ML19330A267
| ML19330A267 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 09/08/1976 |
| From: | Griffin R SENATE |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS (OCA) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19330A265 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8007151070 | |
| Download: ML19330A267 (10) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- .
- s. .
. -~ ~
v., .
- ~ . . ... - . .
N
., \
s "I,Gnittb 06tates @tnate
~
i Washington, D. C, Pt **
- 8 ; 19.1.6
~
Resp:cifully referred to Congressional Liaison Nuclear Regr.latory Com.
- I would appreciate a "
review of the matter de-scribed in the attached letter. Please send me an appropriate report and return the correspondence. Thank you, F
..e ,s.
f3
- 300'd
- ste ; _.g / -
Tic- - 3 , , f} . 4}, ' ROBERT P GRI - I V " U. S S ver= No.3 um ... .
-+
e 8007151.07 . G 9
.._.. .-.-- Ny
.f/z'6,/976 An&3%lAc//<k --
Ka ( ,womas/P~nds to&au=& Aa/ W aa p ud&-a p .adal.
.0/asw6 6 2 w 2Lwys(La;At.
.sMaA.u.LdadaautihJw I *
. W W L A s* M t/ft-c" 4 v W A M de.O.<r* ....
- . L .. w - y :. a & m 4 L 2 / w p M
~p dz AmaxpnJA
.knAu.da a.-:L,uep6_f.aJtwe sntda&gma-p/~s.n.AM_-
-; & % A s a j k a u L - d a A t 2esukAaffLe/Areb/,AGaj'.zt s.
.n., s a m .w a~ z u r g % s 4
.92AddedJh.kl&qL./w.aby
.knel,JugAu2WwaAya=
<aun./<Ayp 6m44 %AA-p
<//1+MdLwwld .L.Zd&g y &__
L
.&ba.m.22&xiniM.vlR/ma X&a 4%geu2'g . X ta h . M . A .-...
Ag2djAs.l.L afkzk.Ad f. l l
. . ~
qy e
., ~
*
- e
- 4 A m a a;g < W Jwg azad&dLAhze.,Ad2/mi1 'atou a c A d k k d E z h / A d w w 2or d a l
.aec1JlduG7 Xta-edc4Ap&~ A cfsp sanledvkI.aby.w d M y -
.A.enR6,s.dme.nada .a~. -
..s n.4kuJ- % a hXs.26.on2CAdaupnJdpd. ~.
/ [.sJZe.2Kk H &-svArn 14.u.acu g a/wo.fa.wu.d4L,sa.cL n &dr.o,saw.
kja&y.14&aw,J.JM4,.C,xAid. s e n N A ..d'c2 4 a- A / 21- A p ,/ b p. L e + , 2 : / ~ ..: u u x p ' /byan.an,
- XEpufk.aw16nAhdan,2 den pa tspynpupuu~ut p .j .za L.pz+nusw l nwacLuhw k m2w? A u. .
l f(bdLth.bw .b~b~ eL &y. v 1/ b -&s.- -- e #
. .s
... f.u.a p .e 4 a +4+Ldo-w,.uk&&_
.LuiZdc.0.wxf&~lup.fr.;ttasub e 4 2/a k m 12G L .- -
. ....$.d.e. AA.2e}u4.d4c. . .&ted a.u -
gQ1s4.ac%m 4 a w k W .- eun..l 227.se;&.uZMdLaLp. .m. lea-f g ley %.Ztm.~Xta.-fylts/7/ M =
- . p --
p .a.o cLp.apl d.,9%9%dMn
.m.nwAJtaAma.2dadLg-A1Fw,. . --- ..
~
z
. S;en.m abd76 R .A 6 x p& h a,4. % A e p.ny &&&c auf endnk-dAux -
.dkwod.x.n+/!Lsp.cs.uc!sm4'.-m A m mefrA .aua2 6 sp.J 7/1.<u.,,kgsA. 4wuadl .patidq-weL,.
y '
...Jr b & -y n Q ~.L.
