REV.: O
TITLE: Float ((v operahm (de r
i a i i .
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should p/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? 8//t
REMARKS (i)Ush' k0 lk of n roYce rf hoc wro v qiyesL ( p
_ q r, 6 .m A f t S. t 6! /.12. e ; v' ~'
'
h /n,eKlu(f c'S st o h a / / M'f /D
~ ' add n-ss -r 7,
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
OLQ Licensec. un i veulve ~r$/ prociclere con Fir'ef
l (75 @) (Ztenste AJO iMVC ervce& tukTch ad)te.nes D
l
INSPECTOR (S): fi<rre//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES _N0
Were problems corrected?
l
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
*'
l Q:SPECTOR(S):
ll (.,_d5PECTIONREPORT 50-458/ 8f-31 PAGE NO.: h- A0 7
i
i
1
!
l
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.- .'-
PARA: 4,[, /. ,M PAGE NO.: 3
REQUIREMENT:
b p fft nlu f fc, a, et /ofibe f.% e (% fe, /,,,, ,f
,DufC - P
verfur n opps ,
~ c b P v'P/ y D Wct VS
, ,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 400-mo/ ISSUE DATE: REV.: O
TITLE: Wr"I// d //9 /o _Q
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
%
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee ompleted procedure walkdown?
REMARKSQi/wrp Off Wi, /c n/ n/WFpcce 3 fro ch
^
CDW
J/ '
_
I OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 W. WHEN7
I1b & l2ttet stf th us $^ I5 G!t ,Yror.al M sdbrY a))resser 'Yeb Syeg
INSPECTOR (S): Enret //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? l
OPEN CLOSED l
STATUS OF ITEM , ,
REMARKS:
'
[^^?SPECTOR(S):
(ISPECTION REPORT 50-458/ [f f *31 PAGE NO.: A-40P I
.!
!
i
!
!
'
, ,' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
J S PARA: Y I I k,3 PAGE NO.: [ d~
/ /t/I
'
b ! REQUIREMENT: [e< [t#
IS/ [$<<*sm Arf P v' t*V,y' h2 es_ r
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: M3- 3D/ ISSUE DATE: 2-/ 9-ff RE . : (7
TITLE: OMur_ / 'v b/ MN. , Ced/
~'
- #
5- f f
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? ,
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has lice e completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS
I
_a in 'Di or h< r ,'S' Ma n C h. 5' 'Yl w/d
Av / m r // // .. > W
t >, w w , n WG f"<nuar
-
aub 'b at" J sc ", A -oK - - ~
1I ,.'
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7 '
07 CO.Gcense e aregIn Ys/ prcackwe cafh'c f
i]] Y l2ceoutt CDvved Pro tea aw r
t7g @ h'AL dderwhe i f M " w<lva need h be hc{vds,I la TS
INSPECTOR (5): Srrolf
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
['7SPECTOR(S):
'wjN5PECTIONREPORT50-458/ U"U PAGE N0.: 4-407
;
'
'
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: I,[,/,/O A PAGE NO.: f ~
(' ) REQUIREMENT:
6pL[ ,F // L C $ Aad,4, pega,w 7 /g//fjg
-
uj y - -
LIC. PROCEDURE 0.: 600-600/ ISSUE DATE: P/Arhv REV.: ()
TITLE: h/ '
dM d
b I [ '
YES 0
N0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ,M a
Is installed system consistent with TS? /4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? M
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //4
work as written?
Has licensee c pleted procedure wa kdown? k
REMARKS: m l' W 0)trch > Mth$t) /) G
5 Ohwolbm D bA h 90kl T$ Jwhinac - 0 E ~~
Ch 7. $. J? hnhr w % l b n~ bA je1}tok
p <
- -
-
_
n
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM (k
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7
l90 0 llLEASR. fiaq!iW Mf 61 Ct/P e corre h prouAvrt
INSPECTOR (S):
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
_N_0_
Were problems corrected?
i
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
/^'NSPECTOR(S):
b NSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8.5 - U PAGE NO.: A -4-l o
I
.
_. _ _._ __ - _ _ ._.
. .
.. .-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 44l.106 PAGE NO.: 3/Y 6 -16
TS REQUIREMENT: Pvic i vo fve Cvcitn.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STP W-Oto ISSUE DATE: 1/h/1Y REV.: 0 '
TITLE: fentfraken Velve Leaks., Gde ( Sysfc - Mrs Operm6;I;4 TPJ1
'
h
~ '
YES
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? FA
Is installed system consistent with TS? r/4 :
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or ./ l
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? F/p
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? //A
REMARKS: O TS referows in p roced urt i3 wnu
@ hil 4Ae valae loca$om a.re irsted a5 * LM&l "
STATUS OF ITEM M CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
'
\8l D Lic.easte mus+ correef procedsve
\fb- @ Licenst.e must (ntoroa Nie "LkTtd s '
,
INSPECTOR (S): Fa rre//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected? :
-
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED l
REMARKS:
l
l
- INSPECTOR (S)
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PJ-3J PAGE NO.: P >ll
:
*
'.
.
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PARA: Mr d, [</8 PAGE NO.: _3 ['/[
REQUIRENENT: .
[l/ L / ( ;
D ,[ 4 M. u [p
-
-
ge
y
-
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: .7f6MS/ISSUGATE: 9 - / -ff REV. : D
~
TITLE:
{} !! L d 5 LD ded _
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /4
Is installed system consistent with TS? 4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or __
/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? //g
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should pg
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedu walkdown? . [4
REMARKS: @.M8vr@/ / # @h d # [ LI g,/
(4 % WhML4 i flhiwntha b ENf
f
_
U U
-
STATUS OF ITEM PEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHA WHEN7 '
\t) CD Liansee mos t- Frsaltre alue avshen
\ff & LILehite must Corret i- ,Proudort
INSPECTOR (S): Farec //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'~
f;;SPECTOR(S):
VNSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ P f-71 PAGE NO.: A- 4 /1
r
'
.
TECHNICAL SPEC;FICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
S PARA: M, d, c2,[ PAGE NO.: '/
REQUI MENT: b)l%xh 0- p//,,, /kah
' "
Dia ch G W L<seN T1fd/dx
/ v /~
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 600~Ost7/ISSUEDATE: /2//~,9 [ REV.: O
TITLE: [OvNrb/ O e5 [cc
'
8 '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Md}
j
I
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? Y
REHARK : YM ar -W cd$hn W l ,, ,s. e>{,uaf
AWL i$ bYW NY, u &c
'
f
7 C , 4 , G, I. /. B
_
1 '
-
6~
o
# CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM 0 PEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7
lys CQ_Lnemte ms+ raulve hffue %% prul,hm behue<; b y ell
a nd Con fainan, ta+ no(ahon ve lvo
INSPECTOR (S): Far< ell
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
{'NSPECTOR(S): PAGE NO.: & 4 13
C NSPECTION REPORT S0-458/ y1.55
1
y A
.
.
..
..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4.6. 2e / 8 PAGE NO.: 3/Y s-I7
TS REQUIREMENT:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: o0 0 - 0101 ISSUE DATE: f a/Go /TV REV.: 0
TITLE: ldeckly Ore lac' '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? Ng
Arc there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should r/'4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [[A
REMARKS: See ceMeedr Fur TS 4 6, a.3
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
INSPECTOR (S): FurreIl
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
:
l Were problems corrected?
!
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/15-3J PAGE N0.: A9/V
1
L
_ _
.
.
,. .-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4.6 2.I C. PAGE NO.: 3/y 6 -/ 7
TS REQUIREMENT:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: CW-000l ISSUE DATE: $'/sy//V REV.: O
TITLE: OniIV Opewhy Lo,g
' '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #[/P
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or ./
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should r/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? #fg
REMARKS: See contacah on TS M,7.1
.
STATUS OF ITEM @D CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
l
INSPECTOR (S): b rre //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected? :
*
Were any other problems identified?
l
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
! REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ M-3C PAGE NO.: A --Alf
- .- .
,
.
. .
.. .
.
: .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET /,
TS PARA: jf.6, L 1. 0. PAGE Nb.: 3/Y s -I T
TS REQUIREMENT:- Drywe #' 6v nst le=ku e -
< ,
,
,
,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: oco -olol ISSUE DATE: '
1 Sho /7Y REV.: O
L TITLE: ls)eekiv dbuaWm, Loes
'
. -
' ' '
YES ! NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? y V/A.
- Is installed system consistent with TS? !
[
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
'
,
' '
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? ,
.
.Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should '
? work as written?
h Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? Y ~
T5
~
REMARKS: St.c Co*vnt.dt, on V, G. L L
, ,
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
,
-
INSPECTOR (S): Pq rr e /l
'
' FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ __
YES M
Were problems corrected? :
'
Were any other problems identified? -
, STATUS OF ITEM OPEN C[,dSED.
s
, J. REMARKS:
'
c.
,
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ IHf PAGE N0.: A-3-/4
.-
_
9
J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
}, }, TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,
I
I M IS PARA: db,[[ PAGE NO.: 7h [W
M/e
~
( 'i REQUIREMENT:
a y.h.c,v,,,
p / / Il//0ck //crA
9 ft% bff l-40., of e49r/ l0 /0 0 /'TI G ~ t/Pr.S/
0 ' '
Ut ek//
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: S1f 000-OIol ' ISSUE DATE: /1 c)O-#REV. : 6
TITLE: //WIb/ /7 /'T /_. o e
! '
[ "
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? #/p.
'
REMARKS:@ 1U l'c') 4 r C erso nfoo// 8 /i / p y .'c1
_
Y l*1 If)/% <- $a /P
/
-
A
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
l 9(p (dLZc6Mte Ihn4- CNM$~ pwtedm
INSPECTOR (S): _ Ftu,eII
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES fiO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
/ NSPECTOR(S):
-INSPECTIONREPORT 50-458/ 7 5-35 PAGE NO.: A - J. ( 7
- _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _
'
'
.
.
'
~
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4. 6. a . l . G. 2. PAGE NO.: 3/Y 4 -/P
TS REQUIREMENT: Orywe ll N<Iuck I'neva..fn svde Leu k Terf
l
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: OC?-5Jof ISSUE DATE: REY.:
TITLE: Orywell k&lvelt (neum hi Syrh m Le d Terf
~
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should Ag/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
'
f87 ( IIcenst C tmd~ i3sut arf tvvtA , walked doLan t rocedort
INSPECTOR (S): Force /l
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? :
*
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/$5-35 PAGE NO.: A-4/P
.-
'
,-
',
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET ,
c "3 PARA: [, <d PAGE NO. 6/7
x_--
) REQUIREMENT: M;
m
h y
,lus
--
I, ,J In ,
v
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: SS-9-XO3 ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE:
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? p/'A
Is installed system consistent with TS? ,
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or ,
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? N
REMARKS: A 4 , s /[ .
@ '$b & dEub$ fafY b bl,: -rg ,
Y l
g- - (;
_ - -
y
_
n
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? '
0 Lite <sut mvS+- hsvt cuprove), c toalle) Acwit 9tedert
9
l1Y
INSPECTOR (S):
'
bu/// '
FOLLOWUP ACTION: I SPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0,
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM .
REMARKS:
'
ISPECTOR(S):
.
(MNSPECTIONREPORT 50-458/ 8 5-7f PAGE N0.: _h df1
'
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.. .-
, 75 PARA: dedid,3 N - GE N : c2/
(m,h REQUIREMENT: ))/Lsz
.
& .y
,S
-
;p A ff j,l y
LIC PROCEDURE NO.: d f D- M O 6 ISSUE DATE: D. -/-Pf REV. : D'
TITLE: If r ,p
,
YES NO
l Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and T5? 4
Is installed system consistent with TS? $
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
D:es procedure carry out TS requirement? //g .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should pfg
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? h
I
REMARKS- o , ko o , j
_
EbrIJ E 2/ WeA ~
-
A h & ) . / ?t 8
~-
'
L Te<A L e ,
v -
-
u
r
STATUS OF ITEM .
EN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHA Y WHEN?
'
19 7 @ Lrevu must ta gwn+< %8TMs
l
INSPECTOR (S): fce rrell
! FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/
! YES NO
Were problems corrected?
' Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
- REMARKS
1
"'
b'3SPECTOR(S):
's !
N w h5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-3 i PAGE NO.: 4-J.J.o
,I
L
-. -. .
, ,.
.-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 44,2.3.8 PAGE NO.: 3 /v 6-al
TS REQUIREMENT: Orywell Air /acl< ove rall leukay e rnft fef f
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: Srr 057-77v7 ISSUE DATE: 4-/Y IPJ REV.: O
TITLE: O ry well 4ttlult Ove,,l/ kk e$ Lk Test-
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? gra
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should 79
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? YM
REMRRKS: W Te.c.h succ. c x ils fiir presso rit.ine girlock to 11.1 MM.
'
anA muweim ital rair a4 3 rs ID
k LedL rn ks q <e %krt+> "
.
-
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN7
i ITO $ A/ K t. $ws$~ dlkm uh< Klco ru v d TS reusw's, e., f
'
ITl 5) L.rcenee =es+ - r4I m enf '%f1T!ns "
.
INSPECTOR (S): 5t /rel/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
c
YES NO
Were problems corrected? :
,
*
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
'
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ I f"3 f PAGE NO.: A -14 /
t
I..
__ _____________________
* *
,.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,
SS PARA: M, did,8d PAGE N0.: ' d'8[
v ) REQUIREMENT: O nash
y
d< As- [w -
M ,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 6 $~/)- dgSSUE DATE: d- //- F[REV. : O
TITLE:
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Y
Is installed system consistent with TS? F/A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should AM/ _
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkpown? %
REMARKS:
. _
-
STATUS OF ITEM EN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WH Y WHEN?
.
. . /' . // , A. 4a
\qu W MkSCC. M5 i '[ t 'I W" Y '
f*"
INSPECTOR (S): Fars //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
W2re problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
*'
[
'\
SPECTOR(S):
,,hSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5 - 35 PAGE NO.: A - AAL
* *
, ,,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,
-45 PARA: ,[d., , 1 AGE N0.:
( REQUIREMENT: A tha gho WM2[5
D//gt/ f
'" ga
'
d
DA("
'
"O /
LIC. PROCEDUR N .: 600-0]8/ISSUEDATE: REV.: O
TITLE: d'o _ O /1J d,-c,
6 I ~[ '
YES _N_O_
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /g '
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written? /
Has licensee completed procedure alkdown? -
h/ ff
REMARKS: 011% fu/Qif -
0 AEt 0hy-C2f.[LJ$,/
-
-
<
-
v
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WH Y WHEN?
*
M3 0 LJter,st e m o c f resolve Tfl f rocelva w Fj,-d ,
INSPECTOR (S): Fane/I
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
'Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
[ }SPECTOR(S):
\ dN5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75- 15
~ PAGE N0.: kd&3
l
r
*
'.
,
.-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
A S PARA: I d2,3, d PAGE NO.: / f /[
'
]/uu i.ek$ .bM h. k 0 5 , , -
v
y
- -
sREQUIREMfEN:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 45-9-5M' ISSUE DATE: /2,/yf/C kREV. : 6
TITLE: dd t%9
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //A,
Is installed system consistent with TS? Ff4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should F%
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? 8
REMARKS: , [ < . o o j .,(L//
codrwat wl n b a k 4 daw
0 oi 1, luR %2au
^
a
vy
-
_
< twp
n
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 HAT BY WHEN?
11 1 Cd LD w et on e s rmlve TTf fratel4rt (hfl%l '
/
INSPECTOR (S): F= e e //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? 6
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'~
[ ';SPECTOR(S):
\'~ j;5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 35-if PAGE NO.: 4-4 Y
', ",, TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
S PARA: Y, [, , ,I FAG NO.-
-
~8 '
REQUIREMENT: -
/u, a
g v
to ,
v
NA;[/
g -
,/
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 059-3/)d] ISSUE DATE: O-/f-f[REV. : C
TITLE:
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? F/g
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written? }
Haslicenseecofmletedprocedurewalkdown? h/
REMARKS: .i / / . . //
-
$Y
~
AVN l7AAA& O h bYdMW
- v
_
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? '
.
INSPECTOR (5): IY<rre M
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
[ SPECTOR(S):
k d 5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8 J-H PAGE N0.: 4445
L.
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
', , ,. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
c "?> PARA: Y, [rd,[ PAGE NO.: ) - d';23
i
x jREQUI met : /b. a 8 S&MA M x, ,c
/
v
D M Y Z,h f D ho.,s l,si.t0V
--
-
-
-- ,/l
od?-ctu / ISSUE DATE: 7//Y/I'f REV.: (")
LIC.PRdC{DURENO.: o b)
TITLE: 1/4/N
h [ '
[ YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee comple ed procedure walkdown?
//JWe/
'
REMARKS: j\ BM /- N 'IM
( l} T / ()-(f g' j fp
(% % deRI Av(ara
_
./MakD
~
v
} g
'
-
A Vm AG4M
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN fCLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D WH WHEN? '
\95 (O Lrun ue me& resolve Ti fynteAm ce HM
INSPECTOR (S): Fs ere Il
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
W6re any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
SPECTOR(S):
NSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PAGE NO.: A -JH
_
--
', , TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
JS PARA: M, [,d, PAGE NO.: J/[6c2b
JS REQUIREMENT: 6'/ & /z-r bwe o fl,\ 74 v
g (- -
v g
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 600-000 / ISSUE DATE: [#/39-/,Ef REV.: ?/M,T- C
'
# ' '
TITLE: d (13 .
D
'
b YES NO
Is there any d ffeYence between FSAR/SER and TS? M/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? NA' ,
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #[4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? -
4
REMARKS:
I
hr777tAMD (2/1/YJ 0/1 Av[1 up _
'
17)
~ ' ~' '
.2/1 A ,12 noinf fa k,T d
-
n-,qv e-
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): fittee //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPOR1 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
']NSPECTOR(S):
[MNSPECTIONREPORT
'x 50-458/ 8f- 3 r___ PAGE N0.: A4J 7
'
,
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
5'S PARA: Y ,d,N PAGE NO.: [-26 :
( RGQU,IREMENT: O,b a,.b1[ d ,wr) ab%
ddinu dsla w;hA V r'
G (/
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: CN-@/ ISSUE DATE: 7 /n /i't REV.: 0
TITLE: OrfIv U/t6eNA4 Lof(
' '
/ YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M[A
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? \ //
REMARKS: _ /1 o
x. n 9 _ JL . ,1/ //
^
(y 'V4n w w K W X7z ot 11 _
-
n <1 /lR ceGUv "d
/ ) !!
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WH WHEN? '
I% G Lh enee_ nus+ ltcvr a.y prvvek c , waIke l dowr pane &
'
o
sitessly TS (4rm
INSPECTOR (S): Farre //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
tEMARKS:
(C};$PECTIONREPORT50-458/
SPECTOR(S):'
7T-3J PAGE NO.: k-D P
i
b
,
', ,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M,d,3, I M PAGE NO.: $/[h8
1/ 9 r NY [c o r (PCC, ion k, , ( ite,hf/ VOfun f
SREQUIREMENT: ~
' fI
'
f,, fly
., (
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STP 00G-0001 ' SSUE DATE: $ /c29/6f- REV. :
'
C
TITLE: Do/b/ dpro r o / / e /o c
# #
E'6 '
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M
Is installed system consistent with TS? [//F
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M/;(
work as written?
Has licen completed procedure w 1kdown? [g
REMARKS: f't' 8 $4.$ deteYW ,esdU., wY
/Wn $ l 4 A G_,/ Y m t A a W $ $ b /_ 8_ n j &_
,- ,
i l
t;
STATUS OF ITEM
h)
FOR "0 PENS", WHO,MUST 00 WHAT BY kHEN?
CLOSED
\17 h ff thG & %-ffs$$ d 0 Ileh W
cr y '
INSPECTOR (S): Fo rd M
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
( ',NSPECTOR(S):
x -lNSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5-3r PAGE NO.: hW1
I
.
.,
,
... ..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: %4. 3.1.6 PAGE NO.: 3/V 6->P
TS REQUIREMENT: C i cc k fo r prer v a. Pool h)a fe Te sepe,./v,c ( 4 vere e )
less hs or reuel h TS * Lve rs L'l Louvi
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STr apo-cool ISSUE DATE: F/>Y/tY REV.: O
TITLE: 04Tly Drerdiq l</d '
YES N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v4
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or v
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? ./
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should 74
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? #//J
REMARKS: (D Teck s,pec liMt in p- roudart 71 W rr* w
g
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
l1f (O L(asser n,uk currtef Drutedo f
INSPECTOR (S): N rre//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
_N_0
:
Were problems corrected?
i
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 85-3J PAGE NO.: A-HO
*
'
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHELT
TS PARA: 4,d,3,/B, I PAaE NO.: 3/f 6.zr
REQUIREMENT:
$tw Hps Sa c7m feC'f li n fer Te#re,p fpc k ,bfpq
'
-l t"C) ,'n fui$p' w e? f Pr /&9,
'
'
c)
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 4 5~D - d M ISSUE DATE: /- J - 7REV. : O
TITLE:
'
YES NO
Is there any d'fference between FSAR/SER and TS? #/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? //g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure alkdown?
REMARKS:&kl0imtoflcCl D $0m /frih,'vr Taoe r ', recedc</e
'
'
0hlJ, S',f4 C P -lcf /Ploetl Pac Too Pi
-
y
-
5
~
STATUS OF ITEM DPE CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DL WH BY WHEN?
'
[19
0) Lhtnsee nn a b Correch prutedarg ,
INSPECTOR (S): Farre //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES _N_0_
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
r' ';SPECTOR(S):
kjN5PECTION REPORT 50-458L 3 5-35 PAGE N0.: 4 - 131
i
._
l
.
* '
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: '(,6.1.I. 6. A PAGE NO.: 3/v 4-29
TS REQUIREMENT: Check svoeression bal wshe ten "e hevr/v ed en
he 5ll0*F but > 15* h 'and AEsure reaclue oower S 'IVo rahl '
6tressl rower
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STr a57-01o l ISSUE DATE: 8/*/FS REV.: o
TITLE:
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? r/' A
Is installed system consistent with TS? v[' 4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? //4 '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? //4
REMARKS: G) frecedure te ferenie.r operaNIortal Condib'on I e r .L , (und;4a.,
I ca n h of- W a t 4 l 'A ,r o w e i
No mt000 fvy ble+nininq T Avs s'*t prvetAvrt
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
{0PEQ
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MdST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
MO 0 Licenste snust deften,in t when o&caed et md $e c'erformek '
Hl D Litessee mush cor<ref frve nlua '
INSPECTOR (S): Fi: tree II
l FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
:
Were problems corrected?
:
Were any other problems identified?
! STA1US OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
,
INSPECTOR (S):
! INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pf- U PAGE NO.: h436
,
'
*
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,.
S PARA: Y,[, 3 PAGE NO.: 8f I
REQUIREMENT:
0 b,si k SWf ft0SS l6-r l'co / fPis sp dc) ff/
$$ sui no lPS hollc wl st! ' SC ta m wi f 4
'
No'e / 2 8' f) '> Vf f
#
qu/verifV 000 f ft'n< p 4 no" f '
#
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:' d [8-6W ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE:
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/g
Is installed system consistent with TS? M/f
Are there any problems with the TS (factual o.- t/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g/j4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [4
REMARKS: h /L/O /4, # [ do b r/Oen/f, / _p
'
Tos F
"
E in /for l'clcc at P l
-
/
_
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
'
bel- 0 LZ1batt %nY rbvreCY 9m e/4t ,
l INSPECTOR (S): ,[n,f////
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
[ NSPECTOR(S):
' M N5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5 - 35
-
PAGE NO.: _ 14 - 4 1)
- I
i
L ,
1
*
,, TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,,
e[3- PAGE NO.: d-R2 '
('JSPARA:) REQUIREMENT: m YJ?pOgs,(l b,1 J 71A d hDru
na hn
nous, ndMo-.i
.
Awb c6 ub d,a,i< . ,aufAs. ('
7 e
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: #00 - 02 0/ ISSUE DATE: '////ff REV.: C
TITLE: doaf4/y Opu=Hg NS '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? g .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
_
_
nr n
STATUS OF ITEM MEN C E
FOR "0 PENS" WHO MUST D0 W1 WHEN? .
m / l- _ A ,
303 (l} Lhewe mok' Viaa lI fe- ff%72&%W
V
INSPECTOR (S): fit rrt /
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES tg
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
( "':SPECTOR(S): ' '
'
'w .'N5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-35 PAGE NO.: k-AJV
I
e . -_ . ._. . - _ . _. - - - - _ _ _.
. 8
,, ..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4, 6, 3 . 2. O PAGE NO.: J/Y 4-16
TS REQUIREMENT: Co.d=inaest 947F Golu Flow hk ved&c.hh
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: Sir ye3.ojal ISSUE DATE: to /y hv REV.: O
TITLE: Catnin,ien4 Dorf- Cooler FIow /Mt VeerAwh
*
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //4
Is installed system consistent with TS? 4 61
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or ./
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #fy
/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? f4
REMRRKS: G) CAvrtc Al s'<t ervadere de,vf oGl dvcf1lifv hewdort
cif ve(ca l dre_t not f2de L6 accovat 1ke C14ue ab KN '
+t r u rs4va e ve, elsk life
.
$ fnneI ak) Tasfe'omed locahks kre * L.MEsts *
L
! STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
,
W ~
(I) l. o t e n se e mutf torttef DrdetAM
&os D Licens ee a,& inarulk %Iers O
,
INSPECTOR (S): Tu rec //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
0
~
YES .N_0
j
Were problems corrected? :
i
I
Were any other problems identified?
! STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
\
i INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7J-I_f PAGE NO.: h433
. _ ____. _ _
', TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,
S PARA: Y,d 3 d d PAGE NO.: d'N
REQUIREMENT: # m /9 M
-
O , A -e-c Y b ., ,,/ (L N L . h. f(-u'/A,}An.
- .
0
g
LIC PROCEDURE N0.: c2 /d ~d60/ ISSUE DATE: //Mf REV.: O
TITLE: 9 lO ~ 0 609, .
3/.2)}9 f , , ,O _
;y l D:rd Gewater Tat et ~ el f%r /ig i fy Q{ ' 0*1 dqqq tN, p
ivi test *( remic r~
-
T
Is there any erence tween FSA! R and TS? dA
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: 011M/btf 01/) ~000 [ GY bfDs Ti A &
/ uni,,N:.A ' /11 rd%tt '1 M ' 060E l4 nk de4N,
$f
_
m . W ,W 'fh/ nws w mdi ^ d,wwdau JJla.
-
& 244iA'M,oX4, jaa,.EJ mJtes -
j-
-
--
g
STATUS OF ITEM PEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WH T BY WHEN? *
c>0p @ Licenne mus+ c orred proedm ,
INSPECTOR (S): kd r(N[ I
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YCS @
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
(^'?SPECTOR(S):
U iN5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ PI-J.i PAGE NO.: h41(,
n
.
.
'
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.TS PARA: 4,[d 1 PAGE NO.:
f3/['[-k
k N , ,,/uU1/hv
'
[
.d /d,
.
.
) REQUIREMENT: .
-
-
d, ,//b- ,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: //e e h5/s/ ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/g
I
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure ikdown?
REMARKS: (I) 1)Y ( 0 122 b /Ju
g
i
y ,1H14 y-
-
, -
O
a
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WH Y WHEN7
M7 0) biteMtt m us"$' lu ut 61rv&]' wN'0 kwh /vvsedJrt ' )d
"" '
a erw%
'
TS rquirema
INSPECTOR (S): En i re //
FOLLOWL'P ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0,
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
(']NSPECTOR(S):
k,N5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ P(- 7J PAGE N0.: k4D
.
', ', TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
m TS PARA: I3d P GE N0.: 7/[ b-k ,.
1 REQUIREMENT: $M[ I
M
/ u
e bY % /2gf/4e4 $
~-.-
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: c2#f-/Ro/ ISSUE DATE: '///]/f
' ~ ' ~ y REV. : O~
TITLE: L f d T (% Fbw 7 psf ' '
'
[ YES NO
j
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and T5? ,, /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or t
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should F
/4
work as written?
Has licensee plet d procedure walkdown? k
REMARKb: ,rou'Yure -
kPu 0 InP+b f. PJ $
-
r $le Q
_
-
n
STATUS OF ITEM MPE ' CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHA BY WHEN?
&D? G) Licence m ss+ ku.ieas,pnfe.alleddsv,, y,vled a,<
INSPECTOR (S): fu rec. /[
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
t
/'~NSPECTOR(S):
<
E i N5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95-35 PAGE NO.: A-J W
l
.
',, ',, TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA 5HEET
-JS PARA: , ,d! PAGE NO.: 3/y 6-3)
l 3 REQUIREMENT:
Icolaf,'oA Ua fl! P /J V( ' ' 1C8
t g
- -
u
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:,: ,_
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
'
TITLE: --}clOI oh 31 prorkuf PS fo COVfr /4,'s tft% -
# '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS ($1ll 0(Oc uff5 rit 10 ft?) D,\ hnf
..
-
MCDrP4 Af f) 7 0 & W u t ? ' l
EQn k v4 E Shet$
r
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 I BY WHEN?
'
M9' (D Lumte owsf is su a.o,sas)- .walkd dw ,s m J u a -
INSPECTOR (5): Fu ret //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N, 0_
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
/^']NSPECTOR(S):
'
'x_UN5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 1 5-3 ( PAGE NO.: h439
L .
_ - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- _ , _ _ _ _ . -
,
'
*
.
.-
,
TECHNICAL. SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
i"N
%./
TS PARA: M,[. I', ! PAGE NO.: M'/ 6 -3 L
on- 0301 faix Cyr a,/ns
so 6 - o 30 t
& & 4 7 & la n ,' Jufda
_j& 030 / b vr $ o
io 9 -0Jo i 3 % A 6. 24 A S
n c-O I du k $$ N J 4 A 242!7xle
lal~o To I - whad &
Jaa-630/ ,L26.w.9'4L; 2/ abs
ao%no/ ll/A.) riale 0/2d lRo he
p04-0303 hft/fvb4
904-b30 f de j /t// ya hs
A o+-0?O C b d fI// Ual6 ,
20T-030i V)Va$4ns -
S n9 - 03s I
e
fd/d
p a $, k ,l $ ,.o $
s.i
_A c4-OToI
% k -, ?/ S 2/ l A
Nn,-ohlh 5 T$ ) h> & Art 8
$b { 1-u5l' U k2 4
Q(T - 0 S0r) -
-
, ,.
-
INSPECTION REPORT 50 8/5p./ Fr-31 PAGE NO.: h+f0
r-
.
.
.. ..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
l'D
U ,, PAGE NO.: J/f 4 -1 l
TS PARA:
0 +6V 63o2 UK/ //tMd 2/do
./> 4 Jo -o30 / PAJYh ZhWb 9'
-
9 doi-o.30/ $ 7/ M W 7/a $e d
Goa-O / //dd J//[2 ej
40 l-0 M/ '2 w e .! LA. l
&la~dJK0w nb
i'
O'
'v -
.
._
!
,
INSPECTION REPORT 50 t,$/ 8J-Jf
PAGE NO.: /r 'M /
r
,
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.' -
'
'
'
RE e+ uz e J
a
o'R + LT a a sa
-
'
'
ISSUE DATE: REV. 3
LIC. PROCE URE NO.:*
TITLE: h/w/ LN A CONSI'veh> Sl ecf Edh
'#
Y h1 0
@( JM ' '
YES 8 0
N0
Is there any differen e between FSAR/SER and T5? F//l
Is installed system consistent with TS? ,
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee co leted procedure walkdown? k
REMARKS /ll $hMfekt6s ,_ h ej- $/ / d Ysn;,
Dhr,4Atc/xdn&WMiddb /WAiSf /
Yl? >t~sdJ 910- Acf/ " A)<<D 1 bhite/, . , &J ,
^
-
Nh w ]vs Ou:40.O . " 8a,-E0<1W !.' />wM/gh4 V
lllhohostrol-t h/ $ WAWh "*?ttmk
STATLlS @ ITEM /h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
>Io O Lheaee nosF lsive asarna walicedduit oadhuer '
~
wit (D uwee m ast ced 'bruae.Ce
INSPECTOR (S): F4<<< #
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
_N_0
!
Ware problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
l
(':SPECTOR(S): ' ' PAGE NO.: h4u
l \ w .15PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-3 f
'l
!
L.
.
.
.. .
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
(n)
TS PARA: e [< ,2 PAGE NO.: 3/v. 4-11
072-OGoI
~
/% cL,/ !k%ahme,<,,)
b 4
}.22-0 30 / d 0r' N2 s-
asnox) HNs'2bda MA,
b u ~[ l] ell hs-,/
wud6:b :
a is -060 i
aio-ose %7 U L J lle' %
O s J L A M r r m 2)
'309-060) LO h 04@
E ads abf]l>
_, 416 -010/ b$lfD Abd
M-030/ hurf4JdAM)daks/
D A & 24
w 1 %f V
"
" '
,
PAGE NO.: A->U
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45T/ ff-Jf
._ .
- *
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA 5HEET
.
-
'TS PARA: ,[, bd PAGE NO : 3df-1)
* I'"' EQUIREME : M[ d h Th / &#
'
y _Y,:, " ~$h [/ l
' ' I
'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: t ' ISSUE DATE: , REV.:
TITLE: ./AAfr-e A d/ 8M/<v >, ConU4 ved'e[56 ee [-
E YES NO $
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? __
M
Is installed system consistent with TS? //
'Are there any problems with the TS (factual or / b
- cditorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? M/A '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should t/ff
~
work as written?
Has licen e comple d procedu
.///-(# e48
walkdown?
/## M &m
fd- }
REMARKS.
,As,/0 A /to*MYl $&/ ) O
-
g -
-
fh
STATUS OF ITEM hN)
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
ML (D l116*tStt Muh SS de elppok , w b4llowit frecefu,e(
INSPCCTOR(5): b/re//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N0
I'Were problems corrected?
f
f Were any,other problems identified? ,
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
P REMARKS:
"
["'lSPECTOR(S):
' PAGE NO.: A-H 'l
. ' w 25PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-If ,
lI
!
: . ,
-- _
,
. *
,
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: ,, PAGE NO.: )!Y 6-lA 1
\
Mabe.s2/ s Y sAv2/0
A d4 SON [#dOw
sg -
a TS. Y. b N G ! M .-
90 /- O M/ - SZ d L, , l sn Ym
'
not- 0 ?ol
-
A<sw Nr dh gNfsW '
shoox/ &Aujat-uL 97& 4
/ c/
e&&
f~ \
l
\ (J'\
~b '
JM n - & 0 f .
~ ' \
41 my
(/
.
i
O -
'\ -
't
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4SP/ 15-35 PAGE No.: A"hTJ
-
.
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET - ,
<b ! PAGE NO.: 7/4 b y9
TS P RA: /
[ ' REQUIREMENT: 2 4. $ble/ 7M,d8 <d[
'
- Y AJtA/440W i Y bNbE L noba . VY, _Y& l '
'
~
'
V Q)g
'
0 C/
,
ISSUE DATE: P'_M ,W - REV.: O
LIC.PROCEDURdp: CM'@O/
TITLE: b,lV, a v/ [u_
hb [
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and T5?
Is installed system consistent with TS? [
Arc there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
D es procedure carry out TS requirement? f '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /j/4
work as written?
Has licensee comp ted procedure walkdown? ,
d _
REMARKS: D $ilVRs IS?Did/Afd
t Q4 & *Tegf ,
-
/ S n $. N , b b
v- /
-
[ $ k
-
< $, 6 , .Q , 3 yf),
,
l4-@
-
-
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? '
O43 h hlAL MM$ VLrify TS p rerSures tre covred
INSPECTOR (S): h(r#/,/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
i Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
!
SPECTOR(S):
f';!5PECTION
'%. REPORT
50-458/ 95 - 3 5 PAGE NO.: h+'/ 4
I
-
. - .
.
.
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
15 P A. , ,f/ PAGE NO.- 7/h ~
(~iREQUIREMENT: [ "
We
.Y g A .turb Antkh NY~
'
LIC. PROCEDURE N .: BZt? -o202 ISSUE DATE: s/// /fi REV.: 6
TITLE: '77 . &*24 IMi
h b '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and T5? 7
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or . -
editorial)?
