ML20137H830

Application for Proposed Amend 133 to License DPR-54, Deleting Specified Wording from Tech Specs Involving Audits & Equipment Qualification.Safety Analysis,No Significant Hazards Evaluation & Change Description Encl.Fee Paid

ML20137H830
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	01/16/1986
From:	Reinaldo Rodriguez SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To:	Miraglia F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20137H836	List: ML20137H830 ML20137H849
References
RJR-85-608, TAC-61480, NUDOCS 8601220079
Download: ML20137H830 (5)

Text

.k n hfSMUD

~~

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT O 6201 s street, P.O. Box 15830. sacramento, CA 95813; (916) 452 3211 AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM SERVING THE HEART oF CAllFoRNIA RJR 85-608 January 16, 1986 DIRECTOR OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION ATTENTION FRANK J f11RAGLIA JR DIRECTOR, PWR B-DIVISION US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC 20555 DOCKET NO. 50-312 LICENSE NO. DPR-54 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 133 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.59, the Sacramento Muncipal Utility District proposes to amend its Operating License DPR-54 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 1.

In accordance with the Commission's determination (Federal Register, Vol.

49, No.120, June 20,1984, page 25371) that the tems "all" and " entire" can be deleted from technical specifications involving audits (Specifica-tions 6.2.8a, b, c and d), this proposed amendment implements those dele-tions.

In addition, earlier determination by the Commission (Federal Register, Vol . 48, No.15, January 21, 1983, page 2732) which allows deletion of the

" central file" requirement with respect to location of Equipment Oualifica-tion records is likewise implemented in this proposed amendment.

Attachments I, II and III to this submittal provide the Safety Analysis "No Significant Hazards" Evaluation and Description of Proposed Changes, re-spectively.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91(b)(1), the Padioloaical Health Branch of the California State Department of Health Services has been informed of this proposed amendment by co?y of this submittal.

Enclosed is a check in the amount of $150.00 as required by 10 CFR 170.21,

" Schedule of Fees."

LV B601220079 860116 2 DR ADOCK 050 f Ok k f0 ejb\

\ d a

PA - 133 January ,1986 Should you require any further infonnation with respect to this proposed amendment, please contact Mr. Ron W. Colombo at Rancho Seco Nuclear er; i Station Unit No. 1.

\

y R. . DRIG Z ASSISTANT GEME L MANAGER, NUCLEAR Attachments (3)

Subscribed and sworn to before me Wan===ummnawe=awammon===nmw+

this /5d day of (49tuA>wf , 1986 E .f9g PATRICIA K. GEISLER e *WI i NOTARY l't'St H:-cal f EOHNIA 3 ,/ l'HINCf;'il. OFFICE IN M u(

SACllA\tENTO COUNTY l I My Commission Expires Februar emnm uca ummnaar.nu y 16,1988 ,g

~N5tary Public '

_g-,-,,,.%t

ATTACl#ENT I SAFETY ANALYSIS Deletion of the terms "all" and " entire" with respect to Audits, and the central files requirement regarding the location of Equipment Qualification records are in accord with Commission determinations. A review of these deletions does not disclose any adverse effects on plant safety nor are they seen to constitute an unreviewed safety question.

ATTACHMENT II N0 SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS" EVALUATION The proposed deletions from the Rancho Seco Technical Specification of the terms "all" and " entire" with respect to Audits, and " central storage" with respect to Equipment Qualification records are in accordance with NRC deter-minations (Federal Register Vol. 49, No. 120, page 25371 and Vol. 48, No.15, page 2732, respectively). Therefore, Proposed Amendment No. 133 constitutes a purely administrative change which, by Commission guidance concerning the application of 10 CFR 50.92, is judged not likely to involve significant hazards considerations.

1 I

l i

f

, . - , , . - , y.-~, ,. -ec-- - - - - - - - * -

i-l' A1TACHMENT III DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CHANGES

1. Specification 6.5.2.8a, page 6-9: Deleted word "all", first line.

2. Specification 6.5.2.8b, page 6-9: Deleted word " entire", first line.

^

3. Specification 6.5.2.8c, page 6-9: Deleted word "all", first line.

4. Specification 6.5.2.8c, page 6-9: Replaced word "all" with " selected",

, first line, i 5. Specification 6.14.2, page 6-16: Deleted words "at a central location",

i - second line.

i 4

i t

i i-i i

h