. . . . . . _ . . . .. _. . _. .r+Me 1[%
pg g;. g ,,g g a a g .
.. 92c M w d ,Sr.rb Lz M E 6. D _.
e 8 i i
+ ,
m n .. ww..e s.- a, .m g y . m. w+.
...,. e .
.tbio +m,ms .l A e Ff';h ,
g ..;; . p tJ .N ' ~ .y 1 ~ O, ,,, m@
; ,. g 4,g.,,f b ; d 6 6 W
~0. 0 .
} ' I' o ,S *t.. .h h ,f .$n, ? 'i ~Y n'*O^YM & M'O" W
. WASHINGTONTAP) -The chemical'* " Although nu c lear energy is still in its exposed to small amour.ts of natural cxplosion at a nuclear fuel reprocessing . infancy, the industry has a good safety radiation, some experts fearularger f;cility In Richland Wash., Js likely to <rrecord, with few cases of exposure and . doses could cause ' birth defects and can-b:rJ up the debate over the safety of no fatalities in commerical operations, cer. .'- . ~ 'm.v::m .mr." ..N + + s <
gy Last year; nuclear energy provided un. . . Critics. worry about. accidental re,
. thsEightU.S. nuclear workers powerindustry..-
at the Hanford Nuc a;le-pders7 per cent of. the nation's, efec. ' leases of radiation at any step during Er Reservation were' exposed to'radl .
~c tion efter the explosion Ibtonda~y i cent of the Inside%tricity.
produced electricity It.ls expected by 1985. c After touranium. grow tois 28 ., mined per from-.the the long fuel-han _ o "glovebox." a small, sealed com. . 'The U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Com. earth, it is packdd in fuel rods, usually partment through which, workers.,usey mission and.. environmental groups as a mixture with ceramic . materials rubber gloves to handle radioactive ena? rdiffer over.thd potential hazards from , covered with ' steel. .They ace trans-
/ terials. T -
whrm 4Fy e -the growing Industry. i M.- 1 Ported, usually in trucks.. to nuclear
'y Six . workers were decontaminated' '* Critics and ' supporters. generally plants..They travel the highways again and sent home. while two others were . agree a reactor.. composed of spaced after they are used for disposal or repr.
still in isolation undergoing washings to Oclusters of fuel rods. could not create a ocessing.n .~4 -im t- ?
- c': . '. ,f*
remtve radioactivity an official said. nuclear explosion, which requires the The Hanford facility. operated by At. Two r.urses who-work at a medical fa. . slamming together of very pure atomic tantic . Richfield for the. Energy Re. cility at the plant also weretwashed andf% materials a m6. - i ,.. . ,e search and.Developcnerit .Adminis-n ems u. tration, has both..reprofessing and returned to work immediatelyAOsly:ab w +I
~
em-Il amount of radioactive materlaM Mcgitics feanan unHkel.y , co m* wasta disposal activities. $ :.:6 rmm. ..,.,,,.g.
- 4. w . . . . .
1:aked out of the remote buisding wher.e,,. . sabotage.could bination of amalfunction cause reactor core to 4. accidents or . , nc Critics fear . exposure. .cou 1 melt and break through its containment from highway 'or processing accidents.
.(e2Pthoush thb 11 t in Ive - . . ./ natural disasters or terrorist sabotage.
-nucteer reactori the mishap may touch., structures.. . .-...