If
f
D:es procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should Mg
'
work as written?
l
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? h
REMARKS:
/ A 0 $n
~
(t) V@ fM*"
p
-
_
i
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
OM D lt\tMet n u s$~~ itWe 4, ,/n!k Walbd Odwat krviedOvt
-
,
l
INSPECTOR (S):
'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
[^}SPECTOR(S):
l C2 5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75 - JC PAGE N0.: A--J4 7
'I
{
5
-
* TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.. ..
TS PARA: IdC /<d f PAGE NO.: [-S h
7
["') REQUIREMENT: [$ TC d //pu
Q)
~~
~/ g
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:2 r')- M o 2 ISSU DATE: / - 3df5'liEV. : O
TITLE: $6 N d #pu[ ~ M 74M :
I [ '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? / l
Is installed system consistent with TS? /[A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /%
work as written? ,
Has licensee c leted procedure walkdown? h
REMARKS:Q f
$/4 AvY %sd f) irs, bad '
c2 Manfl~ ' 7&B m h
g y ', 'jj ~
v i
rf
O cr7T-&R ku 22 d i~24 Kw/
G Gb,s % b 6 - 2.1
~
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? '
Ol5 (O UTcesau rw3% etrolve Ts/procelsre cuftrck
kih @) t0Al Musi~ Verif,y r erredntN o F TS Fim es
INSPECTOR (S): Fu reel
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
"'
SPECTOR(S):
l $PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-3J PAGE NO : Ar4 YP
i
- -_-. _ _ . - _ _
_ -.
.
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SilEET
TS PARA: IdC [(,[ PAGE NO.: 3 [-$D #
IfMr;bV fuel b W4 H t/ 4 f u, , ll c{faw lh $,0
'
l'^) REQUIREMENT: ' '
bm ca u ~t in 2h $ttbn/9 Or koCS a u } tu o .'s fa;.1 / ( kr
a+/pcc+ Z hau / w.' n 4 flow n fe ,,domfer wm (cwgpf
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: Id6-BfCllSSUE AT - /.2-C-FY REV.: d
'
TITLE: fea h/ N W U A Y k
N I l/ '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or [
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M[4
work as written?
pl A[/
HaslicenseeYnetedprocedurewalkdown?el
REMARKS: CO d M 6s<< me4aersim A/
"
d
_ WHL L A >aeo
.Jg-- - -
y
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
&l7 @ INLtMit- nosy (1 sue Mp&, wa{ke) dwN /)widM
addres St% N i h m
INSPECTOR (5): Fane//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
iWere any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
" '
:SPECTOR(S):
k 25PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 f-3r PAGE NO.: h4W
l
-
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
15 PARA:
,b N PAGE NO.: IT/
dera t cto ,1 srea { s'ir/pcyp'h1/ ~
'
('} REQUIREMENT:t.tonel
'\J' ht/f f c ' (kl*14 - ,/ P h *hY Pf/W y b& vh a ,)
6 41,a or:w & Ju s t lu'.J o + , ' '
'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: #00-d/d/ ISSUE DATE: n Sc-Pf- REV.: O
TITLE: /wph[\/ O/T /Oc
' '
h YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or [
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? // '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? MA
REMARKS: bte l kuibliur (7perph(cehsbisS {oW rcf
_
'
Q( I Wo hPf
_
C
STATUS OF ITEM PE CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHA BY WHEN?
LhTtns
'
LECChSLC rnosY u% uwyovkft
& @
I
INSPECTOR (S): Rue /[
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
1
YES NO
l
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
*
l
[lSPECTOR(S):
I~sbSPECTIONREPORT 50-458/ 3 r-7 f PAGE N0.: hv50
'
. _- - - - . .- . -
g .*
'- , c .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 6, f. 3 4. PAGE NO.: 3/</ 6-S 2
4
TS REQUIREMENT: VeribY Kol(I% tirtie of seco=Jov u 47,i, c,./-
'
r
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: Sff 8(0347a ISSUE DATE: to/a /t Y REV.: O
TITLE: Annuld presstut c,nfrol 5vsfem ole mer oye a b 7/7 fy
[SW yoC-cy54 *iO44MI siso 'alftraile )
NES $
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or v/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
/
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? M[d
REMARKS: @ Th>u J a = # c r5 :<t 409-07plCl HV4-400 IF 4 aad
i HV A-400 ?6 ) Ar-e adf- ITsfed in T=ble 7.6.S.3 -l aF 75.
Th est daaen lithA r., 401 -070I ( Avril,u 8vild. su, % e, "
Ogn&sIIb,j'aet y}a,div 4 a %im ed 3,ysWs, Jan, l$
. , ,
STATUS OF ITEM
@M
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
l '
l st<t @ Lates.se nwk veuIve Ts/rrvuA*e unFla'd
l
l
INSPECTOR (S): b /r8 [[
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
l N_0
l Were problems corrected? :
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
_._
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-SS PAGE NO.: 4-M/
- -
,
.
-
,
.-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: S 6,$,3. 8 PAGE NO.: 3/y 6 -S 3
-TS REQUIREMENT: Everv iF mon % 3 ve ei Fv &+ r ,c A is , I= fio <1
'
A_aaun e r acNuaht on r'etelu$ of Nn isc i sh% Sica (
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STr vvJ-el ISSUE DATE: REY.:
TITLE: kly
t_ roced.irts Lt03 ~0G 0k ad 409 -0601. h l (t.c f D
YES y
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? d
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or j
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #[4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? M[f]
REMARKS: @ f/03-060b doef ut check otll amulur Jauers lisk,)
on Table 3.L. 9. 3 -l of- l'S. $ 401-0G0\ 4csiraclva+rs of
1 Yect2if c F a hr4k vndrah% s Te Aal - n c f a ren4xinm e st IioL+%
so%$ 0 An bv$ds% A>vw Nofaddressed hv reft >enel wondarts
_
@ $c TS it. L.S.S,A aske Js 'on hwr rthNe etoLleN
' '
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN? '
M (D Lnwee must realve Ts / proudn c h Hatl
M{
(D ll2 Chief mai Is5vt 4ppre rt2 s #A(ktd hn Wrvud wer
,
INSPECTOR (S): Furell
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES &
:
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
l-
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
i INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 15 -3 f PAGE NO.: 4-H JL
_. _ . - ._ _ _ ._._ ____ _ ___ , _
._
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'. . '
.
1
I,[, C 3. d 3// d-[J f
5 PARA:
REQUIREMENT: S G 8 r St S
PAGE NO.:
Tec 61 ' Gsec fr &< f,3)
! ,
1
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 403-dh
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? F/A-
1
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
D:cs procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written? j
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? %[
REMARKS:
_
Ste. TS %(,,c,J.A coun d
_
0 CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHA BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): lim //
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES _NO
Were problems corrected?
Werei any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED i
STATUS OF ITEM )
REMARKS:
'
(^^!SPECTOR(S):
b $PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75 -1 f PAGE N0.: A--M 3
1
1
1
.
* -
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW 0ATA SHEET
TS PA A: Ie de$ b PAGE NO.: 7M dd$ I
(~)EQUIREMENT:
,(harYkg ACo c Tric o-lm p& ll f) /r r ofermd/Vy
N &S4 PU& /V ~4h WN / T
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: c;279-0202 ISSUE DATE: /- Iv-52[ REV. : O
TITLE:
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
V
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or ,,
editorial)?
D;es procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //[4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? M/4
REMARKS:
59 '44 fr~-7 P 0 cit l'lu rf P
M
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WH BY WHEN? .
3.u. Lneaee most Finelh proceJos
INSPECTOR (S): b r//" /[
FOLLOWUP ACTION: 'INSPECTIO$ REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
,
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
/^75PECTOR(S):
/SPECTIONREPORT50-458/ 35-Jf PAGE NO.: A~ >J Y
) !
1
1
;
_ ,
-
< -
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET ,
.. ..
/
TS PARA: 4I,b,82 7
PAGE NO.: 7/[ d-8 '/
( )REQU)IEMEyT:
/ p/> b kn ff h/c} o-f l-l 5 /P) harroc {
'J
'
+ < ItNr','% &/?C T ' L' //n,'n c Ac h, /. -c or
/' l, n :, o / /r'rlec se
'
U
O
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: c25~D-MO/ ISSUE DATE: '3 // /ff REV. : O
TITLE: (n hre,'rf / e w ,' c s/
~
K $ '& T R'//rc/,'c,&
C/ YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should F['g
work as written?
Has licensee comgleted procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: /> r u {i 9P
'
hrccr l W P
v
_
'
_
STATUS OF ITEM PEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 Wij,_ BY WHEN? ,
l P3 L lmne e m vs+ FMali te. proaaliq
,
1
INSPECTOR (S): '
[Or"/Y [[
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
W2re any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
""
l /^' SPECTOR(S):
t /
,
' w 25PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5-3J PAGE NO.: h- >M
9
l
l
I
, . TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
S PARA: .bf id d f PAGE NO.: [ -f 7
^
^ ; REQUIREMENT: /cv/ cuo/vc/e c/ 84o w ,o / [ ' / M f--
,
[O '
tn T $G T h W*r V /P me , /4 e of -f$ /fw a %
/R &u% f hronr f,, Sr'(Pi o lt 4 lc o l fP/Po TP
LIC. PROCE00RE N0.: 2 C9-F40/ ISSUE DATE: /J -J)P-)P 9- REV. : g
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or y
cditorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS. requirement? t,/ .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
.
' h o f,' 2 p f/d nec/u/ .p
n
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
PY l-item e e ru s s[ fe'r oulize pro c ede ve
INSPECTOR (S): '
[4frN/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
"
'}SPECTOR(S): PAGE NO.: A-H6
N,JSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ if -3 f
i
_____x.
, , TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.- .-
TS PARA: 4dif iM PAGE NO.: 7/f[~8h .
'
, D REQUIREMENT: $b$[ du -hs s+ - ()(jpy y
U if ~./n r
'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: c2f'9-c(o/ ISSUE DATE: /-bg REV. : r")
-
TITLE: R G TSomoL*I& Tec-f
' '
/ YES N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or #
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? @ '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should W/}
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
'
REMARKS: Y hedci <1 Woc'S ric?f sfet- llv t- fro t Aof&
ht"O c 'S [ m u 54 b,o- fpqje/,' ' c p ,, g fa
'
-/- P S 4
'
f/ O10f 0 of P
_A
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM [ DEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WF WHEN?
5 f icertsec thJs f r ovre cf fvoiec lwr
INSPECTOR (S): b7rryv//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
f';SPECTOR(S):
k b5PECTION REPORT 50-458/-7J-3J PAGE N0.: A-H7
)
-
i
* l
- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
' l
. .
TS PARA: ,
<[ < PAGE NO.:
;
~' REQUIREMENT: f ,( 6 7 [m, c s , <o ,, o / Mef o n /OCM l
[x..Y $iruo
~
'
l
'
.
()
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 89-6(O/ ISSUE DATE: 7 -d /- P 4 REV.: O
TITLE: Aa v< 6/c<'c I/ss F A u /c de t frt
Y '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 7
Is installed system consistent with TS? z/
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or f[
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should AA/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? %
REMARKS: k w h /- k s sd f + 04 Y awn //paf 5y's&-n
(pq u Opd c<r -f D o / fo ~ s Au f <w W 5' f6; T
- .
e
-
O
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
& l-h 6,se t ino N cwecl ,protedM
INSPECTOR (S): [o rreo//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
_N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
\ .
l /^ ".SPECTOR(S):
! b]:5PECTIONREPORT50-458/PS-35 PAGE NO.: h-M/
0
. _ . _ - - . . _ _ . . .
'
l
' , . '. .
- '
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4,[, ( k . PAGE N : f [~~ I
Omd 7/M >M 8/Ilbb
TS bRE UIREMENT:/ s8a r ads a
'V
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: M7-66d/ ISSUE DATE: 79/-)Pf- REV : C
TITLE: (2Anki9%'wL -
sks LW4Y d
p vg -
'
.
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee c pleted procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: '
-ra[/ 7 ( //'cyeMc4 / 9
I
r
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
*
M7 Licema m usi- k,(in proc ejo.c
INSPECTOR (S): [o rno//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected? <
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S): '
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-35 PAGE NO.: A+57'
1
.-
-
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Md ,d PAGE NO.: ['- f 7
(
~
'
'1/.sn Y asusmo L > mm f/ f f) !
%.))REQUl EMENT:& /gh"()) j[d '-f[ff g>. jj; o ,
'
,,, g
"
"
$/w sA /A C00 C F Af 2 /oX,
LIC.' PROCEDURE NO.: J hD-d/JO] REV W5 C
TITLE:
$0 }-0lo/ySUE
w
\ DATE:SNI UYY W '~0"
l */ 55 (
" * n n u o v> +rr PG g 5 W /~cey;
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M T
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
cditorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? [ '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should Mg4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
he u e 1?r o c e lcs/e c /WeWeee,/ jy /irager
'
REMARKS:
'
l'in t P Y 0 ( P i *r Cr A? f f o'/i)'rr'o Y P . 0//p e -t r9toek/cr FP
2 C')- 06d f. S hW TS H ero di H' v' %9
^
f9
-
O,4 se 4 c, e f e / t d c e r 0/sD Av ff - AJon 4 of
f4 nP Wor &cdPR oe/c/%rr IPrestorF dfci/)' GrforS
STATUSOFITEk h CLOSED [,'[-88 /S
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? '
N> ucense e mvs+ 1%e awoveJ. walice) Jw snuelsre "
,A,-d
et Adaner TS resuke d' e
INSPECTOR (S): for r#//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES PLO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
/~'lSPECTOR(S):
N.[;5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5-71 PAGE NO.: A-M O
-)
-
.' *
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA 5HEET
TS PARA: h,d N <} PAGE NO.: 7/[ d--If
l)REQUlR[ MENT:/ufoa eff
f
km hr $86 7 ffr,q k%q
'o'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 463-060/ ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE: ef 5'U- C60 3 '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? M[/4
REMARKS: be 0 //rorfWurps f p f rer,o d 1v // h >am ,
c>NtWS IN e a G a { M + u 0 b 'c rn : n p ,' / 4 e f
^
Dmredo fp a d'dfeffe}~ co /o m f.'c c<rfen f,%og
- 1
m.
STATUS OF ITEM 'W
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
c% 9
L t'a nte e in as 1-issue epsyvve), twilce) drwn Mot $ dug '
whrck <dd<ntes T5 huial<,,t'
INSPECTOR (S): Forrr[/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
['"SPECTOR(S):
'ub5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ PT-35 PAGE NO.: h HI
i
_ _ . . _
-
, .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DA1A SHEET
,
.
..
TS PARA: b[<Ne f PAGE NO.: 7 [I
//Pr; h) 'hW doer /<'aq k p p r y ] f e ,, ,
('v' REQUIREMENT:
dono He art &G/ W
'
j
/la ., le
/
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: OfD-6603 ISSUE DATE: //-8'-84 REV.: O
TITLE:
g
,
YES
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
i
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g/g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: ,, / // _
'
_
#, i a a I i F e .frae oc/w < P
-
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO NH BY WHEN7 .
&30 Licemee m ust- h%//ie j<nda
INSPECTOR (S): fo tr pf/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
W2re problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
iSPECTOR(S):
( F.14.L
C INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 15-J f PAGE NO.:
I
. _ - _
'
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: , [, PAGE NO.: ) [
/ ' ' REQUIREMENT: //pr/[\/ [[[9 hro d rr Mih , Af M '
')
'D a llt ci 9 4 d, f N /// w le., &rtg
# g by /?m A S
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ,,7r 9-/4(C ISSUE DATE: f- /- P [ REV.: __ / _7 _
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? If
Is installed system consistent with TS? [
Ara there any problems with the TS (factual or /
cditorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /[ '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M[/}
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: , , . , ,
.
-
~ -
,
_
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN ' LOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): '
Fe< rr#//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
W2re problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
"
, O 2SPECTOR(S):
; 1
'wWN5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS- J f PAGE NO.: Md43
i
'
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
*
, '.
TS PARA: EAF PAGE NO.: [-EF
'
'~'3REQUIREyJNT: O M A /; hsI' M gm]M # dug
O n&s !V AL 4m &La y
( <' g/
-
'
REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 079-30/ ISSUE DATE:
TITLE: ,
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? vp
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
D::es procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? M/t
REMARKS: ( f)n 4 c/ S [$ $, d , [ fi R.1 '
_
da YC%5
_
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7 *
33 i L D.emee er ost- h% In c inneLee
INSPECTOR (S): f0rre// '
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? 3
OPEN CLOSED
i STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
l
l '
f (~SSPECTOR(S): 44(, y
- PAGE NO.
kJh5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5 .75
li
l
*
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET -
. ,
.
TS PARA: I,[dD PAGE NO.: 3 M d - f Cf
/ 'hREQUIREMENT: 440 1// /s/ ,, u m h o a r h-f o[
~Y 5 C
'
11nu lri c Ali %c, ,. s u, -
p<M
c
-
,,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: id3-0303 ISSUE DATE: - REV.: ,
TITLE: f/'orpAte n--/p/ps,s) s'n fi Vrews s's-ref,oy if no f
'
ft# f M//Wt"4 YES
@V
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? A / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should I/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? #/4
REMARKS:
_
_
_.
STATUS OF ITEM PEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHA BY WHEN?
' H.L Liteau m a+ rs see avnive) .waliced daua, sro ced' ave - "
ctdA<nn%, TJ (4v&cN,"ed
i INSPECTOR (S): [Gy'r#//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES _NO
Were problems corrected?
l
l
Were any other problems identified? .
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
.
REMARKS:
!
/~'ESPECTOR(S):
! /
l
'Ed5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pf-3 ( PAGE N0.: h-Hf
l0
l
* *
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA 5HEET l
*
'. j l
TS PARA: I,[*[ ( O, 2 [ PAGE NO.: 8/bN
PV&t/ /,5'P<os/$5 lu .< < 4 r % o I fes f
(N-]; REQUIREMENT:Inclvhng
'
C<!fo cer tue f bs 'fr o - Jere, or 1, ,' c A \
m.di, R + o f A, .r A s M v, '~ c sv rnJr I
'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: fd3-o/,02 ISSUE DATE: U R EV .': C ~
I
TITLE: As, u u fas M i r ivc Su cf <*~ 1 Of}
'
[.,. * /r *o fa b ~ 1P.x f
W ' '
YES @
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should r/4
work as written? " 97,060.2-
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REKARKS: k(Ce . h 6 3 - 0 8 '() / bon () " kris y lay b,'y, ' c-
$2<-/ A .! '
,fu ~ e- / i m- e E / s- f 4 W
-
,
'
(Pro & n wu /F b/ llor N ec2 ha da Q d,jg
i,d _
STATUS OF ITEM [
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
OB LZtenat m ust' h % lT24 4 to ud art
INSPECTOR (S): [<pf y//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
W;re problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
' '
SPECTOR(S):
( PAGE N0.: h-X &
'%N5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 f- 3 J
3
'
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'
. .
TS PARA: 4I, [[O 2 PAGE NO.: 3/b~[O
I REQUIRE $ENT:
. hoe d [F 77 5 /- o[ f u fy o [a S
'n /bfo'N~(j N $v'Ne~ swr y <
/f" G o ar / // 3
i
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: Nbd/6/ ISSUE DATE: 7-J/-F9 REV. : O
TITLE: ) ,nc< 4 5 Nr '/s'. e Sy'ff% S.wte 'wp
'
e / TPS-f-
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Y
Is installed system consistent with TS? //
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? *
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
krrr"n'/G- r P lf's ' WP/ r q haf hi'u T
'
REMARKS:
'
~ sw> t H e < ed 3 4 0 4.J' ~ n os s' + 4 e
Somf GS Dis f'
-
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
.4Jf Lhenset mo t h Covvech cvo t ed art
,
INSPECTOR (S): fa lrP//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Ware problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
NSPECTOR(S):
[ PAGE NO.: k-H J
bin 5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ W5-35
l
- _
,
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
. ..
TS PARA: ICC 8,3. M l~ PAGE NO.: b'60
( bREQUIREMENT:
khulV9 kiy'i -m '
fv <+ P+, WWd * f$,,on/
G ; s, ; / . b -r s , t m-+ "e %, ,,
f
&n o.: ;a
-
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: N3-686/ ISSUE DATE: f , .7/ -f4r- REV. : C
TITLE:
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #
Is installed system consistent with TS? [
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
-
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should 8/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V 1
REMARKS:
l4c ff x 0e rde, &
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? '
035 Lice niee m ar f $ nu N2e ,(Jrvt4)urc
INSPECTOR (S): [G /-#//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
_N_0
W re problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
,FiSPECTOR(S):
\ l FJ 4?
N M 5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ '3 f-31 PAGE NO.:
)
,
. - TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.. ..
TS PARA: Y, def 6 PAGE NO.: ) -I /4
[ ') REQUIREMENT , [a/! dM [ Mwre/
NI O/DALt GbEb ~ A&er, L) h r*r b so'uue f'e A,.,o /,y n
/ u
-
g - u
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ddO4CO/ ISSUE DATE: REV.: C)
TITLE: OG ,'//t/' d # c- /-.0C
" N '
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #/4_
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? YE
REMARKS: No f doo mr/ As ,
tyro c-edi/ 9 -
7
_
-
0
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
,N$ Lfernsee nsY Esive itry run) .tual{cd down f(WSM
'
0))mVr TS re+ oiEE, e, fs
,
i
l
INSPECTOR (S): gopr#[/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: I$5PECTIONREPORT50-458/
YES NO
l
Were problems corrected?
Were any otner problems identified?
! STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
/ :SPECTOR(S):
I
v N5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5- 31 PAGE N0.: Mh9
0
}
'
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET ,
-
:
TS PARA: Y, de .8 PAGE NO.: 7 d 6 [
&l bes,'(b'ac //t/ } f /-/ff) ! f&f,,o,, /
(G R/kr
' REQUIREMENT:
Afs., H / v G%&/, /'v'
/ r r
rw '
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: M-Odo/ ISSUE DATE: /J .,7c- & REV.: O
TITLE: aS erXoc/ F '
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and T5? //
Is installed system consistent with TS? [
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
cditorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
#4
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
(. t 0 / m
,fl uct {t / P //f0 C &'Of if f (
^
,
--. -
,
- -
_
.. .
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN? .
03? lAttmee on.d b hM lTze f rn edwt
INSPECTOR (S): [o r /p//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES t@
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
' '
/ '7SPECTOR(S):
!
,
V5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75 -J f PAGE NO.: k-> 70
i
. -. ._ _-
.
'
', TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA:
Y, b f, d. ,Iy jG PAGE NO.: 3/f $N
[ ) REQUIREMENT: /vpore /po l oce PS7 e- d r- M6M '
'" O
'
/cf flo eno/ k'/fWT
2 -2 F/FdEV. : C
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 4 6 - R $ / ISSUE DATE:
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? [
Is installed system consistent with TS? ff
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
cditorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should NA'
work as written?
Haslicenseecompleedprocedurewalkdogw
REMARKS: E" & ft W '
ff r o c- d c r p
_
_
r
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
pf L reme e mas + Re lite ,owek
INSPECTOR (S): [o,v p [/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
NSPECTOR(S):
UjN5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5-35 PAGE NO.: h47 f
~ < .
-
,
.,.
*
TECHNICAL' SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'.'
TS PARA: MMefd 8,2 PAGE NO.: 3 [-6A.
( ' REQUIREMENT: l'c? $ n u o /v c' r n -f $bcr-ccica l
G g /Apr /
LIC. PROCEDJRE.NO.: - FAld l ISSUE DATE: /2////fff - REV. : C
'
/ 1/lcryoc, / /9///n f, cm, foy-d,4
TITLE:' fo$ $<<i/L U
$/ /fo4%r '
No $9/y7,'y
YES
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or / b
-
editorial)?
'
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should Fgt
work as written?..
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
. REMARKS: ,
-
,fi49 b'E e & cec /rf
__
=
_
,
.
~~
O
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHA BY WHEN? .
~ A3'f_ LitenSee mvst F;,mli2e proted us
INSPECTOR (S): [Q wro//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
,
3
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
#
J
REMARKS: ,
_
' '
fSPECTOR(S): PAGE NO.: 4-#71
CJf5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-3 5
; - ,
.
.
.
/ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .- J
._ __ _. _ _ _ _ _ ___________________________________________
', , TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET ,
. .
TS PARA: ib{d 8,Jy g7)j PAGE NO.: ['~6 d
') REQUIREMENT: [/oe fearf. M% o d'o- I [56/6 dir ,- 5 5 7 s-
[d c d lressv<</M,l
'
ret J 'fe / Au ;A.4.,,
~
'
~
"
ht//d
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: @6-6(,O/ISSUEDATE: / 2 - 4-# b EV.: 6
TITLE: ft,,o l 8 c,/(d'i+, .H t/M f 6<< ~ / fi /fer-
'
Geon4f/x
' ' ?7=rf
M
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or [
cditorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should A//A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
{ci cy / W h r-f si m f,, {,o/
' '
REMARKS: }{}p & u c , <r e
des)c, i % o' f o'o / .'o m GC o c. P W o C nvc n clq /
i a i /,'o No n
' '
-
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
&Yo L heaee mat h< ve wreef walicel '
dswn p n>dd s<e
a Deessry T3 reyone%e, ;
INSPECTOR (S): / orN [/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
~'
NSPECTOR(S):
'L' INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ <tf-3 r -
PAGE NO.: k-H3
i
- _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -
.
~
*
'
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
, .
TS PARA: I,dd PAGE NO.: 3 O
ke//$c,,*//;n }l I/ / d d Ao r e c,o / / ~fit ,or R g'r
('\ REQUIREMENT:
'
A VfcS$ do < rni- e 80o As r*r o n a o /// s /> p s d er
' '
f% m n d //u e A n s
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: N6-d3 ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE: //C'[ ///r,'[t"e /H d r'o M Og / L/
'
YES _N[
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and .S? p/'
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
cditorial)? i
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written? /
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? \/
REMARKS: // / / o .,
lWl ,YP//lA f
h/'O'r p,//, , ,, r
- V
~ '
r ' 't
d. ., ,,,,, ,fj ,
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN? '
M{ Lile Atee M viY 11sv< < M w d ,, M Uce ) l n & ,, y rot 4Awf
INSPECTOR (S): ba r/F//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES fj0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
"'
[~"7SPECTOR(S):
b)iSPECTIONREPORT50-458/ PAGE NO.: 4-D Y
l
..
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET _ ,
TS PARA: f.E d.[[ PAGE NO.:
( REQUIREMENT:
[o,o / /$ce e'Ye c ////dd' }-}<974r.7 WrWrWp '
G cefleas4 M K<# n A e. /n+oc/
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 466-//Od ISSUE DATE: //-/Jff REV.: C
TITLE: fe,,o I /$c, llW<'~ c:
"
$bo rem / 5/hr Sv c+ea /-lrdef~
'
(of>GriYy' Tetrr N0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M[4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
REMARKS: f/rpf'fawr,o h/'ikPf/cr '
Ms s ,o '
Nwri s -f, b@
'
-rg a ., 7'ee t? rw e r - c>x -
^
if
/) / xi
-
k' s'(.sfo [t W P N$[WG' f f
r
STATUS OF ITEM PEN CLOSED
l FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHA BY WHEN? '
31L- L-ieen s ee e1v& flaultze o roceJon
INSPECTOR (S): [G//~#//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
' '
[ 1SPECTOR(S):
'ud6PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95-3/
'
PAGE NO.: k47J
<
.
.- - TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET .
TS PARA: I, [,[, PAGE NO.: -d k
^'s REQUIREMENT:
NVMror P4 [ & ot, /,/ <f e r / o , a , 6 , ,, [ M s y '
[O cwrv c'd~ #4r
* '
-
<
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 25 4-04tQ ISSUE DATE-
/2- /,-FY REV. : G
TITLE: b Nea /ls /4'vc/ rec n co a 1, aer && Sa uc << ku /
Y '
YES NO NTf
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? jf
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or f[
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
M
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /4
work as written?
Has license ompleted procedure walkdown? [jf
REMARKS: fryr%WW t=' /nes 5 nko V jef
GkI 12lO <,e p &c!o' Nr/q 11hdc r7cs v.,fi.p,.-y
^
/m
'
f) /c ~ c)-f '2 c he c '"
-
!
_A
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? '
P0 Liance inus + iuo<pon be "l2TC1r *
! INSPECTOR (S): [ofrp//
l FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
f
l Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
.
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
I
\fiSPECTOR(S):
! 'w d SPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 3's-3 r PAGE NO.: h-+7(
1D
~
-
' *
' '
TECHNICAL ' SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: ed' < [ 8' PAGE NO.: 3 b
( REQUIREMENT:
/i,l /;b ro/p '/l w/lro ep,, p en.,L,,,,y j u f yt, ,, Q ',W
/W n,,l fch J
O' .p py ,/
~
/
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: dS~f-MC ISSUE DATE: 2 b.// Y REV.: 6 Tewb Z
TITLE: 3 %~4N l ,
N Jb/gf' d) Tra '~ 2
l } , u r y & ., t a , n -f Hydrc5m/%%'i,.deptS d I,egn,./$ f,y,,9;,,,
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS7 /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or [
cditorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //A
work as written?
##
Has licensee completed procedur walk wn?
REMARKS: /
U &I I 77 amu / f
p r -
r
-
_
-
P
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
l
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHATBY WHEN?
04Y LnMst e Mv3$ fiwI:ze ,o rowduver
INSPECTOR (S): [Crw//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
'
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
j Were any other problems identified? i
OPEN CLOSE0
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
/C1NSPECTOR(S):
'
N5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pf-35 PAGE N0.: H7 )
0
1
!
!
,
* *
,
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET -
TS PARA: Y/[-[,de } PAGE NO.: Y
f REQUIREMEN}; NVrfrocPar ffro m A ,'<,pr y s'raq /' l f/pgcpr
L J 6 /1,or t J,ieX/ / h o ,1 A t. s - W
'
l
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ,Q T4-//o/ ISSUE DATE: //- /fff-REV. : M i
TITLE: hy/rocec,f,+s.b;>rW l-)o / Mere r /i{pe / Nd5 -
l
/ (/ W YES NO !
J
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? // '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #[g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: $ NffY le> h, ' << a fi F P /17forg/of f
ni, I si e r) / /0 / o bP G fr P/) fa ., r -e
' TPr b f/t"cS'
^
./b. ,'l Prr'a Wrn "c-1 ,
_
e
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
M] Lite tMse mAfIMt sprove$ walice) 00wn 0 Vo tt< dd
'
n n e orP orak TS accelh, ae 'e n k A
i '
INSPECTOR (5): / F// /
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES _N0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
!
7SPECTOR(S):
lI
(~5:
( 5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-35 PAGE NO.: 447F
,
-
y
" ~
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET ,,
,
TS PARA: Id[, /. 8,b PAGE NO.: 7 d~ 6
( O REQUIREMENT: M N r' / h#o k( jdpo[G [<%/#<r rgo
'\ ' o (,'a c fcac+/saet{ W Ff - py(3,y jg ,ln ft, S-
-
() /
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: dfT-d%Q ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? y
Is installed system consistent with TS? ,/
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or rf
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #M
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure ikdown? /
REMARKS: /WY h im
Ypr $1
'
f i F-e. // m e d i f f
*
TD#r l O WP/)/n ,ee- P
lM (c)f00fcr k% I
^
/l'/ $pr/ a 0 l
-
r
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
N Liu'ntee snusf issue cworusc], sva(ked down noeda '
TS ctclea kle c vifuD,
'
j c uraHns
( n cor, ,
INSPECTOR (5): rff/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ l
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
i
REMARKS:
[ ] SPECTOR(S):
'
'wb5PECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5--JJ PAGE NO.: h471
I
l
I
-
' ~
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET .[
~
TS PARA: ebr[,2 PAGE NO.:
(~^\ REQUIREMENT: ft)oftbact/ &f n/ }r V/ roc pq m i g,d '
b
O c.,v<v' em- a uwv ~&/ 24 M%
,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: d5 4--6462 ISSUE DATE: 2-//- 95 REV.: M
TITLE: [ M//duaN //, M/Xiac[ve/7% h ,,,c .,c,. o,,y / 7gy/-
'
" ,
[ YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? [
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or g[
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
REMARKS: W i n c> l l > e
'
/
Oromdes f P
/
_
-
STATUS OF ITEM 'h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
l M7 License e m n+ FnwIne procedu
INSPECTOR (S): [0 frp [/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
l
f iSPECTOR(S):
'
k-t.b5PECTIONREPORT 50-458/ 75 -3 f PAGE NO.: AWO
ll
J
r
'
'- '
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: e
*
8 PAGE NO.:
/b M/ y'he- Q CfFm [[e:Fa/ ph
[O) REQUIREMENT:
T, e - C / ~ "I" W f/ v' .9l% n b ,1 + /,s~.
LIC. PROCEDUR NO.: d d-ddd/ ISSUE OgE: ,_J-/9-PfliEV. : 8
TITLE: fax, o,' w ) / N M d ]/ h bi yi%e [vstp% f/ w
'
--
<
(- V .
g /
,-
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? [
Ara there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M[g
work as written?
Haslicenseecompletedprocedurewpkdown?
REMARKS: ,
h&o[r'3f' ./ f c7 c r' /r p
~
-
_
C CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM .OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 W BY WHEN7 *
.We Lice mer m os4 Fim (ize prmM
INSPECTOR (S): [ePrr8/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? :
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
OSPECTOR(S):
'
[ d sPECTION REPORT Pf4J50-458/ PAGE NO.: h-#1/
.,
l
J
7
o -
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 6,6. 3. A.l PAGE NO.: 3/Y G W 6
TS REQUIREMENT: Ve rifv v i s b le < fo u FFvM " << low We nF nch
11ornutllv 9tcessiinIN
,
rsnik 5
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE:
"
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
l
'
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
,
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? d
pf
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
l work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [A
REMARKS: All TonMI are inside unb iam enf u>htch it <unt
rkad ru2-. T'clni4en a re norsally acces < kle . Fa hqu rv 4e
sole p?co <e ' oF looUn af glo J (Ivu wield vr0lsk kokrth.
l
l
STATUS OF ITEM @d CLOSED
I FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7
W AlllL med de$erme%f 11eCessi k FoY IquG $tt 'VerifftYNCen
~htIdne i.14v occovn4- Abh1tN' Cons (AbahWf
,
I
INSPECTOR (S): Farrell
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N0
Were problems corrected? :
i
I
l Were any other problems identified?
I CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
l REMARKS:
l
,
INSPECTOR (S):
l INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-3 r PAGE NO.: A-9fA
-
-
' ~
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET .
,
TS PARA: M, [, d e 3. ,1 PAGE NO : ~N
}}Pr,'& 81,rr& h c- w n f $ [q i,,fffy-
(A'
') REQUIREMENT:
Piior \/
/
9W WovS
~
/
O
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: fJ T4-$d3SSUE DATE: //-// ,Qf REV. : O
TITLE: k \/k/~oTPe S n <'/W 'Tf"ci s'<, k,irni/ /DrnW
# " 8 '
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with T5? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #[q
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
bef ws se. c bo 9cima rv
h
REMARKS:YrorYOt*P
weed. on w A,,,o @rW,L,d
_
,
-
.
~ r
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
'
cM0 (D LTun see Mus& imslement TS pen 2dTaly cu ui<er e,h
'
DSI C@ Lnen ser at & ,nesvade cujrroirsth nuehleach , Ales: 2
INSPECTOR (S): [orf#//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
*
\
/^ ~:SPECTOR(S):
I
' w gNSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7& 3 r -
PAGE NO.: & #7)
1
_
.
-
'
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y,[r d,3, /3 PAGE NO.: 7
/ ^\ REQUIREMENT: ///S vo[ fuepre-/e'an e/ co//r
'
~-Sba Unwn f)b N n t ! s t'l v
l
s'cr arr e rs ib/co
ln Ydrocen t'S m i f,o C
REV.:
LIC.'PROCEd(RE NO.: c2fMd3d4 ISSUE DATE:
TITLE: A)n Ho rpc/urro \/P /
' '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /[4
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? N
REMARKS: So m #
'
e)[ [[p fc
/2;;,./; o /, &
,6 m , '/pr_f
c. y pof
c;;. f f e:7
te l1 / c C.
