ML19330A267

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Nd Brown 760906 Ltr Opposing Facility Const for Review & Comment.Discusses Lack of Water Supply,Radwaste Disposal & Other Governmental Schemes for State of Mi
ML19330A267
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 09/08/1976
From: Griffin R
SENATE
To:
NRC OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS (OCA)
Shared Package
ML19330A265 List:
References
NUDOCS 8007151070
Download: ML19330A267 (10)
v • d • e


Text

- .

s. .

. -~ ~

v., .

- ~ . . ... - . .

N

., \

s "I,Gnittb 06tates @tnate

~

i Washington, D. C, Pt **

  • 8  ; 19.1.6

~

Resp:cifully referred to Congressional Liaison Nuclear Regr.latory Com.

  • I would appreciate a "

review of the matter de-scribed in the attached letter.

Please send me an appropriate report and return the correspondence.

Thank you, F

..e ,s.

f3

  • 300'd
ste  ; _.g / -

Tic- -

3 , , f} .

4}, '

ROBERT P GRI -

I V "

U. S S ver= No.3 um ... .

-+

e 8007151.07 .

G 9

.._.. .-.-- Ny

.f/z'6,/976 An&3%lAc//<k --

Ka ( ,womas/P~nds to&au=&

Aa/ W aa p ud&-a p .adal.

.0/asw6 6 2 w 2Lwys(La;At.

.sMaA.u.LdadaautihJw I *

. W W L A s* M t/ft-c" 4 v W A M de.O.<r* ....

. L .. w - y :. a & m 4 L 2 / w p M

~p dz AmaxpnJA

.knAu.da a.-:L,uep6_f.aJtwe sntda&gma-p/~s.n.AM_-

-; & % A s a j k a u L - d a A t 2esukAaffLe/Areb/,AGaj'.zt s.

.n., s a m .w a~ z u r g % s 4

.92AddedJh.kl&qL./w.aby

.knel,JugAu2WwaAya=

<aun./<Ayp 6m44 %AA-p

<//1+MdLwwld .L.Zd&g y &__

L

.&ba.m.22&xiniM.vlR/ma X&a 4%geu2'g . X ta h . M . A .-...

Ag2djAs.l.L afkzk.Ad f.

l l

. . ~

qy e

., ~

  • e
  • 4 A m a a;g < W Jwg azad&dLAhze.,Ad2/mi1 'atou a c A d k k d E z h / A d w w 2or d a l

.aec1JlduG7 Xta-edc4Ap&~ A cfsp sanledvkI.aby.w d M y -

.A.enR6,s.dme.nada .a~. -

..s n.4kuJ- % a hXs.26.on2CAdaupnJdpd. ~.

/ [.sJZe.2Kk H &-svArn 14.u.acu g a/wo.fa.wu.d4L,sa.cL n &dr.o,saw.

kja&y.14&aw,J.JM4,.C,xAid.

s e n N A ..d'c2 4 a- A / 21- A p ,/ b p.

L e + , 2 : / ~ ..: u u x p ' /byan.an,

XEpufk.aw16nAhdan,2 den pa tspynpupuu~ut p .j .za L.pz+nusw l nwacLuhw k m2w? A u. .

l f(bdLth.bw .b~b~ eL &y. v 1/ b -&s.- --

e #

. .s

... f.u.a p .e 4 a +4+Ldo-w,.uk&&_

.LuiZdc.0.wxf&~lup.fr.;ttasub e 4 2/a k m 12G L .- -

. ....$.d.e. AA.2e}u4.d4c. . .&ted a.u -

gQ1s4.ac%m 4 a w k W .-

eun..l 227.se;&.uZMdLaLp. .m. lea-f g ley %.Ztm.~Xta.-fylts/7/ M =

- . p --

p .a.o cLp.apl d.,9%9%dMn

.m.nwAJtaAma.2dadLg-A1Fw,. . --- ..