,' radioactive ' To datei nuclear accidents have not cff a new;round of-demands for safe- : fuel. and Waste products vaporized by 'resulted in calamaties or mass public L guards at all nuclear installations, in-- .their own' heat. cou!( spread ' through , exposure to radiation Industry leaders f cluding both chemical facilities and the c the air and reach thodsands of people, point to the record'as proof.the safe-
,nearly five- dozen. commercial p ants.now producing power from nuclear 1s '. depending on local geography an
- pion myuummeresseween,siangoc__.-_..mweather.v o.nd.itions.. --
.% . m Whi.le
..u win everyone isc .
o.um.. ;.Ske
.. ptics claim a disaster wil(- , strike t<
4 t. . .'** pf g .f.x;6 \y Q :., .yL pg. v , qp yyQ Q, n ;,...-
. . - . .c
.ylp J ,y . . ,q.s,'.. ' . 5%:.W N . ,% g.5.{
.W . h p @ e g r e,. .g . p ;. g ; . , +.; p .v.
. . .wg.q NMhn.tbN
. . . hlb.3hN.h W
- V'
" " - + d t b w . h J. 4 , [ ' g .y '. y g
*~- - - J :0
.f sventually, and the W ysafeguards
., -- .---w 'are not i f'"it said breeder des"gns i should empha, could *not be transferred direcily to Ws. ' 9
- foolproof..
Sirenwhilel'.aW' panel'of 'dN. r $ h8f28 pmvis{ogs for the contaimment of ter. Instead, the temperature d -' of its core atomic. stfety,,has . told the. NRC ' ~lt. *n . mm popularly known as ..would be controlled-by the circulation' >~1 sh:uld consider.the possibility'of a dis.9- re-catchers." whose function would of molten metal, scdium, which would ! %- astrous tecident in designing the experil ."be to catch. notten fuel and scatter it, then pass the heat on through ' metal , rn'ntal'.* breeder ^. reactor of the future ducing its nuclear reactions and prg . walls to. water in a separate circulation S-Aftir nearly. two years of review E I 8 "c8pe- : +-wf & e .. q , system.
,, 4 ,,y j.+
- Advisory' Committee of Reactor' $a:the avimumntal groups lo~ng have What the environmentalists fear'IE a '";O fe- warningnthe. breeder reactor .;Ioss of coolant" accident that..would ^
guardArgreed' with supporters:of.the breederc prograinJtliat the chances. of. u drpose .a- rnelt.down hazard :that . let a reactor core overheat to.the point *~
" but ' the could. expose the public to dangerous . that its fuel would warp or melt, bring-auch sernruittee c1 said.nobody.could disaster;are nmote. day,'with .7 tion, although conceding the . Ing larget amounts of fuel together and s
~.. cess ch an accident;. appear .generatin'g "~~ even more heat. .
- 5 ? -' ., ,, .:
certainty Th) committee that concluded;in it could notaoccur ,'re'p"o$ '" 9' W M N ' M 61' . P O SW 'l i circulated Afonday by the NRC; designs r#'The'coveiitiona[niclear n react' ors in '~~ - a pmens euld ~ l! f;r th> proposed: Liquid .. Metal. Fast . today's atomic 1 power pbnts use ur?' p $n' r 1 d
~ '
~ '
Breeder Reactor.should consider the. . nium fuel rods to heat water and ' Th "
- possibility cuse th3 reactor of. malfunctiona core to melt..', m ,thate.could
, duce steam
+>"+ to
; drive'electic y e, gene,a eto$
to n'ot Ugum b at any way a- - Th3 mport.said attention shoul[lM;{turbinei/'p*'o*s*Mr"e'eder tThe pro Ye'acl[r wy65t[ ~ ** ""**I **
]
flven tochance two possible an explosionresults cpuld re-' of a melt.l/. nuclear reactions. powerful 0- Er
,wur.th2 .~ . . .enough W:ttwr lto... O.W.cr use: plutonium
- n. 'astits
- t. blasting open the reactor and its.. turn an unusable type of uraniu into.- ~-
Still, "the c'ommitt' ee 'c'o'nc'luded/ th'ere
~ - " '
Juilding and releasing radioactive ma. more plutonium it could- , crials, and the alternative that.without duce more .new;i' atomic #actuall e uEer ainty about .! fuel than !Kploding the melted nuclear fuel could burns Jupi. earning its breeder nick- would behave *to*make # " '** # # " "*NY it a good idea to mt up (cough to burn its way7through ^ name.' ~ "*"
- W-. , . . . ,
- arriers and release ,radth that.
