ML20072U237

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:01, 21 May 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Revised Tech Spec Page.Proposed Changes Reviewed & Approved by Both Onsite & Offsite Review Per Util Procedure
ML20072U237
Person / Time
Site: Byron, Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/1991
From: Checca A
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: Murley T
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20072U240 List:
References
TAC-M69527, TAC-M69528, TAC-M69529, TAC-M69530, NUDOCS 9104190063
Download: ML20072U237 (3)


Text

. _ _ _

  • - Ccmm:nwealth Edison l

_)

v 1400 Opus Place Downers Grove, Illinois 60515 4 ,

}ht i April 8,1991 Dr. Thomas E. Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission '

Washington, D.C. 20555 Attn: Document Control Desk

Subject:

Byron Station Units 1 and 2 Braldwood Station Units 1 and 2 Amendment of Facility Operating Licenses NPF-37, NPF 66, NPF 72, and NPF 7','

NRC Docket Nos. 50 454/455 and 50 455/456 IAC.Nos mM6952L_6.9528 m69529 m69530

Reference:

(a) October 4,1988 letter from R.A. Chrzanowski to T.E. Murley.

(b) August 14,1989 letter from R.A. Chrzanowski to i.E. Murley.

(c) March 20,1991 letter from A.R. Checca to T.E. Murley.

Dear Dr. Murley Reference (a) provided the request for amendment to the Byron and Braldwood Station Technical Specifications to permit the use of continuous pressure testing of the containment airlock door seal gaskets in lieu of manual testing.

Reference (b) provided information about the radiation exposure reduction that would occur with this amendment. After discussions with the staff it was determined that additional surveillance testing of the containment airlock seals would increase the assurance that the limiting condition for operation would be met. Consequently, a revised technical specification page was submitted in reference (c).

Through an administrative oversite, reference (c) did not include the revised page for the Byron Technical Specifications. The revised Byron Technical Specification page is contained in the enclosure. The proposed change has been reviewed and approved by both on site and off-site review in accordance with Commonwealth Edison procedures. Commonwealth Edison has reviewed this proposed amendment M accordance with 10 CFR 50.59(c) and has determined that no significant hazC ,

consideration exists. This evaluation was previously submitted in reference (a).

910419o063 9104os s\

/ c ID767:2 hDR ADock ocoo 4 1

- - - _ - - _ _ _ _ .