ML19351D252
| ML19351D252 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 10/09/1980 |
| From: | Epstein D, Platt P, Danni Smith AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8010090327 | |
| Download: ML19351D252 (2) | |
Text
4 c ~L'--
v
~
..s.
1 E, M UNDERSIGNED, PETITION M NUCLEAR REGULATORY CaMISSION TO REVOKE M LICENSE FOR H CONSTRUCTION OF M NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AT SEABROOK, NEN HMPSHIRE. KE OPPOSE IT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS :
1.
No safe and responsible method has been developed to store nuclear waste.
The effects of nuclear wastes have been proven harmful to people, causing cancer and genetic damage.
2.
We do not want to be exposed to low-level radiation emissions, such as has occurred at Vemon, Vement, where a similar nuclear power plant has been built. h cumulative effect of low-level radiation has been
)
proven to cause cancer and genetic damage.
t
[
3.
h cooling system of the proposed Seabrr.,ok plant has not been proven safe for the environment.
E NME i
ADDRESS DATE Ml$ 6 M24r @b hytn2-1 cr, 7/idU
.WL 'kw l>At uA 1
' Uow U C s%: J
%317 w Ai.A nd%(,n 1/i F/
\\
Wr Pb+k
%1S M 1]v.e.l (R)h G bl($ 13 L
ht/8dh Mfr Ek blO bltr/f 6 l, h M /c.lo M SIN '
h
~ %/1 'Ib6 -
~
6+& tebe
<-F W2e -7 b w %d u N.kh
? UMLNN N & \\ N.O C a_t r/ n a L Y
8(o*/D N 1. nnt hus 1,0 X21 ~~ (Ebu n'sJ u Auj'f) a ff h
h i O J /> G'rr d h bdlI M/ 1 M[d (i roc 's P LHe, fhrt Mec h Lj.fg 1
KAW, li /kb:ug,l'htddin[M2d,,
A bi%A19/t 'n'//1. sceg2
% < w&
nWi%&v n,a L/ /4 a..Mei'%u y s
Dws-A L Orn. D. I R,,,1L r t'ed.,
Amr%otm hrr+ AM
,ma
' 8.,,,,
% 6,, j <..
w,L i,.ha,p us,o,ii;wsi Bir/ec (f
At6A se, Du 4_e A%m2Jk/m m,y w.
i q,,
u.,s
.s, y ja; g,1.
.i. w i
4 M 'YlW &.
Ent pa.M
!;.m u uhn MJ4ds 4m Hiles A k w r. A J,, F L 22s c 7 n
b b 6 b. <
b m h d A,i1 kJb /Z MS
$ $. 0 AA Aln..k 59/ 7 2/' A
} % ' c-C. W a> =.
}
/
e w
hO f<
.s t
y D
- D'T p
f.
<~y)
- w j\\
w J
_ di_.
f p.:Ik'w#.
X.
s
_2
\\
l 8010090327 H
r.
f.
.. *e s
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, PETITION THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY GMfISSION TO REVOKE THE LICENSE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF M NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AT SEABROOK, 7
NEW HMPSHIRE. WE OPPOSE IT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS :
1.
No safe and responsible method has been developed to store nuclear waste.
. The effects of nuclear wastes have been proven hamful to i
people, causing cancer and genetic damage.
2.
We do not want to be exposed to low-level radiation emissiens, such as it.
has occurred at Vernon, Verment, where a. similar nuclear pour plant has been built. ne cunnlative effect of Icw-level radiction has been F
proven to cause cancer and genetic damage.
~
d g
3 The cooling system of the proposed Seabrook plant has not been proven N
safe for the environment.
L NMEr
- ADDRESS DATE V.
b'laifRAu1
/ h /lslOaA i n !k W, $'b h I h 8 /*3 l? O i
%;w %4
' % th n /Def m uip b /., 90W
' 7 / h r s'o
?
bhAd.As>?dem m s' r%fD%
kt.26 gl Bddw cdh f'l&
Tuk. 'h >Rxw* 2-- n ar,tb'st. L J n,'
Cota sc>u w
ilh Y
y ; T A 6. A Y K is h k t n
-im
~'
(1 6 & m c & ; w.,' C D c o s n 2_
u/i/90 ' jra b
hM i%i iW %.,
, c.wh i
k,,( a, is e,u, a.v <e.
' s,e, t 'ra'%
wi / p Q
' lTnl=d Ind o utt i cNas
'a- (.,,:;
, -.. c s.n dl,,'lel I-
?. > '
-- Aim %wnn 1 oM Th n i 6t. afb 9eddWnSO302, 'l//ld60 0 I h, D / = A v x' C!< No.wh
't66uSL iib v a3e L d'/7/VC B
&.:e.')L&
%%d & !JL o
' io wi,'ls' n
MwA'$$us___
UI6&skd.d, AfAct,Co. Tso :ro 2 W/dro f'.
,M%
&/,
b.,. -lI7.n
-r,
ni m
- ,e 7 i
%
- i.; vpf, 11._1/ 9?
O$
E Y
t, C $
b.*
b.
l hk. Y rdvie &
Wiue 0<. Q 61f hl/ P 5/2l$
lI ^
l
@ A N/ M A <<o 21,4 h,e(
1.-aO G d rh /.c ts 4.
, -ML,.d)A + nu %.uw fed AD Wif!<< o
~
d.
- b, ) 4 6 it7 R.,....ed, WA'@ Ove '
n
(? 1/%.
E C OC-f Y D C LM.
OFC 7
s i 'A )O%
9v=0Ao/~(rn 965094 fYEO
[,h -]
.dL 1 OqhfO p.
Dwe %.'
% <.3... a i n. -
I n,..J c.,
C8Y nab
/GNlb-!W W'
$CUl Y C p:
h ;
~
y,,, h e I, b th m 2 r-ca. hik 6 361tn.
IE' L 2 G k u.h. A n 12 ~ L d cn Mhor
~
y m
~
Q
__