^
U
-
m
STATUS OF ITEM [M CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? '
k%- h/ItL mv & dc her,%s nettssi}y FW b1spech% hlu% o%]u'
&clavnb A L A tt. h co n srder 'MJ
<
INSPECTOR (S): [eppf/p//
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/
YES N_0
W:re problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
(7SPECTOR(S):
Cd5PECTION REPORT S0-458/ 7 f-M PAGE NO.: A -dP 9
i
,-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 'f. (. . L 3. C PAGE NO.: 3/y4-67
TS REQUIREMENT: Hv/r.ea r,4* r vi s v e l e a m o n J teu e,=6 cAett,
-
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 15 Y - I Gov ISSUE DATE: Y60 /U REV.: 'l
TITLE:
'
YES E
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? v' -
i
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
, editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M*
/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
'
REMARKS: TS resuireme8 will re outre menv
u a g
man -rem
P190$ UV1.
STATUS OF ITEM M CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
d'-3) NitX 4tvN deiYr mint ne cessih fvv t%netfe m inkr'nen s'n h
' '
utoont hbhlk tonsrden.Inl
INSPECTOR (S): fa rre //
FOLLOWUP-ACTION: INSPECTION REPOP.T 50-458/
YES 0
N._0
:
Were problems corrected?
i
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ #f-M PAGE N0.: A-4-P C
J
- -
t
.
f.3 'o
'Y TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 'f. 7, /, /,A- PAGE NO.: 3/e/ 7-2
TS REQUIREMENT: 47~ L f u r- n uc e psn 7/ P4 ys 13 y vsewy/n
rur esa ac/E se M Pt-o u //L7-S Wr s r w r Loces
ff/J- L 4 0 nA D YA fW/f G Sf f*f 44D w f?SJI~/en / f IA 1 7 3 C a w ap.-
"# '
LIC. PROCEDURE N0. : 57F-1M-0).0 / ISSUE DATE: //7//n' REV.: O
TITLE: SWP vntvs t-t "E d VENAcar7ow
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/A-.
Is installed system consistent with TS? w/A7
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /V/jv--
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
&S1 &Whi wur- a n s s e rt~ W M M ps u li
INSPECTOR 15): /V/.d A / 4/M
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected? -
Were any other problems identified? -
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
..
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pi-3.f PAGE N0.: A - 2. P4
k
1
%- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4. p r.1. k / PAGE NO.: M4 7-2.
TS REQUIREMENT: E 4e e 4srou n e rswa ,2-e ru #rc c ; .> nr
e o rtst- s u 7- r pn n o " on + aown reiz-m et wrca_
l- PW / d f f C t.< /z- f 5'/6' WA-L .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 577 ,2n-oto/ ISSUE DATE: z/z 7 /es' REV.: O
TITLE: po nn i. r esva /rr+na,e v Sea New seeiz. Ae rnr,o u
'
V6m erc+now -
ygg yn
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/h
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should [
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
9-ES 2
d-/ / 4. > c-k"r- toa /i-6s~r w&L/u a &
INSPECTOR (S): M. E dvvokv ' '
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N0_
-
Were problems corrected? ~
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pf-35 PAGE NO.: A-M2
i
i
t. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: e/. 7 /. / A. 2. PAGE NO.: .My 7- 2.
TS REQUIRCMENT: 6?ps en m p iu snu % ecvsnem
s 7-+/-r s su a A. -s it.- mu e ss-vi cc w+rcre wu
P /t - f f f e t. A - 46. e j w sk-L.
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:577-2n-ess/ ISSUE DATE: x/2 7/er' REV.: O
TITLE: ivoma Te r vic t /cr noie ns r a vi a vn, a ste ru n rio~ remf i coriw
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #//L
Is installed system consistent with TS? g/1-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? # '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g//-
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
>6h AL/r'i-i vis-wr- ( o ns>-s cr 1 ;+as p o w u
INSPECTOR (,if: M . E. / v h ,e p e /
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? -
:
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
' REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-35 PAGE NO.: 4-M9
~
f
I
X TECHNICAL. SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4, 7 / /. A , J PAGE NO.: 3/v 7-2.
TS REQUIREMENT: Ew- rup ,- sus ,servcram
trwr3 ou A a +ua u r wa u y s wu
FAdw4 M MMw ( n w A .-o L. WHM
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:57/'-2rt -st e / ISSUE DATE: 1_/27/m REV.: o
TITLE: Nom.c Tew e e/crno ev - % <> e r v3 rr-r_ se en nw w micgrisa
YES M
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? / V//,t.
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
[A /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g/J
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
6S? AL//Lt C+wr cA ML6YC v,&L.4 9o Asu
INSPECTOR 1r): d, 8 M.te/,vt
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected? -
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS-7./ PAGE N0.: A -d-99
% TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 8/ . 7. /. 2 ,4 PAGE NO.: Mt/ 7- '/
TS REQUIREMENT: /J. 7- t usr p s -c e. pe et L c-t La ,a e s ev
VGMPWAM- TL Ac- rJM/N vercA. M M m er n D
WA7-fA t- At/f L. 7b ff h'/7'A w TL-Swr L-/^-sI r.f.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:Srr-so0-pap / ISSUE DATE: v/w/rv REV.: o
TITLE: T)A r s- V Afr W kL Y0$$ '
YES N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? A//,L
/
Is installed system consistent with TS? p/4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should [,q.
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
INSPECTOR (8): AV/. f. / V/-rie-rom
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected? -
Were any other problems identified?
-
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
,
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-3 5 PAGE N0.: h-MO
. .-__- . _ _ . _ -. _. . - - - _ __ _ ._-
. .-- . - - . _ _ . . . -
!
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: y 7. /, 2 _ 6 PAGE NO.: 3/q 7 61
TS REQUIREMENT: A-r > w r- we sx 3/ dni av cruyn
7LE cos t , ws_ ruven enr w sm e st z_
l
n-, n , , . c~ ._ - - -- -- ~ c
"# ' '
- LIC. PROCEDURE NO.
- f7p,2rt-o2et -ISSUE DATE: //t;/pr REV.: O
TITLE: Srno rv r,u r a ro ~u. cne p a se w u ry rny-
YES M
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g,/
Is installed system consistent with TS? g4--
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
'
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 7 '
t Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should Ap[/--
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
,
REMARKS:
.
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN O
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
INSPECTORLE): .
A// 6.tv/nM/PY
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
- YES NO
Were problems corracted? -
;
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 2 5-1 5 PAGE NO.: 4-M/
4
_ - . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ , _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ , _ _ _ . _ . . . , _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . . . _ . _. ,
- - . . .. . -. - - -
i
:
.
>
d '
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: df.7.t,4 PAGE NO.: 7 /c,/ 7- r
'
TS REQUIREMENT: A T- z.sssr o~ce re+ / 2. hn av -mey-e.
rur ' tlc csws-* L Hen n -s ~ Mpsn+,m a
LK-r s YL n o 1 tre au T> /a y *f
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 5rF-oso-aaof ISSUE DATE: r/2,/eq REV.: o
TITLE: Ostt y 6 % 1r,m La r s
'
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
_
/V/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? pf4-
j
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
>
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should Aj//A
,
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
-
REMARKS:
,
}
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN @0 SED)
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
INSPECTOR (5[: A d', EM+M#/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected? .
:
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-{r PAGE NO.: 4494-
.
il
I'
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET ,
TS PARA: V 71. h PAGE N0.: 3/v 7-f
TS REQUIREMENT: V ,c x i p v rxx 7 a- S n e s vrren sswrs e
Fr r Ar- t Aur M ou m ver- /+ rw umn oAgreatr
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:,rrp-voz-02e/ ISSUE DATE: /t/n /ev REV.: d
TITLE: s,n wnn, tz a n,- gh M .,~ ri$t v Ds's <t,> si o r-s Tss7~
YES _N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 8/)
Is installed system consistent with TS? p/A-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 6'
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V//-
/j/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
REMARKS:
i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
l
l
l
INSPECT 0RM: /tf , S . d .1 w >/ &
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
.
Were problems corrected? .
Were any other problems identified?
l
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
l REMARKS:
i INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-if PAGE NO.: A- Arf f
l
i
1
-
_.
.
,
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: y, 7. 2. c , /
. PAGE NO.: 3/47-4
TS REQUIREMENT: w t a p ~r w sr a s w r 7ar m es n1'siE s
rv < rem nau s-+ r-c s p- non ec m r la2;
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:fr/ Yv2 -7/0/ ISSUE DATE:
J///p-r- REV.: o
TITLE: /e ss,evier Wrnx& o p- C ~uoi.Ib m Vss riwyro.v i= mris~
'
'
YES _NO
*W
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? A//,4
Is installed system consistent with TS? /v/,4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or v
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 7
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should A,/46:-.
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
A-f fl-1 c M foMLCrC VM MDa JM
i
INSPECTOR ((j: A#,8 A#uezNbr
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
_N_0
Were problems corrected? -
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
l
REMARKS:
!
INSPECTOR (S):
l
INSPECTION kEPORT 50-458/ F.5-35 PAGE NO.: h-44 Y
l
[ _ -_
_.
:
o
*
** TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: t/.7, 1.c.J- PAGE NO.: r/v >-4
TS REQUIREMENT: Vui + .1 w i r+in 7) J , s.prer neao m
on anno u ea sw m scr s e n reu+ p., e + mer/M-
t optpe t'sx ->crp/>- rna s F- wss 7% ~ ia 17f*2
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: Srp-w2-noc/ ISSUE DATE: z/pdsc-- REV.: /
TITLE: sv/,es u c.,~ r,es t. /Esom a, ,e 6 ~ er m a n / a essexo.u f,e rise my;g
*
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #g#
Is installed system consistent with TS? d,/,4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 7 '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should jv,/,g-
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
35Y kML 1 &#W Y t oM l'L CC T%~ W&L MP OWW .
'
INSPECTOR (A): /V/. E _ /v/s /#7
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? .
:
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
l INSPECTOR (S):
1
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5 -Sf PAGE NO.: k 495
1
s
*
-'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4,7, 2. c. ~3 PAGE NO.: 74/ 7-t
TS REQUIREMENT: Vrit-s pv snscurr n pcow a-sme sic Hooo,_ m tt&
hus sansversu H s+>-r rou w w w werwo su
+cc uona- - im a c n-> err
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 3rr-w2-ses/ ISSUE DATE: n/t/ev REV.: C
TITLE: M A-su Mm.o L s% w x./c k av iz-s s-r rc.rg-
YES N,0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? p//
Is installed system consistent with TS? pf/-
'Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? VM '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should _A,//f
work as written?
i
.
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
RENARKS: '$ &cp cro n se op Fr vs7 se c s-s,e-s w e c FEszArm*r m
D /= flow /L1 TE Ff/t- ALA -SE A *T/O -M yr nr M-6 e unl4D
in- c-s- rf r r- 12 ca . Sore.
4
i
i
STATUS OF ITEM M CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
si//L/G w T /MoH/ W //Z-D f d4 /C EP se SA c,AY.
l b5]
i
i
! INSPECTOR ()>h
#/, 8 ,/V /w # #5/.
I
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N,0
Were problems corrected? -
'
i Were any other p nblems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
, REMARKS:
!
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PJ-H PAGE NO.: h-44 t, !
)
i
- . . , . - . - . _ _ ,__..._._ _ _ ,,_ ,_ ,..., _ .___ _., .____,_ _ _ ,,. _ ,
_
_ _ _ _ _ . .
,
_
I
:
.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4, 7. 2. 2 PAGE N0.: 1/u 7-4
TS REQUIREMENT: vs 4,py ev r# ,n pce hr e e rA v c
i o 01 oc tr&r rnnw .< aee ns~ R > ?r 2
LIC. PROCEDURE N0. :pp-wr-r40 Y ISSUE DATE: t/F/rr REV.: /
TITLE: sv/ni- c onrs n (Zo om he (sn oi r>oniac w o n- Fa mesne,e s v.ru
_
YES g
'Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ///4.
Is installed system consistent with TS? fv///-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should gy/ _ -
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
L/PL t c.+ u s' O ns"t L~C uAt#pous/
c% 0
INSPECTOR @6: /v/,8. Map // $r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected? -
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5 -7 5 PAGE NO.: h44')
f
'1
a' '
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: u , 7. 2. e, / PAGE N0.: 7/a 7- 4
TS REQUIREMENT: v s A- w w rL a rLe fic,en n ie-* p,u / se/wr
TL E em awfD M ff'AL T= n- T f A .r A no c + 4 e m sosorscx
dwk i 11 L M J' W ?> MP4f A-7~ f L2 es - W aff=YUOY W e
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:fyr va -c40/ ISSUE DATE: n/r/rv REV.: O
TITLE: M is.i, r m s e_ ILv m /We ) Loa b.rc Tc r r-
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ///fd-
Is installed system consistent with TS? g
Are there any problems with the 1S (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 7
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should p/jf
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7
.
INSPECTOR {ST: ed. E. ev4e./ //~/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? -
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PJ-if PAGE NO.: k-45 8
_ .- . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
D
o' '
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: e/. 7. 2 . e . 2. S PAGE N0.: 7d/ 7-7
TS REQUIREMENT: 1 e4/ ev rA A-T ru a e vrrm u r, > +r- usv
cy/ re-twj pH /L& c 2 j f 7 e p- Loch f) t n.+- t_ .
,/ 1
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: grr vv_ptp/ ISSUE DATE: #4"$$ REV.: O
TITLE: u-.- L . a Div I p, r er u C-rneuran wr no /sryn
I ts t. & n o n if-c runnon- rssr
*
ygs g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /V/A-
Is installed system consistent with TS? v/4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: $'f%ctouer post wor u s+sess es pntol- kom
I'K SS S.t /.C . TLr is n s-r- sp rs t u . rose. Anee s & on e
e J-t 76A i A .
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR 0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
h CLOSED
M{ A NL / c-+xT' wct noE x 1. c + c.c c r.r M ex > W A/A-
1M l #s. o C-tCDit AAS.
/V/, 8 M :f r e p/.A y
INSPECT 0RJS):
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? -
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS- 53 PAGE NO.: A- M1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ____ _ __ .-
s
t
. -
- I
' *
, TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,
TS PARA: 4. 2 7. c. . t_. . A PAGE N0.: 3/v 7- 7
TS REQUIREMENT: VE4rFY TLA 'T ra kvfifM D17M7'w W
qwi re.,+es on nr. s a- r i s r as & L o a c. m ie- > ~ 7'+1w
se - > ms-rv sw m m re x-s - Mic.e
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:rn'-2tv>-cu/ ISSUE DATE: n/ /ea REV.: O
TITLE:, ivi,Li a e n rne e _ x n ~, s.L /r in s- sinre rc rr
- -
'
'
YES g
- Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #//-
Is installed system consistent with TS? /typy
l
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /O '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should @
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: $ A-e e ep r m e citi rem + t= o ir_ c.onrnoc wm
pie.; s e a it. E e o m r+in-e o rv Arm W + 64 c Pst-d rs n *E
pp cr por +cssa w , r >> vn-a T i s- FA-/SML Y w
r e e- n . S s x e '-e
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
&&2 14p/L i c ,s ur 12. 4 s o 1- V E # e_ c fs r#~e-E c-o! TBM4-
Osf'P C M ue8
INSPECTOR (R): /V/.E. #/ < ury
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
,
YES M
-
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS-3J PAGE NO.: A -300
:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
' *
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 7. 2 . ,, , 3 PAGE N0.: t/u 7-7
TS REQUIREMENT: VM t F v 77 a rk r Murre3 Dirsi n rk
1 y t 2.3 /< w n/iv e u rrsrrn w Mesrto m e wirM
A+-Sc A -ryo -19 7f
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:pp--vor-/too ISSUE DATE: lo/,24v REY.: o
TITLE: stA m e Co m n Ksm /k ! x r ,e rN /lcs rna. Citon rv psy-
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? y/st
Is installed system consistent with TS? V/4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 4 '#- '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should p/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
I
REMARKS: F Te e-11 . f s s e. /-s P E n s ^ -c E J MSI k r/o-)12T
sup nie ste r Aeoesonsc A c e e n w c1 M -A4fM ~l%# -
l
[
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
M ALPfL) MW M S D L VE P & ff6464 'Cf 14' MMWCd
p & 7- f- f .r=-o re-- />A/SI - A 'D O
INSPECTORyr): A /, 8 /2 X,x / W y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
! YES N0
Were problems corrected? -
i
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F 5-35 PAGE N0.: N-3DI
. _ - _ .
t
.
* *
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4, 7.1. /. p e/ , 7, 2,7 PAGE NO.: 3/q 7-7
TS REQUIREMENT: ASresr AJ 6 /4 f n res. Bwx /1 no
C #-M em Ao ru 6 s it dwx xpru t=+e+ surw-
DL c 9 M /2 L L T*E & f f L ,4-c A~ 5 / 1 S M
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:5r# voz-Ju/ ISSUE DATE: 3/r /e r REV.: O
TITLE: /p Su vic s rs?rwc of- r _ ne c t M Yrnrn-pnsu
'
Fr u rano~ .r y s r c m YES No
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? M/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? 7
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? t/
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
M 'l A-/fL r on Y c D .w t f 4- f Y L M P D W h *'
INSPECTOR (M: /5/8 /8-A a #y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? -
Were any other problems identified? :
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
~ REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS-35 PAGE N0.: A--3 0 4
*
.. . TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: '/. 7. 3 . a. PAGE NO.: 3/'/ '7-P .
TS REQUIREMENT: D*bE+fd. Ili N*nO[*[r, NIM *I bm r ik $[rb, die
eM .4 *e Gao
is
a Id,/3.+k .J.. . a.)2
e x.+
v
.e r.E'1.I
i.ac.
%
'. 7 ,, h '#,kvWe,mi
e ,e.re m....J rh.~
J e. oc.+er Ad.,or.,a'./c
, ,.- <.,er. a u t,r,.,. .
'
's>v.J :AJ 4. a.a ft.a e La., ;r 1. +k. e.,r.d .,,,s.-kl .
.
'
bC. PRbCEDURE N0.: 5N acer opo/ ISSUE DATE: p/f/hY REV.: O
TITLE: RCIC b.Ickaroe '
beM Elf
' '
J V.fi ' Limo \lerl cdim
'
hES N00 /.*[.:-d _
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? L-
Is installed system consistent with TS? u
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: fra <- Gehmt 1. l . I . / l. 3 , // 3 , a.I 'Tk e_
rd.e-e A T.C. s.&..ss 'd..Jf he b'.'7 2.a.I . v.7.2.<.2,
l .ad 4 '7. 3. < . '3
A
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
l
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST g0 WHAT BY WHEN?
l CMS C.rreek T. S . r.t.reu.$ neh. m %mb.rc l. ebb a.(ede.(LT(t4ne
twcc$ yvowAswt)
INSPECTOR (S): D. L . D2o <s
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
, INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ f5'-35 PAGE N0.: A -303
1
!
,. .' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4/.7.2.lr- PAGE NO.: 3/y 7-P
TS REQUIREMENT: M /,.rf . c. oor 90 Jw e iv oe r.1,*,, 444 & Roc %o J.o.lp r
'
a Ct.s , C nr.L L or .a) % LeN N L 't$ $d Slea eJL NdL N cyr% \
ws...h: +. s t.:L:.) 1" ..A.- ,r.~.. Ama x - ico,,r.r .*
'
LIC PROCkDURE NY.: 57BJo?M?od. ISSUE DATE: br2@ REV.: .hrah
TITLE: RcIc f Fla Tesi- '
YES N0, f$[gp
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ~ v
V
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
e
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
INSPECTOR (S): 3. L . D2o _r
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
! YES _N0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
l
REMARKS:
l
l INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FE-35_ PAGE N0.: h-30 V
,
l
_. _._ __ _
.. . TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 7 3.c -l PAGE NO.: 3/4 7-9
TS REQUIREMENT: P. r L 'm . . r.,rk .m 4 d.d V.sf a 4.;I, ,,e LJ. A m m JJe) s.d de.
. A L., J mu J a.L' WL A..J.e ut.,a L A.a . f4 acLAz 4. %
'
r... A u.4.n. Add 1 'aA.Z Y <aL.d ..de +L. reaet.e vant.( 6e exc LkJ .
LIC. PRbCEDURE NO.: trhao,-ego / ISSUE DATE: a /pr MEV.: O
TITLE: Ecic rWauS IiM m R.aNreah o.3 'Ereid,m AduAm
'
g pg,g _
' '
YES
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
Is installed system consistent with TS? _
V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or l/~
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: e) Proc rbs /././ a ) J. / - 7 S. rde a ria. iac.criaci.
al Aoc h 7.I.4 : Th_ Aczc T... Drctd m eccef rk.ule b e
am ~ c A or.% r +a cf s '7 2.C . 3i Proe s% 7. 3.B : Rc.rc LA
r Jb.b G.h.k e .d.94-4 A 7 2. iii M b. in.Mm s q w J u s.s
ssoor r=s t pes e r- 4 cup q.g. g ,
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
h CLOSED
-
'
4f L 4Sf/Trd$1'eib
.
u
LI ~ ten 1eL ntsr{$ Lofr t f l' rot!Av**
1
INSPECTOR (S): D . L . D 2. , c
FOLLCWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
! .Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 6 - 3 5 PAGE NO.: A-30J
. _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ . . . __ __.__- _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ . _
.. .' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4. 7. 3.C. - 3 PAGE NO.: 3/t/ 7-9
TS REQUIREMENT:
V.,L L 4Ld n ,r.st,- nli J,o.fon [ [ lea ,[or.cd.,- A ,e a w.0
4. Leo .n L .flw 4.sk has ca% e lev sfean is Nu a /4) la '4L. -k.ch .h e d S
orasc.,[d Isb + 15* - O Nrh .*
'
'
L'IC. PROCEDURE NO.: sIf ##7-a[op ISSUE DATE: A4/,PS~ REV.: C
TITLE: dCIC W rte '
m F.So o Teci- '
YES N0 ghg_
Is.there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v
Is installed system consistent with TS? 7
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V '
,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that.it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: See. rf,e 4 /. /. L . 4 8 a.1 T T. ro be roues are
tscorreed- e.3 sk d8 f '/. 7 3 -
_
.
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
dip C rre d TS. r-d. <e wM=re k pre <_. rf e s /./$ 1 =M
l a.t C Licem er wed geneLA
l INSPECTOR (S): D. L. D1eJ
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
l YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS- 3 5 PAGE NO.: A-- 3 0 C,
L
.. .' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 7 3.C.3 PAGE NO.: 3/'1 r7-9
TS REQUIREMENT: LCu Ykl 4Le rude., Er 4Le RcIc nd,~ ir domdiedfp
4e d .creJ [ee n %ee O EsS cLa e Mk 4a L su,$c..tn.n ocei en a '
c.J. s.L rtr . bk d., I.*l .8$ r..J -.I ea a tu m w cr a h t s d .c & .I- 4.'d
"
#NO.'* PROCEDURE Nb.:gre Go9-o6eyISSUE DATE: J/y/pg REV.: O
TITLE: Sctc Lcd L a- r- Ett
'
YES N0 U8[pe_
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V
#
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or v
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? // '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should V
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
m
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): b . L . b3.1
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES &
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ <P5- 35_ PAGE N0.: h-3 0 7
1
,
' '
- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: '/ . 7, 'f PAGE N0.: 2h 7-/O
TS REQUIREHENT: SA aoxEn rn <weis t ne s Mautumes;
.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE:
g
'
YES
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: nu a our o p- 1 s no ,e n p ar e r n, r es ~ irrscs
nn .-r ,r r -, i i- s it s / o i' o c on -e s .
Ewnn e r T. r r er sos ie e o w r ! .ou w on w .
STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
c%f M PLie-s w r um t'w 7T Mw copus6 ps yslM6 msg
/srm s s up vs-w w a w .
l
INSPECT 0Rpff: jvf. f. / W m sz-p hs y
l
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? -
:
l
Were any other problems identified?
i STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
!
INSPECTOR (S):
l INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS -3I PAGE N0.: A -?o?
!
I
!l
.
' '
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: t/,7. 4, / /. 4- PAGE NO.: r/c/ 7-/ F
TS REQUIREMENT: n r- L6M r pmE nsr_ 9 93 yj gy m ,py,n
rLr M uvs s-> a r ,- o ~ r A -> a o us- ru ru ni .-/ uoiao1e.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:sf-2.r'l-0/ 0/ ISSUE DATE: 4/2 r/pv REV.: O
TITLE: fuel / % rr m s.~ 14.wz Sy.rrr,. r isf,n,y, , Wis.rsa y,i-we cl.se/c
YES .N0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Ap/,4-
Is installed system consistent with TS? 7
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or s'
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM M CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
<~ ro-t Ae P a w".
Mf Mh i e-+d c.omA Ert
.
INSPECTORCir): / v/ , E . /tds ,e #/.*y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? -
'
Were any other problems identified?
l
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
l
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
i
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ M- 3J PAGE N0.: k-301
l
!
- _ _ _ ___
E ;
.
l
.
.' '
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4. 7. (. /, / A PAGE NO.: r /u 7-/r
TS REQUIREMENT: s.; cess, sues- prit 71 o m e nv e r s-is- r/ a 71.c
ELferstie Mor 4 D&tvw F/M Sn/M.cr/ou n ,P w oor m n
IT Fo it- A-r- L-G-A.-f7' / C M wa TG r w st6 cs s'z-c-Ht.4 7?oA F Le J.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO. : frr-2r/- ou/ ISSUE DATE: r/, 7 /ev REV.: rL-. O
TITLE: p f o r o 12 n < eu /=r ne 1%, p assuest i rv 7~ e s'r
YES j@
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /V/g
Is installed system consistent with TS? y
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 7 '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
l
STATUS OF ITEM M CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
-
,
l k?D /J- Pf' L- l c-A-6 Ce m h.4',K vft.) Crow.
l
INSPECTOR (S):
l FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
l YES 0
N_0_
Were problems corrected? .
( Were any other problems identified? -
l STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
l REMARKS:
l
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ # $ - U PAGE NO.: h-31O
I
-----..----A
.
'
.
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4, 7 6, /, /. c PAGE N0.: 3A/ 7 -/F
TS REQUIREMENT: /L r tr+sr nee su r i ons av niei + vns-
7th e E nci+ v+ L uc ,
a + &as- u . swer s w m o a+ ann +ric,
W 7L6 P L /k/ Yk 7 /t /S 1& JrT rasL/-f FM /03) 7/D AJ
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:frF-2r/ -swuISSUE DATE: w/t r-/g y REV.: o
TITLE: Mt P/t-o 7- warras TYf VL V /bstrs:w CX
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? r,/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? g/,A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g,/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
,
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
>?l A- ML! c+M eo HlGrE v/> M O p ud
INSPECTOR (S):
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES &
Were problems corrected? <
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 85 TJ PAGE N0.: A-3 fl
!
I
'
. _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ .
,
t
O
*
' ~'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 7. 4 . / ,/. / PAGE N0.: 7/c/ 7-/ t
TS REQUIREMENT: A-r i nr r o nc s p s iz. ir no a n>> c vecc
f+w r>s fr+4r c as s i. W s i n u ets w ps-rn w eo u s- s r- w .cr
ost -f Coss /F LJ.~~T C YCLE S f- P.4// TM -#-V*&L
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:#-2El-oral ISSUE DATE: 7/7//rv REV.: O
'
TITLE: Pi,< e. /mmW w%rre VA-c.vt & ve e.s Tc.1 r-
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? A/,4
Is installed system consistent with TS? p/A
- Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V .
,
Does the. procedure walkdown indicate that it should Ap/,p-
work as written?
- Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
2
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
blok /Af f L. o c A-~T c3 &Lf rX~ UALK0$WW
INSPECTOR (d: M,6 Nme_,r//N
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? .
:
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS-J J PAGE NO.: A-31 A
.-. .. . . - - - _
_ - _ _ - . . . - _ . - . ---
_-. - _ _ _ _ _
_: -
.- .' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4. '7. L / . /. e.. / I
PAGE NO.: J/t/ 7-/9'
TS REQUIREMENT:sp-Est .7.t.t.I.e
FY rursun fi n sn tr a rssos ra m p
g r-s-s e
-rs SfJasprau w no o 4-s-+ t.o o s e es+r r- Isa oppm
& r- n s n rac s >>cs-o s r- 3 r/ J-se r.
LIC, PROCEDURE NO.:grp-gr/ -ou/ ISSUE DATE: J/t/rr- REV.: 1
TITLE: Par /% m e F m rt owA e - 'rerr~
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? r,//g-
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that.it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM N CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
kl.2 A-ML / LAM epm /?L.SYC V 4t E.0 O w W .
INSPECTORhEd: M . 6 M , , x .< w c-/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ff-Jf PAGE NO.: k-113
_ . - _ _ _. . -
__ __-
I
,- .' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: 4.7.4././6. 2 PAGE NO.: 7/c,e 7-/9
'#' '# ' I' C Yct E ab$%2t }l~ in rte m pxrn
~
TS REQUIREMENT:* Y'
7L/pr i S usr W crnet a panws-PLnurer wr7ou Mom
W L.fA- f 64 c-o m s t f rs* CY ct e. o f- f ,t L- L TM L-.
LIC. PROCEDURE N0. :pf. 2//-0601 ISSUE DATE: 4/a,/,-a- REV.: O
TITLE: IV sv fowa- Fws brnrwd t/sr u. V>eus Cver t wir-
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? F/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? pp
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or e'
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 7
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should fv/ff-
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
MV AfPLI LawY C DM PL 676 wwCO Du &
INSPECTOR (M: /V/, d p V / u e # # c/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S): '
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS-JI PAGE NO.: h-A l Y
,
.
. . - . - . ..
.- :.' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4,7.L/./.1, PAGE NO.: 7/v 7-/ 9
TS REQUIREMENT: '/Ex fo am + r i. o v resr ' s r- -rce. s ys rem w
+cconos ces wira CWrsn .r Treno~ // ss- M reas~ tr,rse.r;o~
ideNsnooQ J4/ Nff/ 7/9N .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:ffp-2.f7-o7oe ISSUE DATE: 47,/# r- REV.: /
TITLE: Po s-t Pa. ore criau m.rix sv, rex 2 vcu f tse re rr
g
_
YES-
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? pff
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or y
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v' .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should A,.,-/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? . V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
5 15 A-fPL / C-/3-r7' CAM /L/TE WM)C DWW .
e
INSPECTORQEd: JV/, 4~. /VAe A.s// sf
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
'
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S): '_
.IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-3f PAGE NO.: 4-315
_ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ , _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . _ _._ .... _._ __. ,_,
'
,
.
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
T5 PARA: 4. 7 t . /. 2 4 . / PAGE NO.: .7/q 7 -/ 9
; TS REQUIREMENT:N' I' ** * * ' VE/tif v 7Le es, e c OA-v r.+wk u wv&_c
A- 7 a.- 6 + 1 r 300 x + t e. o " r o A e n s t- no s w r- rr t w t=-
cize m m ai w r e onpi r2 o~s ++o wenrs rne- +r t c.+->r .7m n.+ra.
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:fp-M7-s u.7 ISSUE DATE: r/1/ev REV.: B g Tcu s5 e/4
TITLE: Or s s s_ i_ >=su A s A/s e xt v espu rion+u Ter7-
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
//AL.
Is installed system consistent with TS? #///--
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #,f'p__
i
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
>16 Af6?L1 ck" r to m. / l 4 YE' wel. K DowW .
/v/, /i~. #/. t e-s v ey
INSPECTOR (f0:
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7f- E PAGE N0.: A-1/6
i
,- . TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: e/. 7. /, . /, 2 . A PAGE NO.: 7/47-/9
TS REQUIREMENT: v u u=Y TLn- r n ^s +mst s n- p>sset fnec pia.a m u
FviE L sTost-#1-f TA ^ . e d TA-/ v ff) i N- A-c t ostDAper W/7's+ />f7M
p2 7D-75 i r wtrWsw TLE 4- c e E P D 4 r / L A M / r.T Sf6&>Fifo /ov /H1'm D9?.T-??.
'
C SP- o r 11 L//6 f t r GP
LIC. PROCEDURE NO. :fres- m-#,oo ISSUE DATE: i,/ u / p r - REV.: o
TITLE: CJP-O'D : cNf,.<irnc.y S.<usuunes o+ ne pierst L es k m,,r
trf-**o-ro** : Te cinte *' f*** "'+r?'"s r.m-osu~u ygg
s', sos-n , y9
eorts.<ie,+y%.o,om ,se.,+u -
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
A/AL
Is installed system consistent with TS? sv/,4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should p/,4_.
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
>7/ M fLIco-A 7 c 0mh/TT W4L kD b Mov.
t
INSPECT 0Rpl1: W1. E sv/s a /H y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
l
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
,
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FN.5 PAGE NO.: A-317
i
l
i
, . _ . . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . . _ _ . _ _ _
r
l
,- , TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: f.7./, /.2. c PAGE NO.: 7/y 7-/ f
TS REQUIREMENT: L s s e c. r rLe o s s r s t. ro s n. insps criw iy
A- cc o s-os-~c s virs ra oc-cpas e nesna o w e a .~s u w e rion.
W/Y& JTS MA A st FA-C ra Af4 L /ZL cAetMwbA-rJDN9 Fs t 7A G CL4ff oJ#
2/2 7/pr - # ' " '
LIC. PROCEDURE NO. t :fr/ 2r/-7#2. ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE: 9/e r g e. -/ ri ec 4 -p /+ r es e naa
'
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Ate
Is installed system consistent with TS? 7
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that.it should [ '
work as written?
i Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
! REMARKS:
.
!
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
h CLOSED
-
,
i kN /W FLicA ur contro g rc WA-l gpa u sv .
I
'
INSPECTORM: M f. E A 4 u x / sy y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
l
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
.
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-If PAGE N0.: /t-3fP
Y
l
- - . _ , -. -_ _ - - - _ _ - _ - . - . _ . - _ _ _ . _ _ - _ _ . - . - . . . . _ , _ _ _ _ . , .. _ .-,
.- . TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4.7./..A7,a../ PAGE NO.: 3 /v 7-2 o
TS REQUIREMENT:
# 4 ' ?' ' ' ' ' * * ~
VEnwv rs > r rLE ELeerxotvrestat
- sf fktH c E L L. 15 ALdoU& TLL /?L MW1 A AO "IL $ OVMed-L L. fAL.776/C y
Rf Wil. Vn L C-A-6- C ff L /t tkrfA rLAN DA dhkL ro 2- V yet r.l .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO. :Sn'-2c/-//00 ISSUE DATE: 3/5-/rg - REV.: o
TITLE: ut m v O> erst Fw fuA if+ rrs x y M r7-
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /5/A-
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or y
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should t/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
,
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
l ,
l
&?] AL//t. o n r' co"r A &rc v44 Ko a vu.
INSPECTOR %:
M, f. A ep// sr
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 9 5 - 31 PAGE NO.: A JI9
}
_ _ -
l
,- [ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET l
l
TS PARA: ef. 7. L / 7.6 PAGE NO.: 3/q 7-20
TS-REQUIREMENT: YE*t Fv rLxr- rx e <stespic s-nw rv n u/sormet
po ,e. eparwa s o res vic.E or rts a nrrssy.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:fTr-Ar/-upo ISSUE DATE: 947/ # REV.: O
TITLE: Gu u mi v Di srs t F i re. s Amp d+rrec i a-v G axe.m
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /s;do-
Is installed system consistent with TS? V
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or t/
editorial)?
<
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
~
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
!
work as written?
, Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
,
l
1
1
' STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
" -1E0 A-//L- 1 CW Y C-9m / L 67Y VflXDD W
INSPECTOR ($d: A/. E /1// a / // t
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES ,NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
l
,
INSPECTOR (S): -
l INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS- Jf PAGE NO.: 4-fu
1
i:
I
,- . TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
4.7 4 1.3.c.l
u,7.r,./.7.c.2_ PAGE NO.: 7/9 7-20
TS PARA:
TS REQUIREMENT: VEmr y rts r rue ssrr w / ease 3 no arre m pen
wow wo w ea +c w oi e-s-n ou oc pesies e ps-mur ox adnowm.
ogzyz toit an/N Axo T6M u>-s t- conse-rvo #5 ME C L6 D4N7 p S,gpp, l
LIC. PROCEDURE N0. :f77-2f/-/tod ISSUE DATE: M/2 r/n- REV.: o
TITLE: /7 Iv/on rn Dierst Fise &N B+rrsey harit wcr
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #/4-
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? z/ '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that.it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
l
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? *
N/ /,L ppt i c.-p.u 7 - com pt.67w vs.c xo oww .
INSPECTOR ($d: JV/. E. / V/a A p M Y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any.other problems identified?
!
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
[ REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S): '
,, INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ TJ -15 PAGE N0.: _/c-3>/
l
,- - TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: e/, 7. / . 2. .at, PAGE NO.: 7/q 7-22.