- But" thelb'rEfe'r' Teadthr' ' uld "- as a pa the W*t 19tifhwMr;3. .f,d ... a
.g a_ tag ,gtemper,a,tures. so high its h b r~
er ~ . -- n .n.. m.u. w - . . u.~ m .~ ~.,t=.w n',a n r., w :- y r.;'. y .. * ..y . .ey :a.c n . e . . . y a ~. .. . :
'> D .. $ $ ?? y.v,3 Y W . h h: Y. ;lm. %,~ . x ,x- ~ ln... ~ .fll.$h5'?y$ffk N
.l .T),*I o..h?& $$, %m $o ?m$$ w &agr.N$, hS w w$.&e W
. wh.a e.&m .-
i , t
.rD*F"_"'
,_ '"1 ~Ar
, ,~ :.5 '
'Y nMon@$. u; f .' fgh4My' ilW,M.h.pN$rf ' um
'f/>1 dish}ldMW Jecsy. $[;Df,M.
.ih W,%yg W,im m.,
NRM .f
- y {,
,hkS.}
- 4. . ;
,g h N f .j#U WB 76DD Mis d4 &Nh . openghose:p[roceedings ano examme ;med l.c fett and , cepsms .
'of f radl
. G Da ;.s y .
.ther,envirbamental Active . waste'disposalJAt.Mi f imprat "dtendoit lg .the NRC to, hear the jnew licensing rdBqhrdi(A
, y, , M fhfntis ,
enentir.l.1MiUq., M'//T Od
}j ~ ,g,j,[,]g .ily News s.,taff.w. t,it ..g.)
- c. .
I f . (NRC) los( round hre'e 6f,'thei a l {. $ se!'0 .'obilgedL to:, consider 4 energ .rcor9rif " ryation al manuev'erings 16' keep,h h6 Id d react 01 eafety questionsi' ,. X jshhierd and Ian ponents;untili
'he g f dustplant. ,bnder;,consfruellon':an [thd, lndr unfettered bf pohintially,,peva the'Suprem4 Court,(whic .
d e )I ' ppdalb er' until thulice st ' tied sho
't6quirementeTre d6!
nt)n ' D. p peals hangefu, sed,both, e is rict of of a Co'u parklts tivd
- p. p ,g, )r, hs , .e[
glarey , 79
- r
,t h
ga e a l I a r g .J. extension. b L ,the ,effqctlyeh6ss,sfcond
.:of%It' hes,m6re ' cept:Initheinpfellate fxtension'refusa lega thari practical bearing...icom rilf it'losei,lteadelacase.in cotisfruction'ht beford'the! least antil De.4 j Ju, .21.decl40ns that questlog N3C Il .(The .NRC' Issued, kn August ile i licy & AS LBa Th4' N RD , figuFes .,it' tan .' bolfe'd
! ..:ce jing pro i
.i t state' ment settingein inotioneall thdILthe. npironn'tentalImpact of wesM %,
;,, .2,Verno,n V ,ccedinlid Ih,Midt),r;d an4,gj5 ,. . .