~

z

. S;en.m abd76 R .A 6 x p& h a,4. % A e p.ny &&&c auf endnk-dAux -

.dkwod.x.n+/!Lsp.cs.uc!sm4'.-m A m mefrA .aua2 6 sp.J 7/1.<u.,,kgsA. 4wuadl .patidq-weL,.

y '

...Jr b & -y n Q ~.L.

. . . . . . _ . . . .. _. . _. .r+Me 1[%

pg g;. g ,,g g a a g .

.. 92c M w d ,Sr.rb Lz M E 6. D _.

e 8 i

i

+ ,

m n .. ww..e s.- a, .m g y . m. w+.

...,. e .

.tbio +m,ms .l A e Ff';h ,

g ..;; . p tJ .N ' ~ .y 1 ~

O, ,,, m@

,. g 4,g.,,f b ; d 6 6 W

~0. 0 .

} ' I' o ,S *t.. .h h ,f .$n,  ? 'i ~Y n'*O^YM & M'O" W

. WASHINGTONTAP) -The chemical'* " Although nu c lear energy is still in its exposed to small amour.ts of natural cxplosion at a nuclear fuel reprocessing . infancy, the industry has a good safety radiation, some experts fearularger f;cility In Richland Wash., Js likely to <rrecord, with few cases of exposure and . doses could cause ' birth defects and can-b:rJ up the debate over the safety of no fatalities in commerical operations, cer. .'- . ~ 'm.v::m .mr." ..N + + s <

gy Last year; nuclear energy provided un. . . Critics. worry about. accidental re,

. thsEightU.S. nuclear workers powerindustry..-

at the Hanford Nuc a;le-pders7 per cent of. the nation's, efec. ' leases of radiation at any step during Er Reservation were' exposed to'radl .

~c tion efter the explosion Ibtonda~y i cent of the Inside%tricity.

produced electricity It.ls expected by 1985. c After touranium.

grow tois 28 ., mined per from-.the the long fuel-han _

o "glovebox." a small, sealed com. . 'The U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Com. earth, it is packdd in fuel rods, usually partment through which, workers.,usey mission and.. environmental groups as a mixture with ceramic . materials rubber gloves to handle radioactive ena? rdiffer over.thd potential hazards from , covered with ' steel. .They ace trans-

/ terials. T -

whrm 4Fy e -the growing Industry.

i M.- 1 Ported, usually in trucks.. to nuclear

'y Six . workers were decontaminated' '* Critics and ' supporters. generally plants..They travel the highways again and sent home. while two others were . agree a reactor.. composed of spaced after they are used for disposal or repr.

still in isolation undergoing washings to Oclusters of fuel rods. could not create a ocessing.n .~4 -im t- ?

  • c': . '. ,f*

remtve radioactivity an official said. nuclear explosion, which requires the The Hanford facility. operated by At.

Two r.urses who-work at a medical fa. . slamming together of very pure atomic tantic . Richfield for the. Energy Re.

cility at the plant also weretwashed andf% materials a m6. - i ,.. . ,e search and.Developcnerit .Adminis-n ems u. tration, has both..reprofessing and returned to work immediatelyAOsly:ab w +I

~

em-Il amount of radioactive materlaM Mcgitics feanan unHkel.y , co m* wasta disposal activities. $ :.:6 rmm. ..,.,,,.g.

4. w . . . . .

1:aked out of the remote buisding wher.e,,. . sabotage.could bination of amalfunction cause reactor core to 4. accidents or . , nc Critics fear . exposure. .cou 1 melt and break through its containment from highway 'or processing accidents.

.(e2Pthoush thb 11 t in Ive - . . ./ natural disasters or terrorist sabotage.

-nucteer reactori the mishap may touch., structures.. . .-...