TS REQUIREMENT: vs sei F v rt+ r as-c.s up.vs ,na p r a ,z.
offurso ex. Au romsr,c , w 7%c P i- s v Nrs is jn i, g .
r rseseser // rs 77o^ .
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: ST/-2f/-m ISSUE DATE: fo/2 r-/ry REV.: o
TITLE: Fix 6 l' m WA-rsst-- $* y r VLV [ori_ snow CK
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //A
V
Is installed system consistent with TS? jv,/A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or v'
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should p/'#
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
REMARKS:
)
\
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
APA ALffLicd d con /L 6 7 C us-i tpod.
INSPECTOR (Sf: /: /, f. /V/u fz.///p
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any. Other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
l
INSPECTOR (S): 1
)
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5-.25 -
PAGE NO.: MDA l
l
l
._. - - . _ . . . . _ . . . _. .. -. . . _
. .
.- . TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4. 74 . 2. . f PAGE NO.: 3/V 7 -2, 2_
TS REQUIREMENT: Cvcte cm ra srn sia vs t ys in 7-A s
1:Lpu nra rL +o n e-u. s-r te.a-rr we e s m m s r-e evet4
- o N- p -s c t. Tit w SL
'
LIC PROCEDURE N0. :fr/-257-ar0/ ISSUE DATE: 7/w/fq REV.: o
TITLE: Fiit s Fu rre non- vs-rss- 41l &va.e 72 r7- YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ///A t.
Is installed system consistent with TS? g/g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should pfA't-
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
(
>P3 kWLie A+-r comPLS77 vst.Xb o ww.
I
INSPECTOR (3d: /v/. E. /v/u.,ca v
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
'
.
! Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSLD
l REMARKS:
!
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ff-Jf PAGE NO.: 4 -h-J
-.
.
O
.
*
- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
4 . ~/. 4 2 . c. . /
TS PARA: 4*7#* * # */* * PAGE NO.: h 1-2 2.
TS REQUIREMENT: frx priz.,,r x ryrrr s we rions.i rss r waien ,ac w es ,
sima carr o - n u s-oan-r , - ura s r son a rv nu ra n,.,,- r vire m m.
yf / F '/ 7XA-r 7A f A*9TDMA Tie vnL V$f iH TE_ f PLOW fA -T~M # L 7". ; ,,gl r~aC',
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:5T/>M/'441 ISSUE DATE: /O/zr/fy REV.: O
TITLE: Fiis E Ae-ore c rvow fra-suiea sie. S nys&t R, &c rs o"+ c Ter7
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ApdL
Is installed system consistent with TS? p///-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v' '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
f/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS ,
l
!
'
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7 .
'
At- / P L / c,+ w T co M A67Y h%MDo wW .
*> '3]
INSPECTOR (st): 4 /' 4~. /vArer#v
,
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FJ-3f PAGE NO.: A-3M
..
.
*
- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
4. 7. C . L.C.1.
TS PARA: 4. 7. 4. z.c.,7 PAGE N0.: % 7- 2 2-
TS REQUIREMENT: tasster rLe cie-y Pips rsn+ v wo sasiuktsa asuss s e
ro v uti f 4 7L m A inree mrr 4- n-r> &ACH O .6 LsM-G M 2 % L 6 L ffy y
it.hS J N V6M F Y TL LY TkL 1/it# Y /A17Psts- JS A or- #417sewerEP .
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:f7/-2r/-7to/ ISSUE DATE: /o/27/rv REV.: O
TITLE: Foc-e t'x rn ri o u ht.wutsie isssorg/xo2ze.s 1-uscr>oa
YES N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //AL
V
Is installed system consistent with TS? /v//A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 7
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /v,/4-
. work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
.
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7
.
l MS AL//Lyc- W T s*Om/LdTf WA-L]L DJWW.
!
INSPECTORQV): yV).B.//uA/s
V V
l FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
( Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
l
l REMARKS:
l
l INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff -If PAGE NO.: A -34J
ll
i
l
~
.
*
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4,7.4.2.d PAGE NO.: 7/c/ 7 -2. 2_
TS REQUIREMENT: feit.pnte u a s se s, a n, pre se. pua re r -r. nuuu sw
sss e i+sno ssies-v no rww cc se- i m o s se. svr reu m wipyac
&MM #/Asv />6h 0 e >*st-k */ ND 2 Z L e sun JY4%/WkL$/t. M/Jfygsz q VffSp ,3 ppsaggyg
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: f7f-2D-07s/ ISSUE DATE: //fo/rf- REY.: C
TITLE: Fin Ao rs e nsa SmunsN Sver>rm 1 wn m m.ow 7ttr
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? / V,/,4
Is installed system consistent with TS? AfA- /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or p-
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that .it should / V,/4--
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
}f{ ff-ffLI &&sv7~ CDsv1/f. 8 FE WA-L X DDW N
INSPECTORCit): )vf.f./v/.<xs,+v
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pf-If PAGE NO.: 4-34
- _ - , . __
.,
'
I TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/ . 7 4. 7. o PAGE NO.: 7/c,, 7 -2. J
TS REQUIREMENT: ALT LAk rT" wu2. /76A. 7/ Oss v 1 RV W/z-19 ssin
rLi>.-r fn en w we u nac; frus n-. pns-,s- rso on u ra m-nc,
id rLR- Fa-o J PA rH sr sH srs e r n-A-a w- Psrs rs oN .
1
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: ST/'-2.r7-043 SSUE DATE: g//7/ff- REV.: O
TITLE: Ivfo urw-c. v PG e c- //& Tvrrem Vaiss fan-sou CLScdc.
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V/sG -
Is installed system consistent with TS? g/
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? t/ '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
l ,
> ?) ALrroc n 7 e c u ri. c-r wA- -sc oo w k.
1
INSPECTOR %: /v/ E. /v/sx av
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
A-h-7
I
I INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ?.5- 3 PAGE NO.:
1:
_ _ _ _ ._- _ - . - - - . - - - - - - - _ - - . ._,
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . .. _. _
,- . TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4. 7, 4 . 7. 4 PAGE NO.: 3/4 7-23
TS REQUIREMENT: M L su r- p~cc ps a. 4 - , ~ ra- s ,7 v vase m vi a
//qtop rr, s ur rwie we wer swo mira ne .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:ffp-25 7-eyv/ ISSUE DATE: r/n/uq REV.: O
TITLE: P G t" c 14xt w rnwr %x pur//Msraxt CLcer
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 Af/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? /t///J.
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /s[/g-
work as written? i
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
h CLOSED
.
>-7Y #ffLtc W T U M LGrf w%LLDou A/
INSPECTORC54: /V/ 8. /vfu ftp// e
FOLLOL'UP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO j
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PJ-1( PAGE N0.: k-hp
.. .
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
. . .
.
*~
.
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
q . 7. 4 . 3. c . I
TS PARA: 4. 7. t . 7 c . 2 PAGE N0.: J/q 7 -).J
TS REQUIREMENT: Vuis v ru rvr7sm 3-cra +rs <- n m ,u ws w p
k rm +ru.st-y s- ~ /> n/wm n t'ow rss r ruou ca seme r
no asz us e ro nssaxe wo eu e,uce
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:pp-2/7-0M7 ISSUE DATE: Ply,/sv REV.: O __
TITLE: PGCC Ou w fvir w Ac.rarvow no PLos Tyr r
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g,/jf.
Is installed system consistent with TS? p/A-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? If
gg
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written? }
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:.
.
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
.
INSPECTOR %: /V/, E . v/apa y'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g'
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ TS-35 PAGE NO.: A-3&9
.. .
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: % 7. 4. V. a- PAGE NO.: 7/</ 7-2 y
TS REQUIREMENT: Vi r n +t t v^ inspeor ;=sies nors 17+rious
- A-cenndLE P a w s-- /L % r D/Su rton rp Mirax1 u t.
Leg u r /LCD E&ui/m E n ir 16-7- -rk t frA- r?oM
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:f7p #/ -720/
.
ISSUE DATE: 9/m,/f y REV.: o
TITLE: i~i tz e L ra ce rson- flos s f 7+ ruw /es /scrio u _
YES 0
N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? p/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? r/A-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or e-
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should A/4-
work as written?
j Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
l
.
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT CY WHEN?
.
emf /WFL t t-s-wr esmsj.x rf W4t-AcDs & .
INSPECTOR (Y): /t//, f. /t4 fcM y
'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES _N0
l Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM' OPEN CLOSED
j. . REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7f-if PAGE N0.: 4~ 310
*
.
L
'
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: # .14 . 4/ . f . / PAGE NO.: 7 / 54 7-At/
TS REQUIREMENT: Vi s w_ i n c erion ,, , f , a i.,4,s s c n>rion s
n r- seeesnstE o a x-i n P L,4 ~ r- <>sen m u r., n < ra er
t
A. t. L. - M duri-6/1 80s4 i#M fA-7* ff Al- ~/ TL F WWJ o &
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE:
*
YES NO
V
r betwean FSAR/SER and TS?
Is there any diffe' ence /[A-
Is installed system consistent with TS? p,/p
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? # '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should v
work as written?
'
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? t/
$ Wo
~
REMARKS: eie-o e s owne wiz-i 7ts" f s re- rtis s eca
S/s c . re -s a u i sum ss-7
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
eMO /L- W L i c- w r- D A /E t o / G ,. i r r or s n.~o ,~su-xt? w "
fuexonas p., x rt,s rr ci.i . sse e . i rw
INSPECTOR $: / V/. 6 A 4 ,c p e y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95-M PAGE NO.: A-DJ
-
.
m
__ . ..
"
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
*
4. 7 4. 4. b. 2-
TS PARA: #.7. 4. '/. b. 7 PAGE NO.: J/4e 1-2y
TS REQUIRENENT: /Lem o vs- ne swss p-sit. i.n is c r:, os up
g4 -u-exws- wo im /scr ail urxe rs no san mc
AL D 2W4 06 O C /kfA6 rl /W TA-E c osA P 1_ ist__ f
- LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:577-2n-ne3 ISSUE DATE: r/,7/rv REY.: o
TITLE: Pi x.c /% remo" Mor a 4+cx Amu /ns/s m ou
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /V/A-
Is installed system consistent with TS? p/'g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
' editorial)?
Does' procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /v/g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? t/
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
'
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
..
&9{ # rtti us-~ r com Asrr wncxpswu .
INSPECTORQU: JV/. E . ////a xAs& Y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0,
.Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?.
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
l- . REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S): '
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95" V PAGE NO.: M3A
1 -
.
-. _ . - _ . . - . - - ..___. . . _ .._...._,_, _ _,. _ - _ . _ . . _ . -
__
_
m-- -
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: eA 7. 4, V. c PAGE NO.: 34 7-2r-
TS REQUIREMENT: fu ris t uv pseu cun issrtsgrios yng yo
VsHA Y v/LL vt ops M ossirv wo no puow irt scuse no
r o upa c r- nor E N- v o n or rs rst if.r r.
LIC. PROCEDURE N0. :fT#-2r/- 0702. ISSUE DATE: 7/zy/pr- REV.: /
TITLE: Fisee fur x eriop wnrcse- hrrse r vem ftow )~s g
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? ///A
Is installed system consistent with TS? //vA
-Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 7 '
,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should jvA' -
/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM P
(DPEfD CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7 .
ML At.p PLtc-o w r cox/ t-Src wtxosxW.
INSPECTOR ($4: M'. 8 /r//a /ep/7y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
.
INSPECTOR (S):'
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-35 PAGE NO.: 4--h3
.
. , , , ,_.v. - - - _ . _ , , , _ . - - . , _ _ _ _ . _ . __~ .c ....,, -
-
l
., TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: L/. 7. 4.fm PAGE NO.: 7/a 7-i_7
TS REQUIREMENT: A-r t us r rues su 7/ n vr tr v t/ir u + < > Hssenw
,
r p- 11.s a vonnr nor s sours rs arra r ma a suius eene
n nr ru n sort a-ourz.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 57#-257-7102. ISSUE DATE: //rf/rv REV.: e e rwpt;.ott
TITLE: ft A 6 // v oun 7- Nocs /do e r e fo ~ri+ e. y snus cr 7op
YES 0
N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /V/A
,
Is-installed system consistent with TS? jv,/A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V *
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should jv/g'
,
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
t
REMARKS:
.
4
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
- .
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? ..
; MJ >9-//L 1 c. s-~r com st 6rf wm Ac D owA/.
l
INSPECTOR (M: / V/ 8 . M ., u // Sr'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES ,NO
Were problems corrected?
i
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN JSED
REMARKS:
"'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-JJ PAGE NO.: M3'I
.
.
"
. . . , - .- m
. _ _ -
.
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: 4, 7. 4, .C h PAGE NO.: 3/c/ 7 -2- 7
TS REQUIREMENT: A- r uc6sr ne e se rie. 4 ,, o n ra .c py a, , y s,s e
in-r /s c rixc- s +c a. v+no sia //- y can no n ,< unn
1% r- r5-f M VDAJ47 2 >L A s2 E L ti DA- Y is:no r t + r TA.L M Y M 4 # 7 /f & > r '
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:f7f-2f/-1Yo/ ISSUE DATE: g/2./,/ry REV.: o
TITLE: Fne e tivow r- wr/e c rio"
g
'
YES
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /v,/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? pf,#
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 4 7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 7 '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should h /jg_
f
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: __
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR ."0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
<M'( A-M Lic.A w'r' vom / t fif w e t. M o r w w .
IllSPECTOR$: Jt/, f. Wbs st-PA' Y
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
.
' '
INSPECTOR (S):
'
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95-h PAGE N0.: /4-19f
3 .
.
- -- ,, ,, -
- __ _-
.- -TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
,
TS PARA: 4.7.4.f.c._. PAGE NO.: $/q 7-2 7
TS REQUIREMENT: psa weru rt vue s i,e r a y pit. e t- n os s- iwss,
ofesssa sy eo "ouon m i L - o -ru /,t.ose a vox o, enru;-
Jt. 619 L /}-CCM 6 A. 7' A&D P L. O W C/.1-4 & /C. ,
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:gA2f/-Jf0/ ISSUE DATE: 1/r/fx/ REV.: O
TITLE: %s /hressW Annus. Pk.ow mcx. +~o Aloss //yox.o
'
YES _N_O_
/'*IN'#
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? A.//A-
Is installed system consistent with TS? pfg
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should jsA/
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? s/
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
[0h
.
INSPECTOR {2Q: /s// . 4~. /t / 4W V
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES .N_0_
Were problems corrected?
Were any otner problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):'
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-U PAGE NO.: A-?%
1
-
,
.
=
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: 4. 7. 7. /. * PAGE N0.: J/q 7-21
TS REQUIREMENT: //r e 7, n o 1 .<ruec m-r se cr o ~ p p- TA.E
Er/r r e o ra a s-s-c ci s /- s A-c N F tre e ses-rco Ar-rswdi V
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:57/-000-##I- ISSUE DATE: //70/fr REV.: O
TITLE: Fis-s 8&s+1 ca. Viru n u /~sssen y
YES 0
N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? p/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? /v/p
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should //A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
3 95 A f ri.1 c s e r to m st- w s vu e o owW.
INSPECTOR (M: /t/, 6. /V/* / .p//-v
2
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-Jf PAGE NO.: A-337
i -
,
.a
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: 'f. 7, 7. /. b PAGE N0.: 'Vv 7-2-1
TS REQUIREMENT: /e iv-siem v i c a s a_ i n, sg criou ,p gun , ,a
-
D+ m s S n- wwo +rr o e is-rr o n +x p wou
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 57#-coo-140.7 ISSUE DATE: #-/2.7/rs- - REV.: O
TITLE: Fix.s O w Aer /r' Mom % s e. /ns/scnow
YES N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? pjf4
Is installed system consistent with TS? g/4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does tne procedure walkdown indicate that it should pA
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM (OPEN) CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
MS A-m a e s w r com st 676 wet-F ow.
INSPECTOR (5): p/. E , /r4 up </
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0,
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5-35 PAGE NO.: 4.-73P
*
.
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: 4,7,7./ m PAGE NO.: 7/q 7-2.cf
TS REQUIREMENT: t's u sw x < i s a />. u ing pseriou p+ sr-
-
l-fM r 10 reizewr o+ en+ rv/s op rssi.so pear,se.g.pw.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: f TF-000-/MISSUE DATE:L/z 7,/pr REV. : O
TITLE: R ie t dwisn- /f m&r H disersi. l+1pscr>w Scsi.sp /4,.-sricro-ri.cws
"
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #/A
Is installed system consistent with'TS? g/g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should pfg
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN7 .
!
INSPECTORhid: M 8. N/ ape */
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES j@
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
' '
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5 - E PAGE NO.: 4-Di
-
.
s
o TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REV!EW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: 4. 7. 7. 2- PAGE NO.: 3/v 7-J O
TS REQUIREMENT: vuir r Finc soonr s/sngis av s v u e e r/ ~ s.
rLE Amrran e notb-o/sg Ar a m e m a ors + t u e w *~sta1
sp-wo e A re-st r 4-r- 1.cssr w ee. su c ~ * ~-r+ r
1.IC. PROCEDURE NO.:fr# -2f0-0JN ISSUE DATE: 4/2-7/rf REV.: /
TITLE: Fisea Doo s-- lL e u s a-s c w/ s cis-> >s~r visu ot- /nspecs7 w
YES NO
Is there any difference.between FSAR/SER and TS? . p/AL
Is installed system consistent with TS? pp/-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g/A-
'
. work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR ."0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
Q
.
l
l
l
INSPECT 0Rpr): A//, E. /v/u e/w- .f
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95-1 5 PAGE N0.: 4d'f 0
.I
-
,
1
r
. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEh' DATA SHEET
.
TS PARAF 4.7,7.2. o PAGE NO.: 7/v 7_.r0
TS REQUIREMENT: vutPv $/cA+4nsrv s F- rLe sin Doon- wrewnw snis.r
fsr ts.ca st&rmtuiu rassuireo r=1a ex o sr er y s w s w n s e p s w a
~
f WMC T*/JA*4- L f A 4' 7 A -T~ LdA fr DA -C-6 /M- 7/ OA V)* .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: Srp-2.fo-Wa7 ISSUE DATE: rr/f r /g-v REV.: co
TITLE: Fr os.e. Vo oir Su re,evisto" % rio ~ Tstr
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? pj(4
Is installed system consistent with TS? p///.
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v *
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /v///-
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? J/
-REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
w &cicos v u,
&4] A.-MLic w r co.~-> tw;,c
l
INSPECTOR ($): M.E.iv&4esy
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
i NO
'
YES
Were problems corrected?
l Wers any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95-15 PAGE NO.: 4--3 'I l
-
.
L J
] ,
.. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: '-/. 7. 7, 2, b PAGE NO.: 7/w y- 70
TS REQUIREMENT: TL +r- snu+ u s ucco - c.e sr s o c rits ooon is
c u ps so s r- t or r- nect ssi -7 onyr
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 5rp-a00 .7/o/ ISSUE DATE: /o/v/r</ REV.: O
TITLE: L occ 6o C Lo560 FM Doon- fP.rn /op CJf6c K-
YES M
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Affe-
Is installed system consistent with TS? pfA
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 4/ .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /vA
werk as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN hSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (R): A#, 8. M m h
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ff-35 PAGE NO.: k-31 ek
-
.
s. A
.- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: t/. 7. 7, 2. < - PAGE NO.: 3'/q 7-7o
TS REQUIREMENT: 7Lsr osors wirn kro-1srie nou-osse sa utsas ugaw,,,,
w pxss sp ose mu e. ne~s ni ussr ones sn_ u L,m no ss u s ,a. ,, n
s w .n n se rscr xr Les-rr ome re,1 ' /S men nu
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:ffr-ooo- 74#~ ISSUE DATE: /ofr-/r-</ REV.: o
TITLE: FpAi Doos.- /Lete+rc r/eca-s. m s, , i'u ne.rjoa a. 73 err-
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? //,4-
V
Is installed system consistent with TS? p/4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /v/A-
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [
REMARKS: /s.u /a F p.> it- fr/-sso - rsor ie p a-s ~.re s n
7L6 tricx s r- /s cc 7 - s- ? oe frP -o oo - r/D J s. m ,e
a iris a s- p- w rLc e on ra e. u so to / y fA-r. 79) or
fif - sor - 7 x o f*
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
699 A V /cic. & n r t o n / L-c rs wA <-n oo n is hYou se-1-
/s-cr osr cu/:*u v ef enn.ns-.a co coe y ms.nas e. .
M]
INSPECTOR (M: /t/ 6 d ie f # /
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
""
INSPECTOR (S):
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS-JI PAGE N0.: 4-30
*
.
L
=c .- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: 4t,7.7.2.,/ PAGE N0.: J/' <,t 7 .7 0
TS REQUIREMENT: TLs r n sci + u&t ocxe o r>xe ooo s- wi rn-ou r
EL L L 7tL1 C# L. b4 /2 A-Vif /d M /f r 4. O f f O M ifMr $4-C E
l' Err i t/ k o se x s
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:y7p_oop-osor ISSUE DATE: {/2-v/p v REV.: o
TITLE: De-f c y a/4+e-n + e L a c-5
'
YES N_0
LIs there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
/v 4-
Is installed system consistent with TS7 F/4
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or v'
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v' # .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should gg
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /#
REMARKS: $ TL E cnors /~ Doss ProccownC n 6r en- m enos
yox st-6 f SA- ro 7At r. ass e w Toes. D se. > re,*r .
.
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
-) 00 /,1-f'/ L / c J H V Ofb'Sl-0/f l'd PC60*f /2-S &M* A rf. sw*
6 ;c /Srivs h t-oefD u & & TL/ K4Ad//f-M Tkn J*f'S c . / rrg.ff,
l2 6 -6 V>L s s #lrf fJY -OO0~O00/ 7p /kr+t st-S sr" 906< cp VSt. WA W
' " *
IN5PECTORW): it/,f~ M/.ur s'sh/ /I ' # #' ~ "
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S): * '
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pf-75 PAGE NO.: F3Yv
-
,
.
&_- A
;,. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: % 7. 7 PAGE NO.: 3/4 7-70
TS REQUIREMENT: 7~k E re n re x s-ruite su E+ci+ o f- rre uens
- rawy iv rnnce 3.72-I rne ire De rsizmine o rs ers wisww
1VT Lt Msr A-- T~ > A A-f r #MCG /6/2- 12- h o st 1 0-5
LIC. PROCEDURE NO. : f171-000-000/ ISSUE DATE: P/2-y/ry REV.: O
TITLE: I?s i u v $/gwr>&-c LOS f
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? r/#
Is installed system consistent with TS? Afg
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or u-
editorial)?
Does ' procedure carry out TS requirement? V# '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should p/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS:
Y7LA tits c e o a. e vo s s nor ornrose v rA 6 rsteir/c
art sis .s r-o r re m Pes-s-r a e a ons rv ss-s~s- u ess emso
1W TA-d LE 7, ? Y - ) ,
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7
#fft s c/k1~ /-6 -E vnt n +rs TLS E vrEA 'r o f YEReties5D
'
30l pip- re- ro ws n a e n t t- e o e s t-t w wir+ csc,H
r / ) L / f-s c- TEc-H. fn c . / r*C H .
INSPECTOR (%): Ivl, E . stda x/M
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
_N_0,
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
. STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ IS - R PAGE NO.: A- 3 yJ
F
L J
l
: , ".
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: 'f. 7. Y. OL PAGE NO.: 7/</ 7-33
TS REQUIREMENT: A- r t s u y- n e s. pe g 7 p,o.y f gv cyci, ,g
MA-en rarsiwr tr y/Ars ut vn 7wau iz r- u n si n a
t* 9M /?L C 7~6 C VC W GF F vt L L 9'A.b k'C L.
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: Jrp-f49-o/0/ ISSUE DATE: <,/24/f-e/ REV.: O
TITLE: Metw % isinE G vi# 4c) SYS vuve cye t e. Tgg-r
YES NO
Is there any di nce between FSAR/SER and TS? gfd-
Is installed syste... consistent with TS7 p/p
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?>
Does procedure carry out _TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should v/g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V'
Rn v. / w i r i+ w+utco m i om - nrs ,, in
REMARKS:
o A-s+ 7.
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
h
.
INSPECTOR (*):
/V/.6 , M fe./w '/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N0_
W re problems corrected?
i
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
' '
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ P.f-7f PAGE NO.: 4-3 '1 (.
I
'
e
"- J
~-
_.w TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: MZ9.b,/ PAGE NO.: 3[c/ 2 -fJ
TS REQUIREMENT: Ps np s nm Sysr6M F or ~ crw~n re r r adi cs+
t ec. c. u o s s r m as u nre o sa vs -r s n e scrunra~ +~o a n i n i a c.
7~~L . 21 T~ &&& A 0170M # T7 C V&L VS- r E1 r0 1 T*$ /*Mt/tdCf~ l05/ 7/O 4.
AC 764 A e
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:fr/ 2
-fv1-e%0/ ISSUE DATE: 2.//g/gr REV.: /g
TITLE: iv/.+,iv Taasi&E dvins fys & ~cr,ows-t- Terr
YES NO
Is there any' difference between FSAR/SER and TS? r//J-
Is installed system consistent with TS? e/4-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should fv/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
30 L. #//t-i t n~r eom ets; e ass.uic o o ww
INSPECTOR (%: M 8. # Lre///V
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0_
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Tf .7J PAGE N0.: M3 47
*
<
L -
,,t TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
..,
TS PARA: Y, Z e 4. 2 PAGE NO.: % 7-13
TS REQUIREMENT: Pcmonnarws- tw 7%uu U W+r Twrse
/L'Hws& lbr a 66r rA 6 rnrs o u n v u m e n r3
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:57/_fwe 4/#/ ISSUE DATE: Cur /uw)aREV.: P ,c ,s- p r e u p
TITLE:
'
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? f9
Is installed system consistent with TS? f/
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)? k
[/
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? f, /
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should / '
/
work as written? /
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? b/
j
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM
h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
,
SQ$ l$-//LtLod H V /S $H E //-aC BGHAfE sM O cpMy*L fr p W4-L /4 00 WW
INSPECTORCT4: d . E . W % ,c u y'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PI -31 PAGE NO.: k'J W
-
.
" .
, .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
, , ,
*
y . 7 lo *
TS_ PARA: Tj,y#fi.yc.- PAGE NO.: 3/4 7 -3'/
TS REQUIREMENT: rL a r rir.n r.us.s e gernsmen op ggguiggs
-
crn u c. ru st ex-s u as DExowe rn ren ro s a- wirsiu
*f~h G /AL.OJCTGO f 6 TYL 4M 4A *r r/jJ-LM 4.f
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:f771-70'/-7/#o ISSUE DATE: 2/r-/r f REV.: o
TITLE: TTit a c rM x /J- L- f6 rrt. 6x /+7' s h nirpie.i ~s:- f>se s cu -y
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed' system consistent with TS? r/#
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? V
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
,_
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
REMARKS: - /VpuE -
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
e
36y A f r u ci> ~ r com m rrc wn-c x. o ow-W .
INSPECTORCK): F /, 6 N 4 ,<. p g v
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
8 Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM ,
OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95 -35 PAGE NO.: M3 V9
*
., .
w- .a
y -
.
4
* TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/4.B././ PAGE NO.: s// t-3
TS REQUIRENENT: 'A 2. I. I. I a , openArtittiv 01- ne t< usocecu ocur
esaca,v nertseca offsute ren a s n,ssr oa sIcruost e nab sesare ic
Cy s TE H OCTERHrAIFD AT LC A s V o AJc E PGA '7 DA y.s
bis Rt GUTEDA) '
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: #0oo-ofo / ISSUE DATE: /2/zo /sp REV.: 0
TITLE: Der /do Op e< aMo',, Zoes
~s -
v r
YES NO,
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? g -
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? [ .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should 3// e4
,
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? M/A
REMARKS: W Pr o a b
,
ctnn w ul /2,
se
dea mo# hu o_
ud,m
,
/+, uA i ck na TS T+ s ti o I p uen fel .
/ 4
.
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
7Of Leer a tt & + rAlt tw odmab arenditu h J %d r2,
MC c h cul 0 v' eel <, +ls ~
W/
INSPECTOR (S): C.C.#drsuck
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 85-35 PAGE NO.: A ' 350
e
4
' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: .#v , y, /. / j PAGE NO.: S/4 #-J
.TS REQUIREMENT: 4 8. /, /..#/.6 o# casa /ur,v 0F EAcn 'whootoptar-
6ewr BE7tuGCA) 0FFStrG TnANSMr$ G o d A)&Yta dtt k' A A) D o d_G 7 E /E
AT LGAST~ CDCE PGA 12 HourH S OW2 MC;
' 9t sTt2t 6uTad CVS-rea D E H O U.S TAATG D
#
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: "[o2-osol ISSUE DATE: # o/2s-/ g 4 REV.: o
TITLE: nMalb AC S ow en 'Tew14 T~ed '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
'Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: #d4 &
.
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
'
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
INSPECTOR (S): C C,6, Luck
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES t(0
Were problems corrected?
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5 .33 PAGE NO.: 4-35/
L_ _ - _ _- -. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _
r-
-
1
,
*
,
,
*
; i
-
l
(* TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET l
l
TS PARA: Sh. f, /. / PAGE NO.: 3/V J-3 f
TS REQUIREMENT: y 2. t. /. 2 a EAen of peau on s b paeset GEarnA ragr
DEM0^)STAATEh 6ff/2AdL E w o Tll FREdUCNCY Srce/FI& b ig TAGLE
M L /. /. 2 - f car A STA GG&eCh TGS7 /TASI S AV E~ 9 /TEMS]
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: #'N<iv2oI* ISSUE DATE: 12 /s/fd REV.: o
TITLE: Gold seasdor- Os i Opeu.6Mh, Ted
.# og o a - P N d, f 2h/ry /* YES NO
O201 -D'Y *Z 9Y I ' ~
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER an
De
S? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? s/
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or / l
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? ad 3 p<oced. /
REMARKS: 'T)v 6%- oMLem su hl da Ao o b s n u e d u u.d :
cO sie-309-ozo z - LAfecc Pa<pr M.h
, ( 47 P - 7 0'i - o r o l d o 2 o z ,
& * TC r estw w ren <;
@ * O dul G exuder Lc?A A<. A cS 35Tv V W w c 0 anc c 7-
STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
SO $ ms. mmd co wo & % prew A& ,& Lice <seg kaf resolut
I
y _.+ed sgy. lg rott5rtatootF _l);+ G} Lhegt<e suos4 nWrealt "Lkitns "
3o1 ( V U e asee m es f m *Iut 4pe..e.,+ n%/ poaeke unPtid
INSPECTOR (S): C,C, /4r 4 ved
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES f!0
Were problems corrected? .
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 1 T- 35 PAGE N0.: Ar -M ik
-. - _ - . . - _ _ _ _ .- -
,
.
- _. -
A
'
.
.
,
.
<-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3/4/ . 2, /. / PAGE No.: 3/V cP-3
et. g, t. t. 2 . cs
( &caad)
G). red E'yu p m eu.+ vd yecay4 Mt1 -do/C
L m@ detJ
P61 Ate.u.a beedua
90e 'Hu /E <f deng
(D* ('mdn k 5.S* .sf su f A a fI m
es44 sfart d~eu w j eu rs w e ou s a a , z/v e .1
eaad eo,As $ con ,ect
q) . step '7, + shoJA speEgy
sea eeu;,as iear s rena <<& ca s i c.;'
i
cha.r+ Ire cord e-
(A . Ts 4.e.<.t.z.a.<+ so <ai 4. wou +t, dad
~
k asAf . W Pro ca.Juu. sp.op ' 4 e woug
Wee 9.lo ) +, eu
<% am.A OG
@. %y ' y.7 9
Len A er L /, a tVE. >' . No'a -f's e a 4e v.e 4 l1 j
4//oweA ? ,
an acoi
CS . Pco enJua sw 7,7./+ Jun
2 aro i oseh r!%
pnuaa. Jakt -h 6e Wu'
a ca<w'alis w lK das6 . A /So
rs v. r. t. f 2 . a . 7 r#&(,wtemeed a&
t am n kr4<., c2 psy,
CO . Pracs du a sin v.s 2 i
-
.
e rs'f en t et) daea n .A
r
s td e < ah e'. 4k LR
+ < w o - e n ,, shoJA dad sosrA m level
Tks T S , h / / , a
, '
tn ni d2y +% k .
' n .o -1
specure alm 9 -% s - T+ sh o ald to e .
'9, 7 2 of tha ro cedtea,rek.no
(>de'$Pfysevte *puuk p.$.+ta
G . s5ep
l3 c w 8 Y -(tt c$o v. $ (re
.
, , e i ,
i
yn W ) OO rCh ld.
f Ye U 4 0ch I V1
% pro en dua , vt a nrap4 /'tdle c: pro v,2ref
)
aA +k.t. l o e n)' D G ha tA$a. '[0 r fia ofdta.$dv'
fn w,
. frocedua s f y 7, 9,C) doe + nd s+ rte whic h
_
& droEd enunfor N e wp.'s rn at$ b ecca sittbr ltr a*A
(pr m LcJ.ty -s s% Ia sJ e
a prapr oa caetdewn)
PAGE NO.: A -3f 3
INSPECTION REPORT 50-457/ PS -3f _
<
!
.
.
'
(#
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3/y'. 6, /. I PAGE NO.: 3/9' f- 3
,
if, r /. / . 9. a.
! (ce4cw kO) umd
uA Og T d Leveda. Cw
.
g, Fd Oil c
g_ gaf on deir
Sier y(evel gap showdl (24 correAded w'n
utd c3JJ~ ' . exc k + A , sj>e g ,c' J s, L 4Q
s , - w h t o p A A d .l 4 %, pq
s.te d a J sl o g eM & ru d <3 -t a n t< .r ,
h '
MANy " f ATER S "
,' (3
,) ,STP -309-ca.ox
LAren.s
(p, r. s . < p a= - d w
'
por ecomba
,;,J < cki eu +kd e ec s d J a .e
fp*facaJ& logie
s.t t
doe.s nb4 meet FsM d&4th of FsM
ue 4 'm 1+.a.:2.t 36 .paup y h s.J ,
s' Domcrwatreh
% el +1a ero shilily of +ia d w.af
A ho A w Ml'<h W L
yautso <4-. 40 s<.y
r <>~ A + w a ~ + m, ,ua./ h mo a<c
e
~
no o/e 'Asc aa', ~
sw4% + yed 9 . " 's e,
ece m -A e ,aA6 n wer Q
shedd la
f /acam.scA -A> #$ Hi'Cr bua f,a LCdA
.
'
u via a cat- i toe Ma oent wL4
45 y M 1 t E L Y ess'f4
fA e H t'C ' CY" A*r' 41dd-
eHM sms. - og c o [ r e_ d d a.a f
@. STE/' "I3 E h + f ro ce_ eb.t.d.
,ul r ew~ p /taocccu.
\ Q). S4be.c 4u h 9 5u ,44p <Iac
s .tK(c3 s)(k
.226oo on/mA er0ca w/a dum
<'
/
$s &.1c d 0- 0)c-c u &M
6 O A f w d e- f ent o as
dcet v A cumu % east Hut T.s. re w h a at:
Tk1 duCu j S L ub.yem3 A PA cM "f& S
Mm 7 r . aducadh,J .stada,, & a m A
PAGE NO.: h 3fy
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45t/ IS-E
,
2
- -
..
,
-s
s'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3/4/ P /. / PAGE N0.: 3/(/ F-J
' % g . /. / 2 . a_
J} (ec,d 12 i ,
*< d"*/ a d to 4 N
& d Wu ,W
J Ha cauQ de<< & a/& h %mgro A d +/u T3
cak
pW j f ag 3/4'P~ 3
__
d4 uu4 adtealz4 O <t w /m A ,oehm '
ec-ed s.4ba" %%
pud.nd adC, se y,;d ad Isad w,.<actt- k .2 goo gwz.ky +csy
it
q
~
wlK d 6 o umA .
