ML19331A746

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:56, 18 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Info Re Prof Misconduct Charges Against Licensing Proceeding Atty & Countercharges Against NRC Members, & Statuatory Authority Citation to Establish Hearing Panel & Allocate NRC Funds for Private Counsel
ML19331A746
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 01/17/1978
From: Dingell J
HOUSE OF REP., INTERSTATE & FOREIGN COMMERCE
To: Hendrie J
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML19331A744 List:
References
NUDOCS 8007210753
Download: ML19331A746 (2)


Text

_ - _ _ _ - - - _ _

.. .- e suin ermr mna. a am., m a

. , . . . m . a. - .

--.c o m .

.. , - . ~

';".8.*.,'.1. " ?' i.'". I' ' 72''*# '

CO!;GRESS OF THE '1:4 TED ST. ~5 ,

C;;f ' " *;:.!.~T.A'.'.".-T'O . HOUSE Cr REPRE3ENTATIVES

.. . mo - .

c.::. ; ..: "

"N,.'/ "'" '

  • c" " "
  • m ! = = ** "

l'*yq(-

.m u OT.*/. .". ., commrrte e., msrisr[rU 2 reacm caerace '

i. .'".;.$.', '. .

J .

.J .J J .J  : wpsu,nucyo::,a.g. psss. , , , , ,

D',b ., y_s-

~

.: s, 4 li January 17, 1978 ,, ,

r The Honorable Joseph . 'Hendrie - -

Chairman y Wuclcar Regulatory Commission ,

-: d Eachington, D. C. 2C655 . . - *

' @?

Dear Mr. chairman:

~

I have nc:ed recent news stories and press releases

.rclating to the establishment by the Nuclear Regulatory '

Cocoission of a spccial panel to hear chargas of " professional misconduct" against an attorney participating in a power plant

.11consing proceeding. I am'also aware that the accused attorney has filed -a complaint against two staff members of the Cor. mission.

t 5

In view of the unprecedented nature of this proceeding, I I request that I be advised of the basis of the allegations against

'all three partie,s. I also ask that the Commission supply mo .1 with a citation of its. statutory authority for establishing 8

'such a hearing panel and for independently procccding in the . .

chcsen manner. Furthermore, I request that you supply me with 1

the commission's statuto'ry authority for allocating Commission '

funds to retain a privato counsel to represent 'the accused staff '

in the proceeding. .

I am also curior.ts 5.f the fact that. the Constission is paying for the staff's counsel implies that. the.. Commission has already l-dctormined that the ' accused were actinJ within the scope of their {

t F.hority. If this is the case, and the complaint against thent -

is subsequcntly proven, would this not impute guilt to the '

Cocimission? If this is not the case and the complaint is found valid, does the Commission expect to be reimbursed by the two

-staf f ccmbers, and what is the prcsont understanding of these

-two individuals regarding this. possibility? '

h As the Commission is paying to retain the staff's counsel, J.?

is 'th'at coun'sel repre'senting the' intere'st of ther commission or tho ti two staff members?

p If the counsel's pritury loyalty is to the j.I percan pnying - the. foc, are the. ttco staff members being effectively affordett the right to counsel?- I would also like to know uho L.

sicle'cted tho staf f's councal and if this attorney and his firm L

_ ha s ever or is now representing any other parties before the '-

l CM.=.ission or any of its Boards.

1/15/13 - To ED0; P'tcpanc aepit] fo.t .11gnah.te ai: Chim.] Cat.h. due Coran - Feb. 2 l Csts t.o. Civun, Can.s, FE, CGC, OCA1 CCA !.a Ack-i L'apifated f.a EDO

  • 18-0172 . -

i.

80_0_7_2107 h - - _ - _ ' . - . - __ . _

t she Ironorable Joneph d. Hendrie paqu 2 *

  • January 17, 1978 y-Press stories indicate that the Co: aission is presenting d the case against the individual attorney but not against the -

g two staff members. If the Commission,has evidence relating to the 15 allegation, I would like to be advised as'to why the Cec.nission Q does not have a' responsibility to affirmatively present such O

. evidence. I also would like to be informed of the basis of the .

critoria to be used by the panel in judging " professional df.

misconduct. " Finally, I would like to be advised of the qualifications of the panel, how they were selected and any l{3 possible working relationship or experienece its members car  ;

- hn'..e had with the two accused staff members.

I look forward to your early response.

. With every good wish, '

. .r . /

./.' ,

Sincerely, -

.. < j .-

s-

.. .a- t'

. . . g , ,, .. y..vMys' . *)&g' ? - -

. t _, . .

~ - John D. Ding' ell

- ~ * ,

Chairman .

  • * ~

JDD:Jrm -

p . .

I .

/ <

~

.r, ."

- ~~.

1 .

l

[ . o _ ..

U f f i  ! i t  ! t t t t' f f f P. I t- f t i e t i t t t t t t  : * * -

. : .:  : e:  :  :  : :  :  : :  :: - ::  :  :  : :t -:  :  :  :  :.: :  :  :  :  : : .b t- f.

s s s

2  :  :  :

m

. . , . s. .s . .s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. 5, . . tg.1.,

1. - t. t t t. t. t. t. . ! I t. - t. i 1  ! I t. i.

1 t t.

t..

t.

t t  ! t *gy

. . . . . . . . . . e > . .  !. . i. .t ..

1-8 1 1 8 8 8 6 6 8 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 2 3 8 l' 3 1 *1 8 1 3 8 1

  • f

.h

.t t

t. t.

t

. t.

t

t. t

. i. .

2 t.

.I

. .t t

t t

. ,t ,t t

. t. .t t

t

. .t .t .t t

. .t t

t t

.~

4 L- t t i t t t t t 1 t t 1 1 1 1 t t 1 1 1 1 1 1 t t t t t  :.

0 1 L ; 1 1 1 1 $ L :. : : l 1 1  %  : 1 1 1 1

  • 1 1 1  : ? 1 * *
d[-

. . s l ,

j *~

  • j

.S. .

. . . . 's

  • I