,' radioactive ' To datei nuclear accidents have not cff a new;round of-demands for safe- : fuel. and Waste products vaporized by 'resulted in calamaties or mass public L guards at all nuclear installations, in-- .their own' heat. cou!( spread ' through , exposure to radiation Industry leaders f cluding both chemical facilities and the c the air and reach thodsands of people, point to the record'as proof.the safe-

,nearly five- dozen. commercial p ants.now producing power from nuclear 1s '. depending on local geography an

- pion myuummeresseween,siangoc__.-_..mweather.v o.nd.itions.. --

.% . m Whi.le

..u win everyone isc .

o.um..  ;.Ske

.. ptics claim a disaster wil(- , strike t<

4 t. . .'** pf g .f.x;6 \y Q :., .yL pg. v , qp yyQ Q, n ;,...-

. . - . .c

.ylp J ,y . . ,q.s,'.. ' . 5%:.W N . ,% g.5.{

.W . h p @ e g r e,. .g . p ;. g ; . , +.; p .v.

. . .wg.q NMhn.tbN

. . . hlb.3hN.h W

  • V'

" " - + d t b w . h J. 4 , [ ' g .y '. y g

  • ~- - - J :0

.f sventually, and the W ysafeguards

., -- .---w 'are not i f'"it said breeder des"gns i should empha, could *not be transferred direcily to Ws. ' 9

  • foolproof..

Sirenwhilel'.aW' panel'of 'dN. r $ h8f28 pmvis{ogs for the contaimment of ter. Instead, the temperature d -' of its core atomic. stfety,,has . told the. NRC ' ~lt. *n . mm popularly known as ..would be controlled-by the circulation' >~1 sh:uld consider.the possibility'of a dis.9- re-catchers." whose function would of molten metal, scdium, which would  !  %-

astrous tecident in designing the experil ."be to catch. notten fuel and scatter it, then pass the heat on through ' metal ,

rn'ntal'.* breeder ^. reactor of the future ducing its nuclear reactions and prg . walls to. water in a separate circulation S-Aftir nearly. two years of review E I 8 "c8pe- : +-wf & e .. q , system.

,, 4 ,,y j.+

  • Advisory' Committee of Reactor' $a:the avimumntal groups lo~ng have What the environmentalists fear'IE a '";O fe- warningnthe. breeder reactor .;Ioss of coolant" accident that..would ^

guardArgreed' with supporters:of.the breederc prograinJtliat the chances. of. u drpose .a- rnelt.down hazard :that . let a reactor core overheat to.the point *~

" but ' the could. expose the public to dangerous . that its fuel would warp or melt, bring-auch sernruittee c1 said.nobody.could disaster;are nmote. day,'with .7 tion, although conceding the . Ing larget amounts of fuel together and s

~.. cess ch an accident;. appear .generatin'g "~~ even more heat. .

  • 5 ? -' ., ,, .:

certainty Th) committee that concluded;in it could notaoccur ,'re'p"o$ '" 9' W M N ' M 61' .

P O SW 'l i circulated Afonday by the NRC; designs r#'The'coveiitiona[niclear n react' ors in '~~ - a pmens euld ~ l!

f;r th> proposed: Liquid .. Metal. Fast . today's atomic 1 power pbnts use ur?' p $n' r 1 d

~ '

~ '

Breeder Reactor.should consider the. . nium fuel rods to heat water and ' Th "

  • possibility cuse th3 reactor of. malfunctiona core to melt..', m ,thate.could

, duce steam

+>"+ to

drive'electic y e, gene,a eto$

to n'ot Ugum b at any way a- -

Th3 mport.said attention shoul[lM;{turbinei/'p*'o*s*Mr"e'eder tThe pro Ye'acl[r wy65t[ ~ ** ""**I **

]

flven tochance two possible an explosionresults cpuld re-' of a melt.l/. nuclear reactions. powerful 0- Er

,wur.th2 .~ . . .enough W:ttwr lto... O.W.cr use: plutonium

n. 'astits
t. blasting open the reactor and its.. turn an unusable type of uraniu into.- ~-

Still, "the c'ommitt' ee 'c'o'nc'luded/ th'ere

~ - " '