_
fcon diw S+ep 9,4,i & %<t-1 (oad aaa be
W* 2s o o ya j hors Aos <t k 2460 r e
yo k) above
-
'3- n t<'
d penvw-44s6do Af* G wh'
&* OwAao OAe saos /C & f4 mere /m
L ts.t /. 2 ffe
s/
vcu
Lderest/Ar
rs Anus fy' &cy be
d as s Hz
'
. Foved er fre uh e4 c e 2eaf w'A
ADM oo / f
A
9
PAGE N0.: 4-lif
INSPECTION REPORT 50-457/ 8f-3J
_ _. _ _ _ _ - -
,
i
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/4. 3, /. / PAGE N0.: 3/y p </
'
TS REQUIREMENT: % 2. /. / 2. 4 thd, e r f Me Ar+<a <J s&tifar-<rak Adc
v i e -
h h uge> d O CPE/?A dLC *
<!$ )4d c>rss M 2Y pAl'tcas /% v.
Vf dgs<b kr~
vy v
delt'a sska a sud M )4/ fdb A.4e hm eheafafa<s ,-ru- f
<ya oser
,
,
LIC. P"ROCEDURE N0.: 5Tp. A//A. ISSUE DATE: _ REI.: e
'
TITLE: - .
'
YES _NO_
. Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g//f
Is installed system consistent with TS? M/A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
-
/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? g/4
#/A
~
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should ,
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? g/A
'
REMARKS:n '. w . rnp-~ m xE
4
ce #
li uwus d'cD n o'/ Aave n ,Ms escdaa /o entsaltsattrJ t/ad
YS ArouNwa f
i .
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
]IO Le um mua' , m nr$6 Artu& .
, s 6, e
~'
_ .. n- _ 12 -
a
INSPECTOR (S): C.C, /-/= , $oclc
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8 5 -35 PAGE N0.: A--3fh
_
i
* TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: S/4, F. /. / PAGE N0.: S/</ J-v
TS REQUIREMENT: 4.)? /. /. 2 . d . &n & tAs ron< d ArEJ et<timFes.e Aff
'
de e&naar a'ra29) f
em44 : a1 A.uf eneo m st sa%s
.
' / aed aJ-(A e<1& swicfiA ef 14
t/ /
c4eli/ ('?.t Am ) du cAfekte -for aud Nmsrcuci seemi.faZ/ cahrv /w., f4
.
vsrs s v v J /a s,k'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: so?-o2or ISSUE DATE: 4- u - e r REV.: o
TITLE: De, m,J olv D% h4 (JcJL accedd.h Cluck
u
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 N/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? g/A
Are there any problems with the TS_(factual or s
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should N/,4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? v
rs
REMARKS:(o) rnis z upabme,J & s4., A/udsd sa ,ed af s rp -so s -c a o t
fev o .t2~2-24 . hm' 7. 9. I -+ 7. 9. 5 hr 0<'v / c{sN/ u+t . (atlWes f., pra 2 (cz oz.))
' ' t V
hre cfdwa 0.205 CcW44 W1 7~$ i m )n/ et// 3 /d4t/+ * So r A uf 8
ff
'
th./sk ; u.)Yeh ort! <2 sb ett AM1 cut Ltd.l ? skst foe /
('L) Pr a coi
f
u s 02cf ste# ft stasn A a f. i. /. Er b .ws**- <f. (* /. / . 2 . d
l
STATUS OF ITEM hl 6) , N CLOSED
'
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
'
pj t idE.vss t t-r u s r (i) e/r/ermuks at,ic4 ,orcevAne e'c f ej/N.u) a b irces4<,</
3gp cud (23 en/uel p<cerdue o20c u & A d A ve
Me - ven~ A hu<w aAck emle feef
INSPECTOR (S): C, C, MG r l uc4
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPELTION REPORT 50-458/ 95 -3.5 PAGE NO.: A--35 7
.
'
TECHN! CAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: S/y, P. /. / PAGE N0.: J/f # </
TS REQUIREMENT: %2././.2.d Bej, Va w m u /
Ne/ S ta ry e nere k o4aff
/e drwrufrs&J eM-in46 ' of fesd suce +un .2/ cla >a &, Arweenu$ amm'aDJ
' s a J
aab, ,1,n. Mt LA sto ra avr "
famk &)'.
LIC.PR[CEDUREN0.: #5['/-7.3/3 ISSUE DATE: x-as- sr REV.: o
TITLE: efee.u,,,a &&/ van, A' c .,cw/ Jre,., M a / 4(erase 72 /a
u
/
YES tj@
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? N/
Is installed system consistent with TS? / .
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? ,/
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /t//A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? t/
REMARKS: Pro c,<twse v. chumeau -- r. s . r ,<4 .a u.t ( 4.3. s. i. 2. c
1Adea) eL 4. g l l . :2 . A )
: : m 4,Y 6 1 shoA soedQ wGA peo4ec+k +ag um'y is deu a A .x,'e, ,
akd veAr ?
STATUS OF ITEM @ .
~) CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
Jg) vi ~ . - 1 Le a~ai she d redit flu o co es b w
ott c shode veAfs ,vJ
-t C ,
INSPECTOR (S): C:C,Msr6 u k
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES _N0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ $5 .95 PAGE NO.: A-359
L.
'
,# s. ,
.
' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/9. 8. /./ PAGE N0.: S/vg-V
TS REQUIREMENT: 4 8. I. / . 2 . e . %L 4 % cecAuj dbut araa,Jocn Att
i
I See Con nua % skrE )
k ik.oufre. tea c.oesedh : .
a
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: CSF- 0831 ISSUE DATE: ;2 - / 4 - 25 REV.: o
TITLE: set th4 ,n uje
&ck ej .
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? A//A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g /A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? g/A
REMARKS: %4 Pro a dus co n 4 atne & OttoE 3 e rro %
'
c o mn o n to
paus t ,2 . 3 . E' 4 A abo 4 sod I
W T.C. r ecm G uf Edb,/ 4. E". * . t . 2 . c nl% A A e orce d 4.W. tat.1 6
u
"
ievet 0" r r. L * .:L m e h ov w.I ;
c tta p <c a d u r e ',r a
CO..messirl/soo
e . 2 m9 _
d / & aci .'n lev el 2 Mock)
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
711
. @Ls uwe & reAt are c14ea oe Ts '
ukak ev es a wer
3 13 Q1 Licengej mus+s u
correl+ pmedm
INSPECTOR (S): C. C, (0 6pc k
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 3
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS .tr PAGE NO.: A-3f1
,
t
L
.. .
t
t
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
REG'tAEA)T
TS y 3/4 P'. / . l . 2. 6 PAGE NO.: 3/'/ 3-V
,
'TITLt; e
ch p_1%, % Aka c1 +1oc D a,a.)
csp - o o 3I
s n :L- t 6 - B f
_
(%a e, (Lc v o
2 fen
allaeimod i Pn ( 9ala' W J 6'A Reeradt
,)
L Cme O skaj F a col 31ocay TM t A
73 % ge-mcy
~
. m3 c., D O M 03 %ay T4 1e
.
'p) q- % AyQ Dad Fud 6M Sfcray Ta*L ic
_
m_m % ,_ g _ _. g ,
',,., , _
,, , ,
. x_ .u 1
.
4-# wr , e ,,,. 3 .,z
.
-
2- --- .m. .- up
T j R e g o; r e n e ,+ .*
e. At least once per 31 days and from new fuel oil prior to addition to
the storage tanks, by verifying that a sample obtained in accordance
with ASTM-0270-1975, (reapproved 1980) has a water and sediment
content of less than or equal to .05 volume percent and a kinematic
viscosity @ 40*C of greater than or equal to 1.9 but less than or
equal to 4.1 when tested in accordance with ASTM-0975-77, and an
impurity level of less than 2 mg. of insolubles per 100 ml. when
tested in accordance with ASTM-D2274-70, except that the test of new
fuel for impurity level shall be performed within 7 days after
addition of the new fuel to the storage tank.
.
l
INSPECTION REPORT 50-456/ @S-3f PAGE N0.: 4-36o
o
o
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/V f, /, / PAGE NO.: 3/4 P-y
TS REQUIREMENT:
Af.f.1.1. 2, f
$twd' d w ,J
i
s/+ ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g/A
Is installed system consistent with TS? pp
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or i/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? au
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should .g/s
i
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? g/g
REMARKS: Freeum he p et./or m etu s a9 aff lfisu fns
J '
V /
trmbs YN .'4 /6b h Gl Id f5 /da d P' . TI Ffet <l4 2 menfk
Ai%dd entid /f m m the
.
STATUS OF ITEM [EFM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
3/k . A $C; m sf corrsc+ XE. -
INSPECTOR (S): C.C Marhuck
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S): ,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8 5 - 35 PAGE N0.: k-R /
/
.
. ,.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/y.8././ PAGE N0.: J/9' P-V
TS REQUIREMENT: ff. 8. /. /. 2. f. / Pael, A 9)(o cleve
i Acute
/
cdsEl#euw.1A
V
AN Ae beenda d/ ofrM&c : mA& ores ,,oes /8 men +Ls , Am,) 14aNo
bv: (n e con % dions.eeH s
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: str hoi-746 ISSUE DATE: 7-as-JPV REY.: Md
TITLE: B M / Cene d or 1 8 f4 ~ A ' A > ///
sTP-309 - 7(,IY pc, gedi$ Ob i / 2. la-o a-z71S 'l- YES tJO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? N'/A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? A//A
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? g/h
76t</
REMARKS: /r) Pro u h u ar deo u te_ TS 4 2.t.f. 2, e , a rdfral ef 4. e .t.s. 2. f I
(d P.-oa ktI(Teo4ainsm y " (icaers T" ; mostly repcI ve re ren u .C
n c o u d w ,_ . u,d M 4 k out au efical 4k4 T,s. de+ cuanoi & dow ,
[ Tkr 1m> en a.a6 y3 6- s'reu 4 at V 4 /4 adr]
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
Jl? Lsawr m1A (d corced o ra codua s a.d (s-) cicar "ltde r's '
mt ve % tkh c..) weQk o n,uka s L.a su f4'.c & J r.,
*
a ut c.
-
)ly
no N'??1 nee 5 m m a lnie-a- c i alit he x, f.3,. a./ s /rw & f., 4,,
' ' ' '
/w,, ad,w,,
'
INSPECTOR (S)$"C.C. ha rkk
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES tj0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
l
1
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/ Pf-31 PAGE N0.: A-3 c 1
)
i
!
.. .
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3/4 . f. /, i PAGE NO.: 2/4 g-y
4 4. 5 I. I . 2. . f . I
- .
' 1. Subjecting the diesel to an inspection in accordance with
procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's
recommendations for this class of standby service. .
.
I
l
.
i
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45F/ XJ-35 PAGE NO.: A-J G )
,
!
!
L
- -
_ . - _ - - - - - - _ - - _ - _ - -
7
1
,- .
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/V,8././ PAGE NO.: #9 #-V .
TS REQUIREMENT: 9'. 8. /. f. 2 . f. .e L4 g +O a&ve reyAQ </Af vvom A,i.e
A d/(4 <&w m .ftc&J OPEQAeLE : M s%d erneo p r/2 >no, % , w haa) 4 a /dn.3
^ hv : (m anacAe/ vaa )
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: SreoE59-Ato/ ISSUE DATE: REV.:
& 0:v 3 Los> c f a Kid < %er/sccs detn%a tc<+- Lev o ufn/gy
*
TITLE: '
srf- 209 - os o 2 ygg -
y9
s,7P e 109 - 0 4 0 "1 -(
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 3 y
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should ,v'/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: @ ProceLeh o c o t <t J oc o e. % Ouv. s.on s InA2 kas not
wen iss e d ye t.
% + 4s ea P-e uha &G03: _ ,-- .x y - - u . , -t_ ~~/
D * L3 renc TS nuauc,J
D Sf er$ 9.1, I, $ , g jag (ta y eep,% '
pum), fen;tm "
h <&e$ u / -73
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
):9
*
m L?cenWe rhust- Itsut 4yproveA) did ked Jewei, pyo udvre.c u,
'
)
ho O L4b.s%=whc&rged yvocede% _,,eL, ,
3 >I D liceme m.& rabve iteA sr effrm4Wre e conftM
INSPECTOR (S): C,Ce #8r b k
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES t@
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
_
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A-- 3 t,8/
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ Ff-U
,
j
., o
.
-.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: $N , f, /, l PAGE NO.: 3/(/ P- /
geyse,,,,,+ y,e,u.z.f,r_.
- 2. Verifying the diesel generator capability to reject a load of
! greater than or equal to 917.5 kw for diesel generator 1A, greater
'
than or equal to 509.2 kw for diesel generator 18, and greater than
j or equal to 1995 kw for diesel generator 1C while maintaining vol-
.
'
tage at 4160 1 420 volts and frequency at 60 1 3 Hz while maintain-
ing engine speed > 75% of the difference between nominal speed and
J ,
the overspeed trip setpoint or 15% above nominal, whichever is less.
th MVN.f^, {0pvd N w k
h, 4%paq AEupis gw dunA yssJae
4 ecoas~
nyu a. sost.z3
T3 sura 66* 3 HE .
/
l
INSPECTION REPORT 50-44 / t r-Jf PAGE NO.: h-I65
l
. _ -
*
.
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3//.P././ PAGE NO.: 3h 8-r
TS REQUIREMENT: 4 2 . /. / . 2 . 4'. 3 (%4 y b a/w nty 'd ded/ns,rerarp,.a. v
Ad/ 6e 4medrado/ et'rnthE : A + /ea d r>res -dn /P mn , , cdeml
' " & &focm
h, s (See aHache'd )
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ISSUE DATE: REV.:
'
TITLE: ( m a#ac4 d ) '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? p' /A
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? g/A-
REMARKS: le) ad 2 p r o cah . o rebewo ormo TE /e < <l',-
-
o u
(1) Tc 4cd doNu,Nfr.en nc+ follo w A h,
3 D cc ew knit [ oGincorrecls
(s) For (%aha ST P- 309 - d C 6 6 , ons edim C //
AdtckAea n orahle m rl% tiu E es u l dia detf <lSr.D
.
'
t
Lcci c _
STATUSOFIYEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS"..WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
by '- 0 Lt cluu S/rev A / szecJ h AnttvikiUL h &
'
6 ef T*.CQ)LRaert
3H vteff_covrte.$ 04 Lon ko'ny . &h* c.S n/ctb/neutre&c
M Louk wsf 4+ cw$$6s/ <t
#
'
n unw,, CUttke h
' '
^
un ..
INSPECTOR (S): C.c,harluck
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g ,
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ff-If PAGE NO.: h -J (, t
)
_ . - - - - - . _ - . - - - _ - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ . _ _ _ - - _- - - - _ - - - - - - _ - _ _ - - - - - _ _ _ - - - - - _ - _ - - _ _ - - _ - - - - _ - - _ _ - _ - _ - - _ - - - . _
-
.
.
.
TECHNILAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3 /Y 1 .1.l PAGE NO.: _J/v /-5
frveed4Nes
srf- 2 08 - oc o + o~t ) (fler o /:-o-rf
OsM Gu ede r- M Ho "r-
R u n Te<xy p_,,,
srf - 3 0 ') - o t o S* ' p sv z.
ST P - 3 0*T - 0 6 0 C Dsv 3 fevDlg-27-gr
R eq vtre,sg j l .
-
3. Verifying the diesel generator capability to reject a lead 6f
3130 kw for diesel generators 1A and 18 and 2600 kw for diesel
generator C without tripping. The generator voltage shall not
,
-
exceed 4784 volts for diesel generators IA and 1B or 5824 volts
for diesel generator 1C during and following th_e . load rejection. ,
.
4
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4SF/ W-3 f PAGE NO.: 4-) O-
_
. .
.. .
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATt SHEET
TS PARA: S/#. 8. /. / PAGE NO.: J/y 8-5
TS REQUIREMENT: 4. 8 . / . l . 2 f. 4 SA gr .m st a re,.,m d ) on a a4 ag a<e demo, -
dra&J cvsenke i M AsJ nu ,A /r w W , d o a ya da M w ., 9:
(.au az%eb/ ymy )
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ISSUE DATE: REV.:
TITLE: fnu et/aehd m i)
' # '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
#
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / w/ fv/,4
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? v (04t7)
REMARKS: P, e e,,/ua 06 t / (Div.3) - 61 (J r m rs rouwU md 4vuuA '
fr i HPc3 (ns GUdow loc. A Ya (n$ nena Y6A. I r/rnN'$
a ~; ~ ., , .: & ,e 6 si,,1:aj s.,,w
A7il '7.Y, ~ ese be e n d u n d a < / s u'. Awl/.
/ t) Pr,co Auo<_ & c Os v. t ~ d 0,0, 2. n d U<$) $7
'
#
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
*
, . ' . a.s 7 j,s.
M &berswe psad .CUrrwlgrog</U R _
-
c.1 3 c 4 3 ,-
5x 49 Lttens<e mn+ biom e IttcS bus shukw lokd '
py) QLtteM<e. mesf .,rshe rppruvf waIkeg _Jewn prouAureg
,
' ' '
_ '_ ,
,
,;
INSPECTOR (S): C.c,He6pek 6'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
,N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ #F-5f PAGE NO,: A -f4F
?
u
. _ _ - _.
. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ -
.
~
. .. ..
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
.
TS PARA: 3/'M. /. I PAGE NO.: J/4 8-5~
48.ti'"*f Y
b M erref ~
us r-
Srro - 3 6 7 - oc is piv i s t-
DW L L ot durc stat 27 TEST- '" ~ Y
sTP ~ 3 0 9 ~ OEM
S Ti* Z o '} - O C O O'V 1 . AW O 3*/ ~ O r
6equirem r.,4 I
*
._ , 4. Simulating a loss of offsite power by itself, and:
f a) For divisions I and II:
1
9 Verifying deenergization of the emergency busses and
1)
load shedding from the emergency busses.
~
2) Verifying the diesel generator starts on the auto-start
signal, energizes the emergency busses with permanent 1v
connected loads within 10 seconds, energizes the auto-
~
connected shutdown loads through the sequencing logic
and operates for greater than or equal to 5 minutes
while its generator is loaded with the shutdown loads.
-
After energization, the steady state voltage and
frequency of the emergency busses shall be maintained
at 4160 1 420 volts and 60 1 3 Hz during this test.
b) For division III:
-
1) Verifying de-energiZation of the emergency bus.
2) Verifying the diesel generator starts on the auto-start
- signal, energizes the emergency bus with the permanently
connected loads within 10 seconds and operates for ,
;
greater than or equal to 5 minutes while its generator
- is loaded with the shutdown loads. After energization,
the steady state voltage and frequency of the emergency
bus shall be maintained at 4160 2 420 volts and
,_., 60 1 1.2 Hz during this test.
,
INSPECTION REPORT 50.WF/ Ff .If PAGE NO.: _ h-161
0
h__._______..________._.___._________.__________.____.____.___._________.___________________________________________________.___.__._____________________.
*
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: sh. f. /. / PAGE N0.: 1/4 P-I
TS REQUIREMENT: 9. P . /. /. 2 . f. 5 Sv4 ,f 1Ae ebe repub.4 p6# & & ge
doendr&A open M t.e, .; A+ foca-f n eo o en f E >-s , %. , clu m e shals%.m , by :
(ia ancckrA caes) , <
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: sv-2/o -odo/ ISSUE DATE: 1-2o-sr REV.: o
TITLE: ow / DJ1< / de er4h- Ted ~ot Pa a dt rs.k+i.1, Acha,as r< J
sTP -z i o - co o z. Dw n gev o 1 - u - s s- .
YES
sTe- ze o - 06 o 2 om m a~ o 2.- z ,- c r N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? ,/ ../.4 -,s /-
REMARKS: (n) att : werdu ar v ita~ r rs d. 2 1. I. 2. d. s~ hudref et
si.8. l. l. 2 f. 5 . ESA PNI
o '
Rse P.,,. & osog ALlet.?
ce w eA re' w
HQc > sd4.
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
3W Lietu sa >und &>..s b 6 dof us.< t Ahr / 4 adn +mvfra _c ,
Na e rhuck' A//n aa
INSPECTOR (S):
C,C,Hu4p'clt
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES ,NO
Were problems corrected? ,
.
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ P f 75 PAGE NO.: A-37o
_ _ - _ _ -
7
- _ . - _ - --
,.
. - *
,
.
..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 1/4 V. I, i PAGE NO.: #Y f-f
$q,3, l. f.1. f . I
Q UIttMst N E ,
S. Verifying that on an ECCS actuation test signal, without loss
of offsite power, the diesel generator starts on the auto-start
'
signal and operates on standby for greater than or equal to
5 minutes. The generator voltage and frequency shall be 4160
1 420 volts and 60 1 3 Hz within 10 seconds after the auto-start
signal; the steady state generator voltage and frequency shall
be maintained within these limits during this test.
i
_,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-453/ f5-3 f PAGE NO.: Ph/
.
,
. .
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PAGE NO.: S/e/ P-<;;
TS PARA: .f/V.f././
4. 2.1. t . z . f. c, 4%i, A s au caaa) or,x a ,j. p
TS REQUIREMENT:
k dwdrdal OPERAetc * di And we < 12 m em L darnj da/4w, G .'
(w tJJacked -paeve )
'
-
ISSUE DATE: REY.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: (m a h 6 4 on,-r )
' # ' '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? JA -
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should gat
'
work as written?
,
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? q/A-
REMARKS: Oroudas4 lor Ovi %g Dv2. i bour w ei L,e Ersu ed ,
b Oa,3 proecture is based or ?suoe4se/e/ Ts' vcvise on dra fi -
90 oroeedAs reu, eu a<ts se4 0,N emoA .
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
>>1 0)L<co m e md Umu sem Aaan 6aarden AO$ T's Ymtf, '
}}0 Q) Lhtssee o w s f r u n t. rrlodm h con % sa1% A%l T'S
iv/2 C n ud o-e'Ntw a<</ wJAdius M 4 e's>v ei dic a a .
INSPECTOR (S): C.C, H><Appsk
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PT-R PAGE NO.: h-) ? A
,
,-_ _ _ _ _ _ _
. *
,
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
REdutR C MCNT
TS -PARA: -3- V. p. /. /. 2. F. 6 PAGE NO.: 1/V B- 6
ffVLtkWei $
ST( - 70 7 - os d / OlV I 7
> M0T issue 0 yet
S7/> - 7 4 7 - 0 6 0 7_ Div 2_ j
srio -ys? -6403 O'v 1 (k- a n - 1~r - N
; hvi/cm#nt *
'
6. Simulating a loss of offsite power in conjunction with an ECCS
actuation test signal, and:
I a) For divisions I and II:
1) Verifying deenergization of the emergs'ncy busses and -
] load shedding from the emergency busses.
2) Verifying the diesel generator starts on the auto-start -
signal, energizes the emergency busses with permanently
4
connected loads within 10 seconds, energizes the auto-
connected shutdown loads through the load sequencing
logic and operates for greater than or equal to .
5 minutes while its generator is loaded with the
emergency loads. After energization, the steady state
voltage and frequency of the emergency busses shall be
maintained at 4160 1 420 volts and 60 1 3 Hz during
this test. ,,
b) For division III:
-
1) Verifying de-energization of the emergency bus
2) Verifying the diesel generator starts on the auto- -
start signal, energizes the emergency bus with its
loads and the auto-connected emergency loads within
10 seccnds and operates for greater than or equal to
5 minutes while its generator is loaded with the *
emergency loads. After energization, the steady state
voltage and frequency of the emergency bus shall be '
maintained at 4160 1 420 volts and 60 1 3 Hz during -
this test.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4Sf/ F T-M PAGE NO.: A-) H
.
_
.
6-
-
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PAGE NO.: J/V E -d;
TS PARA: $/9. B././
TS REQUIREMENT: </. 2 .1. / . 2 f. 7 Oe4 q % s/m nwnbd oce 44
de akoss&nM ePc4MLE : M /ad errce;w 18 mc>, W , af e dlca w 3 9 :
Y w a t % t' 4 / w .t y )
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: [e a at/aeX</ 'wa a }
# ' '
YES _NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? PoSs 6LE
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should M/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? 1 /
REMARKS:(dh s7 F
ro i - gio / 4, ( (
(D. % Pr e e skr.es d$$"%i as,su r
-
-
+v
,
med AM Med af
Oo os d G enendaca- ,
% TG be 0,v s m A D r u 2.
W died aff e<tgr 4e r e7u[o +km d Allerhint Ulf HCy_e??%t*AJrtfvrn'hjsbTT '
yyy @) Nutt mt corroek TJ +y g,fwn 4esH
,
& Le%'se c mv& n svo yreceJs m
yy3 @ G%u e sv& vfreef prl<tAad '
INSPECTOR (S): C G (laflvek
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ ,P3-31 PAGE NO.: 4-Dy
l
l
l
L
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
. - _ _ _ _ - _ _ .
.
- ,
-
...
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET ,
REduMcMcN r PAGE N0.: s/V #-6
TS -PARA- V. P. /, /. 2 . f'. 7
94ldit1WKH .*
9 7/'- 26 4 - 0A g / 3 on V 2,'l Ec c S f
'
MAwuAL y,9
Fv8CricML
S TP - 2 c s" - Cd o / 064 l '
re c T ~
J %
-
$ 2r n ::a :, ; , o~ >
3 f Rev
- f
'
Ur:r," m w ~ v.. = , oara J L 1,' res,; r w
u
. O a ,. t :-
imt 0,.-
-t
t
-
,s > .,
l . cbV - .,v
.
,.< , - n. -
j
- 4, 4
TS [ Ros o 3-4- A f
STP - 309 - 0610 910 1 ]
Mud he<3eucy Sid Tect
/2u, z-ze-f5-
ST P - 30'i - 06 I l Di V 2. )
E m em,* n , Cf ad Ted No : -J - & f
S TP ' 3 d '} -0 612., Dev 3 s
a
htQUIA.EMEAIT:
- 7. Verifying that all automatic diesel generator trips are automatic-
ally bypassed upon an ECCS actuation signal except:
-
a) For divisions 1 and 2, engine overspeed and generator
differential current.
*-- b) For division 3, engine overspeed and generator differential
current.
OG s iny a. ru nnihj . Th e fr e t vc(g
- -
iw40tlLcf 4o vedg -ihof W Mf <$ g,(&f my -iha s ht ,A
,
insic<td, do e.L N followdj :
4,* 6( Ir l f #db M h e Ntl4 (, w M*c k
rc C.f.4NTAd Ai AAA LA*j [R5ss mukied Ec c i etc b tM e
cM esil 4h dva9mAf ed id p4-); ct.
Jgl e Me'skt it l c
i
f
41,4 j h d\[ O (H If4l f d e Y[M '}0t4 AW 5 idC 4.Y
4, 64 cuerg cy(It!toI .C - ,
! v ca N O J 91 4I,a / /kJ m*u re4 *** * r ~ ~ ^ ~ ~
'
The ce*9 0 fr *,
I ,
uuJ fg, s/rufalou% ) so u orled f r o's s u y c. '
- ges psa,teWe .w/. /A< e*y;.a J n ~2 i % 1ry y<nei ca ,,,.o r b e ven t.,)*
is awa PAGE 50.: A 17 +f-~
thSPECTION REPORT 50-4$9/ FS-11 on rwur a oc!
$ O'. T PMC l
l .
t ,
.; *
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
, f, /, / PAGE NO.: 7/V E-(,
TS PARA:
y,r.t.t.z.f 7
(aL cenLA tka saw t<J be cl. .u.
rs s,hould also r epw
@ . to v eMy %d W dw & Jsderaeduc' -tv .f a. <t a byuaAtkd
didscA au s wM6 o n
p tLa Div i ud D.s 2.
- kencyt sey frur UV
sta~t
-Sme p.sg weud
h * Yrms T~.5 r elbti+, eik
J a
S'i' (# ~ 30I-06(2-
dcret w oi agge<tr to nsec t iM
@ . 'Ifu Pro c.e du <-c
threns of M rs % sks bw 11c d&D a cued.w .
%c., twtew.t afyvan4. iv y<pulu +k<4 W 2(to. het
,
44dQ
x %
cp.h ow Ecc5 aci d ten A.ufstaf % d the
n
"dowp(&4 ; trip + ca.ueA 4e vedj3 th d -t4ut O c.,
'
Jns f eof ,tL p ro c edut ee
st<uf4 mninj .
WW .$ fL4 fitt
t')A. YU $Y *fL c
m reo.e-weu.. Tken nu& te [d sk}de
ecc.s ad ' se p<.1
kg
& ls.afeR . Tu 4><p byp m a. v enLj u A' +/u
n ew utan9 <wo m tAl / a f a 9 c < O A r-
Ecc .c ae/urY'r m
a6a av aHf e
n u.lh n, 4, . Tk.e +q typyaaucc4d ccw;YacAx <a4eed
.
a
s.:t- v e-t' , h a w eves y e w-s &<< .
c,( e u
O Y ff 0 C4 kilLt. \ \ OL b h<Y hL $LCMk l't
audo sievels m b eer vndre va/fagA . 1p 5e ,
'
(p-
t ew iltA TS ShoMJ r e g {tua i cef ,
h
-1 0
vot Mu t kau sm a ., 6e a o r o 6/c'a 4 0 1 4.
h<u
Oro 2 d a's.< 9 lo c}& , (' tare s's ., , licenseeit ,, e f . OR
issa*4 a t o cF A Pcw t Jo.s9G=) regor1 en
S T/' - 2. o 4 - o 4 o e csua
5 y - 20 S'-o 6 o /
Pro cc duh he1 N &c <.E u & ),
h(.g)'q oppbeid-6 ~% paj<msh -IGn -t's ; 1
PAGE NO.: ,4 " I %
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4)?/ PP3i
-
- _ _ _ _
.
es' . 4
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: S/V 8. /. / PAGE NO.: 3/</ #- G
TS REQUIREMENT:
0. 8', J. /. 2 , l'. 8 Eu4 A %o ak o rmm0f Oc; a d og (,t*
dseu n h) 6PERA MG A $ A n d e>rce ,
E m es . , ela e du Mw , <G :
un avnu i -< )
ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
TITLE: (,uc ,tt/4 c A ,/ #n '
v)
# '
YES @
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: (t) 4.lf 3 o ee cc Aww r abu.c4 wwo ~T 5
.j\ % orecodaa%
'
do nd odit$u +o *T*$ d$uwETod
l'Tkta
'
oPG N i re H i s: * AELAThb To
T s' 4. 8 , l . ( . 7. f. 3 a./a )
.
STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
3hy J tet~u >,ue & nov1Io A r e ,.s e d< a u . /c m/f f h3
r cr
Al$e - #14 M+ Ys st/ Ath '
/rCl?'ftht.t sk
fNSPECT0f(S): C.'C, #4 rink _
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT $0-458/ 75 33 PAGE NO.: A - 371
,
c
. ., ,
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
/28WHENT' S h 7 -6,
TSPA% e t. /. /. 2.(' f PAGE NO.:
enucuvoce.
o,o r 3 <- an c 2 -2,-g r
sv- so? - oco u
gr-go9 -od or ow 2. 24 How RaaTe.sr ) be o z-t1-es~
0 2 ~27' Ef
.$ 7/ - 30 9 - 066 C, DW 3 J
k G'4t V l M M fr h T *,
8. Verifying the diesel generator operates for at least 24 hours.
The diesel generators shall be loaded to 3130 kw for diesel
generator 1A and 18 and 2600 kw for diesel generator IC. The
j
generator voltage and frequency shall be 4160 1 420 volts and
,
j
60 1 3 Hz within 10 seconds after the start signal; the steady
state generator voltage and frequency shall be maintained within
_
these limits during this test. Within 5 minutes after com- ,
pleting this 24-hour test, perform Surveillance Requirement
4.8.1.1.2.e.4.a)2) and b)2)*. .
!
'
"If Surveillance Requirements 4.8.1.1.2.e(4).a)2 and b)2) are not satisfactorily
Instead,
completed, it is not necessary to repeat the preceding 24 hour test.
* the diesel generator may be operated at 3130 kw for diesel generators 1A and
18 and 2600 kw for diesel generator 1C for one hour or until operating
temperatures have stabilized.
-.,
,
l
,
__
INSPECil0N REPORT 50 45r/ FS-39
PAGE N0,: A -JN ,
,
A__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . _ - _ - . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
,
.. ,-
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
3/9 8 4 f
'
TS PARA: S//. 8. 4 / ,
PAGE NO.:
TS REQUlREMENT: 4. 2. /. /. 2. f. 9 S& e4 +1a afiere r/eaOJ claA / ew tr.,for-x
'
A t o 6e dt+1 m / n fief ofEAAktE : t2/ /s d enct sun '
R MeniA4 , 'et%nu's '
SAid'e6w . 6<> ' (pr a dseld a cr ) '
'
ISSUEDAiE: REV.: !
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:
TITLE: //aa atitcLA m.e ) '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS? / l
'
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or 1 / .
i
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? A//,f l
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /t
work as written?
l
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? #/#
REMARKS: (d rs. REdudcttGNT G TATES $3d KN F0/2 MM LCAO fcR 06 1
A tad 6 wsrcAo sr THE l'vw e r (AP/>AMHYL Y ] 3l50 16J \
/2 \ /%n rilad c.7P-302-o602 Asa d A tNuned /n,4(A ,'y
ash
Je Div :r chb .a-er.er'or . (A fanad en suser.,s<6J rr av Y)
Y3) fratvda.r.1" b div / a+ d Div 2 >uf uhbe/#ud- '
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
$3)(,) blec.?we nu d o.she } nsuub/' prow /cere ,wjelk ,,s/ & f
1)Wn ;/<~An' ~7~r
'6'W' (Q NM. invet dem+- teeh nhal sga f6.si 1
.: .: _ .' \
n'kpk1 htuy)u %vs+. c meet yrnedare,
.
'
INSPECTOR (3 : C.C H-ar(v c lt
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED i
STATUS OF ITEM !
PEMARKS: 4
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECil0N REPORT 50-458/ PS- U PAGE NO.: h-1 # j
i
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - __ _ . _ _ _ . _ - _ __ .. . .
- _ _ _
-
si. !
'
. i
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
REG.'Mcd T" PAGE NO.: s/v P-7
T 5 M R At v s. /.r. 2 . f._ 9
*
(Ot.thMt*
SrP - 309 - o co r 3
2 7t* - 101 - cG ot a
nov 3 L.oP/Ec e.s Ae /aadrl sts~ s tr.19 9/
.
,
STP .769-0603
A rts4/C-MWY :
.
t 9. Verifying that the auto connected loads to each diesel generator
do not exceed,330 kw for diesel generator A and 8 and 2600 kw
-
for diesel generator IC.
r
s
e
,
f
I
.b .
i
i
INSPECTION REPORT 50 45)/ F f-If PAGE NO.: k-3f o_
. _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l
i
-. .
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
I
TS PARA: SN, 8, /, / PAGE NO.: J/</ 8- 7
[ TS REQUlREMENT: t/. 2. f. / . 2 f. /0 CreA et W s% n.*wevA n%. nAnHt9
<fnwa/nsk/ mAdm : At Ars,ai swe n 2 me,5A< > deni3; sAuMw <,69 :
'l at affasA/A #sa )
REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: srMo7-oao/ ISSUE DATE:
TITLE: $$$ os ti l iz , 4' 1
'
ccc.s kruess /t.or
ogc3 - At.r o at- v - St/ yES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? i/
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? #/4
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should 4/A ;
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdowni
REHARKS: hroceceG&s /), r- ()w I <tr.G Dw .2 n.,1 w-wat<< / .
0Av 1 /%sde < r il fm u A sm ,a ws,udd 7Y /zurlwi, <& f l
/sA&J A <rs n a h. "
Jo-
7'S y. Er /, / 2, l'. 9 sfl,.i- )
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
l
,
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY _WHEN?
)$$ 0i e> << a e noud t+sa..' aff runfort Wvtl'NrA A * ton art'/d$t e /
Ga)% h%l TC,
v1 9 Ltte~ut wa- cared
1
f
AM C b/6 n.3, //m nemte.r -/ '
v/wr mvrrAu
'
re
INSPECTOR (Sfi C.C{ N /4ved
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g *
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? ,
STATUS Of ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ fI 1f PAGE NO.: MJL
,
.- .
..
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: I9', 8, /, / PAGE NO.: #4/ 8 J
,
MaM-MNT L -
', 10. Verifying the diesel generator's capability to:
a) Synchronize with the offsite power source while the generator .
" is loaded with its emergency loads upon a simulated restora -
tion of offsite power,
.
-
b)
Transfer its loads to the offsite power source, and
j c) Be restored to its standby status.
