ML19351D252

Submits Petition to Revoke CP for Facility.No Safe Storage for Radwaste Has Been Developed & Low Level Radiation Causes Cancer & Genetic Damage.Cooling Sys Has Not Been Proven Safe for Environ

ML19351D252
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	10/09/1980
From:	Epstein D, Platt P, Danni Smith AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
NUDOCS 8010090327
Download: ML19351D252 (2)

Text

4 c ~L'-- - -

.

v

~ . . .

..s.

-

.

1

• E, M UNDERSIGNED, PETITION M NUCLEAR REGULATORY CaMISSION TO REVOKE M LICENSE FOR H CONSTRUCTION OF M NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AT SEABROOK,

'

NEN HMPSHIRE. KE OPPOSE IT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS :

-

1. No safe and responsible method has been developed to store nuclear waste. The effects of nuclear wastes have been proven harmful to people, causing cancer and genetic damage.

2. We do not want to be exposed to low-level radiation emissions, such as has occurred at Vemon, Vement, where a similar nuclear power plant

.

, has been built. h cumulative effect of low-level radiation has been

) proven to cause cancer and genetic damage.

t

[, 3. h cooling system of the proposed Seabrr.,ok plant has not been proven safe for the environment.

E i NME ADDRESS DATE

.WL 'kw l>At uA 1 Ml$ 6 M24r @b hytn2-1 cr, 7/idU

' Uow U C s%

J %317 w Ai .A nd%(,n 1/i F/

\ Wr Pb+k %1S M 1]v.e.l (R)h G bl($ 13 L ht/8dh Mfr Ek blO bltr/f 6 l, h M /c.lo M SIN '

h ~ %/1 'Ib6 - -

~

6+& tebe <-F W2e -7

.

'

b w %d u N.kh

? UMLNN N & \ N.O C a_t r/ n a L Y 8(o*/D

'

N 1. nnt hus 1,0 X21 ~~ (Ebu n'sJ u Auj'f) a ff

.

'

h h i O J /> G'rr d h bdlI M/ 1 M[d (i roc 's P LHe , fhrt Mec h Lj.fg 1 KAW, li /kb:ug ,l'htddin[M2d,, A bi%A19/t 'n'//1. sceg2 s  % < w& nWi%&v n,a L/ /4 a..Mei'%u y Dws- A L Orn. D. I R ,,,1L r t'ed.,

Amr%otm hrr+ AM '

,ma -

'

' 8 ., ,,,  % 6 ,, j <.. w,L i,.ha ,p us,o ,ii;wsi Bir/ec (f'

At6A se, Du 4_e A%m2Jk/m m ,y w . i q,, , u.,s .s , y ja; g ,1. .i. w i 4 M 'YlW & . Ent pa.M  !;.m u uhn

MJ4ds 4m Hiles A k w r . A n J, , F L 22s c 7

!  :

b b 6 b . < b m h d A ,i1 kJb /Z MS

,

,., $ $. 0 AA Aln..k 59/ 7 2/' A } % ' c- C. W a> =.

_

/ ..

}

e w &

f<

y .

.s

hO t -

p f. <~y) *

' D *D'T f p.:Ik'w#.

.

s X. . ..

w j\ w

. . .

J _

di_. -

_2

\ - - _

l 8010090327 H

.

.- .- -. - - -

. _ _ _ - . - -_ __ -_ _ _ _ - _

' *

. . . _ _ . . . - . _ _ _ -. ,

_

_ -

, ,

..

r.

.

. . .. . l

. . *e

f. '

,

s .

- WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, PETITION THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY GMfISSION TO REVOKE THE LICENSE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF M NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AT SEABROOK, 7

. NEW HMPSHIRE. WE OPPOSE IT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS :

-

1. No safe and responsible method has been developed to store nuclear waste. . The effects of nuclear wastes have been proven hamful to i people, causing cancer and genetic damage.

,

2. We do not want to be exposed to low-level radiation emissiens, such as it. has occurred at Vernon, Verment, where a. similar nuclear pour plant

&'

has been built. ne cunnlative effect of Icw-level radiction has been F ~

proven to cause cancer and genetic damage.

>

'

d g 3 The cooling system of the proposed Seabrook plant has not been proven NL safe for the environment. -

NMEr - ADDRESS '

DATE V. b'laifRAu1 / h /lslOaA i n !k W, $'b h I h 8 /*3 l? O i  %;w %4 ' % th n /Def m uip b /., 90W ' 7 / h r s'o

'

? bhAd.As>?dem m s' r%fD% kt .26 gl w Tuk. 'h >Rxw* 2-- n ar,tb'st. L J n ,' Bddw Cota sc>u cdh f'l&

y ; T A 6. A Y K is h k t n -im (1 6 & m c & ; w .,' C D c o s n 2_ ilh

~'

Y b "

% hM i%i iW %. , .

,' c .wh u/i/90 ' jra i k , ,( a, is e,u, a.v <e.

' s,e, t 'ra'% wi / p Q ' lTnl=d Ind o utt i cNas 'a- ( . ,,:; , -. . c s .n '

dl,,'lel I- -- Aim %wnn 1 oM Th n i 6t . afb 9eddWnSO302, 'l//ld60

?. > ' 0 I h , D / = A v x' C!< No.wh 't66uSL iib v a3e L d'/7/VC '

B &.:e.')L&  %%d & !JL o ' io n wi ,'ls' MwA'$$us___ UI6&skd.d , AfAct ,Co. Tso :ro 2 W/dro f' .

'

.

.

,M% &/ , b .,. -lI7.n -r ,

_

ni m # ,e 7 i  %

• i .; vpf, 11._1/ 9? O$ E Y t, C $ b .* b. . l hk. Y rdvie l & Wiue 0<. Q 61f hl/ P 5/2l$

lI ^ @ A N/ M A <<o 21,4 h ,e( 1.-aO G d rh /.c ts ~

4.

, -ML, .d)A + nu %.uw fed AD Wif!<< o d.

n

- b, ) 4 6 it7 R.,....ed, .

WA'@ Ove '

7

(? 1/% . E C OC-f Y D C LM . OFC

[,h .dL 1 OqhfO s i 'A )O% 9v=0Ao/~(rn 965094 fYEO

p. -] Dwe % .'  % < .3 . . . a i n. - I n, ..J c .,

p: C8Y nab /GNlb-!W W' $CUl Y C th m 2 r- ca . hik 6 361tn.

~

h ; y ,,, h e I, b IE' L 2 G k u.h. A n 12 ~ L d cn Mhor

~

y _

m _

~

,

.

Q _

. . . .

_

.

. , .

_

, __