ML19260C699

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:29, 1 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards LOCA-ECCS Safety Evaluation for Unit 1 Re Amend to License NPF-4,incorporating Proposed Tech Spec Change 27. No Unreviewed Safety Questions Involved
ML19260C699
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/1980
From: Stallings C
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To: Harold Denton, Schwencer A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19260C700 List:
References
REF-PT21-79-182-001 986-C, NUDOCS 8001080471
Download: ML19260C699 (3)


Text

_

t VznorNIA Er.ecrarc Axn Powen Courrxv Rxcnxonn,VznorarA 20261 January 2, 1980 D**D *3 MYS me e M ]llh Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director 34:141 .lo.- K6C Cffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation F /MLO: myc Attu: Mr. A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No.1 Docket No.: 50-338 Division of Operating Reactors 50-339 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cosmaission Washington, DC 20555 License :so.- ;77-4 Ocar Mr. Denton:

SUPPLEFNTAL INTOP);A!!CN TO AMEND)ENT TO OPERATI:iG L;2NSI NPF-,

NORTH ANNA PC'JER STAI!CN UNITS NC. 1 A:C2 PRCPCSED TECICIICAL SPECIFIC..TICSS C.LUCC J0. 27 Attached is the cor:plete docur.entation of a '.;C.1-ECCC malysia concuct.ed with the NRC approved Teoruary,1978 version of the beatin;;heuse IC05 Evaluatica Model for North Anna Units hos. I and 2. The analysis t.as been cendac'.ed in coupliance with Appendix K to 10CFR50 .ind :seets the cri:eria dolineatac in 10CFR50. 46. The significant results frem this analysis were doc.imentec in =v letter of December 19,1979 (Serial No. 3863) and discussed by our Sr. M. L.

Bowling with your Mr. J. E. Rosenthall on Decer.ber 20, 1979. The analysis can be used as the basis for Technical Specification Change No. 27 which was submitted by my letter of Nover.ber 29,1979 (Serial No. 986) .

The analysis provided in the Attachment has been reviewed and raproved by both the Station Nuclear Safety and Operatind Cerz-ittee and the Sys tru suel.ar Safety and Operating Committee. It has been detar,:ined : Sat no u: revicuec safety questiors (as defined in 10CFR50.53) are involved.

\

1703 139 y

\

I 8001080  % d