- -
.-
9
>
,
/
,7N '
-
-
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4SP/ F.r-3f
PAGE NO.: h- W
.. ,.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 1/# f. /, / PAGE NO.: 3/v J - 7
Y 8, /, /. 2 . f. / / &,t; et 4, adm nsue / oca ,as; J f
TS REQUIREMENT: f '
6e kmew%Ad ew 64 : d / E v d e><er ; M s s' m>, % , da e e sda/A y Q
(w arXuAed wel #
REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE N0'.: sv-sofNU ow2
ISSUE DATE:
TITLE:
c603 top /eccs achdr A Dw3 ,tWe "*2 5 -lY YES @
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)? /
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / (DW 3 oniY ) 6KcP d4
no ted
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g /A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? / ,
REMARKS: (d Preced e 06oI ox<f d6oz W ut4% umf ,
ra\ Pcc ce h ta ne,os unw v. mLh&r;&. mot m ' rs -
A nM . no-
'
cY & b4lauer eFL Yr> h e%cm A 4 )
n ye) A, 4 8.i. /. 2 . f . 9 on / .to ;s njis,
u '
9
Arm).
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
^}40 Wrconeu ws s' c-a-can <thrvesA> wsIIUhA% e1 y c w <a .
Ni (O Uceuu uu sh e owed Vrotelare
AfA C N/trLaatt
c
'
b N&rNxJ 4' fl Lect '
pr ce r && .
INSPECTOR ($): C Ce Unr"huch
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
t
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: 4 -77 3
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 15-7f
- s
- _ _
3
- -
-
. . ;.
,
.-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
,
,
. .
-TS PARA: 3/6/,f 7 / .
PAGE NO.: 7/'Y' E - P
if. 8.(. (. Z S . 0
~
-
.
Ae99tremthat
11. Verifying e#! with the diesel generator operating in a test
mode and connected to its bus, a simulated ECCS actuation signal
overrides the test mode by (1) returning the diesel generator
-
to standby operation, and (2) automatically energizes the emer-
>
l gency loads with offsite power.
__
4
a
f
i
.
1
PAGE N0.: A ~3 P Y
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4 7 / 75- )f
_ - _- _ -_. - - .- -
i
.. s
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/r/.f./,/ PAGE N0.: s/V #- 7
TS REQUIREMENT:
% 8 4 /. :Z . f. /.;L 01e4 si & cAcre w eld /de &nsukA:/
oPMACLE &f 6aJ nu .n ? mez. ?dwwh
'
'
'
4 J dorm , /s .-
'(ax af$re/wJl ,
REV.: .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: "# 7##~fffl ISSUE DATE:
TITLE: D t t) l { Ono 2) Leu c) e d (%e, / MC S Lefa drl 7'&
YES N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? v'
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or PosslJ/y
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? d/A.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g,f%
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? A//<4
REMARKS: (d Yb pro ceder A ktc< wil v 6f /vro M u // ,
do ' 6e asbNrw .
Yi<aaa
(z) TC K, c) t_ t o %
- v
STATUS OF ITEM hPEN) CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? '
141 & Lec w e LA parerduaa.
it) G NK d41enk e corr'ehen JG$10 %
Al/2 L ANeu w
#
INSPECTOR (S): CaC /hrsued
i
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ~
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ff-Jf PAGE N0.: h - 395
_
, - , - -
. . . . . .
. . . . . ... . . . . ~ . . . - - . . ..
*
. . ,-
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 7/'/ f, / / PAGE NO.: 7/V F-7
Afg us j
. 12. Verifying that the automatic load sequence timers are OPERABLE
with the interval between each load block within 10% of its
>
design interval for diesel generators 1A and 18.
_L.
t
i
,
e
t
1
I
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4Sy/ #5-7f PAGE N0.: h-374
. - .. _. . - . - - - . - . - . - - . - - - _ . .
. _ - - - . - . _ - - . - - - - -- . . . - . .-
r-
__
. ..
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/V.E/./ PAGE NO.: 3/v # '?
TS REQUIREMENT: % 2. /. /. a . f. 13 Dst, y W d e oce ny 6< ,/e,.<mus
2LdAmu , 6s .
'
ofCRACLE ? (1} &nd ener #h Rw. dw
* v
(Mt etNacko O ;enu
.7-n- tr REV.: o
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: Sre-Jef -0407 ISSUE DATE:
TITLE: Ptv I D ta'uf Gs,a,dc + Lc.chet t o m a G{rfu T a t '
-
06 o # Div I re,s e 2-o-sr YES N0
Rev- o 2-27-3 r -/
060 Div m /
Is there any ifference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS7 /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)? 4
Does procedu/,e(carry out TS requirement? /
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #/A-
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
'
REMARKS: 6) For mal / ore erdwte# k ceah.c/ w h6 A ort-oo < >
_Q TS reJhouuA vSn
D Pro ce dwtu d o n d $ o o e a r- Ao nasa uJeat e1 ~tLe TS.
On ce a padd <.da r- \ccb ic mser4 ed wo <d(eYof t s
wade -h d d tka dolof , pro c ( s kejr W v o g 7e d a r-t
'
b o * '" *f )
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
' '
s,, .o,
3% N'ea w s 7.wd 30treb~ (rote $a T o. .
.,
m M Lras w nust erHre orueda +e care " ok n muhi, e, /
'
1% @cac .es usK cl9 rtfy N reevhere n1 '
INSPECTOR (S[: C C$ t/ de 4vc /t
4
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM .
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75 -II PAGE NO.: h-39)
__
, ..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
.
TS PARA: 3/4/. 8, /. / PAGE NO.: S/9' f '7 , 8-8 ,
M S . /. / 2 { 1 3
tGQvwC+For: -
~
,13. Verifying that the following diesel generator lockout features
prevent diesel generator starting only when required:
,
a) For Diesel Generators 1A and 18: '
1) Diesel control panel loss or control power.
2) Starting air pressure below 50 psi. -
3) Stop solenoid energized.
4) Diesel in the maintenance mode (includes barring device
engaged). -
5) Overspeed trip device actuated.
6) Generator backup protectior. tockout relay tripped.
b) For Diesel Generator IC:
i
1) Diesel generator lockout relays not reset.
,
2) Diesel engine mode switch not in "AUT0" position.
3) Diesel generator output breaker closed before start of
diesel.
4) * Diesel generator output breaker in racked-out position.
5) * Diesel generator regulator mode switch not in "AUT0"
position. . _ .
6) Insufficient starting air pressure.
7) Loss of de power to diesel generator controls. _
-ye JAM +) ud 5) de net el&r s cdb3 bloc /c dwaf
apas th e- frew eedws ce .dadeu 'e * h o w e v e +W ,
Qh dM 'f fV .I48t &E h of284
i rn
d Tiv ([ ,
ph
[AI( &W toA M )
,
nndtcak, hhy N &
,
obserre . t on
TL m O c,+ wg no+ 5ek h4
covdn ( vo e m .
Vor e > cam l e. Dw 3 d.a ,%
%e. lockord s . ,
lcckaufe na . U i 4), c~ A E) afyrvuudfy cien I,,,,'A.4 '2 p n :n y ~ '
a ed s: fad , ewe +b ust au tud w b md
'
a -
medd em YF,
i .i
cewcanwb, wa J SM , ox -f%
h) W A vacp ,
T's
as:
aw aax w 7"asWa a dawusces asaskw,k
.daqf.e<-e<, .g-t{p *
AJdeet h .ao :) . " t
/ocko Js ? ,
PAGE NO.: /4-3?P
INSPECTION REPORT 50-6 F/ 75-15
u
_
. .
,
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 1/z/, f, /, / PAGE NO.: 1/y' #- #
'
TS REQUIREMENT:
LP . f. /. 2 . q . Esd u
et n a%e vuuu,/ DGs sAtt/ x,
u i
(hturnt$rn1YM$ 6l'f10Affl E .'
fArr e NceAr,$-,wrg}
'/
2-er- f r REV.: o
LIC. PROCEDURE NO. : ST/'-307-44/'/' ISSUE DATE:
TITLE: h0isoo.a x r, nJa Dalel Ey' s io <ta, 3%Jfanem stad 72d
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? [
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or t/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? M .
REMARKS: (0 ProeeA M eod A A h
(z ") rs res tu m e.A u, c m e,
(% Pre co w &n 7 1. 2. S~ Ab dad (la Ac-cr 4 w asu m
p arama n 290 Yu Ykl< w a w'&& uM demak o
nA
'
e
N Tr.
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
yr) W lZtenee us& awImr.&'tAnna" @ Lrraset e aws+ amilpaisam "
)w @ Litea.see maf rheIvt wAm/rs mfbd
(Q LIctet mast ceAc rhea +n k t%Itme,f TSIr '
l't} INSPECTOR (S):
C.C a#w6'vek
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 35- H PAGE NO.: A -7P9
-
*
e '.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3/'/,f././ PAGE NO.: 3/e/E-X
< ,
e
. Q.qvtreme,4 % Y' l* I' 'V
g. At least once per 10 years or after any modifications which could
affect diesel generator interdependence by starting all three diesel
generators simultaneously, during shutdown, and verifying that all
three diesel generators accelerate to at least 450 rpm for diesel
generators 1A and 18 and 900 rpm for diesel generator IC in less
than or equal to 10 seconds.
fle w W tid v, r1 & +Lt vNe.d-
(LO 9a ce ek de
oj 44a rs . A pc c ca dua ac h tcher
na Jw, em aw w n Amba +4 tee
5
ogenadorA. wam ugj 31 d -f M
Cl
,
duad, _ d nu sa w 44 cc +fu am ahd
lo c 4.4 cen.d t cH# g ed , W sim d iewf %
s+a~+ s k u.A A u o.semla't h ed w ca e x
aA- ECc$acMu h,&
a c w n on W Stpof5.0disuA
AtM-
'
l'ne,4r ( Oc4 o <&r vs //af)
ttuel /n r '
/ //
_..
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4fy/ FS-3f PAGE N0.: d-310
- _ _ _ .
-- --
__ - - - . - - _ _ . - - - - - - _ - . -
_ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
r-
..
,
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
PAGE N0.: J/v #- p
TS PARA: ad/. f./. /
TS REQUIREMENT: 4. P. /. /. 2 . h 01<4 v.4 % s% runu,,' i
t! Dn adatt &
dedmE9 oremne - (w arkeb/ pr.v]
'/
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: sre-Jo?- Nff ISSUE DATE:U'd 'N REY.: $
7'## ' '# N# # # " # 'Y ##'"'i
TITLE:
7?et-io y e w a c+dly hie GenenA,- Ra/ ca! ygg -
y9
Sy d<s. Pma ' red
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? / .
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? [
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should A//A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? g/A
REMARKS: (O ST F - T #1 -7 7 o i cMi P a te u C i b M 'f, $ ,, B ,, pt,
e<cco b h A a ereo m o.A ad v a ras . 5 '<A t y $ f , L a u
'
-ltJ D hr ns *
VT 'Z. n vi-1 G J rr e Arju,i ev
daueled 84, J /'
.
y 4
s
N444 th n LA p ro j.'k ek bS w N 0 4% & no tr$uM does. H et O ct lt ,
(3) sT t'- To')- ? 747) conOuh Icdeu , AL'I h au clear <A h
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? '
.r
3Sl D b u m n u u / Jnsylinteert Iu.fer1- .,- ..
~
,__
ffL Q Licenseirktf sam <.// lovrest
A //w d whet'A&U
,
Nd'c '
'
INSPECTOR (S): C C, h,4 ued
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
_N_0
Were problems corrected? __
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F f .& PAGE NO.: A -31s
.
_-____.__-_________ ,
'
'
, . ,-
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3/V B, /, / - PAGE NO.: 1/98-8
;,w g Y.8 f I 2 h
! h. At least once per 10 years by:
1. Draining each fuel oil storage tank, removing the accumulated
,
sediment and cleaning the tank using a sodium hypochlorite or
!
equivalent sulution, and
!'
i
2. Performing a pressure test of those portions of the diesel fuel
oil system designed to Section III, subsection HD of the ASME
k
Code in accordance with ASME Code Section 11 Article IWD-5000.
<
kne%$ (b& wA0
orecedLw eamtel" be do es e .
[h 3oth or o coAote_& e cle4#ucp v
Me w v <*q3 TS .
\
TS 4 8 . (.i . 2 . k L agen c cojo ah, u,,y, 4 ,, f
(JU
llfd fCk 40/L f /A bLd W Yb thf f C) Cf
S~i P - 3 D '1 990I
.
t
P
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4ff/_ #f-2I PAGE N0.: _ F31L
.
_
._. -__ -
.
.s, te
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: 3/4, E11] g PAGE NO.: 3N B- /2
TS REQUIREMENT: D.C. rf FfTRIPAL MWEP SOURUS 1. _17 C nr BATTE'R/CS
AND CHARCERS 5 HALL EF DEMD1/GTkATED OPERABLE Et/ERY 7 DAYS OY
ORECKINC E* A CH 8ATTERY BAWX FD2 fROFE2 El.FCTRdiVTE LEVEL . FL0+r
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: 3 f ",I/,0 O' ISSUE DATE: .,'_ _y c REV.:
, e -
TITLE: Ser . ton [$ Nf7Y [ sbEEf
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? V/4
Is installed system consistent with TS? X
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or x
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? x
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should jvg
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? %
REMARKS: TJ,2 THMaar S TP's Fox CGuftAL .TUA V A l.Lfutd Of TMg'
Bnttgxics Atc Coussorero AnaavArs Auo Meer Tar Ru ousecMeurs,
De Tyr TWO! S/sc. PAnsa tan 4.9 2.1. a . STP TDS - J/D Z ls_8awa
G o vec A- Mesa A/ ware STP -203 -II02 A vo WILL He /ssy g D A.s
.E)?v O . GAcn On Tne 3 Ptocroutes // Ave 81rua tAlh LM SD Qp_w_AL
STATUS OF ITEM .h
C0R "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
Sf) ($TP ~ 303- I/OO Alstro s To 8s Marus ewen Fon Is.scoa. po nA ro ort _ uta A gave ,
e ouu wur.s. @ S 7"P- 203 - //02- Wecos To BM Re v o eu., co Fa m _ /uto n m estMa
_Of A eove Co u u wrs ADn Fogss a-rw- Luna e
INSPECTOR (S): K. 4, wago
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES tQ
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOCEO
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ H-ff PAGE N0.: _ _A. - M J_
;
,
..
. .
e
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3/ 4, 8. 2.1. g PAGE NO.: 3/4. B -/2
TS R ED 'T CDNT'D : Votrass Ano S psetrit' f, nA v o r v .
LIC PROC. No. S TP - 305 - 1100 . R2v 2. ,, is s u e DArs
T*IrL K I BArffffY \AIK & K.Lv SuR VElLLANcc Tess /~o n !
, Barrenv I EN B " 6AT 01 A
STP -305- 1101 y Rev i .Issus DArc 4/12lAS
T*/rL2 : BATTEAY WEEK L4 $UKVEtu.ANcs Test Fox
BarrexY I EN B* BAT 01 &
*S T P - 30S - / / 02, Reu O , I .s sue Onin- t/1//85
TITI.E : Barrsk kleco<Lx Sun ven u.auce Tesr Fon
Barrsar 1822.* BRTS001
*STP RENUMBERED 20 3 - l102 , RELI D.
DOCUMEUT IS IU REVIEW STATUS AUD WILL
UOT BE' ISSUED IU T/ME FOM THIS REVI EW.
[0L1710: GY T/ts Lo esntser. A is/n w o o usas Ev THee-
PEMARY S
C
o
AIRC Is Nmi- R ea viero . STP - Jos - 1100 d STP - 201- 1102
R E Q u sM.f THr FoLuwm; Cnar.r.s : Ssrarsaa 2.,0 REFERENCSS,
Aco 2. 9 M SP = 0009 3 OUAllFICAT/ou 0F Mn>Dr con nes'
PsttsoNAsEL * S Ecrt ou 5'* 2 L /MITnitou s, Aoo S.2.4
Tds Pen.wNNdL. PKM.Fa w fus tar.s Placsouar Tanu de G unursen
Pas Ravenewee Z. 9. STP - 203 - I/4Z. Neros r o M c - P t.n t r o
le Tua Swr FnAmarv A .s IIU O e' 110 /. Secr to,o 4.0 ggougggo
Ga vorucury Mawr Aun M ooca. A/vuaea Mast- Rd Suuua o fue
THERM 0MErst.
INSPECTION REPe?T 50-4fr/ F.f-Jf PAGE NO.: N-31*L.,
-
_ - _
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/V F.1.8. b PAGE NO.: 3/V P -11
TS REQUIREMENT:
OC ElecfrTral (Lee fources T,Li W da//tetes and
darten shrit 1,e demonskafed ne, Lie ear <v n 4 v s cla,o.us ) ~
or wi%k 9 davs aFkr a batihy discLarie ), ele Ito volts or
' '
-
- ISSUE DATE: REY.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: -
TITLE: See co,firi Wh% cAcci *
YES 0
N0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? N/$
Is installed system consistent with TS? K
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or M
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? K
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should $
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? X
REMARKS: "T/se. Oede STF'S for ike Darffelv SurwilI4nte o f f(e
batteries meef 1(e rerutremenh oF T S 'pareera,L 't. 7. a . I 4 ,
' '
_hs c w + For the Ra llows% d rol,less a N J Olscresa d s %
Yes 4 wrocelma r-evaene/ kre cesrAe v) edesd<1<,
~
@ Sec'% i 1 AIrss etes WT+L TS Orth 4Ne'ev lum 4 'd )
STATUS OF ITEM M CLOSED
#
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
'
3y W Li ewe nes + eesolve T r / troceluos c o,Jfre+
) Sir (i> L?uaste r d eovree t nyue*A vrtr
4
INSPECTOR (S): K. A. LO d er$
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
:
Were problems corrected?
*
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS Of ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 f-3J PAGE NO.: A--373
,.,n -
--_.,y. - ~ - - - - - - -r e
. .
.
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3/4.8.2./4 PAGE NO.: J/4 B-/3
MaVontness:
BATTfd Y OVEd ennnt.1 OF 144 Bv Venirvitas 1*unt Tur Pnd nurrras Learoa /A)
THene /.1 No V a o at t Cognossou
TAsLE 4,9. 2.1-l Mcar C Ar esoe y 8 Liuors
Ou Tsit M o unt s 04 Cove se rods . THf Cowuferton K css s reves ur Tusss
/ reus And Less 7"Hau /S0 x /0 ~' Onus. Aun Tus Aveen,s 6Leernasvn
Trussanruns is Asevg 6 0 'f*.
Px ocwous #1
S TP - 3D.T- /30D . REV I. Issus Do rg 2.h1h s*
* Q UA R TER LY BA TTERY SURLf E I L L A AICE YEST"
GTP - 30S'- l3 01. Re u D y i S3ue Dart 2 /2abr s'
* B A TTER Y /ENH*BATDiB QUARTERLY SURVEI L L A UCL TES 7~"
STP - 2 03 - 13 0 2. Rau 0. IS3ur Dnrc .3 / / h s' ,
'
* B A TTERY IE22MBATSDOI OUARTEA*LY .50RtIFI L L ANC E TES T "
A DMAfr OF REU i PQlt i3 0 2. WAS K E (// 6 W E D
REMARKS Conir'o s
88 P an ma u s a,
O V6ftVOL rn h f At WwocN Sutvasa.nued Test M us r-
T*S Recuann 144 VOLT 3. STP SSMCIPtso 150 t/en.n.
& M A su rGun ne d' PdescucL- Ween To Sc Q ue L o f ten fDL
M B/3 - 000 9 Pa tort Th Couoversus; suavGILL Auctf Tnstr.
_0 Secrtchs C.0 Aun 1. D L/ san S is.As - D ffe L Juss.
BArtsov Ranu H vnoas su c'nw oornn rinn 13 Lisrdn A2
<2% (4.S). '
Saoutn Be <I%.
$1 7. S. R. Tri s 'B a rre a r tsLL = To = CMU f y rgg.cauyge y ppy
RestsrA ure Tie s t Does Uoe toussogt rue Resosrauce
Of THE 20 ff Zuwet s I)2tn Td Con w ee r Tise T1ou H4t.ps
Dr Tha On treev Unuw.
STP 203~ 1302 * 4.3 7"urnao u arret klas A un Monet Wausse
3HoVLo Bs PAtovros a.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45f / Ff-7f PAGE NO.: A -3 ? 6
)
'. .
..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SNEET
TS PARA: .3/4. 8. 2. /. c PAGE NO.: J/4 B-/ 3
TS REQUIREMENT: QC Etscreient Powen Seunens I. E 4* M Ba rran oes Awo
ennestas sana ' Br Dwannrnnrra D/swns.f Evrar / 8 M o u r a.s BY Venoevom
& Dvr Anruny LfLLS &' RAMS $MdW Afd L/13U M L lWOfCAr/DD 0$ Parnen
-
ISSUE DATE: REV.: .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: - .
TITLE: Ssr.f.o d kub b Sketh
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 /[4
Is installed system consistent with TS7 X.
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? X
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should i
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? y
REMARKS: f_br 3 or orer/u res u sed Go~ w JB wa H fo s auf fms mong- g;j,c
% Li af +4r nch % l'a n- .L 4 9. 2.1 e . Camelt- f w pnstw
i>'cLr) ~ nLL 1 n/-E.a.kl n ><;. fr Cu -nie <L-~,
V
wit t -ke es m
T gt,<
atrenLaLla. tar 1r - >L i-a '
n~ r dure s ce viewa are Ar~ c4eela )
.a w a ~ a . - c ,- - r i a ..J>.~ m - . u. . s,,ea. s ur . . u_
'
STATUSdFITEM @l CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? '
35f 0 L.Ylematt F>tutV rs/rtch f f0teksM's et$ sydft't$
INSPECTOR (S): M I /4/s, ,/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-13 PAGE NO.: ./}-39f,_
-
_ . _ _ _ _ _ ._ . _
, , , - - _ _
. ,
a
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 7/4. 8,2. / c. PAGE NO.: 3/4 B /3
Doude; 4", Tuf C ML L - To - C et t Ava ThMI ASA L COWugePlous Aer
el cm 5'r s as. Fder Dr Len R o s t uu C Conrro h/ ore Aurr -Candessou
MArVbn L . T f N'fs/SneDif OP [AtM [fLL -Th - CfLL &* T1rgu sa m
L'o w a ne ric a is i 150 * JD *' Onus . s' 71w- Barrarn~r Canesen. Wou.
Surstr A t Lwasr- 1dB A uf s Fon Cunesuas tk s' 18 Ava 30 Auss
foe C=. s sa IC A r A M ou muu Dr /10.2 \/ oL t.1 fDM. Ar (WASP 4$/Me
l STP Paccanungs
STP- 30.5 - /4 00, REV I. Issur D nrc 3/4}gs"
* BArrCtr IEN * BA10/A 18 Mours lusparcroca '
ST'P - 305 - 14 0 I . 220 0, Issue Dnre 2 //g/g{
" BATTEEY 18W *d870/8 18 MOUTH IWSPECTIDW"
,
'
'
STP- 20.1 - l 6 02. estr D - Issue Dnrs 1/2 /gf
* BATTEM Y l22.2 > BAT.300/ /9 MODTM /N3PECT/0U
S TP - 30S - l60.1. Msv e _, l.ssur Dnra 2/s{}tf
* BkTTERY CHARGER /EWBn CHGR I A LDAD TEST *
\
STP- 307 - I& 04_. R*fu oy Iasu.e Onrs 1/sr/rC
" BATTERY CHARGER IEAIB * CHKR' JB LOAD Th3 7 *
GTP- 203 - 14 0S,
i
RSv 0 -. I.rsur Dnts 3/4]ti
" BA TTELY CHARGER /E22 * 5601 CG R L. DAD TEST
R aunare s tw&n s lim be / Lalow alona ,aiki che -m eess
farm La el m os w ill ,.s Av +-L e y-aeelb asegp i n 1, /, .
trP- 10C ~ lieb z' Ito a weer walkrol kl.~ w.2L +1, *
_
li<e.nse.s. n ,N w nik Jo e im u ir _ a ra I is te ) A,a l. w ,.
: .
srP - Jos~ ~ 110 0. 'srP -Jor- 1L 0 / 4 trr- 103 - 1 A e z
1. A J ) re r
l.u'ra.A J fe - w i b A .- s -meswml u La an,al;/ye/r
l
La u s t - en o 9.
1. 1/. in Cnt emenfraL% im /:s h,J n < a *1 shoa// Le ,
'
i ek ,1) L. N 1%
'
3, A,Id/e A, a < -ma ,K- </o a s mLen J L 9l e<widegou.'
i
INSPECTION REPORT 50-454/ Ff-JJ PAGE NO.: A -39 P -
_ . ___
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ . . _ _ _ . ._ - - . _ - - _
-_- . _ _ . ._
.
'
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3/4, B. L / c PAGE N0.: # 4 6 -/3
4. ueeJ h ru n t., a , J - ,J J v. nu- ~rm. <m anulci .
s- 5 ee 1 ou, < f. c) E ')./] ~ se J st _pr ' e
A L e1.
crp - as s - Atos , s rio -3cc- iso 4- i s rta - 2 os - i s o r
/. M eed<e<< N<n/ Le Le pla<<Jiu as r_e,-ce ah Gema Le.
2. ras 6 es e n.v in its Lin. .r4 s Id 1,e .sn et J- L4, 4-1,
a tl.a r $r) E., hpl.a s /see ds.O ,
u/olL L., o avw - ,1s :
I. un Ar,.iJ ~ J r , t F- ~ '.,ma d' Ln /. 1,J ~1/s i
/c en L,' a Bn/Arru /L , iL 'T~<.t be - l'ecT-10).
s. -nn, ad - so wl, ja,a Q : , a- n, ij L, ac.i s
w ill n n eb- d -)A r to Lles sv.- o sed de o an.s / rue frw
a r i >*li hir_ , . The as air - o LN /c f W " $ L L r e a < u r i A ,,
_
to1,/sv wa c. >,,A L nau-
>% a m -e-/ILn b-J
'
3. T/tr iNorbm A/r C1< Dr Leefor
u ,.N th J ...,nsur-r _- ,a c2 L EL
a sz,c-, ,iaii-. Jna,lrey_J.<<<
%< >,
t u 1.u,,,> % iu S ft*a ,,
~sd>Ke-l frs slosu n -> a e n a ,~i n / r LerL vn}ars.
L 74e -, e r/, fa do,. An,
f I
n L ,'/L -;, n J., ~ A _+"A/B "
i>,obenLin a3 4r, us4 nf ualue the a/nem N _s d fe.
S. rA e srP ,)/d -rno}- lieE LAe Aniien s - Aa r- q 1-ren Le,
\ L$n_/ r Lrds 490 Va /L- im' d anwre ~r/sr's c/rl</ Ac '
a wideJ.
I
&. srP sr.deaduren elsa /, L , ,_s V1 1 ,1/ erie < na a ier EL
f e<l N ^<- +;, d u rro ,. s a r_ ! , - 2 ~ 2
- Li, herifa' f4,/ Ela
sh e saar, a er n a rialh. ijawa ar. LA< L .ans1 a va,'L1(g
is a urlable u,,it <i at,< to , ' L . eda - u t. Ace O s
I
lc uE A .,rreeare. m,d yenseid 3 de ra- san s 1 -rAey
e$eek ano A6l,k L Jeril attsturr Is u d. The-
Ntabivreni>> lIlr ;$ ~ ._ lNa .La var /L 31 J .$/-- ~ ' ~
,,,,,,, ct* J G '
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45Y/ PS-Ir PAGE NO.: _.fr - F/'t . .
- _ _ _ -_. - - . _ __
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
_ _ _ - . _ _ .- __ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ . - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .
'
. .
..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3 /A A s / ./ PAGE NO.: 3/+ B-n ///4
TS REQUIREMENT:
D C Elecho-ir.a/ km,. saamy Oiv E. ItW W dahar-te $ ar,*l
e laraors sAa// L d m onsdr~stfel m nL/r < aa r .e 12 mmfds 4
n Y a fr n a k LAa~ Jna) Msf Nffle u.% / r~
#
}.m
LIC.PROCEDUREk0.: _ * ( ,, ISSUE DATE: f , .
>
REV.: i ,
TITLE: Sc, furttinvah k Ski d *
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? _ _ /A /
Is installed system consistent with TS7 x
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or .y
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? x '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should .
F/4'
.
! work as written?
3
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? y
a fond dasA~ n ara.g.
REMARKS: na 3 yearr,/ ara r ner ared La ra
aa et~. hm / L-~ L km. 17/- 2M -u B4 }r ,as i n rr y pL 1 A. Q 4 ;y
seus are YNo$)e h As r~ruirIHrs Ar LLa / /rn k 1- 12xim$ wpm
N L u ) La A,N sh - L r ~ rinJ~ A u>l41 I+4r dier- s;r p \r, 4
& b w uer Jare d zrasw n,a s'}A kAs 1**S m laaJ Aaai tu
STATUS OF ITEM M# CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
, }$f C LAltMtt mys+ corr ee.1 s vos ejarn '
251 _ & Liten ce na re wive TS/ trois *LM cs ft<>T
INSPECTOR (S): _K. 4(,dard
. FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES y
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S): f
!
It;SPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Fi-3f PAGE N0.: ._A -j od ._
l
!
- ._ _ . _ . . . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ , - . _ _ , . _ _ . . . _ , _ _ - - _ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . . , _ - . . _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ _ . _
.
.
.
*
.,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 7/f. g.s./ ,L PAGE NO.: J/+ B-/7 (/y .
la, , ) 1% ner arafw
' r* s Panair m sa fs dav, Pal: m. m Lw
' Ee<w,iuaJvn /In
.a :h1 ts#.1rz~ 4-f o u)L.*le wt 4= aL.'m iY
i
.'.E les~ v'o /ss .
Peores/a re.s 't
S rP - 3'o.<~~ /t a 4 . deu o. Issue Dal< 7131/r4 i
"Scruice Dlrelarar ~n.s4 pel dadheries tena+derNin '
sr~p . 3Df- u n '7 W fea 6. ' Iss u e D. ale 3A21/92~
I
" daf f e rs 16DA$AAro/B servtre Dis eAme-< a ~rr s e a
Srp -2os /4DB 3 fr s 0; Is r see Do Le 3}/ tar.c '
" 2nIten Iaf22 * der'spel sarvsee Dis e Am TPr& '
V
f
feamaeks t%, e o - oe b t.,,,,, f, a, Aiw .
srs.2or noi r e =A: (D Redo ser & rn t3 pneoucucy
+o La em a,1m_-/ wist +A, rs -,= J rrp~20s
~
thof.
io ,A(u .i L Jn-~ sa>,e i,,4in
.Q . 14 Jo saen. rant 4. s '
fen < .l}! < 1SBT mJ H)f/c Ay/ary. lu / _ J<
- na,L ee,/ he 4e,- .us,-ic.w ou r on no & M rs e La,.;
r om . Thaf cM cc s la 15% prLor*L.j reA *-
in M LaL.
fl.1- h u, / -ede bo nAs 1, <
'Arir 4 2 s~. 2 is 5,. / < ~ s,\ / K M D 2. r. 2.
(D .
STi d- '10 Y - AO '] Des ) 20 3 - lidt m ml l^ be wln t erl nk &e
Inled- IGr,rrate '"Wstpr, - 1nn ok serl'as L o / 1.0,
srp~2o<-/ tor s w n,.Ji.- L u. I oacredhaHer -n A .
Q). Add less 4-s^b - 199 T be ReAsn - se l/~ 2.d
D. eau /~ r,4- vala e so </% w
care
b0 e br*<<1
relA L,bsJ ,,f A ntf ha b*m LAJ /E n- b' S$= delb Se l?
!
u)/d He ,o m <A le /w r-e<0A eed u%.
"
- *- f
WO
^
?_ . E f MNf_ /alh
sws sea,<<J.,re har >,oi ks , wa te</ do.o n .
ri,e snL ed aeocea/uror turre no + wa/4 el dwn L. +4r
!
a
I k sezik,~.
INSPECTION REPORT 50 4M' $$-15 PAGE NO.: _d - y0 I '
{
..
., .
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: .VA f.2. / e g f PAGE NO.: J/4 g./4
TS REQUIREMENT: D. C Eleeb<fea/ fomer Saa r = r Os*v 2.1T. a' m'
da2/er.;e ,
urm2 0Ln m mAnJJLe ,)*>.<as<14ra & J npar.aL4 esery 1 o ,,,e>.ds
,
L ver-r4l-a klea 4- &Ar ha41le.ru enoacid., #
is a2- /en / mM r +1,,
Lli.PROCEDURENO.: 1_ _,ISSl[EDATE: , ,
REV.: , [
TITLE: See Confleea+#h Sketh '
- YES N_0
;
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? A['g
Is installed system consistent with TS? %
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or x
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? y
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should y
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? g
REMARKS: m 1 w t ,o r a ta l m , on un a) 1-o rws. a neroGo m w,e ,/;sch,y
bert: a,, +4e y >.ts, a n Anativu L,s.ks . s79- 2df- l 100 ic >,a&areep a4/g j
a; I& meeds c-;/sde rwm{r-k' L eame b 0rma de ?><d Tec/yits/ prok/ennt.
paiIR.- i n is are m A //aase 67"P~ .1of- 11e/ -- L The -wa rra nGe6+reis
.gaU raseik meeds be be imeluY su to M / .1. 4.2 }4'9a 4o 2.2
'
STATUSOFITEM
E
@ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? *
%0 D N Ctett( mus $ ttstret V frw&_f
IhSPECTOR(S): k., A. (()c4 rcl
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ fi-7f PAGE NO.: A--Y04-
*
< ;
,, _
,. _ _, , - _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . -- _ ___ _ _ _ _.
.
.
, ..
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: N 7 A.i ei F PAGE NO.: 7/Y P -/'t
n b on>% - ~ f-t%.Dels wn-a s;,, K r-c', ro b.u wL~ ~Lrded ~
e
O
ba (or eforwo u er dir e la carg Jm A .
<
-
Peo << Ju er s s
sr9 - to s"- s' Joe , Rev I sss<e n. , le
'
. :
'
" Rm kha ~ JAirnA+2ATO1A $r>-f c. -~~ Hr/ Oise$ ara ~T"k n f ** *
'
STP- 30r It go 1 -/ As / , hseae r2a-fr eh/rs~ '
Bla L bs ese 1#Alat 4- AAfD I & Arfersranare 1]n r Anear '
7)$ #
sno-2osd1%E. i
Ao ,
i
isrue Dn-/> -
" daideru IG2 % 847.soct fer/w - <a Du elaca 7 ac+
f
f ,
f -----ks & D o t 2. + f A u uirs ) daur_:_ - =' a J-l 6 it ma L n. le '
t % e n la C a l l d L ~ h T,e e w n m
*
,J sd - s. uJ
af ejedeul 11. ferer-- -1.,nb. -in /s in e d w / use Nf
o% sa la L.)'A ,rlla . f Earrol~t/2lew:W /* $~ f a , y ,-f
1. L s le w l e sam A ar,'LL s 2 . f.1. .
i 979- 203-170 3 8 1. r*meer a [ &rmbe a n 4 /e- s.
'
l2. Acre In rs t%:L- :- i.e ,s d n ~ a le i r . d/1 sa a -<
l10l- 'L fn enan d .?. 2- to Se tw *Y an) rem = - And be
a a n). H. Alor ) $ $ N rd_ r= E. uldr der- Jaa. :L ,.-e, . ,
<
O
Of S O $ MM s' a . Mb Y E I" ^ ^
.S/1 (' 1 'Yo ew,as La /I _d ->ns.2 sarad a/dn sa teris. rom .
l. fraurds n - // /o%es fsr- enrA eboy i _
/-r) $ ~111.
7. lla ra an .d 1. b5 is tY emeis h 4 wlLA .12 3 f. 2.
l
!
' R. AirollI re card els'c $ ref/h) f L J e en, /r , lle S*
l 9 ^ !J +J Lm r Al cw e i+ -
, 1,., nra -acints mJau .
v
l
- J
!
! !
;
i
i
!
- l
INSPECTION REPORT 50-45F/ 75-35 PAGE NO.: _6 -MQ
_ _ .
- - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - . - - . - - _ _ _ _ ._
_ _ _ _ . . -.
- - - _ - - - _ - - - - - - - _ -. - -
'
.