. ,. .Lga* y. (appellatefdecisions' requirements.'abMposa(l enoughibt,then td.hllowddts o e, ; s now, o , y,
., At Midland. the quast. judicial..three,iconstruction and operation approvels.~' i
>? .s , ,
. ..~
_ .ww . + .., . .,.s ,, , ca ;. y . ,:.a i
.;y pgat}
D o 9
\
i
~
f , [
. g S R:~ %% _ _
de s 01 em 8 c up 6 rt.' i 'tyl r appellat6 !5didn Ionf t us hg c lor's quest rt . .3, b'k'. fuel repdoce sing: plants have been*yjt. The gg" tg*gg g. ,,h i J-
. 'subjbet of.estvironmentallnfpact is' , Thursday . removes,.one,argumshi @ . matter of policy it was not a godd Idelt e rnentt'. for' ;niere (th6n ' two; years, Verment Nankee; the .othet 6tillt IVed;ln the. appellate..dee sioni hd .t6~'go:hhead::witit s the,(ASLU ' thow , h [J, '
I have.been.' denied interintilicensthg y 't , e,use hearing (onPeonstrucil6n whil ' R } d Newgork stat 6; federal (appeeld Cons'u.ttsr6 have.been using agains.t the' both NRCiand CInsum' era dreic'o 'l 'l sc' the e neerta i le , Ibiht t . I ikv he om. t in a g Consumbreghave . Menfpr6 6 ;a,h u an ppellit6 v C 'und/ptions.jThb
.ving' b NRC,ilslgolhd erkuedithe N bhad-, ,
Juileilletl6h16h.yya, .h.a nkee
)ffn' 9;n.iatt,.tr;g,:qi;j.urned*Ni' (Vefinidnt Clistry','.tne'
,.ggv 7, ChIcedoIeU . i
/
adt,wlthlthObolicy; statement
/ form thd,ASLBe'iisd '
lurse an'd.tAlkingLtoJthe Justice eed.wlth)'hd. Ill ental attorne > cens4 questlo'n'sh' Mi4iU!f ks '.i fng,d against Midland:lleens .i9 t
'tagainthe case'y %hd'6acce6sfullyr
'ue utlan ppeal',tolthe B i!All.
m6nt ansumers is.*d t k Its arg})U3'.{{ ' Vefmo;wb 'did was;say; we agre(njhlth ab6,?.Q n %:-) M e Courty urner tai l.' nt. Yankeb','Fdald 'Jddd' Bacon . shut ,down 'c6n6ttuction
< asked ithe ANRC Friday 'to* M'- 1 here' the con 6'J.M.'
lthe ALB decision on constructioit ponsumers attorney,; lit its'te' quest. to 's J thq NRC to delay the ASI.B and the cod ." 4'. d preparing a, petition to appeal to, - t ; g + 1., 'a. ' f lake,,"..h/ ywith the ap^g1 j y[d,ecisl6nh;?lgg r(c[pellatec,c.; ,.:4, J g p
- y. q.,p4 yj,3 ;. ,
- A h, it 7 nna ....,s .. ... ., _ ,.;;,,,,,..,._,j,,gd.4.
, .,:ij[.
,1 g q. {u u,aever, are now t .
a o < a
+-Gbg m-mmwmp m. y.y .m.w.s S,m.,ety,, ,, , . ./BP,
.c
;' ara.,,s.mbunts.,r T&Ato'Jssue.9
.c q . ' = it -
y g. > .y - f.y
.~,4
,2
.-G.,*.,
- m. icsWaste:DsbatE
. . -.e. .1.... b'
, r.-:$' ;l,.* j .;LY Y ) s):; ,:.:,.f m.,*;
? . ..
,*t.W.n*+,; '
,ia ?;g> :v.
.~..