Juilding and releasing radioactive ma. more plutonium it could- ,

crials, and the alternative that.without duce more .new;i' atomic #actuall e uEer ainty about .!

fuel than

!Kploding the melted nuclear fuel could burns Jupi. earning its breeder nick- would behave *to*make # " '** # # " "*NY it a good idea to mt up (cough to burn its way7through ^ name.' ~ "*"

  • W-. , . . . ,
arriers and release ,radth that.
  • But" thelb'rEfe'r' Teadthr' ' uld "- as a pa the W*t 19tifhwMr;3. .f,d ... a

.g a_ tag ,gtemper,a,tures. so high its h b r~

er ~ . --

n .n.. m.u. w - . . u.~ m .~ ~.,t=.w n',a n r., w :-

y r.;'. y .. * ..y . .ey :a.c n . e . . . y a ~. .. . :

'> D .. $ $ ?? y.v,3 Y W . h h: Y. ;lm.  %,~ . x ,x- ~ ln... ~ .fll.$h5'?y$ffk N

.l .T),*I o..h?& $$, %m $o ?m$$ w &agr.N$, hS w w$.&e W

. wh.a e.&m .-

i ,

t

.rD*F"_"'

,_ '"1 ~Ar

, ,~  :.5 '

'Y nMon@$. u; f .' fgh4My' ilW,M.h.pN$rf ' um

'f/>1 dish}ldMW Jecsy. $[;Df,M.

.ih W,%yg W,im m.,

NRM .f

y {,

,hkS.}

4. . ;

,g h N f .j#U WB 76DD Mis d4 &Nh . openghose:p[roceedings ano examme ;med l.c fett and , cepsms .

'of f radl

. G Da ;.s y .

.ther,envirbamental Active . waste'disposalJAt.Mi f imprat "dtendoit lg .the NRC to, hear the jnew licensing rdBqhrdi(A

, y, , M fhfntis ,

enentir.l.1MiUq., M'//T Od

}j ~ ,g,j,[,]g .ily News s.,taff.w. t,it ..g.)

c. .

I f .

(NRC) los( round hre'e 6f,'thei a l {. $ se!'0 .'obilgedL to:, consider 4 energ .rcor9rif " ryation al manuev'erings 16' keep,h h6 Id d react 01 eafety questionsi' ,. X jshhierd and Ian ponents;untili

'he g f dustplant. ,bnder;,consfruellon':an [thd, lndr unfettered bf pohintially,,peva the'Suprem4 Court,(whic .

d e )I ' ppdalb er' until thulice st ' tied sho

't6quirementeTre d6!

nt)n '

D.

p peals hangefu, sed,both, e is rict of of a Co'u parklts tivd

p. p ,g, )r, hs , .e[

glarey , 79

  • r

,t h

ga e a l I a r g .J. extension. b L ,the ,effqctlyeh6ss,sfcond

.:of%It' hes,m6re ' cept:Initheinpfellate fxtension'refusa lega thari practical bearing...icom rilf it'losei,lteadelacase.in cotisfruction'ht beford'the! least antil De.4 j Ju, .21.decl40ns that questlog N3C Il .(The .NRC' Issued, kn August ile i licy & AS LBa Th4' N RD , figuFes .,it' tan .' bolfe'd

! ..:ce jing pro i

.i t state' ment settingein inotioneall thdILthe. npironn'tentalImpact of wesM %,

,, .2,Verno,n V ,ccedinlid Ih,Midt),r;d an4,gj5 ,. . .