..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: JA. A ,2. 2. PAGE N0.: J/4 s-//,
O i v E. 1 T c'112' k b Lee,a ,
TS REQUIREMENT: _ o e 21st Ar frof /e uJer So urre 1
ad eL es da// Ae ds e m ebralef yy 2 A= per wr-ve///urr
<<aai '
m a As 4.22.I e REV.: -
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.- ISSUE DATE:
,
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? (
Is installed system consistent with TS? \
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
M
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should \
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REHARKS: 47,s S7'? oneedas.a e r n ,;ee) L LA,) T9 yeaui m d
_
us *Y Yr yh*altY ! > du T j2n in n en mle
'
3/4 r 1. 2. }.
resi~i w /tu;Da c . See .14. e . 2!/. - . .sh . s.2. i . 6.
' '
a s. 2. i. i , - .18. sa i. 2 a m . a. 2.i. e n.
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
INSPECTOR (S): Ke4. Weed
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ,
YES @
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-ff PAGE NO.: 4 '(0 Y
,
..
-
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: .$4.B.3.
/ / / %,8.x g PAGE NO.: J/4 #-/7 74~ F-22
TS REQUIREHENT:
r),e 40 cia r.zr*TE a d De OEVI, 'TL.1l2' Powes~
);, +<;1. aMar n c L, L J i, W4. 9 . r.1 rLH Le </r Lee turd enego)<d
'
m)- J J m eo s. a u 91, L ver>L s a,~,-e el been de a /;a -au f '
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: M-ssr-ohI[SUEDATE:' v d /u.u/ REV.: vod /n ue./
TITLE: Sec. '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
-
% -
Is installed system consistent with TS? j #g
/ .
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or K
editorial)? X
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should _ @_.-
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? Q '
Srp-so2-0/o1 ha.s bee n on rals, J. srs- neo - o/es
REMARKS:
+-9. s t g
wi11 r%elub cAe ur vet /hvree r e'h,
'
r u ?r = ~ b a/ r~s
4.. t . 1 2 . srs- ooo -otos ew e Jea- s'swe./. Ls /- ,y
4 ,. . ,,) 1% elub +A, su,.ser//ne,.e ,%, ,Ce m ar,J &
*
_.yl,e Ac s' D e Dis .C 1r d'171'~ power- Ar/viL.6L Sy,i n
STATUS OF ITEM (,(PE!D CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN7
3Gl
(0 lit &t so m v5f 11 ntt frec e Ave ts Y* IM oYyah T.T res vo'ersseJy
INSPECTOR (S): K.d (d.ed
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-7f
PAGE NO.: A '/ v f
J
.*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: J/f.8 5 PAGE NO.: N 8-/7 7% m F-2'1 '
I
TS REQUIREMENT: A.. .. i _- .i
~
.
" ^
e ISSUE DATE: REV.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO :
F
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
%
!s installed system consistent with TS? y,#,
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or y
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 66t
ogf;r
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? [/7
favlawee ew i.' sea 44a und' Are en k in., the up.s ,oSt
REMARKS: /.
la% < Aaw ea,h Lt- e4 w . t> P s susd are As,L a
1,a,- w i5,,
L> aa en Lad w it.L ~ 5 deara 4 D L du et ,u, N4 is A
pe!c d. 2. /k imy 's -2 / , is 64e sEm G m d t~ a a el.,,,4,
x.I < h.I Ins b4 -~ere et 7 se- skauld 1% L eit4.<
STATUS OF ITEM QETNJ CLOSED '
s
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
M O MAL mdt re selet
]G) G) NM nt os h Orreti s delth ea f
INSPECTOR (S): K.h.(d4rd
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problemsildentified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A-yof,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5 -1 5
;
_ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ ___ __- _________________ ___________ - _ _ __-____
. .f
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/v.f 4. / PAGE NO.: 3 / 4 B - 2 4 4' v
TS REQUIREMENT:
# f. V. /. 4 -/ 4 .* Ckck af Yh t set =.,v (A h r m cot
64fm coalve+w over surud prohMn kevras sks,s is.15 Ale 3.1,y. t-l
's4 4 6, ole w. & fe.1 m i 4It.'
-
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
-
ISSUE DATE: - --- REV.:
TITLE: #fu c e n+fiv '4"h% sk eof
'
YES M '
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? N
!s installed system consistent with TS? .y-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 9 s
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should v/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? v/
REMARKS: * Pro cee&w re view m- -: 4.e set rris / sin rs nia
uof c ons kfref.
'
~
:
/d -r.s c .-+a it + voog m .ki M vene n om wayb iA; of e4e.g v. h
a. e. 4. 2. es,ss & v. r. u. / ~ .s y 2 - 2 4 .
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS". WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
36'i fra m i f e : .(T) '
.
"
cere .ra.t~ " Q . '
a a iia '
365 pree, M (. ) 6%ur or . u Aa- ,.
WA c. +s cor,re E T S .' ' .
INSPECTOR (S): C4 c. H <r f.uc/c ,
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES &
e
Were problems corrected?
-
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS 0F ITEM OPEN CLOSED
I
'
REMARKS:
l
l
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5'-tc PAGE NO.: 4- W)
1
J
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
- .
',
'
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: rN, P. M / PAGE NO.: MV J' -2 y , 2.s'
\ hacedsret.
M F. '/. / a . / : sTr' - 3 d 2 - 16 0 6 ftev- o e-zi - af
crf ~ 30 2 - ILo2 Aer O 1 - G ~ 25'
e,r. v.t, a . 2 (d. s ed : sre - 20 3 -is o r auo a- r - se
(le v o ( ~ l 1 - S S~
'/. 9. 'fo i . /> l CTP - 163*I?d'o
S7t' ~ 30 3 ~ # 0
A** i 4 ~ # ' ' A *~
AENMK.C -
(d srP -son -IG o I </20 v 13retten d e er /s s / A , J is>,' d Te d
e de & st4N4 bl514
(g) s7p- 30z -q&c f Clutwl Ca$. 0$ Pr4+edEt Rela.f L AcaSt4'32
ckam.e CaC&,4,:, er) Miecm Retarp s r.
a r e - 2 o t - ts o s'
Actt 37 m .4 acg39
. 6 c % p r a cod <sts.t.
hw lo tes, saajkstosneaf 63 lo er n .a.t,
e4 w o.u' runb . The proceduaa.
a-J v,u m es eu t enn
b V* [Cl #fMAM{ $ YU @*P d
Gtl it 0 /LebefN#
Wa rt o n .
a
.J (f rs a.8.a. t a .1 cu w u n >,A e x 1. W ; /i c -<,
,2<<& s sak ,oe mde<a 3 <a -ii o i /s wr
/tsa niun:imod
(4 30 3 - n o o , 3 6 2 -t ? oo A./o f Am/owd .
<
!
l
,
!
INSPECTIONREPORT505ffs/FJ-U
PAGE NO.: M OP
.
.
j
'
.
i
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/V. E. V, .2 PAGE NO.: 3/v S- 7 /
TS REQUIREMENT: 4. 2. V. 2. Ha osts en n ..] p u rev /<d A,e.b
da0 H afis,e ntr % , n / e rr a A at p a/ _ & e d e n a. e .wr /P me>,tha
$1 M8sWit A< d 64f w$ 0>tt-An Al el "
f<1eh fu / < s"/' ettit<<<V (cen %<'w /
# REV.:
LI'C.PROCEDUR[NO.:
^
-
#
ISSUEDAd: - -
"j{
TITLE:
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is installed system consistent with TS? /
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
,t/[A
'
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: Assane etc'<, ris , ors esdat e eaAA Vo
'
s e, Js, ,,,
' #
/Lil T nie ts/b Ne< V .'
t
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
*
'
}i,Y L e esou to u,sr u &s juvwadet<.e .
AJ A e hNetsap ,
'
INSPECTOR (S):
C.C, da r ( * clr
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
N_0
Were problems corrected? .
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ F5-35 PAGE NO.: A-YOY
.l;
i
l
'
,
*
..
. .
1
. , -
2~. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
_
TS PARA: ydt f, y, z - PAGE NO.: 3/v # .7/
4. b Y. 2.
b>-cafar s uf, fsu
TS Aestadnad NeulimAf } ~ e>,
'
& '....
.
%
e
i
i
,
INSPECTION. REPORT 50-457/ P5- 35 PAGEN0.: kdf/0
. :.
n;-
...
,
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: s/K 8. E 3 PAGE NO.: MV P- r3
-TS REQUIREMENT: - 4/, 8, M J' . 4 & deve ces,1- > /eAs e &<zh '
m o ,,,en h eclz cAs-s4 Aaff k !&./esn ew2/ wenn et e
'
frs 4 % c m a% < ! A a c ktwA -kcleNaf dd ead, ad 1/w <<,,) (enQ
~
LIC.'PRdCEDURENO.: s v- rop-/7eo ISSUE DATE: '/ - 23 -JT REV.: /
'
TITLE:. Ehdn ea O Pra eA h %~46, Nawf %eA-n,.:/ n,p
# '
YES JLO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
Is-installed system consistent with TS? ,/
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? s
'
REMARKS: G 7S rehuttses
f
mveu<a.f n, i
E I
f, /
I
.
2. I , 4 / S , 2 , 5-
(.d Laserr un Ta crusenLurt
@ Pr o a chw si ch '7. 3, ( 5 s t,o J) tre os) .
*
N shoah0 &a A "(Lua Am.un et, u 6 o de ansf vsI % e k n 2 0 we. ."
(11 na J v of deu a- ' uddh va h a.or +% oMD md (e e, % J-()
M
'
#
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
.FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
'
Q L-doiis e t en es+ cs rev s+ prosealvae
J47
370 G94 er w inust imslensi+ lstt's : .
.
AAd sAncf/ A-dbuas .'
INSPECTOR (S): C<Ci#4thuc'&
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? .
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ f5-35 PAGE NO.: k-fl/
j).
I
. . _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - . __ _ - - _ _ _ _ - __ _-- . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
,
* [.
,
,,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
l N/v p-Ja
3A/ . P, '/, I PAGE NO.:
,
TS PARA: '
f
y. P. 9', 3 A
a d ca o suo r oca, a
Ts (2 onwa m <J =
(essi w LA ) -
,
N f* M#g
'I l O ( O M b ) b
h
& u, +4u -pu<.uue .ar mnL,
~
'
w k,e 4 u o 8 , h,'dee
s
l% ad., : (s] (e e>dsu usa ) _
*#'
flu 4<f Sp pr f# # o3 * M
l
!
l'
l
!
!
!
..
f
-
1
,
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4ff/ fi-75
PAGE NO.: h 5(IA
L ,
F
'
.
/
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'
TS PARA: SN,3. V 2 PAGE NO.: 3/Y E-73
TS REQUIREMENT:
MP.V,7.4 Se f_ C(Ahh v44fm 54 et h
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: p/'-fdW/teo ISSUE DATE: V-2 v-p r' REV.: /
TITLE: EPA dtan,rr) 6 Lin<f A
YES M
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #//f
Is installed system consistent with TS7 eM
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
/ ,oce ,7 g,u , Jr.-
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? p/,f ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should q/4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? s/4-
REMARKS D ) T S f* * 's % </E<W*3 S /<v/.2 ca e$ emstij
'
( Aul A 'bs l A >'n M )
(Ars endua n>o wd nint<A./)
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? ,
37l NKLA_sd e ref 75 .
i o _
- - - .
I
INSPECTOR (S): CC . HW S " k.
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
l
j STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
! REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPOP,T 50-458/ If-U PAGE NO.: 690
l
l
_ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - - _ _ - _ _ __. _
_ . - - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . - _ _. _.
e
*$
'.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: .3/4'< M I'd- PAGE NO.: 1/'/ 8"33
v.2,'/, L 4
Yb-ad!rvt AAS e/jedd .stura -nt s>ufsru< a FAaw6
i v
.dd/ de s%% w) oPen4et c : ,
'
$Y.l Yld ef D 1A*/ -/2/4 /$ M1eit b4 W&r/>td//vf4
I /
Ad eft n de $, er f ov61 vsl/'<r& <
tur<br Vs/la 1/ i anl
' a - < ci
$A44 f ANtf C<sJ *N$ ll b'$Y)*/l leb t'E /t
'
)
tr
'
c7 / ' ,
.
kr / {Aff i 4 01
b'$c'llb
*f % )hte$ cff) {
/
/ f /
AnueAsd/I aaZ- <t<Wa<A ar/ Wu '
sow?'ars/a
/
s s h at W- Ah -
YtY-All
,
$bf
/2/ /L,/44) , ,
, , -
'
8%/WLs etm(I V/ 1url HC d//Hsne1 a
& -/s
<
2
uy e
/. srer vs/A< rf ch
Vetc
g, 4;.,,4,Vo</E ys C A"Q * " S">8u< II
1 t/& A ,b n e a<n ,
_.
f l h
INSPECTION REPORT 50-451/ Ff-if
PAGE NO.: h-'f(Y
;
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 41 2 C.J.A PAGE NO.: 3 /'l 7 -V
TS REQUIREMENT: Verify unirtimons Sih cson+- vak clariosq
'
"
PueI unloaday
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ST/-ow-80*f ISSUE DATE: P/Av/1Y REV.: O
TITLE: Ordly
(
OMn,hh
'
her'
.
/
YES $0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Nur Venemc-o
Is installed system consistent with TS? NvrvenervEse
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? X '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should NOT ved.tFl&/)
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? X
REMARKS: @ TS aIIvwi count rafty less f b .$ O,'/ cFi, ThFi if
Codosery 4n NelIt (tore derform4me) brocktt
CS YC4Y tL et !n O t. Pro t ebre
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
#
37.L O NILC attsst corruf TS
77) @ h yf an ll A nusf b:Lovmfe lafers
,
INSPECTOR (S): Da Ie A, fowers
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO,
:
Were problems corrected?
E
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5 - 35 PAGE N0.: N9(I
.
_
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4.9.R.C.3.O
/ PAGE NO.: J// 9- 4/
TS REQUIREMENT: 1/rRi A V W/A//4 det 3441 coc/A/T 2k7E
PR t O Q Tc Arlb hdR./ Als pus L 40 A h/afA
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: ste-oeo-ocer ISSUE DATE: 8/29/84/ REV.: O
TITLE: 3Att 9 8 PtRA-Tidd t0G S
'
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Ng t/rrir/e/)
Is installed system consistent with TS? do T VCRI F/E>
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial
Does proce ure carry out TS requirement? X '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that.it should A/0T t/CR.t F/Eb
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? X
REMARKS: THE f*20cfdtJK f 30 ES Alo7 Shk25~5
THE 7tcN. s t'cc . iP r Q ui c c M cA)Vs.
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
APPu e ndT 6ModL.b RO UlNE AAl AffR fR/8"f6
}7tf THE
pro caQ JRE" ~ro e t- /SSUAA/c e*
PR/e R.-
INSPECTOR (S): "M IE A 2d/4 S
/ R.S
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 95* 35 PAGE NO.: A - 4 H-
)
,
7-
.
'
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M 1. Y PAGE NO.: -$/ 9 9-f
TS REQUIREMENT: 1/ERIFV RFAcfro /t SU G c R t Tr c,4 L 7: n R
2V hove.s
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STr-oss-o7of ISSUE DATE: NA REV.: A/6
TITLE: SO B cR n t cht-I T Y VCA I Foc M/oAl RE~Puetid6
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
AoT VEN/Mrb
Is installed system consistent with TS? No r trexiF/e-h
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial)?
Does proced Nrry#out TS requirement? %
*
Doestheprocekurewalkdownindicatethat.itshould g/)
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? #A
REMARKS: TNG~ PRoceb utte is ist b R A F T- roam ndh
ACT As/h L A-B LE.
*
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
31) THE AMLechdr musr WEVELO P THE PK0ct~bt)Rh PRIO R
1~0 /hou/Al& TR2kb /A-Ttb Pue L .
'
INSPECTOR (S): 14/5 /) . POWENS
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
IhSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ti-35 PAGE NO.: k-VI7
- . - . . - - . . . - -. __ . _ _ _ . . _ - _ _ _ _ .
_
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M. 9. lo PAGE NO.: 3[F 9-#
TS REQUIREMENT: 3EMo^l S TRA*TE /)PE%BIL I 9 6 f' EACO R(FdEUd4
Ad wor FOEL AA AlbLtd4 PLATPOR n1 Ho 15T
1/3//6f
'
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STP-055- 07ee. ISSUE DATE: REV.: O
TITLE: REPUEL PL A 1 foK m HolsT o PCRA B /LITY
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 No T VEA t FiEb
Is installed system consistent with TS? X
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or y
editorial ?
MEAA 10 X
Does proce re carry out TS requirement? ,
'
Does the proce re walkdown indicate that it should >(
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? X
CALLS FO R A G oo A ALB
REMARKS: QTD/C PRocELOR6
h I2-56 Pondb ht)MiHY LOAh. Tl4E~SE tati c a v s
k)CR C A P PA R rAl T*L's' Al0 T ALM /LA R LG.@)7WE Peoc<buRC
nhlb EGut Pon EAT DO NOT Ab b RGSC OR MAG Posr/84 E
THE FULLflLL/A)6 0P ~rH E TECH. S ftc . R Et901REMtn/TS F. $ ft .
M
'
STATUS OF ITEM CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7
)74 hME AffL ic Arj 7" ntg/s r- PROtlI b E THE kmntY 4/E/GH rs .
;y THE A PFL1C AMT N10ST INSTALL 2 IN TER Loc k.$ A ^l bWRoll/DE~
PRoceb t)RGrs Po R Tec a, spec. 4. 9.4 r 4 4 . A LL Pk t 0 R. To 0 L. .
INSPECTOR (S): ~D4 LE~ A. PoblCR.,f
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES M
Were problems corrected?
'Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff 3 f PAGE NO.: A 'f f)
J
-
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
.
TS PARA: //. f 7. / PAGE NO.: JN 9- f
TS REQUIREMENT: Pgrvenir Lo4bs G e r4Ta-e r # 4 ^/ i zo o
pooN bs FRom DuCR VvCL- /1$3fM ALI Es I& TAC SPt'AIT
fR ' Nca) fort s rbtAC. E 700 L s ex TA'nn/$FCE ~Poo Ls
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 317. oss-ows ISSUE DATE: l/z/es" REV.: o
TITLE: FUCL gotQmg cR4Mg mgycatcAf ~7 RESTM s c~t/d JS
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? vor Vcf1Eig,b
Is installed system consistent with TS? .NoT- VERIFi e-b
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial ?
GM Te
Does proce uregcarry out TS requirement? X
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should Ng
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? $
REMARKS: "L A TCR '.s To Ec MbhEb d)/LL /Vo r dYFC'E.'T" ~n& E~
PRocCbUAAL A 5PEC~rs ~r"WA Y PUL L. PtLL ~f"H E 7~EE.H .
2 pes. R FQJn R 6*Ma~ alt.
-
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
'
,; Q Y M C A t f Ls c A N 1~ m us1~ ADh * L kTER 's To ~rHer ~ Pro c ebd K E
PR t oe. To o t- r ssvAnte er .
INSPECTOR (S): BALE' A. ToLA/CA.5
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
.
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ fi-U PAGE NO.: 4~ 4l 1
)
,
.
O
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M 9 M 2 2. PAGE NO.: J/f'9-e5-
TS REQUIREMENT: Fwc riodA L 775 r * 0MC- Ko h - *U T " RE PtJt %
fddlT/0 A) /AIT'6C L oc /(
F//7/Kf' REY.: O
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: s7F-os!-o70o ISSUE DATE:
TITLE: Meyer andbE SW ITc.M REFUrLJAJG IN TLKS FOMCTiedA L TCSF
YES g,
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g VTAIFIED
!s installed system consistent with TS? Nor VE @
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or -
X
editoria1{? X
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
p ,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should NoT V C m pi e.b
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? Y
REMARKS THE ilot Ebu R.C 's PJRPoss tANh fee cusuc.V ho NOT
/D4 Tc H TMC IdT0lT O F~ THE Teca, spec.. Rs-a ul Rr/H 6v 7 .
THE PforandRE EF FE RE A/c ES ( s Al TanrT- AlOT* l A/ EtT68EA[CI~
surnash sop- 00'11 WH ICH t s> J H comp t E TG ( u.v. . "LMtt 's "
N6TDEbi.
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
.
.s terius foR Puefosc,
$99 @T*ble APPt.tcAWr owsr newsc THc PnocotRc's
yyg PRandENc6 Aalb REF6tt.NES. At so.WUC MeerbURn* Is UN US*A R LG'
s18cc so P- o o *1 is re com h err. NEED FRIDR 'r0 0 L. ISS UANC 6"
INSPECTOR (5): .bu!~ 4 'Poul(K.S
FOLLNUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSFECTION REPORT 50-458/ M-li PAGE NO.: 4-Ya O
J
r
*
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SdEET
TS PARA: M % /2 3 PAGE NO.: 3/f/8-/7
TS REQUIREMENT: \lEAIFV O PE R A 6'L l T-Y oF /dc L INFD Fue L
T~MdsPCR Ss).3 7CAA / W TER L O CXS , PA Ltd s W rr~D /)ES,
GLOCKidG i!'f L V E . &^f.h f(CVLock 3W J Tc H E,5
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: E/A ISSUE DATE: M4 REV.: ^/A
TITLE: Md
'
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 Nor V E g a Fleb
Is installed system consistent with TS7 /V4 r v r N/ n e.o
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or X
editorial
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? K *
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should A/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
X
REMARKS: M0 PROC tbOR E A L/A / L A-B L C.
STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7
CLOSED
A Pf'LIc Ait/ T D1t/3Y bEV m? 7'Nk- Proc 0huRe
38) THr /J3UAAlc f ,
PR o o R. TO OL
.
INSPECTOR (S): 3)Atr A. Po taeRs
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REDORT 50-458/
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
i
l INSPECTOR (S):
thSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7t- 33 PAGE NO.: MY L/
h
L J
_ _ _ _ _ _ _. . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ ._. _ _ _________ _ -_-_
.
o
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4.10. } PAGE NO.: 3/4 /0-1
TS REQUIREMENT: 7#6 THERMAL PsWfR AND # FACTOR (00LANT TfM9fRATV86
SMALL BL JERIFnEn Tn BE WITHIM THE LIMf 7S A7 LfAAT M(f 96R
HOUR Dun 1NG LOW 9MR PHYSM6 TESTS.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 579 o% 4704 ISSUE DATE: l-I! 9G REY.: O 41
TITLE: TM f t rV ' Mr f eno FrfdToP mIf t!7 T.YS7 ton T<rnFi vt)T*)fr 1reofvbi':tl
ownv t o w) Fame ro wcs- ,tsi -
ygg y
- l.Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? /
2,Is installed system consistent with TS? NA tM
3,Are there any problems with the TS (factual or / '
editorial)?
4.Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
fi.Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
6.Haslicenseecompletedprocedurewalkdown? V
REMARKS: h SV & ltt/\wrr sf r/i]}pr trif r475 su3vio inetvor pr o 3,{ ar e; 7 ( or
"n nrnuo t orono en unioP o n10t n Tr notortll y ( M 1 ffor t wnwR vf int
mp1 illnNICAL staff IS fff!(rJ f A H D h Piftf C utt) Pit (Itstf n1a nlf PHY!ffb f(S7,"
Fwu tment 'cc7? w irrt nMem c51- M00
@. "17t P 7.4 - ru ' v>Ve r
STrP 15 - ntc0 Ts ciisar vo n n on7nsti 1et YttbL Pr>>lt M
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN? .
k.L ?, NRC Rf(OHCILf: t3Y F0f L LOAD
gg) 5. LIrr' t KC f Af- C nHi l Lf PY f t>( L t_ onn
INSPECTOR (S): DWl/;HT D_ GArM(RLAIN
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES fLO
.
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS: ,
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/7f-33 PAGE NO.: h-Y L.1
J
.
-. _ _ __
'
e
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA C0tTlf.UATIGr. SHEET
TS PARA: 4.10 1 PAGE NO.: 3/4- J0-1
RLthhPMS ,* kon1m0(0) (& STr-P 7. b - N il o Tn Icro TrFY owited Poin7s
ON f,E c c9 CC R 8 33- 8(>04 t40 Lhet L 00 (U0VDCR ,
A 77t.c M urw n7 2 - c olt):n a ~7.7 SHSULD FL tof Nrun(0 AS [T$)
.
'
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4 S/ 75-35 PAGE NO.: A--%1
- . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _
t
$
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 10.2 PAGE NO.: 3/4 IO-2
TS REQUIREMENT: @lEN TH6 6E Ol'f 4c E con 57RA NTS frrivdAFD ON (CtJTROL
MD GROUPA HY TW RDC 6 NRF RYM6';r-n '
U@lFY : ('s t ri nn nauhTIcM
9tf(T)
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STP 500-47d5 ISSUE DATE: 1-07-75 REV.: o ai
TITLE: pod C1Out tn( w v'Irtrn m n + rel RPv; m e (~nssro
v rop rr ;Torir.
~ ~ ' '
YES NO
I Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? UA n /,
2 Is installed system consistent with TS7 N0 fl0
3. Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
4 Does procedure carry out TS requirement? /
'
6, Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written? rm,
6, Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
Pno W ,sTo w t,Pr REC 0ROCD add ULRIFlco Por Pf fwHo
REMARKS:@)titront
P0';tTJ0N LINilT6 ARE NOT lPJDIC ATE D
6) 4.10.2 cu wnk rMn 7 of ret 4 7C0l P.0D $ (Roth I00 N R00 Df H$11Y
'
10$7(200 Al 15'A
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7 ,
UY O HM Rf (OHr f t f BY (Uf I lofs0
NV 60 Li((NM( RH 6t4fil ( PY (0(L [.0AD
INSPECTOR (S): D @ (,111 D. QldM8FRl AIN
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 0
,N,0
.
Were problems corrected?
i
Were any other problems identificd?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (5):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5- 35 PAGE NO.: 4 'IW
i
,
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ___ _
.
o
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA C0tiilt.UAT10f. SHEET
TS PARA: 4.lb,2 PAGE N0.: M1 10-2
4, WITHIN A H0VRS P8lCR 70 BY PA<AING ANY 66GUfNCE (CN6 TRAIN T
I1HD t\T LLnGT CNcl l'l R I2 HOURS WYlLL ANY 6!-QJLNCC- CCNSTRAINT
l5 8Y PA55r- D THAT MOVE MENT (f TH6 CONTROL R005 FAor/l
75 % 800 Oc'N6lTY TO T)l6 8965 LOW P0w68 60.TP0lNT 15
E S TABil5H6D (ONJ$ol ROD ' f GVf N(Ib ,_
'
LlrAITFD 70 TH6
F6R Tit 6. SPEC \flGO TES T, 11ND
b, CONroRMAN(E VJt Tfl THIS SI)fflFl(ATild AND TE67 Ph'0(t:Dl)RE5
BY A SEccND l.l(EN560 Cf6RATOR CR 0TH68 TCCt/Nici)LLY
(s>0hldf lf D 1MMB(R W THf \) HIT 1( OI NIC Al. STAFF.
_
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50-Ut/_Pf-U PAGE NO.: 4 't M___
.
_ _ _ _ _ __.
- _ _ . . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _______ _ ____ - ---- _ _ __ -- _ _ _
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
l
TS PARA: 4,10,3 PAGE N0.: M4 10-3
TS REQUIRENENT: WITHld 30 MMUT66 PRlnR 70 nHD AT LfAST ONC6
PER l2 HntlRS DURNG THf+ PER FORMnN(f 0F A RHOTDoaN
wARGtu D6r/10NSTRn'flod t!GRIFV THAT * (Sf6 CodTINUhTIcd 6HEET) '
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.:.579 GoI 3 40l ISSUE DATE: 2- tF- Ff REV.: 0 tg
TITLE: CH 0*f D00lv enpRrIn cr tMusTP ATel
l *
I YES N0
1. Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? uA _ NA
2. Is installed system consistent with TS? NA NA
,
3. Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
1 editorial)?
4,Does procedure carry out TS requirement? O '
5.Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
6,Haslicenseecompletedprocedurewalkdown? /
4$rao Wneca invagr5
REMARKS: h DATA9tt i 1 2 or 5TP. oso >(>01
H 9%r,er, ts at Tr(HtW ht ert(Ir vnTm 4,W3 - tonTeRIAL. U M MEH15 Dfo rA
%Il1 2 Gil,TI0tl (ljd mMO mrar ' Nt no Starths rm ren cystere erv sfqt r
tre 9t twornrum 3,lA 2 *O)fr7sut (2) suuto srne A situ <o Lletrain ettentes a
*
wtr srwaverat ?rr.uvetu wtmeu x M oror rrrnwtn cint( . . .
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7 .
Iff, 3. HR( Af (nrJC lL( 81 ft)H f.OAD
M) 4, l lf frJSF(- f((dHill(- PY FIN I L0bD
& L LiriHSFf PI ( 0d f IL( bY FUfL LnhD
INSPECTOR (S): DWl(,H 7 D. CHht46fRJIfl
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/__
YES NO
Were problems corrected? .
i
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (5):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ M - # PAGE NO. Md
.
t 4 i
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ORTA CONiltiUA110!,14!Ei i
l
l
TS PARA: d.IO 3 PAGE NO.: 3/4 .l0-3 l
g Ttf(- SCVRC(- RhNr.(: MCHITbHS nR( (PGRnBl(; ('(R s('t-ciftCA TION
M.2 WITil TH6:
1. RPS GRGLIIT9Y " 5)l0R TIN (- l.lNK4' Rf rd0l/60 08 '
2. 800 fnTTERH CONTG 0L S1 STEM C(LRn6LE PER SfLCIFICATICry B ],4,2
b A scc 0ND ucCNGED &6 R070R cfL 07Hf R TrCHNI(ALLY (fVAlliff 0 l
u1unnt.R OF TH6 () NIT TECllHICAL SinfF IS PRESENT nNo \'ERlFIES
cornplInNc f wlin THf 'MluTonda DEtahl6TRnTrtrd PRoun0RFS,pHO l
C. NO OTtltR CORG hLTGRnT10HS ARL lN PROGRGSS
l
f(r if4KG
r *, f(M1\rr)( O) 8, ((>f 7WIf L - G A lf ILitutt fi f J 6f tf(t<15 l a ff. 3. 0 . 2 GnMD
u
c7 tat he et ta Vu aws ortan s.o42- 4 10 . i. L, savho 7 hit s w es e s i k w r'
tt ur.:,wnin en,
DATA SHf ( T 2 b](Q) = l!ID)f ATI?> VPS EIW 70 H(, I, l r W *> bT
Tf f,f ruN AL /1653 /)/}54 BV7 AG TUhL f( FrtilH AL tNfAtf 4 00 N67 A /el(~ .
l
l
l
_
.
' PAGE NO.: h - '/k ") . l
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4W/f-3J
I
- - - - - - - , - . . - - _ . - -
_- . - - _ _ , - , - -_ _ _ _ _ . - . _ _ _ . _ - - - _ _ _ - . . , . - -
. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ ._ . _ _ . _ ._
t
-
.
Q
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4.10.4.1 PAGE NO.: 34 10-4 l
TS REQUIREMENT: 'Tu6 Tirv1f DuplNr. tAMia! TH( Apo# sfyf) fire MGplRgil(N7
'
!
HnG Pt+rJ SGWLHDEO 91hLL Pf- t(R\fl[D 70 Pf L{M 7Hnd 2A HOQR$ !
'
AT LfA67 fWft$ fYR H0UR DURlrJC FHY<lCS Tf 675 [ J(f: / ONNUATioN 6Hf67)
LIC PROCEDURE N0.: STP oS3 o70l ISSUE DATE: l.0 7 '/F REV.: o y;
TITLE: Rfncrd fresprotnTontI InnPs Afffeiers tv>(b e st; Tr; < Tortt. ,
*
YES N0
1.Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 ra A tlA
lLis installed system consistent with TS7 uA rJA .
^
3.Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)? l
4 Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
l
5.Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should NA eiA
work as written?
l..Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? / i
REMARKS: $S0Mnu tmer Go const snni', mhu surou P n w ten esT For " A ,
a tmo t strosin erren w re niate titurwntti oop: \r,tb uM,1we or wr twt
titter pflH $1(f( ts (H ireJ1 nonb Ji n sitt 's f ro /\ ft strof( 'u w rulf (1i r e.tr $ *rt e,7
of Cin FT \lP TY 61 ff0!f 0VHf .
(* 0 S T P GirF5 *1 A 1.5 h*to '7 b ra i f.t llie httb ))ndl0 nf Jf R ff sul1 lu
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT 8Y WHEN7 *
.ity G) NAL Resuvale $s heilenol
Sto & Ltumo m alt k fvei IesJ
%V
'
'
i
INSPECTOR (S): L/iM b /). {/sem4trlaAs :
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ;
YES g
Were problems corrected? .,
'
Were any other problems identified?
.
,
STATUS Of ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
IN5PECTION. REPORT 50-458/ 75-73 PAGE NO.: A DF
)
,
O
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA C0tilitiUA710t, SHEET
TS PARA: 4.L O 4.} PAGE NO.: 34.IO-4
,
AND Tlh! .9TA R70P TFST f)ROGR/lto.
91 anry '. : hota sua10) I, a t colhTl D TnM ? 24 lhJRG Duf To Clon!
IJ ' tM 1 Ori r it 'M ChY,
.
,
' PAGE NO. . hd/A't
INSPECT 10N REPORT 50-45 W FJ- li
_ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ -
. - - - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ ._ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _
.
..
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
T$ PARA: 4,164.2 PAGE NO.: 3/4 10- 4
T5 REQUIREMENT: THfRrML POW 6R 6HAtL PF nt fERMINFD 70 86
LF6$ Tnnd G% (V RnTED THERrAnL POWER AT 1FnRT CH(f
PFR ll0GR CURING PH Y61f ', TG A TS,
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: STP-Fo7-370j ISSUE DATE: 3-G-Z6 REV.: O
TITLE: THrAroot fw y u,ait c@iril, pHyr, irs Tr$7,rq(,
*
YES N0
J.!s there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 NA NA
2.Is installed system consistent with TS7 A 1
3.Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
4Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / *
5.Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
6.Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: 4. PlI( F( w ( 2,2 (M N M toy v1h1 e ntl\tt ef: t v, tr O_ (WL nTI li" .
F If per nr (foriDWr * Tn T( 0
.
Th >)( ? tf Y TillPent\L (Mkf t(ss raAr4
og (:tyInl. Tn ti V of G A T( O 1M(ftMI (M)(P Puf 76 f(hthM tl1(d7
57670 5 If GS TH/Ir4 7 'Z O t> L Y ,
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7
y( A. Ll t ( N f,( F P( f Crit lLC. F96((Ot)ff (W ( Uf L Loh'D
INSPECTOR (S): DiCl6HT D. (lln t#/ A i / lts/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION P.EPORT 50-458/
YES $
Were problems corrected? .
Were any other problems identified?
i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 2 5 - 8 PAGE NO.: . A-410
- ----- ----- --- - --- ------_- -- ---_ _ _ -_
'
l
'
t
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4.10.6 PAGE NO.: 3/4 10-6
TS REQUIREMENT: THE Rf A(70R V6'55f L Alott 86 t/6 RIFl60 70 86
UHPRFS<URIPFD nNO THf YdFRmnL 96WER nND RGn(TcR (ftU1NT
Tfr/IPfRATUFF 5HAtl 86 VFRlFlf-o [ fr6 rew TINVATION Fdff f 7)
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STP 507 '47f)2 ISSUE DATE: 2 27-25 REY.: _o m
TITLE: TH(RtnAL PolrR p ht TnH c6nt oni Ti ro P(Y(m)P( fnD 9(lv i9 lle'f l. Ff(SMR(.
*
VIKifif6714ti DVRfrir, T//mHH(e 57f4T Vf5 y[$ g
1.!s there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 NA No
2 is installed system consistent with TS? NA HA ,
3.Are there any problems with the TS (factual or /
editorial)?
4.Does procedure carry out TS requirermnt? / *
5.Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should t/
work as written?
6.Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? /
REMARKS: @9)F')r H t l'ntt 9t t>I+v rni ritt. Olouto !ntLODf F(t>vner en(H T TOR
"A f f f or10 !It(n!(0 69f3n T09 ?P OTut P T(chi!!nlL4 t]vhLlr !( 0 ft(rMff et*
Tilf 9Hl7 7tt!iNi AL t
f TAf f 85 PR/ S(Nf AND $1(fir'/6 (9Af t triner e rri tro4n,;6
-
(1l.91 off 9torF DURE $."
D r.T(P 1!, Nt r O Tn (f roni- HM To nR1Alth THrporinL (%)(8
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? '
313, @ NRf 6/ / fgr it /
_
BY Ft)f t LohD
3t} G) t.lU nset Prtenfor A1 (Ull f.nAo
INSPECTOR (S): DWl(.HT D. /'ll/1/MrAl.AIrl
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50 458/
YES 300
.