r. Y Lt of the debate c,ver whether Michigan is seeIT SHOULD BE made clear at the ou lected as m' dump site for atomic wastes that- Washington and Idaho deserts, and quite an-;. . thaissue is notwhether the wastes go here or [ lated regions , ry it? such as Michigan an ts Ohio, NewYork or anywhere else. It's no ~ near, cities that, besides s.4 their own resident ' Michigan's nuclear refuse than it is for Michi ;more right that another state accom states. As long as the nation is committed togan.reto ~ provide an atomic burial frortr" nucleat power production and other peaceful ', site avarlablein . the ' the northeasieni U S "
, wwhere ta be until they wasteslose their radioactivity-- that will have to be put some a f' tract' owne
, hich could take u,p,to a quarter of a.milhon.S on L'ake Huron's Adagis Point. Atleast'three ysars. J.7 gge ., o her sites are o' n or near the Hurna shored fr
; The real @ssue1 mgp'isMM whetherthe M;t'line.andanother @ technology would ~;uirea'chunicof i the ~ ,
- exists to store nuclear was' t es' safely..and Black. if y, Lake State Forest The possible th reat
' d
\ st does, whEther. the sadustry ss capableg,,,,,,, of :,gy,,,,geg,,, yg gy,,p gum
,,,gg.po,,,, ,y, ,,,,,
s employirst that technology to ensure that ', g,,3 , ,,,,, 5, y,,,on_ a
- - hamstr life and the envsronmeny are .not3 s,,,e,,gg;;,,,,3, y,yg;g , ,,g,g,y,,,
, en ,g, y,,n,y,ngy_
ticulrrly encouragsng. . , . oft,f tf ps , usmp: riled:The evelopment" scotein neither~ case osparT s Scientistristall are. debating whether.the . Administration unless it prepares an 'envi . , storage of radioact2ve materials in salt beds.. ronn' ental. impact statement on any pro-es is proposeti for Michigan, or;under grea. posed Michigan site could be the catalyst for- ' shiilds of granite, as has been proposed ; i.T
, ' Rocky Mountain tegions,is.wrea,lly 9,* safe t.ng?;:.
H. Lynti fondahl also says.hi will '- or,fgry.
.T.O J -;s;.- 4$.2,Ws. f ..hsucn l' a dischssion. -ner
.wastes Th1re alsoplaces fronitheir is the problern of origin'to th's stor . it. : shipping the!,Yintroducelegislationthis'fal!"to stimulate knd expand the debate; more than 30 years
%matter in.relatively isolated areas,.such ass y policy'.'in the are ,
- .Q:tM , L. M,p.d.ny.p>g ~ sty:Such a^!aw would require a storage facility; .
N '. _ *
;fto be certified by the Public Service Cone rr0 ? mission and appioved bf the Legislature? -
A% W Despite the Insistence of some F9DXolfi. ..
.$ k ,
I Wur s'kcials 'that ." state and' local governments1
.+ Y' ~ '
4 k: ]h;fe'ral gov' einment," it would be both Joltist *
% h Ncally and, tactically difficult-for ERDA to -j .
h.iniertide bdtirthe PSCandthe state's legis .\ y , b
... _.I 2 &.lators n .
m % c) & .. J.b b N .searg. l ,f
,U,tc'. .g Q. y
;4;n_
.' ' Yl[,iN;w.l p
7 . L ot.Jiu,,c[ganstorageJ t,esdL , t . c /REelleys.34
.,g. o.. .. .
-- f,f Michiga?rcould tura.to the public's benefityy [
S.o4+;.g.ac.M4W,/Jondah!M.G**Q.6yet q6,rnuefearwlg:r.ujgt,w,he m if,it spurs the' liirid of re;examinati'ori of.E Close;l Trneededon atomic' waste question thatpeop y e'every ! s.d Mc #1WlM9.1MGBastestorage E;.%wherehaveanghttoexpect :9 .:.g ;,j; . .w fM:D 'i;.;ULf.h ti:.t.h M-anM!rs.Js'.n
~
'\
.g
\
_'w n QJ n n. - a)~%
,: h, w . w~ to ties:
wi9ld}.Nu;ci,tWTggg41[:an.a mC Facm.., . n M clear
- $ -% % f${W..h$f7.