. ,. .Lga* y. (appellatefdecisions' requirements.'abMposa(l enoughibt,then td.hllowddts o e,  ; s now, o , y,

., At Midland. the quast. judicial..three,iconstruction and operation approvels.~' i

>? .s , ,

. ..~

_ .ww . + .., . .,.s ,, , ca ;. y . ,:.a i

.;y pgat}

D o

9

\

i

~

f ,

[

. g S R:~ %% _ _

de s 01 em 8 c up 6 rt.' i 'tyl r appellat6 !5didn Ionf t us hg c lor's quest rt . .3, b'k'.

fuel repdoce sing: plants have been*yjt. The gg" tg*gg g. ,,h i J-

. 'subjbet of.estvironmentallnfpact is' , Thursday . removes,.one,argumshi @ . matter of policy it was not a godd Idelt e rnentt'. for' ;niere (th6n ' two; years, Verment Nankee; the .othet 6tillt IVed;ln the. appellate..dee sioni hd .t6~'go:hhead::witit s the,(ASLU ' thow , h [J, '

I have.been.' denied interintilicensthg y 't ,

e,use hearing (onPeonstrucil6n whil ' R }

d Newgork stat 6; federal (appeeld Cons'u.ttsr6 have.been using agains.t the' both NRCiand CInsum' era dreic'o 'l 'l sc' the e neerta i le , Ibiht t .

I ikv he om. t in a g Consumbreghave . Menfpr6 6 ;a,h u an ppellit6 v C 'und/ptions.jThb

.ving' b NRC,ilslgolhd erkuedithe N bhad-, ,

Juileilletl6h16h.yya, .h.a nkee

)ffn' 9;n.iatt,.tr;g,:qi;j.urned*Ni' (Vefinidnt Clistry','.tne'

,.ggv 7, ChIcedoIeU . i

/

adt,wlthlthObolicy; statement

/ form thd,ASLBe'iisd '

lurse an'd.tAlkingLtoJthe Justice eed.wlth)'hd. Ill ental attorne >

cens4 questlo'n'sh' Mi4iU!f ks '.i fng,d against Midland:lleens .i9 t

'tagainthe case'y %hd'6acce6sfullyr

'ue utlan ppeal',tolthe B i!All.

m6nt ansumers is.*d t k Its arg})U3'.(( ' Vefmo;wb 'did was;say; we agre(njhlth ab6,?.Q n %:-) M e Courty urner tai l.' nt. Yankeb','Fdald 'Jddd' Bacon . shut ,down 'c6n6ttuction

< asked ithe ANRC Friday 'to* M'- 1 here' the con 6'J.M.'

lthe ALB decision on constructioit ponsumers attorney,; lit its'te' quest. to 's J thq NRC to delay the ASI.B and the cod ." 4'.

d preparing a, petition to appeal to, -

t ; g + 1., 'a. ' f lake,,"..h/

ywith the ap^g1 j y[d,ecisl6nh;?lgg r(c[pellatec,c.; ,.:4, J g p

y. q.,p4 yj,3 ;. ,
  • A h, it 7 nna ....,s .. ... ., _ ,.;;,,,,,..,._,j,,gd.4.

, .,:ij[.

,1 g q. {u u,aever, are now t .

a o

< a

+-Gbg m-mmwmp m. y.y .m.w.s S,m.,ety,, ,, , . ./BP,

.c

' ara.,,s.mbunts.,r T&Ato'Jssue.9

.c q . ' = it -

y g. > .y -

f.y

.~,4

,2

.-G.,*.,

m. icsWaste:DsbatE

. . -.e. .1.... b'

, r.-:$' ;l,.* j .;LY Y ) s):; ,:.:,.f m.,*;

? . ..

,*t.W.n*+,; '

,ia ?;g> :v.

.~..

r.

Y Lt of the debate c,ver whether Michigan is seeIT SHOULD BE made clear at the ou lected as m' dump site for atomic wastes that- Washington and Idaho deserts, and quite an-;. .

thaissue is notwhether the wastes go here or [ lated regions , ry it? such as Michigan an ts Ohio, NewYork or anywhere else. It's no ~ near, cities that, besides s.4 their own resident '

Michigan's nuclear refuse than it is for Michi ;more right that another state accom states. As long as the nation is committed togan.reto ~

provide an atomic burial frortr" nucleat power production and other peaceful ', site avarlablein .

the '

the northeasieni U S "