Were problems corrected?
t
Were any other problems ider.tified?
STATUS Or ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS: ,
'
INSPECTOR (5):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ M - U PAGE NO. A-W/ (
.
O
TECliNICAL SPEClflCATION DATA Cut 11t.UA110?, Risi
TS PARA: 4 [0. II PAGE NO.: 3/710-8
To Bt tillTillM THE l.lmlT6 I)T l.( h 6T CH(V PFR
}}0VR DURING TR AININC STA RT VPS.
'>it 9 7. b - Uq 1E W KG74 RCmun it 1
n tn r F 6 * ['n Iaml(fQ
FWL H 13 ~ l'bs4
C y t> 'f, 9 rit i o in t t t t_a r t,1{. Wer f f 1, 88 fttra f f(,(Inn r >>l(tti7 TvofFffblvtt
:, f t Y /,3 - tis art ', TR tit ()t tJ 1 tl\)tritW R b2l N(6'd ik T fit NI L. ti 13 j)(,80
. . .
'
. . . .
.
6-
O
'
INSPECTION REPORT 50-4W/Jf-JJ PAGE h0.: J "Y W
< _
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ .
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
15 PARA: SM/ //,1 PAGE NO.: T/t/ //-/ t Td4/t '/.//././ /
TS REQUIREMENT: ksde'. mea'e/,Lu,'/ Lar/, L s/w; ,_/ " @ * N I/ ' l
' '
b relYhi fruen d
0
REY.: O
LIC PROCEDURE NO.: S rp-coo-7 eat $$UE DATE: t /v/s,-
'
TITLE: Te A wi[a / 5sn'.Ncali , Su rs et /Ed c'at d eu,<',// /4 4. N ib(
'
' *
Qvss 4ES '@
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 D M #0/ Tgc,P
is installed system consistent with TS7
ArethereanyproblemswiththeTS(factualor
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should e
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? v
REMARKS: T$n b racads* * % , T T P' s.o -9en b , afv s'dh&> M rS _
thwb4N
'
f- M 'ur' w w o a lt.rtt b an w N s> fev Is s We.
_ f A 'r _ d l e /s f r el J ( % 1 Y a , ff <~f/f4C su# o3) ,
-
STATUS Of ITEM $3
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7
CLOSED ,
'
J' 2.,Le et tt j
& d AkN%acedu< <E>S s c'nowi*l N V+ w Arev .
b4 lw D,'r ?n'fud W C. ' /b Pr'M to' N habe ik 1, Arnq dJ
h/r W5 wb t 'fA #f$r m (l & ' Wr u A" t/ a s sua M/v il t/srsw*v' s e
INSPECTOR (S):(//[/fe I Ndt /
' '
/ "*'81
~ "" r,'
'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPEfibN kEPORT/50-458/_
YES &
.
Were prob 1 cms corrected?
S
'
Were any other problems identificdi
STATUS Or 1 TEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
!
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ T h If PAGE NO.: 4-913
l
_ . . . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
,
,
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: Y.1/. ( PAGE NO.: 3 /y 4-/
4ere v <<e n o se leaset .@fra<<Jsn sTt -o00 -9000
4as n6t o.,Fu tke Iowe<- limit *F *! desh% (u o)
as efedR*A 6 TS. Then LLD s huy be in %e
refere<<< Chesa y % ,w 15..ar frae h . U tensae
IM W5 Y .syttify
, ,
lA-A y tr' .
$*
.
.
.
.
INSPECTION REPORT 50 451/ 3i 7 5 PAGE NO A ll'/__
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __________ _____ -___ _
l
'
* TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
15 PARA: t/. //. / PAGE NO.: "JQ //-/ f '744/C M//. / /"I
15 REQUIREMENT: #r,JIo#</*t< Z.'su.'/ A/di/e S k ~ A * **/ * /'I* ' Y Y #
'
A un lvrr's baI ne--
I
l
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:s7P-ooe.fa. ISSUE DATE: / / u / f- ( REY.: b l
TITLE: %dwlnf 5de e ofr'ced ',r S uverktG 'n C 4 n ,'u / / A W A - lc , /
'
'
l NO
hoyrw YES ;
I
1s there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 g #t,f g eef '
!s installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? *
l
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should .
1
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? ,r l
REMARKS: Parrdu v4 S TP -ene - vood cloer we/ /dfeas/a /. Medveag
3mds 's furwed s 4 a univeri G otu n tv . Th Fw . .~ es ,5, r *
U
c T O o$o . sso n s n'.1/ n-rfstlo so bn k L' d ,V /d l J '
+ J . tu . : "4,.:.u. I,,M ,,,,n w u.t.7tA esi.fi ?g v. '
'Did 4 ' diso e #f A N P -o o *r n il',{d b r efore',4 4. Kot t~ 1, L,y gre.o...n. ;
#
STATUS Of ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN7
tat 'sdo d N & 2" ct/ csd /fa e tw I $6'% *~ cv .r.t f b e_
31S s 4 4 J '< rd& C. /sd ca r< . 'S t:a 6L do,tu. aur,<. ~
he <~.a.h / 'u d smos d I. ,La n/T '
INSPECTOR (S).d?/A,d M W#t
!
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPE/TIEREIORT 50-M8/ ; .
YES ,N_0
Were problems corrected?
.
i l
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS Of ITEM
REMARKS: _
'
l
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/_ 2 5 -35 _ PAGE NO.: d' '/ M
i
l
_
__ _
___ __.
_ _ _ _ . . _ _ ..
_ _ _ _ - ___
------ - _ - -_
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIf! CATION REVIEW OATA SHEET
TS PARA: V. //. / 'L PAGE NO.: ~3/V // '/'
TS REQUIREMENT: ( ~ ./,A ',c& u G,.6,'L4 '-i h[ 1$h .#/ -/, & c a <4 Y 94-
s e m + y n a. n .ta r a ,,: <<ce x a . n 5 h e n .y t<,, i ~. p . ,i s,, .
LIC, PROCEDURE NO.: trp-s // -soo(,lSSUE DATE: I L/dt'/tY REV.: 0
/,1 ,'/ (/e' vef,'c4 V,,'
'
~
TITLE: A ro ,'e/ h /ae s-, (eh em f r.4 ' *
# YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 g/ * ( .bfe/ '
15 installed syttem consistent with TS7
ArethereanyproblemswiththeTS(factualor
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? v
'
Dm; the procedure walkdown indicate that it should #A-
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? M
REMARKS: 1/uc<svr. ro <*rA4./ v'eeMe& cm e -/ o lo/r e" // ,/
dr( > h $ 2. A / /o VA('e ore I
ce edw e .
(
'
l
STATUS Of ITEM @
TOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT_BY WHEN7
CLOSED
'
N ' N ew /t v v " M *4 t f $ t to Ytd W E,'t r e vo r sat l 0 'ins.,'
3y I '
br $o< e 6l.
INSPECTOR (S): Old 8e_ '
.M(o
FOLLOWUP ACTION: 'INSPECTidrIREPORT50/58/_
f~
YES NO
.
Were problems corrected?
-
Were any other problems' identified?
STATUS Of ITEM OPEN CLOSE0
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: h '/ J t, _
INSPECTION REPORT 50 458/ PT-U _
,I
- - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ - _ _ _ - - - - _ , . -
- - __ -_
.
*
TECHNICAL SPEClf! CATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
1
15 PARA: T //. /. 7 PAGE NO.: 7/'/ // - i~
TS REQUIREMENT: ToSe< c[64 4 S /[4[ . / rdte fer N userer/p,c.kc/oern f
'
sfrat/Le wa),aJed af frorf ~aa as a t da a e as s e r o e dvs.,
/ ,4 H, % l%dola s v <h 4 a s &> - j'a r n' hl Ohcm
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: SrP -Yu-nnyl55UE DATE: n/,6 / s r REV.: o
TITLE:%dsc/s'. J ' bort (,.m l. "i V '# e[/.# , u r f a. o _. A , 4 / A 3 *
.
*
' vtS g l
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? g ,{ f d .7 u rg '
eef l
f
Is installed system consistent with 757 ,
ArethereanyproblemswiththeTS(factualor I
editorial)?,fp,,,./,
Does procedure 3 carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should pfp
work as written?
4/4
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? ,la w' A*/Ar'r' s
,
REMARKS: FC Jit trSee e~r d' 4a ,..ese G r
t-/nto of,
a v e. t u v e a_ + , At% -U?> '1 ts tw
-_
STATUS Of ITEM (0NN) ,
FOR "0 PENS" WHO MUST 00 WHAr$Y WHEN7
ult ni tty notksyt e gneit r ? L.stTEN's ,,
M7 . /
'
= . .
-l
INSPLCTOR(5): 9/d., 6L. M8(t. ~
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECf!EN REf0R150/458/.
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? o
Or[N CLOSED
STATUS Of ITEM
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO : 4 8m 7
INSPECTION REPORT 50 458/ 75-J f
1
,
'
_
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4. //. /, '/ PAGE NO.: 7/9"//-(o '
TS REQUIREMENT: 7
4 a usf. h a b ra bu,L' u ,4,.,1 ( @ ec( ,; u , ,,A e h d
Od).o L ks fl.5e/ L droe l'o,c/s.L; W + af,(s.ta el ,e n k $ g ,)
(IC. PROCEDURE NO.: vp - 91( - ESUEDATE: REV.:
-TITLE:
I -
'
YES g
5
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? P 8 4 [ 2n rA c7
f
Is installed system consistent with TS?
re there any problems with the TS (factual or
-
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
,Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? ,,
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST n0 WHAT BY WHEN?
,. : 3' :--
31W llcehtee knus& Ikroe a,c, prove)y sua($ced bn-n fr&&t. _
- / /) ,
INSPECTOR (S): //[2, k0 bN
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPEO N REPORT 56-458/ . _
YES g
Were problems corrected?
'
i
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PS -35 PAGE NO.: 4 -Y3P
..
.
.
TECHNICAL _ SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y, //,2. /. I PAGE NO.: 1/a //- 7
TS REQUIREMENT:
b 4 r m b clo w r , / t cde d //G < 3 d ,areo,5 4['[/% /r
-]c do a ,W E Iw A o f ~5 . I t. 2 , I d a n e u .le , a w,k 'n bcg
.
LIC.. PROCEDURE NO.: STP-coo-teo ISSUE DATE: /[#P 5 REV.: O
TITLE: 'fEeCo.,kJ e.f*iafLe %ru<llIM c.k
*
< / b de J o , 4 ( )f.. ,,.
YES N_0
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? _97/ / d f h //r /
' '
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
#
Has . licensee completed procedure walkdown?
frec M+c .c. 5 FF
2
REMARKS: -/d We4
-
c,,,.r c % e4
%'c(.R esa f%oca d .-t S W - oco - see o lo < 7' 2 t,f it, z , 7, ,
"L 4 ll rh es me /rr4x+< d do fr w 6iv4%.
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR ."0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WH BY WHEN? * -
>
.
r _ _ - -
:- _ .
3Yf LiteNh h ostos h 1?stve_ sh,. wilead Yew,, p/aalver _
_
. A
INSPECTOR (S): [ /#[A. d [ M d -
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INbPECf[0N REPORT [ 458/ L _ y
YES N_0
Were problems corrected?
i i
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/ M - 35
PAGE N0.: A 8f 3 9
I
.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y. //. L. /. / PAGE NO.: '3/c/ //- 7
_ h / w e E d o s-c vw k c[ , ' 4 # 6
T 's- ,,,' o <5vou .5 e aC eC/44
TS REQUIREMENT:
-/o L t. <M L - ( lw. */c o S 's. (f. 2. / & a c c ou do._ r, o .N 'n<. ObCm
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 5 T F -goc. -h2 toISSUE DATE: /1/As.-/sV REV.: O
TITLE: Y6llt Gos + / & fi % /atr4 Ee f8 5 s' /s Dos-e6 ado47rNm%\
'
YES g f
p;d 4'of .Dussed ;
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? #
Is installed system consistent with TS?
i
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
;
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should ,
work as written?
,r #
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
N/'o / o b M e A cer a n e da d 7% '2_a h,-r '.
REMARKS:
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN? '
$ /Wd ewe $ d9ak heSo<e CL,
40 Tehvs/ssiaebh4 Cems/e /
lecI <e /
_
/ n
INSPECTOR (S): YA2[L.[ '
MIL .
FOLLOWUP ACTION: NSPdbTIONREPO[50-458/J
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
WereanyotherproblemsidentIfied?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ff-7f PAGE NO.: 4 -Yvo
-l
_ _ .
i
'
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M //. 2. /. L Q R) PAGE NO.: Q/c/ //- 7
TS REQUIREMENT: Oh/aw'c(s-cen4,cbe 6 I. ' ,'# Ye# M d ag, S.,/,/e
dyn u :M H '> V ha, e uree-r SIA'Is + chlei h R h Le c,Wi r3 l
*
L 0 b c M 4 TT & V,//.2./.2 - I
3.tl2.lllm.h a r en L'.
/2 /zdr-y REV. :
!
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: O -co6-fo/o ISSUE DATE: o
TITLE: JVoje (Eas $llddsfale GY1C lur h Dto3 'falt 1).ef&>,,',wf$
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7 d,'/ g. / E rg e< f
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
<f
work as written?
/ '
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? A/}-
REMARKS: 4[o[ o[ wedc[ n4&dece e a r# e e/, 4M
"l a ft v s ' '
;
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
YOI ' Ubys "m.s rf be desa,sb kc/ 4We'r re em l <r a 'hE .e &a
/ /
-
INSPECTOR (S): 2/.4IL, M/# -
~
-
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPEdTIONREPORT50-458/.
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
*
' Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S): _
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ c75-35 PAGE NO.: A-VY/
I
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 6 Ile1.1 PAGE NO.: 3 /y II -//
TS REQUIREMENT:
Cumvlcfive dare contr%v&A1r fu,. de current celee/ar-
avarier m) current ye<< for Mrk hil be dekiahd ,s ucerkar wif4 At med JJosy
ad enremetras b (e 00CM n+ $6&one yer 3 Ihfs
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: Sff -000-#0lf ISSUE DATE: l&/,yh y REV.: O
TITLE:
'
YES NO
-
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 0T4 ndf I4crecI
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? Y
REMARKS: &k lef Uf -lie- het)esk bredtt1 dit. Mlt +o " LATFx s
&Ts % Il1.1 s% -W+ com eMrJ olose cAbk+1ks .s kll 6 e me
oe r he C 0CM <f less t~ onet ru 1i L<. Te&M I,) of srecek
'
'
'
't fxfes ak<wne.
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? '
Yok ' (T) LMe m es+- ly u royak "LA'Tur
yo (9 Ltwree en ust reso'Ive TS/prowclare enFint
INSPECTOR (S): M/*s Ic & Le ## llV
' '
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES 3
Were problems corrected? .
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff- 35 PAGE NO.: Ar-Y Y L
!
I
.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
M. /d 2. L- PAGE NO.: "7/q //-//
TS PARA:
TS REQUIREMENT: ( as,a/4 M c/o w cw 4,L h, b fo- z4 c* re o / C4 4 /..-
vd < // 4 e. bltnso,5 eln' a c con Lu_ c,, & ,4 q
}lv,%-ru wA} yr. S v FG't,
. gr M nh(on4 Atvn Avr w' d (Obt M J/ serb n c e de- 3/ clovf. '
'
LIC. PR0fEDURE NO.:STP-Gott2.I2, ISSUE DATE: it//Y/N REV.: o
TITLE: pl%4 Ga3 4 /l,6cl/,4 Comme 4 2bh hhrd4M . ,
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 7),',[ //o[ Srpe c.f
'
I
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written? ,,
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? 44
REMARKS: A lo f e b b m cfr[e / r e h r o c ,e ar# 3r, 4 .,4, f4 b b 3
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
% sfelec/ + f/iri froctcNALisevle d 49a y /,a/m
Yo] 'E b e s n o e / d e_ '
I
OL, _
INSPECTOR (S): 9//&,8A DfA, -
' '
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECd10N REPORT [-458/ y _ _ -
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
Wereanyotherproblemsident$fied?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 76-3f PAGE NO.: k-413
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M r/ 2. 3 PAGE NO.: 7/cr //- / 2-
TS REQUIREMENT: Cuw/4 41 o/ea % $ 2/4 r -/o ' M, e. e.,-/ u /4 4- a 6,4- c- -Af
c alA.de vr. -[-e YW W 4 &03 n GwWAW1 & W7s r > P4 ys
o t r odu cs u r k' O b C N < fl+rf$c e f .h4p
' '
c6a//de cklem5e5
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 3T/2-ooo-Eorr ISSUE DATE:
i x/N/s .,r REV.: o
TITLE: Cu w /,4 4. h Cm-A l b 9 m 4.L .V % .4 6or#oc (-ff/%-/r
'
# YES 0
_N_0 2k/er,g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? OM /Vof .Es c.f
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should p
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? g
REMARKS: A (d ah th moo dcd nobn er e E we ca 4 a 5 r p-uoo-fotS~
n u .e r do &M ~ 2 a t& r '
,
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
A N S U sar S cn , A r4 d P~oo" +- 7% i
Y$
yna& h a 4 L ~; D ,,
,
u m oc _
INSPECTOR (S): ,/4, / Ay d , b
-- ,/ -
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ _
YES NO
Were problems corrected? i
i
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
!
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-3f
PAGE NO.: #1'/</
y
l
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y,//.0.3 PAGE NO.: 3/Y /I"'A
TS REQUIREMENT: C m /d l alm em /r kG, 4.,- f. cuya,f c4/, 4. 4 ceN cggd
-
wn E 'N , 'AE . 'N. + vocl4sec$b d ss.he 4/c 4e - w<Yt' /ra/C I hr e refu Mr p \
Sa,, At/4,d/re .I 14 sus &_e . & EG s,dtsLAw ser.6s < SObOr s/feif wc<
'
I
LIC PROCEDURE NO. :p79 4&-Pt/t. ISSUE DATE: /thv/s[ REV.: o F W r.y
TITLE: /V6 t( /evM * /4 ,#<. G u, /e / d b d M w d . M !
g
'
YES
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? D;d po/ fqpe.~f
Is installed system consistent with TS?
!
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? g/f.
REMARKS: 4-/d e,[ 76
M e/e/ n:[-t A cer av w d -d M 2 ,,4.-3
l
!
STATUS OF ITEM O CLOSED
! FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
40p 1brs a rf Sg % s ip /N r l 'f- Y W lr n c e L v e
'
M Nr bo k
te0ter $$ro -
Sov.e bL. _
-
- A , , .
INSPECTOR (S): h/da[Ld M '
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPENION REPORT 8 50-458/ 'TCe : '
YES _N0
Were problems corrected?
i e
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
l
l REMARKS:
!
l INSPECTOR (S):
I INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 85-3f PAGE NO.: h-YYs
'l
!
I
l
. . ... -- _ _ _ _ _ - _ _- .. --_ - .
_
.
! -
- .
i
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'
TS PARA: 4 //. 2 Y PAGENO.: q/v // - / 3
TS REQUIREMENT: 7Me = d u A /r .reecdE G % ddC#f r6//4.e c&h /e.,c y -
12. Jew i & n l4 % m' Cavt/m s'r. m 'eiee/a is4. omowL' A eacu .e M,/ g4
l G<soa-n Wdwah %S4 Wf Cu s ] 5 $'sk a L c %' .
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: _rn? -oo . w!SSUE DATE: // o v/s-y REV.: o
'
'
'
TITLE: 'IL, /v
'
rberwbE
_/ /
/ se r
/ / -
YES N_0,0
- Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? D/(p.f L/ep
Is installed system consistent with TS? p
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or V [b.
editorial)? d 'E ' ' 'b N 'b"f *' "
!
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? 7
'
'
l Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
- work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? -
REMARKS: Is h e e.- a e Itc/. t /-/f 6 4 /-(, 7 g s TP o.o -oo/ aw ,
' STATUS OF ITEM OPEN (CLh
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
'
Voh ' 72fn
/
hu&.e n %. O.
!
l n > n
INSPECTOR (S): ' M5 M/
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECT /dNREPORT50#458/ k f-Y
YES N_0
Were problems corrected? :
Were any other problems identified? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
' INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ PAGE NO.: &-8/Y6
_ _ _
_ - _ _ -
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M //. 2. ( PAGE NO.: 7/+8 //-/y
TS REQUIREMENT:
'7 h c.e e clu < -As u reo- r e c./co 1, e fenMe r,h c44// 6t
*
yro;eeFed af ls ef osc< fee 3!deya iL ace.eduea o,H the we Modatoyy
'
and Sara we fer s t? Me Oh c M .
LIC. ' PROCEDURE NO.: 97r <,4o 3 -P2/pSSUE DATE: /2/2 e/p v REY.: o
TITLE: '
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
I
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: L svo c.e k v.e STP-40')- v '114 tha Ob c M a 's wlv me d al
s.' &
Puaae o;in, th c 11 - u .s w fe - , ' , *"Ts nf c x -rL ', Ac e cola> -<
'
.
c l,s. k svo- v a . tv4 d ZW 'f bdkN , l Wo (re. '
\ 7 4/!< K. /S ?ry'wI= d < r
v.113. C / M M N as' 'Y. t/. z. 5 ^
STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY 5 HEN 7
Wolf6 d3t C m&lx & s o V<.'
9? @Sooe.L
. % <%Li 1% J ddroc_e
a b c *1.c(we.d,r n <f de ccm ,x' r4 ./rcf 4e L O L, .
[99@faseptpa,/ksysveJ
INSPECTOR (S): b /d a k I M 01-v
'
INSPE[TIONREPORT[0-458/- f~~
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
YES &
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
1
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/ 95-3r
PAGE NO.: N4 '/7
I
t ,
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 8/. II. J. 6 PAGE NO.: 3/v frw
TS REQUIREMENT: ~71e coaccafyd/m of ik, in fle mt,, condenser effear bked sysbi Al/
be elek1.s) 40 se wundelis;h vf Llo. 3.II.2.6 by to.%o ny me.ha,' +1,r weJe pm 1, ne .,+
'
ca.Jesns. *ff us +ad"* %sk w4stse- k met <ce. des evuok. stdr~ a t< emWen wth 16 no,iks
LIC. PROCEDURE N0. : str-ow-cool ISSUE DATE: Phy/ry REV.: 0
TITLE: Odily Opered3 4,J .
YES N
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? Olid.Nir8d
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or q/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? / '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should /
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: 6) fehavain 34 clarf A/64-ft(,os ir Irsk) abewelv4 as IN GY-4 6tf
D Ts skoviales itas He mars <Anse, off.al +ve Inca sysk msHe h
oyteke . fryse)ver ialMks Lt Ar *nk cedensea sie eledw Itiseversitan,
&c ht fle use r ?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN? .
- 1 01 G LInnset wh crueNf acek
l ytp @ wessu. ~,t delera re if a.-f5//wsedare cmFlax+ arnh ed
l re solve co,.Ftid %! os.n W rotsi.
l INSPECTOR (S): Wt3 lev Le #v/lfy
'
f FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES NO
Were problems corrected? .
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
I REMARKS:
!
INSPECTOR (S):
l
i INSPECfl0N REPORT 50-458/ FS-35 PAGE N0.: k '/Y#
.i
i
t
_____. _ - - _ _ _ _ _.. .. _ _ _ . __ . __ _ _ _ _ .- _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _
J
.
.
1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'
TS PARA: 6 //.2.7.l PAGE NO.: '3/4 //'/l.
TS REQUIREMENT: 74.e_ r e C[/o a c / $/,/ v ~ / t .6 h 44 ,eres er,o', 4 g
'
- kolaf us a,lo s$a (/ />g % / hysuj{y ml./,,.ed s e hda ,e4
'
W $ E N '3.'3.2.//.
1
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: WF-ooo-ooor ISSUE DATE: "
F.1Y[/9
'
REV.: o
TITLE: 1 /v /O w a-/*wh /oe t
' ' ' '
'l YES JLO
l' Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 9,'/ /o T.< spcf
,
! Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
- editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? #
,
'
#
! Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
- work as written?
! Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? V
5 h 7.:, cluf wee,wcl.n ./.br2-MG 0*/,.$ w -h.a'un,
'
REMARKS: - -
I
l
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS" WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
@ CLOSED
0 The T3 g {r {A kt W g j y n * & c( % y-o, O-f $ e &s/
yff < o-lK e_n d Y k % A w J J k r P oa.-as.1 O *c-a 4 r # <f % .ss '
ds L sn 46 & cle>-adnn & .An M d we? h mr % <dc4
INSPECTOR (S): M d M9
'
h/ ' 0/ .
~
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPEQ/IONREPORT5[-458/ ~
YES NO
:
Were problems corrected?
i
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff- fJ PAGE N0.: kW'M
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECITICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: #/. //,2. 7. / 4 PAGE NO.: "JN #-No
TS REQUIREMENT:;6 re/us4 r,4 4 /4 ru 4 f4 ad.LV,'/, 4 /2, va , w e. ru,., / ew.;. f. fc Afc
,, y l g,@
ugh , Lit L d.oleniJ 4. 4, y,& +LA llu.% O 'r$ 9. d. t 7 UV V her. $%j n N ,
' g g oc 1, A +v L L . J > fo 2; ath- L&n'a J un vo-ur d.. A Qu Mov,.o!.w ,- in ,rr m. ,g ,L q
REV.: fd4
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:5 7p m.. - foe. ISSULDATE:j4/se <dao. %p,
TITLE: QL ,.r.1 TA,LL AL., % alitsa e n a .,W L J h L . lc A /<o, m n ay c.. y
YES -
NO
4r #1'NY'h"Ir5
/,4A
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 'b /e/ 446 GrM p Ag A.Nyg
is installed system consistent with TS? o y pof y-
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or pr4 #of h ysi;/-
editorial)?
7
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should g
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? pjr
REMARKS: Prouofa, .e FTP -coo - +oa e eho ,. m, / o //ro u Ml, T5 ihm ,
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
16,; senc_ a Jn << . vs-e-coa soos . c< we r- n oe.e or<< e !- s,< a -+
M ! c ll e e fS We//:*2. 7. I br *+- A ,.
s,. ,
err ed Smed-< DL, -
n / n ~
INSPECTOR (S): Mla[LI /d[[L
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSP[CTIONREPOR[50-458/. .._"
.
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
' Were any other problems identifiec'?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
1
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: s4-- YJo
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 85-7f_
1
__ - --_ _ ._. - .
._, - - _ _ _ _ . _
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M//2'7.2 A PAGE NO.: 1 / 4 //-/ 6
TS REQUIREMENT: 74 e e/ms red J M reu,. e6 E a J.,.*y$1r .f.~ K A's , wea,,ccr s ./ 6, u.a.
i
' hN V v.io< rh.t/ La eleh+ uirl 4. be n. L ' 1 4 J n s.it.1 > af less / na , ,n siday e j y
pa.~ n . ; n,a . r..:. .c . <yni.c r.,n .+ ,,e., u.f :. +. m s.u.,. ,;. ,. .
,
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 5 T/s-ooo -yeo3 ISSUE DATE: e/y// r- REV.: 0
*
'
TITLE: 'fEcAnac. / %, se NLs ,JJ r .%ve: tin u ' c la m ck /,/ 6 J lc h ,,eJ n . p s
.
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? P N /t M E w ey
Is installed system consistent with TS? M Ay c 3y'g
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or JL/ po npec f- ,
-
editorial)? yproe fa
Does procedure3 carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should p'4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? p'/r
REMARKSh6asela rTP -e n o - m d oes wo1' s ee c.2 #d w
r, E k
boaw
. R . u s a ~ . 1 , n :. c a 4 a , a u n,s 4 .'.-./n /c2. ,. s
,, L r'a.a cmr,, on;A r 6.... .,
'
.\ : c Lu+ L '~.a.,
i
c. s' P - an i M. l's P- o!W eke s exlr+ C G * v 's tolzr/hv} ;
STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
l
4l) hCacovv r E. 'MAMit K 5 o Sox su r / be o /duesteel 'ad us "ae. eo ung
e woma u nc, ~
y 0 @ 'L're.oce ms3 6W _ Cs r -D r.7 y
INSPECTOR (S): /4[/,jf <[ M- .-
,
r- iv
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPETIONREP0kT50-458/4
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
'
Wer'e any other problems identified? .,
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM t
REMARKS:
"
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Pf d.I PAGE NO.: A- *(SI
- 1
.- -- - - _
__ - - _ . .
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: M //, f , 6 PAGE NO.: 7/V // 7 7
,
TS REQUIREMENT: Du r ? 16 ws,/: -Ja M . f fAr PC P . <Y > L.-l J so N/< w,4.; dr.1/ f:t
4 c.& L'4 hr M e4 N 1/
-
-
U u El ww fd $ .L.9 6/ r,,aec Ls L. nl. l.%4.] ,.g s
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:frf-6ew -77o, ISSUE DATE:
y
. REV.:
/
,
J^A
4 ,,e, . 4
TITLE: ,
'
YES NO W ,,,, f h g
'
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? d
REMARKS: i. .
-
Um_-e - ,c~=~
. - h
fradn ka ,w+ hee,, nsa A .
STATUS OF ITEM CLdSED
FOR "0 PENS", WM MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
_ '
4Lb SoutL.e nwd 6 g sno,,e d b.eSev.r OL .
// -
n / n
INSPECTOR (S): YM ( MM
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECdI~0NREPORT50-458/F-c
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
'
i
Were any other problems identifiec'?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A - V.q
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ M-3(
!! .
- - - - - . . - - . . - - - - - . - A
__
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 //,1. k PAGE NO.: '7//-/ //- / 7
TS REQUIREMENT:
P G F v4,///c.uscel /. e84 NAM s yNnd /rfm4,(; M,g,a/oM
ho/d J eaJ4 m J wef ro4-*th . 6 9 N M spd.n 4,.% 7el,Jd h( * -M n G UloQyQ
N d ss O..C r,t,Er,:,,C
u.JY d G LJ E.1 wa:- ,a !.a U,.L.i
.
'
LIC.PRbCEDURENd.: 3 rp -foot / -77ojSSUE DATE: ?' REV.: ,7
TITLE: ? '
YES g D,y po/f -f
^ -
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS: fVocedcva w$ kvl4% .
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
hoc.rtb^t<- ">vtd h be_ 77 n,$dVaved Y vt 00<
\ Mlf -
t
I
f INSPECTOR (S): 7/M M [2
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTIONREPORTM-458/'-
YES g
Were problems corrected?
,
i
Were any other problems identified?
OPEN CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
PAGE NO.: A- 't 5 7
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS-35
._ __
- _ _ .
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: t/. //m e/ / PAGE NO.: 7/u //-/V
TS REQUIREMENT: ch.,/a/d cleta cm /,..% A', h kb // y-p,fre r oof//"A /t 5 4< //
k odi k m an,' ret x % r,~ K ,, L '4 T'S 4,it. / -/ , V, it t f V- < b /,2 , q, + p a O y
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:grr>,mo-potrISSUE DATE: /34V/h/ REV.: o
TITLE: CR w // b Tke.s k b.OMe -C 21,*,/ m J Cw;v.*1 E#/.Afr
'
#
YES g D4 MN k,
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? P,i/ po / S epe p
Is installed system consistent with TS? l
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? * '
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? , ,,
REMARKS: A-/. / -f f4 nee edt/ rerb. Acar 'a' wo crh p rr-c oo - gory-
n.r m c/ _ J g M 'Ea h s
'
STATUS OF ITEM h
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
ylf'Zadeo-s a' SYr'-coo - fo r r 1 stas! 6e rmfedel ^ d -fk ; noa e/ur <
' '
h% < e A*w e d' ins : A,La OL,
s
-
l
INSPECTOR (S): % $cSL, d NG/[L
~
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPEdTI0NIEPORT[0-458/ ,' ~
,
YES $
l Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems ident'ifiec'? i
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
l INSPECTOR (S):
'
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-3f PAGE NO.: A -YJY
k
_ _ ___ A
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y.//, V. Z PAGE NO.: 7/4 //-/ p
TS REQUIREMENT:Cu m /, M d u c d r 1 L ,.f- % c/J.,3m d h x A -y M ,
ny .fede / o .clet A.- , s Kh 41/ 6 drkmded yo,- nen m . Ai a aprMf
4 u) , ca tft em {v tt., de en d,% r .re f R eK n ' 'fT 4./A*/_ gd4 a.
LIC.' PROCEDURE Nb. :.y-r-p-ooo 4erc, ISSUE DATE: 7 REV.: ?
TITLE: T
'
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? p,,/ g/o f- A d
Is installed system consistent with TS? l
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? ,,
*
, _ r oz, d
REMARKS: d, - ,m.o e ecleue e/s e no / /eu
*
e,
)
STATUS OF ITEM OP'EN' CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHG MUST D0 WHA WHEN?
tll9
A4m al n antv0Wel($ l,bevi .c TS L/.tf.U.t bha OL. .
~
/
I
{{ /\
INSPECTOR (S): ]pd,fn I Md_
i FOLLOWUP ACTION: INS [CTIONREP0d50-458/i_ _ i
YES &
Were problems corrected?
'
Were any other problems identifiec'?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FT-35 PAGE NO.: /t '/fr
!
.,
.
*
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: N' /2 / PAGE NO.: 3/4/2-2
TS REQUIREMENT: [ rad'.E4,cd e w Lew f, / %L ', sv e/er r6// 4e co//ec/coryur.y
,
-/s % h G.IL.I-I-f. 4 pU .' in. Mr o d ~' M h c4 + rL d e< cc) n ' A
O s e m . + 4 //La <hiv e eJ navn + 4 f4 <w.,.o0 , f- Tog /.a ') n ./-t 't ded ' cyt.7lAh
-
LIC. ' PROCEDURE N0. :#[ir.0 -6576 ISSUEDA[E: ? REV.: 7 "*[g ,(,
TITLE: 7
'
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? n W fff-/ E y m p
/
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? ,
REMARKS: f?> n c cl~. sf P -oo s -a c/c Jts %f M Neu ec/ .
STATUS OF ITEM @
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
CLOSED
4./2. l b
~
(fft) Jfu t h /14~.g. Oswan) idroce dve e- ride a 9~5 er. nL
// / /
_
- / 1
1 INSPECTOR (S'[////[M b d ~
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPfCTIONRIPORTd-458/l_-~
YES NO
Were problems corrected?
i
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 8 5 -35 PAGE N0.: A -YJ G
I
A
, ,
-
s
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: N', / 2 . 7 PAGE h0.: 3/4 / A -/ 3
TS REQUIREMENT: L e d ou ew ru s ,Lt/h c~eL & ./ du,~j A ,ue w) se r afim / %
m e. e ,m /2 u A
LIC. PROCEDURE N0.: 37F-ooo-GenISSUE DATE: ? REV.: ?
TITLE:
7
'
YES g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? W #6[.Espect '
I
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? .
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? .r
'
/sA , rrwed .
REMARKS: [#voca M t S 7~F - o o o - 6 G 7 [fA w /
STATUS OF ITEM h CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
Afu e f /laut. 4 An ud/ svo et dove cmwl. TT 4. I L 1 4 e D-L,
Ifpf '
/
// _
l INSPECTOR (S): 91/ t_, Di ~
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPYCTIONREP0d50-458/~ J
YES M
Were problems corrected?
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
l
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ FS-35 PAGE N0.: A .$ 7
a
-- - __
- _ _ - _ _ _ _- ___ _ ___. _ ______ _
.y/ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y. /2. 3 PAGE NO.: 1/4' /s.-/'/
TS REQUIREMENT:
f/e L 4*//4sn du Cm a-,ri Mo , r' - r 6 // 4 4
'
l
ck sce.N d d dI O T)C M
,
7
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 3rr>.e.e-t. cry ISSUE DATE: ? REV.:
7
TITLE: '
YES NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS? 7)N #o / 5 fee #
'
I
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
b
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement? f '
L Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown? 8
- REMARKS: A n t # /e4. SrP-coo - 6CI V 44.s >ro / A4ee ) nu ed .
b STATUS OF ITEM @ CLOSED 3
'~
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
4.'/ 2. s d e b e. & . ,
% Afusf WhitTinierend nroc.edet- weri YS
/
/
_
's
/,i,, !
o _
I
INSPECTOR ('S): Mdb[4 d N -
'
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INShECTIONREP0d50-458/_ -
YES g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified? i
} '
STATUS OF ITEM OPEN CLOSED
REMARKS:
'
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-M PAGE NO.: N '/JP ,
l
!
- - - - _
}}