.' "f.$ f %
4 tar a result of
- 4. 7.hf1@;./.6 '
d
. fing errors. O" .y Je::.C.Ap., ; a VOTERS of atleast four,and possibly sur, -rtural djlant..the amage ap f.t staus.willdecide this falfwhether to clamp,1.iIn the case of the Midlant also instructed the N
^
l firnt state co'ntrollod th'e7n'ticleic eneEgy.in .dustry.Butth.e Nu siden whethercithe simplel alternative
~
d conservationmight ne siortreceit!fachievedin'6ne'feilswoop'what. R
$ for a nu'elear power facilitp. " gate the ne
' energy. -
niany'nBeleai critic's hadlohg' sought'Idligis
~
it'i> against this background thdt the states 4 la'ive re11ef.ItWu'chmtly dectir'ed Oregon., k'mo?atorium,on'.licen&.2g idf .o pf Washington b hether- to i Montana and Colo- 0 structiod.iintille ompletes isg*..)!rado (thor'ough 0 willtvote in.Novem sttof lthe dinstal fer:w?*f tightly restric environmentalimpact.o
- pent.Wacto'c)ftfel',and: disposing) sr.fetysyttenisbefor sh havebeett oilisucjear$gnd. Ohio;siting, atomic waste dis t ll"be-temporaiyiwith s earff a's]latforiof t ey
" wastecThe. respite wi tested under actual working conditions. i
.fulilicensinglpossibly to resume a 8. citizens' groups have'tintil d4Labor Diy to get ;q .
n;xtDecembersp pg.gf.)fq$ prig,:. h ~ = 1 Q 21.000 petition signatures.th,ey
'BuMh}[2EhNs beeftmade, f ~i th Anzona t
n13io aeritics succeeded in gettmg f a nuclearstill j m
*i hatU.S.* Court (ifare Appealirbling to' ret iast n ont ,g_jn}tiat,i7eopthefallballot,butnuclearprop t
there;still
^
odsianding illhave to -q'uestiog i nents smmed,iateffliledlegal mot onsA h'ichigan-in s
' thousnefe'a'rpdivePsitetytharw ..
b2 answered beforeith'e country.*coinmits.$.rnove .genough . signatures it: clus. tmie - ' u -- 'around, but< more al'its energy: eggs'to this jatticular
~ .
' 4-d d_.%!L
#u . , . , g@S c . "S.ould9tialliY
- b. eforethe 19.78 election.t ." her!
basiierd h. i n3 g came In r,esponse ! I A we.have l ed. itorialized before whetceed or S,gnificantly,t e i k blyon no-;;,L ,
- i
'tolegalcha!!enges to Ccnsumer Em i et Co's,;;;';these in
.. Verm'oni. Yankee plant'at Vernon. Vt.l1.g-t licensing' board now will. fi ddecide whether lif tsce; nuclear ; pub!!o safety; and be . ena d
*y. Aolvee neerns,# '
pom is,co
~
cenies ice the iitwo plants l approval ~: should A.* backedbe modi Atomic eor'su'speiided. ladustrial Forum The a
.the NRC to reconsider its or g na* 4:
of.thellcanses.E ' N W%V *
< ihNf.y.Q'
- fDJ 2 k'nswieitge'd,^after did'. the defeat al the C
.;.y ;r; . Yankee TBotlltheMid1Nd$d theVermont ' .i'CfiuclesiVote' half." lanced @4"4 the bo'il, b::t plants' have been rtddled risgivil2gswithabodt nuclear )ower. $ f1 '
co'nstructionproblems that
,- QThe.NRC. temporary morat'orium on nu-potestial consequences fcleafweren't so' plant licedsing grim.
is.important E evidence? Vermont Yankee's (upside-down installation dof the-key linWthat *!?ncing the' boil" indeed won't'b element that'the indus'try sin controlling nucleaEieactioni.Fe l* era refenough,but - % ' . :/must C also cure ' 0 9qstigators st Midland concluded on y. pu-
- I uef or* happenstance -
- hadhprevented strue.i'theinfectio .
l N 5 E. , .f hmp 'Eff
~m~ nu -
e 5
~
y.-}}