, wwhere ta be until they wasteslose their radioactivity-- that will have to be put some a f' tract' owne

, hich could take u,p,to a quarter of a.milhon.S on L'ake Huron's Adagis Point. Atleast'three ysars. J.7 gge ., o her sites are o' n or near the Hurna shored fr

The real @ssue1 mgp'isMM whetherthe M;t'line.andanother @ technology would ~;uirea'chunicof i the ~ ,

- exists to store nuclear was' t es' safely..and Black. if y, Lake State Forest The possible th reat

' d

\

st does, whEther. the sadustry ss capableg,,,,,,, of :,gy,,,,geg,,,

yg gy,,p gum

,,,gg.po,,,, ,y, ,,,,,

s employirst that technology to ensure that ', g,,3 , ,,,,, 5, y,,,on_ a

- hamstr life and the envsronmeny are .not3 s,,,e,,gg;;,,,,3, y,yg;g , ,,g,g,y,,,

, en ,g, y,,n,y,ngy_

ticulrrly encouragsng. . , . oft,f tf ps , usmp: riled:The evelopment" scotein neither~ case osparT s Scientistristall are. debating whether.the . Administration unless it prepares an 'envi . ,

storage of radioact2ve materials in salt beds.. ronn' ental. impact statement on any pro-es is proposeti for Michigan, or;under grea. posed Michigan site could be the catalyst for- '

shiilds of granite, as has been proposed  ; i.T

, ' Rocky Mountain tegions,is.wrea,lly 9,* safe t.ng?;:.

H. Lynti fondahl also says.hi will '-

or,fgry.

.T.O J -;s;.- 4$.2,Ws. f ..hsucn l' a dischssion. -ner

.wastes Th1re alsoplaces fronitheir is the problern of origin'to th's stor . it.  : shipping the!,Yintroducelegislationthis'fal!"to stimulate knd expand the debate; more than 30 years

%matter in.relatively isolated areas,.such ass y policy'.'in the are ,

- .Q:tM , L. M,p.d.ny.p>g ~ sty:Such a^!aw would require a storage facility; .

N '. _ *

fto be certified by the Public Service Cone rr0  ? mission and appioved bf the Legislature? -

A% W Despite the Insistence of some F9DXolfi. ..

.$ k ,

I Wur s'kcials 'that ." state and' local governments1

.+ Y' ~ '

4 k: ]h;fe'ral gov' einment," it would be both Joltist *

% h Ncally and, tactically difficult-for ERDA to -j .

h.iniertide bdtirthe PSCandthe state's legis .\

y ,

b

... _.I 2 &.lators n .

m % c) & ..

J.b b N .searg. l ,f

,U,tc'. .g Q. y

4;n_

.' ' Yl[,iN;w.l p

7 .

L ot.Jiu,,c[ganstorageJ t,esdL ,

t .

c /REelleys.34

.,g. o.. .. .

-- f,f Michiga?rcould tura.to the public's benefityy [

S.o4+;.g.ac.M4W,/Jondah!M.G**Q.6yet q6,rnuefearwlg:r.ujgt,w,he m

if,it spurs the' liirid of re;examinati'ori of.E Close;l Trneededon atomic' waste question thatpeop y e'every !

s.d Mc #1WlM9.1MGBastestorage E;.%wherehaveanghttoexpect :9 .:.g ;,j; . .w fM:D 'i;.;ULf.h ti:.t.h M-anM!rs.Js'.n

~

'\

.g

\

_'w n QJ n n. -

a)~%

,: h, w . w~ to ties:

wi9ld}.Nu;ci,tWTggg41[:an.a mC Facm.., .

n M clear

$ -%  % f${W..h$f7.

.' "f.$ f  %

4 tar a result of

4. 7.hf1@;./.6 '

d

. fing errors. O" .y Je::.C.Ap., ; a VOTERS of atleast four,and possibly sur, -rtural djlant..the amage ap f.t staus.willdecide this falfwhether to clamp,1.iIn the case of the Midlant also instructed the N

^

l firnt state co'ntrollod th'e7n'ticleic eneEgy.in .dustry.Butth.e Nu siden whethercithe simplel alternative

~

d conservationmight ne siortreceit!fachievedin'6ne'feilswoop'what. R

$ for a nu'elear power facilitp. " gate the ne

' energy. -

niany'nBeleai critic's hadlohg' sought'Idligis

~

it'i> against this background thdt the states 4

la'ive re11ef.ItWu'chmtly dectir'ed Oregon., k'mo?atorium,on'.licen&.2g idf .o pf Washington b hether- to i

Montana and Colo- 0 structiod.iintille ompletes isg*..)!rado (thor'ough 0 willtvote in.Novem sttof lthe dinstal fer:w?*f tightly restric environmentalimpact.o

  • pent.Wacto'c)ftfel',and: disposing) sr.fetysyttenisbefor sh havebeett oilisucjear$gnd. Ohio;siting, atomic waste dis t ll"be-temporaiyiwith s earff a's]latforiof t ey

" wastecThe. respite wi tested under actual working conditions.

i

.fulilicensinglpossibly to resume a 8. citizens' groups have'tintil d4Labor Diy to get ;q .

n;xtDecembersp pg.gf.)fq$ prig,:. h ~ = 1 Q 21.000 petition signatures.th,ey

'BuMh}[2EhNs beeftmade, f ~i th Anzona t

n13io aeritics succeeded in gettmg f a nuclearstill j m

  • i hatU.S.* Court (ifare Appealirbling to' ret iast n ont ,g_jn}tiat,i7eopthefallballot,butnuclearprop t

there;still

^

odsianding illhave to -q'uestiog i

nents smmed,iateffliledlegal mot onsA h'ichigan-in s

' thousnefe'a'rpdivePsitetytharw ..

b2 answered beforeith'e country.*coinmits.$.rnove .genough . signatures it: clus. tmie - '

u -- 'around, but<

more al'its energy: eggs'to this jatticular

~ .

' 4-d d_.%!L

  1. u . , . , g@S c . "S.ould9tialliY
b. eforethe 19.78 election.t ." her!

basiierd h. i n3 g came In r,esponse  ! I A we.have l ed. itorialized before whetceed or S,gnificantly,t e i k blyon no-;;,L ,

- i

'tolegalcha!!enges to Ccnsumer Em i et Co's,;;;';these in

.. Verm'oni. Yankee plant'at Vernon. Vt.l1.g-t licensing' board now will. fi ddecide whether lif tsce; nuclear  ; pub!!o safety; and be . ena d

  • y. Aolvee neerns,# '

pom is,co

~

cenies ice the iitwo plants l approval ~:

should A.* backedbe modi Atomic eor'su'speiided.

ladustrial Forum The a

.the NRC to reconsider its or g na* 4:

of.thellcanses.E ' N W%V *

< ihNf.y.Q'

  • fDJ 2 k'nswieitge'd,^after did'. the defeat al the C

.;.y ;r; . Yankee TBotlltheMid1Nd$d theVermont ' .i'CfiuclesiVote' half." lanced @4"4 the bo'il, b::t plants' have been rtddled risgivil2gswithabodt nuclear )ower. $ f1 '

co'nstructionproblems that

,- QThe.NRC. temporary morat'orium on nu-potestial consequences fcleafweren't so' plant licedsing grim.

is.important E evidence?

Vermont Yankee's (upside-down installation dof the-key linWthat *!?ncing the' boil" indeed won't'b element that'the indus'try sin controlling nucleaEieactioni.Fe l* era refenough,but - % ' . :/must C also cure '

0 9qstigators st Midland concluded on y. pu-

  • I uef or* happenstance -
  • hadhprevented strue.i'theinfectio .

l N 5 E. , .f hmp 'Eff

~m~ nu -

e 5

~

y.-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19330A267&oldid=2515775"